Related
Hey guys as many of us are aware, us relying on carriers and handset manufacturers to release os updates is almost pointless. There are many other devices that are ics capable yet won't be upgraded do to carriers and phone manufacturers. What the sgs2 community did was request drivers from qualcomm and they provided. I think with enough community support nvidia will as well. We are one driver away from complete ics goodness, no more crashes or bugs. I searched Google and saw that this community has already contacted nvidia here: http://forums.developer.nvidia.com/devforum/discussion/1726/tegra-2-source-code/p1 and here: http://forums.developer.nvidia.com/devforum/discussion/comment/3236?Sort=popular
So let's group together and work as a team to convince nvidia they will be doing a great service to our community, it will only strengthen their presence in the android community by doing so.
Any developers here have suggestions on persuading nvidia to support us and have them notice us? I think their dev forum is a good start, also social media may help. I wonder how many g2x owners are still out there?
lets make our voices heard and finish what we started.
Ya we tried, search around.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
mt3g said:
Ya we tried, search around.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly which means we need to keep trying
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
It does not hurt to try, plus it's free.
Have at it
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
mt3g said:
Have at it
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NVIDIA doesn't give a damn.
I tried, but I don't think Nvidia will really care.
Their revunue in 2010 is like 3.2billion..
I don't think our million $ of phone on XDA even matter to nVidia.
Nvidia doesnt give a ****... they never release binaries for their video cards or other hardware either regardless of countless requests...
Nvidia I think wont waste their tine on phones. they have graphic cards for pcs
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
JHaste said:
Nvidia doesnt give a ****... they never release binaries for their video cards or other hardware either regardless of countless requests...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, watch the language please. Kids use these forums too.
Mr. Apocalypse said:
Hey, watch the language please. Kids use these forums too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea and they are usually the ones that "brick" their phones and play ten thousand questions trying to fix it because they cant follow a simple guide... or make a thread when there are three threads on the same page addressing the same thing
I kept it PG13 anyway
Mr. Apocalypse said:
Hey, watch the language please. Kids use these forums too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You say that while your avatar is flipping us off!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
aloxotls said:
You say that while your avatar is flipping us off!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol didn't even realize that.
Anyways I tried as well way back when asking for drivers for the gTablet as well, Nvidia doesn't care. Hence why I'm going Samsung for phones, and ATI/AMD for graphics on the PC next time.
---------- Post added at 04:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:06 AM ----------
Quick edit, did anyone else notice the guy saying that Nvidia is trying to release the binaries for Tegra 2 Dual Cores in 2012? He posted this in November 2011:
Hello Android Development Community
We appreciate all the interest and passion surrounding the NVIDIA Tegra Platform and we take our support for the development community seriously. NVIDIA has been working with Google and Motorola to provide the open source community with the required drivers and other binary code to build full Android OS images for the Tegra 2 powered "Motorola Xoom". We expect Google to make those components available as part of the Android Open Source Project soon.
In addition, NVIDIA is working on a full release of Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) for our Tegra 2 Dual Core and Tegra 3 Quad Core reference devices to be made available early next year. This release package will comprise of binary code, drivers developed on our reference platforms and any patches necessary to ensure stability & performance with ICS. We hope the open source community can leverage this release for their work on all Tegra devices.
Andrew Edelsten
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I'm a little confused, why, then, is everyone worried about receiving these binaries? Or am I not reading this correctly?
Sorry for my ignorance, I do not know much about the driver development with regards to linux/android/ICS, going to google this a bit now.
aloxotls said:
You say that while your avatar is flipping us off!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's all right tho, he's flipping you off in a friendly manner
Mr. Apocalypse == very, very, nice & friendly guy
Mr. Apocalypse said:
That's all right tho, he's flipping you off in a friendly manner
Mr. Apocalypse == very, very, nice & friendly guy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only in public, he'll curse you a storm in pm's lol.
Just kidding he really is nice .
