Database Info

[Q] Does BlackJelly Rom work on Verizon S3?

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1883845
does this rom work with the verizon s3? I could not find it in Verizon thread. The ROM looks great so far.

No. Do not flash ROMs from other carriers on your phone. It WILL result in a brick.
Covered many times...please search next time.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

It actually wouldnt brick your device as the rom doesnt flash any radios. It might not boot, but it wouldnt brick it. The ATT version of the rom (which is based off the tmo leak) works unmodified (kernel and all) with the tmo version. I have a version in both the ATT and TMO forums and the rom is exactly the same except for the model number in the build.prop. However, I'm not sure it will work on the CDMA variant.

tomalrocks said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1883845
does this rom work with the verizon s3? I could not find it in Verizon thread. The ROM looks great so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like what graffixnyc said, the only differences are in the build.prop. Just add the CDMA specific values to the build.prop in BlackJelly (be sure to remove the GSM stuff). Also, take the apns-conf.xml from one of our ROMs like Synergy or CleanROM and replace the one in BlackJelly. That should get you booting.
Marcismo55 said:
No. Do not flash ROMs from other carriers on your phone. It WILL result in a brick.
Covered many times...please search next time.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say just stay away from the ROMs in the i9300 forums. But even those wouldn't give you a hard brick. I know...I've purposely tried to do it by installing Omega and Foxhound.

Thank you for clarifying guys.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

graffixnyc said:
It actually wouldnt brick your device as the rom doesnt flash any radios. It might not boot, but it wouldnt brick it. The ATT version of the rom (which is based off the tmo leak) works unmodified (kernel and all) with the tmo version. I have a version in both the ATT and TMO forums and the rom is exactly the same except for the model number in the build.prop. However, I'm not sure it will work on the CDMA variant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even so I'd be really careful saying that. Someone may read that and think it's fine to flash stuff from other threads while in fact it is really dangerous. The OP only has a few posts so this may apply to him too (no offense, there are some people who read on here all the time and just don't bother with an account until they need to, I'm just sayin)

Hey guys,
I just ported over the BlackJelly ROM the OP requested and will be posting it here for people to use. Since I am pretty much caught up in other projects, both IRL and on XDA (AOSP), this ROM won't be receiving much support as I'd like to give it so I welcome anyone to take the port and make it better. And please, no smartass comments like this:
tml478 said:
Don't let the haters win. If other people want to complain because you released a better product then them then so be it. Android is open source for a reason and you made something that's amazing and I for one really appreciate it. Maybe the haters should get back in the kitchen and try to release something that even comes close to this. Keep up the good work and thanks a lot.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"If other people want to complain because you released a better product then them then so be it." Like... seriously? Read the #1 rule of XDA:
1. Search before posting.
Use one of our search functions before posting, whether you have a question or something new to share, it's very likely someone already asked that question or shared that news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FORUM RULES
________________________________________________
HOWEVER, if you do want me to support it fully by abandoning other XDA projects and provide updates on the original developer's behalf, let me know. Of course, I will only provide full support if graffixnyc is okay with me doing it.
The build WILL most likely have bugs, some major, some minor, but that is for everyone to fix. I think this will be a good learning tool as well. Oh and if you already weren't aware, you can use kernels from the other carriers. AFAIK, the kernels are common among all carriers (not including the international kernels) so flash away!
Before we get to the download link, MAJOR props and thanks to graffixnyc for BlackJelly ROM. It's great!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
DOWNLOAD
BlackJelly VZW​

PureMotive said:
Like what graffixnyc said, the only differences are in the build.prop. Just add the CDMA specific values to the build.prop in BlackJelly (be sure to remove the GSM stuff). Also, take the apns-conf.xml from one of our ROMs like Synergy or CleanROM and replace the one in BlackJelly. That should get you booting.
I'd say just stay away from the ROMs in the i9300 forums. But even those wouldn't give you a hard brick. I know...I've purposely tried to do it by installing Omega and Foxhound.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I imagine you changed the update-script in it then. The partition difference would brick you for sure. I know several of the two and a half bagillion people that hard bricked did it with omega specifically. And why would you try to brick these. Unless you have a jtag setup or something i don't see the point

billard412 said:
I imagine you changed the update-script in it then. The partition difference would brick you for sure. I know several of the two and a half bagillion people that hard bricked did it with omega specifically. And why would you try to brick these. Unless you have a jtag setup or something i don't see the point
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't change them. I may have been lucky or something, but I kept the ROM as is and installed it and didn't end up with a hard brick. Regardless, moral of the story is to stay away from i9300 ROMs unless someone makes a successful port.
I was trying to brick the phone for testing purposes.

