Related
I think most of the people i know, love the iphone4 design, My qs is, could we keep the hardware and run windows phone7.5 on this device.
If it doesnt excist, what do we need to this, im really looking in to make windows phone7.5 for the iphone!
thx
It's not possible as of yet, who knows in the future
Honestly, your best bet would be to try and fit the guts of a Windows Phone into an iPhone (which will still have problems). The alternative is to rewrite the Windows Phone OS to work with iPhone hardware (which is a ridiculous task). Either way, I don't see this happening.
There are more handsets with Windows Phone on them than there are iPhone models, and there are more being made regularly. Just pick a phone that already exists or wait till something new comes out that you like.
Not sure if it is possible, but I think it would be hilarious. You probably wouldn't make any friends amongst the hardcore apple users.
There are a couple nokia windows phone's that have nice cameras and screens. There is a nokia phone coming out with a 41mp camera. The Lumia 900 is also nice.
bionicpassero said:
There are a couple nokia windows phone's that have nice cameras and screens. There is a nokia phone coming out with a 41mp camera. The Lumia 900 is also nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
41mp Can you tell me what phone? Thats just
Nokia announces 808 PureView: Symbian Belle, 4-inch display, 41-megapixel camera! (hands-on video)
Sorry the OS is not windows but symbian.
bionicpassero said:
Nokia announces 808 PureView: Symbian Belle, 4-inch display, 41-megapixel camera! (hands-on video)
Sorry the OS is not windows but symbian.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
41mp, why would someone need that on a phone.. lol
Ya it does sound like a lot. Engadget has a hands on with the phone. It sounds very interesting for photography. The only way you could actually replace cameras with a phone is if you were willing to have a lens that really sticks out of the back of the phone which I am sure most people wouldn't like. I guess that's obvious though.
yeah, but I guarantee the cmos sensor isn't 41mp, probably 10 at best, so the rest of the camera doesn't matter. As for op, simple solution... sell ur iPhone and get a windowz phone. Ur phone has GREAT resale value
U have to go to jail for that.
Becoz win7.5 is not open source.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
One of the many fans awaited device is Nokia 808 Nokia PureView generated using the Symbian (Nokia OS) and comes with 41-megapixel camera. Now, it is known in local selling prices for these devices is RM1899, and will be available starting tomorrow.
As a general aware, early this week, several Nokia Store has been available to provide test units at Nokia Store, and finally, having anticipated it will go on sale from tomorrow.
In terms of specifications, Nokia 808 AMOLED screen size PureView bring 4.0-inch, 16GB of storage space built with micro-SD slot supporting up to 32GB, 512MB RAM, 1.3GHz ARM-11 processor chips, 41-megapixel camera Carl Zeiss, VGA front camera, FM radio built, and also generated using Nokia Belle.
For those of you who like it, can get started tomorrow, but for those who want to try first, may be heading to the Nokia Store across the country, and experience the 41-megapixel camera that comes with it
Why did you post here? 808 isn't a WP7, and it's not a Nokia-lovers forum...
emoskremo said:
One of the many fans awaited device is Nokia 808 Nokia PureView generated using the Symbian (Nokia OS) and comes with 41-megapixel camera. Now, it is known in local selling prices for these devices is RM1899, and will be available starting tomorrow.
As a general aware, early this week, several Nokia Store has been available to provide test units at Nokia Store, and finally, having anticipated it will go on sale from tomorrow.
In terms of specifications, Nokia 808 AMOLED screen size PureView bring 4.0-inch, 16GB of storage space built with micro-SD slot supporting up to 32GB, 512MB RAM, 1.3GHz ARM-11 processor chips, 41-megapixel camera Carl Zeiss, VGA front camera, FM radio built, and also generated using Nokia Belle.
