http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-g3-review
If we pester Samsung on their Facebook page, do you think they will push out an update to let us do the same? There's so much crap on our phones that I wish I could uninstall.
I find it highly unlikely Samsung would allow such thing.
EDIT: Also, please enlighten me, where did you take that information from. Your link does not include such information.
Someguyfromhell said:
I find it highly unlikely Samsung would allow such thing.
EDIT: Also, please enlighten me, where did you take that information from. Your link does not include such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I mean.. They do in Korea so.
Sent from my SM-N900W8.
DrawnToLife said:
Well I mean.. They do in Korea so.
Sent from my SM-N900W8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your argument is invalid until you prove it with evidence.
Neo3D said:
http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-g3-review
If we pester Samsung on their Facebook page, do you think they will push out an update to let us do the same? There's so much crap on our phones that I wish I could uninstall.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The LG G3 AndroidCentral has for review is the Korean version and it is an early prototype.
Recently a law was passed in Korea which makes all bloatware pre-installed on a phone un-installable. This law is obeyed by all phone companies in Korea.
Since other countries have not taken such action against unwanted apps on phones, it is highly unlikely that Samsung or any other company will make bolatware removable in a future update.
They knocked back Kitkat for the S3 due to the bloatware in the rom needing too much RAM....I don't think they are gonna worry about people wanting to remove the bloatware, what they give you stays... Even if it means they won't update a Star phone...
Someguyfromhell said:
Your argument is invalid until you prove it with evidence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was under the impression that it had either happened or was in the process of happening.
http://www.zdnet.com/south-korea-rules-pre-installed-phone-bloatware-must-be-deletable-7000025533/
http://www.engadget.com/2014/01/24/south-korea-delete-preinstalled-android-apps/
Maybe it hasn't happened yet, but I do recall that it's been rolling out to some extent. I'll try to find a better source later.
Edit: Okay, so apparently the Korean S5 can remove some bloat.. but by the next iterations it should be happening :L
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303873604579493233990755384
I'm wrong. My bad.
Someguyfromhell said:
I find it highly unlikely Samsung would allow such thing.
EDIT: Also, please enlighten me, where did you take that information from. Your link does not include such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.lg.com/global/g3/index.html#features010203
Well, I think if most of their customers leave feedback on their FB page about the ability to remove bloatware, then they will get the message.
Neo3D said:
http://www.lg.com/global/g3/index.html#features010203
Well, I think if most of their customers leave feedback on their FB page about the ability to remove bloatware, then they will get the message.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feedback is just a feedback. They have company policy to follow. Thumb up if they can change any of their company/product policy, but so far I know seldom retailer will follow customer request.
Neo3D said:
http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-g3-review
If we pester Samsung on their Facebook page, do you think they will push out an update to let us do the same? There's so much crap on our phones that I wish I could uninstall.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im sure the EU recently passed a bill that forces mobile manufactures to give end users the option to remove bloat ware? which is probably why LG has lead the way first.
if only samsung let us
Neo3d is an obsessive poster I see nothing but constant posts and threads made from the individual lol I'm like wow so much time on Ur hands
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I got an idea. How about give us stock android, and the bloat be uninstallable? Some of the bloat built in breaks things bit as apps would help ram and interface be smoother.
sent from my sm-9005.
Meh! Root your device and be rid of bloat. Makes no difference to me either way.
Sent from my U30GT 2 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
@rbiter said:
I got an idea. How about give us stock android, and the bloat be uninstallable? Some of the bloat built in breaks things bit as apps would help ram and interface be smoother.
sent from my sm-9005.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the best option is to allow for the software to be uninstallable.
For those who want a phone and don't delve as deep into tech as the majority of users on these forums, all the in-built software is more than enough for them. For those who want more customisations, then we get the choice of uninstalling the programs.
Best of both worlds really, plus it's not forcing us to use their crap. Heck, we're still using their phones at least!
If the LG G3 released here in HK is 32GB/3GB then I'm gonna swap my Note 3 straight away.