Core Memory said:
NVIDIA doesn't give a damn.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree... I'm not gonna stop him from wasting his time tough, especially if he is going to annoy a company I'm a little upset with lol.
mt3g said:
I agree... I'm not gonna stop him from wasting his time tough, especially if he is going to annoy a company I'm a little upset with lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same issue has been beaten to death on XDA and elsewhere. I am pissed-off that those who newly raise this issue haven't done their homework, they just ignorantly post what has already been dealt with and are using up/wasting bandwidth and storage. The same for others who ask without researching/looking first to determine if the answer to their question exists before they ask. I've stopped answering questions which have been answered many times already. That may be perceived by some as arrogant/harsh/mean/etc. but that's OK, they can keep answering the same questions over and over and over and over and over... again.
Core Memory said:
The same issue has been beaten to death on XDA and elsewhere. I am pissed-off that those who newly raise this issue haven't done their homework, they just ignorantly post what has already been dealt with and are using up/wasting bandwidth and storage. The same for others who ask without researching/looking first to determine if the answer to their question exists before they ask. I've stopped answering questions which have been answered many times already. That may be perceived by some as arrogant/harsh/mean/etc. but that's OK, they can keep answering the same questions over and over and over and over and over... again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this sounds like a rant that i approve of!
JHaste said:
this sounds like a rant that i approve of!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've made many post about this that I wish mods would step in and just conjoin all the "ics" and "f u LG" threads all into one 2000 post thread, the mods barely do anything here.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
mt3g said:
I've made many post about this that I wish mods would step in and just conjoin all the "ics" and "f u LG" threads all into one 2000 post thread, the mods barely do anything here.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes sir, that's why we vote you to be mod haha.
Party on Wayne, party on Garth!
*Sarcastic Idiotic Voice* WHY IS THAR NO WIFI CALLING! Ur gettin' repurt!
*Back to serious poker faces* Glad to see Jelly Bean have a preview on our device. Oh btw Erik you haven't answered my question yet, would you like a Google Play gift card?
th3controller said:
*Sarcastic Idiotic Voice* WHY IS THAR NO WIFI CALLING! Ur gettin' repurt!
*Back to serious poker faces* Glad to see Jelly Bean have a preview on our device. Oh btw Erik you haven't answered my question yet, would you like a Google Play gift card?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol nah just rape n abuse the thanks button
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
erikmm said:
Lol nah just rape n abuse the thanks button
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find that offensive and I may need to report you. I was a thanks button in a previous life.
Guess who polished an Op post!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=35370542&postcount=11
So much softer to read
I'll talk to you on irc later today to see if i can find a fix for sound
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Got source?
airfluip1 said:
Got source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet I'm hoping this weekend after finals :/
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Yeah, I'd be able to find a sound fix if I did.
How's the battery life compared to ics? I'm guessing its around the same because it has nearly the same kernel
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app
Better on the battery, since wifi doesn't work.
Once wifi gets fixed, it should be about the same again.
Just a side note installing an ICS KERNEL like hefe will earn you a boot loop, so don't unless you like that sort of thing.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app
airfluip1 said:
Got source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
erikmm said:
Not yet I'm hoping this weekend after finals :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bot42 said:
Just a side note installing an ICS KERNEL like hefe will earn you a boot loop, so don't unless you like that sort of thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As soon as erik gets the source posted somewhere, it will receive some teamacid luv.
It's funny, because I started looking at a herring port last weekend, and then saw the dev thread erik started and stopped.
i am somewhat sure that I may be able to fix sound issues.
erikmm said:
Not yet I'm hoping this weekend after finals :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bhundven said:
As soon as erik gets the source posted somewhere, it will receive some teamacid luv.
It's funny, because I started looking at a herring port last weekend, and then saw the dev thread erik started and stopped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its funny I remember the last time source code was not posted when promised devs got upset and there was a huge dog-pile.
Per the rules here at xda source code should be posted. When can links be expected? .
