Exactly what do these scores mean along with what is the norm? I have CleanRom 5.5.1 w/ LeanKernel 1.2.1.
Stock JB
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
what the scores mean? its running slow?
slufa111 said:
what the scores mean? its running slow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To my understanding it's an estimated test of the processing power/speed of the chipset.
Idk what up with you guys phone but here's mine..
This is stock everything. No root.
Your not that far from me that I should be worried.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
I don't understand how you guys all get such high scores. I've never gone above 4600 on Stock or CM10.......nothing overclocked. Do you guys do some crazy preparation on your phone prior to running tests to get such high scores?
I just flashed the ROM and Kernel and reinstalled all my apps for me...then ran it. If its anything, I kill all apps.
slufa111 said:
I just flashed the ROM and Kernel and reinstalled all my apps for me...then ran it. If its anything, I kill all apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did the same
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Very decent battery life.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Benchmarks are really inconsistent in these programs. As long as you think it's fast on YOUR phone, that's all that counts.
Synergy ROM and l535VRBLK3 Modem and the Ktoonsez KT747 Kernel Overclocked to 2106 Mhz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u9hkv1dozz2fryx/Screenshot_2012-12-17-16-07-56.png
stock unrooted on the jellybean ota update.
6390, getting 6000+ consistently now!
Any running geek bench? I'd like to see those too
chitman17 said:
Synergy ROM and l535VRBLK3 Modem and the Ktoonsez KT747 Kernel Overclocked to 2106 Mhz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u9hkv1dozz2fryx/Screenshot_2012-12-17-16-07-56.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not too impressive for that kind of OC is it? I'm getting 6082 with a completely stock ROM.
I can try it out if you are really interested and post it
The thing with benchmark tests is consistency. Whether it's a PC or a phone, run your benchmark tests under the same conditions or else you'll get unpredictable results. Me, I shut down the phone, pull the battery, reinstall, boot... then wait a few minutes for everything to settle down... then run the test. Background processes will effect your results.
Other than bragging rights, benchmark absolute numbers mean little. They ARE helpful to see what individual changes do...especially helpful after an update or after flashing a new ROM. And use several tests. I have Quadrant Standard, AnTuTu, NenaMark 1 and 2, and Linpack. Also, SunSpider is a great JavaScript test that runs in your browser...meaning you can compare devices running Android, WebOS, iOS, WinX...or even RIM if you're one of the dozen or so people who still use a Blackberry. Lower numbers are better, since the score is in milliseconds to complete the tests.
http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html
Related
Thought I would start a thread, where people can see how their MT4G stacks up against others. People can post their benchmarks and say what ROM they are running, where they have their processor clocked, etc....
Anyways, I attached my screens, I am running cm7... the benchmark test I just ran, was clocked at like 1.4GHz on cm7.
The quadrant is back when I was running an alpha, clocked at 1.2GHz
Best Quadrant Score seen so far: Unknown(Looks like CM7)
Best LinPack: Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Best SmartBench: Cm7, OC at 1.3ghz
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
jriv said:
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I see...haha nice. Too bad it was freezing up
Ya I knew it wasn't gonna be stable just wanted to see if I could crack the top 10
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is nice for factory..if it truly is non hacked...very nice.
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive with factory MT4G. I get 1700-1800.
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
bobsbbq said:
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, but I thought benchmark 2011 or whatever the name is, was accepted as a more accurate marker..?
EDIT: SmartBench 2010 is what app I am talking about.
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
My phone is a taiwan version, with a good screen.
do you run quadrant back to back to get 1700-1800?
you should always toss the 1st one, as the processor isn't running at full speed ( at least i don't think so) because all tests after the initial one are always higher.
but the 2060 was my 2nd test after installing the app.
and too, that was like the only app i had installed at the time.
Hahah
brianphanz0r said:
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MT4G running Gingerbread
No freezing here. O/C @1.7
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
I'm running CM 6.1.2 RC2 w/ Grankin's kernel.
Best Quadrant score I've got so far when overclocked to 1.8Ghz is 3114.
It runs stable but sucks the life out of the battery.
For every day use, I have it on 1.2Ghz.
I can't link to the outside since this is my 1st post... (there goes the cherry)
Here's a screenie anyway:
pacstudios.com/snap20110120_164921.png
Jaskwith said:
Best Quadrant Score seen so far:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10719358&postcount=14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 3100 with cm a few times.
