Got A6000/Plus Official XDA Forum..!! - Miscellaneous Android Development

Finally we got separate forum after a long period of time.
ALL CREDITS GOES TO OUR DEVELOPERS LIKE @Tarun93 @chhapil @Mr. AW @ED300 @flourmo and many more.
Recenrly I requested xda staff to create a separate forum.They created!
Here is the New Forum. http://forum.xda-developers.com/lenovo-a6000

great news thanks for xda

thank u so much..........

Related

[emu] saturn.emu Robert Broglia

hey guys wanted to share visit
explusalpha
.com (had to write this way because i dont have 10 posts yet)
it was realsed 22nd aug, still in beta and is very slow but looks promising... we all know how good roberts emu`s are.
dont forget to download the bios and activate in settings
SATURN.emu link =
http://www.explusalpha.com/home/saturn-emu
wheels83 said:
hey guys wanted to share visit
explusalpha
.com (had to write this way because i dont have 10 posts yet)
it was realsed 22nd aug, still in beta and is very slow but looks promising... we all know how good roberts emu`s are.
dont forget to download the bios and activate in settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure if he will continue it. He is using the same yabause source that Paul lamb (mupen64+ae dev) used in his Saturn test app but Robert has added his own UI instead. The source is not complete and is alot of work for Robert to continue so would not hold your hopes up. Head over to the yabause forum and check out if there is any activity as they are the people who will take this project further.
Pauls Code version link =
http://www.paulscode.com/forum/index.php?topic=200.0
Yabause forum original android port discussion thread link =
http://forums.yabause.org/index.php?topic=1323.0
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

[ROM][AOSP][GCC 4.7/-O3]CarbonRom 1.7 JB 4.2.2 [i9103][May 17][Discontinued]