By posting your work on XDA-Developers, you are agreeing that it complies with relevant licensing conditions. As such, by posting a kernel or other work containing GPL code, you are confirming to us that you have made this source code available publicly under the GPL, and should highlight this in your thread with a link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
eollie said:
Its funny I remember the last time source code was not posted when promised devs got upset and there was a huge dog-pile.
Per the rules here at xda source code should be posted. When can links be expected? .
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's no secret you have a beef with Erik, but really, going to try and call out "no source link", for an alpha build, when he's said he will get source for everyone to work with. If you are going to be that much of a stickler, then you better go through the ROM thread and find EVERY ROM that doesn't have a source link in the thread.
Seriously, go through every single ROM and post in that thread your little XDA link and quote, because otherwise it's shows your being petty against Erik and you're mad because the mod's keep deleting your posts or closing threads every time you start something. I just looked and saw 10 ROM's without source linked without even looking at Erik's releases, so go report all them too and post your quote.
He is not referring to ROM'S and ports, rather the kernel and CM10. er1kmm is NOT keeping it from people for malicious reasons. To imply otherwise is childish.You don't see ANYONE from TFQ releasing ANYTHING CM10. Please stop asking for ETA's. Grow up and stop whining.
Sent from a hole in the time/space continuum.
Actually this is something that is suppose to be released when the thread is started. So this eta is a valid one. It would be nice to have this code available so other people can look to see if they can fix stuff. I dont care when I beta release is made, I just care to see the source code posted. That is not a unreasonable request. This is a pretty major release and I know others are chomping at the bit to get it to start trying to fix some things.
eollie said:
Actually this is something that is suppose to be released when the thread is started. So this eta is a valid one. It would be nice to have this code available so other people can look to see if they can fix stuff. I dont care when I beta release is made, I just care to see the source code posted. That is not a unreasonable request. This is a pretty major release and I know others are chomping at the bit to get it to start trying to fix some things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, just maybe, there is something going on in er1kmm's personal life. I honestly don't know. Real life comes before XDA. Be yourself, report it, have any and all threads regarding CM10 deleted (including bhundven's which has been proven false, and his is now an "any other thread").
Edit: Not false, just no longer relevant.
I am not defending or going against anyone here, but the reason that I am asking for source is because I feel that once we have source, we will be able to fix a ton of issues. The more devs/helpers, the better.
And I am quite sure, since erik has promised us source, it'll be here soon enough.
[Petition] LG and T-Mobile: Update the T-Mobile G2x (LG P999) to Android 4.x
Dear Friends and G2x Owners,
If you not aware and following the lgforum.com, we started a petition to help our voices get heard to have an Android 4.x update to the G2x:
Here is the petition:
https://www.change.org/petitions/lg-and-t-mobile-update-the-lg-g2x-lg-p999-to-android-4-x
, and here is the thread in lgforum.com:
http://support.lgforum.com/lg/topic...t_android_4_0_ics_for_our_g2xs#reply_11874702
, and also at T-Mobile:
http://support.t-mobile.com/message/234150#234150
Please help yourselves, help all of us by signing it and also sharing this petition, spreading our words everywhere.
Much appreciated, thank you all!
For all of us G2X owners I sincerely hope this does make a difference. I wouldn't hold my breath, but then again no one thought the Optimus 2X was going to get it either.
Again, good luck to all. I may switched to an S3 for my main phone, but my G2X was much more fun to play with.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
penguin5897 said:
For all of us G2X owners I sincerely hope this does make a difference. I wouldn't hold my breath, but then again no one thought the Optimus 2X was going to get it either.
Again, good luck to all. I may switched to an S3 for my main phone, but my G2X was much more fun to play with.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel the same way. I just adore my Nexus 4, but there's something about the G2X that I just don't feel with my N4. Might aswell try this petition out then.
I won't held any hopes for this device anymore.
Thanks for the best community that g2x had.
With all due respect, I won't put my name on anything with such poor grammar. Good luck!
