So pretty much every reviewer has commented on the challenges with the fingerprint sensor as we expected. The other interesting thing is that the reviews call out the difficulty of using the iris scanner since you need to position it just right and on the other hand, facial recognition is lightning fast, but not very secure. What will you use?
My thoughts here are that facial recognition isn't really that bad. Who are you trying to protect against? If the phone is at your house/work or whatever, most of the people in a vicinity of your phone aren't really out to hurt you by using a picture to get into your phone. If you lost your phone, just use Google Device Manager to kill the facial unlock.
Thoughts?
Face-unlock sucks unless the device using it has a decent IR light on it. When I worked IT I would get to the office before the lights came on and the little bit of sunlight wasnt enough for the phone to properly read my face. Facial hair pissed it off, too.
Considering the home button on my Note 5 is a terrible place for fingerprint reader, the S8+ will be an improvement over that. Touching the camera glass is a non-issue... A light fingerprint wont cause any noticable impact on photo quality, and even if it did it takes all of a half second to wipe it clean.
I will probably use iris unless it sucks for me, then I will just use fingerprint till the iris scanner gets sorted. I guess I will put a vote in for Iris then.
faaaaq said:
Face-unlock sucks unless the device using it has a decent IR light on it. When I worked IT I would get to the office before the lights came on and the little bit of sunlight wasnt enough for the phone to properly read my face. Facial hair pissed it off, too.
Considering the home button on my Note 5 is a terrible place for fingerprint reader, the S8+ will be an improvement over that. Touching the camera glass is a non-issue... A light fingerprint wont cause any noticable impact on photo quality, and even if it did it takes all of a half second to wipe it clean.
I will probably use iris unless it sucks for me, then I will just use fingerprint till the iris scanner gets sorted. I guess I will put a vote in for Iris then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally valid points - allegedly Samsung has improved face unlock to be really good, so it will be interesting to see in low light. I know you can use fingerprint + iris, but not sure you can use fingerprint + face unlock.
Something I wish came stock was the ability to snap a picture with the front and/or back camera whenever someone failed to unlock the device...
Unfortunately I cant test the iris unlock or facial unlock till freakin Tuesday because Best Buy is terrible and I should have known better...
Same always, 4 digit passcode. What's wrong with people. I'm not volunteering my biometrics to ANYONE. EVER. That's "jail bait"
faaaaq said:
Something I wish came stock was the ability to snap a picture with the front and/or back camera whenever someone failed to unlock the device...
Unfortunately I cant test the iris unlock or facial unlock till freakin Tuesday because Best Buy is terrible and I should have known better...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cerberus can do this
The Phone Company said:
Same always, 4 digit passcode. What's wrong with people. I'm not volunteering my biometrics to ANYONE. EVER. That's "jail bait"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really for this thread but... Biometrics are stored locally. Also your pin is far more insecure given that anyone can see it and every store you are in has cameras which will pick up your pin
km8j said:
Cerberus can do this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cerberus can eat me. I had a lifetime membership with them but then they decided more money was better than good relationships with customers so they expired all of the promotional lifetime memberships. This was their official statement:
"We had to revoke free lifetime licenses that were given away during a few promotions we made years ago. We apologize for this and know it is a bad PR move, unfortunately it was not feasible anymore for us to provide a free service for life.
Free licenses will expire about 3 years after their beginning, and affected users will be notified via email before the license expires. We hope Cerberus helped those users recover a lost or stolen device, and that they will consider buying a license to continue to use our service. Paid licenses are not affected."
km8j said:
Cerberus can do this
Not really for this thread but... Biometrics are stored locally. Also your pin is far more insecure given that anyone can see it and every store you are in has cameras which will pick up your pin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a security announcement, for your safety we recommend… always shield your pin. If you see something suspicious.
This is for the "always be in fear" crowd. I am not one of those goats. Security update my @$$. Having used Windows 7 for the past decade I do not allow "Automatic Updates". Same with Samsung, "Security Update: Improves Performance, Prolongs Battery Life". This is a 'Trojan Horse' to get your biometrics on the grid. What next, DNA Tester? Blood Sample?
Even IF someone has my PIN, then what? Do they have my phone? Even if I had your phone locked down with Fingerprint Lock, I can just reset the device?
Nope, not buying it. That stuff's for the goats.
I used Iris unlock on both of the Note 7s I had and never had any issues. It even worked when I had my glasses on.
Sent from my wickedly awesome Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 using my S-Pen. Duh!!!
The Phone Company said:
This is a security announcement, for your safety we recommend… always shield your pin. If you see something suspicious. This is for the "always be in fear" crowd. I am not one of those goats. Security update my @$$. Having used Windows 7 for the past decade I do not allow "Automatic Updates". Same with Samsung...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait.... are you saying you've refused updates on Win7 for 10 years? Entirely?
I must be reading that wrong. Because an unpatched Windows 7 machine (nevermind apps) would be an exploit playground. And same with Samsung.
