Sometimes my phone has a blank screen and is not responding to anything, only way to wake my phone up is to remove battery when it reboots then the phone battery has been decreased like playing osmos HD... D: This problem remains with giger snap. Is this software or hardware related? Does warranty covers this?
Sent from my sending thing.
Bump
Sent from my sending thing.
Avamander said:
Bump
Sent from my sending thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats your cpu frequency ? which governor?
I don't know, Ginger Snap says that governor is SMARTASSV2 and max cpu frequency is 652 MHz and min is 320 Mhz
Sent from my sending thing.
Bunp
Sent from my sending thing.
BUMP
Sent from my sending thing.
Bump*
Sent from my sending thing.
Avamander said:
I don't know, Ginger Snap says that governor is SMARTASSV2 and max cpu frequency is 652 MHz and min is 320 Mhz
Sent from my sending thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try increasing min frequency to 480 MHz.
Okay, but what is the problem?
Sent from my sending thing.
The values are now min 480 and max 710 as I unchecked restore on boot.
Sent from my sending thing.
Avamander said:
Okay, but what is the problem?
Sent from my sending thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is that your phone needs more time to wake up, when the frequency is too low.
Also, you may have a look at this:
albert107 said:
thats what I wanted to know.
You sure about this?
In P500 it was quite opposite, because 122 and 480 has the same voltage, but every action is made faster on 480 so it consumes less energy(the same voltage but less time using it). Using 480 instead of 122 was good for both - battery and performance.
Isnt that like in Gio?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this phone related? And fixable?
Sent from my sending thing.
Bump*
Sent from my sending thing.
Your question is confusing. Just set minimum to 480. Phone will wake faster and use less battery. Too slow defeats the purpose of setting a minimum
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app
I just asked is it hardware related but... Nevermind. Now I know that it is a software related problem.
EDIT: Still same problem battery log has a blank spot
Sent from my sending thing.
Please close this thread
Sent from my sending thing.
Avamander said:
Please close this thread
Sent from my sending thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then PM a mod, if he can close this thread.
Same issue again !!! Somebody help !
Battery log:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Min frequency is 480 MHz
Max 710 MHz
Where's the problem ??
Sent from my sending thing.
Related
Qualcomm have released a new web benchmark.
http://www.talkandroid.com/46561-qu...lamo-for-benchmarking-mobile-web-performance/
Post your scores here.
Here are mine for comparison:
SGS: 552
HTC Sensation: 744
For some reason my HTC Sensation scores quite low compared to the reference one
642.
The sensation they had listed was around 900. Wonder how they pulled that off?
Mine is a sensation by the way. Sorry for not stating that.
Mine is 746.
Got a 753.
Does using wifi make a difference?
Edit: 2nd run 777.
quick question for the ppl that downloaded this app and are overclocked. while overclocked, go to the vellamo app and go to system info, under cpu do it show both cores being overclocked cause when im oc'd it shows core 1 being oc'd and core 2 as 0, but both cores show the same freq when not oc'd. so my question is, is the method we use to oc just working on 1 core?
tech_p said:
quick question for the ppl that downloaded this app and are overclocked. while overclocked, go to the vellamo app and go to system info, under cpu do it show both cores being overclocked cause when im oc'd it shows core 1 being oc'd and core 2 as 0, but both cores show the same freq when not oc'd. so my question is, is the method we use to oc just working on 1 core?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine's not OC'd and Vellamo shows min and max 0 for CPU 2.
samnada said:
Mine's not OC'd and Vellamo shows min and max 0 for CPU 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
this is what it show on mines with no overclock, both cores show being clocked the same
damn sorry for the big pic
got a 760. no overclock. seems to be around the average... not counting that 900 score it shows.
and this is what it shows oc'd
So every time I run it I get a lower score. Now I'm down to 588. What the hell? Should I be concerned?
Also mine is not oc'd. Core 1 -1188, core 2 - 0. Could that be why I'm getting such low scores?
The comparison's inevitable, here's my SGS2. 941.
i wonder how fast does a stock android score hmmmm cant wait for perm ROOT
with a few tweaks i got my sensation upto 928. im sure i could push it a bit higher too.
edit: 951 on second run.
overclocked w/bloatware removed.
The scrolling tests show how badly we need a 3d accelerated browser/user interface on the Sensation.
I got 767 on my Sensation.
The Illest 619 said:
with a few tweaks i got my sensation upto 928. im sure i could push it a bit higher too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of tweaks did you do? Just curious
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
785 on a stock sensation for me (with a carrier bloated ROM)
It would seem to me that the Infuse 4G, does not have a CPU temp sensor, just the battery temp sensor.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
What type of max temps should I be looking for, from the battery temp sensor?
Running...
