Database Info

Antutu 4 scores

Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?

tclocki said:
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want high Antutu 4 scores, just install the AOSP 4.3 rom in the original development section. Got 29k+ with it. The 3D score got a significant boost at least.

I'm not really into getting high antutu scores I'm just relieved that it looks like the boost mode has been turned off in this antutu version because as I said htc one, the lte s4, and the exynos s4 now have very close scores.
I'm still enjoying the stock touchwiz features so I don't think I'll be using the AOSP rom anytime soon. Thanks for the info btw, appreciate it!

I've noticed higher scores on the note 2 since the recent Antutu 4 update, which is nice I think they were underscoring the note 2 in hopes that you would sell the N2 and buy a new s4. Just my 2 cents though.

My I9500 gets 27017, also on stock TW and no root:
A few more runs and I'm sure it can hit 28000.

GT-I9500

GT-I9505G, running stock and rooted 4.3

Yo with my settings which is I clocked to 2052mhz and other various settings and my score was
28979
I freaked out when I saw it, by the way I do not know why it shows 2322mhz I think because thats the max Ktoonez kernel allows you to clock it, there is no way the phone will allow me to clock it at that and run antutu it will shutdown I have tried it dont you worry lol.
Anyway this is a MASSIVE boost for i9505 my max before on old antutu was 26768 and this was Extremely tweaked, now its just a few tweaks with the kernel, and done.
I also still am on old firmware I havent updated for over 1 month.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app

Here is mine running on MIUI 4.2.2:
Sent from my GT-I9505 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

DELETE

stock not rooted 4.2.2 :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9505

Mine 28532 with:
GPU OC to 450Mhz
CPU OC to 2100Mhz
(Faux Kernel + GE 4.3 slim)

I get 2700-2800 in antutu on my i9505 running stock Clock speeds and bioshock kernel on 4.2.2 TW. Guess we officially beat the i9500 now. XD

hi , how do you have scores as high ??? , me I have 22257pts on WanamLite 1.5 and the last AdamKernel
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk 4

krz_ayman said:
hi , how do you have scores as high ??? , me I have 22257pts on WanamLite 1.5 and the last AdamKernel
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't give a damn about it. Antutu is meaningless and worthless as hell. But yeah, Adam has lower score than stock, not sure what's the reason. You can flash stock if you wanna see a high score. Also another very important factor is device temp and also ambient temp. I live in India, and average room temp is ~29-30°C here, and my score on stock kernel variate's between 25500-27800. People in colder temperature will get higher scores definitely. You might wanna run it after the phone had some rest (at least half an hour), that'd make a difference.

tclocki said:
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Scored 28007 on my i9505.
Weird that the i9500 is scoring so low.

We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.

POLO_i780 said:
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right you're.. if we have 4.3 soon then I doubt i9505 would beat us.. and obviously if we overclock cpu and gpu that as much as devilpera64 have i9500 will beat the **** out of other phones. Just you wait till october and I assure you. I9505 will be behind us.

POLO_i780 said:
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing odd. Antutu is acquired by Xiaomi last month, and next thing I dont need to say... It's no longer a valid benchmark
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app

GUYS WHATEVER YOU DO DONT USE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL BENCHMARK.
THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH IT. ME AND MY BROTHER HAVE IDENTICAL GT I9500s
I RAN THE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL FULL TEST AND MY PHONE CRASHED. IT WASNT BOOTING UP FOR ALMOST 15 MINUTES. BUT LATER IT BOOTED. IT WASNT OVERCLOCKED NEITHER WAS MY BROTHERS PHONE. NOW HE UNDERCLOCKED BOTH GPU AND CPU AND DID THE SAME. SAME THING HAPPENED TO HIM.
WHATEVER YOU DO DONT JUST USE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL.
I admit gt i9500 has low score in antutu thats why I went to test with quadrant professional.

LG-H959 marshmallow users please come in

Has anyone tried AnTuTu on our model?! I feel the cell is a bit lagy so i did mine. But the score itself looks not that bad, DOES IT?!!
Whoever did the test, could you share your result please! & what about battery life.
Mine is (V20a Singapore)

I'm using a Singapore H959 as well, how did you get Marshmallow on it?

