Hi respected devs and users,
I hope there is a serious issue going around this forum,you guyz know that MMX is now selling canvas2 with jb out of the box.
You guyz @Dark4Droid @BOND1987 @sagarwep @andiroxu @bsuhas @mufti.arfan @bindassdost @khan_frd2002 @pratikmore @mmxandy @superdragonpt @varun.chitre15 and many more did a fantastic job by bringing the 4.2 to our device which was an almost impossible.
The issue is now the new canvas2 with 4.2 installed is not having a working rear cam.
As this is a forum for our beloved device we don't have a seperate section for the latest canvas2 variant,actually many users are suffering because of this and also many users will buy canvas2 in future.
I know that MMX don't care about even announcing the changes they made to the device as they always do,so as you devs are the only responsible for the miracle happened and happening to our device in this forum,so please kindly address this issue so that this forum may have many upcoming canvas2 supporters who buys the phone in future.
My kind request to users who have the canvas2 with rear cam not working to post a log cat while opening your camera in 4.2,so that it will be easy to find the actual issue.
You users can make this thread active by responding with proper log cats.its in your hands.
Thank you,
Showstopper1
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
poran123 said:
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google it.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Please find the solutin we need must waiting for resolution.... of cam
mufti.arfan said:
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
nightwalker said:
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
mufti.arfan said:
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
nightwalker said:
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The pre loaded one, and it's kernel compilation time, if that will be different than our it means kernel is new. If it's same then we can try libs from it, if that doesn't work either then its a hardware thingy.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
superdragonpt said:
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
(...). Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.(...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think that my no source is making you fool then it's to you.
Everybody is fair handsome here and know everything.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
New mmx have slight hardware change i guess or the kernel issue some one needs to share their device(or system libs) here so that devs can make a change
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!! As a member of A110 community you should be aware of this !!!
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
@superdragonpt & @andiroxu Stop it friends....Dont fight... Just understand we are fighting for Cheap[i didnt mean price] device.... Human relations is far better than Device Relations... I know i got plenty of friends because of MMX C2.... But Why fight for it? I agree both Varun and andiroxu have their own capablities,better leave them alone...
And @superdragonpt : Any Add-ons for 4.2 ? :laugh: More ROM's are on NR... I am using Xperia Messaging app on 4.2 :angel:
andiroxu said:
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro i have install the app but i didnt find any information about camera.... m using miui rom 4.1.2 and i dont have the backup of the original JB rom which came along with my phone
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Edit: I really don't understand in what sense comment of @superdragonpt sounds like a moderator?
mayur.3.92 said:
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buddy, let me tell you this:
Im not an MOD, but i can't stand people that STEALS, other's work, And what's worse is that he is CLAIMING it is his work.
You don't understand what we are talking about, and that's normal, the "normal" xda user don't understand this things, but believe me i know.
The normal xda user, just want RESULTS, and don't care about GPL and credits, and dont even imagine HOW MUCH WORK was involved.
The normal xda user, just come here, download and thats it!
@andiroxu Yes you have stolen varun's work. and you should be an shame of yourself.
Come on prove that im wrong, and upload your kernel sources...
But PLEASE don't repeat tha same trick you've done in your kernel thread when you uploaded FAKE sources.
I didnt wanted to come in public with this statments, i dont even own an micromax phone (my phone is an ZTE), but if there is something that gets on my nerves is this things.
I have an DEEPLY RESPECT with all the work that @varun.chitre15 have done, just like every other dev.
These devs are the reason we have custom roms and kernels, as an alternative to our stock ones.
varun.chitre15 said:
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ THIS.
Related
CM9 port on Galaxy 3
Note: Flashing this rom will wipe your previous rom and data so make sure to have a backup !
Download Link :
Current version : Build 4
All files can be downloaded from Google Code : http://code.google.com/p/ics-for-g3/downloads/list
How to install :
Wipe data/factory reset in recovery.
Flash through odin with one package ticked.
First boot is very slow due to odex. give it enough time to boot.