- Stability Test CPU+GPI /512+ MB
- Wireless ON
- Charging w/ AC adapter
I hit 52.3 degrees celsius after about 4 hours at 1600Mhz.
Setup...
Infusion-GB Core-A2
- OC'd to 1600Mhz
- Voodoo Lagfix enabled
Rogers Gingerbread 2.3.3
- 30fps 1080p camera mod
SetCPU profiles...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Undervolting w/ Voltage Control
-100mV across the board...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997R using XDA App
Hard ?, idk. If it just gets warm, then just simply underclock it. That is what i do lol. If your playing a game, then it may get warm on stock settings but prob not. Another thing i recommend, do not always leave it overclocked. It will ruin the phone after a while, mine is only overclocked when im doing tests lol. I have heard of i9000s and such dying out after like a year being overclocked at 1.6 all the time.
what is your governor on?
correct me if im wrong but if you use on demand it will only use 1.6GHz when needed so when just sliding through homescreens it will not use as much
and will thi device really die if i overclock it for too long?
Are you ****ing serious?
God dammit. /facepalm
rhcp4ever said:
Are you ****ing serious?
God dammit. /facepalm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what?
[10char]
rhcp4ever said:
Are you ****ing serious?
God dammit. /facepalm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997R using XDA App
Okay so here is my question and please dont flame me but i am really interested in finding an answer and google has not helped Okay so if you have undervolted the following frequecies (192, 310, 384, 432, 486, and 540) all to 800mV then technically are they all consuming the same amount of power? And if this is true would it be better to make the min frequency 540MHz because this is using the same voltages as the 192MHz speed and it would get the job done faster because of the higher clock speed? Any help or input on the subject would be great
uhh, I don't think those voltages are actually holding. 540 mhz @ 800 mV isn't possible by ppl. Use command terminal emulator and check actual vdd table
as for the rest, 540 mhz will still use more power than 192, even at the same core voltage
A little guidance couldn't hurt please
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
ckck543 said:
A little guidance couldn't hurt please
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what does this mean lol? Restate if u have another question and I'll happily assist
The last time I was playing with a frequency generator, It was determined that increasing the frequency had a direct effect on voltage.
When the voltage was adjusted back to original value, the current jumped. Sufficient to say that no matter what, the overall power consumption increased with the frequency.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
How exactly would I use a terminal emu later to check my vdd table? Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
ckck543 said:
How exactly would I use a terminal emu later to check my vdd table? Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get system tuner or faux clock app and just do it from gui if you can't find it. Otherwise read the kernel thread from faux, he's got it in there.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
812mv up to 486 works perfect
Okay thanks for the help guys if anybody could post their screen shots of their voltage tab in system tuner or whatever app they are using? Just for a reference for everyone else. Here is mine
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my cellular telephone
ckck543 said:
Okay thanks for the help guys if anybody could post their screen shots of their voltage tab in system tuner or whatever app they are using? Just for a reference for everyone else. Here is mine
Sent from my cellular telephone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone will have slightly different because the same undervolting values don't work for everyone.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
How would you suggest to test for the right voltage? Just trying to learn here so any help would be just dandy
Sent from my cellular telephone
ckck543 said:
How would you suggest to test for the right voltage? Just trying to learn here so any help would be just dandy
Sent from my cellular telephone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Drop it step by step and when it reboots or locks up you've gone too far. Haha
Sent from SKYROCKET
NexusMod 4.0
Romracer 0.3
Aha that sounds like a great plan !
Sent from my cellular telephone
ckck543 said:
Aha that sounds like a great plan !
Sent from my cellular telephone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The safe spot is usually between -50 to -75. Some can get away with -100mv
xcrazydx said:
The safe spot is usually between -50 to -75. Some can get away with -100mv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm one of the lucky ones with -100 hehe
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
kr3w1337 said:
I'm one of the lucky ones with -100 hehe
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, but only at lowee frequencies
how much improvement in battery life is everyone seeing from underclocking?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
depends, but for me franky, a *&$-load lol
icenight89 said:
yeah, but only at lowee frequencies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it's global so nope, not just low frequencies.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
if ur using fauxclocm with faux's kernel how high are u OC'd. Not that it really matters, because if u look at the vdd table he procides he set the mV values for anything I would say above 1544 rather safely, so even if u are -100mV its not much of an accomplishment.
People have reported their CPUs clocked at 1200mhz after the update. Mines still at 1000. Is this correct? Thanks.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Mine is at 1200mhz.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Thread Reopened
Well, I see how this is going, and yes, it got my attention.
Thread Cleaned and now Moved to Q&A
OP has a viable question. No need to toss in idiotic comments.
MD
Mine is 1200 mhz. What app is the OP using to tell the clock speed?
I'm using Android System Info from the market.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
which app to use to measure cpu frequency?
