Hey guys, could someone please explain to me why my Nexus S (2.3.3) is only getting an avg score of 12 mflops while my N1 (2.3.3) is getting an avg score of 37 mflops on the Linpack app?
Because benchmarking does not equal real world performance.
Quillcomm Snapdragon processors have better performance when it comes to this particular test.
Hummingbird will excel in other specific benchmark tests.
Run a test with any 3D game or HD, if it lags, then its the device, if it runs smooth, then is the benchmark app itself that hasn't been updated to read scores due to our ota, I had the same thought and issue with quadrant but then I installed modern combat and pes11(soccer game) and both run smoothly, try smartbench 2010 its free on the market and updated for our phones.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Cool that's good to know. I'll try 3D games and compare. Thanks for the feedback.
lynkx said:
Hey guys, could someone please explain to me why my Nexus S (2.3.3) is only getting an avg score of 12 mflops while my N1 (2.3.3) is getting an avg score of 37 mflops on the Linpack app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
linpack is made for the snapdragon processors. my overclocked nexus s gets around 23 on linpack. but, lets see one of those snapdragons do this on quadrant, or get 63 fps on nenamark, or get a 37000+ on an3Dbench...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That's a nice score. Well I just d/l Smartbench 2011. My NS got around 850 while N1 got 970, both are estimates. But I did notice that on the corridor test the NS ran it super quick while N1 was sluggish.
Benchmarks depend on what you do to your phone, from a custom rom to an overclocked kernel and other tweaks, such a lagfix do the trick, it looks awesome to hit those numbers but the device cannot be stable 24/7, not for a daily use.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Related
Hey everybody I'd like to start a thread to show off your T-Bolt Quadrant Scores. I'm using Drod's 1.8 Ghz kernel, and I'm hitting 2500+ consistantly. This phone is wicked fast, and I see it only getting better. So everyone, if you will, follow suit....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
OP, please move this to general since the topic does not have anything to do with dev work. thanks
This does need to be moved.
Tbolt - VirusRom_rc1b1-drod1.8
ghz
What app are you using for the scores? Thx in advance.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
How do you guys get so high quadrant scores? I get consistently under 2000.
das bamf 1.2 @ 1804/537, performance governor...
Running BAMF 1.3.2 oc 1.2
[URL="http://a.
frnt242 said:
What app are you using for the scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant standard..
Virus ROM - drod's 1.8 kernel.
sent via r00t3d TB - thx jcase!
not that it matters... lol
CPCookieMan said:
How do you guys get so high quadrant scores? I get consistently under 2000.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocked kernals
Tbolt - VirusRom_rc1b2-drod1.8ghz
hey imnever, which app are you using there?
That's Quadrant Advanced. Basically same as standard, lil more detail and no adds.
Tbolt - VirusRom_rc1b2-drod1.8ghz
thanks..i wondered why they called it standard...i dont know if its my rom or imoseyon's tweaks, but i dont have ads so i never put that together.
How's the battery life with that 1.8 rom?
Just threw on the 1.8 kernel for ****s and giggles BLAZIN
Drod 1.8ghz kernel with Chingy's Rom:
Does this mean i win at the quadrant game?
adrynalyne said:
Does this mean i win at the quadrant game?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Leave it to Adryn to come and destroy shi*. How the hell did you pull a 3k?
I am luck to even get half that...
My score is 2400.. The only phone ive seen higher is the Atrix 4G..
Let me know your scores on the G2x!!
Highest score I've gotten is 2732, although the highest one i have a screenshot of is 2724. I posted it in the lg g2x benchmark thread a while ago.
EDIT: just ran it on the leaked gingerbread rom and got 2805
I dunno much about benchmarking android devices, I assume it's like running one on a PC where you really want to do it with a clean install and nothing unnecessary running. If that's the case, then my phone ought to be able to do much better than this.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
earlier today on my 3rd or 4th run.
The g2x would get a much much better score in quadrant if it didn't score so low in the 2d test. It seems to score the same in the 2d test as most single core devices at around 19fps. If you look at the individual test part scores you can see that the difference in the g2x score and the sgsII score is about the difference in the 2D test score.
I can get over 2800 with EagleBlood 1.03 Gingerbread. I turn on Airplane mode, turn off auto sync, and turn on wi-fi, and get over 2800 easily.
G2x at 1.3 GHz, using quad std you can.t see the tint I/O score compared to my higher scoring NS. Any other quad i will thus post from quad adv.
I/O really kills the avg at ~1400 vs ~4500
http://www.jpct.de/an3dbenchxl/show.php?code=MjYyNzQx163391&page=0
that's a nice benchmark too
stock-stock rom....
I am getting anywhere from 2300 to 2500 when I run quadrant on my G2x.
Got a 2921 out of mine. Pretty good!
This is one of the lowest I've experienced, but who counts quadrant scores? How about smartbench 2011 for our type of phones?? Neocore scores too. Power!!
While I was installing all my apps, no less.
-bZj
EaglesBlood 1.03
EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's kernel. But benchmarks are worthless. That being said I still like high numbers so here it is.
I'm not allowed to post outside links, but my highest is 2573. Liking the numbers coming from the EagleBlood rom though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Mine is EaglesBlood 1.03 with Morfic's OC kernel.
I've only ran Quadrant Advanced twice and my highest score was 2700...
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Okay got a new record on my stock rooted rom.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
EagleBlood 1.03 + Morfic OC/UV kernel
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
tmdz28 said:
I am only getting 2057. What is happening here!!
Totally stock, i dont even know how to root. :lol:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1060715
There you go pal.
Btw, where can i find morfic's kernel..? I see 2 kernel's in the Dev forum but none from Morfic.
So the new quadrant app is actually somewhat useful. It breaks down the score by category.
Here is what I got the first time I ran it:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is on eclipse 1.3 with pbj kernel and max frequency at 800mhz and conservative governor.
Obviously i have a low cpu score, but somehow i have a massive lead in i/o over nexus s and gnex but not the tab. Do they still use rfs or something? Also everything has a substantial lead in 2d/3d over the gnex, which is strange considering they all have the same gpu and the gnex is clocked faster.
Sent from my pocket-sized, Linux-based computer using electromagnetic radiation... and Tapatalk.
JihadSquad said:
So the new quadrant app is actually somewhat useful. It breaks down the score by category.
Here is what I got the first time I ran it:
This is on eclipse 1.3 with pbj kernel and max frequency at 800mhz and conservative governor.
Obviously i have a low cpu score, but somehow i have a massive lead in i/o over nexus s and gnex but not the tab. Do they still use rfs or something? Also everything has a substantial lead in 2d/3d over the gnex, which is strange considering they all have the same gpu and the gnex is clocked faster.
Sent from my pocket-sized, Linux-based computer using electromagnetic radiation... and Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There must be a glitch, or they are not showing the right scores for the other devices. I got scores in the 2100's, better than the galaxy nexus!
Eclipse 1.2 ROM
KAK & Supercharged!
anyone notice the test takes a lot longer now?
bvsbutthd101 said:
anyone notice the test takes a lot longer now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah probably because the test is meant for new phones with 1ghz single core/higher speed dual core processors, not like OG Droid and HTC Hero.
Transformer prime gets around 4000, yikes
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
I've always found AnTuTu to be a better benchmark. It didn't suffer the seemingly random variability that Quadrant suffered. I'll have to check out the new version of Quadrant to see how it is.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Who thinks they can beat my quadrant score with there Droid charge? Lol. And the only reason I'm posting this here is because I don't have ten post yet.. lol
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
I remember the days when I thought quadrant meant something. But barely...
There... I helped you get your ten posts
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
hahahha
it doesnt mean alot... but it does give you an idea of your phones round-a-bout preformance.... for sure..
Like this?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/7018342383/
That was easy. If I'd actually tried, I could have easily broken 2500. That's not a brag...it's more of a commentary on how useless Quadrant is as a performance measure.
Seriously. Quadrant is completely pointless. The number have no bearing on reality. That I/O number in particular is inflated to stupid levels because of the way that Quadrant tests I/O. In Quadrant, the difference between rfs and ext4 is in the hundreds. In the real world, the differences between the two are imperceptible.
Quadrant is the Android equivalent of a penis measuring contest.
SENT FROM THE DOG POUND
stebomurkn420 said:
it doesnt mean alot... but it does give you an idea of your phones round-a-bout preformance.... for sure..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd argue that too. My original Galaxy Tab running the European GB release scores about 1000 in quadrant. My Charge scores as you saw above. From a user perception, there is virtually no difference between the two. In fact, the Tab edges out the Charge at some things.
I'll say it again. Quadrant is meaningless. Antutu is better. It's still artificial, but the two devices score within 100 of each other on Antutu...that is much more in line with reality.
shrike1978 said:
I'll say it again. Quadrant is meaningless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. It's beyond meaningless. I remember on my Droid2, if I enabled stagefright, I would gain 1200 points on my Quadrant score. It can be faked/cheated too many ways to be useful.
fffuuuuuuckkk...
i am a noob... wat can i say.... hahaha... look like i got some wrk to do...
Ive landed a 3100 a couple times at 1.4
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA
What ROM\Kernel are you using?
... and yes I am reply so that I can get my 10 posts........
I did a full benchmark on my cappy and this where my scores..was just curious about them and decided to post them here since im on stock 2.3.5 with CWM v4.0.1.5 kernel I installed the kernel to install costum roms but havent install none yet & got these scores...Can i do a backup on my stock rom?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You have too many questions. Pls read stickies in each section.
I have 1700 in Quadrant2 with ICS and Icy Glitch.
quadrant = lol
bravomail said:
You have too many questions. Pls read stickies in each section.
I have 1700 in Quadrant2 with ICS and Icy Glitch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too many questions? are u serious? can u even read? i see one question -_-
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Just to save you from posts about Quadrant scores, I'll say that in general, quadrant scores aren't a solid indicator of phone performance. There are so many factors that can be artificially tweaked that it's not reliable. If you're really interested, there are posts floating around on XDA that go into more detail about this issue.
The biggest factor is how your phone feels to you - if it's snappy and blazing fast in all apps you run, that's infinitely better than a high Quadrant score.
jmtheiss said:
Just to save you from posts about Quadrant scores, I'll say that in general, quadrant scores aren't a solid indicator of phone performance. There are so many factors that can be artificially tweaked that it's not reliable. If you're really interested, there are posts floating around on XDA that go into more detail about this issue.
The biggest factor is how your phone feels to you - if it's snappy and blazing fast in all apps you run, that's infinitely better than a high Quadrant score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! thats the answer i was looking for since i actually find my phone somewat laggy with stock but had this score which i didnt knew to trust
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5