@rbiter said:
I got an idea. How about give us stock android, and the bloat be uninstallable? Some of the bloat built in breaks things bit as apps would help ram and interface be smoother.
sent from my sm-9005.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just buy a nexus for Stock Android
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Free mobile app
---------- Post added at 07:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:27 PM ----------
I dont understand the disskussion about bloatware.. If you dont like it, buy another Phone or better use a 3310 Nokia ) nobody force you to buy a overbloated Phone and at least you can root and debloat it.. Even if your Phone is unrooted you can just deactivate any application
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Free mobile app
if this news are TRUE - then WOW WOW WOW. but based on what i've read from your posts guys - it is NOW for the KOREAN brand ' correct me if i'm wrong ' - so my Q although it is kinda stupid - will it be applied on international version of G3 ?. if the answer is NO then my next Q is will the KOREAN version work in my country ?
We're using the Korean Olleh (KT) variant of the phone — LG-F400K — running pre-release software, on the EE network in the UK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There.
Q - how is LG's attitude towards DEVELOPERS ? is it good ?
If LG comes like this NOTE 4 will have a pre-installed app called SAMSUNG S-ROOT:laugh:
Related
The latest Skype update for Android is available to everyone, but it only enables video chat on four specific handsets. Fortunately, impatient modders have gone some way to correcting this profound injustice, by creating APKs that activate video calling on other handsets too. So far we've heard of successful ports on the Samsung Galaxy S II and the HTC Sensation, Thunderbolt and EVO 4G. If you've got some other handset with Android 2.3, a little experimentation with the APK might also be worth your while. However, we just tried it on an Xperia Arc and didn't get very far: the app ran, but efforts to communicate with an Xperia Neo resulted in one-way video, a locked landscape mode and plenty of awkwardness. Let us know if you fare better -- you'll find a Thunderbolt-specific download at the DroidLife source link, and a more general APK at TechPetals.
http://blogs.skype.com/en/2011/06/smile_skype_for_android_with_v.html
Figured I would drop this in here if anyone has some know how and wants to look into it to see if there is anyway for us to have this on our phone. Doubt it though considering it requires 2.3 which seems to be the standard for google video chat and stuff, but hey, its worth a shot!!!
Found some more info. Tested and still didn't work but apparently on our device but confirmed on the SGS2. Here is the link for the guy who got it working.
http://www.villainrom.co.uk/forum/showthread.php/4849-Skype-with-Video-Support-for-Various-Devices...?p=42265#post42265
Im not familiar with knowing the ins and outs of editing an apk but this might be a start for someone who does
Probably requires GB.... I would think
yep. the official requires gb and in the list of device check. with device check removed, almost all with gingerbread can use it.
man, so much we can't do without gb. This phone should have launched with it.
skillz9669 said:
man, so much we can't do without gb. This phone should have launched with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. WTF on that?
the only true gripe I have with android is its similarity with linux, fragmented operating system. I mean we buy these $500+ phones and a week later I find some inferior phone doing more than we are, it blows my mind sometimes!!!
skillz9669 said:
the only true gripe I have with android is its similarity with linux, fragmented operating system. I mean we buy these $500+ phones and a week later I find some inferior phone doing more than we are, it blows my mind sometimes!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, one of Google's big thing at IO was that they wanted to eliminate the fragmentation, yet I haven't seen anything to indicate they're taking steps to achieve this.
Unfortunately it's one big advantage Apple has... they take a hard line position that the carrier doesn't touch the OS software, nor prevent the deployment of the updates. Not sure why Google is such a wuss when it comes to holding the carriers accountable for the timely delivery of their updates. AT&T says it's because they have to ensure a quality user experience, but comon, what AT&T customer actually believes that crap? LOL
bella92108 said:
Yeah, one of Google's big thing at IO was that they wanted to eliminate the fragmentation, yet I haven't seen anything to indicate they're taking steps to achieve this.
Unfortunately it's one big advantage Apple has... they take a hard line position that the carrier doesn't touch the OS software, nor prevent the deployment of the updates. Not sure why Google is such a wuss when it comes to holding the carriers accountable for the timely delivery of their updates. AT&T says it's because they have to ensure a quality user experience, but comon, what AT&T customer actually believes that crap? LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I work for AT&T and I can tell you that we (the pions in the store) think its crap too. The lockdowns, the non-market app bs, etc. I do hope google puts its BIG foot down one day and steps up to plate on this issue.
