Database Info

Antutu 4 scores

Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?

tclocki said:
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want high Antutu 4 scores, just install the AOSP 4.3 rom in the original development section. Got 29k+ with it. The 3D score got a significant boost at least.

I'm not really into getting high antutu scores I'm just relieved that it looks like the boost mode has been turned off in this antutu version because as I said htc one, the lte s4, and the exynos s4 now have very close scores.
I'm still enjoying the stock touchwiz features so I don't think I'll be using the AOSP rom anytime soon. Thanks for the info btw, appreciate it!

I've noticed higher scores on the note 2 since the recent Antutu 4 update, which is nice I think they were underscoring the note 2 in hopes that you would sell the N2 and buy a new s4. Just my 2 cents though.

My I9500 gets 27017, also on stock TW and no root:
A few more runs and I'm sure it can hit 28000.

GT-I9500

GT-I9505G, running stock and rooted 4.3

Yo with my settings which is I clocked to 2052mhz and other various settings and my score was
28979
I freaked out when I saw it, by the way I do not know why it shows 2322mhz I think because thats the max Ktoonez kernel allows you to clock it, there is no way the phone will allow me to clock it at that and run antutu it will shutdown I have tried it dont you worry lol.
Anyway this is a MASSIVE boost for i9505 my max before on old antutu was 26768 and this was Extremely tweaked, now its just a few tweaks with the kernel, and done.
I also still am on old firmware I havent updated for over 1 month.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app

Here is mine running on MIUI 4.2.2:
Sent from my GT-I9505 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

DELETE

stock not rooted 4.2.2 :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9505

Mine 28532 with:
GPU OC to 450Mhz
CPU OC to 2100Mhz
(Faux Kernel + GE 4.3 slim)

I get 2700-2800 in antutu on my i9505 running stock Clock speeds and bioshock kernel on 4.2.2 TW. Guess we officially beat the i9500 now. XD

hi , how do you have scores as high ??? , me I have 22257pts on WanamLite 1.5 and the last AdamKernel
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk 4

krz_ayman said:
hi , how do you have scores as high ??? , me I have 22257pts on WanamLite 1.5 and the last AdamKernel
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't give a damn about it. Antutu is meaningless and worthless as hell. But yeah, Adam has lower score than stock, not sure what's the reason. You can flash stock if you wanna see a high score. Also another very important factor is device temp and also ambient temp. I live in India, and average room temp is ~29-30°C here, and my score on stock kernel variate's between 25500-27800. People in colder temperature will get higher scores definitely. You might wanna run it after the phone had some rest (at least half an hour), that'd make a difference.

tclocki said:
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Scored 28007 on my i9505.
Weird that the i9500 is scoring so low.

We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.

POLO_i780 said:
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right you're.. if we have 4.3 soon then I doubt i9505 would beat us.. and obviously if we overclock cpu and gpu that as much as devilpera64 have i9500 will beat the **** out of other phones. Just you wait till october and I assure you. I9505 will be behind us.

POLO_i780 said:
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing odd. Antutu is acquired by Xiaomi last month, and next thing I dont need to say... It's no longer a valid benchmark
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app

GUYS WHATEVER YOU DO DONT USE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL BENCHMARK.
THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH IT. ME AND MY BROTHER HAVE IDENTICAL GT I9500s
I RAN THE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL FULL TEST AND MY PHONE CRASHED. IT WASNT BOOTING UP FOR ALMOST 15 MINUTES. BUT LATER IT BOOTED. IT WASNT OVERCLOCKED NEITHER WAS MY BROTHERS PHONE. NOW HE UNDERCLOCKED BOTH GPU AND CPU AND DID THE SAME. SAME THING HAPPENED TO HIM.
WHATEVER YOU DO DONT JUST USE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL.
I admit gt i9500 has low score in antutu thats why I went to test with quadrant professional.

