Database Info

[Q] Samsung Galaxy 3 quadrant benchmarks

Hello everybody. I have a Samsung Galaxy I5800 and the quadrant result was 339. Is that good?

That sounds really low actually. If you use the quadrant standard app it will show you your benchmark in relation to other phones to give you an idea of where you're at.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

yes, you are right. Actually I did a little research my self and I found that this number is pretty much low even for my phone itself (without comparing to better phones at all)

That is very low to give you an idea my phones benchmark is at 1847
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Synthetic benchmarks, especially one as crap and easily manipulated as Quadrant, will tell you nothing about how the phone feels in real life.
It's like how the manufacturers want to put dual core cpus in their phones so that they can add more and more bloatware. The device will score high in a benchmark but will be significantly slower than a single core running a vanilla ROM.

monokoter said:
That is very low to give you an idea my phones benchmark is at 1847
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not possible. Apparently you don't have a galaxy 3.

DirkGently1 said:
Synthetic benchmarks, especially one as crap and easily manipulated as Quadrant, will tell you nothing about how the phone feels in real life.
It's like how the manufacturers want to put dual core cpus in their phones so that they can add more and more bloatware. The device will score high in a benchmark but will be significantly slower than a single core running a vanilla ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I know and I totally agree with you. This is not only in cellphones. In computer's world things are much more worse. But I only use this app to have an overall idea of my phone potential, since I have installed the latest version of 2.2, deleted lots of stuff I didn't need and installed only a few absolutely necessary aftermarket applications, and yet my phone is relatively slow according to what I see over the net.

In another tread of xda I saw some numbers of what is considered to be a good result for galaxy 3 and it's over 500. Almost 550. So I'm now definitely sure that's there is something wrong with my phone since it only scores 330.
So, I'd like to know if there is any way to make it a bit better?

No I don't have a SG3 I Have Captivate and even before I tweeked this phone I still scored upper 900. This phone is only rooted with stock froyo and it is fast as hell so I decided to stay away from third party roms for now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

AWESOME! These are looking great

monokoter said:
No I don't have a SG3 I Have Captivate and even before I tweeked this phone I still scored upper 900. This phone is only rooted with stock froyo and it is fast as hell so I decided to stay away from third party roms for now.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trust me, it's not third party ROMs that make a phone slow. Mine scored that low from the very first moment I flashed the os. Before installing anything but quadrant.

So, any other ideas?

Anyone ???

Quadrant isn't reliable. You shouldn't worry about it. If you are satisfied with your phone then that's that.
In reference to third-party roms, they are usually designed to be much faster than stock actually. You might want to consider finding one for your phone to give it a boost.
Sent from my MIUI SCH-i500

sageDieu said:
Quadrant isn't reliable. You shouldn't worry about it. If you are satisfied with your phone then that's that.
In reference to third-party roms, they are usually designed to be much faster than stock actually. You might want to consider finding one for your phone to give it a boost.
Sent from my MIUI SCH-i500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I'm not satisfied with my phone at all. That's why I started this thread. It's slow, it has glitches, apps crash occasionally and generally it's unpredictable. For example, double twist, the app I used instead of the built in player, starts playing by itself quite often, while it not even on running apps list...

I have a captivate running firefly 3.0. I was getting 2100 with eclair. 1800 with froyo. Now in the 1300 range. Firefly is definitely garter even though the scores don't show it. I have zero lag now. I dint think the benchmark scores are that reliable.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk

If you use the quadrant standard app it will show you your benchmark in relation to other phones to give you an idea of where you're at

will test this soon, looks like a very nice build, keep up the good work

My blade on CM7 goes to 900+

Moving on to MT4g

Hey everyone just wanted to say thanks for the great support and the awesome custom roms, I know that none of you know me, just wanted to say thanks!
Moving on to Mytouch 4g tomorrow

shazam1203 said:
Hey everyone just wanted to say thanks for the great support and the awesome custom roms, I know that none of you know me, just wanted to say thanks!
Moving on to Mytouch 4g tomorrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you downgrade? Thats retarded. Your going from a 1ghz Dualcore Tegra to a 1ghz Singlecore snapdragon? Have fun downgrading. Most smart people upgrade a device not a downgrade.