The Phone Company said:
Even if I had your phone locked down with Fingerprint Lock, I can just reset the device?
Nope, not buying it. That stuff's for the goats.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's twice, but I'm not sure if "goat" is just an insult, or reference to Doddington's zoo.
Either way, using a 4-digit PIN trades ease of use for very low security. It can even be guessed remotely, using sensor data showing how you tilt the phone.
As far as "just resetting the device", that won't bypass Full Disk Encryption., because it should erase the keys stored for FDE and render internal storage unreadable. I'll confirm this on my S8+ when I get it today.
Who exactly is going to take my phone or "guess remotely" my pin. And go ahead, quote fear mongering propaganda. Some people will believe anything they read. The world is full of people looking to hack their phone and computer I get it. Better "be safe and secure" and use Iris Scanner and Fingerprint Sensor. These 2 things are like one year old, what were people doing to "protect" their phones for the 10 or 20 years prior. Just a reminder, your whole bank account, life savings, in the form of Debit Card/Credit Card is used how? With a 4 digit Pin number. I would rather guess that remotely than worry about your "smart phone"
The Phone Company said:
Who exactly is going to take my phone or "guess remotely" my pin. And go ahead, quote fear mongering propaganda. Some people will believe anything they read. The world is full of people looking to hack their phone and computer I get it. Better "be safe and secure" and use Iris Scanner and Fingerprint Sensor. These 2 things are like one year old, what were people doing to "protect" their phones for the 10 or 20 years prior. Just a reminder, your whole bank account, life savings, in the form of Debit Card/Credit Card is used how? With a 4 digit Pin number. I would rather guess that remotely than worry about your "smart phone"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the thinly-veiled ad hominems, and catching my "fear-mongering propaganda". Most people are easily fooled by inline URLs., but not you.
Another reply isn't going to do much, because the goalposts are moving around fast. What happened to Win7 never being updated? Now we're on to my bank account (which BTW uses routing, account, and ACH numbers, not just a 4-digit PIN). I don't play that kind of game though. Cheers.
km8j said:
Cerberus can do this
Not really for this thread but... Biometrics are stored locally. Also your pin is far more insecure given that anyone can see it and every store you are in has cameras which will pick up your pin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
voxluna said:
Wait.... are you saying you've refused updates on Win7 for 10 years? Entirely?
I must be reading that wrong. Because an unpatched Windows 7 machine (nevermind apps) would be an exploit playground. And same with Samsung.
That's twice, but I'm not sure if "goat" is just an insult, or reference to Doddington's zoo.
Either way, using a 4-digit PIN trades ease of use for very low security. It can even be guessed remotely, using sensor data showing how you tilt the phone.
As far as "just resetting the device", that won't bypass Full Disk Encryption., because it should erase the keys stored for FDE and render internal storage unreadable. I'll confirm this on my S8+ when I get it today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So for the first time ever in all of my 3 years on my Note 4 (and never gotten on my Note 2 or S2) I got this pop up on my screen after clicking the links you posted, way to go. You had a point to prove, huh?
A little delving into your attached links this shows up:
https://www.tripwire.com/state-of-s...tails-not-just-prove-android-security-stinks/
Any one having issues activating Cerberus app in S8+?
Actually I have no problem with fingerprint scanner "location" (near camera some folk says) and its pretty fast and it opens my phone on very first try. the only thing i don't like is when the phone is on the table i need to pick it up and use fingerpring which in this scenario I use pattern unlock.
I use the iris scanner all the time and it works flawlessly unless the phone is in direct sun light and then it doesn't work well and I use the fingerprint scanner but in most cases the iris scanner works just great!
someone261 said:
I use the iris scanner all the time and it works flawlessly unless the phone is in direct sun light and then it doesn't work well and I use the fingerprint scanner but in most cases the iris scanner works just great!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. It is not quite as easy to use as fingerprint scanning- however a pin or more secure password option exists and with smartlock setup- the phone will only lock when not near your Bluetooth connected watch, car audio, etc. Secure folders is an added layer of security (S8). Besides theft, the principal vunerability is downloading apps not in the Google play store. However none of the above is fool proof. Antivirus/malware tools should also help.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Iris scanner on Samsung S8 has been defeated. Fingerprint reader has not.
Banking apps use Fingerprint reader. So does LastPass that can protect other passwords. Use a complex PIN with more than 4 numbers as a last resort if Fingerprint detection doesn't work.
ocujos said:
Iris scanner on Samsung S8 has been defeated. Fingerprint reader has not.
Banking apps use Fingerprint reader. So does LastPass that can protect other passwords. Use a complex PIN with more than 4 numbers as a last resort if Fingerprint detection doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Defeated how exactly?
someone261 said:
Defeated how exactly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Related
All the reviews I read prior to receiving my phone said Samsung utilized the face unlock and Iris unlock in conjunction together.... My device tells me I can't have enough both on at the same time. Was something changed or am I missing something?
