Petition to Samsung and Google - Galaxy S 4 General

Guys, i have created this... What u think about it?
I have not added Google and samsung's email cause i think that nominating them will be ok...
https://www.change.org/it/petizioni...amsung-s4-gt-i9505-like-the-s4-google-edition

how bout we wait for the S4 GE to be actually released first?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

If they're based on the same hardware (and everything I have read so far indicates they are) what does it matter? Even if the ROMs from the Google edition of the S4 don't work direct, they almost certainly will with a bit of tinkering and that will be done by people on here. The upshot is we don't need Samsung or Google to release firmware to change the I9505 into the Google edition of the phone.
Besides, neither company would do this anyway, and a petition won't change that.

coolpix90 said:
Guys, i have created this... What u think about it?
I have not added Google and samsung's email cause i think that nominating them will be ok...
https://www.change.org/it/petizioni...amsung-s4-gt-i9505-like-the-s4-google-edition
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You've clearly never experienced the determination of people on xda, who will go out of their way to create a ROM for users, especially on the Samsung Galaxy S2 (my last phone). CyanogenMod was continuously maintained and it was AOSP based, very similar to that of a stock Android ROM. The hardware seems very similar to the current GS4's anyway, I'm sure you will see a working stock ROM within days of the Google edition being released. Also, a petition won't make Google or Samsung release the ROM.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app

themadba said:
You've clearly never experienced the determination of people on xda, who will go out of their way to create a ROM for users, especially on the Samsung Galaxy S2 (my last phone). CyanogenMod was continuously maintained and it was AOSP based, very similar to that of a stock Android ROM. The hardware seems very similar to the current GS4's anyway, I'm sure you will see a working stock ROM within days of the Google edition being released. Also, a petition won't make Google or Samsung release the ROM.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it seems like you thing it is a bad thing... or not?

petition deleted, wait for the ufficial release of i9505G

If it wont be able to install it the official way, I will port this thing to I9505

coolpix90 said:
it seems like you thing it is a bad thing... or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. I'm simply highlighting the flaws. The petition won't make Google or Samsung release the ROM, it was the same with Samsung on the gs2, they wouldn't release the source code for the exynos 4 processor, even after multiple petitions. And also, when the GE is released, you will see a working ROM for the i9505 and i9500 quickly after that, plus CM10.1 is already on both devices.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app

themadba said:
Absolutely not. I'm simply highlighting the flaws. The petition won't make Google or Samsung release the ROM, it was the same with Samsung on the gs2, they wouldn't release the source code for the exynos 4 processor, even after multiple petitions. And also, when the GE is released, you will see a working ROM for the i9505 and i9500 quickly after that, plus CM10.1 is already on both devices.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The I9505 yes, as it's the same hardware from all reports. But I wouldn't bet on seeing a working rom off the Google S4 for the I9500 any time soon as the heart of that phone is based upon a completely different architecture. And CM10.1 isn't on the I9500 at all as of yet, nowhere near.

Pagnell said:
The I9505 yes, as it's the same hardware from all reports. But I wouldn't bet on seeing a working rom off the Google S4 for the I9500 any time soon as the heart of that phone is based upon a completely different architecture. And CM10.1 isn't on the I9500 at all as of yet, nowhere near.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, I thought CM10.1 was released on the i9500 too now! Oh well, I don't keep up on the i9500 much.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app

Related

CM mostly coming to S4!