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
AnTuTu Benchmark and Android System Info.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Yeah buddy, stock ICS leask #1. 1200!!! I've had 4 A2's and 2 out of 4 came equipped with 1200 stock ICS. I believe it's luck of the draw man. Don't sweat it, the other two were 1000 but was able to OC both at 1200 with no bootlooping issues. GL.
Sent From My Motorola Atrix 2 ICS Leaked 1.
Also at 1200.
I'm sure Moto didn't choose to put some A2's on 1200 and keep the others on 1000. The OTAs files pushed out to all the phones are identical. So what's causing these differences in clock speeds? Beats me
Look what mine says!
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
athani said:
I'm sure Moto didn't choose to put some A2's on 1200 and keep the others on 1000. The OTAs files pushed out to all the phones are identical. So what's causing these differences in clock speeds? Beats me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They may have, putting a check in place that queries the CPU's specific ID to find out what batch it's from. If it's from a good batch, 1200, if not, 1000. That's a POSSIBILITY.
Ajfink said:
They may have, putting a check in place that queries the CPU's specific ID to find out what batch it's from. If it's from a good batch, 1200, if not, 1000. That's a POSSIBILITY.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense.. I tried to OC this phone at one time and couldn't even get to 1100mhz without it freezing and doing stupid ****. I just thought I was doing something wrong. And I was so happy that I would finally be able to get to 1200mhz without having to do anything. I guess I just got the **** CPU....
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Ajfink said:
They may have, putting a check in place that queries the CPU's specific ID to find out what batch it's from. If it's from a good batch, 1200, if not, 1000. That's a POSSIBILITY.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possible. But I'm not convinced. If only some Devs could investigate.
athani said:
Possible. But I'm not convinced. If only some Devs could investigate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is really like to get an official answer, myself
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Very interesting.... I wouldn't put it past Motorola to only overclock the "good" chips, nice quality assurance there Moto . First time I heard about this I just thought "Well okay, an overclock from GB stuck through to ICS, no big deal", but it's been confirmed that isn't the case. Strange how some are overclocked and some are not. A big company like Moto shouldn't have "good" batches and "bad" batches, if that is the case we will never get an official word on this, maybe it's a kind of soak test, trying the 1.2 over clock on certain phones only..... But I don't know.
athani said:
I'm sure Moto didn't choose to put some A2's on 1200 and keep the others on 1000. The OTAs files pushed out to all the phones are identical. So what's causing these differences in clock speeds? Beats me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it does something to check if your cpu is capable of being stable at the higher speed. Unfortunately, mine is still at 1000Mhz also. I was hoping for the higher speed but not so lucky.
Its not that simple of a check to determine if it can run...
- Mine bootlooped when OC'd to 1200 on 2.3.5
- Its 1200 on 4.0 fine
- Others had it OC'd to 1200 with no problem on 2.3.5
- They have it set by default to 1000 on ICS
I made a survey about this some time ago, but almost all of my theories went down the drain...
mine stayed at 1000mhz.:banghead:
Sent from my MB865 using ICS
What's the default voltage and governor for 1200MHz enabled devices?
Hi there!
Anybody knows what cpu governor settings and cpu frequences are best for our pico? Specialy for sense 4...
Settings like in this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1778975
Thanks.
Use low frequenciess for battery back up, high for performance.. depends on you.. use ondemand governor... download SetCPU to control frequencies and governors...
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Barkat.Paki said:
Use low frequenciess for battery back up, high for performance.. depends on you.. use ondemand governor... download SetCPU to control frequencies and governors...
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was talking about settings from below attachement...sampling rate, up threshold...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Explorer using xda app-developers app
razvy79rzv said:
I was talking about settings from below attachement...sampling rate, up threshold...
View attachment 2075792
Sent from my HTC Explorer using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haven't use Antutu CPU control, I've no idea about these values.. ... Maybe @galaxyfreak will suggest and let you know what exactly are they...
Barkat.Paki said:
haven't use Antutu CPU control, I've no idea about these values.. ... Maybe @galaxyfreak will suggest and let you know what exactly are they...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use set cpu, the profiling stuff over there is really good and very customizable. Plus its free.:laugh: anyway for hd games put something like 800max and 480 min ... should solve some lag issues..
good work...
hi, read more here - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817
scout1089 said:
hi, read more here - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Watdafuq? A single post has ~1500 thanks button being pressed.
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
maybe because it was helpful and informative.. there is nothing wrong whether many thanks or less one right? important is we help one another
thanks doesnt matter, our attitude toward others does..
scout1089 said:
maybe because it was helpful and informative.. there is nothing wrong whether many thanks or less one right? important is we help one another
thanks doesnt matter, our attitude toward others does..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with you bro
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app