For those of you who like it, can get started tomorrow, but for those who want to try first, may be heading to the Nokia Store across the country, and experience the 41-megapixel camera that comes with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, that's the one with awesome sauce on it. When you get a chance to use it, post a review !
no comment. =|
Whats the point of this topic..is it telling us that Nokia came out with a camera instead of a phone..or the opposite?
I mean seriously!! Okay, i agree that this device has a 41mp camera..but what for?? Its already left behind man..nokia should just learn to accept that. lol
I used to be a loyal nokia user..but it kinda sucks when they just abandoned Symbian just like that instead of developing it further...and joined with windows and linux to compete with android and apple..how low can they go?? hahaha...
And it is not real 41 megapixeplsssssss camera.
Of course, packing a larger sensor with more than three times the number of pixels doesn't translate into better photos: smaller pixels collect less light, which worsens image quality. The thing is, Nokia doesn't really want you to use the full resolution of its sensor. Not for giant photos, anyway.
Instead, the 808 defaults to a 5-megapixel resolution. Through a process called pixel oversampling (though some might call it pixel binning), Nokia combines seven pixels into one superpixel. Doing that helps eliminate image noise in low-light conditions and, according to Nokia, makes noise virtually nonexistent when shooting in good lighting. So while the 808 can be set to take 38- or 34-megapixel images depending on the aspect ratio used--4:3 or 16:9, respectively--it's not why Nokia used such a high-resolution sensor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is digitaly generated image that equals to 41 MP cam. So in general they didn't do anything "awsome".........inovative yes
I hope apple would not sue them for this hahahahaha
^
ohhhh apple........
If only there was a "like" button..I would have clicked it.. lol
1899rm damn that's expensive...and the only good thing about this phone is the camera...everything else is completely outdated....1.3ghz, belle os, low ppi screen only 512 ram. only dedicated photography buffs need apply
chaki- said:
And it is not real 41 megapixeplsssssss camera.
It is digitaly generated image that equals to 41 MP cam. So in general they didn't do anything "awsome".........inovative yes
I hope apple would not sue them for this hahahahaha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've misunderstood the information. Check http://www.nokia.com/global/products/pureview/ to see how but basically the only digital manipulation is actually in converting the 41 mp data down to the default 5 mp image. This is what is being referred to in the bit you quote, it is referring to how the high res data from the sensor is reduced in order to take lower res photographs.
Having seen the full res pictures it takes I can assure you the camera is definitely awesome and blows away a lot of proper dslr's.
It does actually have a 41 megapixel sensor, as you can read in nokias explanatory pdf availabe from their website.
It uses a 41 mp sensor but defaults to 5 mp pictures due to image size.
You say it is a digitally generated image, all non film camera images are, however in this case the image is not as may be implied generated via extrapolation of a lower res ccd but actually is down sampled from a very high res one.
This is also why the digital zoom is limited to just 2x because its unzoomed image is already so high it can use digital editing to crop the full image to produce a zoom which is still super high resolution.
Dave
( http://www.google.com/producer/editions/CAownKXmAQ/bigfatuniverse )
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk 2
41 Mpixel - absolutely awesome..
41 MP and what ? i think nothin' maybe you can text message and call your friends and that's all. I've got nokia mobile phone and i'm feelin' like punishin'.
You must be fkin stupid to buy these phone.
trellva25 said:
1899rm damn that's expensive...and the only good thing about this phone is the camera...everything else is completely outdated....1.3ghz, belle os, low ppi screen only 512 ram. only dedicated photography buffs need apply
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's one of the best cameras in the market and you can update your Facebook status or call mom. What's outdated about that.
Hey there!
I've been thinking about getting a new phone during my time at telemarketing (can get them with a decent deal), but can't really decide which one should I choose. At the moment I have HTC Desire HD and I've had it for little over a year now.
I'm down to 3 different phones: Samsung Galaxy S3, HTC One X or Nokia Lumia 900. I can get GS3 and Lumia through the telemarketing, but for One X I would have to get it from somewhere else.
