Database Info

Multi-Thread Linpack

Linpack has a new multi-thread app out. The best SGS2 score has been 155.597 MFLOPS. The Zoom is the reigning champion. Any of you run it yet?

Looks like the Evo 3D to me with 201.754
I'm getting crap with CM7 lol. 39.807 for both single and multithread
Of course I'm running stock everything. Be interesting to see what a EXT4 kernel with a 1.5ghz OC gets.

I don't know if I'mdoing it right, but it only takes about half a second to run the test? And I'm getting results all over the place between 81 and 101.
edit: Oh, that was at 1300MHz...when I pumped it up to 1500, I'm getting values between 93 and 113 on multithread.
Running EB 1.05 w/faux 0.0.3 1500uv/oc

I noticed mine says "Inconsistent Result" for Precision. Seems goofy. Very weird. Doesn't seem accurate.
If I keep doing it, sometimes I get a value for "Precision" but the MFLOPS are all over the place. Like above but mine go from high 30's to low 100's.
Again with CM7.

CM57 + Morifc @ 1.5/1.5 = 107.568
Update: Saw the Evo 3d scores were off the hook so I ran it on my Sensation (same exact processor) and got 15 wtf

lol.
15 eh?

player911 said:
lol.
15 eh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
appears they worked this app with the evo and x2.
and made it work for those processors.
someone said the evo3d and sensation are same processor but i thought that the
sensation was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8260
evo3d was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8660
did this change. if not this may explain why its not working on the sensation as it does on the evo even though the chips are simialair their must be some differences.
???????

appears to be the worlds worst benchmark tool

eagle1967 said:
appears they worked this app with the evo and x2.
and made it work for those processors.
someone said the evo3d and sensation are same processor but i thought that the
sensation was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8260
evo3d was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8660
did this change. if not this may explain why its not working on the sensation as it does on the evo even though the chips are simialair their must be some differences.
???????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right you are. The difference is because of the different radios, one being GSM the other CDMA. Could explain things.

I got a score of 140+ but it was Inconsistent Result. But when it does go through it is around 118 OC @ 1.55. I think it still has some bugs to be worked out for sure.

My stock Atrix is now hitting almost 90mflops!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I get 115 118 on oc 1500 but says inconsistent most times.
I believe from my experience with benchmarks is that these are made to favor certain setups ( ie. A specific phone.) I have no problems oc to 1500 all benchmarks run fine.
But on the smartbench 2011 it will give me invalid results on the 1500 oc every time. But the test run fine with no issues. Just my thought on this. Totally take these with a grain of salt.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

Lets see some ICS ROM benchmarks

Hey guys, now that we have been playing with the various ICS ROMs, lets see some benchmarks along with your ROM and any tweaks that you feel got you to your score. I saw reports of some great benchmarks, however mine suck. Id love to see which ROMs score what.
EDIT: Oh yea, if you dont like Benchmarks, go away. Bashing benchmarks is played.
Matt

[email protected] with arhd 5.0.2
[email protected]
[email protected]

44.1 fps with Nenamark2 on Virtuous @ 1.188 GHz max 368MHz min.

2D performance has improved a lot -- I'm seeing double the FPS compared to GB ROMs -- that's all I've taken from Quadrant (max I'll get is 2200). Probably has to do with hardware acceleration.

Quadrant is extremely outdated and was not a very good benchmarker when it was up to date. It is inconsistant and, correct me if I am wrong, it does not take advantage of dual cores.
Nenamark is a great 3D benchmark.
Also, here is a screen shot I took a long time ago with my Nexus One.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
According to Quadrant the Sensation is just a tad better than the Sexy Nexie.

