So, its just too hard to find and compare different benchmark results of different devices. There should be one thread to collect them. Posts your results here, with device name, revision, ROM version, clock speed and other stuff needed
These are welcomed but not exhaustive list of current benches:
3DMark by Futuremark Oy
Basemark X by Rightware
Epic Citadel
Mobile GPU Mark
Relative benchmark
GLBenchmark 3D benchmark
GFXBench 3.0 3D Manhattan
Antutu v3
CF-Bench
PassMark PerformanceTest
Vellamo Mobile Benchmark
Androbench
Browsermark browser test
Peacekeeper browser test
Octane js benchmark
Kraken js benchmark
Sunspider js benchmark
V8 js benchmark
Why not start it off with a good old single core?
This is my Xperia arc s, which has a single core processor @ 1.4ghz over clocked to 1.6ghz, Adreno 205 graphics and 512mb Ram.
It is running the rom Racing Bean by yours truly (not published to its own thread yet). This is a Cm10 based rom with loads of tweaks and features etc. Its kernel is Arc Fusion V4.0.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It beats some dual core devices
Yeah you know, no big deal. Phone and setup is in my sig.
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Boring. Guys, I mean there's already billion antutu+quadrant threads, we need more "real life" bench results, like peacekeeper, kraken, browser stuff, and 3D GPU comparing. antutu is not very relevant to everyday's activities, imho, it's just too synthetic like linpack etc
Ok, how about this?
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz. Jedi X 8 and Note2core kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
tmb993 said:
Ok, how about this?
Galaxy Note 2 on 4.2.1. Quadcore OC'd to 1.8 ghz. Jedi X 8 and Note2core kernel.
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its funny to think that the iPhone 5 gets 1600.
Apple: "Technology that's years ahead".
Haha this is true. And the new iPad 4 only reaches about 1750. Exynos kicks arse!
Sent from my SGH-I317 using xda premium
Epic Citadel 42fps
Adreno 225 android 4.1.2 LG-F160
Htc one X 4.1.1 stock not rooted
Sent from my HTC One X
Android x86 4.0 ICS on my 15.6 inch non-touchscreen 1.5 inch thick asus "tablet". (intel core i5 2450m Sandy Bridge)
Antutu
Nexus 10 benchmarks (STOCK):
Epic Citadel
50.5fps on High quality
Sunspider
tcb4 said:
Android x86 4.0 ICS on my 15.6 inch non-touchscreen 1.5 inch thick asus "tablet". (intel core i5 2450m Sandy Bridge)
Antutu
Nexus 10 benchmarks (STOCK):
Epic Citadel
50.5fps on High quality
Sunspider
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow those benchs r no doubt of an i5
sent from an Galaxy s3 GT I9300
Running perseus kernel 6 , XELLA 4.1.2 leaked build
forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1784401
Dont click,you might regret , I won't be responsible if you brick ur head
Just got my new Xiaomi MI2
http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_2-4928.php
I immediately run antutu to verfy if I got the real device, not the fake knock-offs.
These are the results from factory miui rom without tweaks.
very satisfied with this phone right now.
What is a 2ghz note 2 doing there
sent fromXperia sT21i
Everything stock
He probably got it up to 2 ghz and it was stable enough to just run one benchmark before it crashed and started bootlooping lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using xda premium
Good old galaxy s 1 android 4.2.1 keep in mind its running a live wallpaper and loaded down with widgets lol The benchmark says it crap but user experience is truly awesome no lag
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
Ak kernel , cm 10.1 nightly on my gnex , wish I could've broke 10k but ehhh...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
Huawei Vision. Single core and adreno 205. Clocked to 1,5Ghz with IceColdSandwich ROM + thunderbolt
Billy Madison said:
So, its just too hard to find and compare different benchmark results of different devices. There should be one thread to collect them. Posts your results here, with device name, revision, ROM version, clock speed and other stuff needed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eee PC image of Android-x86 ICS 4.0.4
VMware Player 5.0.1
Homebuilt i7-3770K stock speeds
-- Play3r
play3r said:
Eee PC image of Android-x86 ICS 4.0.4
VMware Player 5.0.1
Homebuilt i7-3770K stock speeds
-- Play3r
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For a CPU with 4 cores, 8 threads, 8mb cache and a speed of 3.5ghz, that is a extremely bad result.