GS3 and One X would be awesome choices as they are pretty new models in the market (although, Lumia 900 isn't that old either) and I'm already familiar with the Android OS. I also like that they have a Quad-core processors and the screens are amazing too. But Lumia would be an interesting choice too as I like how fluid the whole OS works. It also has couple other standard features I really like, such as the Nokia Radio-mix or whatever it is called. The build of Lumia feels really sturdy, too.
And what I look from a phone is pretty much that it would look nice, work smoothly and could be customized to at least some extent, even the small customization of Lumia with the 7.8 update is enough for me. Oh and, music is one of the more important factors for me too (GS3 still being the best choice for this with the FLAC support).
So, if you have any suggestions, please tell me! But I must say that I have time until Saturday 30th 15:59CET, because that's my last day in the job.
And please share your own experiences and thoughts of the phones too!
Whatever you do DO NOT get the Lumia 900, they will fall in value very soon as it will not get Windows 8 making them redundant with 7.8. Get it if you plan to stick with the Version 7 of windows OS but future wise it'll be a dead beat.
I've had both the HOX and SGS3 and both are fantastic phones.
If you need expandable storage and a removable battery then get the SGS3 if you don't the HOX is a great alternative. It's screen is lovely, camera is better in my eyes, it looks better, and HTC is good with software updates.
The SGS3 has the better audio via headphones if that is of any significance, records better videos but sound not all that, the screen displays deeper blacks compared to the HOX and better contrasts but images appear over saturated compared to the more natural looking images on the SLCD2 on the HOX.
You'll be happy with either.
hi friends. the topic says it all. but here is the catch.
i have to go on a trip. its my first time ever out of the country so i really need a great CAMERA PHONE.
i know 808 sweeps floor with Both S4 and S3 for its camera performance but i still need an idea from u guys, cause u guys are the best
i have owned S3 and its camera is great. but not a good low light performer. its THE GREATEST PHONE for sure. and S4 will not be available till end of this month.i really need to decide within like 2 days to go for any set.
are there any friends here who owned 808 and S3 together? cause i have never used 808 but every read only good about its camera.
pls suggest me. i will not go for 920 cause windows phone sucks! well, Symbian sucks ever worse but its camera is comparable to DSLRs so im asking just to confirm from u guys.
i expect good and sincere help cause i love xda
*EDIT* and one more question what can be the price of used 808 as i have no idea at all about its resale
thanks in advance for ur time and help
aami.aami said:
i have to go on a trip. its my first time ever out of the country so i really need a great CAMERA PHONE.
i know 808 sweeps floor with Both S4 and S3 for its camera performance but i still need an idea from u guys, cause u guys are the best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't you answered your own question???
Questions should go to the proper forum section, but we have camera discussions here too.
With that said, not to leave you without an answer, the PureView 808 is obviously the best camera phone on the market. The good news about the GS4 is however that it does awesome good light photos which at 13MPs are good for digital zooming or later cutting which is usually a problem with phones (no optical zoom). The bad news is that, despite improving tremendously, absolute dark shots are still problematic, and if half your shots are taken during nights or very limited lights, the Lumia 920 is the one to choose. If 80% of your shots are taken in low but not dark conditions, average lights and ideal scenery, the GS4 is an excellent all-around performer for a phone.
But you can judge the quality for yourself over this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2213853
price of a used around 320-350$ for now
aami.aami said:
pls suggest me. i will not go for 920 cause windows phone sucks! well, Symbian sucks ever worse but its camera is comparable to DSLRs so im asking just to confirm from u guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, its not comparable to a DSLR, but its much better then the S3/S4 and all the other phones. If you want a good low light phone, go for the 808/920 or htc one.
But if you want to shoot REALLY NICE pictures, you should get a dslr.
For example the Sony Alpha 57: currently avaible for 440€ in Germany. The supplied objective is ok but you can improve the quality with an alternative one.
