Related
M creating this thread as m sick of seeing noob people polluting the development thread just for the "nice work , congrats ,will flash it,good work,will be waiting for stable realese" blah blah blah.......n repoting small irrelevent problems too..........
so watever u have to say use this thread n keep the development thread clean..............so that the devs can build it easily.....
thanx for reading n understanding !!!!! we hope ur cooperation!!!!!
Hello Sachin ,
If you can please answer the following questions then it would be very helpful
1) Why is it very Difficult to develop a cyanogen mod or Miui (How do the devs go about the process) ?
2) Can you give some details about porting roms (I know dsixda's Kitchen has an option of porting and i does a very basic porting) ? once its ported using dsixda's Kitchen which tool is used for debugging for the errors which follow ?
3) Is there any other method of porting Rom's which is better ?
mdaamir1989 said:
Hello Sachin ,
If you can please answer the following questions then it would be very helpful
1) Why is it very Difficult to develop a cyanogen mod or Miui (How do the devs go about the process) ?
2) Can you give some details about porting roms (I know dsixda's Kitchen has an option of porting and i does a very basic porting) ? once its ported using dsixda's Kitchen which tool is used for debugging for the errors which follow ?
3) Is there any other method of porting Rom's which is better ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
answer 1: there no proper source files for cm7 n miui thats y its very difficult ro make a stable version of em n the files we have r broken n even no documentatiion for them that's its difficult!!!! secondly lack of developers is also a main reason if team samsung wud have taken the work on their hands we wud have gotten cm7/miui by now....but unfortunately our devices are not so popular!!!!
2: check this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1168916
you can use dsidia itself it has a option for checkin errors n for the bugs u have to corect them urslf by using brain like if some procees giving error replace its files with another rom's file!!!! thats wat i know if there is sumthing more i cant tell u as i dont know abt it
3: yes there is see this http://android.modaco.com/topic/348695-guide-how-to-port-a-rom/ and this http://www.freeyourandroid.com/guide/porting-android
n lastly thanku for using this thread n not bugging the development thread!!!
Thank you for the reply .
hello, I would even know the difference between the cyanogen mod 7 and the cyanogen mod 9? thanks
nicolas91280 said:
hello, I would even know the difference between the cyanogen mod 7 and the cyanogen mod 9? thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Major difference is that cm7 is based on gingerbread and cm9 is based on ice cream sandwich 4.0.3
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
Ok thanks devillhell007 but performance level which is best?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
nicolas91280 said:
Ok thanks devillhell007 but performance level which is best?
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android 4.0.3. Don't flash as its not stable enough yet unless you want to test
Cheers
Sent from my i9003 powered by Cyanogenmod 7
Some suggestions...
The stock launcher does not provide the facility for wallpaper scrolling ... and is preaty mush lagie....so u can install apex launcher......its fast nd provide more flexibility...
Guys i was thinking to upload video for every cm9 with every update....discussion problems...whts nd what is not.....
Some more small problems.....
I m using it as my daily rom......known issues r known but some more minnor isues..
Wall paper scrolling...on stock launcher....using apex launcher but facing problem with widgets.....contacts problem....not able to show contacts directly from sim.....have to import to phone first(nt a big issue)...but when u sync ur google account....ur google saved contacts r shown....i dnt know why my account is showing a single contact 8 to 9 times....if u go to display options...nd unselect google contacts....u r left with 0 contacts.........nd if u go nd select show all contacts it will show u ur google contacts with...ur sim contacts.....the problem is sim is also messing up with google account.....solution-go to settings.....account setting....remove ur google accouny...then again sign in...then immediately go to settings then account settings nd dis sellect sync contacts..... ..
Can anyone just provide link for facebook sync...which i can copy to system...i need facebook synced for ma mobile.......or just can i copu it from stock rom system......???
ayush95gupta said:
Can anyone just provide link for facebook sync...which i can copy to system...i need facebook synced for ma mobile.......or just can i copu it from stock rom system......???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just use the facebook app from market to sync all contacts ,have you tried it ??
And il flash the rom when i reach home on wed then il maybe be of more help
I tested it for a couple of hours. And was better than I expected, the phone was working reallly fast and smooth.