skillz9669 said:
I work for AT&T and I can tell you that we (the pions in the store) think its crap too. The lockdowns, the non-market app bs, etc. I do hope google puts its BIG foot down one day and steps up to plate on this issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it'll come and come soon. Now that android is becoming the mainstream people will catch on and support the carrier who is on top of it
bella92108 said:
I think it'll come and come soon. Now that android is becoming the mainstream people will catch on and support the carrier who is on top of it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey, this is gonna sound like a really dumb question and way off topic but can you tell me how your notified when someone posts. I have always been one to read through forums daily but have never gotten too good at participating, as you might tell as I have been a member for 3 years and have very little posts. I personally have to try and remember the threads I participated in and see if someone replied. This seems very redundant but I don't see a better way to be notified. Thanks in advance
Is anyone's phone dying quickly after installing this. I even tried signing out and closing the app but my phone legit drains 10% an hour on standby. So I deleted the app. Now my wifi is turning on and off and can't keep a constant connection. Help?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
cmjkxa said:
Is anyone's phone dying quickly after installing this. I even tried signing out and closing the app but my phone legit drains 10% an hour on standby. So I deleted the app. Now my wifi is turning on and off and can't keep a constant connection. Help?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally have seen no change since installing it, as for the wifi thing are you rooted and running any rom of sort of just stock? I have seen some wifi issues with the roms. Don't know if maybe the app sparked the problem or what but maybe you can backup your apps and reinstall. Good luck
bella92108 said:
Yeah, one of Google's big thing at IO was that they wanted to eliminate the fragmentation, yet I haven't seen anything to indicate they're taking steps to achieve this.
Unfortunately it's one big advantage Apple has... they take a hard line position that the carrier doesn't touch the OS software, nor prevent the deployment of the updates. Not sure why Google is such a wuss when it comes to holding the carriers accountable for the timely delivery of their updates. AT&T says it's because they have to ensure a quality user experience, but comon, what AT&T customer actually believes that crap? LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only true advantage that Apple has over Android is that they only more or less support one device. Android is spread amongst how many different devices? It's easy to put out lackluster updates to a single device, but putting out updates to 20+ different devices isn't so easy.
how are you guys even getting it to install? is it actually working?
yes please, can any one confirm that the video call on Skype is working on the infuse?
regards
no it is not working. installing the custom apk does give you the video call option, but if you press it, it goes into landscape to prepare for video call and then it does nothing. gingerbread is needed since it uses the frontfacing camera api.
cmjkxa said:
Is anyone's phone dying quickly after installing this. I even tried signing out and closing the app but my phone legit drains 10% an hour on standby. So I deleted the app. Now my wifi is turning on and off and can't keep a constant connection. Help?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, my phone's battery started draining in about two hours after installing Skype, so I uninstalled and things are better again now.
Even if Skype supports video on the Infuse, I don't think I will start using it unless they address the battery usage.
skillz9669 said:
hey, this is gonna sound like a really dumb question and way off topic but can you tell me how your notified when someone posts. I have always been one to read through forums daily but have never gotten too good at participating, as you might tell as I have been a member for 3 years and have very little posts. I personally have to try and remember the threads I participated in and see if someone replied. This seems very redundant but I don't see a better way to be notified. Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click "Thread Tools" at the top of the thread. Choose subscribe thread. Choose your poison.
That should set you up so you get notified.
Snehanshu said:
Yes, my phone's battery started draining in about two hours after installing Skype, so I uninstalled and things are better again now.
Even if Skype supports video on the Infuse, I don't think I will start using it unless they address the battery usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried Stop Skype from Market?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1153285
apparently theres been some success with modding skype for froyo. anybody want to try out some of these builds?
As Galaxy S owners, we are all united. As Android users we are all united. As far as Samsung is concerned we are all NOT created equal. Our device, the Vibrant (SGH-T959), is now being left to the wayside for any future updates from Samsung even though our core specs are extremely similar to the Google Nexus S, which has already received the ICS update. The CyanogenMod team has left us due to the on-going issue of 911/e911 and the lack of the proper code from Samsung to alleviate a potentially fatal result of a custom ROM. It is our intentions to serve Samsung with a petition asking for the update to ICS, which will in-turn, alleviate the 911/e911 issue as well.
We are asking all Galaxy S users to sign this petition to get Samsung to reconsider giving all top end Galaxy S devices the ICS update. Please help us with our goal and sign the petition. If you are on a Galaxy S phone, this affects you too.
Thank you for reading this and please see this link for more details and this link to sign the petition.
Ok, since it was explained a bit better to me, I'm allowing this to be reopened, however, I'll be keeping an eye on it. Keep it civil.