(Exynos)Games have less FPS

So I was playing a game Critical Ops and I invited my friend to play it (he plays on iPhone SE). Most of the time, phone gets 50-60fps with lag spikes every minute or so. But my friend doesn't experience anything like this; he gets 55-60 without any lag spikes. So I've began to wonder if my phone is bad. So we made AnTuTu Benchmark and GeekBench and results were similar (about 130K in AnTuTu and about 5500 multi-core score in GeekBench). After this, I went to supermarket because there was a shop with phones that you can try. So I tried playing with shop's S7 (G930X), and I saw that it was running as same as my friend's iPhone did (55-60 without lag spikes) in the same graphics settings. I installed cpu monitoring app on my phone to see what's happening and I saw that CPU wasn't maxed out. 2 or 3 (I think stronger cores) weren't working. So I thought that they are corrupted or sth. so I did a benchmark with monitoring on and I saw that only then all cores were working(didn't test the S7 that was on shop though). So what it can be? Do I need to root my phone or is the phone itself bad? Please help.
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

Actually I have exynos S7 G930F variant I use to get lock ups playing Bloons TD 5 but after clearing recents and leaving that game still running it fixed the issue and got full speed no lock ups try clear recents before running games (I'm on superman rom and super kernel with default settings)
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Well I play BTD Battles(a little more intensive game than BTD5) and getting no problem, even in 30th round. I clear the recents and use Smart Manager widget to get some free ram before running a game.
I see you are rooted right? Do I really need to root my phone? It's only about 2 weeks old and I worried a little for the warranty but if there's no solution for without root then I will manage to make it at some point.
P.S. I think you are secured from this happening because you have a root and a custom rom and kernel so you can manage everything
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

Exynos G930F comes to a crawl at level 100+ on BTD5 with so much on screen

Don't forget that you have 4 times more pixel than the iPhone SE.

yea this might be the case but its got better battery life so you give and you get some

If possible, I will try to make a video on the shop's S7 and my s7's performance.
P.S. I wonder if G930X has Snapdragon because I can't find any info about this model in internet. If yes then everything's solved I guess
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

DarkLTU said:
If possible, I will try to make a video on the shop's S7 and my s7's performance.
P.S. I wonder if G930X has Snapdragon because I can't find any info about this model in internet. If yes then everything's solved I guess
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://compubench.com/device.jsp?b...D=Samsung+Galaxy+S7+(SM-G930x)&testgroup=info
4th google result

Thanks man!
Then everything's solved in this situation, but another question comes up: why CPU in Exynos version isn't maxed in game Critical Ops? Because if SD version has 4 cores and it works better than in my phone it means that something has to do with cores.
Can it be the game's problem and i need to report this problem?
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

Possible the game need optimising for 8 cores, but I think the SD S7 has slightly better graphics scores than the Exynos too

Ok so I reported the problem to developers now I need yo wait for their response.
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

New update rolled out yesterday so I updated and C-ops works pretty smoothly(better!) but still lag spikes.
But now I downloaded Minecraft: Pocket Edition and IT'S NOT 60FPS! It's SOMEWHAT smooth BUT sometimes I see 20-30fps in scenes that aren't showing much of a landscape. And I tried playing HearthStone, NFS:No Limits, GTA:SA and Alto's Adventure (because it was lagging for some people but it works good for me) and I don't see 60FPS from them either. What the hell Samsung. FYI, I tried turning off App power saving in Settings>Battery>App power saving.
P.S. I have read some articles and people said S6 (8 core phone) has worse performance BUT in Marshmallow, not Lollipop so let's hope it will change in Nougat.
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

Exynos variant has a weaker GPU than Qualcomm so most games will have lower FPS. Exynos does have a stronger CPU and better battery life but that doesn't help out so much with gaming.

weirddan455 said:
Exynos variant has a weaker GPU than Qualcomm so most games will have lower FPS. Exynos does have a stronger CPU and better battery life but that doesn't help out so much with gaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But what about iPhone SE then? It has garbage GPU (let's be honest) but CPU is very strong but still performs a little better than my phone. Maybe resolution helps.
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

I am thinking, should I sell my S7 for another phone? What do you guys think? Do you have any recommendations for another phone?
Sent from my SM-G930F using XDA-Developers mobile app

I wouldn't sell my S7 just because a single game won't reach 60 Fps, sure, the Adreno 530 on the SD Variant is a bit stronger but that doesn't mean the Mali T880 is weak by any means. I'm guessing it must be the software optimization probably because the developers were using an Adreno GPU or a Qualcomm developed gpu. Either way, try tinkering with the settings ( disabling Vsync and anti aliasing ) and see if that would work. You could also try overclocking the GPU if you want.
Goodluck

