[Q] Undervolting/Min Frequency - AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727

Okay so here is my question and please dont flame me but i am really interested in finding an answer and google has not helped Okay so if you have undervolted the following frequecies (192, 310, 384, 432, 486, and 540) all to 800mV then technically are they all consuming the same amount of power? And if this is true would it be better to make the min frequency 540MHz because this is using the same voltages as the 192MHz speed and it would get the job done faster because of the higher clock speed? Any help or input on the subject would be great

uhh, I don't think those voltages are actually holding. 540 mhz @ 800 mV isn't possible by ppl. Use command terminal emulator and check actual vdd table
as for the rest, 540 mhz will still use more power than 192, even at the same core voltage

A little guidance couldn't hurt please
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk

ckck543 said:
A little guidance couldn't hurt please
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what does this mean lol? Restate if u have another question and I'll happily assist

The last time I was playing with a frequency generator, It was determined that increasing the frequency had a direct effect on voltage.
When the voltage was adjusted back to original value, the current jumped. Sufficient to say that no matter what, the overall power consumption increased with the frequency.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

How exactly would I use a terminal emu later to check my vdd table? Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk

ckck543 said:
How exactly would I use a terminal emu later to check my vdd table? Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get system tuner or faux clock app and just do it from gui if you can't find it. Otherwise read the kernel thread from faux, he's got it in there.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

812mv up to 486 works perfect

Okay thanks for the help guys if anybody could post their screen shots of their voltage tab in system tuner or whatever app they are using? Just for a reference for everyone else. Here is mine
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my cellular telephone

ckck543 said:
Okay thanks for the help guys if anybody could post their screen shots of their voltage tab in system tuner or whatever app they are using? Just for a reference for everyone else. Here is mine
Sent from my cellular telephone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone will have slightly different because the same undervolting values don't work for everyone.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

How would you suggest to test for the right voltage? Just trying to learn here so any help would be just dandy
Sent from my cellular telephone

ckck543 said:
How would you suggest to test for the right voltage? Just trying to learn here so any help would be just dandy
Sent from my cellular telephone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Drop it step by step and when it reboots or locks up you've gone too far. Haha
Sent from SKYROCKET
NexusMod 4.0
Romracer 0.3

Aha that sounds like a great plan !
Sent from my cellular telephone

ckck543 said:
Aha that sounds like a great plan !
Sent from my cellular telephone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The safe spot is usually between -50 to -75. Some can get away with -100mv

xcrazydx said:
The safe spot is usually between -50 to -75. Some can get away with -100mv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm one of the lucky ones with -100 hehe
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

kr3w1337 said:
I'm one of the lucky ones with -100 hehe
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, but only at lowee frequencies

how much improvement in battery life is everyone seeing from underclocking?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium

depends, but for me franky, a *&$-load lol

icenight89 said:
yeah, but only at lowee frequencies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it's global so nope, not just low frequencies.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

if ur using fauxclocm with faux's kernel how high are u OC'd. Not that it really matters, because if u look at the vdd table he procides he set the mV values for anything I would say above 1544 rather safely, so even if u are -100mV its not much of an accomplishment.

Related

Tegrak overclock app?