The most annoying bug/issue was that my Wifi wasn't working well, I couldn't find my Network.
I'll read about news, this'll be one of the best roms.
There is a quick and dirty fix for that. Just add a network manually, then scan. it works fine that way.
Indeed, ICS is very stable and fast on i9003, the biggest issue is probably Camera/Video.
Also, just as with CM7, no forms of tethering work. I use easytether.
how to enable the soft keys ?
a question, I can swap the internal-external sd?
(with vold.fstab gingerbred)
Nikscas said:
a question, I can swap the internal-external sd?
(with vold.fstab gingerbred)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think you can because that is for gingerbread and this is ICS
Nikscas said:
a question, I can swap the internal-external sd?
(with vold.fstab gingerbred)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope you cant
Cheers
Sent from my i9003 powered by Cyanogenmod 7
It's so nice to see how this great ROM that is Cyanogen is developing, when i first get my I9003 i though there was little modding for this smartphone, thanks to Zeus it isn't like that!
I come from a Defy and this is my first Samsung.
I would like to know if anybody knows how often are nighties or kangs released or where i can find 'em
why there is no /system/usr/idc/mxt224_ts_input.idc in cm9?
and
does deleting 00 android from /system/lib/egl/egl.cfg and keeping it to 0 1 POWERVR_SGX530_125 improve graphic performance?
Weird problem.. unable to download anything from either market or stock browser.. the downloading bar appears but nothing gets downloaded.. surfing is ok.. just no downloads.. there is free space in sd card..
Problem on wifi and 2g as well as 3g internet..
Downloads were fine the last time i installed cm9 for testing..
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
https://github.com/aquila-dev/mt6577_FULL_AOSP_SOURCE
Just.. enjoy
The device tree is on mediatek/config
The kernel is a 3.0.13 one
This is ICS 4.0.4 aosp
Use the makeMtk command to build an image
I didn't post it on "A110 Original Android Development" category because it's not an original source... it has been leaked from an other device "mytqu-832" codename baoxue.
I found it after many hours of searching in mediatek leaked documents on chinese website (i don't speak chinese [neither read]).. then i searched on github by taping the localpath of a mediatek specific config file.. and found that ! :3
And because all smartphones are now just SoC.. a lots of things (if not everything) found here should perfectly work on a110 and king.
[EDIT: March 2014]
Github restore my repo (so the first link works again) o/ I absolutly don't know why, but that's great !
If needed varunchitre15 forked it:
https://github.com/varunchitre15/mytqu-832
PREVIOUS EDIT:
The repo has been take down by a DMCA request..
And since the complete folder takes 8GB and my upload is at 60kB/s... this will take a long to reupload it.
I juste take the most interesting part (mediatek folder) which takes 800MB uncompressed, and it's already on mega:
https://mega.co.nz/#!BwZ1iT6B!JJp9Q2FCATKEaTWWWRI85RE-tJU_fp-S4XYXtHp5QVY
(use 7zip to extract it.. i think it should work)
The other parts (kernel/framework/prebuilt/external) will follow soon.. (3.2GB compressed to upload, will take something like 15hours to upload..)
PS: PLEASE !!!! if u're porting cyanogen and you already made significant work on the port.. (like a bootable build) Send me a message, i'm very busy, i can't work for it, but keep interrest for it. Please also don't send me private message like "how to compile the kernel.."
Well done, for finding this... will be helpful .. :thumbup:
Sent from my Cynus T2 using xda app-developers app
aquila-dev said:
https:// github.com /aquila-dev/mt6577_FULL_AOSP_SOURCE
Just.. enjoy
The device tree is on mediatek/config
The kernel is a 3.0.13 one
This is ICS 4.0.4 aosp
Use the makeMtk command to build an image
I didn't post it on "A110 Original Android Development" category because it's not an original source... it has been leaked from an other device "mytqu-832" codename baoxue.
I found it after many hours of searching in mediatek leaked documents on chinese website (i don't speak chinese [neither read]).. then i searched on github by taping the localpath of a mediatek specific config file.. and found that ! :3
And because all smartphones are now just a SoC.. a lots of things (if not everything) found here should perfectly work on a110 and king.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, is it the MTK's ALPS source??