If you're talking about the petition... I'm sorry I kind of made it on the fly but please support it anyways. I'm sure you understand the petitions message despite its grammar issues. Don't be a grammar nazi were just trying to help out this poor device.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
DGpro said:
If you're talking about the petition... I'm sorry I kind of made it on the fly but please support it anyways. I'm sure you understand the petitions message despite its grammar issues. Don't be a grammar nazi were just trying to help out this poor device.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let us not worry about the grammar shall we. But the phone... I say if you are not happy with it then sell it to some sucker and go buy another to ***** about.
Just my g2x.
I would have a $500 brick if it weren't for nvflash. Thanks Nvidia!
All,
OK, the LG G2x Petition has also being posted to the Twitter Sphere:
Twitter #LG #G2x Petition @ LGUSAMobile
https://twitter.com/khamikazes/status/329360240216776705
Share and give love. Please sign it and help spread the word.
Thank you very much.
PS: 37 signatures and growing!!!
i just signed, so i figured i would bump this thread. plz guys i know the current attitude is "i give up" but i think we can get lg to do something for us even if tmobile wont. lg has update software for a reason.lol lets get it done! 43 signatures. lets shoot for 200 and see what happens.
grantusmantus said:
i just signed, so i figured i would bump this thread. plz guys i know the current attitude is "i give up" but i think we can get lg to do something for us even if tmobile wont. lg has update software for a reason.lol lets get it done! 43 signatures. lets shoot for 200 and see what happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may work faster with fake email accounts and name... I'm just saying you know.
I would have a $500 brick if it weren't for nvflash. Thanks Nvidia!
@grantusmantus. Now that's the kind of spirit we need here! Thank you for the support!
@mansa_noob That's actually not a bad idea thanks for sharing
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
mansa_noob said:
It may work faster with fake email accounts and name... I'm just saying you know.
I would have a $500 brick if it weren't for nvflash. Thanks Nvidia!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This post alone is enough to cancel the petition, we need 200 real unsatisfied customers, why would LG do something they already don't wanna do if 50% of the people signed are fake and they would do a google search and they would find this.
iLovPieNCake said:
This post alone is enough to cancel the petition, we need 200 real unsatisfied customers, why would LG do something they already don't wanna do if 50% of the people signed are fake and they would do a google search and they would find this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was joking man...
-- The noob says:
For a dead guy the g2x sure kicks a lot!
Sorry I wasn't trying to be mean. Just LG and third party devs/ customers have a very "crappy" relationship.
iLovPieNCake said:
Sorry I wasn't trying to be mean. Just LG and third party devs/ customers have a very "crappy" relationship.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problemo.
-- The noob says:
Believe you me... Apple suggested LG for Nexus 4
Just wanted to bump and say the petition is currently at 112 signatures ^^
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
DGpro said:
Just wanted to bump and say the petition is currently at 112 signatures ^^
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How many are expected to generate a response?
-- The noob says:
I watched in horror the CM7 boot screen after my g2x rebooted during a phone interview!
mansa_noob said:
How many are expected to generate a response?
-- The noob says:
I watched in horror the CM7 boot screen after my g2x rebooted during a phone interview!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest I have no idea. RyanLG, the LG representative over at the LG forums, told me he sent the petition link along with some pdf's I created (that contained the signatures and comments) to his superiors. That was about like 12 days ago and I asked him about a day ago if there was any news but he still hasn't replied. All I can say is that the more the better but in the end its all up to LG if they want to respond at all.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
To be honest I have no idea. RyanLG, the LG representative over at the LG forums, told me he sent the petition link along with some pdf's I created (that contained the signatures and comments) to his superiors. That was about like 12 days ago and I asked him about a day ago if there was any news but he still hasn't replied. All I can say is that the more the better but in the end its all up to LG if they want to respond at all.<br />
<br />
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what its worth, I signed it just now.