Anyone else use this app to overclock? Im bored at work and instead of working I just installed it and ran quadrant, which I know that's all its really good for, and hit over 1900 at 1.3 ghz. Im gonna leave it there for a bit to see if anything goes wrong...
Edit: eats battery like buttery salty movie theatre popcorn!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
droidzach said:
Anyone else use this app to overclock? Im bored at work and instead of working I just installed it and ran quadrant, which I know that's all its really good for, and hit over 1900 at 1.3 ghz. Im gonna leave it there for a bit to see if anything goes wrong...
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand why anyone wants to overclock our phones? From everything I have read all it will do is decrease battery life and give higher quad scores which really mean nothing.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
i think whats more important, or more NEEDED, is voltage control.
be it voltage control for OC'ing or Voltage Control for underclocking, or just dropping the voltages as low as you can go while maintaning the stock phone speeds.
this is one thing i miss about the EVO.
akellar said:
I don't understand why anyone wants to overclock our phones? From everything I have read all it will do is decrease battery life and give higher quad scores which really mean nothing.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because its fun. Of course there is no practical value in it I even said that. I personally just like to mess with my phone to mess with it and I'm sure others do too. does a theme make your phone run better or more efficiently are they important to practicality? No it just changes its looks so why do people do that? It's fun.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
I mean...there's plenty of practical reasons to overclock, e.g. better performance in a game. But if you're sitting around playing a game for a while, I doubt your concern is battery life to begin with.
tegrak uses module overlock similar to how the dx/d2/milestone are able to oc/uv without the ability to accept custom kernels
its not ideal (for those that overclock) compared to actual custom kernels with oc steps.
that being said, overclock isnt particularly important on 1ghz and up processors..whereas the eris/og droid needed it to compensate
I am using it, overclocked to 1.3 and then using setcpu to keep it at 800. I just want to have the speed and power there if needed
edit: just got a 1719 score in quadrant on 1.3
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
sageDieu said:
I am using it, overclocked to 1.3 and then using setcpu to keep it at 800. I just want to have the speed and power there if needed
edit: just got a 1719 score in quadrant on 1.3
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im doing the same, also with a profile to cap off cpu at 400 performance scaled (seems the screen sometimes doesn't want to turn on if scaled to conservative) when screen is off. I've been noticing that full charges last at least a whole day and a half with my average use
Sent from my SCH-I500
Now that there are UV OC kernels available, why even use this?
phidelt82 said:
Now that there are UV OC kernels available, why even use this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I thought those were fascinate kernels only....hm, goes to show how much I know.
Sent from my SCH-I500
I'm on Eclair rooted w/ Voodoo and regularly pull 1800+ Quadrant scores and get a solid 12hr. of battery life with screen brightness at around 60% (easily visible outside). I have no idea why anyone would want to use an OC tool... other than to have than extra bit of control that would allow you to undervolt even further for additional battery life.
EDIT-
To:Zach - I'm calling your boss to tell them that you're off-task and that they should make you quit the OC'ing and get back to work ASAP.
To:Zach's Mez... you're welcome!
monthlymixcd said:
I'm on Eclair rooted w/ Voodoo and regularly pull 1800+ Quadrant scores and get a solid 12hr. of battery life with screen brightness at around 60% (easily visible outside). I have no idea why anyone would want to use an OC tool... other than to have than extra bit of control that would allow you to undervolt even further for additional battery life.
EDIT-
To:Zach - I'm calling your boss to tell them that you're off-task and that they should make you quit the OC'ing and get back to work ASAP.
To:Zach's Mez... you're welcome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha he has a Verizon iPhoney and he would be like "what is all that android awesomeness? OCing and UVing? wtf?" And his boss has a mez and asks me about it all the time!
and even better we have the best of both now:
phidelt82 said:
Now that there are UV OC kernels available, why even use this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question Just saw those today...Another good question is what you got up your sleeve? saw that screen shot you posted earlier you are one bad dude with one bad phone
...if anyone else wants to try em, check out Fascinate Development for EC10 kernals that are for Touchwiz. Be smart and watch what you are flashing.

Offically OC'ed to 1.5 ghz

Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Not my work just fyo
It's awesome. I just turned 2532 on quadrant
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
jonathanphx1 said:
Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post this kind of stuff in general, if ur not releasing something. This crap clogs up the forums . Save this stuff for twitter.
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Jaywan said:
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the free section of the free Rom Manager app.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Jaywan said:
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
babybacon said:
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is so true. I underclocked my phone to 768MHz to try out how it would work for a day. I ended up entirely forgetting I had done that until I ran a benchmark.
seeing all this is amazing, I am very tempted to try it out, but this beast is super fast with having to OC it, lol
destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you're right or not but I just flashed the 1.5 kernel and at 1.4 this thing is as fast as a computer..I hope you're right because I don't wanna go back to 1ghz..
Got 2016 quadrant after a reboot which is 300 higher than I got at 1 gig..
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/specs
Right below the dual core, High performance Smart Phones section. MSM8655 is our processor, it comes @ 1.0ghz, plam pre3 has the same and it comes @ 1.4ghz. The chip can take it but I think it was lowered for battery concern. I notice a lot of speed just flying through different programs when OC to 1.5, it opens them much faster, could be the I/O tweaks as well though. As for PC, mine puts out 42 gflops compared to my phones 49 mflops, still a long way off, thats 0.001% of the processing power. This phone is no slouch, so I guess it speaks more for my computers power.
sweet....im just gonna run it at 1.4 and since i have the 2750 battery i'm not gonna worry about battery life at all. i love this phone right now..
babybacon said:
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is the 1.8ghz kernel can someone post or pm me the link to it...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Pulled 2310 on quadrant.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
this thing is ridiculous at 1.5 I cant wait to see 2+
battery life at 1.5 seems at least the same if not better than at 1.0
Had the same CPU on my inspire - 1.6 was basically the highest I could take it without crashing.
OP will we can u make one for 2.3.3 sense so I can port this Rom also a asop 2.2 kernel for my liquidmetal plz..
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App

Official ICS 1200mhz?

