Database Info

Benchmark results for the Optimus 3D

Here is a fresh benchmark that puts the O3D on top as usual:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...430-smartbench-2011-result-has-been-revealed/

These are the first benchmarks of the Optimus 3D, done by Anandtech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4179/ti-omap4-and-lg-optimus-3d-tested

power

Can somebody who has a developer unit Optimus 3d try the Nenamark 2 Benchmark and post their results please? Just curios to see what its FPS is, and compare it to other dual core devices. (i know the software isn't final build tho)
Thanks
Ian

Beaker491 said:
Can somebody who has a developer unit Optimus 3d try the Nenamark 2 Benchmark and post their results please? Just curios to see what its FPS is, and compare it to other dual core devices. (i know the software isn't final build tho)
Thanks
Ian
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just crashes when I try to run it.

Not worth an extra thread...
Android Ice Cream Sandwich To Be Optimized For Texas Instruments?
If this is true our Optimus 3D might have a bright future. ^^

HDD_x8 said:
Here is a fresh benchmark that puts the O3D on top as usual:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...430-smartbench-2011-result-has-been-revealed/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it still on top?

this benchmark is not updated, SGII has got over 3000>>> http://gurkensenf.com/wordpress/?p=9044

The SGS 2 is currently the benchmark king, but all the benchmarks that are currently on the net for O3D show that the O3D was running pre-release software. There are no final release software O3D's benchmark test results out yet.
Ian

At mwc on february in barcellona,Lg press conference showed a 2900+ points in quadrant.

SGS2 can easily get over 4000 quadrant score when overclocked to a stable 1.5GHz.
I wonder if we can overclock the O3D? If so, I reckon it will also go to 1.5GHz possibly.

I've had the pleasure to play with it yesterday at LG. Only had the time to install Quadrant.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

thank you very much!! so with 5th june rom the score is a little better thant before.
di you ask to lg for a release date?

Well the best I heard was the beginning of july in the netherlands. The representative said that with the final rom Quadrant reached about 3000, it is expected to go higher when 2.3 comes out for the Optimus 3d. 2.3 should roll out just after launch.

nice results for a phone that still runs android 2.2 and is not final software

peacekeeper05 said:
nice results for a phone that still runs android 2.2 and is not final software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, I wonder though if the 512 MB RAM will be a problem, ofcource the product-manager said it wouldn't but hey, that's his job

Has anybody managed to get the Smartbench 2011 and Nenamark 2 benchmark tests running on an O3D yet? If so, what were the results?
Thanks
Ian

http://www.intomobile.com/reviews/lg-optimus-3d-review/
Quick question, why do the benchmarks seem a bit low is this review? Neocore didn't even hit 59 FPS! And the quadrant seems a bit low of 2800+ that LG claim...
Is this review still not on final software?
Thanks
Ian

The highest i got on Quadrant was 2680. But mine is running on May software, so its not final. Don't really compare this phone to SG2 because that comes overclocked from Sammy and is on gingerbread, that's why it gets high scores. Wait til O3D gets 2.3 and overclock kernel then we shall see its potential.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA App

largo79 said:
The highest i got on Quadrant was 2680. But mine is running on May software, so its not final. Don't really compare this phone to SG2 because that comes overclocked from Sammy and is on gingerbread, that's why it gets high scores. Wait til O3D gets 2.3 and overclock kernel then we shall see its potential.
Sent from my LG-P920 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
|SGS2 is UNDERclocked, the CPU is a 1.5ghz one underclocked to 1.2ghz

[Q] Nexus S getting very low scores on Quadrant

Hi everybody!
I've been using my Nexus S for one and a half weeks by now, and I've noticed that the phone itself is very cool etc. but it's Quadrant scores (Standard Edition) are only about 1250-1390, basically. It does the "hallway" part quite well (about 40 fps), but in the "planet" and the "dna" section it's framerate drops to 10-15 fps.
Here are the average framerates of each section:
"Sun surface" - 19
"Hallway" - 45
"Flashing room" - 37
"Planet & Moon" - 11 (WTF??)
"DNA" - 19
Final result: 1385
Hope you understood my terms
The phone is running Android GB 2.3.1 (still waiting for 2.3.3), and I have heard people say that Quadrant doesn't fully support Gingerbread, but I'm still childishly annoyed about a Quadrant score so low on a such high-end(for now) device!
Do you have any explanation for this?

Quadrants mean nothing. But if it really feeds your ego, you need to update to a custom ROM + kernel to get higher numbers.
Also, there has been reports of people not getting the update to 2.3.3. So you should probably manually update to 2.3.3 (find it in the general forums "2.3.3 link" thread)

I get the same odd low scores that you do, but I get 2800 in quadrant. CM7 #36
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App

Yeah not to mention the stock kernel doesn't have this ext4 boost thing in terms of I/O speeds. it was explained by supercurio.

I get 1931 pts with mine, Nexus S GT-I9023 stock (2.3.3, GRI40, Radio KB3...)