Thank you, Ann.
thanks for the update..hope things look up !!
I plan to sign this petition, but I'm a bit confused about how it includes all SGS devices. The entire letter speaks specifically to the Vibrant. Is a new letter still being written? Or how is it being conveyed that all SGS owners are signing this?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
The issue with the 3rd paragraph about how the Vibrant was released with 2.1 and then we fought for 2.2 only to be denied GB/ICS is in there to paint the picture of how consumer support has failed. It is specific to the Vibrant but the picture is for all Galaxy S users.
The CM team portion leaving the Vibrant is a problem (911/e911) that effects us all. For some reason they just dropped ONLY the Vibrant from their supported devices list b/c of this issue.
Still, we want to thank you for your support and help with this and hopefully they will at least listen to us.
Links to Samsung Twitter/Facebook/Google+:
Twitter:
- twitter.com/samsungtweets
- twitter.com/samsungmobileus
- https://twitter.com/SamsungJohn
- https://twitter.com/DigitalTrends
Facebook:
- www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA
- www.facebook.com/SamsungMobileUSA
Google+:
- https://plus.google.com/114303379611712597260/posts
let's be honest guys. Samsung did a logical thing by NOT giving us ICS update. I mean come on now.. even if they do decide to give us ICS, chances are it will be buggy as gs1 doesn't have enough memory to have ICS and TW... so really there is no point in giving us ICS, not only Samsung won't make any profit from doing this they might get flamed even more for making the phone slower buggier .. etc and
some people are saying they want stripped version of ICS on gs1 then why don't you just go buy yourself a nexus phone? Why would people buy nexus over galaxy when they're the same thing ? I could go on and rant about how samsung would have to meet terms with google, service providers and etc but ill stop here
Gingerbread from Samsung has been released. Rogers released it AGES ago.Gingerbread from AT&T has NOT been released.
your problem for Gingerbread is with AT&T. NOT SAMSUNG. Samsung released gingerbread to the carriers.
and to the post above, its not about buying an SG1 over a nexus, its about ALREADY OWNING SG1... and not enough memory for ics and touchwiz?? thats a propaganda lie. it would run fine. touchwiz consists of a launcher and a second (TW)framwork-res.apk and a few code changes to other system files. every rom has a laucher, so no loss there, wow extra 7mb framework... ohhh.. noo!
POST 3000!!!!!!
xriderx66 said:
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Signed even though I don't own one. you guys should get updates too!!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
TRusselo said:
Gingerbread from Samsung has been released. Rogers released it AGES ago.Gingerbread from AT&T has NOT been released.
your problem for Gingerbread is with AT&T. NOT SAMSUNG. Samsung released gingerbread to the carriers.
and to the post above, its not about buying an SG1 over a nexus, its about ALREADY OWNING SG1... and not enough memory for ics and touchwiz?? thats a propaganda lie. it would run fine. touchwiz consists of a launcher and a second (TW)framwork-res.apk and a few code changes to other system files. every rom has a laucher, so no loss there, wow extra 7mb framework... ohhh.. noo!
POST 3000!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just curious how do you know Samsung released GB to the carriers? Any sources?
EDIT: it is just me who finds big size fonts very irritating and irrelevant?
viny2cool said:
Just curious how do you know Samsung released GB to the carriers? Any sources?
EDIT: it is just me who finds big size fonts very irritating and irrelevant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All carrier control the release of the updates, manufacturers create the updates for the phone, except for the Nexus line which is controlled by Google. The new exception to that might be the Verizon Nexus. The evidence is that the I-896 and I897 are the exact same phone, except one says ATT on the front.
Can someone explain this 911 issue? I mean how can you dial 911 and it won't work? IT seems like any number would work! I'm a bit confused by it, am I missing something? Thats seems like a phone being unable to dial, well Pizza hut, I dunno. It doesn't make sense.
Oh and I signed the petition.
Cor-master said:
Can someone explain this 911 issue? I mean how can you dial 911 and it won't work? IT seems like any number would work! I'm a bit confused by it, am I missing something? Thats seems like a phone being unable to dial, well Pizza hut, I dunno. It doesn't make sense.
