[2013.07.03] CF-Bench v1.3 - Android Apps and Games

About
CF-Bench is (mainly) CPU and memory benchmark tool specifically designed to be able to handle multi-core devices, produce a fairly stable score, and test both native as well managed code performance.
It tests specific device properties you do not regularly see tested by other benchmarks, and runs in a set timeframe.
It does produce some "final" scores, but as with every benchmark, you should take those with a grain of salt. It is simply not theoretically possible to produce a single number that accurately describes a device's performance.
Why ?
I know, there are lots of other benchmarks. But they don't give me the numbers I'm personally interested in comparing. Few really support multi-core or test both native and Java code. This benchmark is also supposed to give a more "stable" score compared to some others.
Current scores
Here are a number of scores reached by tested devices:
Samsung Galaxy S2 @ 2x1200 - 6498
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v @ 2x1000 - 5188
HTC Sensation @ 2x1188 - 5174
Motorola Atrix @ 2x1000 - 5136
HTC Thunderbolt @ 1920 - 4663
Motorola Droid X @ 1200 - 2792
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7" @ 1000 - 2401
Samsung Galaxy S @ 1000 - 2205
HTC HD2 @ 1536 - 2041
Samsung Apollo @ 667 - 488
HTC Hero @ 748 - 359
HTC Dream (G1) @ 528 - 191
Of course, you should really keep in mind that the three different scores listed at the bottom of the app are pretty meaningless
Download
Market link (mobile): market://details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
Market link (desktop): https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

-- reserved --

-- also reserved --

Will happily start low end scores
Update:
HTC Legend @767 906
Fyi it regersters the max kernel clockspeed not the actual
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

50-3 said:
Will happily start low end scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry, I got the high end captivate at 1.7 Ghz

Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500

Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3045 I forgot it was dual processor capable.

Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should see if any Nexus s 4g users running trinity Kernal can run it for you as there getting ridiculous scores on quadrant
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Sent from my ThunderBolt using Tapatalk

hijackerjack said:
HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dang, that is by far the highest single-core score I've seen!

Gonna try this out, will post back with score
Samsung Galaxy S 2 - 5957.

SGS II 6346 - Running in the middle of my day. not setup for a benchmark run...

Galaxy S Vibrant: I got a 2211 on it.
I wished it incorporated GPU power into the score as well

2478 with my Nexus S, 5276 with my Xoom.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

SGS2 @ 1300Mhz - 7200+ (I accidentally closed and can't remember the number, but it was like 7213. I'm running it again )

5055 on Atrix.

6877 - T-mobile LG G2x

6479 without tweaks Stock-Rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

With my OC SGS II @1400 Mhz i have 7383.

HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 998Mhz -2586
HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 1190Mhz -3078

Related

Post Your Highest Quadrant Standard Scores!

My score is 2400.. The only phone ive seen higher is the Atrix 4G..
Let me know your scores on the G2x!!
Highest score I've gotten is 2732, although the highest one i have a screenshot of is 2724. I posted it in the lg g2x benchmark thread a while ago.
EDIT: just ran it on the leaked gingerbread rom and got 2805
I dunno much about benchmarking android devices, I assume it's like running one on a PC where you really want to do it with a clean install and nothing unnecessary running. If that's the case, then my phone ought to be able to do much better than this.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
earlier today on my 3rd or 4th run.
The g2x would get a much much better score in quadrant if it didn't score so low in the 2d test. It seems to score the same in the 2d test as most single core devices at around 19fps. If you look at the individual test part scores you can see that the difference in the g2x score and the sgsII score is about the difference in the 2D test score.
I can get over 2800 with EagleBlood 1.03 Gingerbread. I turn on Airplane mode, turn off auto sync, and turn on wi-fi, and get over 2800 easily.
G2x at 1.3 GHz, using quad std you can.t see the tint I/O score compared to my higher scoring NS. Any other quad i will thus post from quad adv.
I/O really kills the avg at ~1400 vs ~4500
http://www.jpct.de/an3dbenchxl/show.php?code=MjYyNzQx163391&page=0
that's a nice benchmark too
stock-stock rom....
I am getting anywhere from 2300 to 2500 when I run quadrant on my G2x.
Got a 2921 out of mine. Pretty good!
This is one of the lowest I've experienced, but who counts quadrant scores? How about smartbench 2011 for our type of phones?? Neocore scores too. Power!!
While I was installing all my apps, no less.
-bZj
EaglesBlood 1.03
EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's kernel. But benchmarks are worthless. That being said I still like high numbers so here it is.
I'm not allowed to post outside links, but my highest is 2573. Liking the numbers coming from the EagleBlood rom though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Mine is EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's OC kernel.
I've only ran Quadrant Advanced twice and my highest score was 2700...
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Okay got a new record on my stock rooted rom.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
EagleBlood 1.03 + Morfic OC/UV kernel
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
tmdz28 said:
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060715
There you go pal.
Btw, where can i find morfic's kernel..? I see 2 kernel's in the Dev forum but none from Morfic.