Yeah wow, the most people were able to get in NenaMark 2 was around 29 fps with Gingerbread. I got 43 fps...pretty significant improvement. 59.4 fps in NenaMark 1.

nenamark2-43.8
Megadroid ICS
Sent from my HTC Sensation MeGaDroid 4.0.1

Virtuous Inquisition 1.3
---------- Post added at 12:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 AM ----------
aNYthing24 said:
Yeah wow, the most people were able to get in NenaMark 2 was around 29 fps with Gingerbread. I got 43 fps...pretty significant improvement. 59.4 fps in NenaMark 1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't mention which ROM. I'm assuming Virtuous

Actually the 3D performance increased after 2.08 update which brings android 2.3.5 with updated adreno drivers. I score 38-40 with 2.08, on the official sense 3 there is 25 fps max limit.
Anyway I read that 3D games don't work with ics build or works with noticeable lag. Is that true or games is playable now?

Antutu - 7106 - TripNiCE.

44.1 fps on nenamark 2...
Device: HTC Sensation - S-off - Rooted - 32Gb sd
ROM: ARHD 5.0.2 ICS + no-sense
Kernel: Stock
Radio: 11.59.3504.00U_11.16.3504.16_M
Recovery: 4Ext Touch

[Q] Graphics performance - Bad Hardware or Bad Drivers?

I have been using Galaxy SL since last 10 months and one thing that has bugged me since I bought it is bad graphics performance (both on GB & Froyo). Now, I am not complaining about the low powered GPU but simply it's bad performance.
I just wanted to confirm if anybody else here suffers from the same and whether it's a software bug or a hardware problem.
Here are a few comparison pics (compared to my Xperia Neo V):
Galaxy SL (Left) , Xperia Neo V (Right)
Sygic Aura:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sprinkle:
Note the appearance of water
Paper Camera:
It doesn't work the first time you start it, but after restarting the app it works although it breaks h/w acceleration for rest of the apps such as camera, video playback etc.
I also own a ZTE Blade and a Acer Icona A500, and both of them perform the same as Xperia. Can anybody else confirm similar issues on Galaxy SL? Or should I go for a replacement?

I just downloaded sprinkle from the market and im not having your problem. The water is the same as the Xperia one. Maybe you should ask for a replacement from Samsung? Faulty GPU maybe? You never know

BassBlaster said:
I just downloaded sprinkle from the market and im not having your problem. The water is the same as the Xperia one. Maybe you should ask for a replacement from Samsung? Faulty GPU maybe? You never know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for checking it out, can you try it maybe after playing a video or doing some gaming. As, mine also works fine after restarting the phone but after doing some work like gaming, watching videos it breaks as in the screen shot. Can you also try Paper Camera? I'll appreciate your help.
I am still covered by warranty so I may go for a replacement.
PS: I have never OC'd my phone and also tried the graphics solution mentioned in the forum (editing the egl.cfg and deleting libGLES_android.so) but no solution so far.

I tried Sprinkle too and the water is weird (to avoid misunderstandings:http://i.imgur.com/C3U1ml.jpg).
I'm using CM7, I don't know if the performance are the same as stock roms.
Anyway the Xperia neo V has an Adreno 205, which is better than our PowerVR SGX530, if I'm not wrong.

loSconosciuto said:
I tried Sprinkle too and the water is weird (to avoid misunderstandings:http://i.imgur.com/C3U1ml.jpg).
I'm using CM7, I don't know if the performance are the same as stock roms.
Anyway the Xperia neo V has an Adreno 205, which is better than our PowerVR SGX530, if I'm not wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for confirming my doubt, I guessed this could be a widespread problem. Moreover, it doesn't concern the GPU power, as a ZTE Blade with Adreno 200 runs it better and I think it's equivalent if not better to our PowerVR 530.
So, what could be causing it? Bad drivers? Does all PowerVR 530 devices face the same issue?

oh?!
mhh.. very interesting :?

The GPU isn't the best, but from missing textures in one of the benchmark apps, i'd say it's incomplete drivers.