Oh and I signed the petition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think its related to dialing 911 when u don't have any network. I mean when u don't have sim card you can still make emergency calls.
sent from my cappy rocking ICS
popfan said:
All carrier control the release of the updates, manufacturers create the updates for the phone, except for the Nexus line which is controlled by Google. The new exception to that might be the Verizon Nexus. The evidence is that the I-896 and I897 are the exact same phone, except one says ATT on the front.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that they control it. But we don't know if Samsung actually gave it to ATT yet. Also there is no need of those kind of statements like in the post above my first post. No one is forcing him to sign the petition.
sent from my cappy rocking ICS
GB update (using KIES) for captivate:
http://www.samsung.com/us/support/SupportOwnersFAQPopup.do?faq_id=FAQ00024051&fm_seq=24219
viny2cool said:
I agree that they control it. But we don't know if Samsung actually gave it to ATT yet. Also there is no need of those kind of statements like in the post above my first post. No one is forcing him to sign the petition.
sent from my cappy rocking ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I support this, samsung should definitely take some initiative in regards to their previous devices.
Signed!
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
I will always be your side.But is it useful?
NEVER have I seen a phone with so much bloatware. And this is just the stuff I disabled!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
Wow!!!!!
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 2
Yeah, between att and Samsung there is a bit more than average.
Sent from my Xoom using xda app-developers app
Bloat will always be the first thing to go.
How do you disable those on the phone?
Can someone start the list of whats safe to remove/freeze?
poker? lol
only google and samsung service application remain ,remove the others will be safe.
wow that is sad, soon we be free, carriers i **** on you
Holy crap. That's insane.
type R-blood
Yeah I've got to say with the locked bootloader and all this bloat, my initial impression is not that great, unfortunately. Day to day use, the phone is not as fast as my GS3 running slim bean.
Screen and hardware are fabulous, but they really effed up the software this time around. Just went wayyyyyyy overboard. And locked bootloader? Come on now
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
soritong said:
How do you disable those on the phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Settings >more >application manager >all
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
SysAdmNj said:
Can someone start the list of whats safe to remove/freeze?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So far I haven't had any problems with all of this junk disabled.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
Bloatware, in and of itself, is a justification for unlocking a devices bootloader and installing a custom rom. How much space is wasted?
phositadc said:
NEVER have I seen a phone with so much bloatware. And this is just the stuff I disabled!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
phositadc said:
NEVER have I seen a phone with so much bloatware. And this is just the stuff I disabled!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something, but if you are going to disable all that Samsung software whats the point in getting an S4? It seems their software was the big upgrade this time around and the hardware less so.
It's more of a matter of form on AT&T's and Samsung's part.
familyguy26 said:
I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something, but if you are going to disable all that Samsung software whats the point in getting an S4? It seems their software was the big upgrade this time around and the hardware less so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think Com2UsPoker, Adapt Sound, At&T Family Maps, ChoKUKor, YPmobile,TripAdvisor, BlurbCheckout, Match3VS, or most any software displayed in the screenshots are particularly unique to the GS4. I'm sure most of us will not lament the absence of the majority of the displayed list of applications. All in all, it's a rather rude of Samsung and AT&T to put all of that clearly invaluable software on a $700 phone, then make it uninstallable.
Typed on savaged goods.
familyguy26 said:
I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something, but if you are going to disable all that Samsung software whats the point in getting an S4? It seems their software was the big upgrade this time around and the hardware less so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point? Having a beautiful screen and the best hardware on the market.
I think I speak for many people on this forum when I say that if I could get a GS4 with vanilla Android, I would do so in an instant and never look back.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
aleph_0 said:
Bloatware, in and of itself, is a justification for unlocking a devices bootloader and installing a custom rom. How much space is wasted?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure there was less than 10gb free space before I even installed any of my own stuff.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
familyguy26 said:
I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something, but if you are going to disable all that Samsung software whats the point in getting an S4? It seems their software was the big upgrade this time around and the hardware less so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bloatware is what is causing the lag online reviewers have been mentioning. If you disable/remove it, the phone will have no lag at all.
I'm hopeful to see some AOSP-based ROMS so I can remove the bloat known as TouchWIZ.
aleph_0 said:
I don't think Com2UsPoker, Adapt Sound, At&T Family Maps, ChoKUKor, YPmobile,TripAdvisor, BlurbCheckout, Match3VS, or most any software displayed in the screenshots are particularly unique to the GS4. I'm sure most of us will not lament the absence of the majority of the displayed list of applications. All in all, it's a rather rude of Samsung and AT&T to put all of that clearly invaluable software on a $700 phone, then make it uninstallable.
