Thought I would start a thread, where people can see how their MT4G stacks up against others. People can post their benchmarks and say what ROM they are running, where they have their processor clocked, etc....
Anyways, I attached my screens, I am running cm7... the benchmark test I just ran, was clocked at like 1.4GHz on cm7.
The quadrant is back when I was running an alpha, clocked at 1.2GHz
Best Quadrant Score seen so far: Unknown(Looks like CM7)
Best LinPack: Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Best SmartBench: Cm7, OC at 1.3ghz
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
jriv said:
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I see...haha nice. Too bad it was freezing up
Ya I knew it wasn't gonna be stable just wanted to see if I could crack the top 10
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is nice for factory..if it truly is non hacked...very nice.
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive with factory MT4G. I get 1700-1800.
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
bobsbbq said:
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, but I thought benchmark 2011 or whatever the name is, was accepted as a more accurate marker..?
EDIT: SmartBench 2010 is what app I am talking about.
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
My phone is a taiwan version, with a good screen.
do you run quadrant back to back to get 1700-1800?
you should always toss the 1st one, as the processor isn't running at full speed ( at least i don't think so) because all tests after the initial one are always higher.
but the 2060 was my 2nd test after installing the app.
and too, that was like the only app i had installed at the time.
Hahah
brianphanz0r said:
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MT4G running Gingerbread
No freezing here. O/C @1.7
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
I'm running CM 6.1.2 RC2 w/ Grankin's kernel.
Best Quadrant score I've got so far when overclocked to 1.8Ghz is 3114.
It runs stable but sucks the life out of the battery.
For every day use, I have it on 1.2Ghz.
I can't link to the outside since this is my 1st post... (there goes the cherry)
Here's a screenie anyway:
pacstudios.com/snap20110120_164921.png
Jaskwith said:
Best Quadrant Score seen so far:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10719358&postcount=14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 3100 with cm a few times.
Running CM6.1.2RC2
Over Clocked to 1.5Ghrz
Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
quadrant score
my quadrant score : )
I'm getting 2390 on quadrant with my phone oc'd to 1.4ghz and running the latest version of Iced Glacier ROM. Zero freezing/reboots/lockups and decent battery life, decent battery life even with wifi/bluetooth/gps turned on and connected.
Related
quadrant standard
whats your quadrant score?
my highest is 1572, usually 1525 or so
i've noticed i run it 3 times in a row and fastest 3rd or 4th time for some reason. Stock rom and kernel. Rooted and deleted a lot of crap.
trsix said:
quadrant standard
whats your quadrant score?
my highest is 1572, usually 1525 or so
i've noticed i run it 3 times in a row and fastest 3rd or 4th time for some reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All depends on what ROM and kernel your using. I've seen mine hit as high as 3200 and as low as 1000.
Sent from Gingerbread Speedy 4G
Highest mine hit was around 3200.. As of right now I hit around 2400... I'm on cm7 179 with PershootV8
Sent from my Shifty Speedy using the XDA Premium App
Yeah I'm on cyclonic and hit 2600 oc'ed to 2ghz.
Idk how people hit 4000 give or take.
Highest I went was about 3600 with evervolv and x99 kernel.
Shifted from my Evo.
Enraged21 said:
Yeah I'm on cyclonic and hit 2600 oc'ed to 2ghz.
Idk how people hit 4000 give or take.
Highest I went was about 3600 with evervolv and x99 kernel.
Shifted from my Evo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Evervolv messed my phone up.. Lol... My phone doesn't like that rom... But yeah, a lot of tweaking and playing with settings on the right rom will get that for you
Sent from my Shifty Speedy using the XDA Premium App
Enraged21 said:
Yeah I'm on cyclonic and hit 2600 oc'ed to 2ghz.
Idk how people hit 4000 give or take.
Highest I went was about 3600 with evervolv and x99 kernel.
Shifted from my Evo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I've never hit 4000 either and my highest was around 3200 OC'd to 1.8ghz (my phone isn't stable if I go any higher).
Sent from my PG06100 using xda premium
Enraged21 said:
Yeah I'm on cyclonic and hit 2600 oc'ed to 2ghz.
Idk how people hit 4000 give or take.
Highest I went was about 3600 with evervolv and x99 kernel.
Shifted from my Evo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you manage that with Evervolv. i have that plus the x99 kernal and i went from 1500 up to 1700.... i got shafted lol. yes im still a semi noob to some of this.
