Hi *
I've just run trough all the setps to be able to build aosp on ubuntu. Currently I'm running a build, looks like it will take a while.
My goal is to build an aosp rom for the samsung galaxy chat, samsung provides downloads for 'platform' and kernel.
My question is, what should I do with the sources of the kernel and the platform, do I need to integrate them into the aosp source?
cheers
DrBytes said:
Hi *
I've just run trough all the setps to be able to build aosp on ubuntu. Currently I'm running a build, looks like it will take a while.
My goal is to build an aosp rom for the samsung galaxy chat, samsung provides downloads for 'platform' and kernel.
My question is, what should I do with the sources of the kernel and the platform, do I need to integrate them into the aosp source?
cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be easier for you to use the cyanogenmod source instead. I found this easier for me than trying to use aosp source.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
I have the repo setup for CM10 as well, I even added the skeleton files for the b5330 using the mkvendor script and the boot.img I pulled off the device. Still though, what am I to do with the platform and kernel files provided by samsung?
where to find kernel source code?
Can you please give me the link to kernel source code??
Related
Is there a way for me to download the latest nexus s rom, from the same source google uses to build it, and build a completely stock nexus s rom? If so where are these repositories and how do you build it?
Yes there certainly is. The source code repo is on github but I don't have the link with me. A thread already floating around here on compiling the kernel from source, search it out.
psyclobe said:
Is there a way for me to download the latest nexus s rom, from the same source google uses to build it, and build a completely stock nexus s rom? If so where are these repositories and how do you build it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This site might help you
http://forum.androidcentral.com/sam.../48675-how-compile-nexus-s-kernel-source.html
Perfect thanks.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Who's using cornerstone and what ROM are you using and is it stable for day to day use?
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Im wondering the same thing.. but I can only see 2 available.
CM9 and Team EOS
I tried CM9 and wifi didnt work so I couldn't really test much
Do you know any other?
Edit: Just read that Team EOS is AOSP Rom... I don't like to flash those..
Hi alls, I'm a newbie what is cornestone?
thank you
ezechiele25172012 said:
Hi alls, I'm a newbie what is cornestone?
thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOqBAfMwCAc
LOL at you not liking AOSP ROMs LMAO what do you think that CM9 is?
AOSP = Android Open Source Project. It is when Google releases the source code to a particular version of android (GB, HC, ICS) and this source is adapted to your device by usually taking existing kernels (or kernel source code) and drivers for your device and making the Google source code run, pretty much without many additions..although, if you like spice, you will find it in an AOSP ROM. Asus' Stock ROM is also based on Googles source, but then Asus is not obligated to release it's proprietary source (what it adds to the OS that Google AOSP ROM did not have, bloatware, drivers, etc). Therefore what we are able to do in a ROM based on Asus' is limited compared to what can be done in an AOSP ROM. Some are stable, some aren't..it isn't a function of it being an 'AOSP' ROM lol it's just how developed or underdeveloped the ROM is. CM9 for TF101 is way more unstable than CM9 for my Epic, they are both AOSP and from the same source even, and they run differently- because they are at different stages of development and being developed by different teams of people.
Don't be so quick to scoff at AOSP ROMs..they are not all the same, and nothing in the term 'AOSP' means 'unstable' or otherwise anything to be afraid of.
luna_c666 said:
LOL at you not liking AOSP ROMs LMAO what do you think that CM9 is?
AOSP = Android Open Source Project. It is when Google releases the source code to a particular version of android (GB, HC, ICS) and this source is adapted to your device by usually taking existing kernels (or kernel source code) and drivers for your device and making the Google source code run, pretty much without many additions..although, if you like spice, you will find it in an AOSP ROM. Asus' Stock ROM is also based on Googles source, but then Asus is not obligated to release it's proprietary source (what it adds to the OS that Google AOSP ROM did not have, bloatware, drivers, etc). Therefore what we are able to do in a ROM based on Asus' is limited compared to what can be done in an AOSP ROM. Some are stable, some aren't..it isn't a function of it being an 'AOSP' ROM lol it's just how developed or underdeveloped the ROM is. CM9 for TF101 is way more unstable than CM9 for my Epic, they are both AOSP and from the same source even, and they run differently- because they are at different stages of development and being developed by different teams of people.
Don't be so quick to scoff at AOSP ROMs..they are not all the same, and nothing in the term 'AOSP' means 'unstable' or otherwise anything to be afraid of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thank you very much for your perfect explanation. But why do you say that CM9 for TF101 is unstable? In the relative thread i read that the users are very satisfied by this rom.
Dont lol at me! hehehe
I know CM9 is AOSP.. that was the first and only AOSP Rom I ever tried..
I'm not scoffing AOSP Roms off I just didn't see the advantage but I didn't know that Asus doesn't release it's proprietary source.
Don't be so quick to lol at people apart from that it was a good reply... I might give them a go again in the future
Malandro2011 said:
Dont lol at me! hehehe
I know CM9 is AOSP.. that was the first and only AOSP Rom I ever tried..
I'm not scoffing AOSP Roms off I just didn't see the advantage but I didn't know that Asus doesn't release it's proprietary source.
Don't be so quick to lol at people apart from that it was a good reply... I might give them a go again in the future
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Malandro, what is your experience with CM9 ROM? Are you satisfied, is it fast?
thanks
ezechiele25172012 said:
Hi Malandro, what is your experience with CM9 ROM? Are you satisfied, is it fast?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that cm9 with cornerstone and it is buggy...
The non cornerstone cm9 would be better but I didn't try it...
Malandro2011 said:
I tried that cm9 with cornerstone and it is buggy...