Typed on savaged goods.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my previous post I was referring to Samsung software.
---------- Post added at 01:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:43 PM ----------
phositadc said:
The point? Having a beautiful screen and the best hardware on the market.
I think I speak for many people on this forum when I say that if I could get a GS4 with vanilla Android, I would do so in an instant and never look back.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being the best is debatable. Nevertheless if you want a pure stock experience, then you might as well get a Nexus 5 when it comes out. It will be unlocked, cheaper, and probably have better specs.
DELETE
What exactly did you expect them to tell you?
PDXMatt said:
What exactly did you expect them to tell you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as always
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
A better question why people are obsessed to have the latest android on the phone? Who cares which ANDROID version is running when most people are using third party software anyway. Every Android upgrade brings more and more restrictions. From my experience, I can't tell much difference between 4.x and 5.x android except the restrictions which prevents some of my apps from working properly, such as tasker, avast anti theft and etc. What do you expect to see in marshmallow and you can't see in Kit Kat with TW. Don't forget that most of the stuff you see in Note 5 is TW apps and are not native android apps except Dialer
Almazick said:
A better question why people are obsessed to have the latest android on the phone? Who cares which ANDROID version is running when most people are using third party software anyway. Every Android upgrade brings more and more restrictions. From my experience, I can't tell much difference between 4.x and 5.x android except the restrictions which prevents some of my apps from working properly, such as tasker, avast anti theft and etc. What do you expect to see in marshmallow and you can't see in Kit Kat with TW. Don't forget that most of the stuff you see in Note 5 is TW apps and are not native android apps except Dialer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never understood the obsession either. I have an international M9 that has Marshmallow and frankly, it's virtually the same phone as it was with Lollipop. Marshmallow or not, I love my Note5. Marshmallow will come when it comes. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
PDXMatt said:
I've never understood the obsession either. I have an international M9 that has Marshmallow and frankly, it's virtually the same phone as it was with Lollipop. Marshmallow or not, I love my Note5. Marshmallow will come when it comes. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almazick said:
A better question why people are obsessed to have the latest android on the phone? Who cares which ANDROID version is running when most people are using third party software anyway. Every Android upgrade brings more and more restrictions. From my experience, I can't tell much difference between 4.x and 5.x android except the restrictions which prevents some of my apps from working properly, such as tasker, avast anti theft and etc. What do you expect to see in marshmallow and you can't see in Kit Kat with TW. Don't forget that most of the stuff you see in Note 5 is TW apps and are not native android apps except Dialer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand your point thnks
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Just do this. How messed up would it be if we had a locked bootloader?
They suck, but look at att and sprint forums.
It's a war and about $. But, I still love t-mobile.
What phone could we switch to and be happy? Those Google phones suck. What's an iPhone?
10-K said:
Just do this. How messed up would it be if we had a locked bootloader?
They suck, but look at att and sprint forums.
It's a war and about $. But, I still love t-mobile.
What phone could we switch to and be happy? Those Google phones suck. What's an iPhone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using teks rom took
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
I hope you did not create this thread (dont know why really) just to gain sympathy since it does not shed any extra light or truly help out in any fashion. Sorry guys its not here and I am sure there is a good reason for it. But its not like we need to know. Your device is not rendered useless without Marshmallow so again the point is?
Sorry not trying to bash or berate anyone just think maybe the other half dozen threads asking and receiving the same treatment would be enough for some of you to realize its not that important....
I mean for crying out loud there are more important things like protecting Beyonce from the mean people saying she is a Black Panther.
peace out people
playya said:
I hope you did not create this thread (dont know why really) just to gain sympathy since it does not shed any extra light or truly help out in any fashion. Sorry guys its not here and I am sure there is a good reason for it. But its not like we need to know. Your device is not rendered useless without Marshmallow so again the point is?
Sorry not trying to bash or berate anyone just think maybe the other half dozen threads asking and receiving the same treatment would be enough for some of you to realize its not that important....
I mean for crying out loud there are more important things like protecting Beyonce from the mean people saying she is a Black Panther.
peace out people
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That last part about Beyonce...PRICELESS!
No wonder xda is like it is
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
JonathanRAZ said:
No wonder xda is like it is
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that is?
PDXMatt said:
And that is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My guess is typical millennial kiddie posted a useless thread, gets called out, and rages about the forum or something. Mod delete.
