Device info HW+ app is showing that soc of my POCO X3 NFC 6/128 is 730
Wasn't it 732G?
Anyone please check your snapdragon version with this app
Please.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ru.andr7e.deviceinfohw
irfanilyas991 said:
Anyone please check your snapdragon version with this app
Please.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ru.andr7e.deviceinfohw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm strange iv just read too that it was 732 but mine says 730 too
May be the app is not updated and doesn't have the 732G codes. 732G is rather new.
Moreover this phone is giving the benchmark score of 730 which is 27 lac something
732G gives 31 lac+ score.
Someone please confirm the SoC used in this phone.
I checked using CPU-Z it shows SDMMAGPIE which is actually the codename for Snapdragon 730. On AIDA-64 it also shows Snapdragon 730 (SM7150). It's weird, but the GPU is correct, Adreno 618.
It should be confirmed from official support
732 it almost same as 730 but 732 its 2.3 ghz so
it shchold be 732 in poco
730g and 732g are practically the same soc, and the 732 is brand new, the majority of the apps can't recognise it simply because they are not updated to recognise it.
I mailed the developer of this app, he uploaded the beta version. Now its showing 732G
730G and 732G are variants of the 730 SOC.
The only difference is the clock frequency - 2.200 MHz at the 730G and 2.300 MHz at the 732G.
Related
Afaik honor 8 have kirin 950..
Checked with cpuz mine shown kirin 955..
Does anyone have same soc as mine or I have fake one...
Bought it from bestbuy.
no it's not fake, newer honor 8 or some new variant does have 955.
Mine says 955 as well. I ain't mad if that's the case. Slightly better processor
Most reviews and spec sheets for the Honor 8 list the CPU as a Kirin 950/955 because of the fact that more recent production runs are using the 955 instead of the 950. Other than the slight performance boost, the 955 shouldn't be significantly different from the 950 though...
settings-about phone. Mine is 950. In cpuz, it stated 955.
My about phone in settings say 950 but cpu-z says 955, not sure which is correct?
Edit: i downloaded 5 others and the ones with the z say 955 and the ones with x say 950, so i think i will just trust the about phone in settings
Same here! Settings 950 and CPU-Z says 955. Thats strange :victory:
Sent from my Honor 8 using XDA Labs
Mine says the same.... Settings 950, CPUz 955...
To be fair the 950 is just an underclocked 955.. Why change processor as a whole for 0.2 GHz less?
So...can we overclock it?
I own pocophone f1 and i love it . And i always say i will buy f2 when he come out . But 730 g why go down ? 845 is way better
its the new chipset like xiaomi note 10
ChipsetQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm)
Because chipset 730 is newest chipset for a gaming experience and battery life better. sorry for my bad english.
Yes but its not better ?
Why do you ask us?
Ask them: https://www.mi.com/global/support/contact
Flockrock said:
Why do you ask us?
Ask them: https://www.mi.com/global/support/contact
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i ask becose its "xiaomi poco 2 questions answers" i think i didnt do some bad thing becouse i ask .
vislavskid said:
Well i ask becose its "xiaomi poco 2 questions answers" i think i didnt do some bad thing becouse i ask .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rather discussion.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-5/how-to/message-moderators-users-please-read-t3503775
Just think for once.
Why should they bring another phone with an two years old 845, when they already have?
If they would go with the 855, why should they? They already offer more than enough phones with 855.
If they would go with the 865, can they keep the low price? Also they release plenty of other phones with 865, why another one?
And why would you buy a X2 with 845, if you already have a F1 with 845?
Why don't you just consider buying one with the 855 or 865 if you care so much about performance?
Flockrock said:
Rather discussion.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-5/how-to/message-moderators-users-please-read-t3503775
Just think for once.
Why should they bring another phone with an two years old 845, when they already have?
If they would go with the 855, why should they? They already offer more than enough phones with 855.
If they would go with the 865, can they keep the low price? Also they release plenty of other phones with 865, why another one?
