Related
the s7 is supposed to have shorter battery life than the s7e, but most such comparisons are done using the same chips. does anyone have experience with how these two fare, when you compare a exynos-driven s7 (which should be more power efficient?) vs a SD-driven s7e? is the difference in battery life less noticeable?
i have a s7e (sd820) that has pretty good battery life, but after a few months with fat-palming the "edge" repeatedly and finding the phablet size a bit too clumsy, i'm thinking about hopping "down" to a s7 instead. local retailers stock exynos-powered s7 vs sd820-powered s7e's
will repost this in the s7e forum as well - mods, pls let me know if this is not permitted
ngmic said:
the s7 is supposed to have shorter battery life than the s7e, but most such comparisons are done using the same chips. does anyone have experience with how these two fare, when you compare a exynos-driven s7 (which should be more power efficient?) vs a SD-driven s7e? is the difference in battery life less noticeable?
i have a s7e (sd820) that has pretty good battery life, but after a few months with fat-palming the "edge" repeatedly and finding the phablet size a bit too clumsy, i'm thinking about hopping "down" to a s7 instead. local retailers stock exynos-powered s7 vs sd820-powered s7e's
will repost this in the s7e forum as well - mods, pls let me know if this is not permitted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there is little difference between the Snapdragon and Exynos but both have their advantages and disadvantages. For example the Exynos has better cpu, has a better battery life, runs cooler, is not locked to a carrier meaning that you can use it anywhere in the world basically, hasn't got a locked bootloader which means that you can root it and install custom roms. But on the other hand the snapdragon has more radio bands so it should have better LTE and stuff like that and has a better gpu. So ultimately the choice is yours because the differences aren't that big either.
custom roms for exynos?
does that mean there will be kernel source code available for it?
tnttrx said:
custom roms for exynos?
does that mean there will be kernel source code available for it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not exactly, that's the problem. Samsung doesn't want to release the source code, so the devs have to figure it out by their own, but it is not possible with the snapdragon one because their bootloaders are locked down.
TheSproker said:
Well, there is little difference between the Snapdragon and Exynos but both have their advantages and disadvantages. For example the Exynos has better cpu, has a better battery life, runs cooler, is not locked to a carrier meaning that you can use it anywhere in the world basically, hasn't got a locked bootloader which means that you can root it and install custom roms. But on the other hand the snapdragon has more radio bands so it should have better LTE and stuff like that and has a better gpu. So ultimately the choice is yours because the differences aren't that big either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks mate. i was looking at this more from the perspective of real life battery life - if a exynos s7 has the same real life battery life as a sd820 s7e, then i'm inclined to take the former
ngmic said:
thanks mate. i was looking at this more from the perspective of real life battery life - if a exynos s7 has the same real life battery life as a sd820 s7e, then i'm inclined to take the former
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the choice is yours.
ngmic said:
thanks mate. i was looking at this more from the perspective of real life battery life - if a exynos s7 has the same real life battery life as a sd820 s7e, then i'm inclined to take the former
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a myth that Exynos S7 has better battery life than SD820 S7. They are both comparable barring any software bugs. If you read all the battery threads, you'll see that depending on software build, people will either complain that their Exynos/SD820 S7 has terrible battery drain, or fantasic SoT. Initially, SD820 looked worse because of a pretty bad software bug. Lately, it seems like Samsung may have inadvertently included that bug in the Exynos builds by mistake and fixed the SD820 as all the complains about poor battery life I see are for Exynos and no longer SD820
I have an SD820 S7 on T-Mobile, and on the PC8 update, Android System and Android OS battery drain is fixed and my SoT, standby drain rates, usage times, etc are as good as any of the best reported Exynos numbers I've seen. I've heard the Android System drain is back in the latest update, so I'm holding off on that.
As mentioned, battery life is a non-issue and shouldn't be a deciding factor. The choice should be based on if you want unlocked bootloader vs. better GPU, wifi calling, etc.
Will s8＋ have longer battery life than s7 edge?
Samsung claims the battery life will be relatively the same:
https://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s8-battery-claims/
It's kind of hard to really say if their claims will be accurate or not as there's multiple factors to consider. Firstly, the 8+ battery is 100 mAh smaller than the S7e, and it also has both a larger display, and more pixels in its display, which effects battery life dramatically. However, with a new, supposedly markedly more efficient processor, it's perfectly possible that it will be able to offset the loss of mAh and the larger display.