AndroidBotx said:
Why would you downgrade? Thats retarded. Your going from a 1ghz Dualcore Tegra to a 1ghz Singlecore snapdragon? Have fun downgrading. Most smart people upgrade a device not a downgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a very naive thing to say. Yes, the MT4G has a single core. But it's capable of doing anything the G2x can do. Actually, it has 50% more RAM than the G2x. So you don't have to worry about running out unlike the G2x. Also, the MT4G's GPS is 100x better than the G2x's ****ty GPS.
I actually have used both phones so I actually know what I'm talking about.

yeah I got a great deal on craigslist, I am doing a trade so I don't even have to pay anything, and the mt4g is in perfect condition with screen protector etc, whereas my g2x is a little dinged up, also the mt4g is gonna be stable and I don't have to worry about random reboots, plus they have some pretty awesome custom sense roms for it.
oh yeah and the cpu on the mt4g can be overclocked up to 1.9 ghz lol

shazam1203 said:
yeah I got a great deal on craigslist, I am doing a trade so I don't even have to pay anything, and the mt4g is in perfect condition with screen protector etc, whereas my g2x is a little dinged up, also the mt4g is gonna be stable and I don't have to worry about random reboots, plus they have some pretty awesome custom sense roms for it.
oh yeah and the cpu on the mt4g can be overclocked up to 1.9 ghz lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good for you man,the glacier is a solid phone with huge support at xda. I too came from a mt4g and miss many features it has, anyways ya can't go wrong with that phone,enjoy it.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

It also come with timebomb from bad emmc.. happened to me
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI

Hey goodluck!
I think if I hadn't seen anything about the G2x and waited a little I would have went to the 4g, or the 4g Slide.
I came from a 3G Slide.

I bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 off Craigslist and I'm hesitant to move into it.
The phone is so huge, and I mean HUGE for me personal taste. I bought a case or and screen protector. I'm not really sure I'm going to keep the phone. Might just sell it back if I can't adjust.
I've complained about the G2X, but its funny, cause now that I have the "Best" android phone, I can't see myself leaving the G2X. Its just too big. Doesn't feel right to me
Still rocking my G2X but if I can't adjust, might just sell the Samsung Gs2 and wait for something else.

nycelitemaster said:
It also come with timebomb from bad emmc.. happened to me
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only some of the Glaciers have the "bad" emmc chip.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium

Yeah I've had good and bad eMMC's and it never died on me. Weird issue it is.

Disregard 10 char

I have both. MT4G built quality sucks. And I dont have any reboots on G2X

shazam1203 said:
Hey everyone just wanted to say thanks for the great support and the awesome custom roms, I know that none of you know me, just wanted to say thanks!
Moving on to Mytouch 4g tomorrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL have fun with your complete downgrade.
---------- Post added at 05:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:20 PM ----------
shazam1203 said:
yeah I got a great deal on craigslist, I am doing a trade so I don't even have to pay anything, and the mt4g is in perfect condition with screen protector etc, whereas my g2x is a little dinged up, also the mt4g is gonna be stable and I don't have to worry about random reboots, plus they have some pretty awesome custom sense roms for it.
oh yeah and the cpu on the mt4g can be overclocked up to 1.9 ghz lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You realize a dual core 1GHz phone will beat a single core 1.9 GHz right? (not to mention you'll have horrible battery life at that clock speed seeing as your battery was made for single core at 1GHz. And not every phone can handle the same overclock, you could get a MT4G that can't even handle past 1GHz without freezing and reboots.)
Two cores at 1GHz = 2GHz power
One core at 1.9 = 1.9 GHz power.
Plus if you get a custom rom on here you don't get reboots, at least if you get off the bad 2.3.3 ROMs, the only 2.3.3 ROM I would ever use is Bionix reloaded.
I'm 100% stable.
---------- Post added at 05:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:22 PM ----------
mackster248 said:
That's a very naive thing to say. Yes, the MT4G has a single core. But it's capable of doing anything the G2x can do. Actually, it has 50% more RAM than the G2x. So you don't have to worry about running out unlike the G2x. Also, the MT4G's GPS is 100x better than the G2x's ****ty GPS.
I actually have used both phones so I actually know what I'm talking about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ****ty GPS? On every ROM I use now I get a lock in under 10 seconds, maybe you aren't giving the G2x the credit it deserves. If you had an optimized ROM/Kernel combo you wouldn't need more than 512mb RAM on this phone, and 256mb more RAM is NOT a substitute for a second core.
Ever tried running a Tegra 2 game on a MT4G? Or any CPU intensive game at all?
---------- Post added at 05:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:29 PM ----------
mackster248 said:
That's a very naive thing to say. Yes, the MT4G has a single core. But it's capable of doing anything the G2x can do. Actually, it has 50% more RAM than the G2x. So you don't have to worry about running out unlike the G2x. Also, the MT4G's GPS is 100x better than the G2x's ****ty GPS.
I actually have used both phones so I actually know what I'm talking about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ****ty GPS? On every ROM I use now I get a lock in under 10 seconds, maybe you aren't giving the G2x the credit it deserves. If you had an optimized ROM/Kernel combo you wouldn't need more than 512mb RAM on this phone, and 256mb more RAM is NOT a substitute for a second core.
Ever tried running a Tegra 2 game on a MT4G? Or any CPU intensive game at all?