Yeah you can only use one or the other in conjunction with the fingerprint sensor...
that would be ideal to have both face recognition and iris scanner working at the same time in case one or the other cant recognize you.
nique0201 said:
All the reviews I read prior to receiving my phone said Samsung utilized the face unlock and Iris unlock in conjunction together.... My device tells me I can't have enough both on at the same time. Was something changed or am I missing something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the reviews I read mentions it's one or the other
choch69 said:
that would be ideal to have both face recognition and iris scanner working at the same time in case one or the other cant recognize you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It they would work at the same time, iris scanner would never engage as face unlock is faster.
so awesome
Its one or another for sure.. From a Device user since a while..
Hmm maybe I was mistaken I swear on release day they were saying they included it to assist with unlocking when the Iris scanner isn't picking up the eyes fast enough... And the Iris scanner would be the option for when you're in pitch black situations
Iris scanner is useless if you wear glasses. Have to take off your glasses to use it.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
sanjsrik said:
Iris scanner is useless if you wear glasses. Have to take off your glasses to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wear contacts and it works almost flawlessly. Sometimes I have to purposely not look at my phone because it unlocks so damn fast
Iris scanner is lighted with an infrared diode so no problem in total darkness.
If biometrics fail you can always unlock with your PIN.
I also recommend using the option of requiring a PIN when starting the device.
This is for your own protection in case your device gets seized at a checkpoint as you cannot be legally forced to enter a pin/password whereas biometrics (face/iris/fingerprint) you CAN be!
nique0201 said:
Hmm maybe I was mistaken I swear on release day they were saying they included it to assist with unlocking when the Iris scanner isn't picking up the eyes fast enough... And the Iris scanner would be the option for when you're in pitch black situations
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wouldn't make much sense for security. Right now it's (biometric) from least secure to most secure face>fingerprint>iris
if the most secure can't unlock your method, why would it try a less secure method from the same general area?
they say to use iris for the most secure method. but then allow it to unlock with the least secure?
that would be like you try to login here and it says password is wrong (esdd9udskl%(_*$#1239) so then it just asks you for your first name instead to log you in.
Only way it could be useful is if the light sensor thinks it's too bright outside (where iris scanner doesn't work) then it can do face unlock only in those situations with a warning that it will use a less secure method.
choch69 said:
that would be ideal to have both face recognition and iris scanner working at the same time in case one or the other cant recognize you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Face recognition will recognize you faster than iris every time.
The point of having the exclusivity is to have the user choose: ease of use or security
For the fraction of a second difference, I'll be choosing security with iris.
iris has been working so well for me that I see no reason for face unlock. Only time I had an issue was outside when bright and also wearing sunglasses.
Problem is, if it's bright outside, I'm wearing shades.... and when I'm wearing shades, face unlock doesn't work either lol.
another thing with iris is if the phone is too far away, you gotta bring phone or face closer to the other. (this week's example is I'm in class and trying to unlock phone under the table and it's too far for my eyes to be recognized).
if you know there is gonna be an issue, just touch the fingerprint sensor. it will open screen and unlock.
nique0201 said:
I wear contacts and it works almost flawlessly. Sometimes I have to purposely not look at my phone because it unlocks so damn fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
contacts are not glasses.
nique0201 said:
Hmm maybe I was mistaken I swear on release day they were saying they included it to assist with unlocking when the Iris scanner isn't picking up the eyes fast enough... And the Iris scanner would be the option for when you're in pitch black situations
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sanjsrik said:
contacts are not glasses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would think glasses would give issues because the ir light would reflect off the glasses and not brigthen up the iris
razorseal said:
That wouldn't make much sense for security. Right now it's (biometric) from least secure to most secure face>fingerprint>iris
if the most secure can't unlock your method, why would it try a less secure method from the same general area?
they say to use iris for the most secure method. but then allow it to unlock with the least secure?
that would be like you try to login here and it says password is wrong (esdd9udskl%(_*$#1239) so then it just asks you for your first name instead to log you in.
Only way it could be useful is if the light sensor thinks it's too bright outside (where iris scanner doesn't work) then it can do face unlock only in those situations with a warning that it will use a less secure method.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you're right but I didn't think into detail I just swore that's what I read. I swear all the head lines were like "Samsung to include face scan because Iris scanner not yet up to par" that made it sound like to me they would be used in conjunction
sanjsrik said:
contacts are not glasses.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. Lol. But the warning on the phone always warns about contacts and glasses... I think it's for the thick colored ones that's the issue though.
Both face and Iris unlock suck. Finger is in a bad spot. FML
strongsteve said:
Both face and Iris unlock suck. Finger is in a bad spot. FML
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Iris is working phenomenally for me. I haven't used face yet though. I haven't had to use finger but I have a otter box on so I can feel right where the scanner is and my pixel kind of got me used to back scanners.