At very least, I think it's safe to say it will not have longer battery life than the S7e.
CConn882 said:
Samsung claims the battery life will be relatively the same:
https://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s8-battery-claims/
It's kind of hard to really say if their claims will be accurate or not as there's multiple factors to consider. Firstly, the 8+ battery is 100 mAh smaller than the S7e, and it also has both a larger display, and more pixels in its display, which effects battery life dramatically. However, with a new, supposedly markedly more efficient processor, it's perfectly possible that it will be able to offset the loss of mAh and the larger display.
At very least, I think it's safe to say it will not have longer battery life than the S7e.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a shame really, that's what we get for the current trend of slim is better. It's all about the aesthetics now...well that and the lessons learned from the Note 7 debacle. I'm sure they are nervous about making big changes in the battery department. Hopefully one of those battery breakthroughs that often get reported in the tech news see the light of day sooner rather than later.
I never get more than around 5 hours screen on time with any of the Galaxy series that I have owned. Even if I'm just doing light browsing and shut everything off lol. The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus I have now gets me 7-9 hours and that's pretty insane, even with more intensive stuff. Pity it's not that great a phone. The camera sucks compared to my old S7. Oh well, at least the battery charges fast and there is an abundance of portable battery packs these days.
i hope it's the same, because i am tired of my S6 battery life, have to charge it 2-3 times everyday
abdelha said:
i hope it's the same, because i am tired of my S6 battery life, have to charge it 2-3 times everyday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it would have lost 20-30% of its max capacity by now. That's another problem with batteries that has been going on for far too long. That's something that needs innovation and fast.
Highspeed123 said:
It's a shame really, that's what we get for the current trend of slim is better. It's all about the aesthetics now...well that and the lessons learned from the Note 7 debacle. I'm sure they are nervous about making big changes in the battery department. Hopefully one of those battery breakthroughs that often get reported in the tech news see the light of day sooner rather than later.
I never get more than around 5 hours screen on time with any of the Galaxy series that I have owned. Even if I'm just doing light browsing and shut everything off lol. The Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus I have now gets me 7-9 hours and that's pretty insane, even with more intensive stuff. Pity it's not that great a phone. The camera sucks compared to my old S7. Oh well, at least the battery charges fast and there is an abundance of portable battery packs these days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh, I think it might just be that cellphone manufactures have a mark they want to hit with battery life, and don't usually seem too interested in extending it beyond that. Every major flagship now seems to be in that 4-6 SOT range without much variance. Whether it be the iPhone, or G6, or Moto phones, they all seem to end up in that ballpark.
Personally, I get 4-5 hours of SOT with my S7 - and if I'm using my phone constantly using wi-fi, I can get get almost 6 hours of SOT under it. If the 8+ can be 15% better than that, like it should be, I'll be quite pleased.
CConn882 said:
Samsung claims the battery life will be relatively the same:
https://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-galaxy-s8-battery-claims/
It's kind of hard to really say if their claims will be accurate or not as there's multiple factors to consider. Firstly, the 8+ battery is 100 mAh smaller than the S7e, and it also has both a larger display, and more pixels in its display, which effects battery life dramatically. However, with a new, supposedly markedly more efficient processor, it's perfectly possible that it will be able to offset the loss of mAh and the larger display.
At very least, I think it's safe to say it will not have longer battery life than the S7e.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be shorter on the S8. What Samsung are not telling people is that the battery stats for the S7 were done at it's full 1440p resolution (because Nougat was not out and resolution could not be changed at that time). The S8 battery stats are done using it's "default" resolution of 1080. So the numbers are manipulated to look similar but they are not comparing the same resolution, so the S8 will last LESS than the S7 if you run it at its 1440p resolution. IMO Samsung are intentionally misleading people to hide this fact.
ewokuk said:
It will be shorter on the S8. What Samsung are not telling people is that the battery stats for the S7 were done at it's full 1440p resolution (because Nougat was not out and resolution could not be changed at that time). The S8 battery stats are done using it's "default" resolution of 1080. So the numbers are manipulated to look similar but they are not comparing the same resolution, so the S8 will last LESS than the S7 if you run it at its 1440p resolution. IMO Samsung are intentionally misleading people to hide this fact.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't create your own facts. You need to provide a credible source to back up your claims. I personally don't believe it. Same res, similar battery and a less power hungry SoC. I'm pretty sure they have been further optimising their software too (for what that's worth). I'm almost certain that the battery will be on par with last year's model. I can't see any reason why not.