-- The noob says:
I watched in horror the CM7 boot screen after my g2x rebooted during a phone interview!
khamikaze said:
[Petition] LG and T-Mobile: Update the T-Mobile G2x (LG P999) to Android 4.x
Dear Friends and G2x Owners,
If you not aware and following the lgforum.com, we started a petition to help our voices get heard to have an Android 4.x update to the G2x:
Here is the petition:
https://www.change.org/petitions/lg-and-t-mobile-update-the-lg-g2x-lg-p999-to-android-4-x
, and here is the thread in lgforum.com:
http://support.lgforum.com/lg/topic...t_android_4_0_ics_for_our_g2xs#reply_11874702
, and also at T-Mobile:
http://support.t-mobile.com/message/234150#234150
Please help yourselves, help all of us by signing it and also sharing this petition, spreading our words everywhere.
Much appreciated, thank you all!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope you guys are all ready because I swear on my life I'm getting my whole school to sign and sponsor this.
---------- Post added at 09:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:18 PM ----------
LiLTrippz said:
I hope you guys are all ready because I swear on my life I'm getting my whole school to sign and sponsor this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take this stuff seriously and I don't joke around, LG better make us 4.x for the lg g2x I put my word on the table over 2000 people will vote this today or tomorrow.
Hello to all,
I am here today to ask you why the Samsung does not release the source code, have been released for the Galaxy SIII Mini which has the same processor Novator U8500 and why but we do not have anything yet, maybe it will be a topic a bit useless but if you know why do not hesitate to write
Edit. The source code are here: Source Code for GT-I9070 and GT-I9070P
I think they know about that... and I presume these are not the sources they are looking for..
Nice, but I think that devs has knowledge about this... I think that those drivers are not enough for some issues in CM-based ROMs.
They'd have probably know this before hand
Miky500 said:
Hello to all,
I am here today to ask you why the Samsung does not release the source code, have been released for the Galaxy SIII Mini which has the same processor Novator U8500 and why but we do not have anything yet, maybe it will be a topic a bit useless but if you know why do not hesitate to write
Edit. The source code are here: Source Code for GT-I9070 and GT-I9070P
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are the kernel sources not the cpu sources. Novathor is from st ericsson and not from samsung. Samsung must relase the kernel sources because android is open source but ste is free to relase or not their cpu sources
Inviato dal mio GT-I9070 con Tapatalk 2
Not to mention, the galaxy s3 mini has a novathor, but of a different series. Not U8500.
Sent from my GT-I9070
Let's Spam OSRC TEAM / Request for New Kernel Source Code for Galaxy S Advance device
Looks like we do not need a special thread to make a request the source code of the kernel, to TIM OSRC samsung, because there is already a thread that has been recommended by the engine of this forum when I was trying to make a new thread. Perhaps you can do to participate as well. Here ....!!!
And also you can report the latest results of our efforts in this thread too, I guess. Hopefully it can become a reality.
Regards.
It's a great idea to spam Sammy in request for the newest sources...sinces they have had the chance to update the kernel recently (compiled in January, released in Jule almost August?? sounds fishy...) They maybe know something we don't...maybe theres official kitkat after all...hell maybe theres Android L at the end of the tunnel, yeah i'm specula...i'm fantasizing...but i don't really see why suddenly update a device that is EOL since 4.1.2, 2 years ago.
We have the sources the user from china uploaded here on new year's eve but i thing no one has used them...or has used them to rewrite their own from scratch....so maybe new sources directly from samsung is both legally and perfomance wise for our phone.
Novafusion guys (maclaw) started spam sammy with an "example" message, and apparently it worked...i don't know if they have something new but they got a letter from sammy saying they would update sources.
I think the best way would be that...create a message that we just C&P spammin Sammy OSRC till they release something, but then again, just my 2 cents.
LtDementhial said:
It's a great idea to spam Sammy in request for the newest sources...sinces they have had the chance to update the kernel recently (compiled in January, released in Jule almost August?? sounds fishy...) They maybe know something we don't...maybe theres official kitkat after all...hell maybe theres Android L at the end of the tunnel, yeah i'm specula...i'm fantasizing...but i don't really see why suddenly update a device that is EOL since 4.1.2, 2 years ago.