3200 using scaryghoul #27 kernel ocd at1.8 running miui was my highest. Currently running cyclonic with built in pershoot ocd to 1.7 and I'm hitting 2600 consecutively. Set to 1 gig I hit 2200 everytime. If I push it to 2 gigs I hit between 2800-2900
sent from my CYCLONIC SHIFTed DEMON using the awesome XDA app.
kyhassen said:
How did you manage that with Evervolv. i have that plus the x99 kernal and i went from 1500 up to 1700.... i got shafted lol. yes im still a semi noob to some of this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know how but evervolv at one point was my daily for about 4 months.. idk if that has anything to do with it.
Also I was using global quadrant rank. Now I use quadrant standard.
Shifted from my Evo.
I use stock ROM. It shows 1290.
Hello everyone. I have had my Nexus S 4G for about 2 weeks now, and I have tried everything I can think of. However, I cannot overclock my phone higher than 1.2GHz. If I set it to 1.44GHz (or even 1.3GHz in most kernels), within the first five minutes, it locks up, requiring a battery pull. I have tried just about every kernel. Trinity, Netarchy, Matr1x, everything. However, I get the same result. I am assuming that it is just my phone. I know that when I had my Evo, it didn't want to OC past 1.1 GHz stably, but the refurb I got from Sprint ran at 1.21 GHz like a champ. I was just wondering if anyone had the same issue, and if so, if it was possible to alleviate this problem. I would love to run my Nexus at 1.44 GHz, because some of the Quadrant scores look amazing.
Thanks again for reading,
StompySan
Try v9.0 of matrix and set it to 1.3
Lemme know plz
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
Try v9.0 of matrix and set it to 1.3
Lemme know plz
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After running Quadrant twice with it set at 1.3, I got a lockup. 100% not responsive. Had to pull battery.
EDIT: I tried benchmarking my phone with CF-Bench, thinking maybe it could have been a fluke with Quadrant, and had the exact same results. At 1.3 and 1.46GHz.
1.2??
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
1??
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Ok if neither of those work I need you to do 2 things.
1. Raise all voltages by 30
2. Set it to 1.2 ghz
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
I can overclock without reboots to 1.2. Any higher than that is when the problem arises.
Ok now once you flash v9.0, go into setcpu and raise all voltages by 30
Now try 1.3
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
Ok now once you flash v9.0, go into setcpu and raise all voltages by 30
Now try 1.3
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you say all voltages, you mean even the ones that it already runs stably on?
No no, just the unstable ones
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
OK, so Quadrant ran fine for 5 tests, and CF-Bench ran OK as well. Should I push it up to 1.46 now?
Try it, and if you get a reboot, raise voltage for 1.46 by 10.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
No lockups yet! I have ran Quadrant 5 times, CF-Bench 2 times, and Linpack a couple times. Seems to be doing great! I am going to test it more thoroughly tomorrow (it's almost 1AM where I live, lol), but it seems great right now!
I have never increased the voltages on a phone CPU before. I have done it on my brother's computer when I overclocked his processor, but I generally try to avoid it. I am just really paranoid to mess with the amount of power going through the processor. That's why I turned to the professionals in this case. Thanks again for your extremely quick reply.
Cool! you just needed a bit of a voltage push, that's all
let's hope 1.46 ghz runs well
Mathkid Ive never been stable past 1.3 so I followed what you told him to do and what do you know! Perfectly stable so far at 1.44 on apocalypse kernel!! Might have to try your 9.0 at 1.46 soon!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
So is there a limit to how far one should overvolt? I upped the voltage at 1440 mhz to 1550 mV. Did run rather stable except for "Lets golf HD!" which froze. I would really like to be able to run at 1440, but not sure what to do. Im using Apocalypse Talon 3.2.1.
Do you think your kernel would handle OCing better, mathkid?
Yeah you can try it out and if you need to raise voltages go ahead
hey guys i just need a little bit help here.
im new to the sensation
and i am running Bulletproof 2.2.1
and its very slow, and i even get a ****ty score on quadrant
and i see there are several kernals out there and i wanted to know witch ones are compatible with sense 3.5 bulletproof
and witch one is the best one. by best i mean faster overclocked
thanks in advance
You can try Faux or Bricked, both are great.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Faux 0.2.3 is out soon with a whole host of new features, I've found that I can't get Faux 1.89Ghz version to work (boot loops) but it may work for you. Due to this I use Bricked kernel and then I can overclock (if I want to) up to 1.72Ghz which seems to be the max for my chip!
Here's a really good kernel 2.6.35.14-Bricked-v 1.2-gpuoc 320-ondmnd [email protected] #6 this is what I use and It's awesome so far I've been useing this kernel for three days and It's lighting fast
I'm on BP also and while quadrant is low with stock, I've found stock kernel to be smooth and stable. Today I did flash bricked 1.4, and while my CF scores and quadrant went up significanty, I had lag on homescreens and games like asphalt 6 hd. I have no idea what the problem was. It could have been my Rom, or the way I flashed bricked kernel because I have read so many positives with using bricked.