Working :
Android 4.0.3 / CM9
Touchscreen
Vibrator
SD card
Mobile Phone with audio
Mobile Data
WIFI
Audio (Build 2)
All Sensors (Build 2)
gps (Build 2)
data stats (Build 2)
openfimg (Build 2)
headset (Build 3)
usb storage (Build 3)
camera (build 4) no preview
openfimg updated (build4)
stable kernel at 1GHz (build 4)
Not Working :
FIMG GPU Drivers
Bluetooth
MobileAP
If you don't find a feature listed in working or not working list that means it is not working yet. Please don't ask for it again and again.
Developers:
marcellusbe
apollo5801
arakmar
tom3q
Donations:
We use marcellusbe's private server to develop and build CM9.
It helps a lot and improve the development speed. But unfortunately, it has a cost.
So, donations are greatly appreciated. We decided to give all donations to marcellusbe as he rents the server.
Some screenshots
Video (thanks brigo !)
For developers : IRC channel and sources
Server: irc.freenode.net
Channel: #icsforg3
Team : https://github.com/sg3
Setttings up the build environment : http://source.android.com/source/initializing.html
How to get AOSP ICS/CM9 source : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1361827
A few other devs are already working together to create an ICS ROM so maybe you should join them instead.
Smonic said:
A few other devs are already working together to create an ICS ROM so maybe you should join them instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well this is from those devs only. Team thread.
Is ICSforg3 the name about the team of Hillbeast ?
brigo said:
Is ICSforg3 the name about the team of Hillbeast ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is the team I am in. I woke up and got notified we should use this.
Team member at this stage are listed on my old thread.
icsforg3 said:
Well this is from those devs only. Team thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But there is already a thread named [project] ICS port or something like that and a group of devs are contributing. You should join with them and delete this thread. It saves many different people doing the same thing and the more devs the merrier.
Edit : I think hillbeast is also in this as i just read above so i was mistaken. Sorry.
hillbeast said:
Yes this is the team I am in. I woke up and got notified we should use this.
Team member at this stage are listed on my old thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok Good idea ! I really hope the ICS porting on our phone will be finalised one day
Brhhooooohhh. Developers, "Rockstars"?? What?? .
dhirend_6d said:
Brhhooooohhh. Developers, "Rockstars"?? What?? .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes who is he ?
Question
You think that with ICS we can have more perfs ?
Piraze91 said:
You think that with ICS we can have more perfs ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now performance isn't on our list of things to do. But no, the performance isn't any better at this stage as we have no GPU drivers and JIT isn't working.
thanks
Thanks for reply and good luck at devellopers !
This thread must be sticky !
Good luck to all ! We're waiting for you all who make our G3 an epic phone, just unbelievable
thanks members w8ing for ICS for Galaxy 3 =] u are awesome
Why don't you complete cyanogonmod 7 first? That has already made great progress and if you all work together on it we can have a nice Christmas present.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Smonic said:
Why don't you complete cyanogonmod 7 first? That has already made great progress and if you all work together on it we can have a nice Christmas present.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true ... but they know best what to do and what not to do we should just wait until CM7 / CM9 are finished and hope that we wont wait much
Smonic said:
Why don't you complete cyanogonmod 7 first? That has already made great progress and if you all work together on it we can have a nice Christmas present.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm for that.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Finally, I can post in dev section ^^
The point of trying to port cm9 is that it's brand new, and way more fun to start from scratch than catching up on a well advanced project.
Besides, developpers are once again free to choose which project to work on, and if people want so much cm7 to be completed, they still can set up a dev environnement, and get to work !
atcfrog said:
Finally, I can post in dev section ^^
The point of trying to port cm9 is that it's brand new, and way more fun to start from scratch than catching up on a well advanced project.
Besides, developpers are once again free to choose which project to work on, and if people want so much cm7 to be completed, they still can set up a dev environnement, and get to work !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not all people have such knowledge. Anyway it's their choice. I'm just saying it will probably take already 6 moths to complete this whereas it will only take 2 to 3 moths max finishing cyanogenmod 7 if everyone works together.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF CLOSURE
I am sorry to say that I cannot further develop this rom, reason: My laptop needs to be repaired/replaced and by the time it is replaced
people would be confused as to why the rom has not been released. Sorry to all those who where looking forward to it. Or who wanted to Test it. Techno-Update will close/delete this thread soon. Cheers Techno
Also I will be working with Amal Das on a themed stock rom , at the
moment I can only make the APK's for it from my phone and I can sort of design the images from my phone etc. Anyway just a notice to prevent confusion.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
oh nooo,another custom,ops "themed" Deodexed stock rom.