All the phones avaible ARE NOT WORTH COMPARING WITH A GOOD DSLR!
None. If you are going on a trip, you should get a DSLR.
Symbian sucks ever worse but its camera is comparable to DSLRs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sure you have never handled a DSLR. Don't spread FUD here.
hot_spare said:
None. If you are going on a trip, you should get a DSLR.
I am sure you have never handled a DSLR. Don't spread FUD here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks to all of u guys for such quick and great responses!!
and dude i said "COMPARABLE" quality to DSLR
here, see for urself:
http://www.gsmarena.com/pureview_blind_test-review-773p2.php
and BTW, Olympus E-PL2 is a mid range DSLR! and 808 beat that!
and here,
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_808_pureview_low_light-review-775.php
it is said that, "The Nokia 808 PureView is on its march to becoming iconic, trashing the Olympus PEN E-PL2 Micro Four Thirds camera in our blind test and then matching the Canon 5D Mark III for resolution in the process."
so yeah... it does have Great sensor with great performance...
and i have chosen to go for it
aami.aami said:
thanks to all of u guys for such quick and great responses!!
and dude i said "COMPARABLE" quality to DSLR
here, see for urself:
http://www.gsmarena.com/pureview_blind_test-review-773p2.php
and BTW, Olympus E-PL2 is a mid range DSLR! and 808 beat that!
and here,
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_808_pureview_low_light-review-775.php
it is said that, "The Nokia 808 PureView is on its march to becoming iconic, trashing the Olympus PEN E-PL2 Micro Four Thirds camera in our blind test and then matching the Canon 5D Mark III for resolution in the process."
so yeah... it does have Great sensor with great performance...
and i have chosen to go for it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Technically, Olympus E-PL2 is not a DSLR. It's a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera.
And "Micro Four Thirds" should have told you the size of the sensor. Compare this to a size of a typical APS-C sensor.
If I am looking to take photos, I would rather get a typical DSLR.
Matching 5D Mark III in photography? I would better ask the editor to get his eyes checked. 808 is neither good phone, not a good camera. It's much better than typical mobile camera, but can't be compared to a good DSLR. It even worse than a point n shoot like RX100.
I don't need photography lessons from blind test in GSMArena.
808 is comparable to my 5D mark III? Please. I'll advise you to stick with your current phone and get something like Canon 650D or 60D.
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using xda premium
aami.aami said:
pls suggest me. i will not go for 920 cause windows phone sucks! well, Symbian sucks ever worse but its camera is comparable to DSLRs so im asking just to confirm from u guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you just want the best camera but not the window phone based phone, why not try HTC One which owns the ultrapixal camera.But note that the best camera on smartphone is still the pureview camera on Nokia Lumia 920. And the windows phone system don't sucks like what you imagined.
Dannyada1988 said:
why not try HTC One which owns the ultrapixal camera..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If 2 micron is ultrapilxel, what do you call a 5 micron? Elephant-pixel or dragon-pixel?
I wonder if you know that even a 6 year old phone like Nokia N95 had a bigger sensor and bigger pixel-size. In 2007 they had a phone with 1/2.5 inch sensor and 2.2 micron pixel pitch.
Don't remember anyone calling it ultrapixel!
hot_spare said:
If 2 micron is ultrapilxel, what do you call a 5 micron? Elephant-pixel or dragon-pixel?
I wonder if you know that even a 6 year old phone like Nokia N95 had a bigger sensor and bigger pixel-size. In 2007 they had a phone with 1/2.5 inch sensor and 2.2 micron pixel pitch.
Don't remember anyone calling it ultrapixel!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ultrapixel is just a marketing term aka a name. is it so hard to understand that? HTC figured that it would be rather embarrasing to sell a flagship with only 4MP on board so they coined this term.
Its like apple coined the retina display term. theres nothing to do with retina there. its just a name.
