benchmark tests compared to tf prime - Asus Transformer TF700

Hi guys, I just got my brand new tf700 to exchange my prime.
being spoiled by the speed of the 4.1 cyanogenmod preview on the prime (I'm hoping the jb development starts soon for the tf700) I felt the tf700 sluggishness. Normally I don't compare with benchmarks. But here I did and I noticed something extreme.
The tf700 did a 3705 points in performance mode. And I didn't compare it to the 4.1 flying machine, but to the normal benchmark score of the prime (over 4000) looking at the graph it seems the only real place where the tf700 lost points was in IO performance.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Do your Tf700 score as low as this one? Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks for your input!

Mine scores between 4200-4300. Hope that helps.

that is odd. Mine is full stock, and in performance mode its always 4300-4500. 4505 is my higthest.

Quadrant scores might be lower due to the I/O issue, but also remember that the TF700t is running quadrant in 1920x1200 whereas the prime only had to do something like 1280x800. Same reason your framerates go down when you bump up resolution on a PC game, takes more power to output more pixels.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

first i was thinking the same thing! It has to push more pixels around. but: IO performance shouldn't be affected by that and others score higher
but what can one do with such bad io performance.... isn't that somehow software related too? doesn't the same type of storage either "work" or "don't work"?
thanks guys for the comparison numbers! it helps. Is your IO part as small as mine or as big as the competitors?

All Asus tabs apparently suffer from poor I/O performance. I don't remember why exactly, has something to do with how the software communicates with internal storage? I think some fixes/tweaks were made for the prime, I'm sure we'll end up with a solution for the infinity as development grows.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I hope so, thanks for the input. Sadly the other infinities seem to score "normal"
in the worst case i'll look into the SD IO solution... and in the meantime I'll try to enjoy my tablet for now !

Sorry for being so slow but I found the problem after reading the tweaks thread (which I should have read through before)
After disabling "force gpu rendering" in the developers settings I got 4300 at first try.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app

ka1z0ku said:
All Asus tabs apparently suffer from poor I/O performance. I don't remember why exactly, has something to do with how the software communicates with internal storage? I think some fixes/tweaks were made for the prime, I'm sure we'll end up with a solution for the infinity as development grows.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe a teardown discovered that Asus has chosen to use entry level (Kingston?) storage in order to save costs. There is (was?) a thread about it on the TF201 forums a few months ago.

Related

Multi-Thread Linpack

Linpack has a new multi-thread app out. The best SGS2 score has been 155.597 MFLOPS. The Zoom is the reigning champion. Any of you run it yet?
Looks like the Evo 3D to me with 201.754
I'm getting crap with CM7 lol. 39.807 for both single and multithread
Of course I'm running stock everything. Be interesting to see what a EXT4 kernel with a 1.5ghz OC gets.
I don't know if I'mdoing it right, but it only takes about half a second to run the test? And I'm getting results all over the place between 81 and 101.
edit: Oh, that was at 1300MHz...when I pumped it up to 1500, I'm getting values between 93 and 113 on multithread.
Running EB 1.05 w/faux 0.0.3 1500uv/oc
I noticed mine says "Inconsistent Result" for Precision. Seems goofy. Very weird. Doesn't seem accurate.
If I keep doing it, sometimes I get a value for "Precision" but the MFLOPS are all over the place. Like above but mine go from high 30's to low 100's.
Again with CM7.
CM57 + Morifc @ 1.5/1.5 = 107.568
Update: Saw the Evo 3d scores were off the hook so I ran it on my Sensation (same exact processor) and got 15 wtf
lol.
15 eh?
player911 said:
lol.
15 eh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
appears they worked this app with the evo and x2.
and made it work for those processors.
someone said the evo3d and sensation are same processor but i thought that the
sensation was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8260
evo3d was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8660
did this change. if not this may explain why its not working on the sensation as it does on the evo even though the chips are simialair their must be some differences.
???????
appears to be the worlds worst benchmark tool
eagle1967 said:
appears they worked this app with the evo and x2.
and made it work for those processors.
someone said the evo3d and sensation are same processor but i thought that the
sensation was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8260
evo3d was a 1.2GHz Qualcomm MSM8660
did this change. if not this may explain why its not working on the sensation as it does on the evo even though the chips are simialair their must be some differences.
???????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right you are. The difference is because of the different radios, one being GSM the other CDMA. Could explain things.
I got a score of 140+ but it was Inconsistent Result. But when it does go through it is around 118 OC @ 1.55. I think it still has some bugs to be worked out for sure.
My stock Atrix is now hitting almost 90mflops!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I get 115 118 on oc 1500 but says inconsistent most times.
I believe from my experience with benchmarks is that these are made to favor certain setups ( ie. A specific phone.) I have no problems oc to 1500 all benchmarks run fine.
But on the smartbench 2011 it will give me invalid results on the 1500 oc every time. But the test run fine with no issues. Just my thought on this. Totally take these with a grain of salt.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App