I'm asking it bcoz only ALPS builds supports dual sims(i think).
Also baidu.com hosted several files on setting up the ALPS build environment......
You seem to be good in finding stuff
Will be useful in building CM9
See if you can find JB sources as well
Btw if you find kernel sources for MT6589, you can pm me
I am planning to buy the Micromax A116 but only if I get sources
aquila-dev said:
https:// github.com /aquila-dev/mt6577_FULL_AOSP_SOURCE
Just.. enjoy
The device tree is on mediatek/config
The kernel is a 3.0.13 one
This is ICS 4.0.4 aosp
Use the makeMtk command to build an image
I didn't post it on "A110 Original Android Development" category because it's not an original source... it has been leaked from an other device "mytqu-832" codename baoxue.
I found it after many hours of searching in mediatek leaked documents on chinese website (i don't speak chinese [neither read]).. then i searched on github by taping the localpath of a mediatek specific config file.. and found that ! :3
And because all smartphones are now just a SoC.. a lots of things (if not everything) found here should perfectly work on a110 and king.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GREAT !!!! :victory:
balamu96m said:
Well, is it the MTK's ALPS source??
I'm asking it bcoz only ALPS builds supports dual sims(i think).
Also baidu.com hosted several files on setting up the ALPS build environment......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it supports the dual sim feature.
#
# MTK Build Info
#
MTK_BRANCH = ALPS.ICS2.MP
MTK_BUILD_VERNO = ALPS.ICS2.MP.V1.26
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aquila-dev said:
Yes it supports the dual sim feature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!
Bro can you start building cm9
aquila-dev said:
https://github.com/aquila-dev/mt6577_FULL_AOSP_SOURCE
Just.. enjoy
The device tree is on mediatek/config
The kernel is a 3.0.13 one
This is ICS 4.0.4 aosp
Use the makeMtk command to build an image
I didn't post it on "A110 Original Android Development" category because it's not an original source... it has been leaked from an other device "mytqu-832" codename baoxue.
I found it after many hours of searching in mediatek leaked documents on chinese website (i don't speak chinese [neither read]).. then i searched on github by taping the localpath of a mediatek specific config file.. and found that ! :3
And because all smartphones are now just SoC.. a lots of things (if not everything) found here should perfectly work on a110 and king.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With full source in hand, kindly start cm9 compiling process.....:silly:
btw, when i try to clone in windows they say source may be corrupted..any tip bro?:fingers-crossed:
nexi4droid said:
With full source in hand, kindly start cm9 compiling process.....:silly:
btw, when i try to clone in windows they say source may be corrupted..any tip bro?:fingers-crossed:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you cloning it in windows bro?? We can't cross-compile Android in Windows environment....
Get a Linux distro and clone it there........
Anyway if you had completed cloning in windows, just copy the whole directory to your Linux......
can we expect cm 9 ???:silly:
Dj_cool said:
can we expect cm 9 ???:silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it doesn't support dual sim
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda premium
DanceOff said:
No it doesn't support dual sim
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sure most of us are willing to sacrifice dual sim support if we are on cm or ubuntu!
Sent from my Micromax A110
Dj_cool said:
can we expect cm 9 ???:silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See here....very interesting
http://www.jetdroid.org/shanzhai/2012/11/21/mt6577-kernel-source-released/
https://github.com/wiko-sources/cink-king
Hmm...the source releases seem to be growing now
pradipsoman said:
See here....very interesting
http://www.jetdroid.org/shanzhai/2012/11/21/mt6577-kernel-source-released/
https://github.com/wiko-sources/cink-king
Hmm...the source releases seem to be growing now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is ics kernel sources ryt .?
mmxa110user said:
this is ics kernel sources ryt .?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes... right
DanceOff said:
No it doesn't support dual sim
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutly false.
Do you know what means override ?
How stupid am i ?
The device tree has been provided by wiko, i've cloned the source but i've didn't take a look to it..
https://github.com/aquila-dev/wiko_s9081_stock_kernel/tree/master/mediatek/config
aquila-dev said:
How stupid am i ?