New Web Benchmark Vellamo

Qualcomm have released a new web benchmark.
http://www.talkandroid.com/46561-qu...lamo-for-benchmarking-mobile-web-performance/
Post your scores here.
Here are mine for comparison:
SGS: 552
HTC Sensation: 744
For some reason my HTC Sensation scores quite low compared to the reference one
642.
The sensation they had listed was around 900. Wonder how they pulled that off?
Mine is a sensation by the way. Sorry for not stating that.
Mine is 746.
Got a 753.
Does using wifi make a difference?
Edit: 2nd run 777.
quick question for the ppl that downloaded this app and are overclocked. while overclocked, go to the vellamo app and go to system info, under cpu do it show both cores being overclocked cause when im oc'd it shows core 1 being oc'd and core 2 as 0, but both cores show the same freq when not oc'd. so my question is, is the method we use to oc just working on 1 core?
tech_p said:
quick question for the ppl that downloaded this app and are overclocked. while overclocked, go to the vellamo app and go to system info, under cpu do it show both cores being overclocked cause when im oc'd it shows core 1 being oc'd and core 2 as 0, but both cores show the same freq when not oc'd. so my question is, is the method we use to oc just working on 1 core?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine's not OC'd and Vellamo shows min and max 0 for CPU 2.
samnada said:
Mine's not OC'd and Vellamo shows min and max 0 for CPU 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
this is what it show on mines with no overclock, both cores show being clocked the same
damn sorry for the big pic
got a 760. no overclock. seems to be around the average... not counting that 900 score it shows.
and this is what it shows oc'd
So every time I run it I get a lower score. Now I'm down to 588. What the hell? Should I be concerned?
Also mine is not oc'd. Core 1 -1188, core 2 - 0. Could that be why I'm getting such low scores?
The comparison's inevitable, here's my SGS2. 941.
i wonder how fast does a stock android score hmmmm cant wait for perm ROOT
with a few tweaks i got my sensation upto 928. im sure i could push it a bit higher too.
edit: 951 on second run.
overclocked w/bloatware removed.
The scrolling tests show how badly we need a 3d accelerated browser/user interface on the Sensation.
I got 767 on my Sensation.
The Illest 619 said:
with a few tweaks i got my sensation upto 928. im sure i could push it a bit higher too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of tweaks did you do? Just curious
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App

			
				
785 on a stock sensation for me (with a carrier bloated ROM)