[Q] Graphics performance - Bad Hardware or Bad Drivers?

I have been using Galaxy SL since last 10 months and one thing that has bugged me since I bought it is bad graphics performance (both on GB & Froyo). Now, I am not complaining about the low powered GPU but simply it's bad performance.
I just wanted to confirm if anybody else here suffers from the same and whether it's a software bug or a hardware problem.
Here are a few comparison pics (compared to my Xperia Neo V):
Galaxy SL (Left) , Xperia Neo V (Right)
Sygic Aura:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sprinkle:
Note the appearance of water
Paper Camera:
It doesn't work the first time you start it, but after restarting the app it works although it breaks h/w acceleration for rest of the apps such as camera, video playback etc.
I also own a ZTE Blade and a Acer Icona A500, and both of them perform the same as Xperia. Can anybody else confirm similar issues on Galaxy SL? Or should I go for a replacement?
I just downloaded sprinkle from the market and im not having your problem. The water is the same as the Xperia one. Maybe you should ask for a replacement from Samsung? Faulty GPU maybe? You never know
BassBlaster said:
I just downloaded sprinkle from the market and im not having your problem. The water is the same as the Xperia one. Maybe you should ask for a replacement from Samsung? Faulty GPU maybe? You never know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for checking it out, can you try it maybe after playing a video or doing some gaming. As, mine also works fine after restarting the phone but after doing some work like gaming, watching videos it breaks as in the screen shot. Can you also try Paper Camera? I'll appreciate your help.
I am still covered by warranty so I may go for a replacement.
PS: I have never OC'd my phone and also tried the graphics solution mentioned in the forum (editing the egl.cfg and deleting libGLES_android.so) but no solution so far.
I tried Sprinkle too and the water is weird (to avoid misunderstandings:http://i.imgur.com/C3U1ml.jpg).
I'm using CM7, I don't know if the performance are the same as stock roms.
Anyway the Xperia neo V has an Adreno 205, which is better than our PowerVR SGX530, if I'm not wrong.
loSconosciuto said:
I tried Sprinkle too and the water is weird (to avoid misunderstandings:http://i.imgur.com/C3U1ml.jpg).
I'm using CM7, I don't know if the performance are the same as stock roms.
Anyway the Xperia neo V has an Adreno 205, which is better than our PowerVR SGX530, if I'm not wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for confirming my doubt, I guessed this could be a widespread problem. Moreover, it doesn't concern the GPU power, as a ZTE Blade with Adreno 200 runs it better and I think it's equivalent if not better to our PowerVR 530.
So, what could be causing it? Bad drivers? Does all PowerVR 530 devices face the same issue?
oh?!
mhh.. very interesting :?
The GPU isn't the best, but from missing textures in one of the benchmark apps, i'd say it's incomplete drivers.
Just for Root rom
Use root explorer .. just remove system/lib/egl/remove libGLES_android.so
Will solve graphics
RonnYap said:
Use root explorer .. just remove system/lib/egl/remove libGLES_android.so
Will solve graphics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have already mentioned in my second post, that I am using this method. AFAIK, it just gives a little boost in benchmark scores nothing else.
I was wondering if Optimus Black users also have this problem...

