Quick question, can you install AOSP Kernel to MIUI Stock ROM?
Some kernels like DPA are compatible with both MIUI and AOSP
Deadeyes2719 said:
Quick question, can you install AOSP Kernel to MIUI Stock ROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Generally, no, you can't -- unless otherwise stated by developer or tested by a significant number of users.
Related
Hi everyone,I have a sensation xe.
I flash the Bricked's kernel, because the sweep2wake is very cool.But after i flash the kernels into AOKP, everything goes well expect the wifi.I also try RCMix's kernel, and faux's kernel, but same the result.
How could i use the phone without wifi!
I need to flash a kernel for AOKP with a feature like sweep2wake, and the wifi should be work.Can someone help me?
English is not very well, but i try my best to write these
I believe Faux has an AOSP kernel. The ones you tried are Sense based, which is the problem.
Sent from my Sensational Sachiel.
l2icky said:
I believe Faux has an AOSP kernel. The ones you tried are Sense based, which is the problem.
Sent from my Sensational Sachiel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot！I have found Faux's AOSP kernel and the wifi worked althought without sweep2wake. The only way is to way the new version.
vince.liu said:
Thanks a lot！I have found Faux's AOSP kernel and the wifi worked althought without sweep2wake. The only way is to way the new version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know Faux put Sweep2Wake in his Sense versions. I am spoiled with it as well, you might shoot him a message or post in the thread and ask if a future release for AOSP will have Sweep2Wake.
suggestion, I'm on aokp since build 32...don't use custom kernels, is better with the stock one...more stable...I use it at 1ghz and is ****in' great! no lags at all, even gaming
there is no sweep2wake kernel for aosp at the moment, just wait
throcker said:
suggestion, I'm on aokp since build 32...don't use custom kernels, is better with the stock one...more stable...I use it at 1ghz and is ****in' great! no lags at all, even gaming
there is no sweep2wake kernel for aosp at the moment, just wait
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or make it yourself based on the sources that do have it
Sent from my HTC Sensation using XDA
throcker said:
suggestion, I'm on aokp since build 32...don't use custom kernels, is better with the stock one...more stable...I use it at 1ghz and is ****in' great! no lags at all, even gaming
there is no sweep2wake kernel for aosp at the moment, just wait
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right.
im really new at all this stuff, and if that not work, can you recommed on another good kernel that will wotk with mahdi rom?
tx for help
harel013 said:
im really new at all this stuff, and if that not work, can you recommed on another good kernel that will wotk with mahdi rom?
tx for help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco should work with all Stock and AOSP roms
rootSU said:
Franco should work with all Stock and AOSP roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea but here in the therd "http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/orig-development/kernel-franco-kernel-r53-t2508284"
he write there that "Currently does not work with recent CyanogenMod nightlies or any rom has uses CM sources as a base because they made underlying changes that are now incompatible with Kernels that don't follow their path."
and i've been told that nahdi rom use CM?
this the rom page: http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-mahdi-rom-2-6-t2540455
ty
harel013 said:
yea but here in the therd "http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/orig-development/kernel-franco-kernel-r53-t2508284"
he write there that "Currently does not work with recent CyanogenMod nightlies or any rom has uses CM sources as a base because they made underlying changes that are now incompatible with Kernels that don't follow their path."
and i've been told that nahdi rom use CM?
this the rom page: http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-mahdi-rom-2-6-t2540455
ty
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, CM based roms need CAF kernels. There are 2 types of kernel for the N5
Stock/AOSP (example, Franco)
CM/CAF (example Chaos)
They are not interchangeable.
Mahdi is an AOSP ROM
rootSU said:
Correct, CM based roms need CAF kernels. There are 2 types of kernel for the N5
Stock/AOSP (example, Franco)
CM/CAF (example Chaos)
They are not interchangeable.
Mahdi is an AOSP ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you very much for your fast help and your patience ! very help to me!! :good:
No probs.
rootSU said:
No probs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does CAF stand for?
Sandman-007 said:
What does CAF stand for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.codeaurora.org/about-us/community
Is Mahdi-Rom AOSP or CM (CAF) based?
I've been researching of this for the whole night last night but keep on finding mixed answer.
and now I'm hoping for you guys to answer me...i wanted to install elemental x but don't know which version to install aosp or cm
and will franco kernel be comparable since its for aosp?
Thanks soooo much to who ever answer this...!
matthewle96 said:
Is Mahdi-Rom AOSP or CM (CAF) based?
I've been researching of this for the whole night last night but keep on finding mixed answer.
and now I'm hoping for you guys to answer me...i wanted to install elemental x but don't know which version to install aosp or cm
and will franco kernel be comparable since its for aosp?
Thanks soooo much to who ever answer this...!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its AOSP with CAF stuff in it. Just flash one and if it doesn't boot reflash the ROM and flash the other.
