Related
What have you guys found to be your favorite app for overclocking? I'm trying to figure out which the best one is, but not sure where to begin. SetCPU? System Tuner? Daemon? Juice Defender? What have been your experiences, and what are you using now?
Bump
Sent from my HTC Sensation
nrvnqsrxk said:
Bump
Sent from my HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I think you will find that every ROM/KERNEL Developer has their own favorite.
I'm not sure that any single one is better than the next.
Try each one for yourself,and see how it works for you.
Thanks. I realize some ROM/kernel combinations are more synergistic than others. Currently on Pyramid 3D running Bricked 0.91, using System Tuner as recommended by Show. Not sure if the other ones support dual core.
So far I've tried OC Daemon, SetCPU, Juice Defender, and System Tuner. They all work well, but I'm not sure which one has the best performance to battery ratio. I'm pretty new to this overclocking thing, so trying to establish a baseline to which I can make comparison to, using XDA as a resource. Otherwise I'd be spending a week with each app. Granted, this would probably yield better results since I'd be more aware of the pros and cons of each relative to my personal requirements, but I was hoping I could just skip the learning curve if I could, naw meen.
Sent from my HTC Sensation
nrvnqsrxk said:
Thanks. I realize some ROM/kernel combinations are more synergistic than others. Currently on Pyramid 3D running Bricked 0.91, using System Tuner as recommended by Show. Not sure if the other ones support dual core.
So far I've tried OC Daemon, SetCPU, Juice Defender, and System Tuner. They all work well, but I'm not sure which one has the best performance to battery ratio. I'm pretty new to this overclocking thing, so trying to establish a baseline to which I can make comparison to, using XDA as a resource. Otherwise I'd be spending a week with each app. Granted, this would probably yield better results since I'd be more aware of the pros and cons of each relative to my personal requirements, but I was hoping I could just skip the learning curve if I could, naw meen.
Sent from my HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Yes, I know what you mean.
In my experience,using MY phone the way I like to use it,is not the same as anyone else.
So, although I can get snippets of information from others, I will only truly find it out by myself.
I'm fairly new to rooting, familiar with jailbreaking (That garbage is too simple and chalked full of ad's). Not sure if the android market should be a main source for rooted apps, or if there's a website I should check out, etc. I'm just looking for lists of things to try, and suggestions by others. Any tuts or starter guides would be appreciated too.
The main thing is flashing a custom Rom. It does wonders for your phone. Just make sure you read the stickies for all the sections. You should be fine if you just read those.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
Here is quick guide that will help on how to.
mossination said:
The main thing is flashing a custom Rom. It does wonders for your phone. Just make sure you read the stickies for all the sections. You should be fine if you just read those.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do ROMS offer exactly? Do they include modified kernels? anything like that.
Jonnysoterrible said:
What do ROMS offer exactly? Do they include modified kernels? anything like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read custom Rom threads. They have every feature they offer listed. Some offer overclock which is a kernel feature. Most have debloated apps. Most have ciq removed. They all offer different things. Like tweaks, different theming, etc...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
I'm still a new Android user myself, coming from iPhone. I rooted and flashed the skyROCKeteer ROM. My phone has been much more enjoyable for me.
Since I've been rooted, I've purchased/installed, JuiceDefender, ROM Manager and Titanium Backup. I'd have to say my biggest change has been the great increase of battery life.
Sur2eaL said:
I'm still a new Android user myself, coming from iPhone. I rooted and flashed the skyROCKeteer ROM. My phone has been much more enjoyable for me.
Since I've been rooted, I've purchased/installed, JuiceDefender, ROM Manager and Titanium Backup. I'd have to say my biggest change has been the great increase of battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a technician for Sprint PCS, I see very common software issues with Juice defender. It tends to cause data lockups, and issues with the phone being able to run applications, certain games , etc. Haven't used titan backup, since I don't really horde all my applications.
Are there any decent overclock utilities for the skyrocket? Or do I have to use a ROM with a modified kernel?
Well actually ....overclocking can be much more damaging then juice defender. But yeah you need a custom kernel to overclock.
go the opposite route, this phone is so wicked fast, try undervolting and underclocking, increase battery life
Make a back-up of your phone before performing any mod's or flashing it and manually back-up all photos, videos, bookmarks and etc. that is irrecoverable. Trust me!