CarbonRom is an aftermarket firmware based on the Android Open Source Project. We are dedicated to fast, stable, and feature-filled roms, honesty and communication with our users, and openness with our code. We like frequent builds, with the very latest and greatest hardware support and fixes. We strive to not only provide you with the best rom we can build, but also to give back to the Android community and our fellow developers. For us, this is about creating something we can be proud of and hope you will enjoy.
Please feel free to look at, build, and use our code on CarbonDev GitHub.
We would like to thank CyanogenMod for their device trees, framework/settings mods and their code that was incorporated into this project. We also extend our gratitude to the devs whose code that we have incorporated. Proper authorship has been maintained and can be viewed on our repository.
Special thanks also go to Slim Rom for some of their features, PA, AOKP, and anyone else we may have borrowed commits from that hasn't been mentioned here. If you feel you have been unfairly left out, please - let us know.
While we make every effort to test these builds as much as possible, we are not responsible for anything that may happen to your device, family, pets, or perception of reality. We ask that you do your part to know your device and know how to recover from problems before you flash! If you have questions, ask your fellow users or ask us in #teamcarbon on freenode IRC.
1.7 is a pretty big update for us! Check out the changelog on our goo.im page for more, but here are the highlights:
-We've fixed PIE! It no longer decides to be invisible from time to time.
-We fixed the battery charge light! None of us use it but apparently you guys are just nuts for it!
-Dark Carbon! Huge props to Slim Roms for coming up with this unique and awesome feature.
-Lockscreen theming
-CM skinny battery is back!
-Volume key lock on silent mode option
-Backup tool - if you're flashing a new version of Carbon and already have the required version of gapps installed, it will be backed up and restored during install. This applies to system apps and custom host files as well. Please note that you should only dirty flash from Carbon to Carbon. It's ok if it's another version or a nightly - just not over other roms. Super handy for you crack flashers. Make sure you've got the most recent Gapps though, and if you're flashing from a factory reset, you'll still need to install it after install of course.
-Long pressing the "clear recents" button clears the cache
-3.4 kernel on D2xxx devices. It's finally stable enough where we're comfortable with this - remember to only flash other 3.4 kernels or it will not boot as there are rom-level dependencies.
-AOKP's awesome new navbar settings
-NFC polling mode for when you want to keep your screen off and scan tags
-MMS and call "breathe" feature. Makes the notification icon fade in and out.
-Mute dings when changing volume
-Disable/enable CRT effect on screen on/off.
-3rd party keyboard bug fixed
-deodexed again
-stability and speed enhancements
-a million other little things as well - we basically don't even sleep anymore.
Screenshots
Download Carbon
Development is discontinued.
Support
1) Search. Search, search, search. Yes, you. I don't care how unique or important your question is, it's very likely someone has adressed it already. Especially if you're even close to new at this.
2) Read our FAQ, which can be found on our goo.im page linked above. It's new, but expanding fast. Just like us!
3) Ask a question here. Someone will no doubt try to help you. Warning: this help may come in the form of telling you it's a dumb question that has been asked before. See step 1 - such are the perils of asking questions when you haven't done the research yourself. Android is about helping yourself.
Who are the Team Carbon members?
andros11
BigShotRob
dg4prez
Kejar31
mattmanwrx
morfic
nocoast
pixeldotz
slick_rick
winner00
Thanks to your help we now have the machines we need for nightlies. We couldn't have done it without you! Remember, every penny you send to us goes right back into the rom. It's used for hardware, server costs, etc - all the things that help us make Carbon better with every release. Your support means the world to us! If you've enjoyed Carbon, please consider a donation toward this goal. Thank you, and we hope you continue to enjoy Carbon!
​
For general discussion and Q&A: head to this thread.
Links:
Rom: Development is discontinued.
GApps: http://goo.im/gapps
Known bugs:
CM10.1 official
USB connection
You tell me
Reserved for FAQ & other links - On behalf of Adam.
Wow... Great Adam!!!
Flashed this rom..one word is, Great..:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
kataria.vikesh said:
Flashed this rom..one word is, Great..:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this rom is really great... :thumbup:
sadly i couldnt connect it with my pc..are u able to connect it?
Very Good!
Very good!
Great Adam!!!
niks_25893 said:
this rom is really great... :thumbup:
sadly i couldnt connect it with my pc..are u able to connect it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hugohthuang said:
Very good!
Great Adam!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let we move the GT for this -> General Discussion thread of Carbon ROM.
How does this rom work? Somethink i can recommend to my brother with a Galaxy R?
jabbeboy said:
How does this rom work? Somethink i can recommend to my brother with a Galaxy R?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes you can recommend this without a doubt! for the general queries please use the general thread.
New build compiled! Testing now. Will upload if goes well.
Edit: Build up in the OP. USB connection issue is still present.
I know this might be the wrong section to post this..
But the kernel is either running at 1000 or in deep sleep. Wiped caches twice. Still no effect. Request Adam to please look into this
Nokia 2110-->Sony Ericsson k750i -->Nokia 5233 --> Samsung Galaxy R
Is this Official?
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda app-developers app
Tha TechnoCrat said:
Is this Official?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think no.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium

ATTENTION DEVELOPERS AND ROM COOKS

It has come to my attention that roms are being released without Kernel source coded being provided. As per XDA rules and XDA policy please post links to the source code to the kernel included in the rom. If the OEM doesnt provide the source code for their Stock kernel they are in violation of the GPL and in turn Roms for those devices will not be allowed on XDA.
Ok now that I gave this a day and see it has been seen by many take this as a fair warning.
Threads are to be updated with kernel source links with in 48 hours or the threads will be closed and all links will be removed.
This is not debatable.
I have a question...
As android is open source... Any one can use its source and make his/her own stuff... What i read is that Linux kernel is licensed under Apache license and anyone can use the source and the new source the developer make are his own now and depends on him if he wants to share it with someone else or not... Like miui is closed source... They don't share there source and also OEM's like Samsung and HTC don't share all source... So why is it so compulsory for devs to post there source?
I am not sure where i am wrong... I am not offending xda rules... I am just asking what i am missing here... So please correct me where i am wrong...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lokeshsaini94 said:
I have a question...
As android is open source... Any one can use its source and make his/her own stuff... What i read is that Linux kernel is licensed under Apache license and anyone can use the source and the new source the developer make are his own now and depends on him if he wants to share it with someone else or not... Like miui is closed source... They don't share there source and also OEM's like Samsung and HTC don't share all source... So why is it so compulsory for devs to post there source?
I am not sure where i am wrong... I am not offending xda rules... I am just asking what i am missing here... So please correct me where i am wrong...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Linux kernel is licensed under the GPL license not the Apache. Only the kernel source code is required to be posted.
Wayne Tech Nexus
zelendel said:
It has come to my attention that roms are being released without Kernel source coded being provided. As per XDA rules and XDA policy please post links to the source code to the kernel included in the rom. If the OEM doesnt provide the source code for their Stock kernel they are in violation of the GPL and in turn Roms for those devices will not be allowed on XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Themed Stock ROMs also comes under this?? And this post is only found here,not on specifc device threads...
Dark4Droid said:
Themed Stock ROMs also comes under this?? And this post is only found here,not on specifc device threads...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is for only those roms which are compiled from source... You can't post source of kernel if your rom is stock... But if you compiled kernel from source... The kernel you used in you custom rom then post source for the kernel in your rom thread...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lokeshsaini94 said:
This is for only those roms which are compiled from source... You can't post source of kernel if your rom is stock... But if you compiled kernel from source... The kernel you used in you custom rom then post source for the kernel in your rom thread...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
zelendel said:
This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For my device Micromax A110...Kernel Sources arent released and they wont but its clone device "Mobistel Cynus T2" released Kernel Source...So is that enough??
One Kernel was compiled using it....
And if yes,i will notify Micromax A110 Forum Developers about it :laugh: Sorry if i am disturbing
Dark4Droid said:
For my device Micromax A110...Kernel Sources arent released and they wont but its clone device "Mobistel Cynus T2" released Kernel Source...So is that enough??
One Kernel was compiled using it....
And if yes,i will notify Micromax A110 Forum Developers about it :laugh: Sorry if i am disturbing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom.
zelendel said:
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok,Will let them know...Thanks for letting me know..Bro.. ​
Ok guys I have given plenty of time on this, and will still work with people but com the middle of next week I will be going to each thread and if the thread doesnt have the proper kernel links The thread will be closed and all links will be removed.
But Our phone manufacturers doesn't provided d kernel source...
so is that our fault??
So If u don't want d violation of GPL..and XDA rules..
then Send official notice to Phone manufacturers or phone company who release their phones without kernel sources...
Why closing our thread???
So we should consider now that..
we r being pushed out of our favorite Home..i.e. Xda..???????
I am doing what I can to help with the source code for the kernels.
You have 2 choices if no source is available le. Remove the kernel or the thread will be removed.
Wayne Tech Nexus
zelendel said:
I am doing what I can to help with the source code for the kernels.
You have 2 choices if no source is available le. Remove the kernel or the thread will be removed.
Wayne Tech Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but how to remove stock kernel...my friend??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Kinghacker said:
but how to remove stock kernel...my friend??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just remove boot.IMG and the script from updater script for boot.IMG.....I will remove my ROMs on Tuesday morning....
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Dark4Droid said:
Just remove boot.IMG and the script from updater script for boot.IMG.....I will remove my ROMs on Tuesday morning....
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but without that how can rom will boot...
and every users dont hv d file??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Kinghacker said:
but without that how can rom will boot...
and every users dont hv d file??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boot.IMG is already there on a android device......So it doesn't matter....But when it comes to different Android versions like ICS and JB...It will matter...Also on MIUI and LEWA too
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Ok guys I got a reply from Micromax
[FONT=&quot]Dear Valued Customer,[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your Email, we would like to inform you that we can not provide any [/FONT][FONT=&quot]kernel source code from our end.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]For any further Assistance and Query you can contact us on the Customer Support number given below:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]18605008286[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]You can also log onto our website for information www.micromaxinfo.com[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Assuring you with best of our services and we value your association with us.[/FONT]
and my reply
Then who would I contact about the kernel source code for the devices. It is required by law that upon request the device OEM has to provide the source code. If they refuse Google can and has revoked the rights to use Android. Please provide me with who I must get into contact with concerning this.
I would suggest as many people that can do the same as I am doing.
zelendel said:
Ok guys I got a reply from Micromax
[FONT=&quot]Dear Valued Customer,[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your Email, we would like to inform you that we can not provide any [/FONT][FONT=&quot]kernel source code from our end.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]For any further Assistance and Query you can contact us on the Customer Support number given below:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]18605008286[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]You can also log onto our website for information www.micromaxinfo.com[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Assuring you with best of our services and we value your association with us.[/FONT]
and my reply
Then who would I contact about the kernel source code for the devices. It is required by law that upon request the device OEM has to provide the source code. If they refuse Google can and has revoked the rights to use Android. Please provide me with who I must get into contact with concerning this.
I would suggest as many people that can do the same as I am doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the exact same reply I said about bro....So what's next from our side???
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Next I await their reply about who to contact about it. I would advise people to start emailing them. Maybe drop a few tech sites the info and see if they will run a story about it. I am not saying spam the site. But don't just accept what they say. Push the issue.
Wayne Tech Nexus