..
Here you go guys/gals. A thread where you can discuss anything you want concerning the S8 root or anything really! Yayyyyyy!
Two threads have been closed regarding root because of fellow members speaking out of topic.
Enjoy and be civilized!
Still waiting for US S8+ Snapdragon rooted with system R/W ENG ROM to be posted. Exynos S8/S8+ owners are fortunate that Samsung doesn't lock stuff down as tight as Qualcomm!
Will this method root my Moto Z Force 2 when it launches? /s
BoredKender said:
Will this method root my Moto Z Force 2 when it launches? /s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
I have an idea. Why don't we put a nice little nifty first things to do when you get root list together?
Debloating, tweaking, themes, etc.
Personally I'm excited for the camera mods we will be able to perform now.
Sweet
Wanting to keep OTA updates off my phone, but as I mentioned in a previous thread, when I tried to run AdHell, it wanted to use the Samsung FIrewall, which seems to want to update knox, so I've avoided it for now... I've heard other say to use "package disabler," but I see a couple different versions (e.g. Package Disabler Pro by PoliceDeveloper, BK Package Disabler by WakaSoftware.com, etc), so wasn't sure exactly which one was recommended. Another option I was thinking of would be maybe to just use ADB, as I think I could probably disable the 2-4 update packages that way as well. Thoughts anyone?
BoredKender said:
Will this method root my Moto Z Force 2 when it launches? /s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this won't. This thread is for the Galaxy S8/S8+. I'm sure there is a thread for the Moto Z Force 2. Though I don't think the phone is even released yet and so it will probably be a while before root is achieved.
TheLastSidekick said:
I have an idea. Why don't we put a nice little nifty first things to do when you get root list together?
Debloating, tweaking, themes, etc.
Personally I'm excited for the camera mods we will be able to perform now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung already has done a magnificent job with the camera.... What camera mods have there been for previous galaxy devices?
I think any package disabler will work... I use the BK one though and adhell....
Sorry to beat a dead horse with the 80% but....... Do all eng firmwares have this 80 percent limit
Kjc99 said:
I think any package disabler will work... I use the BK one though and adhell....
Sorry to beat a dead horse with the 80% but....... Do all eng firmwares have this 80 percent limit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need to apologize as I said we can speak of all things regarding the S8 root.
I personally have a battery case for my S8, invest in one its pretty darn great. It only cost me $30
XBlackChaosX said:
No, this won't. This thread is for the Galaxy S8/S8+. I'm sure there is a thread for the Moto Z Force 2. Though I don't think the phone is even released yet and so it will probably be a while before root is achieved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its released lol wtf people
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers Legacy app
ngdskier said:
Wanting to keep OTA updates off my phone, but as I mentioned in a previous thread, when I tried to run AdHell, it wanted to use the Samsung FIrewall, which seems to want to update knox, so I've avoided it for now... I've heard other say to use "package disabler," but I see a couple different versions (e.g. Package Disabler Pro by PoliceDeveloper, BK Package Disabler by WakaSoftware.com, etc), so wasn't sure exactly which one was recommended. Another option I was thinking of would be maybe to just use ADB, as I think I could probably disable the 2-4 update packages that way as well. Thoughts anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't go wrong with BK package disabler!
meathammer386 said:
Its released lol wtf people
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok cool, I didn't know.
Snaps. Finally somewhere to have some debates that will never end,
Kind of like republicans and democrats trying to agree on something...
Lmfao
XBlackChaosX said:
Oh ok cool, I didn't know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol people are crazy this s8 not moto wtf lol
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers Legacy app
---------- Post added at 06:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:03 AM ----------
progro420 said:
Snaps. Finally somewhere to have some debates that will never end,
Kind of like republicans and democrats trying to agree on something...
Lmfao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a shot show
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers Legacy app
meathammer386 said:
Lol people are crazy this s8 not moto wtf lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol I know, I'm sure he/She was trolling though.
How much bigger is the note 8 compared to s8+
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Is it still trolling when the OP says anything goes? I have been told that my humor is a little dry but damn. I thought that one was an obvious joke.
Was just a little giggle on my end while I wait for the actual 950U root release.
Lmao no not at all bro....it's just that it was funny to see that question in an S8 thread. Eitherway no shade, I replied with what I knew regarding the Force 2.