Best 5.1.1 firmeware

Are there any difference beetwen firmwares for lg flex 2, i have v15a-eur-xx and i got only 50000 on antutu, and battery is not good like as others.
Sorry on my eanglish
Also is there root methode for 5.1.1

Good question..
I have v15a EUR version and high scores in antutu and other benchmarks - ant is 57000 etc.
Battery life is good but could be better I think.
How do other versions perform?
Sent from my LG-H955 using XDA Free mobile app

I'm getting between 52000 and 47000 in the sprint version.

simon21 said:
I'm getting between 52000 and 47000 in the sprint version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
47-52000 is very low for this device.
maybe you tried the 32bit version of antutu . try to activate the 64 bit testing.
indeed the 32bit testing of antutu has maximum of 52000 in our device.
64 bit testing max is 59000

Useless thread.

I'm getting anywhere between 55,000 and 57,000 and good battery life. Took the phone off the charger at 11am and didnt hit 10 percent until 3am. Bluetooth is always on since its connected to the LG Urbane. I seldom run off of WiFi. I do have the sprint model

5.1.1 performance worse than stock 5.0.2?

Hi
When I purchased my S6 it was on 5.0.2 and I got a geekbench 3 score above 1450 in single core and above 5000 in multiple core, multiple review sites did as well.
However now on 5.1.1 I never get that score any more and the scores on geekbench 3 website for S6 have been dropping, check this link.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/android-benchmarks
For example now I always get below 1300 in single core.
Can you install geekbench 3 from Playstore and report back score and Android version
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...lay&pcampaignid=APPU_1_44q-VZCZFMe6ggTgsInoDA
Thanks

cazrack said:
Hi
When I purchased my S6 it was on 5.0.2 and I got a geekbench 3 score above 1450 in single core and above 5000 in multiple core, multiple review sites did as well.
However now on 5.1.1 I never get that score any more and the scores on geekbench 3 website for S6 have been dropping, check this link.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/android-benchmarks
For example now I always get below 1300 in single core.
Can you install geekbench 3 from Playstore and report back score and Android version
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...lay&pcampaignid=APPU_1_44q-VZCZFMe6ggTgsInoDA
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well 1502 single-core and 5164 multi-core.

Faspaiso said:
Well 1502 single-core and 5164 multi-core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
intresting, kernel?

Just enjoy your S6. Its currently the fastest Android smartphone. You probably won't notice the difference in benchmark speeds in real life usage. 5.1.1 is still more stable than 5.0.2.

cazrack said:
intresting, kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simplkernel

Faspaiso said:
Well 1502 single-core and 5164 multi-core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uninstalled Geekbench 3, reinstalled it, fixed it.
I noticed in you're screenshot that it says: AArch64
I didn't have such a line of text at all when I got my poor score results which leed me to belive that geekbench 3 was running old school Android 32 bit instead of 64 bit.
Works good now, thanks for helping.

Xiaomi Mi4c 2GB RAM vs. Xiaomi Mi4c 3GB RAM - Antutu, Geekbench, Quadrant

Test between Xiaomi Mi4c with 2GB RAM and Xiaomi Mi4c with 3GB RAM.
youtube.com/watch?v=kBSpTdes_c4

Thanks for this one!
It's really minimal difference between the two, despite 1GB difference in RAM. I just wish there was a SD-card slot in the device, as the 16GB variant is pretty much just as good as the 32GB version.. But as it is right now, you kinda have to buy the 32GB variant, in order to not run out of space

Antutu from my 3gb mi4c

kelkelkel said:
Antutu from my 3gb mi4c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
interesting... so I flashed the weekly xiaomi.eu ROM from http://xiaomi.eu/community/threads/5-10-8.28692/, and the Antutu score took a massive hit, as compared to my previous test with default MIUI7 stable ROM!
However, xiaomi.eu ROM is debloated and Play store runs seamlessly....

kelkelkel said:
interesting... so I flashed the weekly xiaomi.eu ROM from http://xiaomi.eu/community/threads/5-10-8.28692/, and the Antutu score took a massive hit, as compared to my previous test with default MIUI7 stable ROM!
However, xiaomi.eu ROM is debloated and Play store runs seamlessly....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you feel an actual slowness in the user interface, left the benchmark alone?