And why would you buy a X2 with 845, if you already have a F1 with 845?
Why don't you just consider buying one with the 855 or 865 if you care so much about performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No comment
I agree, 730g would be a let down in terms of performance, 845 can still beat 730g in gaming department. I'm also worried how 730g will handle 120 frames every second, even if it's new it's still not upto 800 series. Poco F1 was success because they provided a flagship processor at midrange price but now 730g a mid range processor at mid range price with 120hz screen gimmick, not very exciting.
Manish355 said:
I agree, 730g would be a let down in terms of performance, 845 can still beat 730g in gaming department. I'm also worried how 730g will handle 120 frames every second, even if it's new it's still not upto 800 series. Poco F1 was success because they provided a flagship processor at midrange price but now 730g a mid range processor at mid range price with 120hz screen gimmick, not very exciting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poco x2 its not poco f2 becouse off that .I was think the same but then i seen on xiaomi website that is only name for global version . K30 or global poco x2 . Pocophone f2 will be like poco f1 great with top specs. Sry for bad english
Poco X2 =/= Poco F1's successor = Poco F2. You are in the wrong forum.
And to the person above, 730G is perfectly capable of handling 120Hz. Nor it's a "gimmic". The difference is eminent.
Using Oneplus 6 (SD845) alongside with K30. I feel no apparant difference in terms of performance.
According to antutu scores Snapdragon 730G score is 40K lesser than the SD 845 and 100K lesser than the SD 855.
Does anyone know about the benchmark of this chipset?
Pankajghosh said:
Does anyone know about the benchmark of this chipset?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The antutu benchmarks score for this chipset is 259109.
Antutu is irrelevant of real life performance. Anything from 730G and up is descent performance nowdays even for a mobile gamer. Hardcore gamers will opt for a gaming mobile as the Black Shark or the ROG phone
Stonejacob said:
The antutu benchmarks score for this chipset is 259109.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
730G and SD675 both is doing well
A Poco with 865 is very hard to happen, because the 865 cpu + modem alone cost $100+. F1 have 845 because Qualcomm discount it, but 855 and 855+ haven't had any.
Aside from this, X2 is basically a rebranded K30, so can the K30 use the same rom as X2? Have anyone tried?
Snapdragon 730G has Kryo 470 CPU - 2 Powerful Cortex-A76 cores and 6 Efficiency Cortex-A55 cores with a clock speed of 2.2GHz and 1.8GHz
Snapdragon 845 has a Kryo 385 - 4 powerful Cortex-A75 cores at 2.8GHz and 4 efficiency cores at 1.8GHz
Snapdragon 730G have some of the Elite Gaming features like Anti Cheat Extensions, Junk Reducer, and HDR Gaming is added to Snapdragon 730G. Snapdragon 845 doesn’t have the Elite Gaming features.
730G has Qualcomm’s 4th Gen AI Engine. It has Hexagon Vector Extensions as well as Hexagon Tensor Accelerator
845 Qualcomm 3rd generation AI Engine. It only has a Hexagon Vector Accelerator.
730G is being an SoC of the newer generation and hence has better innovative things like the AI department.
Honestly here in Pakistan we actually don't care much about Poco X2. Xiaomi already launched MI 9T Pro at the same price they launched Poco F1 for around 369 USD. For the time being my Poco F1 will still last at least another year and after that i will think about upgrading to another phone but will definitely be from Xiaomi.
---------- Post added at 09:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------
BasantSinha said:
Snapdragon 730G has Kryo 470 CPU - 2 Powerful Cortex-A76 cores and 6 Efficiency Cortex-A55 cores with a clock speed of 2.2GHz and 1.8GHz
Snapdragon 845 has a Kryo 385 - 4 powerful Cortex-A75 cores at 2.8GHz and 4 efficiency cores at 1.8GHz
Snapdragon 730G have some of the Elite Gaming features like Anti Cheat Extensions, Junk Reducer, and HDR Gaming is added to Snapdragon 730G. Snapdragon 845 doesn’t have the Elite Gaming features.