So yes just lets admit it, The fingerprint scanner on Vivo Nex is not perfect, but what it represent is forward thinking which will force other manufactures to follow, but we all know that Optic under glass fingerprint scanner will have to make room to the far superior ultrasonic technology.
despite this I am interesting to know what method you people are using to get higher success rate ?
The first question that comes to mind does it really help to save multiple fingerprints for the same finger ?
Even though I mostly my thumb to unlock where it is hit and miss the index finger have a lot higher success rate, and I wonder why.
Dry hands seem to be a big problem for the fingerprint scanner... I therefor tried to save a new fingerprinting when my finger are dry, I cant say it any visible improvement. It is still frustrating that my index finger seem to work a lot better on the fingerprint scanner.
Fingerprint scanner seem to work better in dark room rather then a well lit room or environment.
please posts your findings how to improve success rate especially for using the thumbs.
I think there is still hope that the fingerprint scanner will improve further in future software updates.
I also think, people will have a different success rate because of biological versions, some fingers are maybe harder to read then others for some reason. Lets hope Vivo will push out more updates for the fingerprint accuracy. This is their first device aimed for the global market so lets hope they will give this one extra care since this device will be the bridge into the global market..
I use multiple fingerprints for one finger and think it's much more reliable than one saved fingerprint.
Interesting that my index fingers are also working much better with only one saved profile instead of my right thumb
Vivo Nex S is recognizing your already saved fingerprints. Nevertheless you can simply save the same fingerprint again by moving and trying different positions from your finger. I actually saved my right thumb three times and surprised how good it works (for the first 3 days)
Sent from my vivo NEX S using XDA Labs
Actually 2 months now I’m very pleased by reliability accuracy and smoothness of 3D underscreen fingerprint scanner.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Tafff said:
I use multiple fingerprints for one finger and think it's much more reliable than one saved fingerprint.
Interesting that my index fingers are also working much better with only one saved profile instead of my right thumb
Vivo Nex S is recognizing your already saved fingerprints. Nevertheless you can simply save the same fingerprint again by moving and trying different positions from your finger. I actually saved my right thumb three times and surprised how good it works (for the first 3 days)
Sent from my vivo NEX S using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks..I thought that had been tried in youtube videos I think I saw people say its does not help to make multiple fingerprints for the same finger... it should not be needed..it should be smarter then that..
especially since you press the finger multiple times when you setup a new fingerprint.
Well anyway I will try it..I guess it can be worse then what it is now....
Its frustrating that the index finger works so well..and not the thumbs...
I saw some review where they said that someone unlocked their smartphone with an unregistered finger...
This fingerprint sensor is really not reliable at all
And funny, i asked Vivo on facebook about this issue, Joe just told me "use a password instead" ...
Wahoux said:
I saw some review where they said that someone unlocked their smartphone with an unregistered finger...
This fingerprint sensor is really not reliable at all
And funny, i asked Vivo on facebook about this issue, Joe just told me "use a password instead" ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately Joe from vivo isn't a good supporter :/
Sent from my vivo NEX S using XDA Labs
Wahoux said:
I saw some review where they said that someone unlocked their smartphone with an unregistered finger...
This fingerprint sensor is really not reliable at all
And funny, i asked Vivo on facebook about this issue, Joe just told me "use a password instead" ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest I don't trust any videos about finger print scanner. If somebody wants to troll all they have to do is register the finger and state on the video that finger is unregistered and just troll the Vivo Nex owners about how unreliable the phone finger print scanner is.
I tried several times to unlock the phone with any finger that is unregistered and 100% of the time the phone doesn't unlock and send me to unlocked the phone with the pin number.
And the finger print scanner works 98% of the time with me on my registered fingers, I noticed the other 2% is because my fingers are wet or dirty from working out.
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app
I scanned my thumbs fingerprints and it works better with the left one. Even after a rescan of the right one
I didn't succeed in making a second scan with a finger already stored
Of course I don't know why
The accuracy is fine,however there is another interesting notice-you don't actually have to wait with your finger on the screen until the phone unlocks. You can simply put the finger for a second,release it and then wait a bit more for the unlock. That's quite intersting user experience and it makes the visibility of a faster finger recognition process than it actually is
Tafff said:
I use multiple fingerprints for one finger and think it's much more reliable than one saved fingerprint.
Interesting that my index fingers are also working much better with only one saved profile instead of my right thumb
Vivo Nex S is recognizing your already saved fingerprints. Nevertheless you can simply save the same fingerprint again by moving and trying different positions from your finger. I actually saved my right thumb three times and surprised how good it works (for the first 3 days)
Sent from my vivo NEX S using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry but I do not believe in this method...
Remember when you create a fingerprint you scan your finger multiple of times even from the edges etc.
Theoretically it could only lead to even slower scanning.
Anyway success rate have improved a lot the last 2 days not sure why...