samsung galaxy r Quadrant benchmark score

Hello,
not that those numbers matter so much but just out of curiosity why the new samsung with the same chipset as the o2x scores so much higher in Quadrant?
Is it because of the 1GB of RAM?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
-sandro- said:
Hello,
not that those numbers matter so much but just out of curiosity why the new samsung with the same chipset as the o2x scores so much higher in Quadrant?
Is it because of the 1GB of RAM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
benchmark pi i got around 505-600, so, i can't say those number is correct, quadrant benchmark?? i can't say a word about it, it ahead galaxy s2? it's really strange
i get 3400-3500 in quadrant at 1 ghz, so it not so strange. samsung just make better software.
It has 2.6.37 kernel.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
smokeweedevery said:
i get 3700-3800 in quadrant at 1 ghz, so it not so strange. samsung just make better software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, what phone?
I get 2600-2800 with cm 127 nigthly :|
optimus 2x on cm7 and vorkkernel, i get 3400-3500 at 1ghz.
I get 3000 Points with stock rom and NeoBlaze, with the stock kernel I get 2700.
Yea with lots of tweaks lol. But the galaxy r is on stock.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk
smokeweedevery said:
optimus 2x on cm7 and vorkkernel, i get 3400-3500 at 1ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
isn't the kernel that comes with cm7 nightly at 1ghz too?
better kernal...more ram and gingerbread tweaks....i really dont know but it uses a slightly updated gpu shader speed...(update i checked but it uses same hardware except ram of o2x....no shader speed change...remains same 300mhz....)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpC58PwVFLo&feature=player_embedded
I've never seen my LG so fast...
We really need better software.
tomasiqu said:
I've never seen my LG so fast...
We really need better software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.6.36 Or above kernel
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Some necroposting...but it has 600 mhz...
i may be corrected but i think the galaxy r has uses EXT 4, while our o2x uses EXT 3 when referenced as stock, giving the o2x a considerably lesser score in quadrant
quadrant is outdated and no use for newer phones, those scores mean nothing as far as im aware quadrant STILL does not properly support dual core devices.
Try cf-bench, made by the creator of chainfire3d, try at standard clock speed then try cloakk the cpu to match that of the sgs2 and you will see that the tegra 2 device out performs its rivals in many areas when the over clock is matched. and sometimes even when is lower.
really sick of seeing quadrant its such a crap app.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
eraldo said:
quadrant is outdated and no use for newer phones, those scores mean nothing as far as im aware quadrant STILL does not properly support dual core devices.
Try cf-bench, made by the creator of chainfire3d, try at standard clock speed then try cloakk the cpu to match that of the sgs2 and you will see that the tegra 2 device out performs its rivals in many areas when the over clock is matched. and sometimes even when is lower.
really sick of seeing quadrant its such a crap app.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my Signature says it all, its only at 1.4 overclock as well. good effort on O2X's half (;
Supupa said:
my Signature says it all, its only at 1.4 overclock as well. good effort on O2X's half (;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep same, just shows how totaly off quadrant is, antutu benchmark is also up to date.
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA Premium App
I did some comparison with my sisters htc sensation (1.2ghz dualcore) and my 2x both on stock rom and with quadrant htc got 2200-2350 lg got 2600-2750
Antutu benchmark htc 4600-4750
and lg 4850-4990.is 2x really better than htc sensation?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
luka2858 said:
I did some comparison with my sisters htc sensation (1.2ghz dualcore) and my 2x both on stock rom and with quadrant htc got 2200-2350 lg got 2600-2750
Antutu benchmark htc 4600-4750
and lg 4850-4990.is 2x really better than htc sensation?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but the stock rom is crap, and if the o2x tegra 2 chip was released overclocked like the sgs2 was then the o2x would get better stats, the sgs2 gpu is good but the tegra gpu is way better with 3d stuff and that's whats important as we get into more advanced games.
I take it you have not rooted or installed any custom roms so i suggest you do, it will open up your phone to better things and increase performance by 100% compared to that crappy stock rom.

Moat low end phone contest!

So , I was a little bored and decided to make a game, Among all of you, Who has the most liw quality phone? BTW, To make oit harder, It should be your main phone.
Sent from my LG-P350 using xda app-developers app
Lol funny contest
My main phone is the Motorola Flipside. 720 mhz processor, 512 mb RAM, 3.1 inch HVGA (320x480px) screen. And it has a giant next to useless trackpad.
I actually got that used recently, my main phone up until I got the flipside about 2 weeks ago was the CLIQ. First ever motorola android phone, and it has the second lowest specs on a phone to date. 528 mhz processor, 256 mb RAM. I think the only phone lower than it is the G1 and MT3G (which have the same internals). Mind you, despite it being a 528 mhz (only 72 less than the optimus one series, og droid) it was a total piece of junk! Even overclocked to 750 mhz it lagged on angry birds. Gotta get some bonus points for living with that until just a couple weeks ago....
Sent from my MB508 using xda premium
Zte Blade
600 MHz processor. 512 MB ram.
But it has ICS
-_-
I'm on a og Droid now. Oc to 1000mhz. It ain't worse than the first smartphone I had
The Samsung transform damn near switched to iPhone after that rascal!!!
Sent from my Droid using xda premium
This is for my kids they have the
ZTE X500 They love that phone.
It's there second ANDROID smartphone.
They had a HTC G1 before that.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I think I win in this competition if you ask me.
500 MHz processor
384MB of RAM
No GPU
QVGA
120 DPI
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
I once had a 400 mhz phone that could make calls !! I paid 100 euros for it super stupid...
Sent from my GT-S6500D using xda premium
Herkey said:
definitely i win this game.
208MHz processor + built-in 19.5MB memory = my 2 sim 2 standby phone . :crying: this is what my phone looks like , boutght from TD a while back
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started laughing when. I seen the pic..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Herkey said:
definitely i win this game.
208MHz processor + built-in 19.5MB memory = my 2 sim 2 standby phone . :crying: this is what my phone looks like , boutght from TD a while back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What phone is that and what OS is it running???
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I either use my g1 with android 1.0 and faulty hardware or my old Nokia. From 1990. Like the one that can smash through walls. Beat dat
Sent from my chicken using xda app-developers app
I can't play this game, I'm certain to be the loser thus far -assuming the judging criteria and winner is based on "lowest" performing phone!
Motorola ATRIX™ 2 MB865
TI OMAP 4430 Processor
qHD (960 x 540), non-PenTile
1 GB DDR Ram / 32 GB external storage
Overclocked to 1.25GHz
Underclocked to 220MHz
GPU Overclock to 440MHz
Net speed tweaks
Ram Speed tweaks
Hotweiss' Radio Mod
Sent from my Atari Falcon030
Software/support wise I think I have a winner.
The g2x.
Dual core tegra2 1ghz
512mb of ram (weak)
Released only a year ago with no support past 2.3.4.... hardware wise it isn't bad but after promised a pentaband super phone here I am a year later with 2g and gingerbread.
Pin it to Win it.