Highspeed123 said:
You can't create your own facts. You need to provide a credible source to back up your claims. I personally don't believe it. Same res, similar battery and a less power hungry SoC. I'm pretty sure they have been further optimising their software too (for what that's worth). I'm almost certain that the battery will be on par with last year's model. I can't see any reason why not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly, you can't just assume that they were talking about 1080p resolution, we have to wait and see....
---------- Post added at 11:05 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:04 AM ----------
Highspeed123 said:
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it would have lost 20-30% of its max capacity by now. That's another problem with batteries that has been going on for far too long. That's something that needs innovation and fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they say that their new battery can hold 95% of its age even after two years....
Highspeed123 said:
You can't create your own facts. You need to provide a credible source to back up your claims. I personally don't believe it. Same res, similar battery and a less power hungry SoC. I'm pretty sure they have been further optimising their software too (for what that's worth). I'm almost certain that the battery will be on par with last year's model. I can't see any reason why not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Credible source? Samsung's own documentation credible enough for you? They state the "default" resolution is 1080 in the documentation. They are NOT going to state that and then provide battery stats based on 1440 are they, now THAT would be stupid.
You'll see soon enough once someone does a good test of 1440p vs s7 at 1440p and 1080p vs s7 at 1080p. Don't say you weren't warned.
Highspeed123 said:
You can't create your own facts. You need to provide a credible source to back up your claims. I personally don't believe it. Same res, similar battery and a less power hungry SoC. I'm pretty sure they have been further optimising their software too (for what that's worth). I'm almost certain that the battery will be on par with last year's model. I can't see any reason why not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I agree, I actually had the same suspicion as ewokuk.
I think it comes down to what is the default resolution the phone is shipping with.
The S8 and S8+ ship with FHD res, which is why I think their stats are for this resolution. What's the default res on the S7?
ewokuk said:
Credible source? Samsung's own documentation credible enough for you? They state the "default" resolution is 1080 in the documentation. They are NOT going to state that and then provide battery stats based on 1440 are they, now THAT would be stupid.
You'll see soon enough once someone does a good test of 1440p vs s7 at 1440p and 1080p vs s7 at 1080p. Don't say you weren't warned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are talking about things as if they are fact when in reality, you are making your own opinions.
Yes the default is 1080p so what? That just means the phone is set at FHD out of the box. Not that they did battery tests at that resolution. You need facts before telling people it's a reality. You putting two and two together is not a fact.
If you look at it from a more intelligent point of view, the battery is pretty much the same, the SoC is more battery efficient. Minus the larger screen battery drain and it should even out to be on par with the S7. What makes you think it will be worse battery life when you consider the hardware?
Mate, it'll be the same or not far off in either direction. The battery life of Samsung phones isn't great and people already know that. It's going to be average as usual. It's a pointless conversation. The phone will be bought by many regardless.
---------- Post added at 11:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:41 AM ----------
Dat Noob said:
While I agree, I actually had the same suspicion as ewokuk.
I think it comes down to what is the default resolution the phone is shipping with.
The S8 and S8+ ship with FHD res, which is why I think their stats are for this resolution. What's the default res on the S7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1080p, as introduced by Android N. It didn't start that way however as it was launched with a default of QHD. The point is, there is nothing to suggest it will have worse battery life because the hardware says otherwise. It's an opinion until we have a definitive answer through testing and reviews. I can't say it will be more or less, it's only my OPINION that it will be on par with the S7. Ewokuk is pushing his suspicion as fact so I replied. That is all.
Edit- Just want to add that changing the resolution barely makes any difference to the battery life if any. It still has a QHD screen even if you change the res. You can't change the pixel count. It's more about giving you better performance in games etc. We will have to see.
Highspeed123 said:
You are talking about things as if they are fact when in reality, you are making your own opinions.
Yes the default is 1080p so what? That just means the phone is set at FHD out of the box. Not that they did battery tests at that resolution. You need facts before telling people it's a reality. You putting two and two together is not a fact.
