Database Info

Benchmark results for the Optimus 3D

Here is a fresh benchmark that puts the O3D on top as usual:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...430-smartbench-2011-result-has-been-revealed/

These are the first benchmarks of the Optimus 3D, done by Anandtech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4179/ti-omap4-and-lg-optimus-3d-tested

power

Can somebody who has a developer unit Optimus 3d try the Nenamark 2 Benchmark and post their results please? Just curios to see what its FPS is, and compare it to other dual core devices. (i know the software isn't final build tho)
Thanks
Ian

Beaker491 said:
Can somebody who has a developer unit Optimus 3d try the Nenamark 2 Benchmark and post their results please? Just curios to see what its FPS is, and compare it to other dual core devices. (i know the software isn't final build tho)
Thanks
Ian
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just crashes when I try to run it.

Not worth an extra thread...
Android Ice Cream Sandwich To Be Optimized For Texas Instruments?
If this is true our Optimus 3D might have a bright future. ^^

HDD_x8 said:
Here is a fresh benchmark that puts the O3D on top as usual:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...430-smartbench-2011-result-has-been-revealed/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it still on top?

this benchmark is not updated, SGII has got over 3000>>> http://gurkensenf.com/wordpress/?p=9044

The SGS 2 is currently the benchmark king, but all the benchmarks that are currently on the net for O3D show that the O3D was running pre-release software. There are no final release software O3D's benchmark test results out yet.
Ian

At mwc on february in barcellona,Lg press conference showed a 2900+ points in quadrant.

SGS2 can easily get over 4000 quadrant score when overclocked to a stable 1.5GHz.
I wonder if we can overclock the O3D? If so, I reckon it will also go to 1.5GHz possibly.

I've had the pleasure to play with it yesterday at LG. Only had the time to install Quadrant.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

thank you very much!! so with 5th june rom the score is a little better thant before.
di you ask to lg for a release date?

Well the best I heard was the beginning of july in the netherlands. The representative said that with the final rom Quadrant reached about 3000, it is expected to go higher when 2.3 comes out for the Optimus 3d. 2.3 should roll out just after launch.

nice results for a phone that still runs android 2.2 and is not final software

peacekeeper05 said:
nice results for a phone that still runs android 2.2 and is not final software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, I wonder though if the 512 MB RAM will be a problem, ofcource the product-manager said it wouldn't but hey, that's his job

Has anybody managed to get the Smartbench 2011 and Nenamark 2 benchmark tests running on an O3D yet? If so, what were the results?
Thanks
Ian

http://www.intomobile.com/reviews/lg-optimus-3d-review/
Quick question, why do the benchmarks seem a bit low is this review? Neocore didn't even hit 59 FPS! And the quadrant seems a bit low of 2800+ that LG claim...
Is this review still not on final software?
Thanks
Ian

The highest i got on Quadrant was 2680. But mine is running on May software, so its not final. Don't really compare this phone to SG2 because that comes overclocked from Sammy and is on gingerbread, that's why it gets high scores. Wait til O3D gets 2.3 and overclock kernel then we shall see its potential.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA App

largo79 said:
The highest i got on Quadrant was 2680. But mine is running on May software, so its not final. Don't really compare this phone to SG2 because that comes overclocked from Sammy and is on gingerbread, that's why it gets high scores. Wait til O3D gets 2.3 and overclock kernel then we shall see its potential.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
|SGS2 is UNDERclocked, the CPU is a 1.5ghz one underclocked to 1.2ghz

[Q] Nexus S getting very low scores on Quadrant

Hi everybody!
I've been using my Nexus S for one and a half weeks by now, and I've noticed that the phone itself is very cool etc. but it's Quadrant scores (Standard Edition) are only about 1250-1390, basically. It does the "hallway" part quite well (about 40 fps), but in the "planet" and the "dna" section it's framerate drops to 10-15 fps.
Here are the average framerates of each section:
"Sun surface" - 19
"Hallway" - 45
"Flashing room" - 37
"Planet & Moon" - 11 (WTF??)
"DNA" - 19
Final result: 1385
Hope you understood my terms
The phone is running Android GB 2.3.1 (still waiting for 2.3.3), and I have heard people say that Quadrant doesn't fully support Gingerbread, but I'm still childishly annoyed about a Quadrant score so low on a such high-end(for now) device!
Do you have any explanation for this?

Quadrants mean nothing. But if it really feeds your ego, you need to update to a custom ROM + kernel to get higher numbers.
Also, there has been reports of people not getting the update to 2.3.3. So you should probably manually update to 2.3.3 (find it in the general forums "2.3.3 link" thread)

I get the same odd low scores that you do, but I get 2800 in quadrant. CM7 #36
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App

Yeah not to mention the stock kernel doesn't have this ext4 boost thing in terms of I/O speeds. it was explained by supercurio.