Thanks
Lethargy said:
Its AOSP with CAF stuff in it. Just flash one and if it doesn't boot reflash the ROM and flash the other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so just to make sure that franco is FULLY comparable with this rom?
matthewle96 said:
so just to make sure that franco is FULLY comparable with this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make a backup, flash. If it doesn't boot then it isn't compatible.
matthewle96 said:
so just to make sure that franco is FULLY comparable with this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make a backup in recovery and just flash the darn kernel. if its not compatible, it wont boot. then you can either flash a known booting kernel or restore the backup you made in recovery. that's the quickest way to find your answer.
simms22 said:
make a backup in recovery and just flash the darn kernel. if its not compatible, it wont boot. then you can either flash a known booting kernel or restore the backup you made in recovery. that's the quickest way to find your answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks
Haha this really is a good question though. I myself didn't know either. I had been under the impression it was full AOSP.
Last time I ran Franco kernel on it though all was fine.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5
TheLastSidekick said:
Haha this really is a good question though. I myself didn't know either. I had been under the impression it was full AOSP.
Last time I ran Franco kernel on it though all was fine.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quite a few ROMs say AOSP but have CAF parts lol. Rarely are ROMs full CAF though, the only one that I know of is CM of course. Some AOSP kernels work with hybrids and some only do after modification.
An AOSP Dalvik will only boot up on full AOSP ROMs so it the Z2 Dalvik boots, it's full AOSP. If a CAF Dalvik boots, it's either hybrid or full. Nice way to tell
Lethargy said:
Quite a few ROMs say AOSP but have CAF parts lol. Rarely are ROMs full CAF though, the only one that I know of is CM of course. Some AOSP kernels work with hybrids and some only do after modification.
An AOSP Dalvik will only boot up on full AOSP ROMs so it the Z2 Dalvik boots, it's full AOSP. If a CAF Dalvik boots, it's either hybrid or full. Nice way to tell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah thanks. I never really messed with the custom dalvik because I didn't see anything other benchmark gains.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5
TheLastSidekick said:
Ah thanks. I never really messed with the custom dalvik because I didn't see anything other benchmark gains.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people say general usage is slightly better, some say it doesn't help in general ui. Experience varies. Lol.
I ran mahdi rom for a long time use aosp kernel caf will not boot
Franco Kernel on OPO?
Any update on whether Franco Kernel is compatible with this CM based Mahdi rom on the OnePlus One?
It's been a solid year since I've updated my tab 10.1's rom, and it's slowed down a bit (mainly because of RAM), so I wanted to ask the community should I update from CM13?
I'm looking for a rom with these qualities:
- Android 6.0+
- Themes
- Fast and light
- Can be OC'd
- Compatible w/ Xposed
safwanz1 said:
It's been a solid year since I've updated my tab 10.1's rom, and it's slowed down a bit (mainly because of RAM), so I wanted to ask the community should I update from CM13?
I'm looking for a rom with these qualities:
- Android 6.0+
- Themes
- Fast and light
- Can be OC'd
- Compatible w/ Xposed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go for Lineage OS 13.0 but it is not over clocked
shafa.musraf said:
You can go for Lineage OS 13.0 but it is not over clocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking is needed imo on the Tab 2
safwanz1 said:
Overclocking is needed imo on the Tab 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know over clocked kernel is available or not. You want performance?
shafa.musraf said:
I don't know over clocked kernel is available or not. You want performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah
Custom kernels aren't supported anymore, meaning oc kernels like dhollmen won't work with newer roms. You'll need to get an older rom but it won't have security updates or better optimization on the tab
safwanz1 said:
Yeah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want best performance. Try KitKat ROM. I am using CM 11 since 2 months performance is pretty good
shafa.musraf said:
If you want best performance. Try KitKat ROM. I am using CM 11 since 2 months performance is pretty good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kitkat is a bit too old to run for me
Lightracer said:
Custom kernels aren't supported anymore, meaning oc kernels like dhollmen won't work with newer roms. You'll need to get an older rom but it won't have security updates or better optimization on the tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh thanks for the heads up, guess best option is to factory reset
safwanz1 said:
Kitkat is a bit too old to run for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Than try Lineage OS 13 or UA 6.0
shafa.musraf said:
Than try Lineage OS 13 or UA 6.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it have themes and OC?
safwanz1 said:
Does it have themes and OC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no working OC Kernel anymore.
You can use some 2 years old device specific builds with old OC Kernel only.
UA doesn't have a theme manager - it's almost pure AOSP and won't have any extras added in future (maybe an integrated Updater only).
Android-Andi said:
There is no working OC Kernel anymore.
You can use some 2 years old device specific builds with old OC Kernel only.
UA doesn't have a theme manager - it's almost pure AOSP and won't have any extras added in future (maybe an integrated Updater only).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, so how's performance on Lineage?
safwanz1 said:
Oh, so how's performance on Lineage?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on your needs. Install twrp, make a backup of current rom and test yourself
Fyi:
https://twrp.me/faq/backupexclusions.html
Is there a dev willing to make custom kernels for AOSP Android 10 ROMS?
pat_pxt07 said:
Is there a dev willing to make custom kernels for AOSP Android 10 ROMS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The default one is already optimized. Why must a custom one? I already tried one before and the performance is pretty much the same.
Andhika24kd said:
The default one is already optimized. Why must a custom one? I already tried one before and the performance is pretty much the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just wanted the Kcal feature