Running CM6.1.2RC2
Over Clocked to 1.5Ghrz
Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
quadrant score
my quadrant score : )
I'm getting 2390 on quadrant with my phone oc'd to 1.4ghz and running the latest version of Iced Glacier ROM. Zero freezing/reboots/lockups and decent battery life, decent battery life even with wifi/bluetooth/gps turned on and connected.
i'm running the bionix 2 rom and the compatible ext4 kernel, but when I benchmark it on smartbench 2011, It seems like only 1 core is being used because I get a 1300-1500 productivity score. I flash back to stock, stock bionix, or stock EB and the scores go back to normal (around 3000 productivity). What is going on?
maybe u got a bad download? when dl kernel?
sarni84 said:
maybe u got a bad download? when dl kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded it last night, then redownloaded today, same problem. I actually got normal scores like twice in the beginning, but after that it just seems like only 1 core is being used.
Clear cache and dalvik cache in clockwork and see if that helps
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
aim1126 said:
Clear cache and dalvik cache in clockwork and see if that helps
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also did that each time. I don't think it's just me. People are running quadrant and getting much higher scores(including me). But if you look at the scores for each individual category. You will notice that the only thing that is higher is the I/O due to ext4. the I/O score is so heavily inflated, that the overall quadrant score goes up while some other things are going down. I don't know why everyone relies so heavily on quadrant but it's so inaccurate.
xdmds said:
also did that each time. I don't think it's just me. People are running quadrant and getting much higher scores(including me). But if you look at the scores for each individual category. You will notice that the only thing that is higher is the I/O due to ext4. the I/O score is so heavily inflated, that the overall quadrant score goes up while some other things are going down. I don't know why everyone relies so heavily on quadrant but it's so inaccurate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True that. I hate it when websites run quadrant in their reviews. Specially when the app hasn't even been updated for dual core phones
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
I have a question about this kernel, i have it installed on the phone and flashed on it, it said in the post from nemesis2all that there was a Battery hack, i was curious how to use it, i currently have settings at Min=400 max=1300 all settings undervolted 50mV, how good are these settings? and would this be the optimal settings for performance and battery life? or anyone have a better setup that would help. seem to be getting high 1700 quadrant scores with how it is now.
In order to get the best battery life you would not want your phone over clocked, I run otb kernel as well and just uv the stock setting starting at 50 for the 1000, and progressively stepping down to negative 100. Anyways I run, 1000 -50, 800 and 600 -75, 400 200 & 100 at -100 and I have great battery life even with heavy usage and playing memory intensive games, paradise island, drag racing, pocket soccer. Unless your phone is laggy after you enable lagfix I think overclocking is probably just killing your battery faster the only roms I used light oc' ing for was phoenix and miuiwiz, where both launchers seemed to get some lag after a long days use
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
The other school of thought on battery life is, if you overclock the processor, it will finish the task faster and return to a lower power idle state sooner.
well also i used SuperOneClick to root the phone, is rageagainstthecage a good root to use? or are there better ones out there? also sometimes this kernel like to freeze at start up and i have to re flash it. im pretty sure this isnt supposed to happen. any help or advise is greatly appreciated
I've had issues with OTB kernals before. Your problem could be the kernel, but I see you oc'd it to 1300. That too could be causing it. Each phone reacts differently to kernels and oc/uv.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Are we able to still use any touchwiz kernal from ec10 on the new heintz 57 ee19 updated rom?
Well I re-flashed it and used same ovetclock just lower volts and am pulling a average 2100 quadrant score. Don't know if it means much but no lock ups anymore
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
This could just be my stupidity, but if you can flash kernels then you have a custom recovery, right? What's the point of using super one click? Wouldn't having the recovery and the ability to change kernels, etc mean your already rooted? Just seems redundant, I never used a rooting app and still use all the root only apps....
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
evilntention said:
This could just be my stupidity, but if you can flash kernels then you have a custom recovery, right? What's the point of using super one click? Wouldn't having the recovery and the ability to change kernels, etc mean your already rooted? Just seems redundant, I never used a rooting app and still use all the root only apps....
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda. The only way to flash a kernel is with a custom recovery but you don't necessarily have to be rooted to do that. EE19 is not rooted so that's why you need SOC if you want to root. Rooting opens up a lot of options for apps and moving and copying system files but isn't required for Roms/Kernels.
Anyone have any other general good ideas or cool tricks to do to this phone?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Currently, im doing a bit of testing with the new phoenix 1.1 rom.
This baby can handle some crazy undervolting.
Currently:
1000 : -100
800 : - 100
600: -100
400: -100
200: -150
Going to see what i can get this down to...a bit more tweaking i bet the battery life can get phenomenal.
Try opening and closing the camera a few times in a row and see if it freezes. Or try a quad test, those are usually the things that will cause issues with too much under volting.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
akellar said:
Try opening and closing the camera a few times in a row and see if it freezes. Or try a quad test, those are usually the things that will cause issues with too much under volting.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already ahead of you. Up to:
1000 : -100
800 : - 100
600: -100
400: -150
200: -175
Usually ill run 4 quadrant tests and if it passes that it should be stable. Currently ran a 2187 is that a good score for 1.4ghz?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
also when using the OTB kernal what are safe settings to use? ive been running it at 1400Mhz but it lockes up and geeps giving me force close things on start up and never stops and i have to reflash to stock and start over? im assuming this isnt typical, can any one help out?