Quadrant score means nothing.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

kemsiro said:
Quadrant score means nothing.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah thanks for just repeating what i said -.-

I suggest manually installing 2.3.3 update if you really want to stay stock... other wise, CM7 rc4 or nightly with ogdobber "james bond" kernel.. it's fast, super fast.. 3200+ points on quadrant with no OC..

well, on my NS i even hit 4539 (top till now) so i can say i got no complain.. although yes it is true in the planet section especially it get REALLY low fps

NS Zaapo said:
Hi everybody!
I've been using my Nexus S for one and a half weeks by now, and I've noticed that the phone itself is very cool etc. but it's Quadrant scores (Standard Edition) are only about 1250-1390, basically. It does the "hallway" part quite well (about 40 fps), but in the "planet" and the "dna" section it's framerate drops to 10-15 fps.
Here are the average framerates of each section:
"Sun surface" - 19
"Hallway" - 45
"Flashing room" - 37
"Planet & Moon" - 11 (WTF??)
"DNA" - 19
Final result: 1385
Hope you understood my terms
The phone is running Android GB 2.3.1 (still waiting for 2.3.3), and I have heard people say that Quadrant doesn't fully support Gingerbread, but I'm still childishly annoyed about a Quadrant score so low on a such high-end(for now) device!
Do you have any explanation for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For some reason 3D part of the app runs like crap dev didn't do anything to improve this on NS
galaxy s runs same hardware yet caps out at 56fps on every graphic test
This is just another reason on top of the IO exploit that we shouldn't use this crap benchmark as a benchmark standard but try telling this to people who will continue to pop a boner over their exaggerated IO scores

NS Zaapo said:
Hi everybody!
I've been using my Nexus S for one and a half weeks by now, and I've noticed that the phone itself is very cool etc. but it's Quadrant scores (Standard Edition) are only about 1250-1390, basically. It does the "hallway" part quite well (about 40 fps), but in the "planet" and the "dna" section it's framerate drops to 10-15 fps.
Here are the average framerates of each section:
"Sun surface" - 19
"Hallway" - 45
"Flashing room" - 37
"Planet & Moon" - 11 (WTF??)
"DNA" - 19
Final result: 1385
Hope you understood my terms
The phone is running Android GB 2.3.1 (still waiting for 2.3.3), and I have heard people say that Quadrant doesn't fully support Gingerbread, but I'm still childishly annoyed about a Quadrant score so low on a such high-end(for now) device!
Do you have any explanation for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nexus s quadrant score at 1.44ghz(1st) and 1.544ghz(2nd) using cm7 and the trinity kernel..
i dont see anything low with that
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

he isn't talking about io hacks and overclocking
he is talking about the low FPS is 3d test that has been present since day one of the nexus s and dev has completely overlooked for what ever reason

Lets see some ICS ROM benchmarks

Hey guys, now that we have been playing with the various ICS ROMs, lets see some benchmarks along with your ROM and any tweaks that you feel got you to your score. I saw reports of some great benchmarks, however mine suck. Id love to see which ROMs score what.
EDIT: Oh yea, if you dont like Benchmarks, go away. Bashing benchmarks is played.
Matt

[email protected] with arhd 5.0.2
[email protected]
[email protected]

44.1 fps with Nenamark2 on Virtuous @ 1.188 GHz max 368MHz min.

2D performance has improved a lot -- I'm seeing double the FPS compared to GB ROMs -- that's all I've taken from Quadrant (max I'll get is 2200). Probably has to do with hardware acceleration.

Quadrant is extremely outdated and was not a very good benchmarker when it was up to date. It is inconsistant and, correct me if I am wrong, it does not take advantage of dual cores.
Nenamark is a great 3D benchmark.
Also, here is a screen shot I took a long time ago with my Nexus One.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
According to Quadrant the Sensation is just a tad better than the Sexy Nexie.

Yeah wow, the most people were able to get in NenaMark 2 was around 29 fps with Gingerbread. I got 43 fps...pretty significant improvement. 59.4 fps in NenaMark 1.

nenamark2-43.8
Megadroid ICS
Sent from my HTC Sensation MeGaDroid 4.0.1

Virtuous Inquisition 1.3
---------- Post added at 12:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 AM ----------
aNYthing24 said:
Yeah wow, the most people were able to get in NenaMark 2 was around 29 fps with Gingerbread. I got 43 fps...pretty significant improvement. 59.4 fps in NenaMark 1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't mention which ROM. I'm assuming Virtuous

Actually the 3D performance increased after 2.08 update which brings android 2.3.5 with updated adreno drivers. I score 38-40 with 2.08, on the official sense 3 there is 25 fps max limit.
Anyway I read that 3D games don't work with ics build or works with noticeable lag. Is that true or games is playable now?

Antutu - 7106 - TripNiCE.