IRASadPanda said:
LOL have fun with your complete downgrade.
---------- Post added at 05:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:20 PM ----------
You realize a dual core 1GHz phone will beat a single core 1.9 GHz right? (not to mention you'll have horrible battery life at that clock speed seeing as your battery was made for single core at 1GHz. And not every phone can handle the same overclock, you could get a MT4G that can't even handle past 1GHz without freezing and reboots.)
Two cores at 1GHz = 2GHz power
One core at 1.9 = 1.9 GHz power.
Plus if you get a custom rom on here you don't get reboots, at least if you get off the bad 2.3.3 ROMs, the only 2.3.3 ROM I would ever use is Bionix reloaded.
I'm 100% stable.
---------- Post added at 05:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:22 PM ----------
What ****ty GPS? On every ROM I use now I get a lock in under 10 seconds, maybe you aren't giving the G2x the credit it deserves. If you had an optimized ROM/Kernel combo you wouldn't need more than 512mb RAM on this phone, and 256mb more RAM is NOT a substitute for a second core.
Ever tried running a Tegra 2 game on a MT4G? Or any CPU intensive game at all?
---------- Post added at 05:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:29 PM ----------
What ****ty GPS? On every ROM I use now I get a lock in under 10 seconds, maybe you aren't giving the G2x the credit it deserves. If you had an optimized ROM/Kernel combo you wouldn't need more than 512mb RAM on this phone, and 256mb more RAM is NOT a substitute for a second core.
Ever tried running a Tegra 2 game on a MT4G? Or any CPU intensive game at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like someone didnt get their PSP for x-mas.... Lol ....its a phone and the mt4g beats the crap out of my GFs Mororola with dual core Tegra2.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium

I just come from mt4g and its a great phone. But I had to upgrade to g2x because ics development is pretty much at a stand still for that device and without ics there's no future for that phone. Everything hott has already been done on that phone. You're really taking a step backwards
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA

romuloxiii said:
Sounds like someone didnt get their PSP for x-mas.... Lol ....its a phone and the mt4g beats the crap out of my GFs Mororola with dual core Tegra2.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I've had a PSP for a few years now, and of course YOU would think your phone is better than hers, get a second opinion from anyone and they will tell you that your phone is nothing compared to any dual core phone.

Well I had to wait one more day to pick up the mt4g, so still thinking it through, of course right when I am about to trade it I dont get reboots since I flashed stock, I did post an ad on craigslist to see if anyone wanted to trade their mt4g slide since that would be a better trade. I get reboots on all the custom roms, although gotta say the best rom I have used is Eaglesblood, hardly any reboots and decent gps

Try new hfs 1.3. No hiccups for me. Best from I've ever used
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA

ps. there isn't much going on in development department with mt4g. at least g2x is moving slowly to ics

Alright to all you haters... someone offered me the Mytouch 4g slide, so im gonna take that and hopefully pick it up tonight. so happy lol

nexus 5 bad scores?