The device tree has been provided by wiko, i've cloned the source but i've didn't take a look to it..
https://github.com/aquila-dev/wiko_s9081_stock_kernel/tree/master/mediatek/config
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That means when they will release jb update they will provide jb aosp tree
Awesome
Btw any update abt jb release?
They just are waiting for google agreement..
@aquila-dev
we are also patiently waiting for the release of these kernel sources.
in order to fix some of the bugs with the cynus t2 rom on our phones, the a919.
specifically the accelerometer, gyroscope and the proximity sensors.
aquila, does the cynus t2 jb rom fully work on the cink king? without any sensor issues?
MIUI JB 4.1.2 for Pantech Burst 4G
WARNING
FLASH AT YOUR OWN RISK . THIS IS STILL ALPHA. SO IT GOES UNSAID, I'M NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR BRICKED / BROKEN PHONES OR ANY NUCLEAR WAR THAT YOU TRIGGER
DEVS CURRENTLY ON WORK
ujjwalchhabra
deathscream
DOWNLOADS
MIUI-presto-20130420-UNOFFICIAL
MD5SUM : 1b84a6e17e0848c05fd46a6ad0f74a96
Features
What works?
Camera
Calls
wifi
data
....you tell
What's borked?
Bluetooth call audio
System UI closes unexpectedly. (Known Bug : Can't see Status Bar ) Work in progress
That being said....HOW TO FLASH?
The flashing method is the same as always.
Only for devs for now those who want to experience MIUI on their devices.
SCREENSHOTS
Gimme some time...I don't wanna put ugly screenshots.....Coming Soon.
Go ahead happy flashing.
Reserved.:laugh:
hi, nice to see additional roms for the Pantech Burst! Is this better than CM and if so, in what way(s)?
Edit: sorry I did not notice the "dev" only label.
alan-31 said:
hi, nice to see additional roms for the Pantech Burst! Is this better than CM and if so, in what way(s)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MIUI is based on CM10. And its not upto me to tell if its better than any ROM. It depends on which ROM has features that suite the end user. For now this ROM is still in alpha build. A lot of things are still broken.
Lol , I was working on porting MIUI from Evo 3D . Its good you did source build . BTW can you brief me a little ? Its the same as building CM or some other steps ? Kindly provide a brief tutorial how you compiled as other devs did . That way everyone can compile and do debugging .
Thanks and regards
-UC
EDIT : It doesn't seems its a source build . Its a port , you should mention it in first page.
Many things don't work -
System ui
No miui launcher
backlight
torch app
...
BTW for all others who are willing to support and ready to work , read this thread and start porting . We all can work together on latest version of MIUI to port .
ujjwalchhabra said:
Lol , I was working on porting MIUI from Evo 3D . Its good you did source build . BTW can you brief me a little ? Its the same as building CM or some other steps ? Kindly provide a brief tutorial how you compiled as other devs did . That way everyone can compile and do debugging .
Thanks and regards
-UC
EDIT : It doesn't seems its a source build . Its a port , you should mention it in first page.
Many things don't work -
System ui
No miui launcher
backlight
torch app
...
BTW for all others who are willing to support and ready to work , read this thread and start porting . We all can work together on latest version of MIUI to port .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad ...I forgot to mention its a port...I'm currently working on modding the system ui to fix the force close issue. Any ideas on fixes?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
deathscream said:
My bad ...I forgot to mention its a port...I'm currently working on modding the system ui to fix the force close issue. Any ideas on fixes?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There must be something wrong with either these files
-Framework-res.apk ( wrong public.xml values causing problems to any of the functions in systemui .)
-services.jar ( maybe some imp base string might be missing )
--systemui.apk itself ( but less chance , or maybe resolution problem too .)
-Any other files , you ported you must be knowing . Gimme some more info I'll work a little on it too ,
- your MIUI's Base rom link ? Which device ?
- What you did while porting ? Replaced app,framework,fonts,media with MIUI ( after checking everything you found necessary ) and tweaked updater script ?