People have reported their CPUs clocked at 1200mhz after the update. Mines still at 1000. Is this correct? Thanks.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Mine is at 1200mhz.
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Thread Reopened
Well, I see how this is going, and yes, it got my attention.
Thread Cleaned and now Moved to Q&A
OP has a viable question. No need to toss in idiotic comments.
MD
Mine is 1200 mhz. What app is the OP using to tell the clock speed?
I'm using Android System Info from the market.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
which app to use to measure cpu frequency?
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
AnTuTu Benchmark and Android System Info.
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Yeah buddy, stock ICS leask #1. 1200!!! I've had 4 A2's and 2 out of 4 came equipped with 1200 stock ICS. I believe it's luck of the draw man. Don't sweat it, the other two were 1000 but was able to OC both at 1200 with no bootlooping issues. GL.
Sent From My Motorola Atrix 2 ICS Leaked 1.
Also at 1200.
I'm sure Moto didn't choose to put some A2's on 1200 and keep the others on 1000. The OTAs files pushed out to all the phones are identical. So what's causing these differences in clock speeds? Beats me
Look what mine says!
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
athani said:
I'm sure Moto didn't choose to put some A2's on 1200 and keep the others on 1000. The OTAs files pushed out to all the phones are identical. So what's causing these differences in clock speeds? Beats me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They may have, putting a check in place that queries the CPU's specific ID to find out what batch it's from. If it's from a good batch, 1200, if not, 1000. That's a POSSIBILITY.
Ajfink said:
They may have, putting a check in place that queries the CPU's specific ID to find out what batch it's from. If it's from a good batch, 1200, if not, 1000. That's a POSSIBILITY.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense.. I tried to OC this phone at one time and couldn't even get to 1100mhz without it freezing and doing stupid ****. I just thought I was doing something wrong. And I was so happy that I would finally be able to get to 1200mhz without having to do anything. I guess I just got the **** CPU....
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Ajfink said:
They may have, putting a check in place that queries the CPU's specific ID to find out what batch it's from. If it's from a good batch, 1200, if not, 1000. That's a POSSIBILITY.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possible. But I'm not convinced. If only some Devs could investigate.
athani said:
Possible. But I'm not convinced. If only some Devs could investigate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is really like to get an official answer, myself
Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk 2
Very interesting.... I wouldn't put it past Motorola to only overclock the "good" chips, nice quality assurance there Moto . First time I heard about this I just thought "Well okay, an overclock from GB stuck through to ICS, no big deal", but it's been confirmed that isn't the case. Strange how some are overclocked and some are not. A big company like Moto shouldn't have "good" batches and "bad" batches, if that is the case we will never get an official word on this, maybe it's a kind of soak test, trying the 1.2 over clock on certain phones only..... But I don't know.
athani said:
I'm sure Moto didn't choose to put some A2's on 1200 and keep the others on 1000. The OTAs files pushed out to all the phones are identical. So what's causing these differences in clock speeds? Beats me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it does something to check if your cpu is capable of being stable at the higher speed. Unfortunately, mine is still at 1000Mhz also. I was hoping for the higher speed but not so lucky.
Its not that simple of a check to determine if it can run...
- Mine bootlooped when OC'd to 1200 on 2.3.5
- Its 1200 on 4.0 fine
- Others had it OC'd to 1200 with no problem on 2.3.5
- They have it set by default to 1000 on ICS
I made a survey about this some time ago, but almost all of my theories went down the drain...
mine stayed at 1000mhz.:banghead:
Sent from my MB865 using ICS
What's the default voltage and governor for 1200MHz enabled devices?