Giocarro said:
Do you feel an actual slowness in the user interface, left the benchmark alone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
after 4 hrs of use, two notable differences:
1) double-tap to wake much less responsive (need power button to wake);
2) animation between apps are sometimes laggy
host of problems being reported here: http://www.miui.com/thread-2996595-1-1.html
chinese dev version 5.10.8 recorded a high Antutu score http://www.miui.com/thread-2996596-1-1.html
---------- Post added at 03:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:54 PM ----------
kelkelkel said:
after 4 hrs of use, two notable differences:
1) double-tap to wake much less responsive (need power button to wake);
2) animation between apps are sometimes laggy
host of problems being reported here: http://www.miui.com/thread-2996595-1-1.html
chinese dev version 5.10.8 recorded a high Antutu score http://www.miui.com/thread-2996596-1-1.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, china dev version is 5.10.9

I can't explain why Xiaomy.eu release is slower than Xiaomi.com stock ROM; I mean, as far as I know they perform some actions to *optimize* and debloat the ROM, so the result should be the opposite.
Let's hope it will be sorted out with next week's release; for what I read it looks that Xiaomi.eu ROM should fit better non-chinese people.

kelkelkel said:
after 4 hrs of use, two notable differences:
1) double-tap to wake much less responsive (need power button to wake);
2) animation between apps are sometimes laggy
host of problems being reported here: http://www.miui.com/thread-2996595-1-1.html
chinese dev version 5.10.8 recorded a high Antutu score http://www.miui.com/thread-2996596-1-1.html
---------- Post added at 03:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:54 PM ----------
sorry, china dev version is 5.10.9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should report your performance degradation to xiaomi.eu, maybe they can do something about it who knows. Those bugs reported in those forums do make me want to hold off a bit on getting this phone..
Sent from my MI PAD using Tapatalk

I am using China Developer ROM 5.10.8. You must be using the Balance profile for that Antutu score. Once you selected "Performance", you should hit 50k or more. My Antutu:

I can't find Performance mode on my mi4c with 3gb ram. It is on latest stable.
Sent from my Mi-4c using Tapatalk

NLAung said:
I can't find Performance mode on my mi4c with 3gb ram. It is on latest stable.
Sent from my Mi-4c using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone found a solution:
http://en.miui.com/thread-178939-1-1.html

guys...if someone has the 2 gb version can he answer me how much ram is free from 2 gb in every day use??
Thank you in advance(i am between 2gb version and redmi note 2....but i like the smaller screen more...)

I own one and my free RAM is always between 800Mb and 900Mb, never less... When clening it gets 1/1.1Gb free... I clean it all the time so I get 1gb most of the time...

siul_lasc said:
I own one and my free RAM is always between 800Mb and 900Mb, never less... When clening it gets 1/1.1Gb free... I clean it all the time so I get 1gb most of the time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it rooted?

Yep... I installed the pre-rooted dev miui version... But must warn you... Cm 12.1 or Mokee make the phone much faster... The biggest diferente to me in speed is downloads... Lightning fast...

Really no big difference to me. Currently on 2GB version.

Its something people give too much care... If its because of the storage then OK... 32g is twice the 16g version. But regarding the RAM... The 2gb version does exactly the same performance as the 3gb... If you dont need 32 GB... Then stick with the 2gb RAM version... And save money for the same performance....

mine with 3gd ram does only 44k points, why?

What ROM are you using?

Mine does 61885 with xiaomi.eu 5.11.26 beta

After october update

Hello fellas.
got the N985f as you know it's loaded with the Exynos 990.
Need to ask if anybody did benchmark his device after the (ATJ1) Update.
Cuz I just did and the results aren't good.
isn't the single-core score should be around 9xx?

thebiggboss180 said:
Hello fellas.
got the N985f as you know it's loaded with the Exynos 990.
Need to ask if anybody did benchmark his device after the (ATJ1) Update.
Cuz I just did and the results aren't good.
isn't the single-core score should be around 9xx?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Geekbench 5 single core score is around 9xx, don't know about Antutu