Just for Root rom
Use root explorer .. just remove system/lib/egl/remove libGLES_android.so
Will solve graphics

RonnYap said:
Use root explorer .. just remove system/lib/egl/remove libGLES_android.so
Will solve graphics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have already mentioned in my second post, that I am using this method. AFAIK, it just gives a little boost in benchmark scores nothing else.
I was wondering if Optimus Black users also have this problem...

benchmark tests compared to tf prime

Hi guys, I just got my brand new tf700 to exchange my prime.
being spoiled by the speed of the 4.1 cyanogenmod preview on the prime (I'm hoping the jb development starts soon for the tf700) I felt the tf700 sluggishness. Normally I don't compare with benchmarks. But here I did and I noticed something extreme.
The tf700 did a 3705 points in performance mode. And I didn't compare it to the 4.1 flying machine, but to the normal benchmark score of the prime (over 4000) looking at the graph it seems the only real place where the tf700 lost points was in IO performance.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Do your Tf700 score as low as this one? Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks for your input!

Mine scores between 4200-4300. Hope that helps.

that is odd. Mine is full stock, and in performance mode its always 4300-4500. 4505 is my higthest.

Quadrant scores might be lower due to the I/O issue, but also remember that the TF700t is running quadrant in 1920x1200 whereas the prime only had to do something like 1280x800. Same reason your framerates go down when you bump up resolution on a PC game, takes more power to output more pixels.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

first i was thinking the same thing! It has to push more pixels around. but: IO performance shouldn't be affected by that and others score higher
but what can one do with such bad io performance.... isn't that somehow software related too? doesn't the same type of storage either "work" or "don't work"?
thanks guys for the comparison numbers! it helps. Is your IO part as small as mine or as big as the competitors?

All Asus tabs apparently suffer from poor I/O performance. I don't remember why exactly, has something to do with how the software communicates with internal storage? I think some fixes/tweaks were made for the prime, I'm sure we'll end up with a solution for the infinity as development grows.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I hope so, thanks for the input. Sadly the other infinities seem to score "normal"
in the worst case i'll look into the SD IO solution... and in the meantime I'll try to enjoy my tablet for now !

Sorry for being so slow but I found the problem after reading the tweaks thread (which I should have read through before)
After disabling "force gpu rendering" in the developers settings I got 4300 at first try.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app

ka1z0ku said:
All Asus tabs apparently suffer from poor I/O performance. I don't remember why exactly, has something to do with how the software communicates with internal storage? I think some fixes/tweaks were made for the prime, I'm sure we'll end up with a solution for the infinity as development grows.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe a teardown discovered that Asus has chosen to use entry level (Kingston?) storage in order to save costs. There is (was?) a thread about it on the TF201 forums a few months ago.

RAM Usage

Hey guys, planning to get an 8T, but deciding between 8 or 12gb.
How much RAM is OxygenOS using upon fresh startup? As in after closing all apps running.

Wouldnt be much. 8 or 12GB is more than enough to run a phone comfortably.

Keno_I said:
Wouldnt be much. 8 or 12GB is more than enough to run a phone comfortably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah my current s20, after opening a few apps and 2 games which i toggle back and forth, ram usage is at 8gb now. so i'm curious if 8gb with OxygenOS would still be comfortable.

Yep. Not much difference betwwen oos and one ui
They are just both edited versions of android.

Yeah just tryna find out how much free ram is available.

shawnaye said:
Yeah just tryna find out how much free ram is available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The RAM is available, but after looking through searches looks like oneplus sucks at ram management.

The android 11 update made it worse now consuming 3.5GB of ram. I personally think that is really annoying but yeah....
3.0GB free
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

shawnaye said:
Yeah just tryna find out how much free ram is available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I average 40% free of 8 GB over 24 hours.

Most of the RAM is cache. Don't worry, 8 is enough.

Keno_I said:
The android 11 update made it worse now consuming 3.5GB of ram. I personally think that is really annoying but yeah....
3.0GB free
View attachment 5341137
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually good that System is taking up more memory. This means the UI will be much quicker.

Keno_I said:
The android 11 update made it worse now consuming 3.5GB of ram. I personally think that is bull**** but yeah....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xocomaox said:
It's actually good that System is taking up more memory. This means the UI will be much quicker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well there you got it

Oxygen OS uses ram to be fluid and speedy. Free ram is useless ram