Hopefully its learning and getting better for each day. I still hope vivo will solve the speed.
one frustrating thing is the screen dont unluck directly even when the scanner have read your finger for instance I cant put off my finger before it gets unlocked and it unlock...
I hope next update will come with some improvements regarding fingerprint scanner cause I think it does not live up fully to its potential right now.
It seems that the unlocking process is actually quite fast. There is a delay because of the animation. If you turn off animations in developer's options unlocking would be faster.
Enable double tab to wake screen
Then
Double tab screen
Use fingerprint
This make it ultra fast anf accurate
---------- Post added at 12:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:10 PM ----------
Always find my right hand not working fine with fingerprint??
Make sure the position you scan your finger is in the same position you unlock ur phone, I found this to work 8-9 times out of 10
what I have learned lately is, its good to not push too hard on the screen push very gentlely it seem to be easier to unlock. anyway I think this scanner still need software updates to improve it have problems in well lit scenarios, luckily I am a night bird..
blackinfinity said:
what I have learned lately is, its good to not push too hard on the screen push very gentlely it seem to be easier to unlock. anyway I think this scanner still need software updates to improve it have problems in well lit scenarios, luckily I am a night bird..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I can confirm push the on screen scanner gently always works brilliantly,in few scenarios I pushed it harder didn’t response some time with first attempt.
Overall experience 2.5 months I’m very pleased with accuracy,response and smoothness as long we learn his trick.
Always helpful if someone experience not so good response or accuracy to register 1 more time from beginning it’s finger and tested one day continuously until been successfully.
And repeat 1-2 times to find their best performance to his own way.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
I just played with the fingerprint yesterday and I feel that it works better when we press harder I added the fingerprint in the dark, with a minimal backlight pressing the finger firmly.
I sorry for my English, I use Google Translator.
Fingerprint scanner has been updated with latest funtouch software , Rescan your fingers, you will definitely see and feel an improvement ?
ruk21201 said:
Fingerprint scanner has been updated with latest funtouch software , Rescan your fingers, you will definitely see and feel an improvement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you mean the global or the chinese rom ? I use the chinese rom, I think nothing was mentioned about fingerprint scanner improvements in either of the latest firmwares of global and chinese. Anyway I will try rescan my fingers I have nothing to lose.
blackinfinity said:
Do you mean the global or the chinese rom ? I use the chinese rom, I think nothing was mentioned about fingerprint scanner improvements in either of the latest firmwares of global and chinese. Anyway I will try rescan my fingers I have nothing to lose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Global version
Install 1.8.8 update and fingerprint is supersonic fast now
I haven't seen any real review of the fingerprint sensor - only comments about the position on the screen.
Since there is no face or iris detection like on the Note 9, the fingerprint sensor will have to be pretty good.
Any ideas about this?
Edit: I just found one review that says there is face detection, which is a relief if it's true. I definitely saw one report that said there was only the fingerprint, so I'm now hoping that was wrong.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlMMXKKyfu4
RR-99 said:
I haven't seen any real review of the fingerprint sensor - only comments about the position on the screen.
Since there is no face or iris detection like on the Note 9, the fingerprint sensor will have to be pretty good.
Any ideas about this?
Edit: I just found one review that says there is face detection, which is a relief if it's true. I definitely saw one report that said there was only the fingerprint, so I'm now hoping that was wrong..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i hope they have improved the under screen scanner from the S10 plus because it was garbage. I actually sold my s10 plus because it was so unreliable.
There is face unlock but if it works like the s10 plus it is not secure and can be spoofed with a picture of yourself. I didnt use that feature due to this on the S10 plus and since the fingerprint scanner was trash ended up using a pin/pattern.
I didnt spend $1500 on a 2019 device to use old unlock tech lim
Iike like that.
They should have brought back the retina scanner to secure the face unlock
About 11:30 in you'll see the fingerprint sensor test. Appears flawless according to Unbox Therapy. Most people who had issues with the S10 fingerprint sensor had those issues due to the screen protectors they were using, even though they blame the phone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIn1mbgBhww
Semantics said:
About 11:30 in you'll see the fingerprint sensor test. Appears flawless according to Unbox Therapy. Most people who had issues with the S10 fingerprint sensor had those issues due to the screen protectors they were using, even though they blame the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was using the factory installed screen protector on my S10 plus and the scanner was still terribly unreliable.
And Lew was not unlocking from a black screen in that video either which made a big difference on my s10 plus.
If i hit the power button to view the lock screen then unlocked it was more reliable but from a locked black screen it was less than 50% reliable.
force70 said:
I was using the factory installed screen protector on my S10 plus and the scanner was still terribly unreliable.
And Lew was not unlocking from a black screen in that video either which made a big difference on my s10 plus.
