Who's using cornerstone and what ROM are you using and is it stable for day to day use?
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Im wondering the same thing.. but I can only see 2 available.
CM9 and Team EOS
I tried CM9 and wifi didnt work so I couldn't really test much
Do you know any other?
Edit: Just read that Team EOS is AOSP Rom... I don't like to flash those..
Hi alls, I'm a newbie what is cornestone?
thank you
ezechiele25172012 said:
Hi alls, I'm a newbie what is cornestone?
thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOqBAfMwCAc
LOL at you not liking AOSP ROMs LMAO what do you think that CM9 is?
AOSP = Android Open Source Project. It is when Google releases the source code to a particular version of android (GB, HC, ICS) and this source is adapted to your device by usually taking existing kernels (or kernel source code) and drivers for your device and making the Google source code run, pretty much without many additions..although, if you like spice, you will find it in an AOSP ROM. Asus' Stock ROM is also based on Googles source, but then Asus is not obligated to release it's proprietary source (what it adds to the OS that Google AOSP ROM did not have, bloatware, drivers, etc). Therefore what we are able to do in a ROM based on Asus' is limited compared to what can be done in an AOSP ROM. Some are stable, some aren't..it isn't a function of it being an 'AOSP' ROM lol it's just how developed or underdeveloped the ROM is. CM9 for TF101 is way more unstable than CM9 for my Epic, they are both AOSP and from the same source even, and they run differently- because they are at different stages of development and being developed by different teams of people.
Don't be so quick to scoff at AOSP ROMs..they are not all the same, and nothing in the term 'AOSP' means 'unstable' or otherwise anything to be afraid of.
luna_c666 said:
LOL at you not liking AOSP ROMs LMAO what do you think that CM9 is?
AOSP = Android Open Source Project. It is when Google releases the source code to a particular version of android (GB, HC, ICS) and this source is adapted to your device by usually taking existing kernels (or kernel source code) and drivers for your device and making the Google source code run, pretty much without many additions..although, if you like spice, you will find it in an AOSP ROM. Asus' Stock ROM is also based on Googles source, but then Asus is not obligated to release it's proprietary source (what it adds to the OS that Google AOSP ROM did not have, bloatware, drivers, etc). Therefore what we are able to do in a ROM based on Asus' is limited compared to what can be done in an AOSP ROM. Some are stable, some aren't..it isn't a function of it being an 'AOSP' ROM lol it's just how developed or underdeveloped the ROM is. CM9 for TF101 is way more unstable than CM9 for my Epic, they are both AOSP and from the same source even, and they run differently- because they are at different stages of development and being developed by different teams of people.
Don't be so quick to scoff at AOSP ROMs..they are not all the same, and nothing in the term 'AOSP' means 'unstable' or otherwise anything to be afraid of.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thank you very much for your perfect explanation. But why do you say that CM9 for TF101 is unstable? In the relative thread i read that the users are very satisfied by this rom.
Dont lol at me! hehehe
I know CM9 is AOSP.. that was the first and only AOSP Rom I ever tried..
I'm not scoffing AOSP Roms off I just didn't see the advantage but I didn't know that Asus doesn't release it's proprietary source.
Don't be so quick to lol at people apart from that it was a good reply... I might give them a go again in the future
Malandro2011 said:
Dont lol at me! hehehe
I know CM9 is AOSP.. that was the first and only AOSP Rom I ever tried..
I'm not scoffing AOSP Roms off I just didn't see the advantage but I didn't know that Asus doesn't release it's proprietary source.
Don't be so quick to lol at people apart from that it was a good reply... I might give them a go again in the future
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Malandro, what is your experience with CM9 ROM? Are you satisfied, is it fast?
thanks
ezechiele25172012 said:
Hi Malandro, what is your experience with CM9 ROM? Are you satisfied, is it fast?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that cm9 with cornerstone and it is buggy...
The non cornerstone cm9 would be better but I didn't try it...
Malandro2011 said:
I tried that cm9 with cornerstone and it is buggy...