Intel Medfield based Lava Xolo X900

Lava has launched the Xolo X900 smartphone which also becomes the first Intel powered smartphone in the world for Rs 22,000.
The device is based on the Intel Medfield reference design and features a 1.6GHz Atom processor, a GPU clocked at 400MHz, a 4.03-inch display with a resolution of 1024×600 pixels, a 8-megapixel camera with 1080p shooting capabilities, NFC and HDMI connectivity. Intel claims the camera can take 10 pictures in under a second in full resolution in burst mode setting. Lava says the device can produce five hours of battery life with 3G browsing and can deliver 45 hours of audio and eight hours of talk time.
The device run stock Android 2.3 and will not ship with the latest version of Android Ice Cream Sandwich. For its part Lava says an OTA Ice Cream Sandwich update is in the works.
The device will be available in India on April 23 at Croma or from Xolo.in, and will hit retail chains in early May.
We are feel happy because it launched in india first
And now: why do you post in O1 forum?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Seek the signature below the line
vlt96 said:
And now: why do you post in O1 forum?
Seek the signature below the line
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude its a general thread that's why i just want to inform to every one...
Development on XOLO?
Is there anyone here developing for this device or no one has even bothered so far?
I did a YouTube battery life test on my Xolo. Set to auto brightness. Watching the 2 hour, 6 minute 2012 Google I/O took exactly 50% of the battery.
Sent from my HTC One S
I guess people would be a little bit skeptical in buying a 22k lava...
Standby time is pretty sweet. 2 days, 20 hours standby, and 2:15 of screen time.
Sent from my X900 using Tapatalk 2
The only thing is that it stuck due to brand name of mobile if it will launched with Samsung then it will grab the market rapidly !
now it's available for 17k and an ICS update is now being rolled out,wanted to buy it but it's reviews seem that camera us not upto par with say s2 but considering the pric, it's pretty good deal:thumbup:
and guys i have used it on demo at a shop its of pretty good build and there is no lava branding.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 Dev Alpha using XDA
chrissmartin said:
now it's available for 17k and an ICS update is now being rolled out,wanted to buy it but it's reviews seem that camera us not upto par with say s2 but considering the pric, it's pretty good deal:thumbup:
and guys i have used it on demo at a shop its of pretty good build and there is no lava branding.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 Dev Alpha using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the camera is so so, and although standby time was great, screen time was low(2-3 hours).
Sent from my LG-P880 using Tapatalk 2