If you look at it from a more intelligent point of view, the battery is pretty much the same, the SoC is more battery efficient. Minus the larger screen battery drain and it should even out to be on par with the S7. What makes you think it will be worse battery life when you consider the hardware?
Mate, it'll be the same or not far off in either direction. The battery life of Samsung phones isn't great and people already know that. It's going to be average as usual. It's a pointless conversation. The phone will be bought by many regardless.
---------- Post added at 11:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:41 AM ----------
It's 1080p, as introduced by Android N. It didn't start that way however as it was launched with a default of QHD. The point is, there is nothing to suggest it will have worse battery life because the hardware says otherwise. It's an opinion until we have a definitive answer through testing and reviews. I can't say it will be more or less, it's only my OPINION that it will be on par with the S7. Ewokuk is pushing his suspicion as fact so I replied. That is all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh come now, are you seriously telling me you think they set the default resolution to 1080 and then tested and made public battery expectations based on 1440 (AND didn't bother to tell people that these were based on 1440)? Wake up man, the company isn't THAT stupid, in fact the way they have done it is quite clever (enough to fool many people clearly). It won't be long until I am proved right when the proper tests come out. :good:
As for changing the resolution not having much effect on battery, that is only the case if all you do is browse the web. At 1080p it is still lighting up the full 1440p pixels yes, but it does not have to do the increased calculations to display a sharper image. This is why a graphics card on a pc (which does work in exactly the same way) can output a higher FPS when you lower the resolution.....it has far few calculations to do......but the monitor is still using the same number of pixels. The more graphically intense your usage, the worse the battery drain will be at 1440. So that will be videos and games like you say.
ewokuk said:
Oh come now, are you seriously telling me you think they set the default resolution to 1080 and then tested and made public battery expectations based on 1440 (AND didn't bother to tell people that these were based on 1440)? Wake up man, the company isn't THAT stupid, in fact the way they have done it is quite clever (enough to fool many people clearly). It won't be long until I am proved right when the proper tests come out. :good:
As for changing the resolution not having much effect on battery, that is only the case if all you do is browse the web. At 1080p it is still lighting up the full 1440p pixels yes, but it does not have to do the increased calculations to display a sharper image. This is why a graphics card on a pc (which does work in exactly the same way) can output a higher FPS when you lower the resolution.....it has far few calculations to do......but the monitor is still using the same number of pixels. The more graphically intense your usage, the worse the battery drain will be at 1440. So that will be videos and games like you say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, I'm saying that you don't know the battery life by looking at a spec sheet and neither do I. It's your opinion vs my opinion. Neither of our opinions are facts until proven.
I know how resolution works, how hardware works and you are correct in some ways. It's just that testing on the S7, while changing resolution has proven to not make a big difference in battery life. Why that is, I don't know. Maybe it's not truly changing the res as you would when setting it on your PC. All I know is that I didn't gain much in terms of battery when I tried it
What would be causing the S8 to have inferior battery life over the S7? The hardware suggests it should be around the same, forget about resolution and look at it that way. As you say and I agree with, we will have to wait and see.
Highspeed123 said:
Nope, I'm saying that you don't know the battery life by looking at a spec sheet and neither do I. It's your opinion vs my opinion. Neither of our opinions are facts until proven.
I know how resolution works, how hardware works and you are correct in some ways. It's just that testing on the S7, while changing resolution has proven to not make a big difference in battery life. Why that is, I don't know. Maybe it's not truly changing the res as you would when setting it on your PC. All I know is that I didn't gain much in terms of battery when I tried it
What would be causing the S8 to have inferior battery life over the S7? The hardware suggests it should be around the same, forget about resolution and look at it that way. As you say and I agree with, we will have to wait and see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing I most disagree with ewok here about is how much effect the screen resolution has on battery life. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the S8 ends up having less battery life than the S7, but from what I know about phones, that will be FAR more likely due to screen size, processor, and the overall optimization of the phone than the screen resolution.
I mean, just as evidence of that, look at the Exynos and Snapdragon versions of the S7. Despite having the same screen resolution, size, etc., the Snapdragon variant of the phone ended up with poorer battery life due to poor optimization of the processor.
The 13 pro max has been getting universal accolades for its incredible SOT and 2-3 day battery life. On paper and looking at the battery specs- the new S22 Ultra with its new LTPO efficient display should wipe the floor with the 13 Pro Max.
