Database Info

Disappointing Linpack Scores

Hey guys, could someone please explain to me why my Nexus S (2.3.3) is only getting an avg score of 12 mflops while my N1 (2.3.3) is getting an avg score of 37 mflops on the Linpack app?

Because benchmarking does not equal real world performance.
Quillcomm Snapdragon processors have better performance when it comes to this particular test.
Hummingbird will excel in other specific benchmark tests.

Run a test with any 3D game or HD, if it lags, then its the device, if it runs smooth, then is the benchmark app itself that hasn't been updated to read scores due to our ota, I had the same thought and issue with quadrant but then I installed modern combat and pes11(soccer game) and both run smoothly, try smartbench 2010 its free on the market and updated for our phones.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Cool that's good to know. I'll try 3D games and compare. Thanks for the feedback.

lynkx said:
Hey guys, could someone please explain to me why my Nexus S (2.3.3) is only getting an avg score of 12 mflops while my N1 (2.3.3) is getting an avg score of 37 mflops on the Linpack app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
linpack is made for the snapdragon processors. my overclocked nexus s gets around 23 on linpack. but, lets see one of those snapdragons do this on quadrant, or get 63 fps on nenamark, or get a 37000+ on an3Dbench...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

That's a nice score. Well I just d/l Smartbench 2011. My NS got around 850 while N1 got 970, both are estimates. But I did notice that on the corridor test the NS ran it super quick while N1 was sluggish.

Benchmarks depend on what you do to your phone, from a custom rom to an overclocked kernel and other tweaks, such a lagfix do the trick, it looks awesome to hit those numbers but the device cannot be stable 24/7, not for a daily use.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Post Your Highest Quadrant Standard Scores!

My score is 2400.. The only phone ive seen higher is the Atrix 4G..
Let me know your scores on the G2x!!

Highest score I've gotten is 2732, although the highest one i have a screenshot of is 2724. I posted it in the lg g2x benchmark thread a while ago.
EDIT: just ran it on the leaked gingerbread rom and got 2805

I dunno much about benchmarking android devices, I assume it's like running one on a PC where you really want to do it with a clean install and nothing unnecessary running. If that's the case, then my phone ought to be able to do much better than this.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

earlier today on my 3rd or 4th run.

The g2x would get a much much better score in quadrant if it didn't score so low in the 2d test. It seems to score the same in the 2d test as most single core devices at around 19fps. If you look at the individual test part scores you can see that the difference in the g2x score and the sgsII score is about the difference in the 2D test score.

I can get over 2800 with EagleBlood 1.03 Gingerbread. I turn on Airplane mode, turn off auto sync, and turn on wi-fi, and get over 2800 easily.

G2x at 1.3 GHz, using quad std you can.t see the tint I/O score compared to my higher scoring NS. Any other quad i will thus post from quad adv.
I/O really kills the avg at ~1400 vs ~4500
http://www.jpct.de/an3dbenchxl/show.php?code=MjYyNzQx163391&page=0
that's a nice benchmark too
stock-stock rom....

I am getting anywhere from 2300 to 2500 when I run quadrant on my G2x.

Got a 2921 out of mine. Pretty good!

This is one of the lowest I've experienced, but who counts quadrant scores? How about smartbench 2011 for our type of phones?? Neocore scores too. Power!!

While I was installing all my apps, no less.
-bZj

EaglesBlood 1.03

EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's kernel. But benchmarks are worthless. That being said I still like high numbers so here it is.

I'm not allowed to post outside links, but my highest is 2573. Liking the numbers coming from the EagleBlood rom though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

Mine is EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's OC kernel.

I've only ran Quadrant Advanced twice and my highest score was 2700...
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

Okay got a new record on my stock rooted rom.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk

EagleBlood 1.03 + Morfic OC/UV kernel

I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:

tmdz28 said:
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060715
There you go pal.
Btw, where can i find morfic's kernel..? I see 2 kernel's in the Dev forum but none from Morfic.

[2013.07.03] CF-Bench v1.3

About
CF-Bench is (mainly) CPU and memory benchmark tool specifically designed to be able to handle multi-core devices, produce a fairly stable score, and test both native as well managed code performance.
It tests specific device properties you do not regularly see tested by other benchmarks, and runs in a set timeframe.
It does produce some "final" scores, but as with every benchmark, you should take those with a grain of salt. It is simply not theoretically possible to produce a single number that accurately describes a device's performance.
Why ?
I know, there are lots of other benchmarks. But they don't give me the numbers I'm personally interested in comparing. Few really support multi-core or test both native and Java code. This benchmark is also supposed to give a more "stable" score compared to some others.
Current scores
Here are a number of scores reached by tested devices:
Samsung Galaxy S2 @ 2x1200 - 6498
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v @ 2x1000 - 5188
HTC Sensation @ 2x1188 - 5174
Motorola Atrix @ 2x1000 - 5136
HTC Thunderbolt @ 1920 - 4663
Motorola Droid X @ 1200 - 2792
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7" @ 1000 - 2401
Samsung Galaxy S @ 1000 - 2205
HTC HD2 @ 1536 - 2041
Samsung Apollo @ 667 - 488
HTC Hero @ 748 - 359
HTC Dream (G1) @ 528 - 191
Of course, you should really keep in mind that the three different scores listed at the bottom of the app are pretty meaningless
Download
Market link (mobile): market://details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
Market link (desktop): https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

-- reserved --

-- also reserved --

Will happily start low end scores
Update:
HTC Legend @767 906
Fyi it regersters the max kernel clockspeed not the actual
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

50-3 said:
Will happily start low end scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry, I got the high end captivate at 1.7 Ghz

Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500

Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3045 I forgot it was dual processor capable.

Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should see if any Nexus s 4g users running trinity Kernal can run it for you as there getting ridiculous scores on quadrant
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Sent from my ThunderBolt using Tapatalk

hijackerjack said:
HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dang, that is by far the highest single-core score I've seen!

Gonna try this out, will post back with score
Samsung Galaxy S 2 - 5957.

SGS II 6346 - Running in the middle of my day. not setup for a benchmark run...

Galaxy S Vibrant: I got a 2211 on it.
I wished it incorporated GPU power into the score as well

2478 with my Nexus S, 5276 with my Xoom.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

SGS2 @ 1300Mhz - 7200+ (I accidentally closed and can't remember the number, but it was like 7213. I'm running it again )

5055 on Atrix.

6877 - T-mobile LG G2x

6479 without tweaks Stock-Rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

With my OC SGS II @1400 Mhz i have 7383.

HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 998Mhz -2586
HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 1190Mhz -3078

{BENCH WARS} / SETTINGS & CONFIGURATION Discussion

Just a thread to post screen shots of your Sensations Bench scores, and discuss what settings, apps, scripts, etc. you're using ,to see how far we can take our dual core and how much we can learn about optimal settings, etc. Lets see who can be the fastest and how they got there. People on Sense Roms feel free to post here too and have your Sense Wars. AOSP ROMs will almost always be higher on bench scores since there is less bogging down the system.
Benches can be manipulated.
For example- turning up the settings/overclocking to run the phone harder and at maximum rates. They may also be manipulated in other fashions. Feel free to question any score.
No SS=No proof.
Use whatever Bench you want. Antutu and CF-Bench are the standards, as Quadrant often gives crazy high or low scores on its own. Though no bench is truly accurate, because when ran at max with Airplane Mode on, they never return the same number. Leaving you to kind of weed out the bad tests and average out your score. They can be used to get a good general idea of performance related settings.
They should also be done at daily driver settings and clocks to find out what it kind of speed we can get out of our DD settings.
Be honest about your settings. This is only for fun and/or seeing what set ups/numbers/clockings work. Which save battery, etc.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
On CM7 Alpha9.
Running System Tuner Pro maxing both cores at 1.78. Faux CM7 0.2.0 1.78 Kernel.
V6 Supercharger Script set to max ram 100m(setting number 11 or 12)
I like to call this screenshot
"Running with Tabs!"
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this

CF Bench
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this

Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e

idavid_ said:
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha. Already a joker.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this

sinisin said:
Ha. Already a joker.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just had to post it lol. Seriously though, I get around 2150 on Quadrant, but it's a **** benchmark that can be easily manipulated anyway (see pic above)
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e

sinisin said:
Ha. Already a joker.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His point is bench marks mean jack sh#t!

idavid_ said:
I just had to post it lol. Seriously though, I get around 2150 on Quadrant, but it's a **** benchmark that can be easily manipulated anyway (see pic above)
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill post SS later when I get my new phone in the mail. (Bricked the old one somehow).
1.56Ghz...
My CF bench best is 7040-CM7 build 9, faux kernel (latest)
Quadrant is 4014
Antutu is 6700
Matt

Behold_this said:
His point is bench marks mean jack sh#t!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benches shouldn't be lived by. Quadrant is a very flawed test IMO. On my daily driver settings this is my score. So this is why I say post your settings as well so we can find(hopefully) a good general performance standard for settings/mods/scripts, etc.
Same settings. Just not locking CPU1 online. Also left on max clock.
Sent from where ever I was when I posted this

This is 1188mhz obviously.
V6 Supercharger set at Max Ram with HTK Launcher.
No second core forced on.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium

Quadrant 2.0

So the new quadrant app is actually somewhat useful. It breaks down the score by category.
Here is what I got the first time I ran it:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is on eclipse 1.3 with pbj kernel and max frequency at 800mhz and conservative governor.
Obviously i have a low cpu score, but somehow i have a massive lead in i/o over nexus s and gnex but not the tab. Do they still use rfs or something? Also everything has a substantial lead in 2d/3d over the gnex, which is strange considering they all have the same gpu and the gnex is clocked faster.
Sent from my pocket-sized, Linux-based computer using electromagnetic radiation... and Tapatalk.

JihadSquad said:
So the new quadrant app is actually somewhat useful. It breaks down the score by category.
Here is what I got the first time I ran it:
This is on eclipse 1.3 with pbj kernel and max frequency at 800mhz and conservative governor.
Obviously i have a low cpu score, but somehow i have a massive lead in i/o over nexus s and gnex but not the tab. Do they still use rfs or something? Also everything has a substantial lead in 2d/3d over the gnex, which is strange considering they all have the same gpu and the gnex is clocked faster.
Sent from my pocket-sized, Linux-based computer using electromagnetic radiation... and Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There must be a glitch, or they are not showing the right scores for the other devices. I got scores in the 2100's, better than the galaxy nexus!
Eclipse 1.2 ROM
KAK & Supercharged!

anyone notice the test takes a lot longer now?

bvsbutthd101 said:
anyone notice the test takes a lot longer now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah probably because the test is meant for new phones with 1ghz single core/higher speed dual core processors, not like OG Droid and HTC Hero.

Transformer prime gets around 4000, yikes
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App

I've always found AnTuTu to be a better benchmark. It didn't suffer the seemingly random variability that Quadrant suffered. I'll have to check out the new version of Quadrant to see how it is.