[Q] Which is more Stable on Wingray - Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Hello,
i want to know which rom is more stable on wingray?
1.[ROM][4.2 JB MR1] Team EOS 4 *JELLYBEAN MR1* Nightlies - Wingray / MZ604 / WIFI ONLY
2.[ROM][NIGHTLY] CM10.1 (Wingray/Stingray/Everest)
3.[ROM][4.2.1] My Android 4.2 for Xoom Wi-Fi - Stable Release
thx for answers ...

Probably all about the same. EOS is pretty stable, I haven't had too many issues, only had one freeze/crash in the last week.
Sent from my SGH-I747 using xda premium

I tried CM10.1 last night, on My Android 4.2.1 now.
I find My Android 4.2.1 a lot smoother and less bugs, CM10.1 had a few Force Closes for me and seemed sluggish, perhaps in a few versions time
I would like Chronus on non-CM roms though

thx for answer i flashed cm 10.1 ...

Related

Difference between cm9 and cm10?

Im a fan of cyanogen but i cant decide between cm9 and cm10. Im on cm9 atm. Can some help me with this?
Cm10 is the latest and greatest. Its a lot faster then cm9, and has google now and such. I would take cm10 over cm9
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
You can flash cm10 over cm9. Update gapps and clear caches.
CM10 runs really smooth. You will loose tablet mode on a lot of apps.
Check the screenshot thread in general if you want to see.
CM9 is based by Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) 4.0.X
CM10 is based by Jelly Bean (JB) 4.1.X
CM10 much faster
As stated above , much faster and has google now. There are still a few glitches with CM10, but worth upgrading just for the speed alone.
mgalexa said:
As stated above , much faster and has google now. There are still a few glitches with CM10, but worth upgrading just for the speed alone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i own a different device (Sansung Galaxy W GTi-8150)...we do not have cm10 but a fully working beta version of cm9...what i just did was to flash jelly bean libs through cwm in order to get speed of jb on on cm9...and it works....maybe you should go for that...
Shehram Ahmad said:
Well i own a different device (Sansung Galaxy W GTi-8150)...we do not have cm10 but a fully working beta version of cm9...what i just did was to flash jelly bean libs through cwm in order to get speed of jb on on cm9...and it works....maybe you should go for that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That can be a recipe for a non-booting device...
Of course cm10 works good in our tabs as omap architecture the processor is open source so developers can work well to port cm10 to our devices
I'm in cm10 now in my tab and in cm 9 in my phone (s2) as cm10 is buggy in my phone as some hardware elements are closed source so developers can not work freely in the device but this problem not found in my tab (open source hardware so cm10 work sooo good)
Sent from Galaxy S2 or Galaxy Tab2
CM10 is better

AOKP JB OR CyanogenMod 10

AOKP JB OR CyanogenMod 10
WHICH ONE DO YOU PREFER!!!
I use CM9 constantly for stability till CM10 is more stable though AOKP 4.0.4 I used that for more than a month and really liked the features so most of the time for stability I pick CM and for more (on board/stock) features I pick AOKP. Playing around with AOKP 4.1.1 it was unstable at the time but it should have gotten better but all the features that I missed and were missing from CM10 were there though CM10's build was a little more stable than AOKP 4.1.1.
Since they're both not 100% RC/stable beta then it all comes down to who gets better stability support first so you have to test them yourself and most of the great devs on our forums are keeping us up to date from the actual source. Remember more people work on CM than AOKP but like what AOKP stands for its a "Kang" of the features you like. Personally if AOKP has the stability as CM has then I would stick to AOKP.
You would just have to test it yourself or else it will be another this vs this thread and it will go on non stop. I flash a lot of things on my phone to keep testing which one I like CM9 -> CM10 -> AOKP 4.1.1 -> CM10 -> CM9
I think CM10 right now is smooth and nice, AOKP 4.1.1 is getting there but I always go back to CM9 when I need important calls or I am driving and using GPS because you don't want a random reboot to happen.
Overall I would just do a nandroid backup and flash away, if anything messes up then revert back. :good:

[Q] Is CM 10.1 Stable?

Hi,
I was just wondering if CM 10.1 is stable. I know its under the nightly section, but I am just wondering. I use this phone as my daily driver so if there are minor bugs, please list them. I am currently running CM10 right now and its perfect. Thanks
U can always do nandroid and see it for yourself. There is only one snapshot build (M1) which CM team consider to be stable(ish), other ones are nightlies. Nightlies aren't intended to be daily drivers.
Personally, i find CM 10.1 to be pretty laggy at the moment and differences between 10 are not so dramatic to bear with the instability.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
For me is CM10.1 perfectly stable. I run latest nightly, update my Nexus almost everyday I never tried CM10, so maybe it's better.
Zulda said:
For me is CM10.1 perfectly stable. I run latest nightly, update my Nexus almost everyday I never tried CM10, so maybe it's better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1

[Q] New Rom

Hi ...i have been searching for some time now for a stable JB rom..any suggestions? have looked at Eos 3 and Eos 4 but this is the first flash on my transformer and wanted input.Also where do you download Eos at ?? . looking at all the options they have and i am totally confused with build #
I would like to see Jb perform much better than Ics ..any help would be great
Thanks
EOS3 #81 with KATKernel #69 is my recommendations atm - That is JB 4.1.2
EOS4 is fairly new, a newer build of JB but has a few problems atm
If you want a fast, smooth, bug free ROM, go for EOS3 #81
4.1 is slower than 4.2 for me. TeamEOS's 4.2.2 is the best thing my tablet has seen in a long time. As stated above, there may be bugs as it's newer but I haven't experienced any show-stopper bugs or anything annoying.
You can get it from their official thread.
I have not had any bugs other than audio loss after some sleep (fix with the K.A.T Toolbox) on the EOS 4 latest ROM.
EOS 3 is stable, have not run it in a while though.
I was running the PA/CM hybrid of Mattmanwrx and it was stable.
new rom
Thanks for the replies ang info...think I will give EOS 3 a try.I was leaning that way have heard 4.2 had some bugs also might look at ray fx

[Q] IS CM stable worth to install?

Hi there mates,
I finally decided to dump the stock ROM and give it a try on custom one.
After reading a bit i think i'm starting to like Cyanogen, but since i want a good stable ROM i appreciated some opinions form anyone who is using it.
1st and really important: my stock ROM does not have any of the know issues (deep sleep probs, random reboots, battery drains etc...) so anyone know if CM 9.x stable have any of this issues?
2nd does everything work? In the CM forums i found no one complaining with "loosing" functionality's but i would like to ear from anyone that uses this on a daily basis. (i found a lot of people complaining with encryption problem and bad flashing but not about Wifi radio, camera, etc...)
3rd: Is this the best choice to use on a daily basis? Or there is a better/more stable/more fluid Rom?
Thanks to all.
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
+1 for KatKiss #226
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2362764
frederuco said:
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
frederuco said:
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
frederuco said:
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant find the links for that version... only the linaro versions...
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
frederuco said:
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Exnor said:
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is CM finally stable? I had it installed a year or so ago, but then it was still beta for the transformer. Since then I used various flavors and eventually stayed with the EOS-build. Very stable with all the options I ever need (like overclocking and gouvenor-changing). I'm still using EOS, since it's stable and performing very well. Katkiss seems to be the continuation of it, so you could try it yourself And if you don't like it, then you drop it for something else

Categories

Resources