If i hit the power button to view the lock screen then unlocked it was more reliable but from a locked black screen it was less than 50% reliable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still think it had something to do with the Samsung screen protectors too, even though they claimed they were designed for that purpose. I do not use a screen protector at all. If anything happens to my screen it costs me 29 bucks to get a new one so I generally don't have any sensitivity issues.
Semantics said:
I still think it had something to do with the Samsung screen protectors too, even though they claimed they were designed for that purpose. I do not use a screen protector at all. If anything happens to my screen it costs me 29 bucks to get a new one so I generally don't have any sensitivity issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will cost me alot more than that to replace my screen here in Canada!
Semantics said:
I still think it had something to do with the Samsung screen protectors too, even though they claimed they were designed for that purpose. I do not use a screen protector at all. If anything happens to my screen it costs me 29 bucks to get a new one so I generally don't have any sensitivity issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you get a $29 screen replacement?
jejb said:
How do you get a $29 screen replacement?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Verizon insurance for 13 bucks a month. Unlimited screen repair on supported devices.
Semantics said:
Verizon insurance for 13 bucks a month. Unlimited screen repair on supported devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish we had that here,i can get device protection from rogers but it has a deductible each time and its over 100
Semantics said:
Verizon insurance for 13 bucks a month. Unlimited screen repair on supported devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, gotcha'. When I look at that, though, I also add in the $13 a month for a total cost of $341 over 2 years, including one screen replacement. Not saying it's a ripoff or anything. I have used my insurance and was glad to have it. I just like to look at the total cost.
Many thanks for the link to that review, it puts my mind at rest.
I don't use screen protectors because I always use use a folding case - never broken a screen yet.
Face unlocking is there. But I believe it uses just the camera no special sensor. I presume
pbp123454321 said:
Face unlocking is there. But I believe it uses just the camera no special sensor. I presume
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes so not secure at all like the S10 plus..totally useless.
They really should have left the retina scanner on the newer stuff....losing that is a problem.
force70 said:
Yes so not secure at all like the S10 plus..totally useless.
They really should have left the retina scanner on the newer stuff....losing that is a problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree! I even think note 9 was hands down the best true note phone the made.
The ultrasonic FP sensor is not an improved one or 2nd gen. or something, it's the same one used in the s10 series, now placed up.
pbp123454321 said:
I totally agree! I even think note 9 was hands down the best true note phone the made.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I agree with you. I went from a nexus with it in the back as well, then the moto fingerprint reader at the base in the front to the back, and now it's going to the front again. I'm 80% sure I've disliked each transition but thelis iteration makes me the most nervous. The only thing I like about Apple is the Face ID as it's very quick. Though I don't like having my phone unlocked each time I pull it out. Plus, my work has strict security rules for keeping locked.
Virgo_Guy said:
The ultrasonic FP sensor is not an improved one or 2nd gen. or something, it's the same one used in the s10 series, now placed up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well thats not good because it sucked on the S10 plus and is the main reason i got rid of it.
I could have a very short stay on the Note 10 plus if it is as bad....unfortunate since its an amazing device but being able to reliably and consistently unlock your device on the 1st attempt is a basic feature.
zedwards said:
Yes, I agree with you. I went from a nexus with it in the back as well, then the moto fingerprint reader at the base in the front to the back, and now it's going to the front again. I'm 80% sure I've disliked each transition but thelis iteration makes me the most nervous. The only thing I like about Apple is the Face ID as it's very quick. Though I don't like having my phone unlocked each time I pull it out. Plus, my work has strict security rules for keeping locked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Business requires it to be locked?? Omg remember the nexus with the stars back, was totally ahead of its time! I loved it. I'm actually getting use to the fingerprint and face unlock of the note, has tons of settings, and not to let it unlock after recognizing the face
pbp123454321 said:
Business requires it to be locked?? Omg remember the nexus with the stars back, was totally ahead of its time! I loved it. I'm actually getting use to the fingerprint and face unlock of the note, has tons of settings, and not to let it unlock after recognizing the face
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, in order for me to have work email on my phone, corporate security policy requires using a pin with 7 numbers/letters and not just 4, or using a fingerprint reader, but no face unlock. Fun stuff.
Nexus had such a great fp reader! Was pretty responsive and the same place as the note 9. Will need to get used to maybe using my thumb now?
zedwards said:
Yes, in order for me to have work email on my phone, corporate security policy requires using a pin with 7 numbers/letters and not just 4, or using a fingerprint reader, but no face unlock. Fun stuff.
Nexus had such a great fp reader! Was pretty responsive and the same place as the note 9. Will need to get used to maybe using my thumb now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wow, what secrets do u have on your phone lol. I'm talking about the nexus 4 but ur right! I had the 5x and loved it !! The gestures too felt so intuitive not a gimmick.. I'm use to it already. Took like 2 days lol. I wish the punch hole was in the corner tho. But it is what it be
The fingerprint reader on my Note 10+ is terrible!
It often doesn't recognise 4 or 5 attempts in a row, then locking me out from further biometrical login and I have to use my PIN to get into my phone.