Try getting a better Android emulator and update Antutu benchmark to at least v3.0
Source: http://ark.intel.com/m/products/65523
Related
Hey I come from the evo forums and since there was a lot of speculation about nexus s coming to sprint, I was wondering how much you can oc that to
Thanks
A drop of Chuck Norris's semen was placed on Android OS. We now have CyanogenMod.
1.4Ghz as far as I know
mine is at 1.4 but i never use it that fast but at 1.4 my quadrant score was 3254 if that matters to you though
Crossrocker said:
Hey I come from the evo forums and since there was a lot of speculation about nexus s coming to sprint, I was wondering how much you can oc that to
Thanks
A drop of Chuck Norris's semen was placed on Android OS. We now have CyanogenMod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
most phones can oc to 1.4ghz, many can oc to 1.5ghz, some can oc to 1.6ghz, and a few special phones to 1.7ghz. i can oc to 1.6ghz and run it as a daily driver stably, and can hit 1.7ghz unstably.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
simms22 said:
most phones can oc to 1.4ghz, many can oc to 1.5ghz, some can oc to 1.6ghz, and a few special phones to 1.7ghz. i can oc to 1.6ghz and run it as a daily driver stably, and can hit 1.7ghz unstably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good. Thanks!
A drop of Chuck Norris's semen was placed on Android OS. We now have CyanogenMod.
simms22 said:
most phones can oc to 1.4ghz, many can oc to 1.5ghz, some can oc to 1.6ghz, and a few special phones to 1.7ghz. i can oc to 1.6ghz and run it as a daily driver stably, and can hit 1.7ghz unstably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can do 1.6 fine save for one kernel aand I can get 1.7 to boot lol
Sent from my MattedBlues CM7 Nexus S from the XDA Premium app.
simms22 said:
most phones can oc to 1.4ghz, many can oc to 1.5ghz, some can oc to 1.6ghz, and a few special phones to 1.7ghz. i can oc to 1.6ghz and run it as a daily driver stably, and can hit 1.7ghz unstably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.6 ran stablest for me on the bionic's rom.
800MHZ lol
Here we go again, well I can OC to 2ghz and I have a quadrant of 4k+, does that help? Lol
JD
Sent from my Google Magic Wand
Even if these speeds can be run with stability, what are the longer term implications for reliability?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
phillevy said:
Even if these speeds can be run with stability, what are the longer term implications for reliability?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The higher the OC the shorter the processor life, that is the general formula. But in terms of longevity, you should get many years OC'ing without problems.. You will know your individual processor breaking point because your scrolling will slow, and you will get reboots... Just install CM and cruise at 1.3ghz and you should be safe
JD
I can only run to 1.3 GHz stable, but there isn't any long term implications that I know of. My Nexus One was overclocked for months and never suffered any ill effects so I suspect the Nexus S will fair well or even better than that phone.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
tkgod said:
I can only run to 1.3 GHz stable, but there isn't any long term implications that I know of. My Nexus One was overclocked for months and never suffered any ill effects so I suspect the Nexus S will fair well or even better than that phone.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is implications for any OC, but they will probably will not be felt in the short to mid term. OC damage can take years, but can also hit you in the short term if you OC to dangerous levels
JD
Here i oc to 1.2 but can run till 1.3 stable.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Not my work just fyo
It's awesome. I just turned 2532 on quadrant
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
jonathanphx1 said:
Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post this kind of stuff in general, if ur not releasing something. This crap clogs up the forums . Save this stuff for twitter.