And how big fat and heavy was that n95? 808 is best cameraphone out there but nokia coundnt sell it. people dont want fat phones anymore. not most people.
Seems like you don't want a dslr. If you want REALLY GOOD picture quality and that's all you care about you could still get a decent digital non-dlsr camera which is much smaller than a dslr. I mean you already got a decent phone anyways so why throw so much money on 808 that's got nothing but a camera? Better spend something like $350 on a decent camera with superb quality. That price range can already get you something much better than any smartphone camera's
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
joslicx said:
ultrapixel is just a marketing term aka a name. is it so hard to understand that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Captain Obvious strikes back with vengeance.
i know it very clear 808 just cant compete with DSLRs but u should give the credit where it is due. 808 does compete with some of the low end DSLRs and i said LOW END!!
and 920 is only better than 808 in terms of steady videos cause of its OIS and thats it!
808 captures true colors and u can get the punchier colors while chossing vivid mode or increasing the contrast
i just wish, GOD just WWWIIIISSSSHHH that HTC had used some high quality and higher pixel count sensor in ONE! that would have been awesome!
ultra pixel of HTC ONE is like the 12MP sensor of N8 when it was introduced years ago! and then Nokia perfected that with 808. i was literally hoping a great phone from HTC this year at least, but alas... Ultrapixel should be evolved and it definitely would be, into something comparable to what Nokia did with 808!
now my current wish is Nokia choses to go Android and introduce Pureview Phase 3 phone with FHD screen and camera with double the performance of 808... (just a wish )
this thread to show the openion of all android users about them camera and its unique criteria of them vaviorite.any ploaded picture of your faviorite device is welcomed.no special test and no offend to any company its only your openion to the smart mobiles you used...
i will start with my faviorite .. i loved htc cameras from the start.as i had my 1st htc device (htc evo 3d) just becuase its wonderful cam.it was 5mp only but had a very conventional resolution.and its 3d picture was a real chaleng.
for now i find htc one is one of the best. as the new era of cam technology started by them....
write about what you think in your device cam.
Well I've never had anything by HTC phones but think that my one x probably takes the best photos out of the phones that I've had. Pictures always come out really crisp and sharp unless I'm in really low light. So my vote would be for the one x
DroidIt! said:
Well I've never had anything by HTC phones but think that my one x probably takes the best photos out of the phones that I've had. Pictures always come out really crisp and sharp unless I'm in really low light. So my vote would be for the one x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup I tried already many phones and in see that one x has still one of the best cams... Even s3/s4 aren't that good like all people are thinking... My opinion because of even some tests even my old HD2 and the DHD from my dad are making better pics then any Samsung phones until s3 and some LG phones so htc camera software is even in stock really good optimized )
Gesendet von meinem HTC One X mit Tapatalk 2
htc one have the best camera ever ! :laugh:
I don't think so
dddmp4 said:
htc one have the best camera ever ! :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sharp Aquos SH-02e has the best camera right now. I really wonder why it hasn't surpassed the crappy samsung chinese phones that everyone into consumerism seems to think is an awesome phone.
and btw, I have it.
HTC cam..still the best...look here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1652642
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
I'm not much of a photographer myself, but, bizarrely, the camera spec of a phone is an important factor.
Throughout my years of buying phones, I have seen that Sony has proved themselves, in my eyes, as the best manufacturer of smartphone cameras.
Why?
My first REAL camera phone was the SE K800i, for the time, it was fantastic. I didn't find a phone with a better camera for a while after that.
Then I bought the SE Satio, 12MP at a time when most phones seemed to have 5MP or lower, its flash was incredible and its night pictures were incredible, it even produced better images than my dad's Nokia N8, another 12MP phone released at a later date.
The Xperia arc S was a downgrade in MP to the Satio, but its images were of similar quality.
I then got the Xperia T, which had an awesome 13MP camera.
My Xperia Z has a great camera, but it has one fault; Sony's camera software compresses the image too much.