Re: Your Post
EliTSamsunG said:
oh nooo,another custom,ops "themed" Deodexed stock rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look EliTSamsnG , I have made the ROM for myself . You should respect the fact that I published it online. Read the full post , atleast try my rom before criticizing or any of the sort. And it is not "Themed". People like you making posts like that make me more and more wanting to not contribute to the board at all. Think about what you say before saying it!
downloading
I.AM.H3RO said:
Look EliTSamsnG , I have made the ROM for myself . You should respect the fact that I published it online. Read the full post , atleast try my rom before criticizing or any of the sort. And it is not "Themed". People like you making posts like that make me more and more wanting to not contribute to the board at all. Think about what you say before saying it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not being rude,but Galaxy is turning y party roms.
EliTSamsunG said:
Im not being rude,but Galaxy is turning y party roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what would you preffer no Roms or around seven?
Does anyone know how to fix the WiFi Bug?
Is it something to do with a corrupt kernel maybe? How would I go about fixing it? If you could help me out that would be brilliant!
Re : WiFi Bug
I think I have fixed the bug! Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohoooooooooooooooo! Lol just joking.
Yeh so I will upload v1.1 either later in the week or tommorow! I hope you enjoyed my rom and chow for now!
I will test, but the status bar is ugly (an opnion)
dude nice rom but
you said in your description
iam hero iam STABLE
but to many bugs!
it aint stable bro!!
I.AM.H3RO said:
Warning!
Althought this has not caused a problem for me and most likely everyone who has tested this be warned that your phone is yours responsibility and that if you brick it that it is not my fault it is yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LoL
I don't want my phone become brick
give you a credit for making a rom...
but it's a bit buggy maybe i will download the next version of your rom when you have fix the bugs..
That's the disclaimer everyone has.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Next version I will change it
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Version 2 List added
Please read the version 2 list , its at the bottom of the post. And tell me what you think. Im also going to add the ICS status bar (Maybe).
Can someone port V1 for other samsung devices?
Please can anyone port my rom to any of the other Samsung devices e.g. S III , S I , S II , S Galaxy Y Pro , S Galaxy Y Duos etc. Thanks in advance. Once I get enough donations I will buy one of these phones so I can port it!
I.AM.H3RO said:
Please can anyone port my rom to any of the other Samsung devices e.g. S III , S I , S II , S Galaxy Y Pro , S Galaxy Y Duos etc. Thanks in advance. Once I get enough donations I will buy one of these phones so I can port it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm afraid its an impossible task for any human (lol)
Does anyone know how to fix the WiFi bug????? If they do can you fix it , signit and re-upload thanks and send me a PM.
14 toggles statusbar would be a nice feature. It's what I usually look for in a custom ROM.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk
btw, what is the base rom for your project?
As we all know, a lot a people has been talking about the size race regarding the combination of an Android 4.1+ and Google Apps packages.
My attempt on this is to provide an up-to-date, lightweight package for original Google Apps, being a standard for our community, so all the Jelly Bean based roms can link to this thread.
NOTE FOR DEVELOPERS / PUBLISHERS
If you intend to mention this package in your ROM post, please do it as a link to this thread, for the sake of the information provided here and community dynamics.
[size=+1]Download[/size]
[highlight]Please DO NOT create mirrors for the link below. If you have problems downloading, report it through a post and someone may try to help.[/highlight]
Code:
http://www.mediafire.com/?9llkj6399epw5kz
[size=+1]Changelog[/size]
I may not provide changelogs, since all I am doing is re-packaging an already existent package, which changes are described at RootzWiki: http://wiki.rootzwiki.com/Google_Apps#20121011.
Anything about my own process on this will be listed below, at "Important Notes".
[size=+1]Important notes[/size]
Applications and libraries related to hardware we don't have or can't handle [yet?], such as voice input and front camera, were removed.
I DID NOT touch any of the internal files; they remain original and completely tested.
[size=+1]Bugs[/size]
Since all the contents of the package are original files from Google, I do not expect them to fail. If so, it's not up to me.