Htc u11 performance

Hello to all owners of the new beloved device for all of us htc fans.
I have created a benchmarking app last year called UxBench that is available on playstore for free and with no ads. I was just curious about this types of applications and how they can be consistent and accurate in the results.
I wonder if someone of the owners of the 11 can run the program and post here a screenshot or post the results from inside the app.
I have found until now that performance has to do also with software oprimizations and it is not only depended on hardware.
Last week an s8 reached the top after some months where huaweis were in top. I wonder really how high the 11 can be in this list having in mind that the 11 already has a great score despite the older hardware.
The test is very quick about 1-2 minutes. No need to worry about getting hot.

rhohpex said:
Hello to all owners of the new beloved device for all of us htc fans.
I have created a benchmarking app last year called UxBench that is available on playstore for free and with no ads. I was just curious about this types of applications and how they can be consistent and accurate in the results.
I wonder if someone of the owners of the 11 can run the program and post here a screenshot or post the results from inside the app.
I have found until now that performance has to do also with software oprimizations and it is not only depended on hardware.
Last week an s8 reached the top after some months where huaweis were in top. I wonder really how high the 11 can be in this list having in mind that the 11 already has a great score despite the older hardware.
The test is very quick about 1-2 minutes. No need to worry about getting hot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go

Easy first place. Im wondering why the s8 is so slow?
Run it again 200686

Sashtheflash said:
Easy first place. Im wondering why the s8 is so slow
Run it again 200686
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sashtheflash said:
Here you go
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I was sure the 11 is the fastest! I have seen videos in youtube showing a difference in app opening and multitasking with s8. Also my app shows clearly that software plays a great role in performance.
The storage reading is a little low. This is an unbuffered reading of text files. If that was a little higher the device could go about 220000.

My test...

here is mine, Sprint HTC U11.

Here's mine. UK model.

Here is mine. I was also playing Pandora at the same time.

It's a bit late now but here it goes. 64 gb French model.

I want to correct something the s8 and even the note 8 have an older chipset with less clock speed
not a year older but older

128GB Model
Viper rom with elementalx kernel

Nice. Stock, 1.27 single sim. 4gb/64gb.

Stock 1.27, Dual sim, 128Gb+6Gb

Here's mine. U11 stock 1.27 128 GB / 6 GB RAM from Hong Kong.

Sprint, bone stock
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk

Stock, 6/128gb

LEEDROID 6/128 211992
https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipONR1JB1sOD7l0eYsDf6KPd-inKsl7UUy2mq9jz

i dont know why does name seem different 128/6

128gb/6gb

US unlocked with Venom and Elemental X http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/59c3376444f04/Screenshot_20170920-203408.png?

Post Your Geek bench 4 Score

I got this, tops every other android in market on geekbench site.

Lol using old geekbench software... No pixel xl3 no s9 no note 9 no p20 pro
Sent from my POCOPHONE F1 using Tapatalk

Perfectdevil said:
Lol using old geekbench software... No pixel xl3 no s9 no note 9 no p20 pro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pls share if your geekbech 4 show these devices after running benchmark, pls share these device scores as well if you can, samsung note 9 mongoose single core score is higher only
fyi pls check official geekbench site https://browser.geekbench.com/android-benchmarks

Mine is only getting around 1800 for single core and 5500-6000 for multi core

here's mine

Arrow Os
Anatutu: 239744
Geekbench:
Single score: 1937
Multi score : 7592

Lineage OS 16 October 23 build

Murareelalm said:
Mine is only getting around 1800 for single core and 5500-6000 for multi core
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its very low comparing sd845 score, what u do, custom rom?

mralam92 said:
its very low comparing sd845 score, what u do, custom rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, I'm on the stock ROM and it's weird that I'm getting such low scores.

Me too getting very low scores on stock Rom, lower than SD820

Antutu 266547
6+128gb

As per my memory, 9.6.25.0 Stock
Antutu: 286000
Geekbench: 2400+/8800+

Sunny2ask said:
Me too getting very low scores on stock Rom, lower than SD820
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am also on stock MIUI, but mine tops, i didn't know why

mejgs said:
As per my memory, 9.6.25.0 Stock
Antutu: 286000
Geekbench: 2400+/8800+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does 9.6.25 cause faster battery draining?

mralam92 said:
does 9.6.25 cause faster battery draining?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all, minimum 7,5 to 8h SOT. A few days ago i reached 10h SOT

Xiaomi.eu rom

Single 2450
Multi 8494

MIUI global 9.6.14.0
Single: 1982
Multi: 7545
Strange

Los 16 October 28 build

why such low scores on mine?
6gb + 64gb