Jelly Bean Official OTA Approved by Verizon

Please be informed the VRBLK3 has just been approved by Verizon as the official Jelly Bean OTA build.
Details + Support Documentation - ETA 12/14/2012 (This Friday)
Spread the word and tell your friends to get theirs early here.
Update: We aren’t sure why, but Verizon just changed the support docs back to a previous update. We’ll keep an eye on it and see what happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
News

Those PDF files don't mention anything about jellybean k3. They are for the HE version. And I don't think jellybean will only be a 62mb update
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

http://www.droid-life.com/2012/12/12/verizon-approves-jelly-bean-update-for-galaxy-s3/

I take it this one and the leak that are the same exact numbers are 100% identical with no changes whatsoever?

Droid life just tweeted this, not sure what it means.
Verizon just changed the Galaxy S3 JB support doc back to some old minor update.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

I'm sure it's just vzw's "oops" moment. I'm still sure we'll see it this week. Fingers crossed.

Absolute failure by Verizon. Verizon's list of features has typos and they don't have a damn clue what Google Now is! C'mon man!
'Verizon Wireless is pleased to announce a new software updrade.' Really?
And why is the Google Now screenshot labled as Google Plus?
Furthermore, why do all the screenshots contain on screen soft keys? WTF Verizon!?
Obviously, Verizon has no clue about software and the Android OS. Makes me wonder why the updates take so long!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

maybe we are getting vanilla android too

bobAbooE said:
maybe we are getting vanilla android too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol no. 2 of the screenshots have touchwiz UI
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

Indeed I've been posting since DroidLife emailed the news. I believe I even told my mailman ...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium

Wait, they approved the latest leak? The one with the broken help?...
Does this mean it will not be fixed in this ota?

salas2324 said:
Lol no. 2 of the screenshots have touchwiz UI
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. Poking fun at their photoshop fail on the onsvreen keys.

Dudenell said:
Wait, they approved the latest leak? The one with the broken help?...
Does this mean it will not be fixed in this ota?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Broken help was actually a bug in my previous prep method for the leaks. I have fixed that on the last leak as of 12/10. Refer to the new K3 No-Wipe Fixed image in my thread.

Wonder if this would fix the home button going back to home screen when screen itself is off. That or if its already been fixed by a dev I'll take it.

IF, IF , IF this really happens..... I am rooted and unlocked, thats it. Will I still be able to get the OTA update? If no, what do I need to do to get the OTA when it is rolled out?
Thanks in advance
Heather

putney1477 said:
IF, IF , IF this really happens..... I am rooted and unlocked, thats it. Will I still be able to get the OTA update? If no, what do I need to do to get the OTA when it is rolled out?
Thanks in advance
Heather
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will only show you OTA if you have the official build (last OTA version was VRALHE). If you flashed any of my earlier leaks you won't get the OTA and will have to flash VRBLK3 manually from my thread. Otherwise you will get the OTA and it will just remove root and relock your bootloader.
The ironic thing is that in order to reroot and unlock your bootloader after the OTA you have to reflash VRBLK3 manually from my guide anyways so if you're looking to keep root, custom recovery, or unlocked bootloader after the OTA, just don't bother with the OTA and follow the guide from my thread to get on the OTA early.

open1your1eyes0 said:
It will only show you OTA if you have the official build (last OTA version was VRALHE). If you flashed any of my earlier leaks you won't get the OTA and will have to flash VRBLK3 manually from my thread. Otherwise you will get the OTA and it will just remove root and relock your bootloader.
The ironic thing is that in order to reroot and unlock your bootloader after the OTA you have to reflash VRBLK3 manually from my guide anyways so if you're looking to keep root, custom recovery, or unlocked bootloader after the OTA, just don't bother with the OTA and follow the guide from my thread to get on the OTA early.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually i think it will only show the ota if you have the stock recovery. if you flashed CWR or TWR then you will have to wait until one of the devs here root it for us. or odin back to stock and upgrade from there.