Overall, I'd say that, at the moment, the Xperia Z/Galaxy S4 have the best cameras (They both use the same sensor).
Probably followed by the HTC One, which can sometimes have worse pictures in light conditions (Though generally better in dark conditions).
For those interested in camera-phones, I'd suggest looking into the yet to be announced Xperia i1, which has a 20.7MP sensor, and an ISO much, much, much, higher than that of the HTC One, theoretically meaning better pictures in low-light conditions.
shadowhacker27 said:
Sharp Aquos SH-02e has the best camera right now. I really wonder why it hasn't surpassed the crappy samsung chinese phones that everyone into consumerism seems to think is an awesome phone.
and btw, I have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your openion is respected . but notice that really most the phones are china made even iphones.and htc itself despite the great manifacture it is china made. ould you upload a picture from your faviorite device to have an idea.
i just checked this device.really its a good one.still waiting for your samples
xL3thalTuRdZz said:
I'm not much of a photographer myself, but, bizarrely, the camera spec of a phone is an important factor.
Throughout my years of buying phones, I have seen that Sony has proved themselves, in my eyes, as the best manufacturer of smartphone cameras.
Why?
My first REAL camera phone was the SE K800i, for the time, it was fantastic. I didn't find a phone with a better camera for a while after that.
Then I bought the SE Satio, 12MP at a time when most phones seemed to have 5MP or lower, its flash was incredible and its night pictures were incredible, it even produced better images than my dad's Nokia N8, another 12MP phone released at a later date.
The Xperia arc S was a downgrade in MP to the Satio, but its images were of similar quality.
I then got the Xperia T, which had an awesome 13MP camera.
My Xperia Z has a great camera, but it has one fault; Sony's camera software compresses the image too much.
Overall, I'd say that, at the moment, the Xperia Z/Galaxy S4 have the best cameras (They both use the same sensor).
Probably followed by the HTC One, which can sometimes have worse pictures in light conditions (Though generally better in dark conditions).
For those interested in camera-phones, I'd suggest looking into the yet to be announced Xperia i1, which has a 20.7MP sensor, and an ISO much, much, much, higher than that of the HTC One, theoretically meaning better pictures in low-light conditions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
at 1st i thought at 1st that u dont intrested in cameras but u r in fact expert.i know you r sony minded and like the sony devices and your welknow rom that i use for my xperia tx.sony is a pioner in digital cameras no doubt.my TX is realy astonishing in the day light but not that good in dark light. we all waiting for xperia i .and i hope u make your rom for that device as it is very fast and smooth.
what you think about nokia cameras?
Alex-V said:
HTC cam..still the best...look here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1652642
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thnx for your comment.alex.. do you think the roms that we use can impruve the cam function more than the stock software? and can you giv us an example....
DroidIt! said:
Well I've never had anything by HTC phones but think that my one x probably takes the best photos out of the phones that I've had. Pictures always come out really crisp and sharp unless I'm in really low light. So my vote would be for the one x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
droidit.... do you think the viper rom added more abilities to your device(htc onex) abilities???
Hey guys,
the oneX cam is pretty nice and there is a cool thread from @Shan89 about a glitch which is improving pictures @ night.
When you´re flashing viperX you can choose a camera mod which i think gives more menu options and the ability to save uncompressed jpgs...
correct me if i´m wrong...
the glitch is still working with this mod.
i also like camera fv5 because it supports custom exposure time or whatever its called in english...
you can create bizarre photos in the dark or do some light paintings...
cant speak for other devices... before the hox i used a HTC Prophet
cheers
cant speak for other devices... before the hox i used a HTC Prophet
cheers[/QUOTE]
sure you are right and no mistakes.thnxx alot for telling me about shan89 thread i missed it. i hope if you try htc one cam.i think you will be intrested..