What's everybody's expectation? Will the S22 Ultra finally close the gap and maybe even exceed it or are we doomed to constantly debloating and finding that one hidden Samsung or google feature/ app that keeps sucking the juice from our phone endlessly?
I can't wait to get my hands on my S22 Ultra. I currently have an iPhone 13 Pro Max which is awesome battery wise. I wish I could keep the iPhone for comparisons but Im using it for trade in value. I will add my notes and comparisons as soon as I have it
dj24 said:
The 13 pro max has been getting universal accolades for its 2-3 day SOT. On paper and looking at the battery specs- the new S22 Ultra with its new LTPO efficient display should wipe the floor with the 13 Pro Max.
What's everybody's expectation? Will the S22 Ultra finally close the gap and maybe even exceed it or are we doomed to constantly debloating and finding that one hidden Samsung or google feature/ app that keeps sucking the juice from our phone endlessly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, 2 to 3 day SOT? That's literally not possible.
eaoosa said:
lol, 2 to 3 day SOT? That's literally not possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. You're right. I meant 2-3 days of battery life. Edited my post.
dj24 said:
Lol. You're right. I meant 2-3 days of battery life. Edited my post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, credit where credit is due. Apple has fantastic battery life. But I'd say for most people it's around a day and a half which is still incredible. The only downside is... well its Apple and were missing out on a lot of features from the Galaxy. Looking forward to the Ultras battery review.
Reviews for the S22 Ultra are starting to trickle in and battery life is surprisingly disappointing even just comparing it to last year's S21 Ultra. Suffice to say it will not get anywhere close to the 13 Pro Max.
Galaxy S22 Ultra battery life can’t match iPhone 13 Pro Max
A Galaxy S22 Ultra battery life test shows the new Samsung flagship is no match for the iPhone 13 Pro Max - or the S21 Ultra.
bgr.com
This is truly disappointing since I remember Samsung was trolling iPhone users a few years back in their ads calling them 'wall huggers' and telling them to make the switch. How times have changed..
There is no doubt about the optimization in iPhone due to A15 chip and as some Youtubers call it, black magic on the battery by Apple, we tend to overlook the fact that iOS absolutely freezes background tasks and that's one big disadvantage when you want to upload media in the background and browse some websites. Another factor is fast charging, with the iP13PM taking almost 2 hours to charge to 100% v/s S22U taking an hour. I'd rather go with a phone that can multitask and top up faster that a restrictive and dated OS.
linom said:
There is no doubt about the optimization in iPhone due to A15 chip and as some Youtubers call it, black magic on the battery by Apple, we tend to overlook the fact that iOS absolutely freezes background tasks and that's one big disadvantage when you want to upload media in the background and browse some websites. Another factor is fast charging, with the iP13PM taking almost 2 hours to charge to 100% v/s S22U taking an hour. I'd rather go with a phone that can multitask and top up faster that a restrictive and dated OS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing that. The first one is slightly concerning especially if that's the same case for downloading and not just for uploading as well. My N20 Ultra takes about 2 hours from completely dead to full status which doesn't bother me since I prefer slow charging instead to lengthen its battery life (I know that's not really true but I've convinced myself that )
My go to source for battery life reviews is gsmarena. They're currently reviewing it and depending on the outcome I'll decide what I'll do. My order from Feb 10 still shows as pending and if the review posts first and the results are disappointing, I'll cancel my order. If it ships, I'll most likely keep it since Samsung is giving me a more than fair value for my N20 Ultra and trade it in for the hopefully notchless upcoming 14 Pro Max.
I'll let fate decide
Also bear in mind that the last Note (N20 Ultra) SD variant had almost 1 hour longer SOT/ better camera pics/ better heat management compared to its Exynos counterpart (multiple reviews confirmed this including mrwhosetheboss).
A decent custom kernel may help boost SOT/ standby time (e.g. arter97 kernel for my OnePlus 7T Pro did wonders).
Hello!
I have bought my S20+ 2 years ago and I'm thinking about upgrading to the S22 Ultra, both being Exynos variants. I usually keep my phone 2 years, but unfortunately when I bought my S20+ 4G I didn't think at the time that 5G was going to be deployed this quickly so I didn't pay extra for it.