The non cornerstone cm9 would be better but I didn't try it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok but I had read it's come with ICS 4.0.4; what are the differences you noticed between 4.0.4 and 4.0.3 ICS version?
thank you
Related
I have a Moto Droid 1 and I am currently running CM7 Nightlies. I'm trying to find a way to get HTC Sense to run on the Droid. I was wondering what would happen if I took the CM7 that is designed for the HTC Incredible and installed it on my Droid.
Any thoughts?
Nobody's tried this?
Sent from my Droid using XDA App
The CM7 for Incredible does not have Sense. None of the CMs have Sense. It's an AOSP ROM.
The update won't work, and might brick your phone. The Incredible has different drivers and a different kernel than your phone. You need a ROM designed for your phone.
Try searching the Droid subforums for a port of Sense. That's the only way you're going to get Sense on your phone.
Thanks for the heads up! So if want to continue to use cyanogen, then sense is an impossibility? Or any custom rom for that matter?
Sent from my Droid using XDA App
airballwall said:
Thanks for the heads up! So if want to continue to use cyanogen, then sense is an impossibility? Or any custom rom for that matter?
Sent from my Droid using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cyanogen = NO Sense, never will have sense
cyanogen also known as AOSP
When searching for a rom if it has AOSP in title chances are it is based off of cyanogen.
cordell12 said:
When searching for a rom if it has AOSP in title chances are it is based off of cyanogen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh, nope. AOSP = Android Open Source Pfoject. If it says AOSP, it is based off the original Android source code (but may incorporate code from other AOSP ROMs).
Sense is not AOSP. HTC took the AOSP source and heavily modified it to make their Sense UI. ROMs based on this can't be considered AOSP.
router54g said:
Uh, nope. AOSP = Android Open Source Pfoject. If it says AOSP, it is based off the original Android source code (but may incorporate code from other AOSP ROMs).
Sense is not AOSP. HTC took the AOSP source and heavily modified it to make their Sense UI. ROMs based on this can't be considered AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guarantee just about every aosp rom out there has some files from CM.
Maybe not a Google device, but others have some libs or drivers of some sort. Go look at the github's of roms. You will see "forked" from cyanogen tree, if not mad props to the chef!
By the way I didnt say sense is aosp
"Uh, nope. AOSP = Android Open Source Pfoject. If it says AOSP, it is based off the original Android source code"
Where do you think cyanogen comes from, the moon?
You would have to take a sense kernel and modify it to run on a motor Droid. It might be possible but it'd be a large undertaking
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
yeah guys source code for ICS was released today. to bad we dont have a lot of developers and thanks to the ones who stayed with us.
And you cant post this in one of the many threads open for this exact same reason?????
fcisco13 said:
And you cant post this in one of the many threads open for this exact same reason?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Apparently He/She is a special snowflake
Thanks for the info but we will add this thread to the previous 30 threads about ICS.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
I wish I was a special snow flake...
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using XDA App
This is so tiring. Another thread about worthless source code. Source code without drivers compiled for our device against ICS is worthless. Devs cannot build an ICS build that will be stable without specific drivers built for iCS and the new kernel. Until LG releases or at least leaks an ICS build for our phone, we are not going to get a stable ICS rom, despite their being AOSP source code.
jboxer said:
This is so tiring. Another thread about worthless source code. Source code without drivers compiled for our device against ICS is worthless. Devs cannot build an ICS build that will be stable without specific drivers built for iCS and the new kernel. Until LG releases or at least leaks an ICS build for our phone, we are not going to get a stable ICS rom, despite their being AOSP source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never said anything about the devs to start making rom didnt i???? now that source code is release brands like lg will start working on then since they said they would. i know htc said that ics will come to my sensation earlier 2012
and even though developers make an ics rom without the manufacture release its versio it would not work correctly because of the drivers. it will have problems with gps etc etc
jboxer said:
This is so tiring. Another thread about worthless source code. Source code without drivers compiled for our device against ICS is worthless. Devs cannot build an ICS build that will be stable without specific drivers built for iCS and the new kernel. Until LG releases or at least leaks an ICS build for our phone, we are not going to get a stable ICS rom, despite their being AOSP source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Release of ICS source code is still an important development for community rom development.