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Jaywan said:
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the free section of the free Rom Manager app.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Jaywan said:
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
babybacon said:
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is so true. I underclocked my phone to 768MHz to try out how it would work for a day. I ended up entirely forgetting I had done that until I ran a benchmark.
seeing all this is amazing, I am very tempted to try it out, but this beast is super fast with having to OC it, lol
destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you're right or not but I just flashed the 1.5 kernel and at 1.4 this thing is as fast as a computer..I hope you're right because I don't wanna go back to 1ghz..
Got 2016 quadrant after a reboot which is 300 higher than I got at 1 gig..
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/specs
Right below the dual core, High performance Smart Phones section. MSM8655 is our processor, it comes @ 1.0ghz, plam pre3 has the same and it comes @ 1.4ghz. The chip can take it but I think it was lowered for battery concern. I notice a lot of speed just flying through different programs when OC to 1.5, it opens them much faster, could be the I/O tweaks as well though. As for PC, mine puts out 42 gflops compared to my phones 49 mflops, still a long way off, thats 0.001% of the processing power. This phone is no slouch, so I guess it speaks more for my computers power.
sweet....im just gonna run it at 1.4 and since i have the 2750 battery i'm not gonna worry about battery life at all. i love this phone right now..
babybacon said:
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is the 1.8ghz kernel can someone post or pm me the link to it...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Pulled 2310 on quadrant.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
this thing is ridiculous at 1.5 I cant wait to see 2+
battery life at 1.5 seems at least the same if not better than at 1.0
Had the same CPU on my inspire - 1.6 was basically the highest I could take it without crashing.
OP will we can u make one for 2.3.3 sense so I can port this Rom also a asop 2.2 kernel for my liquidmetal plz..
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
About
CF-Bench is (mainly) CPU and memory benchmark tool specifically designed to be able to handle multi-core devices, produce a fairly stable score, and test both native as well managed code performance.
It tests specific device properties you do not regularly see tested by other benchmarks, and runs in a set timeframe.
It does produce some "final" scores, but as with every benchmark, you should take those with a grain of salt. It is simply not theoretically possible to produce a single number that accurately describes a device's performance.
Why ?
I know, there are lots of other benchmarks. But they don't give me the numbers I'm personally interested in comparing. Few really support multi-core or test both native and Java code. This benchmark is also supposed to give a more "stable" score compared to some others.
Current scores
Here are a number of scores reached by tested devices:
Samsung Galaxy S2 @ 2x1200 - 6498
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v @ 2x1000 - 5188
HTC Sensation @ 2x1188 - 5174
Motorola Atrix @ 2x1000 - 5136
HTC Thunderbolt @ 1920 - 4663
Motorola Droid X @ 1200 - 2792
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7" @ 1000 - 2401
Samsung Galaxy S @ 1000 - 2205
HTC HD2 @ 1536 - 2041
Samsung Apollo @ 667 - 488
HTC Hero @ 748 - 359
HTC Dream (G1) @ 528 - 191
Of course, you should really keep in mind that the three different scores listed at the bottom of the app are pretty meaningless
Download
Market link (mobile): market://details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
Market link (desktop): https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
-- reserved --
-- also reserved --
Will happily start low end scores
Update:
HTC Legend @767 906
Fyi it regersters the max kernel clockspeed not the actual
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
50-3 said:
Will happily start low end scores
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry, I got the high end captivate at 1.7 Ghz
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3045 I forgot it was dual processor capable.
Chainfire said:
Well, with the previous version of the benchmark the highscore was held by a seriously overclocked EeePad... The score was around 8500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should see if any Nexus s 4g users running trinity Kernal can run it for you as there getting ridiculous scores on quadrant
Sent from my Legend using XDA Premium App
HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Sent from my ThunderBolt using Tapatalk
hijackerjack said:
HTC Thunderbolt @1x1920 - 4663
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dang, that is by far the highest single-core score I've seen!