But I do expect problems regarding the packaging, although I have experienced none so far. Please report any problems you find with useful information. I will just ignore/report posts like "it doesn't work" or any generic message like this.
Changelog? Apps removed?
simplicio11 said:
Changelog? Apps removed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did not provide a packaging changelog and I don't think it'd ever be useful, since changes are described at RootzWiki: http://wiki.rootzwiki.com/Google_Apps#20121011.
I will insert this link on the original post, thanks.
About the removed apps, it's just like I said in the first note in "Important Notes". If a lot of people ask me to list the exact files I did not include in my package, I will think about doing it or just suggest the user do run a diff on both packages' zipinfo. Since this is a development thread, users interacting here might be comfortable with such easy operation.
Doesn't belong to original development... more like themes and apps or a "lightweight gapps for ICS/JB" sticky (if a mod wants)
Sent from my LG-P500
vlt96 said:
Doesn't belong to original development... more like themes and apps or a "lightweight gapps for ICS/JB" sticky (if a mod wants)
Sent from my LG-P500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure it doesn't belong to original development?
Anyway, I may be ending this project, since I'll have a huge lack of time and Rashed is also working on a lightweight version of gapps (which was updated today). This thread will be closed, if so.
vlt96 said:
Doesn't belong to original development... more like themes and apps or a "lightweight gapps for ICS/JB" sticky (if a mod wants)
Sent from my LG-P500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that you're the one to say that. Since this is his own work it should be here like the other original things. To the developer: please continue your work because you're doing a damn good job an please don't take comments like him serious.
TheRedHunter said:
vlt96 said:
Doesn't belong to original development... more like themes and apps or a "lightweight gapps for ICS/JB" sticky (if a mod wants)
Sent from my LG-P500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that you're the one to say that. Since this is his own work it should be here like the other original things. To the developer: please continue your work because you're doing a damn good job an please don't take comments like him serious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Don't take a ~3000 post user serious, but take a ~150 dead serious." (lol I'm like 15 posts so obviously you can ignore me hahaha)
I think this isn't developing, so it belongs to Apps, however that doesn't mean this thread is irrelevant or bad (actually I think stripping gapps to only the needed ones is a great idea)
If I was to flash JB GAPPS, these will be. Thanks!
TheRedHunter said:
I don't think that you're the one to say that. Since this is his own work it should be here like the other original things. To the developer: please continue your work because you're doing a damn good job an please don't take comments like him serious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
emyller said:
Are you sure it doesn't belong to original development?
Anyway, I may be ending this project, since I'll have a huge lack of time and Rashed is also working on a lightweight version of gapps (which was updated today). This thread will be closed, if so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want, I will upload light gapps this afternoon... it won't take more than 5 minutes and I don't even need my PC... just removing some apks and libs...
Sent from my LG-P500
End off-topic
vlt96 said:
If you want, I will upload light gapps this afternoon... it won't take more than 5 minutes and I don't even need my PC... just removing some apks and libs...
Sent from my LG-P500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for belittling my work with your high knowledge and skills, but no, I don't need such participation.
If you don't think my work is useful/valuable enough, please just do not express yourself. Other threads may need your help, instead.
I will not go into an unnecessary discussion and this is my last speech about this. I will ignore future posts not related to the thread focus or just ask a mod to close this.
Thanks for understanding.
To Some clean space to Our beloved devs I made this thread for all the questions , reviews , problems , etc . Before Posting anything Please look into these resources or Quick Google your doubt , if not found than ask here .
OFFCIAL CM10 DEVELOPMENT THREAD
GENERAL PANTECH BURST DISCUSSION THREAD
[INDEX]EVERYTHING FOR PANTECH BURST
Working -
Everything For Daily Driver
Whats not working :-
CLICK ME :fingers-crossed:
Download Links :-
CM10 [PulicRelease] - HERE
Gapps for JB 4.1.x - HERE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
::: INSTALLATION PROCEDURE :::
-First of all , If In case Any loss happened Neither the Dev team or me is responsible for that . Though Nothing should happen 99.9% .
-Boot into CWM Recovery . Either 5.x or 6.x ( by Attn1 one [Preferred]) . Everything will be safe . Don't believe in any myths of cwm 6.x is dangerous and all . For reference -> These recoveries are one my self tested .