We have the sources the user from china uploaded here on new year's eve but i thing no one has used them...or has used them to rewrite their own from scratch....so maybe new sources directly from samsung is both legally and perfomance wise for our phone.
Novafusion guys (maclaw) started spam sammy with an "example" message, and apparently it worked...i don't know if they have something new but they got a letter from sammy saying they would update sources.
I think the best way would be that...create a message that we just C&P spammin Sammy OSRC till they release something, but then again, just my 2 cents.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that we need NovaThor sources (ST Ericsson), and they does not exist anymore.
shut_down said:
I think that we need NovaThor sources (ST Ericsson), and they does not exist anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am aware of that also, problem is, who can we ask for sources...best case scenario Sammy releases their ST sources, but theres the legal barrier that altough neither Ericcson nor STMicroelectronics are taking liability of both the sources and the R&D invested, Novathor and all things related are now a STMicroelectronics product...and they are having a hard time.
From my PPOV, STM is gonna keed everything closed, use it later to make a new plataform (i think theyre with NEC now or some Chinese subsidiary in a joint venture), i really don't know if after a time of not using the plataform or by being cancelled they have to legally open their sources...or if theres a "expiration date" on them.
Since Sammy uses Novathor in 3 or 4 phones and Sony used it in almost all their phones in 2012(?) we are left with whats being already used.
I don't have any knowledge about the content of the leaked sources from the Xperia forum that the guy from China uploaded but i thought for a while they were just as good as our devs had already built isn't?
LtDementhial said:
I am aware of that also, problem is, who can we ask for sources...best case scenario Sammy releases their ST sources, but theres the legal barrier that altough neither Ericcson nor STMicroelectronics are taking liability of both the sources and the R&D invested, Novathor and all things related are now a STMicroelectronics product...and they are having a hard time.
From my PPOV, STM is gonna keed everything closed, use it later to make a new plataform (i think theyre with NEC now or some Chinese subsidiary in a joint venture), i really don't know if after a time of not using the plataform or by being cancelled they have to legally open their sources...or if theres a "expiration date" on them.
Since Sammy uses Novathor in 3 or 4 phones and Sony used it in almost all their phones in 2012(?) we are left with whats being already used.
I don't have any knowledge about the content of the leaked sources from the Xperia forum that the guy from China uploaded but i thought for a while they were just as good as our devs had already built isn't?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure that STMicroelectronics cares much about Android anymore, other competitors didn't won anything from competing against Qualcomm and Samsung (with the Exynos), because they haven't done any major advances in performance or power consumption, also, Google strongly favors Qualcomm CPUs, they even use them on their Nexus devices for the most part (except Nexus 7 I think, because it uses NVIDIA Tegra, if I remember correctly), hope you remember Texas Instruments, big player, choosed to part ways with Android and most of their ARM stuff.
I wrote this on the other thread requesting kernel source. Unless Samsung has the igloo 3.4 kernel converted/hacked to work on janice (which was a rumor when we heard that was preparing a 4.2/4.3 OTA) hidden somewhere in Korea and they release that, not sure anything they could release would made a major impact on performance or battery duration.
What we are missing? Hm, a proper RIL (that is not the one I made, but should work with most Samsung libril.so's), and maybe some access to the Samsung Secondary bootloader (they won't release that even if they were drunk and on drugs)
Hey guys, it seems our efforts succeed.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
TPD-21 said:
Hey guys, it seems our efforts succeed.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@TPD-21 Yesterday I also received this mail by Samsung but don't you think these sources are old!!!
Tell me fast !