Gonna try this out, will post back with score
Samsung Galaxy S 2 - 5957.
SGS II 6346 - Running in the middle of my day. not setup for a benchmark run...
Galaxy S Vibrant: I got a 2211 on it.
I wished it incorporated GPU power into the score as well
2478 with my Nexus S, 5276 with my Xoom.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
SGS2 @ 1300Mhz - 7200+ (I accidentally closed and can't remember the number, but it was like 7213. I'm running it again )
5055 on Atrix.
6877 - T-mobile LG G2x
6479 without tweaks Stock-Rom
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
With my OC SGS II @1400 Mhz i have 7383.
HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 998Mhz -2586
HD2 Miui 1.6.17 @ 1190Mhz -3078
Hello,
not that those numbers matter so much but just out of curiosity why the new samsung with the same chipset as the o2x scores so much higher in Quadrant?
Is it because of the 1GB of RAM?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
-sandro- said:
Hello,
not that those numbers matter so much but just out of curiosity why the new samsung with the same chipset as the o2x scores so much higher in Quadrant?
Is it because of the 1GB of RAM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
benchmark pi i got around 505-600, so, i can't say those number is correct, quadrant benchmark?? i can't say a word about it, it ahead galaxy s2? it's really strange
i get 3400-3500 in quadrant at 1 ghz, so it not so strange. samsung just make better software.
It has 2.6.37 kernel.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
smokeweedevery said:
i get 3700-3800 in quadrant at 1 ghz, so it not so strange. samsung just make better software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, what phone?
I get 2600-2800 with cm 127 nigthly :|
optimus 2x on cm7 and vorkkernel, i get 3400-3500 at 1ghz.
I get 3000 Points with stock rom and NeoBlaze, with the stock kernel I get 2700.
Yea with lots of tweaks lol. But the galaxy r is on stock.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk
smokeweedevery said:
optimus 2x on cm7 and vorkkernel, i get 3400-3500 at 1ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
isn't the kernel that comes with cm7 nightly at 1ghz too?
better kernal...more ram and gingerbread tweaks....i really dont know but it uses a slightly updated gpu shader speed...(update i checked but it uses same hardware except ram of o2x....no shader speed change...remains same 300mhz....)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpC58PwVFLo&feature=player_embedded
I've never seen my LG so fast...
We really need better software.
tomasiqu said:
I've never seen my LG so fast...
We really need better software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.6.36 Or above kernel
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Some necroposting...but it has 600 mhz...
i may be corrected but i think the galaxy r has uses EXT 4, while our o2x uses EXT 3 when referenced as stock, giving the o2x a considerably lesser score in quadrant
quadrant is outdated and no use for newer phones, those scores mean nothing as far as im aware quadrant STILL does not properly support dual core devices.
Try cf-bench, made by the creator of chainfire3d, try at standard clock speed then try cloakk the cpu to match that of the sgs2 and you will see that the tegra 2 device out performs its rivals in many areas when the over clock is matched. and sometimes even when is lower.
really sick of seeing quadrant its such a crap app.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
eraldo said:
quadrant is outdated and no use for newer phones, those scores mean nothing as far as im aware quadrant STILL does not properly support dual core devices.
Try cf-bench, made by the creator of chainfire3d, try at standard clock speed then try cloakk the cpu to match that of the sgs2 and you will see that the tegra 2 device out performs its rivals in many areas when the over clock is matched. and sometimes even when is lower.
really sick of seeing quadrant its such a crap app.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my Signature says it all, its only at 1.4 overclock as well. good effort on O2X's half (;
Supupa said:
my Signature says it all, its only at 1.4 overclock as well. good effort on O2X's half (;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep same, just shows how totaly off quadrant is, antutu benchmark is also up to date.