KToonsez Kernel Settings

Thought it would would be nice to have a thread dedicated to KToonsez kernel settings and adjustments. This can be the place to share tips of what works best for you. To organize this a bit, list the following....
Is it built for speed, stability, or battery saving?
Min-max CPU freq.
CPU volts if you changed them.
Gov and settings.
Anything else you want to add??
FYI. Scrolling though alot of pictures all in one page on the web or the Vellamo HTML 5 benchmark is the best way to test stability IMO.
Also be careful of running your benchmarks at 2106mhz. They may increase the CPU temp higher than you think. I hit atleast 140 degrees Fahrenheit on the Elephant stress test!! I'm not sure what temp the CPU can really take before it destroys itself.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
Fairly smooth and quick.
Wheatley Gov + stock Gov settings.
96-2106
2106 @ 1325mv
96 @ 800mv
Touch Boost @ stock
This setup seems to keep the CPU from burning up and still puts out the power.
In the taskbar I am running Micro CPU Monitor, Temp Monitor(CPU), and Cool Tool APPS. All this is keeping good track of everything my CPU is doing regardless of what app I am currently using. Its all right there at the top of the screen. Load, Frequency, and Temp.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
What app are people using to adjust the settings. I could have sworn there was a KTweaks app but sure can't find it. Know it came with a ROM I was running.
its called ktweaker.
i put my minimum to 144 thats all i changed.
razz1 said:
Fairly smooth and quick.
Wheatley Gov + stock Gov settings.
96-2106
2106 @ 1325mv
96 @ 800mv
Touch Boost @ stock
This setup seems to keep the CPU from burning up and still puts out the power.
In the taskbar I am running Micro CPU Monitor, Temp Monitor(CPU), and Cool Tool APPS. All this is keeping good track of everything my CPU is doing regardless of what app I am currently using. Its all right there at the top of the screen. Load, Frequency, and Temp.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any wake lock issues?
Here are my settings
They are the best mixture of battery and performance that i could find
also stock voltage, and touch booster disabled
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent From My VZW GS3
Its great to see someone replying to this thread. I really thought it was going to go dead. Considering this is probably one of the most popular kernels I thought it would take off pretty good. Anyways thanks for your input and keep it coming!
Thanks guys!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Xparent Cyan Tapatalk 2
Wheatly Governor, SIO Scheduler, 1512 max 384 min, 384 screen off, touch booster is stock, voltage is stock, and i think thats it
Neverendingxsin said:
Wheatly Governor, SIO Scheduler, 1512 max 384 min, 384 screen off, touch booster is stock, voltage is stock, and i think thats it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats the battery life like??
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
jpeezy1986 said:
Whats the battery life like??
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aside from when im at work (signal blows at work) its exceptional, i can manage to get anywhere from 3-4 hours of screen on time or more. Just depends what all i do that day, but i leave 4G on 24/7 and only use WIFI at home, sync stays on as well. Its plenty enough to get me through each day, so about 7am to 10pm.
Neverendingxsin said:
Aside from when im at work (signal blows at work) its exceptional, i can manage to get anywhere from 3-4 hours of screen on time or more. Just depends what all i do that day, but i leave 4G on 24/7 and only use WIFI at home, sync stays on as well. Its plenty enough to get me through each day, so about 7am to 10pm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks been trying out different combinations with the kernel, i like the kernel and the tweaker app too
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
jpeezy1986 said:
Thanks been trying out different combinations with the kernel, i like the kernel and the tweaker app too
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your welcome
Following this thread because it does seem like interesting information that's not easily available anywhere else.
One important thing I see people aren't listing is what ROM they are using, especially if it's AOSP-based or TW-based.
I was running KT747 10/31 release on the first JB TW leak and was getting a lot of strange behavior, even with the stock settings.
I'll be trying it again on the latest release once I get my device dialed in (Clean ROM 4.5) and create a backup.
Do anyone have the link for ktoonsez kernel, trying out a new rom and i want to use this kernel and the ktweaker app..i searched but havent found it yet
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
It's in the original android development section.
jpeezy1986 said:
Do anyone have the link for ktoonsez kernel, trying out a new rom and i want to use this kernel and the ktweaker app..i searched but havent found it yet
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1853816
Its under Original development, may be how you missed it. I think all kernels are there because they are built from source, someone correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks, The name of the thread threw me off, i skipped over it...when i went back i saw ktoonez
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
BTW KToonsez just released an updated version today. Haven't tried it yet.
here is another thread with more info, i follow this one, i hope you find some good stuff here
It's no good. If u can find the 10-28 kernel. That's the one to use. Works great for me.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

[APP]InstaVOLT v1.5 (VDD Regulator)