I replied sammy again and i got reply.What to reply them again?
jadega said:
@TPD-21 Yesterday I also received this mail by Samsung but don't you think these sources are old!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not think so. I have noticed before, that the source code from the list of site pages OSRC there are only 20 sources for variant GT-I9070. And with the addition of a new source code told by them yesterday via email, the list has now become 21 source code.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 03:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:47 PM ----------
Force said:
I replied sammy again and i got reply.What to reply them again?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm ... I guess you could ask them something more specific, perhaps my friends. If I see from their reply, it seems not so clear about what you mean from the email you send to them.
But, if what you ask is the same as what I or other users who ask here before as well, I think you can ignore the reply from their email.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
TPD-21 said:
I do not think so. I have noticed before, that the source code from the list of site pages OSRC there are only 20 sources for variant GT-I9070. And with the addition of a new source code told by them yesterday via email, the list has now become 21 source code.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
---------- Post added at 03:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:47 PM ----------
Hmmm ... I guess you could ask them something more specific, perhaps my friends. If I see from their reply, it seems not so clear about what you mean from the email you send to them.
But, if what you ask is the same as what I or other users who ask here before as well, I think you can ignore the reply from their email.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So does this means a new kernal can be compiled for our device just like S3 mini???
But what kind of kernel does s3 mini have?! Isn't it just a 3.0.x kernel built from Samsung sources??
It will be merged with CM11 Sourch like what said by frapeti
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
TPD-21 said:
Hey guys, it seems our efforts succeed.
Sent from my Nokia-3315 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@TPD-21 Since we have received new source code for our device , is there any development going on using these new sources
jadega said:
@TPD-21 Since we have received new source code for our device , is there any development going on using these new sources
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys, before I answer your questions and refer to those concerned about the (current) of course. There are some things we have to think about it together. namely:
1. Our developers for now almost many are turning to other devices. It was miserable.
2 Only a few people (or more) that has a device janice from the developers had in this forum.
3 For this moment (maybe) we will still get a ROM update for Janice (Either Codina), but it was developed without a device (Surely "Janice experiment") is supposed by the developer. This is ironic. You can imagine how a carpenter make a house without equipment repairman? It was impossible guys!.
4 Related to your question above, then that should answer that, perhaps @Rox or @Paul L.
5. Honestly I will feel less excited again for a peek every thread of this forum, immediately after hearing the news that uncomfortable. Sorry for that. :angel:
Oh, yes, don't forget to always hope for the good of Janice. Because I've always believed in the magic of his.
##############################
Due to stolen by TeamCanjica sources, we had to open our stolen sources.
Please, hate on them. They have broken law. I understand everything, but stealing sources is most last thing I would ever think about.
And say also “thanks” to thehacka1, who gave them access to our sources.
You’re reported everywhere. Better remove our sources right now.
Our sources will be published as soon as these bastards will get what they deserve.
Funny behaviour – you cannot do something yourself, then you stole it.
MacławStudio
http://maclaw.pl/2014/01/22/open-sources/
##############################
Oww? is this true? teamcanjica stolen the source of Maclaw??
Wow...... I know some users are a little bit annoyed because Maclaw closed his source. But that is not the way how to solve that problem. It's against the rule dude
ichiyamato said:
##############################
Due to stolen by TeamCanjica sources, we had to open our stolen sources.
Please, hate on them. They have broken law. I understand everything, but stealing sources is most last thing I would ever think about.
And say also “thanks” to thehacka1, who gave them access to our sources.
You’re reported everywhere. Better remove our sources right now.
Our sources will be published as soon as these bastards will get what they deserve.
Funny behaviour – you cannot do something yourself, then you stole it.
MacławStudio
http://maclaw.pl/2014/01/22/open-sources/
##############################
Oww? is this true? teamcanjica stolen the source of Maclaw??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's true. He posted twice about the stolen source though... TeamCanjica should be ashamed of what they're doing.