MY suggestion : I think its better if we work on another greater version of MIUI to port . Its a very appreciable effort of yours to atleast give kind attention to MIUI also . I think making things work on this port won't be that hard but if same amount of work given on latest version that will be more good . :good:
ujjwalchhabra said:
There must be something wrong with either these files
-Framework-res.apk ( wrong public.xml values causing problems to any of the functions in systemui .)
-services.jar ( maybe some imp base string might be missing )
--systemui.apk itself ( but less chance , or maybe resolution problem too .)
-Any other files , you ported you must be knowing . Gimme some more info I'll work a little on it too ,
- your MIUI's Base rom link ? Which device ?
- What you did while porting ? Replaced app,framework,fonts,media with MIUI ( after checking everything you found necessary ) and tweaked updater script ?
MY suggestion : I think its better if we work on another greater version of MIUI to port . Its a very appreciable effort of yours to atleast give kind attention to MIUI also . I think making things work on this port won't be that hard but if same amount of work given on latest version that will be more good . :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll recheck those. I used nexus s 4g port ROM. It was just a trial that I made. Started this thread to bring all the devs to work together since we have very few for our device. What miui did you think of porting?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
deathscream said:
I'll recheck those. I used nexus s 4g port ROM. It was just a trial that I made. Started this thread to bring all the devs to work together since we have very few for our device. What miui did you think of porting?
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First will try with MIUI version 3.4.12 - 3.3.x . Those are also based on 4.1.2 and are latest . I'll link you to some good device's source build .
EDIT : [ROM] MIUI v5 3.4.12 - OR - Unofficial MIUI V5(See nexus S link) What you say ? . I personally Prefer both . Sensation's build because its chipset will be similar to ours (quallcomm) and Nexus S for same resolution , though resolution isn't a big deal i think :/ through MIR we can resize framework-res.apk and rest the needful apps will be resized . But since you successfully made nexus S build boot , I think we should go with that ? What you say ?
ujjwalchhabra said:
First will try with MIUI version 3.4.12 - 3.3.x . Those are also based on 4.1.2 and are latest . I'll link you to some good device's source build .
EDIT : [ROM] MIUI v5 3.4.12 - OR - Unofficial MIUI V5(See nexus S link) What you say ? . I personally Prefer both . Sensation's build because its chipset will be similar to ours (quallcomm) and Nexus S for same resolution , though resolution isn't a big deal i think :/ through MIR we can resize framework-res.apk and rest the needful apps will be resized . But since you successfully made nexus S build boot , I think we should go with that ? What you say ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope you guys get this together, a shame im not very into development, but anything I can help just say it
ujjwalchhabra said:
First will try with MIUI version 3.4.12 - 3.3.x . Those are also based on 4.1.2 and are latest . I'll link you to some good device's source build .
EDIT : [ROM] MIUI v5 3.4.12 - OR - Unofficial MIUI V5(See nexus S link) What you say ? . I personally Prefer both . Sensation's build because its chipset will be similar to ours (quallcomm) and Nexus S for same resolution , though resolution isn't a big deal i think :/ through MIR we can resize framework-res.apk and rest the needful apps will be resized . But since you successfully made nexus S build boot , I think we should go with that ? What you say ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel sensation is a better choice ...resolution shouldn't be a problem. Will try it tonight and post the results. Lets try out what's best for our devices.
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
deathscream said:
I feel sensation is a better choice ...resolution shouldn't be a problem. Will try it tonight and post the results. Lets try out what's best for our devices.
Sent from my PantechP9070 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okay , I'll download sensation one . I think still we need to resize framework-res.apk first to even make it boot. Still Lets see . :good:
ujjwalchhabra said:
okay , I'll download sensation one . I think still we need to resize framework-res.apk first to even make it boot. Still Lets see . :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. The framework-res definitely needs to be re-sized. Let's see how the port comes out.
Hi respected devs and users,
I hope there is a serious issue going around this forum,you guyz know that MMX is now selling canvas2 with jb out of the box.
You guyz @Dark4Droid @BOND1987 @sagarwep @andiroxu @bsuhas @mufti.arfan @bindassdost @khan_frd2002 @pratikmore @mmxandy @superdragonpt @varun.chitre15 and many more did a fantastic job by bringing the 4.2 to our device which was an almost impossible.
