Hi respected devs and users,
I hope there is a serious issue going around this forum,you guyz know that MMX is now selling canvas2 with jb out of the box.
You guyz @Dark4Droid @BOND1987 @sagarwep @andiroxu @bsuhas @mufti.arfan @bindassdost @khan_frd2002 @pratikmore @mmxandy @superdragonpt @varun.chitre15 and many more did a fantastic job by bringing the 4.2 to our device which was an almost impossible.
The issue is now the new canvas2 with 4.2 installed is not having a working rear cam.
As this is a forum for our beloved device we don't have a seperate section for the latest canvas2 variant,actually many users are suffering because of this and also many users will buy canvas2 in future.
I know that MMX don't care about even announcing the changes they made to the device as they always do,so as you devs are the only responsible for the miracle happened and happening to our device in this forum,so please kindly address this issue so that this forum may have many upcoming canvas2 supporters who buys the phone in future.
My kind request to users who have the canvas2 with rear cam not working to post a log cat while opening your camera in 4.2,so that it will be easy to find the actual issue.
You users can make this thread active by responding with proper log cats.its in your hands.
Thank you,
Showstopper1
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
poran123 said:
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google it.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Please find the solutin we need must waiting for resolution.... of cam
mufti.arfan said:
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
nightwalker said:
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
mufti.arfan said:
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
nightwalker said:
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The pre loaded one, and it's kernel compilation time, if that will be different than our it means kernel is new. If it's same then we can try libs from it, if that doesn't work either then its a hardware thingy.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
superdragonpt said:
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
(...). Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.(...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think that my no source is making you fool then it's to you.
Everybody is fair handsome here and know everything.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
New mmx have slight hardware change i guess or the kernel issue some one needs to share their device(or system libs) here so that devs can make a change
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!! As a member of A110 community you should be aware of this !!!
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
@superdragonpt & @andiroxu Stop it friends....Dont fight... Just understand we are fighting for Cheap[i didnt mean price] device.... Human relations is far better than Device Relations... I know i got plenty of friends because of MMX C2.... But Why fight for it? I agree both Varun and andiroxu have their own capablities,better leave them alone...
And @superdragonpt : Any Add-ons for 4.2 ? :laugh: More ROM's are on NR... I am using Xperia Messaging app on 4.2 :angel:
andiroxu said:
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro i have install the app but i didnt find any information about camera.... m using miui rom 4.1.2 and i dont have the backup of the original JB rom which came along with my phone
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Edit: I really don't understand in what sense comment of @superdragonpt sounds like a moderator?
mayur.3.92 said:
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buddy, let me tell you this:
Im not an MOD, but i can't stand people that STEALS, other's work, And what's worse is that he is CLAIMING it is his work.
You don't understand what we are talking about, and that's normal, the "normal" xda user don't understand this things, but believe me i know.
The normal xda user, just want RESULTS, and don't care about GPL and credits, and dont even imagine HOW MUCH WORK was involved.
The normal xda user, just come here, download and thats it!
@andiroxu Yes you have stolen varun's work. and you should be an shame of yourself.
Come on prove that im wrong, and upload your kernel sources...
But PLEASE don't repeat tha same trick you've done in your kernel thread when you uploaded FAKE sources.
I didnt wanted to come in public with this statments, i dont even own an micromax phone (my phone is an ZTE), but if there is something that gets on my nerves is this things.
I have an DEEPLY RESPECT with all the work that @varun.chitre15 have done, just like every other dev.
These devs are the reason we have custom roms and kernels, as an alternative to our stock ones.
varun.chitre15 said:
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ THIS.
Xtreme booster
works with any rom
boosts Performance
You're the dev who made it? No? Then give proper credits!
Warning: I would be very careful to flash something on my phone that is provided without any further explanation or source
OP: Please provide further info as to whether you have made that yourself or who the original developer is. If you did it yourself, please add some further information what it does exactly and how it works. If you didn't please add a link to the original thread for further information. Should you not do that in the next 24 hours I will close this thread and remove the download for security reasons.
It fixed lags of games like dead trigger 2 on my pico
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Thread closed
like announced 2 posts above for lack of information about the app.
Hi
What ROM is the best with performace & stability?
Link please
alta27 said:
Hi
What ROM is the best with performace & stability?
Link please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Banrom is the best!
Features:
- you learn how to respect the rules
- you learn to not ask for eta
- you learn to not ask for best rom
- you learn to respect others work
Best is you test the 24h demo version before you flash the fullversion
Sent from my mint using XDA Free mobile app
SdtBarbarossa said:
Banrom is the best!
Features:
- you learn how to respect the rules
- you learn to not ask for eta
- you learn to not ask for best rom
- you learn to respect others work
Best is you test the 24h demo version before you flash the fullversion
Sent from my mint using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Free market
Why I cant as for opinion of some users?
I tried some ROMS but even when they are "stable" they crash.
[ROM][XL][CM12.1] StryFlex™ LP v3.7 | Official Sony Lollipop UI
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xperia-l/development/rom-stryflex2013266073-lp-official-sony-t3178049
I think that the Latest Resurrection in Best. But you can try any of the ROM's . But there stock recoveries are broken and cannot flash a zip, atleast for me....