The non cornerstone cm9 would be better but I didn't try it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok but I had read it's come with ICS 4.0.4; what are the differences you noticed between 4.0.4 and 4.0.3 ICS version?
thank you
I was wondering if we already have a repo for kernels for the GT-P51XX series tablets. I have been using an E4GT for a while now and with the level of customizations available to us, the community has benefitted greatly by having a central location to get all kernels, modems (for phones), stock/leaked roms, and its super convenient when you are looking for kernels that you might be needing at any time..
If there is such a repo already, please advise where, and if there isn't yet, how much of a demand is there for one? I can easily set one up for us, but I would need someone to let me know where to get them so I could "centralize" them
sj
Sent from my pimped out E4GT on CM10 - 1/13 Nightly with [email protected] Pro 2.4.8
using SwiftKey Flow
DownLoad the beta version for Tablets v4.0.0.61
By "repo" do you mean a place where we can download the source or repo, a tool used to download & sync the Android source code and its associated git repository?
Posted from my Fascinate using XDA Premium
MultipleMonomials said:
By "repo" do you mean a place where we can download the source or repo, a tool used to download & sync the Android source code and its associated git repository?
Posted from my Fascinate using XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about something like a kernel repository so its a centralized location..
Like this: rwilco's kernel repo XDA thread
rwilco's AFH site
sj
Sent from my GT-P5113 on CM10.1 - 1/13 Nightly using [email protected] Pro 2.4.8
No, we don't really have anything like that. I can't really say how much demand there is for one, though.
Posted from my Galaxy Tab with CM10
MultipleMonomials said:
No, we don't really have anything like that. I can't really say how much demand there is for one, though.
Posted from my Galaxy Tab with CM10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, i think you're right, I haven't found many kernels for the GT-P5113.. but if there are at least say 5-7 kernels, I would be able to centralize them so they all could be found in one spot, and keep latest updates handy
sj
Sent from my pimped out E4GT on CM10 - 1/14 Nightly with [email protected] Pro 2.4.8
using SwiftKey Flow
DownLoad the beta version for Tablets v4.0.0.61
There are 3 non-stock kernels for the 10.1:
CM10OC Kernel
BlameSamsung Kernel
Cmenard's AOKP OC kernel.
Posted from my Galaxy Tab with CM10
HI whats the diffrence between cyanogen mod android 4.4.2 and the android 4.4.2 rom? i am new btw to the root side.
Is it the same of diffrent?
Android 4.4.2 is the version released from AOSP, a Google supported open source group. Other organizations start with the source code from AOSP and deliver their own way. Cyanogenmod is just one of those organizations. Search XDA and learn about the differences.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
OracleBiker said:
Android 4.4.2 is the version released from AOSP, a Google supported open source group. Other organizations start with the source code from AOSP and deliver their own way. Cyanogenmod is just one of those organizations. Search XDA and learn about the differences.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And usually CyanogenMod has more stability, tweaks and best performance. It's also more customizable and I think it's better than stock ROM.
EDIT: And it's also pre-rooted.
Sent from my Xperia U using xda app-developers app
OracleBiker said:
Android 4.4.2 is the version released from AOSP, a Google supported open source group. Other organizations start with the source code from AOSP and deliver their own way. Cyanogenmod is just one of those organizations. Search XDA and learn about the differences.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats the speed difference between them are they same or different?
AT02BOY said:
Whats the speed difference between them are they same or different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cyanogenmod is also android, there are lots of things that you have to learn
First Android is a open source and is owned by Google and the sources are released in source.android.com
It is called AOSP and all oems use this AOSP source to build roms and provide for their devices and they also add their own interface for example : Samsung - touch wiz, Sony - xperia ui, HTC - senseui
Cyanogenmod is a company (recently incorporated) which heavily mods the AOSP source and release it as cm source. difference between AOSP and cm is more stable than AOSP and is more customisable Google a bit to know about features of cm
There are official cm which are built by cm itself also unofficial cm which are built by developers from the open source of cm
When you ask about speed cm is more stable and has no lags, so it is good than AOSP
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk
CM11 (android 4.4.2) is custom-made rom unauthorized individuals or organizations, but still a nice feature and easily modified than the stock rom. however there may be some bugs. (I use the CM11 Android 4.4.2). stock rom is the official rom. more features but not easy to modify.
----------------------------------------------------
Current device : Xperia ION
ROM : CM11 android 4.4.2
PRESS 'THANKS' BUTTON IF I HELPED YOU
Sent from my Xperia ion using xda app-developers app
Hi XDA Community,
Why developers could not use the source code from a TouchWiz Kernel for an AOSP ROM. Touchwiz is based on aosp or I'm wrong?
Touchwiz is built on AOSP correct but Samsung have made loads of changes (annoyingly but makes touchwiz better) and Samsung do give us developers source with thier OSRC website but the source they give is not enough to get a fully functional build of say CM or any other of your favourite Roms
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
King_lilrowrow said:
Touchwiz is built on AOSP correct but Samsung have made loads of changes (annoyingly but makes touchwiz better) and Samsung do give us developers source with thier OSRC website but the source they give is not enough to get a fully functional build of say CM or any other of your favourite Roms
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the Information :good:
May I ask what kind of libs or drivers are not in the publicly available source code? Because I thought that it would be possible to 'just' pull the libs and stuff from current Kernel or within /system/lib/
Now I am not a pro if talking about reverse engineering or whatever, but isn't it possible to extract necessary source from device or maybe fully decompile the Stock Rom? If all I said is the biggest bullcrap ever please tell me.