The issue is now the new canvas2 with 4.2 installed is not having a working rear cam.
As this is a forum for our beloved device we don't have a seperate section for the latest canvas2 variant,actually many users are suffering because of this and also many users will buy canvas2 in future.
I know that MMX don't care about even announcing the changes they made to the device as they always do,so as you devs are the only responsible for the miracle happened and happening to our device in this forum,so please kindly address this issue so that this forum may have many upcoming canvas2 supporters who buys the phone in future.
My kind request to users who have the canvas2 with rear cam not working to post a log cat while opening your camera in 4.2,so that it will be easy to find the actual issue.
You users can make this thread active by responding with proper log cats.its in your hands.
Thank you,
Showstopper1
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
poran123 said:
my canvas 2 came with jb and rear camera not working... but i dont know how to get logcat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google it.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Please find the solutin we need must waiting for resolution.... of cam
mufti.arfan said:
This is a kernel issue, or maybe .. if we get the new system modules from these "new" models, it may help in solving it , since I beleive that front cam is already working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
nightwalker said:
Yes,Sir Only front cam is working on new canvas 2 with fixed 4.2 roms on new canvas 2
Let's see what will happen in future!!
Where can we get system modules,by unpacking kernel??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
mufti.arfan said:
No they are in /system/lib folder.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
nightwalker said:
ok,so we need to use stock jelly bean rom or the device should have it preloaded with jb out of the box??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The pre loaded one, and it's kernel compilation time, if that will be different than our it means kernel is new. If it's same then we can try libs from it, if that doesn't work either then its a hardware thingy.
Sent from my Micromax A110 using xda app-developers app
superdragonpt said:
Most probably it's an Kernel issue.
And the best guy for the Job is @varun.chitre15, he haves an deep know how, of your kernel/phone, and he is the Best guy in your community for fixing kernel issues.
However, if i was him, i would leave your community, as you have NO respect for him and his work.
Another guy, just tooked his patches from his ThunderZap kernel, and claim as it was ALL his work.
Even after his Kernel thread got closed, and all the Moderation warnings/edits you (the MMX community) are still distributing "his" Kernel on this foruns, and in your FB Group (yes i know, im part of your FB Group too...).
Where's the respect ?
B.Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
(...). Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.(...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think that my no source is making you fool then it's to you.
Everybody is fair handsome here and know everything.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
New mmx have slight hardware change i guess or the kernel issue some one needs to share their device(or system libs) here so that devs can make a change
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!! As a member of A110 community you should be aware of this !!!
superdragonpt said:
^^ Yeah buddy.
Keep it going, fooling everybody
/ offtopic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
@superdragonpt & @andiroxu Stop it friends....Dont fight... Just understand we are fighting for Cheap[i didnt mean price] device.... Human relations is far better than Device Relations... I know i got plenty of friends because of MMX C2.... But Why fight for it? I agree both Varun and andiroxu have their own capablities,better leave them alone...
And @superdragonpt : Any Add-ons for 4.2 ? :laugh: More ROM's are on NR... I am using Xperia Messaging app on 4.2 :angel:
andiroxu said:
Yes you are right. I need specs and made for camera in new models because without that no one can help or need sources which are not released by MMX yet.
Anyone kindly give the manufacturer name of camera. It can be known by using Andromizer app on xda or any app from play store which gives full hardware information.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro i have install the app but i didnt find any information about camera.... m using miui rom 4.1.2 and i dont have the backup of the original JB rom which came along with my phone
andiroxu said:
Dear @superdragonpt
Who are you to say such a things? Are you moderator or administrator of the thread/forum? Who gave you such a right to make decision who is wrong and who is right? If you and others have such a soft corner of the people here then why not solving their problem promptly and answer me or anyone by your work. You say I theft the patches from thunderzap then tell me if he has produced all the codes/patches by his own. Buddy I think you have no knowledge of kernel development and you are giving such a stupid comments here. All the patches are there on GitHub and kernel.org. Now not uploading kernel sources is my problem. Why I am not uploading is to me and not your pain to take.