so i was watching youtube and this guy did a few tests, antutu quadrant etc.the nexus 5 didnt even score as high as s4 on any of them.
is this because of 4.4? dunno just seems really odd a phone equipped the way it is wouldnt make good scores. ik they are mostly superficial but it kinda does matter to me.

clorbag said:
so i was watching youtube and this guy did a few tests, antutu quadrant etc.the nexus 5 didnt even score as high as s4 on any of them.
is this because of 4.4? dunno just seems really odd a phone equipped the way it is wouldnt make good scores. ik they are mostly superficial but it kinda does matter to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung are one of the known companies to optimize their CPU for benchmarks. Ever since this discovery I have come to believe there completely useless!
I am pretty sure Apple do the same but not sure.
So don't bother with them no more is my advice. you will see in real world usage how much faster it is. it's a beast.

It's the same reason why you don't solely judge a football team by total yards. There's much more to the story.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

yeah i thought they were odd. i had phones that were powerful that didnt score well. and phones with less power scoring insane. its really for bragging rights among friends. but its something i seem to use every time i get a new phone. that also explains why some stock roms making better scores then some of the better custom ones.

God u ppl it's android 4.4 that's why apps need to be updated for android 4.4.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk

I don't know why this still has to be said every time a new phone is released, but here we go... Benchmark scores mean absolutely NOTHING in real world usability/performance. Stop worrying about it and enjoy your phone (whenever you get it).

technostein said:
Samsung are one of the known companies to optimize their CPU for benchmarks. Ever since this discovery I have come to believe there completely useless!
I am pretty sure Apple do the same but not sure.
So don't bother with them no more is my advice. you will see in real world usage how much faster it is. it's a beast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the same investigators who have brought the benchmark goosing issues to light have already said the neither Motorola nor Apple does this. So some companies benchmarked still hold true.

even if they mean nothing i was curious why the nexus scored lower to comparable phones. so chill man.

technostein said:
Samsung are one of the known companies to optimize their CPU for benchmarks. Ever since this discovery I have come to believe there completely useless!
I am pretty sure Apple do the same but not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Anandtech the performance gain of the "optimizations" is about 5%. So, not much.
And about Apple, what they do is optimize their software for specific benchmarks. Even worse IMO.

He's correct. Even if benchmarks don't matter it still shouldn't score this low. There is something wrong. Like someone said before the benchmark apps probably need to be updated to 4.4. But it is something to keep an eye on. We should keep an eye on real world performance, if that lags than we have the benchmarks as a reference.
Sent from my SGH-I747

Reminds me of The Kardashians...lots of fake drama, ultimately meaning nothing.

WHO CARES! Yes, I agree that it shouldn't be benchmarking so low with the same processor as the note 3 and g2, but in real world use, this thing probably flies like the Nexus 4.
I haven't actually used the device, so I actually have no clue if it's fast or not, but according to all the reviews and hands on's, it's fast.
---------- Post added at 08:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:18 PM ----------
wideasleep1 said:
Reminds me of The Kardashians...lots of fake drama, ultimately meaning nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol

stelv said:
He's correct. Even if benchmarks don't matter it still shouldn't score this low. There is something wrong. Like someone said before the benchmark apps probably need to be updated to 4.4. But it is something to keep an eye on. We should keep an eye on real world performance, if that lags than we have the benchmarks as a reference.
Sent from my SGH-I747
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point still stands. It all still means nothing. If the benchmark apps update for 4.4 (assuming that this is even the issue) and the scores stay low, then what? Are you going to return your phone? Are you going to demand an explanation from Google/LG? I mean, seriously what does it matter what these arbitrary scores are if your phone performs exactly as you'd expect it to?
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an ass but it just seems silly to waste time caring about this.

sn0warmy said:
My point still stands. It all still means nothing. If the benchmark apps update for 4.4 (assuming that this is even the issue) and the scores stay low, then what? Are you going to return your phone? Are you going to demand an explanation from Google/LG? I mean, seriously what does it matter what these arbitrary scores are if your phone performs exactly as you'd expect it to?
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an ass but it just seems silly to waste time caring about this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely agree. :good:

Benchmarks are so misunderstood.
Benchmarks won't tell ya how smooth a device will be, at least with hardware within a year or 2 of each other. And that's simply cuz modern hardware will run most any semi well coded os smoothly.
Benchmarks will give ya a real good idea how long a device will take to zip or unzip files, or recode or edit that hd video you just took, or run that 3d intensive game, and many others things.
So ya see, benchmarks can be meaningless, and can be most informative. Depends on what your talking about, and the trolls never say what they are taking about. Merrily we troll along ......... troll along ......... troll along .......

sn0warmy said:
My point still stands. It all still means nothing. If the benchmark apps update for 4.4 (assuming that this is even the issue) and the scores stay low, then what? Are you going to return your phone? Are you going to demand an explanation from Google/LG? I mean, seriously what does it matter what these arbitrary scores are if your phone performs exactly as you'd expect it to?
I'm sorry if I'm coming off as an ass but it just seems silly to waste time caring about this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't matter to me. Real world performance is all I need. They shouldn't be low though if the g2 is getting 1,000s of points higher. I am sure everything will be fine though when I get mine and test it out.
Sent from my SGH-I747

stelv said:
He's correct. Even if benchmarks don't matter it still shouldn't score this low. There is something wrong. Like someone said before the benchmark apps probably need to be updated to 4.4. But it is something to keep an eye on. We should keep an eye on real world performance, if that lags than we have the benchmarks as a reference.
Sent from my SGH-I747
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it was the Same with the Nexus 4. the Xperia Z blew it away even with same specs. Which is more evidence that benchmarks are useless.
One thing I can't help but wonder is how much would a iPhone score with a snapdragon 800

some of you are taking this out of context and making it more then it needs to be. all i want to know is why its not scoring as high as expected or to comparable devices. i don't care if benchmark tests mean anything or not.

clorbag said:
some of you are taking this out of context and making it more then it needs to be. all i want to know is why its not scoring as high as expected or to comparable devices. i don't care if benchmark tests mean anything or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so far we can only guess that it might not be optimized for 4.4

Most synthetic benchmarks are useless and misleading. The only ones I pay attention to are ones based on real game engines like Epic Citadel and Anomaly 2. Can anyone share benchmark results for these two at highest settings?

GPU on N5

Guys... I know that nexus 5 supports es3 but I want to know why not es3.1... Also are these standards based on hardware or software tweaks... Is it actually important?!?
Also how future proof is the n5?!? Will the gpu be capable of running high end graphic games for a long time?!?
I read on uber linaro kernel page or something that n5 gpu using that kernel can be over clocked to 650mhz... So is it really necessary or would it at 450mhz perform well for like 2years?!?
I don't want "its up to you" and stuff...
Sent from my Nexus 5

Over clocking the GPU doesn't seem to increase performance on the n5.
I don't personally believe any android device is gaming future proof. Its all moving too fast.
I'd buy a tablet for games if I knew it wouldn't be pretty much obsolete in a year or two.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Sukrith said:
Also how future proof is the n5?!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hardware is as future-proof as any other top end device. No more or less. The advantage of the Nexus line is on the software support side.
I don't push my GPU enough that overclocking is really important to me.

rootSU said:
Over clocking the GPU doesn't seem to increase performance on the n5.
I don't personally believe any android device is gaming future proof. Its all moving too fast.
I'd buy a tablet for games if I knew it wouldn't be pretty much obsolete in a year or two.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wakamatsu said:
The hardware is as future-proof as any other top end device. No more or less. The advantage of the Nexus line is on the software support side.
I don't push my GPU enough that overclocking is really important to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the gl standards?!? Any clue on if it is hardware or software?!? Also how much did you all get on Manhattan and antutu es3?!?
Sent from my Nexus 5

Sukrith said:
What about the gl standards?!? Any clue on if it is hardware or software?!? Also how much did you all get on Manhattan and antutu es3?!?
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is both hardware and software. There's a benchmark thread around here somewhere but generally people only care about real world performance.

Yeah, from what I understand, OpenGL standards depend both on chipset capabilities/instructions and correspondent software implementations.

Did a benchmark but I dislike the results..