So those of us who have been on the K3 leak have been on the OTA? Or is there a chance they'll make additional changes to the OTA...?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

There will b no changes they have decided after testing. . I hope... they don't get all jumpy and add things at the last minute that would b 6 months from now if they wanted anything changed.. unless it was critical.
s3 driving an S4

putney1477 said:
IF, IF , IF this really happens..... I am rooted and unlocked, thats it. Will I still be able to get the OTA update? If no, what do I need to do to get the OTA when it is rolled out?
Thanks in advance
Heather
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you point me in the direction of your guide? Nevermind, it was right under my nose
Please and thanks

[FULL DUMP] GT-I9505G (Google Edition) *UPDATED With Flashable ZIP

Details
User @donovanbrock has uploaded the COMPLETE dump for the GT-I9505G (Google Edition). The dump also includes original PIT, modems (UEUAMFD), and bootloader. This dump is different from the previously leaked dump that many roms were baked from.
Note: this is not yet flashable via ODIN
OP will be updated when new info arises
Download (Dump)
Original
Mirror 1
Mirror 2
Update
A flashable zip of this latest leak has recently became available.
Download (Flashable Zip) Thanks @Jah0n @Trev420
See here (at&t notes & download source) and here (t-mobile notes)
Don't forget to hit the
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
button
source

Thumbs way up. I was wondering when a CLEAN ge rom was going to hit. Everyone has their own version of the GE ROM with their own little "fixes" and signatures all over the meta data.
Now, with that said, will this actually make our AT&T GS4 phones exact replicas of GE? As in, OTA pushed from the settings menu?

mr_blanket said:
will this actually make our AT&T GS4 phones exact replicas of GE? As in, OTA pushed from the settings menu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This has yet to be determined. Hopefully we'll find out very soon :good:

It'd be amazing if we could get a different boot loader like this with this new info! Assuming mf3 users aren't included.
Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2

mr_blanket said:
Now, with that said, will this actually make our AT&T GS4 phones exact replicas of GE? As in, OTA pushed from the settings menu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too am awaiting to convert my 32GB i337 into the GT-i9505G. As if purchased right from Google's little play ground.:cyclops:
I wish we had the availability of whatever the OEM uses when the phones are coming off the assembly line. Hardware is identical, and forks pretty much to be flashed in either direction, then they slap some identifying bar codes on them.
ERASE i337, and install i9505G, partitioned corrections and all.

It is flasheable on a i9505 ?

LOLWUT they completely removed se linux from the kernel

Might have to put linux back on this beast and see whats up

Scan I flash this to my I9505 with no problems ?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

abdmid said:
Scan I flash this to my I9505 with no problems ?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet.. wait till further research from the knowledge devs.
Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2

I'm excited. I'm going to try flashing these bootloaders to the i337 once I get that JTAG box (still in transit - stuck in Germany now? -_-)

Definitely gonna give this a flash when its confirmed safe
Sent from my SGH-I337 using xda premium

come on devs, i want pure google not modified nexus roms +32gb storage

Fully flash-able with i337
Hello, just wondering if this is fully flash-able with the att i337? I know its probably a dumb question just want to make sure. I would like to thank all the devs for developing roms and kernels and such, I got into flashing roms when the evo came out and ever since then always had to have the top android phone out there. since the evo iv had the sensation, galaxy s 4g, galaxy s2, s3, note, note 2 and s4 the only reason im asking this question is because (htc set aside) this is the first galaxy that ive had that had locked bootloader (i believe) and every so often when flashing a rom i get a Kernel source error so i just end up flashing a Ktoonez kernel and 99% of the time fixes the problem. im using twrpr recovery and would like to use CWM but do wanna lose my back ups from previous roms, again, sorry for going on and on and really do appreciate all the devs work. Ive had an xda account for a while but didnt post much so sorry for having 2 questions in one also would appreciate it if someone could be so kind as to point me in the right direction where i could donate to the devs.
thanks
:good:

No one flash this unless you want a possible brick.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2

this may be flashable via heimdall, though I'll wait for the devs to inform us first.

Interesting. AMFD modem. I wonder if the modem will be flashable since it seems a newer revision than AMF3 on regular SGH-I337's.
Hopefully the full dump will help in researching work arounds for the locked bootloader.

WoodburyMan said:
Interesting. AMFD modem. I wonder if the modem will be flashable since it seems a newer revision than AMF3 on regular SGH-I337's.
Hopefully the full dump will help in researching work arounds for the locked bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the amf3 modem was the latest modem for 1337? Am I confusing myself here?

Capt said:
I thought the amf3 modem was the latest modem for 1337? Am I confusing myself here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is the latest for the i337 but with the leak there is a new leaked modem which I'm not sure is or will work for the 337 device.
Sent from my SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2

Capt said:
I thought the amf3 modem was the latest modem for 1337? Am I confusing myself here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. AMF3 is currently the latest official modem from AT&T/Samsung for I337. The Modem in this is AMFD, which by the numbering scheme seems newer. Compatible: No idea but newer it seems.

Should I root my note 5?