Moreover people like you are not obeying forum rules and you are openly discussing the out the thread discussions openly rather then sending a PM. It's you who started and that's why I am writing here otherwise I too like to PM the things first. So stop this nonsense wise-man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Edit: I really don't understand in what sense comment of @superdragonpt sounds like a moderator?
mayur.3.92 said:
Some people feel themselves as moderators here buddy!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buddy, let me tell you this:
Im not an MOD, but i can't stand people that STEALS, other's work, And what's worse is that he is CLAIMING it is his work.
You don't understand what we are talking about, and that's normal, the "normal" xda user don't understand this things, but believe me i know.
The normal xda user, just want RESULTS, and don't care about GPL and credits, and dont even imagine HOW MUCH WORK was involved.
The normal xda user, just come here, download and thats it!
@andiroxu Yes you have stolen varun's work. and you should be an shame of yourself.
Come on prove that im wrong, and upload your kernel sources...
But PLEASE don't repeat tha same trick you've done in your kernel thread when you uploaded FAKE sources.
I didnt wanted to come in public with this statments, i dont even own an micromax phone (my phone is an ZTE), but if there is something that gets on my nerves is this things.
I have an DEEPLY RESPECT with all the work that @varun.chitre15 have done, just like every other dev.
These devs are the reason we have custom roms and kernels, as an alternative to our stock ones.
varun.chitre15 said:
Derp, so you mean to say that the patches I merged have got no contribution of mine?
Certainly they were taken from mainline but from what you posted I can surely tell that the 3.4.69 upgrade you claim to is nothing other than a gimmick which just involves only bumping the makefile version staging just as doing the very famous fake build.prop Android version trick. I hope you don't come out with a Linux Kernel 4.0 from your closed shell someday. If you have really upgraded it to mainstream, then prove it. You made this comment because you never really upgraded your kernel because if you did, you would have known what conflict resolution is and how much efforts it involves. Wait I will step down one level for you. So you have got problem for uploading your sources no? Come on then show me output of
Code:
git rev-list HEAD --count
using screen capture. I have no business with whether you upgraded your kernel or not but I am really interested to see that screenshot.
2. Now regarding stealing my work, yes you did that. Because usage of someone's work which plays an important role, without their permission is defined as stealing. And you know very well that the Mediatek vermagic hack which force loads all modules, the authorization of which I keep with me, is what you have merged without prior intimation to me or any acknowledgement. Now don't make me to reveal everything in public.
And why not discuss this in public? So people won't know about your deeds?
I really need to see your sources now because I have understood what kind of game you are playing, I am not sure what all stuff you took from ThunderZap because even undervolting commit belongs to me.
P.S: Users should really stay away from this because this matter is not as simple as it appears. There is a lot you all don't know about this which happened under the hood.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^ THIS.
Hey everyone,
As you've seen the craze among android users who are eager to have newly released BBM on their android phone and I'm also an android user (wannabe developer and going to become after some months) using Xperia U but since I don't have it due to my exams so for the time being I'm using bluestacks on my PC. So is there any way to install BBM on it??
nirajkaushik said:
Hey everyone,
As you've seen the craze among android users who are eager to have newly released BBM on their android phone and I'm also an android user (wannabe developer and going to become after some months) using Xperia U but since I don't have it due to my exams so for the time being I'm using bluestacks on my PC. So is there any way to install BBM on it??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bbm needs android 4.0 or higer..
but bluestacks currently running android 2.0
so we hav to wait for new version of bluestacks..
chozycorleon said:
bbm needs android 4.0 or higer..
but bluestacks currently running android 2.0
so we hav to wait for new version of bluestacks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can make Bluestack download BBM from playstore, but it couldnt pass the setting up BBM screen
chozycorleon said:
bbm needs android 4.0 or higer..
but bluestacks currently running android 2.0
so we hav to wait for new version of bluestacks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BBM has been ported to 2.3 Gingerbread(http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2496483) you don't need ICS+ anymore..
But the easier way is using Google play but on google play you will need ICS+
Fantassy123 said:
BBM has been ported to 2.3 Gingerbread(http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2496483) you don't need ICS+ anymore..
But the easier way is using Google play but on google play you will need ICS+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But this won't be supported by Bluestacks I guess, since it has 2.0 OS and this one is for 2.3,