thanks all I think HTC cameras the best if we compare them with other cams in the same specification
I have never personally tried a Nokia phone but wondered how the Lumia with it's 42 mp camera stacked up against other phones. Don't know if that really makes a difference or not but would be really interested to find out. Hey bldy, yeah I think with all the extra options we get to tweak in the software has made a pretty big difference. I find that I can control a lot more of the variables when it comes to taking pictures. I still do have a standalone Sony cybershot for taking pictures if I know I'm going to be taking a lot of photos,but Ithink our cameras produce pictures about on par with that.
from my Viped out one x
bldysurgeon said:
at 1st i thought at 1st that u dont intrested in cameras but u r in fact expert.i know you r sony minded and like the sony devices and your welknow rom that i use for my xperia tx.sony is a pioner in digital cameras no doubt.my TX is realy astonishing in the day light but not that good in dark light. we all waiting for xperia i .and i hope u make your rom for that device as it is very fast and smooth.
what you think about nokia cameras?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That reminds me, I need to update that ROM, but can't get the updater-script right.
My dad has had a few Nokia phones, his N8, for example had an 12MP camera which wasn't as good as my Satio (worse pictures in dark light, slight yellow tint in pictures), but compared to other phones, it was still great.
He now has a Nokia Lumia 820 and he hates it. It has an 8MP camera, dual LED flash, but it is simply horrid. Photos are too dark and saturated, and photos with a backlight are terrible. It is one of the worst camera phones I've used.
Nokia only seems to put great cameras onto it's flagship, because from what I have heard, the 920 has a great camera.
An annoying thing with Windows phones is the lack of options for the picture. You can't tweak individual settings for your pictures.
Sent from my 3rd (Yes, that's right: 3rd) Xperia Z
xL3thalTuRdZz said:
That reminds me, I need to update that ROM, but can't get the updater-script right.
My dad has had a few Nokia phones, his N8, for example had an 12MP camera which wasn't as good as my Satio (worse pictures in dark light, slight yellow tint in pictures), but compared to other phones, it was still great.
He now has a Nokia Lumia 820 and he hates it. It has an 8MP camera, dual LED flash, but it is simply horrid. Photos are too dark and saturated, and photos with a backlight are terrible. It is one of the worst camera phones I've used.
Nokia only seems to put great cameras onto it's flagship, because from what I have heard, the 920 has a great camera.
An annoying thing with Windows phones is the lack of options for the picture. You can't tweak individual settings for your pictures.
Sent from my 3rd (Yes, that's right: 3rd) Xperia Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i told you .... you are really expert. now tell me,do your rom can add to the picture quality ? programs like sony pravia or else, do u think are better on you rom or other roms rather than stock rom?
DroidIt! said:
I have never personally tried a Nokia phone but wondered how the Lumia with it's 42 mp camera stacked up against other phones. Don't know if that really makes a difference or not but would be really interested to find out. Hey bldy, yeah I think with all the extra options we get to tweak in the software has made a pretty big difference. I find that I can control a lot more of the variables when it comes to taking pictures. I still do have a standalone Sony cybershot for taking pictures if I know I'm going to be taking a lot of photos,but Ithink our cameras produce pictures about on par with that.
from my Viped out one x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i had a good experiance with nokia devices.i had( nokiaclassic 6200..xpress5800 ,n8,n9,e7)and gaveup with nokia and start the android line.
i liked them cameras but non of them approuched the htc devices.
droidit felch gave this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2235072 about a bug which could be useful for picture quality.try it and u might like it and give us a replay.
bldysurgeon said:
i told you .... you are really expert. now tell me,do your rom can add to the picture quality ? programs like sony pravia or else, do u think are better on you rom or other roms rather than stock rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bravia Engine can only function on devices with a locked bootloader, if you have an unlocked bootloader, the BE isn't working, and won't for anyone. Ever.
If you have a locked bootloader the BE will be the same on every ROM (Unless somebody ports a newer version).