We can still get a stable build by compiling ICS against Gingerbread kernel.
We have fully working drivers for Gingerbread kernel.
Yes but the cookie in Ice Cream Sandwich is not Gingerbread.
raddy said:
Release of ICS source code is still an important development for community rom development.
We can still get a stable build by compiling ICS against Gingerbread kernel.
We have fully working drivers for Gingerbread kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really hope you're right. My only concern before getting this phone was that of NVIDIA providing the devs with the drivers that we need for further Android updates.
Since HTC has just dropped the 3.0 kernel source for the Sensation, is anyone working on a pure AOSP ROM? Not a de-Sensed ROM based off the One S leak, or a CM9 build with drivers hacked in from somewhere, but a real built-from-source ROM.
I'm thinking of taking a crack at building one, but I didn't want to duplicate someone else's efforts.
Take a look at this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1494373
CM9
LegendaryLengend said:
Take a look at this thread: CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, yeah, I forgot about OpenSensation. I might clone the repo and play with the new kernel anyway, just for kicks. I haven't really tried to build Android from scratch before, but I'm a pretty good C/C++/C# programmer, so it might be fun to try.
njb42 said:
Sorry, yeah, I forgot about OpenSensation. I might clone the repo and play with the new kernel anyway, just for kicks. I haven't really tried to build Android from scratch before, but I'm a pretty good C/C++/C# programmer, so it might be fun to try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem m8, i found another one the virtuous team work(ed) on a AOSP ROM too.
But i don´t know is it is still supported: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1428866
Just keep on going, its allways nice to have more developers woring on the Sensation!
I just managed to build OpenSensation with the HTC kernel source and boot it on my phone. Now it's time to play.
Well, it's a start!
njb42 said:
I just managed to build OpenSensation with the HTC kernel source and boot it on my phone. Now it's time to play.
Well, it's a start!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't wait
When u need beta tester let me know
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
AOKP
For the record I'd like to say that there is also AOKP, which builds on OpenSensation, which builds on CM9 repos, as far as I can gather.
I'm currently running b31 (b32 came out 2012-04-16) and most everything works. There are a couple of features missing from b31 that I used on CM7.1 Alpha, (like Quiet Hours), but they appear to have been added in b32.
If you're looking for something AOSP, my suggestion would be AOKP.
They pack Nova Launcher as an alternative to the stock launcher, but I uninstalled both and went with APEX, which IMHO beats both on customizability and unintrusive interface. YMMV however...
Hello everyone, I've got Galaxy S Plus 5 months ago, and I found out that there will be no official ICS or JB update for it, so I am asking is there AOSP version of ICS for this device, not CM or AOKP. If there is I would be thankful if someone could post it here, thanks
You're on the wrong section. But nvm I'll answer. Broodplank was trying to build aosp ics but no success. For now we have no aosp ics or jb. Broodplank announced the aosp ics on one of the comments in the cm7 2.1 thread
Juhan Jufri said:
You're on the wrong section. But nvm I'll answer. Broodplank was trying to build aosp ics but no success. For now we have no aosp ics or jb. Broodplank announced the aosp ics on one of the comments in the cm7 2.1 thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for info
Another thread? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1905308
Use general section, please
Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
We have CM9 and Partially working CM10.
i think thats enough for now. Or can you develop?
A working aosp gb is possible. But afaik a working aosp ics is only possible by porting. But unfortunately i havnt succeeded in that. Same thing for compiling from source.
I need stock, not CM. And AOSP kinda is a stock samsung system
TodorSRB said:
I need stock, not CM. And AOSP kinda is a stock samsung system
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a stock Samsung, it's stock Google/Android. FWIW, it'd be nice to see AOSP, but CM is in general more customizable and advanced.