I went back to stock kernel and all is smooth again, but with low benchmarking scores....
So I guess I'm saying take benchmark scores with a grain of salt. Although it would be nice to have my cake and it too.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
whats you quadrant score? i flashed that kernal but i had problems with 3D and he said he fixed it on the latest version 1.4. and when i used setcpu my phone kept rebooting
I don't remember my quadrant score, but CF bench score was really high with bricked 1.4, above GS2.
Now back to stock kernel my CF bench is back to around 5000. Just under the atrix scores.
(But with stock I have no issues with with gameloft games, no lag in asphalt 6 hd.)
I will probably try again in the near future as it could have been user error on my part.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
Fk quadrant scores! It all depends on how ur phone is running
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
g1user101 said:
Fk quadrant scores! It all depends on how ur phone is running
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree!
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using Tapatalk
gustav30 said:
I don't remember my quadrant score, but CF bench score was really high with bricked 1.4, above GS2.
Now back to stock kernel my CF bench is back to around 5000. Just under the atrix scores.
(But with stock I have no issues with with gameloft games, no lag in asphalt 6 hd.)
I will probably try again in the near future as it could have been user error on my part.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
talking about games i havent be able to play them on any rom. some says its not supported and somes dont have the 3d graphics on them
Do the current kernels all have these problems? I would like to know this before I get this phone. And I noticed someone OC'd to 1.8GHz, is this to fix lag or just for fun? Such OC would lead me to question the Sensation's speed quite a bit. Sorry for hijacking the thread, didn't want to make a new one.
Do the current kernels all have these problems? I would like to know this before I get this phone. And I noticed someone OC'd to 1.8GHz, is this to fix lag or just for fun? Such OC would lead me to question the Sensation's speed quite a bit. Sorry for hijacking the thread, didn't want to make a new one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running CM7 SelfKang9, with Faux's AOSP 0.2 Kenrnel (1.78ghz OC) and undervolt (Thermal Patch). Everything is smooth as butter and battery life is beyond excellent (getting avg 6mA idle). If you're interested in benchmarks, I have gotten as high as a 6499 AnTuTu score, and a 7424 in CF bench. It does run fine at its rated speed of 1.5ghz, I'm just always gunning for that extra speed.
Edit: For Comparison, my friend has an Atrix, using CM 7.1 and Faux with a 1.3 ghz OC, and he was getting slightly slower benches (6000 AnTuTu). Although both phones run great.
I'm using pyramid3d 8.0.1 along with the bricked 1.2 kernel.
Runs perfect. No lags, and no other problems, although quadrant scores are really low. Quadrant really means nothing IMO.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
pardoned said:
I'm using pyramid3d 8.0.1 along with the bricked 1.2 kernel.
Runs perfect. No lags, and no other problems, although quadrant scores are really low. Quadrant really means nothing IMO.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense has a nice bug from HTC that affects Quad & other benches negatively, this can be fixed by using AOSP/CM/MIUI, I noticed this on my previous phones. I think HTC has some lingering debugging enabled in Sense.
Louer Adun said:
I am running CM7 SelfKang9, with Faux's AOSP 0.2 Kenrnel (1.78ghz OC) and undervolt (Thermal Patch). Everything is smooth as butter and battery life is beyond excellent (getting avg 6mA idle). If you're interested in benchmarks, I have gotten as high as a 6499 AnTuTu score, and a 7424 in CF bench. It does run fine at its rated speed of 1.5ghz, I'm just always gunning for that extra speed.
Edit: For Comparison, my friend has an Atrix, using CM 7.1 and Faux with a 1.3 ghz OC, and he was getting slightly slower benches (6000 AnTuTu). Although both phones run great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for clearing things up for me, I was worried that the phone had speed issues and the OC was to fix that, now I'm not worried with that anymore. Hopefully I order mines next week, but I plan on undervolting & underclocking, just as I did on my MT4G. Although you benches have restored my confidence in the phone.
Hey guys
I just installed Codename Android 1.5.5 + Matr1x Kernel 18.0 after using CM9 nightly 0304 + Matr1x Kernel 17.5 for a while. I used to run CNA 1.4 but stopped using that as it got very slow after a few hours.
The Quadrant score I was getting on CM9+Matr1x 17.5 was around 2000 with no overclock. Now that I am running CNA 1.5.5 + Matr1x 18.0 i'm only getting a score around 1100...
The ROM feels fine and snappy, but this low score worries me. Is this normal or does this maybe mean there's a problem somewhere?
Thanks!