I was kind of expecting for this forum to be full of this problem. Is it only me then?
naujoks said:
The fingerprint reader on my Note 10+ is terrible!
It often doesn't recognise 4 or 5 attempts in a row, then locking me out from further biometrical login and I have to use my PIN to get into my phone.
I was kind of expecting for this forum to be full of this problem. Is it only me then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Update to Official Android 10 , and re-write your review after doing that ! :good:
Also look arround for threads regarding some tricks to get a "beter" fingerprint registration
I am on Android 10 already.
It already starts when registering a fingerprint. It constantly says "Press a little harder" when I'm already pressing my thumb right through the screen.
It got that bad after Samsung published the update after people found out their ****ty fingerprint sensor can be fooled by having a screen protector on.
Since then, my fingerprint sensor has been pretty much all but useless.
Your not alone its crappy they should of kept it on the back
im very dissapointed with that fingerprint sensor on my predecessor p30 pro is it shame.. slow and inaccurate, maybe This is due to plastic foil but thats Thinnest foil What ever exists
It only works well if your fingers are little moisturized. Otherwise, it failed often
Yep, I have dry skin and that makes it extremely difficult for the scanner.
magichoward said:
Your not alone its crappy they should of kept it on the back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man honestly I wish they would have put the scanner in the power button like on th Huawei mate30 pro
Yes it's rubbish. Worst fingerpront scanner on any phone I've owned. The poor scanner, dropped calls and scrolling issues stop this phone from being 10/10. All very big problems too. I would have kept my Note 8 and not bought this phone had I known.
I just don't use it, lol. Actually I don't use any lock screen at all, not even swipe. I find them annoying. I hide all my stuff in Termux which the average user or theif wouldn't think to look, or even know what they are looking at, lol. I could always lock it or erase it remotely with a few clicks on Google. As long as it's turned on and connected to the internet.
Try this
Register 2 fingerprints only for the same finger with many angles as you can,its worked well for me
I've stopped using the fingerprint scanner altogether and now use facial recognitiong (quick) which works flawlessly.
Hi,
I'm coming from Note9. Fingerprint scanner was on the back. It also had iris scanner.
So dry or wet finger, day or night - I was able to unlock my Note9 from the first try with 100% probability.
Can't say about S2 Ultra.
Faceunlock - works only in ideal conditions (face in front of the camera, well lit etc.).
Fingerprint - most of the time I unlock it from 1-3 tries. And yes.. I rescanned my fingers many times. Same result.
What is your experience?
Coming from a Note 10+ the fingerprint reader works great; it is much more responsive than the Note 10+. I don't use face unlock (I haven't used it since the Galaxy Nexus), so I can't talk to that. I'm not comfortable using face unlock. It is still less secure than fingerprint or a PIN. I don't care what Apple or Samsung says.
I did like the iris scanner on my Note 8. Though, I am not sure how secure it was.
I have no issues with fingerprint....works mostly first time....sometimes when finger is wet I need a 2nd try....Face unlock works okay most of the time....lighting conditions do play a roll....especially bad if the room is dark and a light shine from behind....overall much better then my previous samsung phones
termdj said:
overall much better then my previous samsung phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good for you. What previous Samsung phone did you have?
It's really worse than Note9. But Note9 had different tech (iris scanner and not ordinary front facing camera, hardware finger print scanner and not under the screen scanner).
I had the s5,s6+,s9,s10 and s21 ultra...on my previous phones I made sure to scan one finger into multiple fingers, so it had 5 copies of my finger... that helped mostly with it reading my finger print the first time.. saw a video on it on YouTube. With the s22 ultra I only have one fingerprint registered and works great...i did make sure i scan it from all angles and sides... also video on YouTube...
Faceunlock much worth than OnePlus.
termdj said:
I had the s5,s6+,s9,s10 and s21 ultra...on my previous phones I made sure to scan one finger into multiple fingers, so it had 5 copies of my finger... that helped mostly with it reading my finger print the first time.. saw a video on it on YouTube. With the s22 ultra I only have one fingerprint registered and works great...i did make sure i scan it from all angles and sides... also video on YouTube...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S22 Ultra lets scan only 4 fingers. So 2 times right and left thumb.
I suggest doing 1 finger on all 4...it worked for me on the previous phones
I used both thumbs for setting up one fingerprint. Did this for all four fingerprint options, so each process has both thumbs registered and it went on for four times. Did this fun and not necessarily to make sure to recognise better.
Both thumbs work as intended. Doesn't work when wet or with pruney fingers.
I don't use face recognition because of no security and "ideal condition" requirement. It's neither IRIS scanning nor super secure face id.
bat0nas said:
Hi,
I'm coming from Note9. Fingerprint scanner was on the back. It also had iris scanner.
So dry or wet finger, day or night - I was able to unlock my Note9 from the first try with 100% probability.