-Clear Wipe Data / Factory reset and clear dalvik cache from advance menu .
-Install from SD/EXT-Sd ( Where you put simply select that one)
-Choose zip and confirm action .
- Flash Gapps
-Reboot .
Optional :
-Give thanks and help the DEV team by donations
----
Before any questions make sure you googled your question thoroughly and scanned this URL and made sure your problem's solution don't lie there
UPDATE :
CM11 and new recoveries .
dpwguenther said:
is it safe to flash without downgrading to GB , just as cm?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup it is safe to flash over ICS . I did on cm5.x But I think that doesn't matter .
ujjwalchhabra said:
Yup it is safe to flash over ICS . I did on cm5.x But I think that doesn't matter .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive noticed that the latest build of cm10 has popup error that the other one didnt have , it was something about android.core has stopped
Ive updated the wiki to include this discussion
If I find a cm10 mod for another phone, like a 5 button shortcut lockscreen or changing the lockscreen font, can I use it with this cm10 ?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda app-developers app
dpwguenther said:
If I find a cm10 mod for another phone, like a 5 button shortcut lockscreen or changing the lockscreen font, can I use it with this cm10 ?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to use go locker and theres a theme on the play store that almost copys our lockscreen on the ics update. https://play.google.com/store/apps/...W5vdGVjaC5nb3NjcmVlbmxvY2sudGhlbWUuYnVyc3QiXQ..
Paranoid Android ROM
I just finished compiling Paranoid Android for the Burst. I'm going to test it out when I get home and I'll let you know how it works.
Check out my guide, Compile Unofficial Paranoid Android for Pantech Burst
marcusmarcus said:
I just finished compiling Paranoid Android for the Burst. I'm going to test it out when I get home and I'll let you know how it works.
Check out my guide, Compile Unofficial Paranoid Android for Pantech Burst
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once CM gets fixed everything will be up ! There will be like rain of rims What I think But Cm project seems somewhat slow :/ . I downloaded 5.4gb somehow . 3.6gb left still for CM10 .
ujjwalchhabra said:
Once CM gets fixed everything will be up ! There will be like rain of rims What I think But Cm project seems somewhat slow :/ . I downloaded 5.4gb somehow . 3.6gb left still for CM10 .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. The nice thing about Paranoid is it is based on CM10, so once CM has everything fixed, PA will most likely have everything fixed. It takes a long time to download the repo. Glad I have 15Mbps Internet, though this makes me wish it was even faster.
If anyone wants to test out Paranoid Android on their Burst, I posted a link to the one I built at the bottom of the first post on Compile Unofficial Paranoid Android for Pantech Burst
marcusmarcus said:
Yeah. The nice thing about Paranoid is it is based on CM10, so once CM has everything fixed, PA will most likely have everything fixed. It takes a long time to download the repo. Glad I have 15Mbps Internet, though this makes me wish it was even faster.
If anyone wants to test out Paranoid Android on their Burst, I posted a link to the one I built at the bottom of the first post on Compile Unofficial Paranoid Android for Pantech Burst
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saw your guide I'll have to try it out when I get home that way i'll have all 3 ready to go once cm is ready. marked your post as an announcement to keep it at the top
kagedws6 said:
saw your guide I'll have to try it out when I get home that way i'll have all 3 ready to go once cm is ready. marked your post as an announcement to keep it at the top
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have all 3 ready, too.
Isn't External SD support and USB mount fixed? - by Milf
Not sure about usb mount but I know ext sd does not. I couldnt even get it to mount through terminal. Anybody get external to mount at all?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
See this :- Link
Here is the public release with the call audio/usb and sd mounting/att data fixes.
Please report back any issues and if possible have a logcat of you while the issue came up so we can better work towards trouble shooting the problems.
GPS doesn't work.
The CRT off animation works randomly with stock theme and doesn't work with other themes.
SystemUI FCs when theme is changed.
This is on the 7th march build.
adizz4 said:
This is on the 7th march build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first: thank you for posting here. You have been one of the few users, that understands the purpose of this thread.
In the repositories there are many pending changes. For this reason, there is no valid rom with date "March 7th", is smarter wait a few days to install the rom.
