Database Info

Offically OC'ed to 1.5 ghz

Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Not my work just fyo

It's awesome. I just turned 2532 on quadrant
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

jonathanphx1 said:
Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post this kind of stuff in general, if ur not releasing something. This crap clogs up the forums . Save this stuff for twitter.

finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.

You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Jaywan said:
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the free section of the free Rom Manager app.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Jaywan said:
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.

babybacon said:
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is so true. I underclocked my phone to 768MHz to try out how it would work for a day. I ended up entirely forgetting I had done that until I ran a benchmark.

seeing all this is amazing, I am very tempted to try it out, but this beast is super fast with having to OC it, lol

destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you're right or not but I just flashed the 1.5 kernel and at 1.4 this thing is as fast as a computer..I hope you're right because I don't wanna go back to 1ghz..
Got 2016 quadrant after a reboot which is 300 higher than I got at 1 gig..

http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/specs
Right below the dual core, High performance Smart Phones section. MSM8655 is our processor, it comes @ 1.0ghz, plam pre3 has the same and it comes @ 1.4ghz. The chip can take it but I think it was lowered for battery concern. I notice a lot of speed just flying through different programs when OC to 1.5, it opens them much faster, could be the I/O tweaks as well though. As for PC, mine puts out 42 gflops compared to my phones 49 mflops, still a long way off, thats 0.001% of the processing power. This phone is no slouch, so I guess it speaks more for my computers power.

sweet....im just gonna run it at 1.4 and since i have the 2750 battery i'm not gonna worry about battery life at all. i love this phone right now..

babybacon said:
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is the 1.8ghz kernel can someone post or pm me the link to it...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Pulled 2310 on quadrant.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

this thing is ridiculous at 1.5 I cant wait to see 2+

battery life at 1.5 seems at least the same if not better than at 1.0

Had the same CPU on my inspire - 1.6 was basically the highest I could take it without crashing.

OP will we can u make one for 2.3.3 sense so I can port this Rom also a asop 2.2 kernel for my liquidmetal plz..
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

[2013.07.03] CF-Bench v1.3

About
CF-Bench is (mainly) CPU and memory benchmark tool specifically designed to be able to handle multi-core devices, produce a fairly stable score, and test both native as well managed code performance.
It tests specific device properties you do not regularly see tested by other benchmarks, and runs in a set timeframe.
It does produce some "final" scores, but as with every benchmark, you should take those with a grain of salt. It is simply not theoretically possible to produce a single number that accurately describes a device's performance.
Why ?
I know, there are lots of other benchmarks. But they don't give me the numbers I'm personally interested in comparing. Few really support multi-core or test both native and Java code. This benchmark is also supposed to give a more "stable" score compared to some others.
Current scores
Here are a number of scores reached by tested devices:
Samsung Galaxy S2 @ 2x1200 - 6498
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v @ 2x1000 - 5188
HTC Sensation @ 2x1188 - 5174
Motorola Atrix @ 2x1000 - 5136
HTC Thunderbolt @ 1920 - 4663
Motorola Droid X @ 1200 - 2792
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7" @ 1000 - 2401
Samsung Galaxy S @ 1000 - 2205
HTC HD2 @ 1536 - 2041
Samsung Apollo @ 667 - 488
HTC Hero @ 748 - 359
HTC Dream (G1) @ 528 - 191
Of course, you should really keep in mind that the three different scores listed at the bottom of the app are pretty meaningless
Download
Market link (mobile): market://details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
Market link (desktop): https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

-- reserved --

-- also reserved --

Will happily start low end scores
Update:
HTC Legend @767 906
Fyi it regersters the max kernel clockspeed not the actual
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

50-3 said:
Will happily start low end scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry, I got the high end captivate at 1.7 Ghz

Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500

Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3045 I forgot it was dual processor capable.

Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should see if any Nexus s 4g users running trinity Kernal can run it for you as there getting ridiculous scores on quadrant
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App

HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Sent from my ThunderBolt using Tapatalk

hijackerjack said:
HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dang, that is by far the highest single-core score I've seen!

Gonna try this out, will post back with score
Samsung Galaxy S 2 - 5957.

SGS II 6346 - Running in the middle of my day. not setup for a benchmark run...

Galaxy S Vibrant: I got a 2211 on it.
I wished it incorporated GPU power into the score as well

2478 with my Nexus S, 5276 with my Xoom.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

SGS2 @ 1300Mhz - 7200+ (I accidentally closed and can't remember the number, but it was like 7213. I'm running it again )

5055 on Atrix.

6877 - T-mobile LG G2x

6479 without tweaks Stock-Rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

With my OC SGS II @1400 Mhz i have 7383.

HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 998Mhz -2586
HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 1190Mhz -3078

[LEAK] [VIDEO] Nexus Prime / Android Ice Cream Sandwich

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
http://www.gadget.ro/nexus-prime-aka-samsung-galaxy-nexus-foto-si-video/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tFEcBF7kpW8
We also have a picture and a front clip. It is not official, but it seems that bgr.com was right.
- Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
- 4.65-inch screen, resolution 1280 x 720 pixel AMOLED HD Super curved glass
- TI OMAP 4460 processor dual-core Cortex A9 at 1.2GHz, 1GB RAM, 32 GB internal memory
- 5 megapixel camera that shoots in 1080p and 1.3 megapixel video call;
- LTE or HSPA (depending on the operator), Wi-Fi a / b / g / n, NFC
- 1750 mAh battery, 9.9 mm thick.
Official information - next Tuesday. It seems we are talking about a small display of 4.65 inches.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Enjoy!
Video FLV (Sorry).
http://www.multiupload.com/L3HXA9Y3WP
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=HJ6MIVQR
http://www.uploadhere.com/USUS4NDZUR
http://www.uploadking.com/F78UBNWXLI
http://depositfiles.com/files/ck74l2uxh
http://hotfile.com/dl/131689561/e384995/Nexus_Prime_-_video.flv.html
http://uploading.com/files/e7dc7ad8/Nexus+Prime+-+video.flv/

Looking good, but it seems the video's been removed off youtube.

Can't see the video as of now but the photo and specs look awesome.
Looks a lot like the nexus s also which is a good thing.
Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App

I'll upload the video ;-).
Knew this would happen, quickly saved the video from youtube.
EDIT: Uploaded!

This website has videos and screenshots: http://stiri-telefoane.mobilissimo....clara-in-premiera-pe-mobilissimoro_11172.html
Most importantly, the phone is codenamed 'Tuna'. Finally a name!!

I bet the quoted specs are wrong.

Screenshots!
http://www.gadget.ro/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oggY03v6aXo&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Ugly dock icons! Come on guys!!! Ok, we can change them, but default ones should be MUCH better! Very disappointed.

ernexto said:
Ugly icons! Come on guys!!! Ok, we can change them, but default ones should be MUCH better! Very disappointed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I liked the icons
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium

AM I the only one seeing a really big problem here?
OMAP4460's GPU is a PowerVR SGX540, that's the same one in Nexus S.

Readerx said:
AM I the only one seeing a really big problem here?
OMAP4460's GPU is a PowerVR SGX540, that's the same one in Nexus S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be bad probably if true unless icecream uses less gpu power or something
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium

zeekiz said:
Screenshots!
http://www.gadget.ro/android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tuna? Model name

some how all the above looks pretty fake to me

Here is another link, because the other ones didnt work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0CPXYssjFo

Waiting for .... Android Ice Cream Sandwich

AllGamer said:
some how all the above looks pretty fake to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats just what I was thinking when I saw this
Well, we'll just see

Readerx said:
AM I the only one seeing a really big problem here?
OMAP4460's GPU is a PowerVR SGX540, that's the same one in Nexus S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not great but the clock frequency seems to be almost twice as high for the GPU, 384MHz compared to 200MHz, so it it isn't that bad. SGX540 is still a competititve GPU.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_OMAP

DerJonathan said:
Thats just what I was thinking when I saw this
Well, we'll just see
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure those hands have never been outside.

I think it is a fail before the start. I do not get where the hell Samsung got info that most of the users like 4.65" phone? I mean, if I want such screen size - I can buy a 5" tablet.

[BENCHMARKS] All benchmark results @ one place

So, its just too hard to find and compare different benchmark results of different devices. There should be one thread to collect them. Posts your results here, with device name, revision, ROM version, clock speed and other stuff needed
These are welcomed but not exhaustive list of current benches:
3DMark by Futuremark Oy
Basemark X by Rightware
Epic Citadel
Mobile GPU Mark
Relative benchmark
GLBenchmark 3D benchmark
GFXBench 3.0 3D Manhattan
Antutu v3
CF-Bench
PassMark PerformanceTest
Vellamo Mobile Benchmark
Androbench
Browsermark browser test
Peacekeeper browser test
Octane js benchmark
Kraken js benchmark
Sunspider js benchmark
V8 js benchmark

Why not start it off with a good old single core?
This is my Xperia arc s, which has a single core processor @ 1.4ghz over clocked to 1.6ghz, Adreno 205 graphics and 512mb Ram.
It is running the rom Racing Bean by yours truly (not published to its own thread yet). This is a Cm10 based rom with loads of tweaks and features etc. Its kernel is Arc Fusion V4.0.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It beats some dual core devices

Yeah you know, no big deal. Phone and setup is in my sig.

Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium

Boring. Guys, I mean there's already billion antutu+quadrant threads, we need more "real life" bench results, like peacekeeper, kraken, browser stuff, and 3D GPU comparing. antutu is not very relevant to everyday's activities, imho, it's just too synthetic like linpack etc

Ok, how about this?
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz. Jedi X 8 and Note2core kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium

tmb993 said:
Ok, how about this?
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz. Jedi X 8 and Note2core kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its funny to think that the iPhone 5 gets 1600.
Apple: "Technology that's years ahead".