Questions about honor 6 performance

Hey guys,
I have few questions about my honor 6's benchmark scores and usability. Would be gr8 if someone can clear my concerns out.
I am running emui 3.0 btw.
I recently ran the gfxbench 3.1 in my honor 6 l04 and found my Manhattan and t rex scores to be Lower than others using honor 6.got 6.8 and 14 in Manhattan and t rex respectively with the power saving mode in normal.and then switched to smart mode and the scores went down to 4.8 and 9.7 in both while others with honor 6 get 8.3 in Manhattan and 17 in t rex. Not sure why this is happening. Device did not seem to heat too much either,temperature was below 39.
The other thing is that I am not able to have more than 18 apps open at a time though my ram usage never touches 2 gigs..I am unable to have more than 18 apps in the task switcher whatsoever. Is this some kind of a restriction with honor 6.
And the device is not rooted.
Any insight on these two situations would be hugely appreciated.I would also like to mention that antutu,browsermark and kraken returned scores similar to others with honor 6..
Thank you.
Sent from my H60-L04 using XDA Free mobile app
Guys I also do not have the performance mode under notification panel>shortcuts..
Sent from my H60-L04 using XDA Free mobile app
I don't either have the switch in shortcuts area, though it was here before updating to emui 3.0 (ie. on 2.3).
As to your other issues, I have no idea. Maybe you could try it on the 720p mode or something, though that's just a "maybe".
Regarding this 18 tasks issue, I have never gotten myself so far as to have so many of them open at the same time because I'm too much concerned with battery life and I always close all the apps, so can't help much here too.
Update
Just tested it and it indeed doesn't display more than 18 tasks, but it does not kill the ones not shown, so it shouldn't be very troublesome in my opinion.
I read your first post again and noticed you said your antutu and other benchmarks are similar to others. This could probably prove what I said earlier about the 720p mode. The greatest impact it has is on the gpu, so it would make the scores higher for graphics heavy benchmarks, which gfxbench is one of.
Yeah,even I thought of the same with gfxbench.But all the reviews claim to have run it at 1080p.In anandtech review they have scores for 720p as well. I guess it's because we are not able to unlock the gpu core to its full clock at least within gfxbench due to the lack of performance mode. From what I've seen,gfxbench too fails to unlcok the gpu before the benchmark as evident from the difference in scores between smart and normal mode.Can you go as far to run the gfxbench on your piece and give me the scores,just to make sure what I am getting is about the same as others running emui 3.
Sent from my H60-L04 using XDA Free mobile app
Sure I can run the benchmark on my device. Just tell me which gfxbench do you use because I can see two of them in the Play store (3 and 3.1)
Thank you,I used 3.1.
Sent from my H60-L04 using XDA Free mobile app
Here's what the benchmark looks like on my Honor in 1080p mode and power saving set to "normal" (I think it's the equivalent of "ultra" from emui 2.3):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
As you can see, it performs even worse than yours. I've run the benchmark in a tpu case, it could possibly have some tiny impact on the heat dissipation and such.
I think the main reason you're seeing discrepancies between your score and that of others is the version of the benchmark. I don't recall seeing 3.1 back when I was doing such benchmarks for myself so it's got to be sort of new. You've been most probably looking at 3.0 benchmark results which contains quite a bit different benchmarks under the same names, so it can be confusing.
I tried 3.0 as well with no difference. The difference is most probably because of the lack of performance mode in 3.0
Sent from my H60-L04 using XDA Free mobile app
Even I got the same scores, I ran the benchmark multiple times and I mentioned the best score I got.
Sent from my H60-L04 using XDA Free mobile app

General Post your benchmark results

I run a few benchmarks. Quite happy with the results. I have Exynos 2200. All benchmarks were run prior to software update.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

			
				
Here are my results Exynos 8/ 128GB.
Have you changed some parameters to get these results? are you in WQHD or FHD?
Rip

			
				

			
				
Snap 8gb/128gb

			
				

			
				
My latest test.
DeHAWK said:
My latest test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you done the test inside the fridge freezer mate very nice score..

			
				
Ceza21 said:
Have you done the test inside the fridge freezer mate very nice score..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro, must say I'm very satisfied with my S22 Ultra. But we still need Samsung to do some tweeking, specially with the graphics driver. My phone doesn't even get hot during the test, so my phone can with no doubt manage a higher CPU and GPU clock freq. Hope it will happen, otherwise rooting and own build kernel.
Regards DeHAWK
DeHAWK said:
Thanks bro, must say I'm very satisfied with my S22 Ultra. But we still need Samsung to do some tweeking, specially with the graphics driver. My phone doesn't even get hot during the test, so my phone can with no doubt manage a higher CPU and GPU clock freq. Hope it will happen, otherwise rooting and own build kernel.
Regards DeHAWK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm quite happy with mine too and I 100% agree with you that the new Soc and gpu needs updated drivers and optimisation ..also thirdparty apps also need to update their apps for the brand new gpu from AMD than we will have a perfect device ....or maybe that's never gonna happen..
Exynos without new firmware
Max i can get is
820k in antutu
650 single / 3300 multi / 9000 opencl in geekbench
5050 in wild life...
Huge underperformance. I tried even fresh install today, nothing helped.
I have s22u exynos 8/128
Exynos

			
				
You can imagine I'm not amused about the results, lol.
New test with updated software fxck samsung

Categories

Resources