Just wondering if I should root my note 5

lolwhat? said:
Just wondering if I should root my note 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uhm....if you ask that questions than probably not. if you don't have a reason to do it then don't do it.

Yes

Chord_Hugo87 said:
uhm....if you ask that questions than probably not. if you don't have a reason to do it then don't do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.

Why do you feel you should ask if you should root your Note 5?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Well since once I root it will trip the Knox and wondering if it's worth it princeasi

Do you realize what you gain and what you lose from rooting? Make a list, weigh the pros and cons. Only you can make that decision.
Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

Honestly as of now there isn't much to root for and this phone flies as is. I'm personally waiting to see what else our devs come up with. And I want to try Samsung Pay which you can't use if you root

ThC23 said:
Honestly as of now there isn't much to root for and this phone flies as is. I'm personally waiting to see what else our devs come up with. And I want to try Samsung Pay which you can't use if you root
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a silly statement....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

ThC23 said:
Honestly as of now there isn't much to root for and this phone flies as is. I'm personally waiting to see what else our devs come up with. And I want to try Samsung Pay which you can't use if you root
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wha what ? :silly:
- AdAway
- Amplify
- Disable Application [ROOT]
- Greenify
- Wanam
- Xposed
- YouTubeAdAway
Those above apps are key for me to run on any Android phone.
And then ThrashROM 3.4 + Arty97 kernel 5.0 beta = fastest Android phone ever, with 6h Screen On time easily.

lolwhat? said:
Well since once I root it will trip the Knox and wondering if it's worth it princeasi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you think it's worth tripping Knox for root? For this phone, I dont, but some others might differ. what are your thoughts about it?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

ThC23 said:
Honestly as of now there isn't much to root for and this phone flies as is. I'm personally waiting to see what else our devs come up with. And I want to try Samsung Pay which you can't use if you root
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a lie. The stock carrier ROM is laggy compared to the Thrasher Lite ROM. Battery life is better i=with a custom ROM as well.

iScott78 said:
That's a lie. The stock carrier ROM is laggy compared to the Thrasher Lite ROM. Battery life is better i=with a custom ROM as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is the battery life better on Thrasher Rom?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

princeasi said:
Why is the battery life better on Thrasher Rom?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably because it is slimmed down and using arter kernel fixes the memory issue.

I'm currently on the same boat. My main reason for root is Greenify which turned my 3hr SOT on my OnePlus 2 to 4hs. I also hate, HATE the Samsung UI. If only there was a way to get the same Notification UI from stock Android and put it in the Galaxy Note. I am also conflicted on whether it's worth it to lose Samsung Pay.

keithleyson said:
I'm currently on the same boat. My main reason for root is Greenify which turned my 3hr SOT on my OnePlus 2 to 4hs. I also hate, HATE the Samsung UI. If only there was a way to get the same Notification UI from stock Android and put it in the Galaxy Note. I am also conflicted on whether it's worth it to lose Samsung Pay.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am in the same situation, only haven't used samsung pay once since getting the phone. Once I get my rebates that involve pay, it's rooted. Been trying to stay stock, just to see if I can and honestly, it's not too bad but not good enough to keep it this way. Resale value will most likely be less but so be it.

Ducter said:
I am in the same situation, only haven't used samsung pay once since getting the phone. Once I get my rebates that involve pay, it's rooted. Been trying to stay stock, just to see if I can and honestly, it's not too bad but not good enough to keep it this way. Resale value will most likely be less but so be it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I rooted a few minutes after posting here. The new method does not trip Knox so it's cool. It's all thanks to the new beta SuperSU.

keithleyson said:
Well I rooted a few minutes after posting here. The new method does not trip Knox so it's cool. It's all thanks to the new beta SuperSU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess I need to keep up with changes, last I knew couldn't root without flashing custom recovery, which trips knox. If you can root without tripping then no reason not to imo.

keithleyson said:
Well I rooted a few minutes after posting here. The new method does not trip Knox so it's cool. It's all thanks to the new beta SuperSU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How? Is there a guide somewhere?

jrock79 said:
How? Is there a guide somewhere?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't found a way either, not without flashing a custom recovery.