We do not wish to delay the changes, but these must be properly tested. When these changes can be considered validated, will be communicated to all users.
Thank you.
mifl said:
The first: thank you for posting here. You have been one of the few users, that understands the purpose of this thread.
In the repositories there are many pending changes. For this reason, there is no valid rom with dated March 7, is smarter, wait a few days to install the rom.
We do not wish to delay the changes, but these must be properly tested. When these changes are approved, will be communicated to all users.
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good::good::laugh: I'm really happy . And feel grateful that we have hardworking people like you, ninjah ,stevodo and all . I just started this work and now I felt how difficult it it indeed . Make changes compile than flash and all that stuff is pain in ...... . I'll give my best to again make custom rom of CM10 -AOKP - PA . Least I'm capable of now :silly:
Maybe we should start a thread for specifically for reporting bugs in co10 builds. That way it keeps the porting thread cleaner. Maybe in the orignial post for it, put an outline of how to report bugs, like build name/date, issue(s) reporting, logcat attachment /pastbin, etc.
marcusmarcus said:
Maybe we should start a thread for specifically for reporting bugs in co10 builds. That way it keeps the porting thread cleaner. Maybe in the orignial post for it, put an outline of how to report bugs, like build name/date, issue(s) reporting, logcat attachment /pastbin, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no point. People do not want to understand the reasons that is requested write messages in one or another thread.
Every day that passes I am more convinced that writing in our threads is like preaching in the dessert.
For my part suggest that users who really want to contribute to this project visit http://www.devsnest.com.
P.D. Sorry to be so negative, but today people with their lack of education has put me grumpy.
Greetings.
It has come to my attention that roms are being released without Kernel source coded being provided. As per XDA rules and XDA policy please post links to the source code to the kernel included in the rom. If the OEM doesnt provide the source code for their Stock kernel they are in violation of the GPL and in turn Roms for those devices will not be allowed on XDA.
Ok now that I gave this a day and see it has been seen by many take this as a fair warning.
Threads are to be updated with kernel source links with in 48 hours or the threads will be closed and all links will be removed.
This is not debatable.
I have a question...
As android is open source... Any one can use its source and make his/her own stuff... What i read is that Linux kernel is licensed under Apache license and anyone can use the source and the new source the developer make are his own now and depends on him if he wants to share it with someone else or not... Like miui is closed source... They don't share there source and also OEM's like Samsung and HTC don't share all source... So why is it so compulsory for devs to post there source?
I am not sure where i am wrong... I am not offending xda rules... I am just asking what i am missing here... So please correct me where i am wrong...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lokeshsaini94 said:
I have a question...
As android is open source... Any one can use its source and make his/her own stuff... What i read is that Linux kernel is licensed under Apache license and anyone can use the source and the new source the developer make are his own now and depends on him if he wants to share it with someone else or not... Like miui is closed source... They don't share there source and also OEM's like Samsung and HTC don't share all source... So why is it so compulsory for devs to post there source?
I am not sure where i am wrong... I am not offending xda rules... I am just asking what i am missing here... So please correct me where i am wrong...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Linux kernel is licensed under the GPL license not the Apache. Only the kernel source code is required to be posted.
Wayne Tech Nexus
zelendel said:
It has come to my attention that roms are being released without Kernel source coded being provided. As per XDA rules and XDA policy please post links to the source code to the kernel included in the rom. If the OEM doesnt provide the source code for their Stock kernel they are in violation of the GPL and in turn Roms for those devices will not be allowed on XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Themed Stock ROMs also comes under this?? And this post is only found here,not on specifc device threads...
Dark4Droid said:
Themed Stock ROMs also comes under this?? And this post is only found here,not on specifc device threads...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is for only those roms which are compiled from source... You can't post source of kernel if your rom is stock... But if you compiled kernel from source... The kernel you used in you custom rom then post source for the kernel in your rom thread...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
lokeshsaini94 said:
This is for only those roms which are compiled from source... You can't post source of kernel if your rom is stock... But if you compiled kernel from source... The kernel you used in you custom rom then post source for the kernel in your rom thread...