Howdy, So I just got my first smart phone a few weeks ago, the AT&T Skyrocket. Kinda odd since I have been in IT works for many years that it took so long but could never afford the upgrade, my cars sap every spare penny lol.
After getting the phone I spent a few days getting to know it and then rooted it so I could use Titanium backup.
Now long story short due to an unrelated issue with ATT they sent me another phone to fix an issue I told them was on their end (and sure enough, it is, I think I figured it out though, anyone else get charged for a text message when the ATT family map "pings" the device?).
So for the time being I have 2 skyrocket phones and figured this was as good a time as any to try out another rom/kernal on the 2nd phone in case I don't like it my phone will remain untouched (I am picky about how my computers are setup).
So that is the history lesson, I have read sooo much the last few weeks it has gave me a good handle on the general process ect. My issue is picking out an actual rom/kernal to use, I have read so much they are all just one big garble of random info and I could use some advice to pick out what would work for me.
Here is what I want out of a rom/Kernal:
Clock speeds/voltages unlocked, I am an oldschool overclocker so naturally I feel everything can be made better.
Better battery life, Right now the battery life is ok but a bit too close for my tastes and I also feel it is just draining too fast for what I am doing (about ~8-10%/Hour average).
Some improvements like the light meter being linear vs having big steps would also be nice, I know the sensor itself can do it from the the screens but the software just goes in steps I guess.
Stable! I want something rock solid stable that I can count on for a long time to come.
Thats about it, The stock rom works fine for my needs minus those complaints. The clock/voltages being the biggest complaint if I had to go with only a kernal to keep a stable ROM.
So what suggestions do ya'll have? Is there by any chance a modded stock rom that is just debloated ect but will still be stable, that would work nice if it helped battery life some combined with a kernal I think.
I don't mind trying a few combos of roms/kernals but only have a week or 2 before I have to send this phone back and would need to fully test each one so I figure I only have time to do that on a handful in that time frame (I am very through)
Rom I have no clue what would work best for me. Kernal the Faux looks pretty good for my goals but I am not sure.
Any advice would be great.
From personal experience, anything made by forum member mhx is incredible. His ROMs are always super stable and and stripped of bloat. It also has the best battery out of all the ROMs I've tried.
Mhx's Gingerbread ROM
Mhx's ICS ROM
This is the kernel that I use Faux's Kernel
Kagenui said:
From personal experience, anything made by forum member mhx is incredible. His ROMs are always super stable and and stripped of bloat. It also has the best battery out of all the ROMs I've tried.
Mhx's Gingerbread ROM
Mhx's ICS ROM
This is the kernel that I use Faux's Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, Those roms look nice for sure!
That brings up another question I have. I keep reading all this stuff about ICS but have not been able to figure out why it is such a big deal. Looks like just a different theme to me or is it more then that?
Is it more like going from windows 95 to 98? Or like 98 to Windows 7?
Is it worth going with ICS over the gingerbread?
Lastly I notice that they say they come with kernels, Does that mean I have to use those kernels? I assume this is not the case since you are using a different kernel but better safe then sorry.
Thanks for the help!
Texas_Ace said:
Thanks, Those roms look nice for sure!
That brings up another question I have. I keep reading all this stuff about ICS but have not been able to figure out why it is such a big deal. Looks like just a different theme to me or is it more then that?
Is it more like going from windows 95 to 98? Or like 98 to Windows 7?
Is it worth going with ICS over the gingerbread?
Lastly I notice that they say they come with kernels, Does that mean I have to use those kernels? I assume this is not the case since you are using a different kernel but better safe then sorry.
Thanks for the help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are wanting a rock solid stable phone I would avoid the ICS madness for now, it's not quite perfected yet. You don't have to use the kernel they come with.
xcrazydx said:
If you are wanting a rock solid stable phone I would avoid the ICS madness for now, it's not quite perfected yet. You don't have to use the kernel they come with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I was kinda thinking that. For future reference, what does ICS offer that Gingerbread doesn't?
So I take it that this means there are stable gingerbread roms that should at least come close to stock for reliability/functionality long term? Any opinion on the above mentioned rom/Kernal combo?
Texas_Ace said:
Thanks, Those roms look nice for sure!
That brings up another question I have. I keep reading all this stuff about ICS but have not been able to figure out why it is such a big deal. Looks like just a different theme to me or is it more then that?
Is it more like going from windows 95 to 98? Or like 98 to Windows 7?
Is it worth going with ICS over the gingerbread?