I'm on same rom same kernel and overclocked to 1430 and only getting 1400s
Ok, so I guess this is normal...
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
I am running 1.5.5, with Air Kernel 3.6, scary governor and overclocked to 1400, I scored around 2600 with this set up on Quadrant.
I tested the rom after flashing it and it scored it at 1100.
Oh I applied the BM tweaks from CNA utility as well
I am waiting to see how the ram holds up, 1.40 would drain after a few hours, as how the battery lasts, so far it is looking good on both of those items.
I haven't tried to many roms, I liked this one as son as I loaded it, loads all my apps from the market, seems very stable even with it overclocked.
I have read that Gingerbread is really stable and fast but I don't want to loose my native music.flac support on this rom. I have read that 4.04 and 4.05 will have better battery, I am hoping so, as I don't want to go backward to Gingerbread unless I have to.
I applied brain masters tweaks and went from around 1100 to 1800 with no overclock and the rom feels much better now. Now I'll just have to see about battery life but I'm a happy man at the moment
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
You are absolutely right. I use the benchmark simply to measure how the rom is before I get a good feel for it. In this case it feels much better after the tweaks.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep .. +1 to that
Clean install using BM rom wipe + Air 3.6 + BM tweaks from CNA1.4 + Deep idle patch for 1.5.5
Deadline + ondemand 100 - 800 with Up Threshold @ 95%.
After 16hrs I've got 68% battery left
Q score between 2000 & 2100 when set to 1000MHz
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree to this.. I rely on the feel of the ROM when I use them..
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FULL ACK...!
I'm still using 1.4.0 with Air Kernel 3.6 and the supercharger script. I have insanely good performance though battery life has taken a hit over the last few days.
I would like to install BM's tweaks though I'm not sure which version goes with this particular ROM.
If you want higher Quadrant scores try the Trinity T144 kernels. But Quadrant Standard says nothing about the performance of the ROM.. it's just a score.
Yeah, quadrant score isn't everything. The ROM feels fine now but I'm getting the occational freeze requiring a battery pull. I've been running with no overclock but at the moment am running 100/1300 Lulzactive with no issues so far.
Battery life is not good though. I'm at about 50% after 7 hours on battery with light usage
Exactly what do these scores mean along with what is the norm? I have CleanRom 5.5.1 w/ LeanKernel 1.2.1.
Stock JB
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
what the scores mean? its running slow?
slufa111 said:
what the scores mean? its running slow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To my understanding it's an estimated test of the processing power/speed of the chipset.
Idk what up with you guys phone but here's mine..
This is stock everything. No root.
Your not that far from me that I should be worried.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
I don't understand how you guys all get such high scores. I've never gone above 4600 on Stock or CM10.......nothing overclocked. Do you guys do some crazy preparation on your phone prior to running tests to get such high scores?
I just flashed the ROM and Kernel and reinstalled all my apps for me...then ran it. If its anything, I kill all apps.
slufa111 said:
I just flashed the ROM and Kernel and reinstalled all my apps for me...then ran it. If its anything, I kill all apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did the same
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Very decent battery life.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Benchmarks are really inconsistent in these programs. As long as you think it's fast on YOUR phone, that's all that counts.
Synergy ROM and l535VRBLK3 Modem and the Ktoonsez KT747 Kernel Overclocked to 2106 Mhz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u9hkv1dozz2fryx/Screenshot_2012-12-17-16-07-56.png
stock unrooted on the jellybean ota update.
6390, getting 6000+ consistently now!
Any running geek bench? I'd like to see those too
chitman17 said:
Synergy ROM and l535VRBLK3 Modem and the Ktoonsez KT747 Kernel Overclocked to 2106 Mhz
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u9hkv1dozz2fryx/Screenshot_2012-12-17-16-07-56.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not too impressive for that kind of OC is it? I'm getting 6082 with a completely stock ROM.
I can try it out if you are really interested and post it
The thing with benchmark tests is consistency. Whether it's a PC or a phone, run your benchmark tests under the same conditions or else you'll get unpredictable results. Me, I shut down the phone, pull the battery, reinstall, boot... then wait a few minutes for everything to settle down... then run the test. Background processes will effect your results.
Other than bragging rights, benchmark absolute numbers mean little. They ARE helpful to see what individual changes do...especially helpful after an update or after flashing a new ROM. And use several tests. I have Quadrant Standard, AnTuTu, NenaMark 1 and 2, and Linpack. Also, SunSpider is a great JavaScript test that runs in your browser...meaning you can compare devices running Android, WebOS, iOS, WinX...or even RIM if you're one of the dozen or so people who still use a Blackberry. Lower numbers are better, since the score is in milliseconds to complete the tests.
http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html