Thank you...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
zelendel said:
This is not so. The kernel source HAS to be made available. If the OEM doesnt provide the kernel source then no rom for that device will be allowed. OEMs post the source code for their kernels. Well most do anyway, the ones that dont are in violation of the GPL laws.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For my device Micromax A110...Kernel Sources arent released and they wont but its clone device "Mobistel Cynus T2" released Kernel Source...So is that enough??
One Kernel was compiled using it....
And if yes,i will notify Micromax A110 Forum Developers about it :laugh: Sorry if i am disturbing
Dark4Droid said:
For my device Micromax A110...Kernel Sources arent released and they wont but its clone device "Mobistel Cynus T2" released Kernel Source...So is that enough??
One Kernel was compiled using it....
And if yes,i will notify Micromax A110 Forum Developers about it :laugh: Sorry if i am disturbing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom.
zelendel said:
What ever kernel is in the rom that is posted must have available kernel source. If roms are using the stock kernel and no sources are available then it will be removed. If it is using a custom kernel based on the clone source and a link to the source can be provided then that is fine. But the source MUST match the kernel in the rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok,Will let them know...Thanks for letting me know..Bro..
Ok guys I have given plenty of time on this, and will still work with people but com the middle of next week I will be going to each thread and if the thread doesnt have the proper kernel links The thread will be closed and all links will be removed.
But Our phone manufacturers doesn't provided d kernel source...
so is that our fault??
So If u don't want d violation of GPL..and XDA rules..
then Send official notice to Phone manufacturers or phone company who release their phones without kernel sources...
Why closing our thread???
So we should consider now that..
we r being pushed out of our favorite Home..i.e. Xda..???????
I am doing what I can to help with the source code for the kernels.
You have 2 choices if no source is available le. Remove the kernel or the thread will be removed.
Wayne Tech Nexus
zelendel said:
I am doing what I can to help with the source code for the kernels.
You have 2 choices if no source is available le. Remove the kernel or the thread will be removed.
Wayne Tech Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but how to remove stock kernel...my friend??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Kinghacker said:
but how to remove stock kernel...my friend??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just remove boot.IMG and the script from updater script for boot.IMG.....I will remove my ROMs on Tuesday morning....
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Dark4Droid said:
Just remove boot.IMG and the script from updater script for boot.IMG.....I will remove my ROMs on Tuesday morning....
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but without that how can rom will boot...
and every users dont hv d file??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Kinghacker said:
but without that how can rom will boot...
and every users dont hv d file??
Sent from my A9 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boot.IMG is already there on a android device......So it doesn't matter....But when it comes to different Android versions like ICS and JB...It will matter...Also on MIUI and LEWA too
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Ok guys I got a reply from Micromax
[FONT="]Dear Valued Customer,[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Thank you for your Email, we would like to inform you that we can not provide any [/FONT][FONT="]kernel source code from our end.[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]For any further Assistance and Query you can contact us on the Customer Support number given below:[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]18605008286[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]You can also log onto our website for information www.micromaxinfo.com[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Assuring you with best of our services and we value your association with us.[/FONT]
and my reply
Then who would I contact about the kernel source code for the devices. It is required by law that upon request the device OEM has to provide the source code. If they refuse Google can and has revoked the rights to use Android. Please provide me with who I must get into contact with concerning this.
I would suggest as many people that can do the same as I am doing.
zelendel said:
Ok guys I got a reply from Micromax
[FONT="]Dear Valued Customer,[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Thank you for your Email, we would like to inform you that we can not provide any [/FONT][FONT="]kernel source code from our end.[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]For any further Assistance and Query you can contact us on the Customer Support number given below:[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]18605008286[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]You can also log onto our website for information www.micromaxinfo.com[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Assuring you with best of our services and we value your association with us.[/FONT]
and my reply
Then who would I contact about the kernel source code for the devices. It is required by law that upon request the device OEM has to provide the source code. If they refuse Google can and has revoked the rights to use Android. Please provide me with who I must get into contact with concerning this.
I would suggest as many people that can do the same as I am doing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the exact same reply I said about bro....So what's next from our side???
Sent from my Micromax Canvas 2 using xda app-developers app
Next I await their reply about who to contact about it. I would advise people to start emailing them. Maybe drop a few tech sites the info and see if they will run a story about it. I am not saying spam the site. But don't just accept what they say. Push the issue.
Wayne Tech Nexus