Lastly I notice that they say they come with kernels, Does that mean I have to use those kernels? I assume this is not the case since you are using a different kernel but better safe then sorry.
Thanks for the help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This article sums it up nicely.
http://www.androidauthority.com/android-2-3-gingerbread-vs-android-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-37742/
Kagenui said:
This article sums it up nicely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that, I had not seen a list of the features listed out like that before. I think I am starting to see what all the buzz is now.
I plan on flashing the rom/kernel you posted earlier tonight, if anyone else has a suggestion for a follow up combo to try feel free to share!
Last I heard OCing of ICS is not possible yet, so since you mentioned that, ICS is out for a good while.
edgex said:
Last I heard OCing of ICS is not possible yet, so since you mentioned that, ICS is out for a good while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, yeah that would put that off for a little while. Think I might try it out before returning the phone so at least I know if I am interested in it but just gonna stick with the most stable gingerbread rom for now.
Texas_Ace said:
Thanks, I was kinda thinking that. For future reference, what does ICS offer that Gingerbread doesn't?
So I take it that this means there are stable gingerbread roms that should at least come close to stock for reliability/functionality long term? Any opinion on the above mentioned rom/Kernal combo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah there are a number of stable GB roms. nexusmod4, mhx superlite, seanz skyics, tpcv3, silver ROM. Read through the threads and see what people think. I prefer nexusmod as my daily, but all those are good
Sent from SKYROCKET
NexusMod 4.0
Romracer 0.3
xcrazydx said:
Yeah there are a number of stable GB roms. nexusmod4, mhx superlite, seanz skyics, tpcv3, silver ROM. Read through the threads and see what people think. I prefer nexusmod as my daily, but all those are good
Sent from SKYROCKET
NexusMod 4.0
Romracer 0.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, out of those the MHX, nexus and silver rom look to be the most up my alley, should at least give me a good idea if an aftermarket rom is for me.
One question I have is they all mention needing new Modem files flashed? This is different then the radios? Anything I should know about that aspect of it?
xcrazydx said:
Yeah there are a number of stable GB roms. nexusmod4, mhx superlite, seanz skyics, tpcv3, silver ROM. Read through the threads and see what people think. I prefer nexusmod as my daily, but all those are good
Sent from SKYROCKET
NexusMod 4.0
Romracer 0.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed, all those x listed have proven to be extrememly stable. For best battery life with OC'ing and undervolting support use any of those roms with faux's 010m kernel. I was getting 1% battery almost every two hours with that, fauxclock app undervolt -100mV, and tpc v3, before i switched to ics
Texas_Ace said:
Thanks, out of those the MHX, nexus and silver rom look to be the most up my alley, should at least give me a good idea if an aftermarket rom is for me.
One question I have is they all mention needing new Modem files flashed? This is different then the radios? Anything I should know about that aspect of it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, modern = radio. I always flash the radio before the ROM
Sent from SKYROCKET
NexusMod 4.0
Romracer 0.3
icenight89 said:
agreed, all those x listed have proven to be extrememly stable. For best battery life with OC'ing and undervolting support use any of those roms with faux's 010m kernel. I was getting 1% battery almost every two hours with that, fauxclock app undervolt -100mV, and tpc v3, before i switched to ics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed the 010m kernel on the stock rom to play with that first and ran into something I am not sure about.
I tried both system tuner and fauxclock, at first everything was working as it should then I noticed that the 2nd core said "offline" and it won't seem to come on no matter what even while running stress tests. Any ideas?
Texas_Ace said:
That brings up another question I have. I keep reading all this stuff about ICS but have not been able to figure out why it is such a big deal. Looks like just a different theme to me or is it more then that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's more than that. It's a lot smoother and faster, better performance in everything, hardware accelerated UI, better multitasking.
It's the biggest update the OS has ever gotten, period. Yeah, it's still Android at the end of the day, but it's a pretty big refinement.
Frogacuda said:
It's more than that. It's a lot smoother and faster, better performance in everything, hardware accelerated UI, better multitasking.
It's the biggest update the OS has ever gotten, period. Yeah, it's still Android at the end of the day, but it's a pretty big refinement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I am starting to see that.
Back to the issue of the 2nd core going offline, After some playing around the only way I could seem to get it to come back online was to install SetCPU along with fauxclock. This seems to make the 2nd core come online but I am worried that running both apps will cause issues with them fighting over who has control?