So I'm looking for a 5G phone I could use for social media and media consumption (shows, films, YouTube), as the display is apparently good, and has good cameras. This time I'll try to go for 3 years with it, since we'll get software updates for longer.
As of today, how's the battery life on the Ultra Exynos? I've heard that some recent update improved it quite a lot. I don't play games at all on mobile or do some crazy video editing stuff, if that helps.
So, do you think it'll be a decent upgrade? Although I've never used an S-Pen, I'm confident I'll enjoy it. I'm not looking for other recommendations.
I used a s20 and upgraded to s21 ultra and now the s22 ultra. I really enjoy the phone. Everything feels and look better than the s20. For me it is a definite upgrade from the s20 to s22. The streaming stuff looks great on the display. The only issue I have is the battery life could be better. It's not bad, but not great. Heavy use I get a day of battery life, moderate use 1.5 days...sot between 4 to 6 hours...depending on usage. Battery lasts 24 to 36 hours...sound is basically same loudness as s21 and s20...quality of sounda bit better. I know some people have some issues with exonys...I have a snapdragon. There was some updates that took away a lot off the bugs. Camera and video is good...now light is a big improvement over the s20...my only real issue is fhd 60 fps videos appear very soft. 4k looks great
I would echo @termdj experience about general feel of s22u
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Would you consider the battery to be better than the S20+? I don't know if battery-wise there's a big difference between SD and Exynos.
Compared to the s20 it is better. With the same usage I got 3 to 4 hours sot and the battery lasted max 24 hours on moderate use on the s20.
Hi guys I’m looking to purchase the s22 ultra but seen an old video showing that the Exynos version was pretty bad. Apps taking longer to load and just being laggy. Is this still the case with the Exynos version or has this been fixed via updates?
Go for the Snap variant if you can.
Unfortunately it will be the Exynos as it’s an upgrade with my network. I’m guessing updates hasn’t fixed the issues?
Gamer13789 said:
Unfortunately it will be the Exynos as it’s an upgrade with my network. I’m guessing updates hasn’t fixed the issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an Exynos 2200 version for Germany (bought from Samsung directly), and I have really no complaints at all outside a small difference in installation/update times for the apps. I compared with my OPPO Find X3 Pro (PEEM00 version) and the Snapdragon 888 was doing a better job (quite surprised).
But the difference isn't that big, even if the fact that it is noticeable is already a disappointment in itself for a device that premium-priced.
If that kind of thing is bothering you too much, maybe wait a few more months and grab a S23U, if Samsung deploy the full fleet with the SDG2.
Don't make mistake , SD only. If picture quality and some of battery and overall performance is important go for SD. S22Ultra with Exynos makes sh**ty photos and in some areas performing worse than 400 EUR cheaper phones. I have Exynos and not impressed price vs benifit. Last phone that has given me most WOW was Mi 11 Ultra, Pixel 6 Pro - best camera in some scenarious.
I really hope that S23U will be SD globally and that I could get good trade in for S22U.
Two s22 ultra exynos and no complaints
Excellent photo for a smartphone that are just good for point and click
droidDHD said:
Don't make mistake , SD only. If picture quality and some of battery and overall performance is important go for SD. S22Ultra with Exynos makes sh**ty photos and in some areas performing worse than 400 EUR cheaper phones. I have Exynos and not impressed price vs benifit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot understand that extreme Exynos bashing in 2022. Side by side comparisons (that counts!) show identical battery life and round about 5% less speed for the Exynos. Similar throttling, Exy starting with few percent less power and ending with few percent more.
SnapD Pictures have in side by side comparisons a bit more saturation, but it is hard to define what is (typically) over-saturated or normal. In few details you can see a bit more noise in Exy pictures, ok, de-noising might be an issue, but in a way really affecting picture quality? Have a look into the skies of the pics, the Exy shows more details in bright clouds.
Have you checked decentered camera lenses, this is something that happens and affects the picture quality much more and not depending on the SOC.
On the other hand, the GNSS in the Exynos model can handle carrier phase and should give more accurate positioning, but I do not have direct comparison results. I would accept 5% less CPU power to get a more accurate GPS, but I would also be fine opposite. No reason for bashing.
It seems both, the SD8g1 AND the Exy2200 lack of power efficiency, which seems to be caused by the production process location. But my S22U has 6-10h of SOT (ok for me) and there is no alternative device with that functionality (for me).