I get 1931 pts with mine, Nexus S GT-I9023 stock (2.3.3, GRI40, Radio KB3...)

Quadrant score means nothing.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

kemsiro said:
Quadrant score means nothing.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thanks for just repeating what i said -.-

I suggest manually installing 2.3.3 update if you really want to stay stock... other wise, CM7 rc4 or nightly with ogdobber "james bond" kernel.. it's fast, super fast.. 3200+ points on quadrant with no OC..

well, on my NS i even hit 4539 (top till now) so i can say i got no complain.. although yes it is true in the planet section especially it get REALLY low fps

NS Zaapo said:
Hi everybody!
I've been using my Nexus S for one and a half weeks by now, and I've noticed that the phone itself is very cool etc. but it's Quadrant scores (Standard Edition) are only about 1250-1390, basically. It does the "hallway" part quite well (about 40 fps), but in the "planet" and the "dna" section it's framerate drops to 10-15 fps.
Here are the average framerates of each section:
"Sun surface" - 19
"Hallway" - 45
"Flashing room" - 37
"Planet & Moon" - 11 (WTF??)
"DNA" - 19
Final result: 1385
Hope you understood my terms
The phone is running Android GB 2.3.1 (still waiting for 2.3.3), and I have heard people say that Quadrant doesn't fully support Gingerbread, but I'm still childishly annoyed about a Quadrant score so low on a such high-end(for now) device!
Do you have any explanation for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For some reason 3D part of the app runs like crap dev didn't do anything to improve this on NS
galaxy s runs same hardware yet caps out at 56fps on every graphic test
This is just another reason on top of the IO exploit that we shouldn't use this crap benchmark as a benchmark standard but try telling this to people who will continue to pop a boner over their exaggerated IO scores

NS Zaapo said:
Hi everybody!
I've been using my Nexus S for one and a half weeks by now, and I've noticed that the phone itself is very cool etc. but it's Quadrant scores (Standard Edition) are only about 1250-1390, basically. It does the "hallway" part quite well (about 40 fps), but in the "planet" and the "dna" section it's framerate drops to 10-15 fps.
Here are the average framerates of each section:
"Sun surface" - 19
"Hallway" - 45
"Flashing room" - 37
"Planet & Moon" - 11 (WTF??)
"DNA" - 19
Final result: 1385
Hope you understood my terms
The phone is running Android GB 2.3.1 (still waiting for 2.3.3), and I have heard people say that Quadrant doesn't fully support Gingerbread, but I'm still childishly annoyed about a Quadrant score so low on a such high-end(for now) device!
Do you have any explanation for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nexus s quadrant score at 1.44ghz(1st) and 1.544ghz(2nd) using cm7 and the trinity kernel..
i dont see anything low with that
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

he isn't talking about io hacks and overclocking
he is talking about the low FPS is 3d test that has been present since day one of the nexus s and dev has completely overlooked for what ever reason

Multi-Thread Linpack

Linpack has a new multi-thread app out. The best SGS2 score has been 155.597 MFLOPS. The Zoom is the reigning champion. Any of you run it yet?

Looks like the Evo 3D to me with 201.754
I'm getting crap with CM7 lol. 39.807 for both single and multithread
Of course I'm running stock everything. Be interesting to see what a EXT4 kernel with a 1.5ghz OC gets.

I don't know if I'mdoing it right, but it only takes about half a second to run the test? And I'm getting results all over the place between 81 and 101.
edit: Oh, that was at 1300MHz...when I pumped it up to 1500, I'm getting values between 93 and 113 on multithread.
Running EB 1.05 w/faux 0.0.3 1500uv/oc

I noticed mine says "Inconsistent Result" for Precision. Seems goofy. Very weird. Doesn't seem accurate.
If I keep doing it, sometimes I get a value for "Precision" but the MFLOPS are all over the place. Like above but mine go from high 30's to low 100's.
Again with CM7.

CM57 + Morifc @ 1.5/1.5 = 107.568
Update: Saw the Evo 3d scores were off the hook so I ran it on my Sensation (same exact processor) and got 15 wtf

lol.
15 eh?

player911 said:
lol.
15 eh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
appears they worked this app with the evo and x2.
and made it work for those processors.
someone said the evo3d and sensation are same processor but i thought that the
sensation was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8260
evo3d was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8660
did this change. if not this may explain why its not working on the sensation as it does on the evo even though the chips are simialair their must be some differences.
???????

appears to be the worlds worst benchmark tool

eagle1967 said:
appears they worked this app with the evo and x2.
and made it work for those processors.
someone said the evo3d and sensation are same processor but i thought that the
sensation was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8260
evo3d was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8660
did this change. if not this may explain why its not working on the sensation as it does on the evo even though the chips are simialair their must be some differences.
???????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right you are. The difference is because of the different radios, one being GSM the other CDMA. Could explain things.