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA Premium App
I did some comparison with my sisters htc sensation (1.2ghz dualcore) and my 2x both on stock rom and with quadrant htc got 2200-2350 lg got 2600-2750
Antutu benchmark htc 4600-4750
and lg 4850-4990.is 2x really better than htc sensation?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
luka2858 said:
I did some comparison with my sisters htc sensation (1.2ghz dualcore) and my 2x both on stock rom and with quadrant htc got 2200-2350 lg got 2600-2750
Antutu benchmark htc 4600-4750
and lg 4850-4990.is 2x really better than htc sensation?
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but the stock rom is crap, and if the o2x tegra 2 chip was released overclocked like the sgs2 was then the o2x would get better stats, the sgs2 gpu is good but the tegra gpu is way better with 3d stuff and that's whats important as we get into more advanced games.
I take it you have not rooted or installed any custom roms so i suggest you do, it will open up your phone to better things and increase performance by 100% compared to that crappy stock rom.
So , I was a little bored and decided to make a game, Among all of you, Who has the most liw quality phone? BTW, To make oit harder, It should be your main phone.
Sent from my LG-P350 using xda app-developers app
Lol funny contest
My main phone is the Motorola Flipside. 720 mhz processor, 512 mb RAM, 3.1 inch HVGA (320x480px) screen. And it has a giant next to useless trackpad.
I actually got that used recently, my main phone up until I got the flipside about 2 weeks ago was the CLIQ. First ever motorola android phone, and it has the second lowest specs on a phone to date. 528 mhz processor, 256 mb RAM. I think the only phone lower than it is the G1 and MT3G (which have the same internals). Mind you, despite it being a 528 mhz (only 72 less than the optimus one series, og droid) it was a total piece of junk! Even overclocked to 750 mhz it lagged on angry birds. Gotta get some bonus points for living with that until just a couple weeks ago....
Sent from my MB508 using xda premium
Zte Blade
600 MHz processor. 512 MB ram.
But it has ICS
-_-
I'm on a og Droid now. Oc to 1000mhz. It ain't worse than the first smartphone I had
The Samsung transform damn near switched to iPhone after that rascal!!!
Sent from my Droid using xda premium
This is for my kids they have the
ZTE X500 They love that phone.
It's there second ANDROID smartphone.
They had a HTC G1 before that.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I think I win in this competition if you ask me.
500 MHz processor
384MB of RAM
No GPU
QVGA
120 DPI
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
I once had a 400 mhz phone that could make calls !! I paid 100 euros for it super stupid...
Sent from my GT-S6500D using xda premium
Herkey said:
definitely i win this game.
208MHz processor + built-in 19.5MB memory = my 2 sim 2 standby phone . :crying: this is what my phone looks like , boutght from TD a while back
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started laughing when. I seen the pic..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Herkey said:
definitely i win this game.
208MHz processor + built-in 19.5MB memory = my 2 sim 2 standby phone . :crying: this is what my phone looks like , boutght from TD a while back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What phone is that and what OS is it running???
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
I either use my g1 with android 1.0 and faulty hardware or my old Nokia. From 1990. Like the one that can smash through walls. Beat dat
Sent from my chicken using xda app-developers app
I can't play this game, I'm certain to be the loser thus far -assuming the judging criteria and winner is based on "lowest" performing phone!
Motorola ATRIX™ 2 MB865
TI OMAP 4430 Processor
qHD (960 x 540), non-PenTile
1 GB DDR Ram / 32 GB external storage
Overclocked to 1.25GHz
Underclocked to 220MHz
GPU Overclock to 440MHz
Net speed tweaks
Ram Speed tweaks
Hotweiss' Radio Mod
Sent from my Atari Falcon030
Software/support wise I think I have a winner.
The g2x.
Dual core tegra2 1ghz
512mb of ram (weak)
Released only a year ago with no support past 2.3.4.... hardware wise it isn't bad but after promised a pentaband super phone here I am a year later with 2g and gingerbread.
Pin it to Win it.