[BENCHMARKS] All benchmark results @ one place

So, its just too hard to find and compare different benchmark results of different devices. There should be one thread to collect them. Posts your results here, with device name, revision, ROM version, clock speed and other stuff needed
These are welcomed but not exhaustive list of current benches:
3DMark by Futuremark Oy
Basemark X by Rightware
Epic Citadel
Mobile GPU Mark
Relative benchmark
GLBenchmark 3D benchmark
GFXBench 3.0 3D Manhattan
Antutu v3
CF-Bench
PassMark PerformanceTest
Vellamo Mobile Benchmark
Androbench
Browsermark browser test
Peacekeeper browser test
Octane js benchmark
Kraken js benchmark
Sunspider js benchmark
V8 js benchmark
Why not start it off with a good old single core?
This is my Xperia arc s, which has a single core processor @ 1.4ghz over clocked to 1.6ghz, Adreno 205 graphics and 512mb Ram.
It is running the rom Racing Bean by yours truly (not published to its own thread yet). This is a Cm10 based rom with loads of tweaks and features etc. Its kernel is Arc Fusion V4.0.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It beats some dual core devices
Yeah you know, no big deal. Phone and setup is in my sig.
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Boring. Guys, I mean there's already billion antutu+quadrant threads, we need more "real life" bench results, like peacekeeper, kraken, browser stuff, and 3D GPU comparing. antutu is not very relevant to everyday's activities, imho, it's just too synthetic like linpack etc
Ok, how about this?
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz. Jedi X 8 and Note2core kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
Ok, how about this?
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz. Jedi X 8 and Note2core kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its funny to think that the iPhone 5 gets 1600.
Apple: "Technology that's years ahead".
Haha this is true. And the new iPad 4 only reaches about 1750. Exynos kicks arse!
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Epic Citadel 42fps
Adreno 225 android 4.1.2 LG-F160
Htc one X 4.1.1 stock not rooted
Sent from my HTC One X
Android x86 4.0 ICS on my 15.6 inch non-touchscreen 1.5 inch thick asus "tablet". (intel core i5 2450m Sandy Bridge)
Antutu
Nexus 10 benchmarks (STOCK):
Epic Citadel
50.5fps on High quality
Sunspider
tcb4 said:
Android x86 4.0 ICS on my 15.6 inch non-touchscreen 1.5 inch thick asus "tablet". (intel core i5 2450m Sandy Bridge)
Antutu
Nexus 10 benchmarks (STOCK):
Epic Citadel
50.5fps on High quality
Sunspider
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow those benchs r no doubt of an i5
sent from an Galaxy s3 GT I9300
Running perseus kernel 6 , XELLA 4.1.2 leaked build
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1784401
Dont click,you might regret , I won't be responsible if you brick ur head
Just got my new Xiaomi MI2
http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_2-4928.php
I immediately run antutu to verfy if I got the real device, not the fake knock-offs.
These are the results from factory miui rom without tweaks.
very satisfied with this phone right now.
What is a 2ghz note 2 doing there
sent fromXperia sT21i
Everything stock
He probably got it up to 2 ghz and it was stable enough to just run one benchmark before it crashed and started bootlooping lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda premium
Good old galaxy s 1 android 4.2.1 keep in mind its running a live wallpaper and loaded down with widgets lol The benchmark says it crap but user experience is truly awesome no lag
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Ak kernel , cm 10.1 nightly on my gnex , wish I could've broke 10k but ehhh...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
Huawei Vision. Single core and adreno 205. Clocked to 1,5Ghz with IceColdSandwich ROM + thunderbolt
Billy Madison said:
So, its just too hard to find and compare different benchmark results of different devices. There should be one thread to collect them. Posts your results here, with device name, revision, ROM version, clock speed and other stuff needed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eee PC image of Android-x86 ICS 4.0.4
VMware Player 5.0.1
Homebuilt i7-3770K stock speeds
-- Play3r
play3r said:
Eee PC image of Android-x86 ICS 4.0.4
VMware Player 5.0.1
Homebuilt i7-3770K stock speeds
-- Play3r
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For a CPU with 4 cores, 8 threads, 8mb cache and a speed of 3.5ghz, that is a extremely bad result.
Try getting a better Android emulator and update Antutu benchmark to at least v3.0
Source: http://ark.intel.com/m/products/65523

Categories

Resources