Custom ROM and Kernel

A9 owners speak up!! This is for all A9 owners and would be A9 owners who would love to see development of AOSP and CM based ROMS. GPE port from the M8 and any other ROMS. As well custom Kernels like ElementalX. Thanks to @jcase we have S-off, modified boot image for disabling forced encryption and allowing root and @Chainfire we have SuperSu and @Captain_Throwback and @Dees_Troy we have TWRP. A million thanks to all involved in the development so far. I would just love to get a feel for how many users out there are waiting for and would help support the development of custom ROMS and kernels! Let the wishful thinking be heard :good:
Also love to hear from developers! Progress, status updates etc etc
UPDATE: First ROM is now here! Thanks to @Captain_Throwback Located here!!! http://forum.xda-developers.com/one...9-base-roms-recovery-flashable-t3282335/page4

I wil definitly would love some customs kernel

I am waiting for this from Beginning. Can not wait anymore. .
:laugh::good:
Thanks

Okkkayy!! So I knew the fan base for this device was low compared to say the M7 and M8 but didn't realize it was this low Expected to hear WAY more than this!!

I've been waiting as well.
Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

Yep. I'm ready for CM 13
Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

Just now getting an OTA.. Not sure what it's for..?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

crowsnestitsupport said:
Just now getting an OTA.. Not sure what it's for..? View attachment 3587337
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
waiting for custom roms...
what kind of features contains this update?

JochenP said:
waiting for custom roms...
what kind of features contains this update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still booting!! Will post photos shortly

crowsnestitsupport said:
Just now getting an OTA.. Not sure what it's for..? View attachment 3587337
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC!!! Good to their word! Just got 6.0.1!! [/ATTACH]

It would be good to get some CM development up and running.

What's new in this 6.0.1 ? ??

Will972 said:
What's new in this 6.0.1 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, one thing I don't like is that it now requires your pattern or pin to unlock the device after a reboot where as before after a reboot it would unlock with the just the finger print reader It can now read the new 6.0.1 emoji-cons but still cant send them. They just don't show up in the keyboard. I want to pop my verizon SIM into it and see if anything changed there. Still testing otherwise. Haven't noticed that much else.

crowsnestitsupport said:
Well, one thing I don't like is that it now requires your pattern or pin to unlock the device after a reboot where as before after a reboot it would unlock with the just the finger print reader It can now read the new 6.0.1 emoji-cons but still cant send them. They just don't show up in the keyboard. I want to pop my verizon SIM into it and see if anything changed there. Still testing otherwise. Haven't noticed that much else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Soo, no changes on verizon.. Still shows LTE logo with no bars and LTE data works but to voice or text. With AT&T however, VoLTE seems to now be working on all calls, not just other users on AT&T on iPhone 6's and 6s's which is very exciting!! LTE works during all phone calls.. See screen shots.

What about a bounty for a custom rom ?

Why do you think we are here on XDA?!?! Of course we want custom Roms and Kernels!!!!
Thanks

rlvl said:
It would be good to get some CM development up and running.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a deoxed android would be great fo exposed.

techlogik said:
Why do you think we are here on XDA?!?! Of course we want custom Roms and Kernels!!!!
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course!! I wasn't doubting that I was looking to see what kind of support for it was out there and judging by the posts here there is very very little

crowsnestitsupport said:
A9 owners speak up!! This is for all A9 owners and would be A9 owners who would love to see development of AOSP and CM based ROMS. GPE port from the M8 and any other ROMS. As well custom Kernels like ElementalX. Thanks to @jcase we have S-off, modified boot image for disabling forced encryption and allowing root and @Chainfire we have SuperSu and @Dees_Troy we have TWRP. A million thanks to all involved in the development so far. I would just love to get a feel for how many users out there are waiting for and would help support the development of custom ROMS and kernels! Let the wishful thinking be heard :good:
Also love to hear from developers! Progress, status updates etc etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought I was the OP of the A9 TWRP thread, not @Dees_Troy?
(or course without him, we wouldn't have TWRP at all)
I'm surprised there aren't at least any stock rooted ROMs floating around the Development forum. I did post one earlier today in someone else's thread, but I'm not sure how much exposure that's going to get. As far as AOSP ROMs go, the good thing is that there is a bit less Sense on the A9 than on previous devices (more like a GPE device), so hopefully that'll make porting CM to it less cumbersome.

Captain_Throwback said:
I thought I was the OP of the A9 TWRP thread, not @Dees_Troy?
(of course without him, we wouldn't have TWRP at all)
I'm surprised there aren't at least any stock rooted ROMs floating around the Development forum. I did post one earlier today in someone else's thread, but I'm not sure how much exposure that's going to get. As far as AOSP ROMs go, the good thing is that there is a bit less Sense on the A9 than on previous devices (more like a GPE device), so hopefully that'll make porting CM to it less cumbersome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, of course!! my bad. Its why I have the little thing at the end that says (thanks to "all" involved in the development so far) not trying to take credit from anyone!!
Yes, I definitely appreciate the more stock google look and feel of the A9 but its no substitute for a pure GPE or CM ROM!