Did a benchmark but the g4 out beats this phone and the note 5 what ya think or feel about this??

xavier55 said:
Did a benchmark but the g4 out beats this phone and the note 5 what ya think or feel about this??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stange....I obtained 66610 Antutu 6.0.1 score on mu LG V10 H961N and 65222 on my wife's LG G4 H815

xavier55 said:
Did a benchmark but the g4 out beats this phone and the note 5 what ya think or feel about this??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at your notificationbar you have tons out stuff currently running and one looks like an antivirus app.
Restart your phone and close the antivirus and the apps which show the notifications.
There's a reason why in benchmarks only the necessary stuff runs.
(in pc benchmarks they often use a separate ssd with a minimal Windows installation on it to get higher scores)
P.s.: the g4 should have an nearly eqaul score than the v10 and the note 5 of course has the higher score it has one of the fastest processors atm even faster than the snapdragon 810.

I have both phones, they are not that different. The G4 is rooted and debloated while the V10 is somewhat debloated.
I am sure that not running the 3D test is making your overall score lower as well.

Then sell it and buy other phones lmao

I did this test twice.
The first time my score was about 62000
The second time my score was about 54000
So i remove antutu apps from my phone. Its not a stable app and the results are fun. In Every test you will surprise with a strange score...
Remove it and enjoy ... Best phone of world is in your hands.
Sent from my LG-H960 using Tapatalk

hesamjm said:
I did this test twice.
The first time my score was about 62000
The second time my score was about 54000
So i remove antutu apps from my phone. Its not a stable app and the results are fun. In Every test you will surprise with a strange score...
Remove it and enjoy ... Best phone of world is in your hands.
Sent from my LG-H960 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are many things that changed the score, the app is not unstable, and the score doesnt say much.

trungvov10 said:
There are many things that changed the score, the app is not unstable, and the score doesnt say much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did test whitout any time twice. Its very fun ... Do you know its about 8000 score differnce...
How is it possible
Just joke
Sent from my LG-H960 using Tapatalk

hesamjm said:
I did test whitout any time twice. Its very fun ... Do you know its about 8000 score differnce...
How is it possible
Just joke
Sent from my LG-H960 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not everybody get that 8k score difference, in fact, I tested 5 times and they r all around 63k to 65k

Real world results matter, not benchmarks

OP, you don't even have the 3d benchmark installed, meaning your results are going to be lackluster in comparison with one that does. Personally the highest I've managed to get was 70k, but that seemed to be a one time thing. I average around mid to high 60k.

If you want to run a benchmark it's best to do it on a phone that has been rooted with no extra apps or bloat installed.

Well, a friend of mine has the Note 5, which, although sometimes reaching 85k, still gets about 65k most of the time.
So stop drooling, guys! XD

thisisjason said:
Real world results matter, not benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To me - this is the best statement towards this discussion. Benchmarks can be skewed and ultimately do not mean much. Every user is different, and each phone responds differently based on use. As a owner of Note's and Iphone 6 Plus - I have to say - the V10 is an impressive phone. If LG continues down this path, they will become a major competitor.

In all honesty benchmark apps are completely pointless. The results mean absolutely nothing. The phone runs great so who cares about a number

Stock rom 5.0 rooted, superuser installed

Funny that you all are scoring so highly. I ran AnTuTu 2x while fresh out of the box. Both scores were in the 46-48K range.
I scratched my head because my [rooted & ROM'ed] G3 and S3 had much higher scores but can't match how fast and smooth my [stock & full of bloat] V10 is.
Benchmark scores are indeed for those whom are lacking in other areas LOL. But seriously, don't put much weight into benchmarking your device.
Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk

Benchmarks are for phone nerds

Benchmark scores in a "real life review" section... I can remember Galaxy s3 moments, when roms and kernel had benchmark hacks to give high scores.

Mine were worse, and this was only after less than 24 hours of use, so the memory is not full, and the device isn't packed with apps that run in the background. I made sure to close all apps in the background and disabled everything that might've made the phone slower. The end result was something that Note 3 could beat easily. I think it's software-related, but I also think they will never fix it. G5 is out, and since they're going head to head with Samsung right now (and they will lose), it's their main priority. We'll be lucky if we ever get Marshmallow.