Can't say about S2 Ultra.
Faceunlock - works only in ideal conditions (face in front of the camera, well lit etc.).
Fingerprint - most of the time I unlock it from 1-3 tries. And yes.. I rescanned my fingers many times. Same result.
What is your experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S22u fingerprints recognized 80% of the time. I have set up one thumb and one index finger. I wish the fingerprint reader was on the power button like the z Fold 3 which worked about 98% of the time.
I do not use face unlock.
The FPR for me works about 99% of the time. If a finger was wet that's typically the only time it doesn't work. I use face unlock secondary. Also works great.
I came from a pixel 6 pro, where the FPR was total garbage. It's nice having a phone you can actually unlock with a fingerprint lol.
gettinwicked said:
The FPR for me works about 99% of the time. If a finger was wet that's typically the only time it doesn't work. I use face unlock secondary. Also works great.
I came from a pixel 6 pro, where the FPR was total garbage. It's nice having a phone you can actually unlock with a fingerprint lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, 99% success with FPR - that seems a little high. Try turning off face unlock and see what percent success you get with just FPR. Not sure if it goes immediately to face unlock on the 1st failed attempt with the FPR. If it does, face unlock is very fast and may be masking the failed FPR attempts.
Rubby1025 said:
Wow, 99% success with FPR - that seems a little high. Try turning off face unlock and see what percent success you get with just FPR. Not sure if it goes immediately to face unlock on the 1st failed attempt with the FPR. If it does, face unlock is very fast and may be masking the failed FPR attempts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting about 99% with the fingerprint reader and I am not using face recognition.
At least 90%-95% success rate with FPR.
I'm not using face unlock
Virgo_Guy said:
I used both thumbs for setting up one fingerprint. Did this for all four fingerprint options, so each process has both thumbs registered and it went on for four times. Did this fun and not necessarily to make sure to recognise better.
Both thumbs work as intended. Doesn't work when wet or with pruney fingers.
I don't use face recognition because of no security and "ideal condition" requirement. It's neither IRIS scanning nor super secure face id.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did both thumbs and both forefingers using one fingerprint entry. I saw it on youtube and couldn't believe it. I'm not talking about adding one fingerprint completely and then hitting add. Example, start with your thumb and just register part of it, then use a forefinger, another thumb, another forefinger, keep alternating until it hits 100%. Works perfectly.
bat0nas said:
Fingerprint - most of the time I unlock it from 1-3 tries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same experience. Works very fast but probability of unlock is 90% or so. And this is supposedly a good result for the scanner which is behind the screen. My previous phone was OnePlus 3T with a fingerprint scanner inside a button - unlock speed was the same (instant) but unlock probability was something like 99.99%. This is called progress...
I use both thumbs for unlocking which works around 90% of the time.
With face unlocking I have normal and alternative appearance set so this typically works before I can even use my fingerprints.
Inconsistent at best. Still better than the fingerprint on my Pixel 6 Pro. But face recognition belongs to the iPhone.
bat0nas said:
Hi,
I'm coming from Note9. Fingerprint scanner was on the back. It also had iris scanner.
So dry or wet finger, day or night - I was able to unlock my Note9 from the first try with 100% probability.
Can't say about S2 Ultra.
Faceunlock - works only in ideal conditions (face in front of the camera, well lit etc.).
Fingerprint - most of the time I unlock it from 1-3 tries. And yes.. I rescanned my fingers many times. Same result.
What is your experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a new S22 and my experience is so frustrating. I am coming back to samsung after few generations from huawei (mate 20 pro and P30 Pro). What I can't digest is the fingerprint and face id works so flawlessly on the Huawei which is relatively newcomer than Samsung and they have done it so perfectly. (on Mate 20 Pro it used 3D scan and on P30 Pro 2D scan). Samsung with all its generations with the many decades of experience still struggles.
Fingerprint is too slow and sometimes after a few tries. Face ID takes a while to open the screen. And what more - when i enable fingerprint - for some reason the face ID just becomes lazy, I don't see it even attempting to detect the face (from the rim light effect on front camera). It looks as though the fingerprint has superceded the face id. I am getting more and more frustrated by this. I did try scanning both fingerprint and face id several times. But no luck. I even suspected probably there is a way to prioritize the usage of biometrics and looked for it but there is none.
In contrast on my Huawei - it just takes fraction of a second to unlock as though it is not scanning the id (both face and fingerprint) but actually it does the job so quickly. What is happening here - is this how samsung had been all these years? I can't believe if they say they've improved from previous generations. Why is the face id so slow and most times (well lit environment as well - the face id is not at work at all (no rim light around front camera, as though the id is not at work)
Is this the same experience others have and is normal for Samsung? Do you all think it is a one off case and a reset might fix it?
I find it almost as smooth as IPhone 13. Both fingerprint and face recognition work well together, probably @ 98% unlock efficiency. with official samsung screen protector