Steve Kondik recently put up a post on Google+ in response to websites in general that were stating no CM support for the Galaxy S4. He stated that cyanogenmod definitely will support the S4, and hopefully this should put to rest all the rumors on this.
Source: https://plus.google.com/100275307499530023476/posts/U2Phq8KowGQ
ilabs said:
Steve Kondik recently put up a post on Google+ in response to websites in general that were stating no CM support for the Galaxy S4. He stated that cyanogenmod definitely will support the S4, and hopefully this should put to rest all the rumors on this.
Source: https://plus.google.com/100275307499530023476/posts/U2Phq8KowGQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd personally stick to stock rom. It's the most stable and offers the most features.
boodies said:
I'd personally stick to stock rom. It's the most stable and offers the most features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I try and keep my phones for a long time. I'm still using the i9000 and its been almost 3 years now. CM/AOSP is the one thing that helps keep my phone up to date even after the manufacturer stops supporting the device.
He has Mentioned S4 but which S4 GT-I9500 or GT-I9505
nitinvaid said:
He has Mentioned S4 but which S4 GT-I9500 or GT-I9505
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure it would be both variants, else he would have mentioned it.
ilabs said:
I'm sure it would be both variants, else he would have mentioned it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let's hope you are true
The one thing I love in Samsung phones over others is the fact that it has a buttload of software features. Now, that being said, what I love more is running AOSP on it or CM which means losing those features BUT if you've heard of dual boot....
Just seeing that post gave me a smile, I know what my next phone is
Cool...:good:
It's highly unlikely that the GT-I9500 [Exynos] variant would get stable CM if Samsung remain stingy with the codes required.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD
ilabs said:
I try and keep my phones for a long time. I'm still using the i9000 and its been almost 3 years now. CM/AOSP is the one thing that helps keep my phone up to date even after the manufacturer stops supporting the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only reason you're using cm is cause you're using an old phone that doesn't have any special features of touchwiz that came after the S3 and Note 2. I had the GS1, and I couldn't handle using stock for that. But after the S3, things have changed. Now Samsung offers much more on top of being the most stable and smoothest. There is no reason to lose features, even simple features such as MHL is gone with paranoid android. I am back on stock and can't be happier knowing things are smooth and no stupid bugs.
^^^^^^ totally disagree. May lose some Sammy features, but CM /AOSP offers the best customization and smoothness.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
scottspa74 said:
^^^^^^ totally disagree. May lose some Sammy features, but CM /AOSP offers the best customization and smoothness.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's all a matter of taste. Samsung has been including lots of customizations to its Touchwiz interface for the past couple of years.
Customizations that were only included on CM before are now present on Touchwiz and I'm really glad Samsung is paying attention to what people want.
That's my understating of it anyway. I'll still flash CM ROM's when a new Android comes just to see how it is before having to wait for Samsung to update it.
boodies said:
The only reason you're using cm is cause you're using an old phone that doesn't have any special features of touchwiz that came after the S3 and Note 2. I had the GS1, and I couldn't handle using stock for that. But after the S3, things have changed. Now Samsung offers much more on top of being the most stable and smoothest. There is no reason to lose features, even simple features such as MHL is gone with paranoid android. I am back on stock and can't be happier knowing things are smooth and no stupid bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I agree with you on that. Samsung does stuff in enough features that you may not need CM/AOSP. But my concern is still about after Samsung stops supporting the handset for android upgrades. I doubt I would have been able to run my i9000 on GB till now.
boodies said:
I'd personally stick to stock rom. It's the most stable and offers the most features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This times 500000000000 billion. Do not care about CM one bit.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Why not have the best of both worlds? Use the handset with stock for the first year or so, and then when Samsung is getting slow on the updates (or stopping) start rolling with AOSP. In a similar way when I built my computer I ran my processor and GPU like normal for a few years. After that, I started overclocking to help keep pace with games and stuff. That is, unless you intend to upgrade every year in which case it won't matter as much.
Masonfield said:
Why not have the best of both worlds? Use the handset with stock for the first year or so, and then when Samsung is getting slow on the updates (or stopping) start rolling with AOSP..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. To me that's the biggest upside of AOSP ROMs, having the latest version of Android. When you've always got the latest software it's a lot easier to hold onto your hardware for a while longer. I plan to stick with stock for quite a while.
boodies said:
I'd personally stick to stock rom. It's the most stable and offers the most features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
barondebxl said:
This times 500000000000 billion. Do not care about CM one bit.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then why even bother to post your obvious disdain here.. Couldn't resist the opportunity?
There are those of us that are looking forward to it..
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
But I doubt CM will still have the hand/eye gesture features.
scottspa74 said:
^^^^^^ totally disagree. May lose some Sammy features, but CM /AOSP offers the best customization and smoothness.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily. From my experience, touchwiz based ROMs get better battery life, stability etc. than CM. Or at worse, it's barely noticeable, even if such differences do exist. And you miss out on awesome dev - like Perseus on AOSP (best kernel for Note 2/SGS3 IMHO).
Can't wait to overclock an overclocked CPU with some CM!

Galaxy S4 Google Edition

The Google edition of this phone looks incredible, although its really expensive. I don't know if its even worth it, when ROMs like AOKP are available. I have a few issues with the idea of buying it or the desire to do so.
When the Google edition comes out, will the device even be able to use the hardware like the IR blaster? Also, will users on the ATT and other models be able to flash the ROM/firmware anyway?
What do you guys think? Are there any other advantages to the Google edition?
Sent from my SGH-I337 using xda premium
No IR support. Rumor has it for 4.3 release supposedly. If you don't have the Google edition you can't install it on none google versions and you won't get updates from Google. However I am sure there will be Dev who port it for the telco vendor versions to work.
That's so strange that they'd even consider selling hardware with components that aren't supported. So besides stock jelly bean (which doesn't even have the features of AOKP), the Google version has almost no advantages? And for more than three times the price? I saw earlier that they're on pre-order on eBay for $850. What's the point? I must be missing something.
Sent from my SGH-I337 using xda premium
This is the point, the Google Edition devices are meant to be developer friendly and showcase stock vanilla android...the IR blaster is something thats proprietary hence no AOSP code is available for it (stock android), drivers/source needs to be released for those components... the Google Edition devices are bootloader unlockeable unlike the ATT version (ours uses a bypass exploit to install custom things which by all accounts has been patched in a future OTA due to be released)....also they come factory sim unlocked...they will get Google Updates first before carrier branded devices, think of them as Nexuses without the Nexus name. I won't be getting a GE S4 as I have a Nexus and will wait for the next Nexus, however I'm excited to see the GE released as it means AOSP code will drop, this will help devs tremendously in fixing issues such as bluetooth.
Dankchild said:
That's so strange that they'd even consider selling hardware with components that aren't supported. So besides stock jelly bean (which doesn't even have the features of AOKP), the Google version has almost no advantages? And for more than three times the price? I saw earlier that they're on pre-order on eBay for $850. What's the point? I must be missing something.
Sent from my SGH-I337 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's less about the phone itself.
1. Having a stock rom version appeals to many advanced users, such as us on XDA. It has the stock experience, without the nexus line limitations, such as the SD card. It makes their die hard fans happy and most of us are very enthusiastic about it.
2. It is a key strategic move by Google. By allowing other manufacturers to sell "stock" versions on the play store, Google can move ahead and sell Motorola phones from the store without appearing to be biased to their own hardware. They're telling consumers they have options.
Unlike Apple this is what I like about Google. Give me options and let me decide which I want.
WarbyParker said:
It's less about the phone itself.
1. Having a stock rom version appeals to many advanced users, such as us on XDA. It has the stock experience, without the nexus line limitations, such as the SD card. It makes their die hard fans happy and most of us are very enthusiastic about it.
2. It is a key strategic move by Google. By allowing other manufacturers to sell "stock" versions on the play store, Google can move ahead and sell Motorola phones from the store without appearing to be biased to their own hardware. They're telling consumers they have options.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk about you guys but I find this amazing! I have fallen in love with the ir blaster I wish they would have it in the Google s4
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
Rumor is Android 4.3 will have native support for IR blasters.
I'd rather have an RF capability though.
I'm in a bind myself of what to do with the Google Edition S4. While I know that with this available to developers, ROMs will become much more stable, but really I'm not interested in that. I want to be able to completely flash my S4 to the Google Edition essentially, the biggest thing being able to receive OTA updates from Google. I imagine just downloading an image of the GE S4 and just flash it with Odin for example, and just go.
Is that realistically something that could happen, or is that just completely out of the question? I'm trying to avoid having to drop $650 on the same phone I already have, but don't want to wait to find out I can't do what I want, then be stuck with another Nexus 4 fiasco, where it's back-ordered for 2 months
Simonzi said:
I'm in a bind myself of what to do with the Google Edition S4. While I know that with this available to developers, ROMs will become much more stable, but really I'm not interested in that. I want to be able to completely flash my S4 to the Google Edition essentially, the biggest thing being able to receive OTA updates from Google. I imagine just downloading an image of the GE S4 and just flash it with Odin for example, and just go.
Is that realistically something that could happen, or is that just completely out of the question? I'm trying to avoid having to drop $650 on the same phone I already have, but don't want to wait to find out I can't do what I want, then be stuck with another Nexus 4 fiasco, where it's back-ordered for 2 months
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally in the same boat. I got this S4 last week and I'm already hearing that I'd have to drop $650US for the GE
Sent from my SGH-I337M using xda app-developers app
Personally I would not drop 650 on a phone you already have. You want the Google experience install CM10.1. You want touchwiz and IR you can go back to Samsung ROM. Plus I am sure DEVs will have the image ported to our phones. Its a waste of money imo. I would rather save that money for the new nexus or x phone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda premium
How does google know exactly which devices are "Nexus" devices? Do they send the updates out to a list based on known Nexus/GE IMEIs, or is there something in the ROM that sends a beacon to them asking for the udpates, or?
I'm really hoping I can just flash the GE ROM to my S4 and slip into the update loop like the rest of the Nexus/GE owners.
Jashyk said:
How does google know exactly which devices are "Nexus" devices? Do they send the updates out to a list based on known Nexus/GE IMEIs, or is there something in the ROM that sends a beacon to them asking for the udpates, or?
I'm really hoping I can just flash the GE ROM to my S4 and slip into the update loop like the rest of the Nexus/GE owners.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't speculate on how the phone actually gets the ROM update and/or how the almighty Google gods know which device it is, but I do know that when people got their LG Optimus G's running the Nexus 4 software, they were able to pull down OTAs from Google directly.
How many times can the same conversation be had on this site?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
thatbigmoose said:
I can't speculate on how the phone actually gets the ROM update and/or how the almighty Google gods know which device it is, but I do know that when people got their LG Optimus G's running the Nexus 4 software, they were able to pull down OTAs from Google directly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that sounds pretty awesome, definitely gives us hope then!
I don't know why anyone is surprised about price and features. Samsung is not going to alienate the carriers that sell 99% of their phones.
So isn't it supposed to be available today? Any know where and how to purchase one
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
plwalsh88 said:
How many times can the same conversation be had on this site?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol - over and over until the release the damn thing and we know for sure ...
Thursday isn't it ?
G. :angel:
Seriuosly when is this going to be released? I thought it was today too. I was trying to order it last night at midnight
Yes I was excited of purchasing it today but its on the 26th that it will go on sale.. :banghead: oh well two more days
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium

source code released for up coming 9505g google edition

will we see an official rom soon 2 for us 9505 users
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=GT-I9505G
I don't think that helps us one bit. Hope I'm proven wrong, though.
Nice ty.:angel:
I wonder what Ill get first Wednesday. Windows 8.1 preview or stock Android 4.2.2 for I9505 =]
Aerys said:
Nice ty.:angel:
I wonder what Ill get first Wednesday. Windows 8.1 preview or stock Android 4.2.2 for I9505 =]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even have to ask that? Android, of course! :victory:
any leaks yet team..
SALAH100 said:
any leaks yet team..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My friend, wait 1 day and we probably have official rom
How to use the code?
John Chu said:
How to use the code?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dial *#THE CODE# and your phone will change to GT-I9505G
DjeMBeY said:
Dial *#THE CODE# and your phone will change to GT-I9505G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Careful now, he might actually believe it.
I am still trying to figure out the logic of wanting the stock AOSP for the S4 from Samsung.
How will this be any different from running any other AOSP rom? I mean, if you check out PA GamerZ ROM, that works quite well as a daily driver. Why would we want to use this stock AOSP (with features that are quite basic)? Just to get 4.3 when it comes out? So? Some dev will port that anyways.
I mean, if someone bought the S4, wasn't it for the features? If anyone wanted stock AOSP then why not Nexus 4? Ok if hardware is the question, then really waiting for the next Nexus isn't that hard.
So can someone explain to me why?
kingzain900 said:
I am still trying to figure out the logic of wanting the stock AOSP for the S4 from Samsung.
How will this be any different from running any other AOSP rom? I mean, if you check out PA GamerZ ROM, that works quite well as a daily driver. Why would we want to use this stock AOSP (with features that are quite basic)? Just to get 4.3 when it comes out? So? Some dev will port that anyways.
I mean, if someone bought the S4, wasn't it for the features? If anyone wanted stock AOSP then why not Nexus 4? Ok if hardware is the question, then really waiting for the next Nexus isn't that hard.
So can someone explain to me why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For someone like me, it's not about running the stock AOSP on S4. It's about how it can improve the AOSP based custom roms like CM, PA, etc.
Hopefully, Samsung/Google will release proper source codes as quickly as for Nexus devices so that custom roms can run better on S4.
I've been using GS3 (i9305), mainly with CM for the last 10 months or so. It works ok as a daily driver, but not as well as it could've been, mainly because not all the necessary sources are available/released.
I tried Nexus 4 for about a couple of weeks and running CM was definately more fluid/enjoyable than on GS3.
But I couldn't really get used to not having the physical home button and lack of storage space. If GS4 Google Edition is released with exact same hardward as normal i9505, then this will be almost perfect - custom roms running as well as on Nexus devices with physical home button and MicroSD slot.
kingzain900 said:
I am still trying to figure out the logic of wanting the stock AOSP for the S4 from Samsung.
How will this be any different from running any other AOSP rom? I mean, if you check out PA GamerZ ROM, that works quite well as a daily driver. Why would we want to use this stock AOSP (with features that are quite basic)? Just to get 4.3 when it comes out? So? Some dev will port that anyways.
I mean, if someone bought the S4, wasn't it for the features? If anyone wanted stock AOSP then why not Nexus 4? Ok if hardware is the question, then really waiting for the next Nexus isn't that hard.
So can someone explain to me why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In simple terms.
Google gets to have its vanilla version of Android on a flagship device without having to subsidize the cost of designing the hardware.
Unlike Nexus devices where Google invests R&D money to make the hardware... having Samsung and HTC put a version of Stock Android on the device pretty much absolves Google of any financial liability in relation to hardware development.
Nexus devices are traditionally spartan... and Google likes it that way... but what if mobile manufacturers want to have nexus compatible device with all the bells and whistles... they will all compete on who has the most Nexus compatible device.
This will attract developers and customers that prefer the stock Google experience
Bear in mind also Google is still developing their Motorola flagship device... this has handset makers very jittery.
Having a GE also puts the latest Android on a device and puts pressure on the makers of the device to move build it out into their MAIN version of Android.
So Key lime pie or 4.3 should come quicker on the HTC and S4 than would be tradtional.
Another issues is transparency.
For too long handset makers have said "our phone can't run the latest version of Android" when we know they lie.
Samsung has been good.. the S2 has JB while the HTC Sensation 4G has all but been dumped by their makers.
Companies that have a Google edition will have that extra edge in longevity.
Gillion said:
In simple terms.
Google gets to have its vanilla version of Android on a flagship device without having to subsidize the cost of designing the hardware.
Unlike Nexus devices where Google invests R&D money to make the hardware... having Samsung and HTC put a version of Stock Android on the device pretty much absolves Google of any financial liability in relation to hardware development.
Nexus devices are traditionally spartan... and Google likes it that way... but what if mobile manufacturers want to have nexus compatible device with all the bells and whistles... they will all compete on who has the most Nexus compatible device.
This will attract developers and customers that prefer the stock Google experience
Bear in mind also Google is still developing their Motorola flagship device... this has handset makers very jittery.
Having a GE also puts the latest Android on a device and puts pressure on the makers of the device to move build it out into their MAIN version of Android.
So Key lime pie or 4.3 should come quicker on the HTC and S4 than would be tradtional.
Another issues is transparency.
For too long handset makers have said "our phone can't run the latest version of Android" when we know they lie.
Samsung has been good.. the S2 has JB while the HTC Sensation 4G has all but been dumped by their makers.
Companies that have a Google edition will have that extra edge in longevity.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good answer. Makes sense. It'd be exciting to see what Motorola device Google releases. MoNex (MoNey?).
kingzain900 said:
Very good answer. Makes sense. It'd be exciting to see what Motorola device Google releases. MoNex (MoNey?).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This could be the much rumored Google X Phone...
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Theshawty said:
Careful now, he might actually believe it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Easy, everyone knows that to work, he'd to input: *#THE SOURCE CODE# , otherwiste it will not work :laugh:
what time the phone will be up for eating anyone knows?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
big_b0sss said:
what time the phone will be up for eating anyone knows?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't think I'd want to eat a phone, actually.
Bet it'll be up noonish, USA time, which means roughly 18.00-19.00 Brit time.
big_b0sss said:
what time the phone will be up for eating anyone knows?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it can be all day in USA
Aerys said:
I think it can be all day in USA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah thats right all day i remember how nexus 4 was eaten within an hour
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
big_b0sss said:
yeah thats right all day i remember how nexus 4 was eaten within an hour
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope we get firmware today

Android 4.3 Leaked... Portable to S3?

http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/28/android-4-3-spotted-on-samsung-galaxy-s-4-available-now/
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/06/28...05-ported-from-google-play-edition-gt-i9505g/
It's been ported to a Snapdragon processor so I figure that opens at least some opportunity for a port to the U.S S3. Just wondering if it was possible.
Cool will see
My guess would be no, but who knows. I know things like hardware files, libs, kernel, etc. Would have to be worked on because that is a quad core processor. Our US S3's are only dual core.
It would be easier to port to a US S4, since the hardware is the same.
NightxFall said:
http://www.engadget.com/2013/06/28/android-4-3-spotted-on-samsung-galaxy-s-4-available-now/
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/06/28...05-ported-from-google-play-edition-gt-i9505g/
It's been ported to a Snapdragon processor so I figure that opens at least some opportunity for a port to the U.S S3. Just wondering if it was possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have read both articles it is meant for the s4 so no it won't be on our phones. It takes way more time and skills to port a quad core optimized 4.3 to a dual core device for that the devs should get paid for the time spent. It makes sense for the devs to spend what little free time they have on a 4.1.2 Touchwiz and 4.2.2 stock Android made especially for our device.
Why wait for a port of 4.3 when the actual source comes out it will be better. Not a big rush to get 4.3 not much a different
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Off topic but can anyone get the camera from this working on d2vzw without crashing on normal pictures?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Can't see anyone wasting time crow barring this into our phone. I see nothing that makes me want it. Seems like it should be 4.2.3 not 4.3.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
soapinmouth said:
Off topic but can anyone get the camera from this working on d2vzw without crashing on normal pictures?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My phone restarts when I take a picture with the front camera.
rmg88888888 said:
My phone restarts when I take a picture with the front camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try a different Kernel. That issue resolved itself by doing that.
I used http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1853816
Peace
wwonka69 said:
try a different Kernel. That issue resolved itself by doing that.
I used http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1853816
Peace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that and it still crashed
To get back on topic of this thread...
Will a 4.3 firmware ever be ported to the galaxy s3? Ive researched on this topic for about a half hour now and have only came acoss the CM build that has 4.3 for the dual core s3....
I apologize if this has been answered elsewhere in a different thread
I don't know what u guys are waiting for, I guess u guys really love TW but the Aosp 4.3 Roms that are available are amazing. I'm on Eclipse now and its easily a DD. Not 1 issue to report. Try it and I bet u won't care when 4.3 officially drops.
RealMuphukkinG said:
To get back on topic of this thread...
Will a 4.3 firmware ever be ported to the galaxy s3? Ive researched on this topic for about a half hour now and have only came acoss the CM build that has 4.3 for the dual core s3....
I apologize if this has been answered elsewhere in a different thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No as no one wants to crow bar firmware meant for a higher end version of the phone.
Samsung is pushing wearable devices (e.g. its Smartwatch) which uses Bluetooth's new low-powered features in Android 4.3. Because the Smartwatch requires being connected to one's phone for optimal use, can we assume that Samsung will want to release a 4.3 version of Touchwiz for the Galaxy S3?
Comp625 said:
Samsung is pushing wearable devices (e.g. its Smartwatch) which uses Bluetooth's new low-powered features in Android 4.3. Because the Smartwatch requires being connected to one's phone for optimal use, can we assume that Samsung will want to release a 4.3 version of Touchwiz for the Galaxy S3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you can assume that but you won't find out until next month.
TokedUp said:
I don't know what u guys are waiting for, I guess u guys really love TW but the Aosp 4.3 Roms that are available are amazing. I'm on Eclipse now and its easily a DD. Not 1 issue to report. Try it and I bet u won't care when 4.3 officially drops.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally, I have yet to find a 4.3 ROM/Kernel combination where I can get all of the features I want.
1. Photosphere camera that doesn't FC. Either FFC or FFVC always locks me up. I have a 4 year old daughter and I can't be messing around with reboots if I need to cath her doing something silly.
2. Group SMS. (PAC ROM has this, but I haven't seen any others.) I am not interested in GoSMS or Handsent.
TW gives me the Samsung Camera, and I can install the Photosphere camera and use with no issues.
TW gives me reliable Group SMS.
If you know of a 4.3 ROM/Kernel combination that will allow me to use ALL features of the Photophere enabled camera, please advise me.

When are we getting updated to 4.2.2?

My wife's tab 2 got updated last week...
Anyone know what features we will see?
I'm quite keen to know what to expect and when.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
charmz2k2 said:
My wife's tab 2 got updated last week...
Anyone know what features we will see?
I'm quite keen to know what to expect and when.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you mean 4.3, your Note 10.1 is currently on 4.2.2 if you are using Cyanomod 10.1
About 4.3, you can expect some improvements on multi user support (like blocking some apps for each user), a better phone app, the new gapps so the new camera and hopefully better battery performance. No big deal in my opinion
serdasteclas said:
I guess you mean 4.3, your Note 10.1 is currently on 4.2.2 if you are using Cyanomod 10.1
About 4.3, you can expect some improvements on multi user support (like blocking some apps for each user), a better phone app, the new gapps so the new camera and hopefully better battery performance. No big deal in my opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe he is asking about stock OTA update... doesn't seem like his using custom rom when asking like that,.
Hi everyone,
I believe we all would like to get 4.2/4.3 OTA update from Samsung. For people like me, multiwindow tasking is very important and I don't want to lose it with CM/AOKP. It is very weird that Samsung hasn't updated our Note 10.1. I still think it is by far the best choice in tablets world. Lets keep our fingers crossed, so Samsung updates directly to 4.3 (So then this delay feels reasonable) and also includes Multi-User.
Franzuu said:
Hi everyone,
I believe we all would like to get 4.2/4.3 OTA update from Samsung. For people like me, multiwindow tasking is very important and I don't want to lose it with CM/AOKP. It is very weird that Samsung hasn't updated our Note 10.1. I still think it is by far the best choice in tablets world. Lets keep our fingers crossed, so Samsung updates directly to 4.3 (So then this delay feels reasonable) and also includes Multi-User.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
some were on the net i read that our pad will get the next major update ie the KLP directly lets hope for the best :good::laugh:
haree said:
hi
some were on the net i read that our pad will get the next major update ie the KLP directly lets hope for the best :good::laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung said that note 10.1 will get an update to 5.0 and from some sources I heard we will directly get it. But this was before android 4.3. So I guess we are in queue for android 4.3. Klp is a pretty long way off.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
akshayguptaus said:
Samsung said that note 10.1 will get an update to 5.0 and from some sources I heard we will directly get it. But this was before android 4.3. So I guess we are in queue for android 4.3. Klp is a pretty long way off.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
hope it happens soon every samsung phone is getting the 4.3 update except us :crying:
note got it this is were i read it see this link : http://technosamigos.com/samsung-galaxy-android-4-3-jelly-bean-update/
link 2 : http://technosamigos.com/samsung-galaxy-phones-android-5-0-key-lime-pie-update-schedule/

Categories

Resources