Actually that's probably pretty typical for an OC that high. I know I can't run it that high without lockups. From what I see in the original thread, most people don't run above 1300 most of the time.
Sooo, what is the fastest Skyrocket rom according to benchmarks currently..? I've been curious.. I see top Antutu scores of 7800ish! and I'm super interested as to how that was obtained. OC'ing has always been a hobby of mine with computers so...
I've tried many roms so far. In my experience, I've gotten the best benchmarks from Sky ICS, Sky Coke, and QuikWiz. All of which I used Faux's kernal, rockin' Antutu scores between 7000 and 7260.
What is everyone else running when y'all get your top scores?
Sent from my secret hideout
Im currently running skyice stock. I did get like 7900 antutu with the skyspeed but battery life is my main goal.
Everything runs nice and fluid on my phone. Of course, I believe in usability and actual performance than silly benchmarking numbers
madmax49201 how in the world did you manage to get 7900 in Antutu?
Sent from my secret hideout
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1411198
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
Never gotten more than 7400 on various Tom's.
7300 is average best.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
I haven't tried antutu yet, but I've gotten 4077 in Quadrant.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
too slow for you to know that there are few threads already out there
No flaming just joke if you can't take it than idk
I average 7100-7200 on sky ice with faux, but have gotten 7500+ on da_g kernel.
here are my download and upload speeds running stock skyicecream no faux no overclock would get the same speeds overclocked well i did. hope this helps
Hmm interesting responses. I'd be inclined to try Da G's kernel with Antutu but everytime I OC over 1.72 GHz or so everything crashes. Faux's kernel has been quite stable for me on the other hand...
Sent from my secret hideout
My phone can oc to 1.83 on da_g's kernel. Fastest antutu I've gotten is 7398 with TPCv3 and da_g's kernel.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Antutu Score
Im using TPC v3 with Da_G's kernel and this is what i got.
Hey guys
I just installed Codename Android 1.5.5 + Matr1x Kernel 18.0 after using CM9 nightly 0304 + Matr1x Kernel 17.5 for a while. I used to run CNA 1.4 but stopped using that as it got very slow after a few hours.
The Quadrant score I was getting on CM9+Matr1x 17.5 was around 2000 with no overclock. Now that I am running CNA 1.5.5 + Matr1x 18.0 i'm only getting a score around 1100...
The ROM feels fine and snappy, but this low score worries me. Is this normal or does this maybe mean there's a problem somewhere?
Thanks!
I'm on same rom same kernel and overclocked to 1430 and only getting 1400s
Ok, so I guess this is normal...
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
I am running 1.5.5, with Air Kernel 3.6, scary governor and overclocked to 1400, I scored around 2600 with this set up on Quadrant.
I tested the rom after flashing it and it scored it at 1100.
Oh I applied the BM tweaks from CNA utility as well
I am waiting to see how the ram holds up, 1.40 would drain after a few hours, as how the battery lasts, so far it is looking good on both of those items.
I haven't tried to many roms, I liked this one as son as I loaded it, loads all my apps from the market, seems very stable even with it overclocked.
I have read that Gingerbread is really stable and fast but I don't want to loose my native music.flac support on this rom. I have read that 4.04 and 4.05 will have better battery, I am hoping so, as I don't want to go backward to Gingerbread unless I have to.
I applied brain masters tweaks and went from around 1100 to 1800 with no overclock and the rom feels much better now. Now I'll just have to see about battery life but I'm a happy man at the moment
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
You are absolutely right. I use the benchmark simply to measure how the rom is before I get a good feel for it. In this case it feels much better after the tweaks.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep .. +1 to that
Clean install using BM rom wipe + Air 3.6 + BM tweaks from CNA1.4 + Deep idle patch for 1.5.5
Deadline + ondemand 100 - 800 with Up Threshold @ 95%.
After 16hrs I've got 68% battery left
Q score between 2000 & 2100 when set to 1000MHz
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree to this.. I rely on the feel of the ROM when I use them..
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FULL ACK...!
I'm still using 1.4.0 with Air Kernel 3.6 and the supercharger script. I have insanely good performance though battery life has taken a hit over the last few days.
I would like to install BM's tweaks though I'm not sure which version goes with this particular ROM.
If you want higher Quadrant scores try the Trinity T144 kernels. But Quadrant Standard says nothing about the performance of the ROM.. it's just a score.
Yeah, quadrant score isn't everything. The ROM feels fine now but I'm getting the occational freeze requiring a battery pull. I've been running with no overclock but at the moment am running 100/1300 Lulzactive with no issues so far.
Battery life is not good though. I'm at about 50% after 7 hours on battery with light usage