Haha this is true. And the new iPad 4 only reaches about 1750. Exynos kicks arse!
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium

Epic Citadel 42fps
Adreno 225 android 4.1.2 LG-F160

Htc one X 4.1.1 stock not rooted
Sent from my HTC One X

Android x86 4.0 ICS on my 15.6 inch non-touchscreen 1.5 inch thick asus "tablet". (intel core i5 2450m Sandy Bridge)
Antutu
Nexus 10 benchmarks (STOCK):
Epic Citadel
50.5fps on High quality
Sunspider

tcb4 said:
Android x86 4.0 ICS on my 15.6 inch non-touchscreen 1.5 inch thick asus "tablet". (intel core i5 2450m Sandy Bridge)
Antutu
Nexus 10 benchmarks (STOCK):
Epic Citadel
50.5fps on High quality
Sunspider
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow those benchs r no doubt of an i5
sent from an Galaxy s3 GT I9300
Running perseus kernel 6 , XELLA 4.1.2 leaked build
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1784401
Dont click,you might regret , I won't be responsible if you brick ur head

Just got my new Xiaomi MI2
http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_2-4928.php
I immediately run antutu to verfy if I got the real device, not the fake knock-offs.
These are the results from factory miui rom without tweaks.
very satisfied with this phone right now.

What is a 2ghz note 2 doing there
sent fromXperia sT21i
Everything stock

He probably got it up to 2 ghz and it was stable enough to just run one benchmark before it crashed and started bootlooping lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda premium

Good old galaxy s 1 android 4.2.1 keep in mind its running a live wallpaper and loaded down with widgets lol The benchmark says it crap but user experience is truly awesome no lag
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Ak kernel , cm 10.1 nightly on my gnex , wish I could've broke 10k but ehhh...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2

Huawei Vision. Single core and adreno 205. Clocked to 1,5Ghz with IceColdSandwich ROM + thunderbolt

Billy Madison said:
So, its just too hard to find and compare different benchmark results of different devices. There should be one thread to collect them. Posts your results here, with device name, revision, ROM version, clock speed and other stuff needed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eee PC image of Android-x86 ICS 4.0.4
VMware Player 5.0.1
Homebuilt i7-3770K stock speeds
-- Play3r

play3r said:
Eee PC image of Android-x86 ICS 4.0.4
VMware Player 5.0.1
Homebuilt i7-3770K stock speeds
-- Play3r
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For a CPU with 4 cores, 8 threads, 8mb cache and a speed of 3.5ghz, that is a extremely bad result.
Try getting a better Android emulator and update Antutu benchmark to at least v3.0
Source: http://ark.intel.com/m/products/65523

[Q] Memory RAM problem?

Hi guys, first of all thanks for the work from all of you.
I bought recently a LG P920 and installed ICS using some tutorials from XDA users/developers. Sometimes I feel that the phone is not responding as I want and it should.
Today I installed Android System Info from Play Store and at memory I get the information that the total memory is 410MB... It should be 512MB, right?
I attach a screenshot for all of you see.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P920 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

Mine is the same. Probably some ram is reserved for the os.

To have a responsive phone, do this:
1. Use 2D GPU rendering.
2. Use swap (you are using it by default).
3. Use the V6 Supercharger script (google it).
4. If you overclocked your processor lower the frequency as it tends to get slow and unstable on higher frequencies.

Can you explain more..please? And how to use swap..v6 supercharger...please please i'm so intereseted. I'm in V6 Experia Rom by optimusRs. Thank you.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda app-developers app

V6 is in android dev/hacks section. Just read the directions. The scripts are good about telling you if you need to do anything first.
I am not familiar with swap

410 MB is system-issued memory from the CPU driver inside kernel and what's little left get assigned to GPU - if you are familiar with nForce chipsets, they work the same way.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda premium

But LG say's that the phone has 512MB RAM... If we have ony 410MB, LG is cheating us.
Sent from my LG-P920 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

Dr. Mario said:
410 MB is system-issued memory from the CPU driver inside kernel and what's little left get assigned to GPU - if you are familiar with nForce chipsets, they work the same way.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but the chipset is not Nvidia.

I know. Still, it work the similar way - the 512MB is halved for separate processors; 410 MB for system and other left for GPU - 512MB DDR-II is what's soldered atop the CPU.
EDIT: If you have done any of PC modding or DIY build, you would know what IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) is, it takes a bit of main RAM (very few IGPs have their own RAM memory), and what you are seeing on your phone is the same thing you would expect from PC with IGP enabled. BTW, IGP sucks, so I personally disabled it and used separated VPU (AMD Radeon HD4670 video card), so I can have back precious bandwidth.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda premium

guitovski said:
Hi guys, first of all thanks for the work from all of you.
I bought recently a LG P920 and installed ICS using some tutorials from XDA users/developers. Sometimes I feel that the phone is not responding as I want and it should.
Today I installed Android System Info from Play Store and at memory I get the information that the total memory is 410MB... It should be 512MB, right?
I attach a screenshot for all of you see.
View attachment 1982749
Sent from my LG-P920 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can use this app ...it's amazing!! try it and report ..??
i'm satisfy with it and i don't use task manager.
it's more than app it's a magic for LG p920
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.oasisfeng.greenify&hl=fr