Sent from my GT-I9001
Well if I intend to sell the phone I wanna sell it with ICS stock look and I want to have ICS because it is a lot faster, GB on my Xperia Mini was slow, after update to ICS it worked much faster, I hope same would be with SGSP, but I can't even update Galaxy to official 2.3.6. I don't know why...I didn't even found official Samsung forum
I just remembered that the first alpha build of jelly bean from vpumpkin was an aosp jb but its not stable and can't make calls. Doomsday released his latest build but was not an aosp. Well if you are pro at making roms then try to take vpumpkin's aosp jb and add in doomsday's fixes to cm10. I don't know but I think its hard to just take cm9 and remove the theme manager
What, in your opinion, is the best AOSP/AOKP ROM for the Verizon Galaxy SIII that is based on the latest SOURE CODE (4.2.1)?
Thanks in advance!
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
RBarnett09 said:
What, in your opinion, is the best AOSP/AOKP ROM for the Verizon Galaxy SIII that is based on the latest OTA?
Thanks in advance!
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you wont find one. AOSP and VZW software are independent of each other.
do some research for yourself. visit the original development section for AOSP options, and developement for TWouchwiz options.
check out Jellybeans, its got AOPS theming with TW functionality.
RBarnett09 said:
What, in your opinion, is the best AOSP/AOKP ROM for the Verizon Galaxy SIII that is based on the latest OTA?
Thanks in advance!
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AOSP developers are no longer developing 4.1.1 based ROMs they are making ROMs based on the 4.2.1 source code. If you want AOSP ROMs go to the original android development section. If you want ROMs based on the official ota then go to the android development section. Just so you know AOSP ROMs are never based on official ota updates but on source codes released prior to any ota by any carrier which is why they are the first to develop the latest version of Android. I can't give an opinion on the AOSP ROMs as they are all in beta and will have problems. In the meantime check out the ROMs in the android development section while the AOSP developers work out the kinks to their ROMs.
jmxc23 said:
The AOSP developers are no longer developing 4.1.1 based ROMs they are making ROMs based on the 4.2.1 source code. If you want AOSP ROMs go to the original android development section. If you want ROMs based on the official ota then go to the android development section. Just so you know AOSP ROMs are never based on official ota updates but on source codes released prior to any ota by any carrier which is why they are the first to develop the latest version of Android. I can't give an opinion on the AOSP ROMs as they are all in beta and will have problems. In the meantime check out the ROMs in the android development section while the AOSP developers work out the kinks to their ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. I'm looking for AOSP or AOKP based on the 4.2.1 source code. Not a fan at all of TW... I like having that Vanilla Android feel.
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
RBarnett09 said:
This is true. I'm looking for AOSP or AOKP based on the 4.2.1 source code. Not a fan at all of TW... I like having that Vanilla Android feel.
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check out Pure google in the original development section.
here you go
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2066467
If you like that vanilla feel then why are you asking for AOSP ROMs? With the exception of the Pure Google ROM, AOSP ROMs are not vanilla looking.
jmxc23 said:
If you like that vanilla feel then why are you asking for AOSP ROMs? With the exception of the Pure Google ROM, AOSP ROMs are not vanilla looking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
???
Every AOSP ROM has touhwiz removed... making it Vanilla basically. Or am I wrong?
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
RBarnett09 said:
???
Every AOSP ROM has touhwiz removed... making it Vanilla basically. Or am I wrong?
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rbarnett, I know what you mean by vanilla. I tried all the asop roms and I gotta say I liked liquid smooth the best. Rc9, built on 4.1 and still available, has a lot of nice features that the newer and less developed beta3 (4.2) does not. All the 4.2 ROMs have busted Bluetooth right now but besides for that they seem to run pretty good. If you don't mind some minor bugs, they are all pretty good to play around with.
H
afm1118 said:
Rbarnett, I know what you mean by vanilla. I tried all the asop roms and I gotta say I liked liquid smooth the best. Rc9, built on 4.1 and still available, has a lot of nice features that the newer and less developed beta3 (4.2) does not. All the 4.2 ROMs have busted Bluetooth right now but besides for that they seem to run pretty good. If you don't mind some minor bugs, they are all pretty good to play around with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Basically a ROM that looks as if Nova launcher or Apex launcher is running... but has samsungs touchwiz removed. Also all the menus are basic ICS and not touchwiz menus. I'm glad you get what I'm saying.
I'll check out Liquid smooth RC9 then since I need working Bluetooth.
Thanks for the recommendation.
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda premium