First rule: don't believe in all you read on Internet. And thehacka1 is not TC MEMBER.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
tomgv said:
First rule: don't believe in all you read on Internet. And thehacka1 is not TC MEMBER.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't entirely believe it, since I thought they were working really well together and now this comes up ._.
https://github.com/TeamCanjica/andr...mmit/148624785600669fedd2ee52b78f21c57d2aff31
See it. It's about OMX fixes for Kitkat. I don't known who is right. You also can see about thehacka1
https://github.com/thehacka1/android_frameworks_native/commits/cm-11.0
thehacka1 had DDos to server of Maclaw to steal source i think it's a bad job. And about Maclaw Studio is say them will public source when it is clean
Marcin says:
As you can see, it's not well-organised yet and we just wanted to improve some things before public release, why we haven't done this yet? We have a private life, school, work etc. but unfortunely mr. thehacka must have destroyed our plans and leaked the current version which probably won't even work by the way.
I'm not even angry anymore, I'm just sad because community is doing everything to destroy our trust in them. Leaking WIP and DDoSing our servers? Seems like fun.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope it can stop in peace
I only know little about it. My english is so bad, If wrong please ignore for me
p/s: I think TC not do it. it only a commit and a members was merged it
First dont make thread for that...
Second guys stfu!
We dont know all the story/problems so we cant talk..
Users(me too) opinions are useless....so stop talk about that..
asdfzz said:
First dont make thread for that...
Second guys stfu!
We dont know all the story/problems so we cant talk..
Users(me too) opinions are useless....so stop talk about that..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes okay but we can share what we feel about this, cause this could massively affect development of the ace 2. If you don't like sharing then you don't have to look at this thread
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Basically, from what I know, TC and TheHacka1 "stole" some sources (not really the right word).
Put it this way, Maclaw took open sources, tweeked them and then made them closed sources so TC couldn't get to them. Which as far as I am aware, that's against the law as android is an open source project.
So basically, to put it simply, it was Maclaws fault.
EDIT: Stole is the wrong word. According to Rox, a member of Maclaws team let them into his website.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
pinhead97 said:
Yes okay but we can share what we feel about this, cause this could massively affect development of the ace 2. If you don't like sharing then you don't have to look at this thread
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? This thread? I can see that "what we feel" on at least 3 thread
And probably no one care about what we feel since we have nothing to do
asdfzz said:
Really? This thread? I can see that "what we feel" on at least 3 thread
And probably no one care about what we feel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that it probably is wrong to discuss on the dev threads, and no one does care about our opinions, but its a good place to share what we think about it with other people who feel the same way. Like it or not this is a big issue, we can't just stay silent as if it never happened
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
You got cm11, one rox's one maclaw. All you think about is how TC should be shameful? You better stop using rox's roms then. Go buy an s3 mini and stay out of our way. You make us ace 2 users feel ashamed.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
Stop now, I know i don't have the right but we all just be a bystander can't know right and wrong. Do not make things more confusing, Listen and follow-up, i really think the rox or maclaw they were among the best developed for ace 2. This may be a misunderstanding i really want the two man continued to work for us :laugh::laugh:
Sorry my bad english
TheHacka1 "stole" the source code from Maclaw and TC take what TheHacka1 "offer" I don't think it's stealing. Because one of the member Maclaw betrayed(?) their team....let's just forget this:fingers-crossed:
Really? I'm very sad to hear it
Stupid topic....
What is wrong with? Do you really care about who developed rom for you? If is working perfectly = you are happy user if not=you are sad user. Only few % peple ask who is developer. Get life.
Chill people
Wysłane z mojego GT-I8160 przy użyciu Tapatalka
Agreed in 100% with @mateuszcom
If You want to banish him, just use PM button, not "new topic".
? Wysłane z Ace'a II ?
Yes ... Finally... Don't talk about this in dev thread but this thread
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
Okay, so someone should close this thread already. I mean, it's getting in everyone's nerves the more we say out our thoughts. Obviously, people have different thoughts about it and I must say there are some "true" points in this thread, but I should agree that we should've not discussing such thing here. Just hoping the best for them (TC, Maclaw, and other people involved) and the development of CM11 for Ace II keeps on going
Stupid wars... both teams should work together to improve firmware for our loved ACE II