[Req][New MMX canvas2 rear cam issue]

Hi respected devs and users,
I hope there is a serious issue going around this forum,you guyz know that MMX is now selling canvas2 with jb out of the box.
You guyz @Dark4Droid @BOND1987 @sagarwep @andiroxu @bsuhas @mufti.arfan @bindassdost @khan_frd2002 @pratikmore @mmxandy @superdragonpt @varun.chitre15 and many more did a fantastic job by bringing the 4.2 to our device which was an almost impossible.
The issue is now the new canvas2 with 4.2 installed is not having a working rear cam.
As this is a forum for our beloved device we don't have a seperate section for the latest canvas2 variant,actually many users are suffering because of this and also many users will buy canvas2 in future.
I know that MMX don't care about even announcing the changes they made to the device as they always do,so as you devs are the only responsible for the miracle happened and happening to our device in this forum,so please kindly address this issue so that this forum may have many upcoming canvas2 supporters who buys the phone in future.
My kind request to users who have the canvas2 with rear cam not working to post a log cat while opening your camera in 4.2,so that it will be easy to find the actual issue.
You users can make this thread active by responding with proper log cats.its in your hands.
Thank you,
Showstopper1
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
poran123 said:
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google it.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Please find the solutin we need must waiting for resolution.... of cam
mufti.arfan said:
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
nightwalker said:
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
mufti.arfan said:
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
nightwalker said:
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The pre loaded one, and it's kernel compilation time, if that will be different than our it means kernel is new. If it's same then we can try libs from it, if that doesn't work either then its a hardware thingy.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
superdragonpt said:
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
(...). Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.(...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think that my no source is making you fool then it's to you.
Everybody is fair handsome here and know everything.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
New mmx have slight hardware change i guess or the kernel issue some one needs to share their device(or system libs) here so that devs can make a change
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!! As a member of A110 community you should be aware of this !!!
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
@superdragonpt & @andiroxu Stop it friends....Dont fight... Just understand we are fighting for Cheap[i didnt mean price] device.... Human relations is far better than Device Relations... I know i got plenty of friends because of MMX C2.... But Why fight for it? I agree both Varun and andiroxu have their own capablities,better leave them alone...
And @superdragonpt : Any Add-ons for 4.2 ? :laugh: More ROM's are on NR... I am using Xperia Messaging app on 4.2 :angel:
andiroxu said:
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro i have install the app but i didnt find any information about camera.... m using miui rom 4.1.2 and i dont have the backup of the original JB rom which came along with my phone
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Edit: I really don't understand in what sense comment of @superdragonpt sounds like a moderator?
mayur.3.92 said:
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buddy, let me tell you this:
Im not an MOD, but i can't stand people that STEALS, other's work, And what's worse is that he is CLAIMING it is his work.
You don't understand what we are talking about, and that's normal, the "normal" xda user don't understand this things, but believe me i know.
The normal xda user, just want RESULTS, and don't care about GPL and credits, and dont even imagine HOW MUCH WORK was involved.
The normal xda user, just come here, download and thats it!
@andiroxu Yes you have stolen varun's work. and you should be an shame of yourself.
Come on prove that im wrong, and upload your kernel sources...
But PLEASE don't repeat tha same trick you've done in your kernel thread when you uploaded FAKE sources.
I didnt wanted to come in public with this statments, i dont even own an micromax phone (my phone is an ZTE), but if there is something that gets on my nerves is this things.
I have an DEEPLY RESPECT with all the work that @varun.chitre15 have done, just like every other dev.
These devs are the reason we have custom roms and kernels, as an alternative to our stock ones.
varun.chitre15 said:
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ THIS.

Discovery Rom

Why is there no thread for Discovery rom in development section?
please add it so that users can report bugs and give feedbacks
Yep. Dev please take notice here...
sent from my mobile using some
app

Categories

Resources