730G has Qualcomm’s 4th Gen AI Engine. It has Hexagon Vector Extensions as well as Hexagon Tensor Accelerator
845 Qualcomm 3rd generation AI Engine. It only has a Hexagon Vector Accelerator.
730G is being an SoC of the newer generation and hence has better innovative things like the AI department.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No matter what they include. You have to accept that SD 730G just can't beat SD 845 in terms of performance.
Hi
I saw many site stating it running on 855+ but when i run cpu-z it show 855 and SM-8150
is there a variant of Z Flip running 855 instead of 855+?
Strange..
Lazy copied from elsewhere: Snapdragon 855 Plus is just the overclocked version of 855. Model number is exactly the same. If it's showing cpu at 2.96GHz it's the Plus, if it's 2.84GHz it's the regular variant. That's the only difference.
There is a list of compatible phones on their websites. On one hand that sounds logical, that some phones aren't compatible. But what I don't understand is that the physical chips all come from the same place. Right? I mean, you have different chipsets and so on, but if one phone had a, say for example, a Qualcomm SDM660 chipset. Wouldn't all the phones with that chipset be compatible?
Maybe some of the features wouldn't work, because there's no drivers for the specific subtleties in the way Sony or Xaomi implemented the chipset, but I'm just wondering why it wouldn't work otherwise?
anyone know?
For example: https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=9410&idPhone2=9058
OSAndroid 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie)Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, Android OneChipsetQualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm)Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm)CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)GPUAdreno 512Adreno 512
Both the Zenfone Max Pro M2 and 7 plus have the same chipset, cpu, and gpu. But only the Zenfone is on the compatible list. This does not make any sense.
Here
(with the ugliest back ever seen... Xiaomi, what did you smoke, this year ??? )
Post cleaned.
Thread cleaned.
Please show respect to each other. If there is a post that breaks our rules, then report it and don't respond to it. If a post doesn't break the rules, you may use the forum's ability to add a user to your ignore list.
Thank you.
If the values from Nanoreview are correct, then that would indeed be quite a downgrade in terms of the CPU/GPU. The only plus points of the device would probably be the OLED display and the 5G support.
Snapdragon 860 vs Snapdragon 695: tests and benchmarks
We put Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 against Snapdragon 695 to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and games.
nanoreview.net
thorin0815 said:
If the values from Nanoreview are correct, then that would indeed be quite a downgrade in terms of the CPU/GPU. The only plus points of the device would probably be the OLED display and the 5G support.
Snapdragon 860 vs Snapdragon 695: tests and benchmarks
We put Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 against Snapdragon 695 to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and games.
nanoreview.net
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from adreno 640 to 619 ... this is definitely a mess in downgrade never seen before !
Good IPS LCDs (like the one from POCO X3 & Pro) are still a good value over the new oled panels with their higher nits (= battery killer)
more explanation = here
I mean yeah they could have done something better, but at least they didn't go for a mediatek. SD 870, dimenisty 1100, 1200 have already been used, so yeah I'm not sure what the perfect Soc could have been.
AmmarHaseeb said:
I mean yeah they could have done something better, but at least they didn't go for a mediatek. SD 870, dimenisty 1100, 1200 have already been used, so yeah I'm not sure what the perfect Soc could have been.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(the storage is only ufs 2.2)
i think this time the name should be : POCO X4 Lite
Yes, it seem like a huge downgrade and seeing how it stat 5g, it might be that the 5g component cost a lot.
I just notice that the spec is similar to redmi note 11 pro 5G......
so is just a rebrand of it...
@[email protected]
Lol call it the x4 and call it a day
AmmarHaseeb said:
Lol call it the x4 and call it a day
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, even the X4 NFC has better CPU performance with a MTK CPU.
Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 920: tests and benchmarks
We put Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 against MediaTek Dimensity 920 to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and games.
nanoreview.net
Uhmm I better take Panadol before it gets worse