44.1 fps on nenamark 2...
Device: HTC Sensation - S-off - Rooted - 32Gb sd
ROM: ARHD 5.0.2 ICS + no-sense
Kernel: Stock
Radio: 11.59.3504.00U_11.16.3504.16_M
Recovery: 4Ext Touch

[Q] Graphics performance - Bad Hardware or Bad Drivers?

I have been using Galaxy SL since last 10 months and one thing that has bugged me since I bought it is bad graphics performance (both on GB & Froyo). Now, I am not complaining about the low powered GPU but simply it's bad performance.
I just wanted to confirm if anybody else here suffers from the same and whether it's a software bug or a hardware problem.
Here are a few comparison pics (compared to my Xperia Neo V):
Galaxy SL (Left) , Xperia Neo V (Right)
Sygic Aura:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sprinkle:
Note the appearance of water
Paper Camera:
It doesn't work the first time you start it, but after restarting the app it works although it breaks h/w acceleration for rest of the apps such as camera, video playback etc.
I also own a ZTE Blade and a Acer Icona A500, and both of them perform the same as Xperia. Can anybody else confirm similar issues on Galaxy SL? Or should I go for a replacement?

I just downloaded sprinkle from the market and im not having your problem. The water is the same as the Xperia one. Maybe you should ask for a replacement from Samsung? Faulty GPU maybe? You never know

BassBlaster said:
I just downloaded sprinkle from the market and im not having your problem. The water is the same as the Xperia one. Maybe you should ask for a replacement from Samsung? Faulty GPU maybe? You never know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for checking it out, can you try it maybe after playing a video or doing some gaming. As, mine also works fine after restarting the phone but after doing some work like gaming, watching videos it breaks as in the screen shot. Can you also try Paper Camera? I'll appreciate your help.
I am still covered by warranty so I may go for a replacement.
PS: I have never OC'd my phone and also tried the graphics solution mentioned in the forum (editing the egl.cfg and deleting libGLES_android.so) but no solution so far.

I tried Sprinkle too and the water is weird (to avoid misunderstandings:http://i.imgur.com/C3U1ml.jpg).
I'm using CM7, I don't know if the performance are the same as stock roms.
Anyway the Xperia neo V has an Adreno 205, which is better than our PowerVR SGX530, if I'm not wrong.

loSconosciuto said:
I tried Sprinkle too and the water is weird (to avoid misunderstandings:http://i.imgur.com/C3U1ml.jpg).
I'm using CM7, I don't know if the performance are the same as stock roms.
Anyway the Xperia neo V has an Adreno 205, which is better than our PowerVR SGX530, if I'm not wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for confirming my doubt, I guessed this could be a widespread problem. Moreover, it doesn't concern the GPU power, as a ZTE Blade with Adreno 200 runs it better and I think it's equivalent if not better to our PowerVR 530.
So, what could be causing it? Bad drivers? Does all PowerVR 530 devices face the same issue?

oh?!
mhh.. very interesting :?

The GPU isn't the best, but from missing textures in one of the benchmark apps, i'd say it's incomplete drivers.

Just for Root rom
Use root explorer .. just remove system/lib/egl/remove libGLES_android.so
Will solve graphics

RonnYap said:
Use root explorer .. just remove system/lib/egl/remove libGLES_android.so
Will solve graphics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have already mentioned in my second post, that I am using this method. AFAIK, it just gives a little boost in benchmark scores nothing else.
I was wondering if Optimus Black users also have this problem...

General Post your benchmark results

I run a few benchmarks. Quite happy with the results. I have Exynos 2200. All benchmarks were run prior to software update.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Here are my results Exynos 8/ 128GB.
Have you changed some parameters to get these results? are you in WQHD or FHD?

Rip

Snap 8gb/128gb

My latest test.

DeHAWK said:
My latest test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you done the test inside the fridge freezer mate very nice score..

Ceza21 said:
Have you done the test inside the fridge freezer mate very nice score..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro, must say I'm very satisfied with my S22 Ultra. But we still need Samsung to do some tweeking, specially with the graphics driver. My phone doesn't even get hot during the test, so my phone can with no doubt manage a higher CPU and GPU clock freq. Hope it will happen, otherwise rooting and own build kernel.
Regards DeHAWK

DeHAWK said:
Thanks bro, must say I'm very satisfied with my S22 Ultra. But we still need Samsung to do some tweeking, specially with the graphics driver. My phone doesn't even get hot during the test, so my phone can with no doubt manage a higher CPU and GPU clock freq. Hope it will happen, otherwise rooting and own build kernel.
Regards DeHAWK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm quite happy with mine too and I 100% agree with you that the new Soc and gpu needs updated drivers and optimisation ..also thirdparty apps also need to update their apps for the brand new gpu from AMD than we will have a perfect device ....or maybe that's never gonna happen..

Exynos without new firmware

Max i can get is
820k in antutu
650 single / 3300 multi / 9000 opencl in geekbench
5050 in wild life...
Huge underperformance. I tried even fresh install today, nothing helped.
I have s22u exynos 8/128

Exynos

You can imagine I'm not amused about the results, lol.

New test with updated software fxck samsung