I much prefer setCPU for the clock speed controls due to the profiles I can create but no voltage control. Is it possible to use the faux for voltage and the setCPU for clock speed control? Or am I asking for problems?
Texas_Ace said:
Yeah, I am starting to see that.
Back to the issue of the 2nd core going offline, After some playing around the only way I could seem to get it to come back online was to install SetCPU along with fauxclock. This seems to make the 2nd core come online but I am worried that running both apps will cause issues with them fighting over who has control?
I much prefer setCPU for the clock speed controls due to the profiles I can create but no voltage control. Is it possible to use the faux for voltage and the setCPU for clock speed control? Or am I asking for problems?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definately asking for problems. Only use ONE cpu controlling app. SetCPU does have better profiles but fauxclock has a few. Which rom were u using it with? It does disable the 2nd core by default to save battery, but enabled it as soon as it is required (i.e. games and/or benchmark.) TO check run a force close setcpu and run a benchmark, then home back to menu and run setcpu, it will show 2nd core as active.
icenight89 said:
Definately asking for problems. Only use ONE cpu controlling app. SetCPU does have better profiles but fauxclock has a few. Which rom were u using it with? It does disable the 2nd core by default to save battery, but enabled it as soon as it is required (i.e. games and/or benchmark.) TO check run a force close setcpu and run a benchmark, then home back to menu and run setcpu, it will show 2nd core as active.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that, the 2nd core stays offline no matter what I do unless I run setcpu.
I would just run setCPU but then I would not be able to undervolt. I wounder if I could use one of these scripts http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20946429&postcount=574
That would take care of the undervolt and then use setcpu to handle the clock speeds? That would seem to be the best of both worlds.
not recommended. Use system tuner instead. It has almost as much profile control as setcpu, but the voltage control of fauxclock. It also has an option to force both cores online.
icenight89 said:
not recommended. Use system tuner instead. It has almost as much profile control as setcpu, but the voltage control of fauxclock. It also has an option to force both cores online.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried it but didn't care for it. Still didn't have the profiling options I want. I like the setcpu since I can set it to have different CPU speeds at different times/situations. Maybe that is not worth the power savings. Whats wrong with setcpu?
I also had the same problem with system tuner as well, it would not bring the 2nd core online.
I was hoping to get some of your guys' input. SynergyROM's or CleanROM? Not just newest specific builds but ROM in general. I've been on Synergy since the day I have rooted by GS3 but read somewhere that it might not be as good as CleanROM but I can't find specific reason in the development section so I thought I'd post this here. I like Synergy and the kernel it comes with but I like to flash things in order to test so hopefully I could get some specifics.
Thanks
Well, I will say this...I was using SynergyRom Nightly v1.7 a few days ago and I since switched over to CleanRom 2.0/CleanKernel 1.0 and it was much smoother than Synergy!! I was experiencing alot of lag going between apps and homescreen. I just flashed CleanRom 2.1 and it just keeps getting better!! I would suggest to you to try CleanRom 2.1, and im pretty sure you will be pleased with this build.
nighthawk34691 said:
Well, I will say this...I was using SynergyRom Nightly v1.7 a few days ago and I since switched over to CleanRom 2.0/CleanKernel 1.0 and it was much smoother than Synergy!! I was experiencing alot of lag going between apps and homescreen. I just flashed CleanRom 2.1 and it just keeps getting better!! I would suggest to you to try CleanRom 2.1, and im pretty sure you will be pleased with this build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I will flash it right now. I'm a flash-aholic but I generally try to stick with one "brand." I've read some great things about CleanROM so I think it's time to switch and check it out
I will say all of this with complete honesty. I started with Synergy and kept going with it through the nightlies.
Then came along Scott who used to dev for the Rezound which I had and ran his CleanROM on that phone.
Long story short, my vote is for CleanROM 2.1. By a decent margin actually. It's just smoother and faster. Not only is real world performance better, but benchmarks are better too.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
WizeGuyDezignz said:
I will say all of this with complete honesty. I started with Synergy and kept going with it through the nightlies.
Then came along Scott who used to dev for the Rezound which I had and ran his CleanROM on that phone.
Long story short, my vote is for CleanROM 2.1. By a decent margin actually. It's just smoother and faster. Not only is real world performance better, but benchmarks are better too.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny you say that about the Rezound...I just installed CleanRom Standard 4.5 on my wifes Rezound the other night because I couldnt get any other Rom to work on her phone and it runs great and momma is happy about here phone not being all "Bloated" up...lol... and it runs great!
Yep, Scott seems to be a very intellegent dev and out of all the roms ive used...CleanRom 2.1 is by far the best most smoothest and stable rom ive used.
WizeGuyDezignz said:
I will say all of this with complete honesty. I started with Synergy and kept going with it through the nightlies.
Then came along Scott who used to dev for the Rezound which I had and ran his CleanROM on that phone.
Long story short, my vote is for CleanROM 2.1. By a decent margin actually. It's just smoother and faster. Not only is real world performance better, but benchmarks are better too.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nighthawk34691 said:
Funny you say that about the Rezound...I just installed CleanRom Standard 4.5 on my wifes Rezound the other night because I couldnt get any other Rom to work on her phone and it runs great and momma is happy about here phone not being all "Bloated" up...lol... and it runs great!
Yep, Scott seems to be a very intellegent dev and out of all the roms ive used...CleanRom 2.1 is by far the best most smoothest and stable rom ive used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! I've flashed it since and can't complain yet.... Transitions seem very smooth
ghilliek9 said:
Awesome! I've flashed it since and can't complain yet.... Transitions seem very smooth
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you noticed any difference in battery life from Synergy to CleanROM? I've been on the Synergy nightlies up to now and am looking for a change...
These threads are pointless....
Flash them both and see which one you like!! Geez...lol.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Tredd626 said:
Have you noticed any difference in battery life from Synergy to CleanROM? I've been on the Synergy nightlies up to now and am looking for a change...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me, I have had much better battery life on the SynergyROM (Ziggy kernel) but now I'm trying out that 747 kernel...seems ok. I still have SynergyROM r55 saved and that was the best for battery for me. I use battery monitor widget and always look at the mA's that are being used up and the numbers staid low on r55. They staid much lower on the games I played and also in general. That app kind of gives me the best idea as far as consumption. Its great!
But the ROM itself seems a lot smoother with fewer FC's on things.
ghilliek9 said:
For me, I have had much better battery life on the SynergyROM (Ziggy kernel) but now I'm trying out that 747 kernel...seems ok. I still have SynergyROM r55 saved and that was the best for battery for me. I use battery monitor widget and always look at the mA's that are being used up and the numbers staid low on r55. They staid much lower on the games I played and also in general. That app kind of gives me the best idea as far as consumption. Its great!
But the ROM itself seems a lot smoother with fewer FC's on things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on CleanROM 2.0 and it seems great. No problems whatsoever, and good enough battery life for me. I was on Synergy 1.4 before, that was fine too. But all of the nightlies seem fraught with problems creeping in, and I don't want to reflash a lot of times. What I really want is a ROM that is reliable, and will work with the APP2ExtSD hack, but none I've tried does it.
1ManWolfePack said:
These threads are pointless....
Flash them both and see which one you like!! Geez...lol.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think they are pointless at all. Just looking for some feedback. Replies like yours are pointless and do nothing for the thread. I have been curious too, and the thread gave me some insight.
420fan said:
I don't think they are pointless at all. Just looking for some feedback. Replies like yours are pointless and do nothing for the thread. I have been curious too, and the thread gave me some insight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. That's the point of these threads/forums is to ask questions and get input not just from the devs but also from the users and everybody's wealth of knowledge.
It's because of the input here that I have decided to give CleanROM a shot. Sure I could have flashed it and not noticed a difference but I wanted some concrete statements from the many users who could give me some facts about the differences in the ROMs. Anyway, both Dev's are brilliant...I wish I could somehow use the Kernel from Synergys r55 ROM on CleanROM...I'll have to see if there is a way to extract just the kernel from the r55 zip
My experience with synergy Rom wasn't pleasant. There is too much going on especially since it's in nightlies. Nit the best of battery life either. I've been following Scott's cleanrom and cleankernel. This combo has surpassed all my expectations. Great battery life and performance. Very stable and clean. If you want to get the most usage with the top performance install cleanrom. Cleankernel and leankernel are neck in neck for me. They both do as advertised. I just like cleankernel because it is made to be stable and save battery while delivering performance. I'm running at 1ghz and there is no lag.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
vx2ko said:
My experience with synergy Rom wasn't pleasant. There is too much going on especially since it's in nightlies. Nit the best of battery life either. I've been following Scott's cleanrom and cleankernel. This combo has surpassed all my expectations. Great battery life and performance. Very stable and clean. If you want to get the most usage with the top performance install cleanrom. Cleankernel and leankernel are neck in neck for me. They both do as advertised. I just like cleankernel because it is made to be stable and save battery while delivering performance. I'm running at 1ghz and there is no lag.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1ghz ... damn...I have mine at 1.2 and also get amazing battery life....thanks for the input. The more and more I use it, the more I'm liking CleanROM!
I enjoyed Synergy! Everything I used on a day to day basis was running without any hiccups.
Clean ROM 2.1/CleanKernel 1.2
android94301 said:
I'm on CleanROM 2.0 and it seems great. No problems whatsoever, and good enough battery life for me. I was on Synergy 1.4 before, that was fine too. But all of the nightlies seem fraught with problems creeping in, and I don't want to reflash a lot of times. What I really want is a ROM that is reliable, and will work with the APP2ExtSD hack, but none I've tried does it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am a noob at this stuff still and flashed Clean ROM 2.1 and CleanKernel 1.2 last night, which was my first ROM. I LOVE it compared to the stock Touchwiz OS. It's OH so smooth and zippy! I will probably stick with this rom for a good while! I installed the Nova launcher to try it out and like it as well. I REALLY like the fact that you can change the quick panel widget buttons!!! I am experiencing a small problem however, and wanted to see if anyone else was running into the same thing...
Using the stock alarm clock widget I set my music by choosing one of my music files, but every time I click on "choose file" it locks up and says that the clock has stopped working. It also happens when I try and choose a ringtone for a specific contact out of my music files. I have searched the clean rom thread and one other person was having the issue, but no one else was, so it never got addressed. And being new to the forum, I can't post on that thread yet.
Anyone else having this issue?
mooremh said:
I am a noob at this stuff still and flashed Clean ROM 2.1 and CleanKernel 1.2 last night, which was my first ROM. I LOVE it compared to the stock Touchwiz OS. It's OH so smooth and zippy! I will probably stick with this rom for a good while! I installed the Nova launcher to try it out and like it as well. I REALLY like the fact that you can change the quick panel widget buttons!!! I am experiencing a small problem however, and wanted to see if anyone else was running into the same thing...
Using the stock alarm clock widget I set my music by choosing one of my music files, but every time I click on "choose file" it locks up and says that the clock has stopped working. It also happens when I try and choose a ringtone for a specific contact out of my music files. I have searched the clean rom thread and one other person was having the issue, but no one else was, so it never got addressed. And being new to the forum, I can't post on that thread yet.
Anyone else having this issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that's because u r on nova launcher, I also use it and that's only because I can change the pixel density so everything is much smaller ( I use an app called density changer its awesome when set to 240)but anyway go into the stock music player find a song click and hold on it and then you will have the option of selecting it as an alarm clock that has worked for me.
Basically I installed yesterday, and my phone went dry fast.
What's a good ROM with a decent battery life, that runs decently fast, and looks decent as well.
Listing PROs and CONs would be nice.
Thank you! :good:
Anything non-experimental...
Like Gingerbread... and uh, Froyo.
Your choice.
buru898 said:
Anything non-experimental...
Like Gingerbread... and uh, Froyo.
Your choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any specific GB that you would recommend...?
I can't really be testing out ROMs and finding out bugs myself, I use my phone a lot throughout the day, so I want something that will work almost to perfection. If possible.
mald55 said:
Any specific GB that you would recommend...?
I can't really be testing out ROMs and finding out bugs myself, I use my phone a lot throughout the day, so I want something that will work almost to perfection. If possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use cm7, more specifically tmesk's build. Probably spelt that wrong, but you'll see it. If you don't use Bluetooth calling then everything should work. I've been on this build since it was first ported.
Or just use one of the modded stock ROMs.
Also, if you use setCPU, try antutu CPU master, supposedly setCPU keeps both cores active.
buru898 said:
Use cm7, more specifically tmesk's build. Probably spelt that wrong, but you'll see it. If you don't use Bluetooth calling then everything should work. I've been on this build since it was first ported.
Or just use one of the modded stock ROMs.
Also, if you use setCPU, try antutu CPU master, supposedly setCPU keeps both cores active.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I will give them a shot!
PS: Could you give me the correct name of the ROM you suggested? I tried looking it on the forums and Google and couldn't come up with anything.
Thanks again!