I got a score of 140+ but it was Inconsistent Result. But when it does go through it is around 118 OC @ 1.55. I think it still has some bugs to be worked out for sure.

My stock Atrix is now hitting almost 90mflops!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I get 115 118 on oc 1500 but says inconsistent most times.
I believe from my experience with benchmarks is that these are made to favor certain setups ( ie. A specific phone.) I have no problems oc to 1500 all benchmarks run fine.
But on the smartbench 2011 it will give me invalid results on the 1500 oc every time. But the test run fine with no issues. Just my thought on this. Totally take these with a grain of salt.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

Intel Medfield based Lava Xolo X900

Lava has launched the Xolo X900 smartphone which also becomes the first Intel powered smartphone in the world for Rs 22,000.
The device is based on the Intel Medfield reference design and features a 1.6GHz Atom processor, a GPU clocked at 400MHz, a 4.03-inch display with a resolution of 1024×600 pixels, a 8-megapixel camera with 1080p shooting capabilities, NFC and HDMI connectivity. Intel claims the camera can take 10 pictures in under a second in full resolution in burst mode setting. Lava says the device can produce five hours of battery life with 3G browsing and can deliver 45 hours of audio and eight hours of talk time.
The device run stock Android 2.3 and will not ship with the latest version of Android Ice Cream Sandwich. For its part Lava says an OTA Ice Cream Sandwich update is in the works.
The device will be available in India on April 23 at Croma or from Xolo.in, and will hit retail chains in early May.
We are feel happy because it launched in india first

And now: why do you post in O1 forum?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Seek the signature below the line

vlt96 said:
And now: why do you post in O1 forum?
Seek the signature below the line
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude its a general thread that's why i just want to inform to every one...

Development on XOLO?
Is there anyone here developing for this device or no one has even bothered so far?

I did a YouTube battery life test on my Xolo. Set to auto brightness. Watching the 2 hour, 6 minute 2012 Google I/O took exactly 50% of the battery.
Sent from my HTC One S

I guess people would be a little bit skeptical in buying a 22k lava...

Standby time is pretty sweet. 2 days, 20 hours standby, and 2:15 of screen time.
Sent from my X900 using Tapatalk 2

The only thing is that it stuck due to brand name of mobile if it will launched with Samsung then it will grab the market rapidly !

now it's available for 17k and an ICS update is now being rolled out,wanted to buy it but it's reviews seem that camera us not upto par with say s2 but considering the pric, it's pretty good deal:thumbup:
and guys i have used it on demo at a shop its of pretty good build and there is no lava branding.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 Dev Alpha using XDA

chrissmartin said:
now it's available for 17k and an ICS update is now being rolled out,wanted to buy it but it's reviews seem that camera us not upto par with say s2 but considering the pric, it's pretty good deal:thumbup:
and guys i have used it on demo at a shop its of pretty good build and there is no lava branding.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 Dev Alpha using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the camera is so so, and although standby time was great, screen time was low(2-3 hours).
Sent from my LG-P880 using Tapatalk 2

General Post your benchmark results

I run a few benchmarks. Quite happy with the results. I have Exynos 2200. All benchmarks were run prior to software update.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Here are my results Exynos 8/ 128GB.
Have you changed some parameters to get these results? are you in WQHD or FHD?

Rip

Snap 8gb/128gb

My latest test.

DeHAWK said:
My latest test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you done the test inside the fridge freezer mate very nice score..

Ceza21 said:
Have you done the test inside the fridge freezer mate very nice score..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro, must say I'm very satisfied with my S22 Ultra. But we still need Samsung to do some tweeking, specially with the graphics driver. My phone doesn't even get hot during the test, so my phone can with no doubt manage a higher CPU and GPU clock freq. Hope it will happen, otherwise rooting and own build kernel.
Regards DeHAWK

DeHAWK said:
Thanks bro, must say I'm very satisfied with my S22 Ultra. But we still need Samsung to do some tweeking, specially with the graphics driver. My phone doesn't even get hot during the test, so my phone can with no doubt manage a higher CPU and GPU clock freq. Hope it will happen, otherwise rooting and own build kernel.
Regards DeHAWK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm quite happy with mine too and I 100% agree with you that the new Soc and gpu needs updated drivers and optimisation ..also thirdparty apps also need to update their apps for the brand new gpu from AMD than we will have a perfect device ....or maybe that's never gonna happen..

Exynos without new firmware

Max i can get is
820k in antutu
650 single / 3300 multi / 9000 opencl in geekbench
5050 in wild life...
Huge underperformance. I tried even fresh install today, nothing helped.
I have s22u exynos 8/128

Exynos

You can imagine I'm not amused about the results, lol.

New test with updated software fxck samsung