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
InstaVOLT v1.5​
Decided to put it on the market for all devices that meet the requirements.
Quoted from market:
"InstaVOLT is the easiest app for managing your CPU milliVoltage levels. You can undervolt or overvolt your CPU voltage levels by steps of 25 milliVolt. Be sure to check the overall voltage levels after every increase or decrease, so you know what your device/kernel is capable of.
Requirements:
- Root
- Busybox
- Kernel with VDD levels support
Warning:
I'm not responsible for any damage caused to your device, use at own risk!
- If the voltage levels are to low your phone will freeze and you will need to pull the battery
- If the voltage levels are to high your phone will overheat and/or suddenly power off.
Since this is a very early version the app might force close when your kernel doesn't have vdd support.
Updates coming soon!"
Info for our device:
The voltage range of our device is 750mV - 1450mV.
Upcoming updates:
- Support for setting voltages at boot.
- Probably more compatibility / options
Download:
Screenshots:
Thank you brood !!!!!
edit:my thanks are gone for today but i'll not forget to hit thanks tomorrow
edit 2: please let me know if you want to translate into romanian language
Laurentyu1995 said:
Thank you brood !!!!!
edit:my thanks are gone for today but i'll not forget to hit thanks tomorrow
edit 2: please let me know if you want to translate into romanian language
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome, and hehe np, I also have that sometimes ^^.
And Ill let everyone know in this thread if I need translations :angel:
edit: thanks for adding review on the market
thanks brood for this awesome and important app
davidteri91 said:
thanks brood for this awesome and important app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're weclome
Nice app Brood, let know when you need some translators
Thanks brood! Once again an incredible job!
Here I publish my voltages with the max UV I can reach with freq between 245-1400mhz, interactiveX and row.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
mrjraider said:
Nice app Brood, let know when you need some translators
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, sure! will do ^^
jpacho89 said:
Thanks brood! Once again an incredible job!
Here I publish my voltages with the max UV I can reach with freq between 245-1400mhz, interactiveX and row.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome, thanks!;p
Wow, your overall voltage table is way lower then mine, check this out:
Mine: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yours:
how is the battery life with those voltages?
And I can lower it even 25mV more and works like a charm! But thats the limit, if I lower 50mV the phone freezes.
I will publish complete battery stats at the end of the day, don't know if they will be so good because I think that the mayor problem of battery drain is at lower voltages, I wish I could lower them more.
Anyway my phone is about 2 years old, so battery eficience may have decrease at least a 10-20%.. it's normal to have more drain than with new phone!
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
jpacho89 said:
And I can lower it even 25mV more and works like a charm! But thats the limit, if I lower 50mV the phone freezes.
I will publish complete battery stats at the end of the day, don't know if they will be so good because I think that the mayor problem of battery drain is at lower voltages, I wish I could lower them more.
Anyway my phone is about 2 years old, so battery eficience may have decrease at least a 10-20%.. it's normal to have more drain than with new phone!
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? you can put it to 725 without making it freeze? thats nice
OK thanks, ill wait for the results. and idd the major battery eater isn't the cpu/frequencies.. its something else. as Extreme UV and non UV almost result in the same results xD
And you can lower them more. in acpuclock-7x30.c you can find:
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_VDD_LEVELS
#define VDD_MIN_UV_MV 750U
#define VDD_MAX_UV_MV 1450U
which sets the limits, however, I don't know what will happen
My phone is also almost 2 years old now, and the battery is still prety decent to be honest, I thought it would be lazy as hell by this time ;p
ok I will try it later and give you feedback!
Even 375mhz doesn't lower more, when I reduce 25mV at least the rest frecuencies voltage is reduced.
You know that every single procesor is different, so maybe I was lucky with mine!
Anyway battery is enough good for me, I prefer permormance even if I have to pay a little more battery drain for it.
Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Here are my battery stats with the exUV:
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Woa, great app! Thx brood
Hyper/sio, 245-1401mhz
jpacho89 said:
Here are my battery stats with the exUV:
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the screenshots, usefull info If I have enough screenshots I can compare them
gemtin92 said:
Woa, great app! Thx brood
Hyper/sio, 245-1401mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! You're welcome
im gonna test it on my s plus, galaxy nexus, wildfire s and galaxy note 2. will report later :good:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Nice work! Mine works 1025mv @ 1400mhz and 1300mv @ 1824mhz
tomixdev said:
im gonna test it on my s plus, galaxy nexus, wildfire s and galaxy note 2. will report later :good:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice I'm curious about the results, since I patched it to 1.1 it shouldn't FC anymore when there is no vdd support possible.
In next update i will add "save on boot" (as in a new init.d script)
jormapaappa1235 said:
Nice work! Mine works 1025mv @ 1400mhz and 1300mv @ 1824mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you
edit: v1.2 live on market in a few hours, no init.d support yet but critical fixes for non supported devices
very nice app, really..cant go lower than 2x decreasing (phone freeze)..am using phenom kernel (exuv) bigmem..
Thanks brood. ^_^
m0e_03 said:
very nice app, really..cant go lower than 2x decreasing (phone freeze)..am using phenom kernel (exuv) bigmem..
Thanks brood. ^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, and if the max steps for -25mV is 2 then you've exceeded the minimal voltage, the minimal mV is 750, everything below that will freeze the phone. everything above 1450 will result in epic core meltdowns :silly:
on my note 2 its unfortunately not working, but also no fc. tried with stock and custom kernel (Adam Kernel)
will post results for my other phones tomorrow because im currently not at home.
btw. i like the idea of setting all voltages down the same amount. nice work bro
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources