Related
Hi
when i run Quadrant on my new One S i only score about 3500, but when i look at reviews they score about 5000? how much do you get?
Edit: Ok i did a restart and now i get 4800 istead.. strange it had such a big impact on the score
This can be because of background processes.
just tried quadrant on my device and got this nice result :
noble8 said:
This can be because of background processes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well on my first run before the restart i only scored 3000 then i closed all the apps i had running and tried again resulting in 3500.
svejstrup said:
Well on my first run before the restart i only scored 3000 then i closed all the apps i had running and tried again resulting in 3500.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats strange i got my score without closing apps
and just another strange thing, quadrant says that my phone contains the msm8960 chipset.. but the one s is supposed to have the MSM8260A right?
wayne850 said:
just tried quadrant on my device and got this nice result :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW that's fantastic!
Can you guys try vellamo? I am interested to see how much it gets in the sunspider and ocean flinger tests.
There you go
/edit: And btw, there is my Quadrant score, if anyone wants to compare.
nativestranger said:
Can you guys try vellamo? I am interested to see how much it gets in the sunspider and ocean flinger tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sunspider vallamo ~1500, Sunspider browser~1700, flinger tests are all maxed out at 60 fps with 0 framedrops
Quadrant reports 5022 for me, 2410 for velamo (overall score)
svejstrup said:
and just another strange thing, quadrant says that my phone contains the msm8960 chipset.. but the one s is supposed to have the MSM8260A right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Yeap, that's odd... maybe because they are in the same series? Who knows
donverse said:
There you go
/edit: And btw, there is my Quadrant score, if anyone wants to compare.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
svejstrup said:
Sunspider vallamo ~1500, Sunspider browser~1700, flinger tests are all maxed out at 60 fps with 0 framedrops
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Is it possible to playback 1080p flash videos smoothly on youtube desktop webpage?
Quadrant is nerfed and isn't 100% correct.
As you can read from the title this thread is about benchmarks results,and decided to open this topic because is very hard to find them in this forum.
So far i,ve seen very different result with this device ,even two devices with the same firmware and no tweaks installed sometimes give a `very different result.
Also people were complaining for bad performance with the 9.4.5.22 firmware and is now happy and is getting better results with 9.4.5.26.
Well,in my case was the other way around,i`ve bought this device with 9.4.5.22 preinstalled and my benchmarks results were better than now with 9.4.5.26 (Antutu was 13.348 and now is 11562) so i wonder why so different results,this devices all have the same hardware.
Anyway,lets try to keep this topic clean and use some guidelines for posting the results,something like this:
Firmware ->> 9.4.5.26 stock or custom roms
CPU mode ->> balanced or performance
Antutu ->> your score
Specify if you are using any tweak
Offcourse you can post any benchmark you want,not only Antutu.Happy benchmarking
Inviato dal mio ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T con Tapatalk 2
These are my stock results after update.. I/O is flying. I'm downloading a torrent at the moment and I am not having any slow downs at all love my tablet
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using XDA Premium HD app
.26 stock (rooted), tweaks from my thread (see the signature)
balanced & interactive governor = 12431 in AnTuTu
performance & performance governor = 13558 / 13735 in AnTuTu
It's normal that the results will vary based on many factors, but they shouldn't vary TOO MUCH (>10%?).
You can also see some of my RL Benchmark (SQLite performance) results on .26 here.
Signature: Going to butthurt ban me? Well go ahead.
Do a cold boot after .26 update
Before a cold boot AnTuTu showed IO at 4xx in Balanced, forgot to test in Performance; I am using "x" for the numbers I do not remember
After a cold boot:
Balanced:
IO is 811, total is 12501
Performance:
IO 822, total is 13517
Not tweaked, not rooted, not unlocked
while being at .21 at the Performance mode IO was 64x and the total was 1350x
while being at .22 at the Performance mode total was 1310x
So looks like .22 was a bit slower than .21 but .26 is better than both at least at IO
jdeoxys said:
Signature: Going to butthurt ban me? Well go ahead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your benchmarks are the first I have seen beat the HTC and the prime.
For some reason, I keep thinking from all the benchies I have seen over the past week, those two have beat the infinity.
I might be wrong though (usually am).
Anyways, very cool.
.26 Stock
Performance
lardo5150 said:
Your benchmarks are the first I have seen beat the HTC and the prime.
For some reason, I keep thinking from all the benchies I have seen over the past week, those two have beat the infinity.
I might be wrong though (usually am).
Anyways, very cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Btw, all these were balanced mode.
Signature: Going to butthurt ban me? Well go ahead.
jdeoxys said:
Btw, all these were balanced mode.
Signature: Going to butthurt ban me? Well go ahead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're IO is WAY higher than mine on quadrant. Are you using any build.prop tweaks?
gottahavit said:
You're IO is WAY higher than mine on quadrant. Are you using any build.prop tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None but the SIO (or was it CFQ, I can't remember) governor.
jdeoxys said:
None but the SIO (or was it CFQ, I can't remember) governor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's very odd, curious to see others. Sio isn't available without tweaks so i'm guessing its cfq which is now the default. But my numbers match yours except you aio is much higher.
gottahavit said:
That's very odd, curious to see others. Sio isn't available without tweaks so i'm guessing its cfq which is now the default. But my numbers match yours except you aio is much higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you guys post your detailed results from Antutu? I was getting around 13k, but at the moment I'm scoring under 8k. I'm thinking the difference is mostly in the CPU benchmark results since those constitute the highest numbers in the overall score, but it would be nice to be able to compare each area and narrow it down.
Wish AnTuTu would get the update out allowing proper path to SD card.
It's scores don't reflect my card but the internal storage...
Here is my score:
And
Pretoriano80 said:
So far i,ve seen very different result with this device ,even two devices with the same firmware and no tweaks installed sometimes give a `very different result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is nothing of a surprise and the reason why comparing results is pretty much useless.
You can take results as an indicator for problems with your own device (if you have very bad results).
But they are not sufficient to compare with other android devices, not even with other infinity devices.
I have tried some of the benchmarks. Non told me what driver features it used. They did not even mention if they use the multi-core.
Also they do not check what performance mode is set, probably they will never be able to do this. Also users here usually do not mention it.
You can not be sure what apps and tasks run in the background. Does the sql test disable caching?
What firmware version is installed? Do they have the same hardware?
I feel I could go on forever with this.
There are just too many factors you can not control...
jdeoxys said:
None but the SIO (or was it CFQ, I can't remember) governor.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are I/O schedulers, not CPU governors, a totally different thing.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app
Benchmark after cold boot
Firmware --> stock 9.4.5.26 - rooted - everything default
Governor -- > interactive
CPU mode --> balanced
RL Benchmark --> first run =58 second run = 74 third run = 68
AnTuTu --> 12514 (CPU=7670,GPU=1318,RAM=2848,I/O=678) first run
12634 (CPU=7649,GPU=1319,RAM=2920,I/O=746) second run
12497 (CPU=4766,GPU=1314,RAM=2913,I/O=804) third run
BTW,i don't worry too much about the benchmarks results and i believe that real life user experience is more accurate.
GLBenchmark was updated to version 2.5, the new HD test is pure torture for current devices. Luckily the T33 chip is still on top for most of them
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6121/glbenchmark-25-performance/1
Read it and weep..
HAHAHAHA
Do you know what hte results were before the update?
Would like to see some other sunspiddr score thanks
Tf700t
Android 4.1.1
Stock everything
971ms-980'SMS
Today 1347.1 stock jb; I once got as high as 1200ish
That was with Dolphin Beta - just ran stock browser and got 977.3 and 971.0
If only stock would run in fullscreen without having to use the lab swipe thing, which is way too fiddly for my thumbs.
dgjl said:
Today 1347.1 stock jb; I once got as high as 1200ish
That was with Dolphin Beta - just ran stock browser and got 977.3 and 971.0
If only stock would run in fullscreen without having to use the lab swipe thing, which is way too fiddly for my thumbs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I'm getting on chrome, why does the stock browser run so much better? It also scores much higher in browser mark than chrome or dolphin, not complaining at all luvs the speed wanna use chrome
Stock browser with Browser2Ram installed: 1010ms
Boat browser: 984ms
Dolphin Beta: 1367ms
Cleanrom 1.1
860 ms
ISHYGDDT from my FHD tablet.
flyfishing said:
Stock browser with Browser2Ram installed: 1010ms
Boat browser: 984ms
Dolphin Beta: 1367ms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can't find it in the playstore (sunspider). It's free, right? Does anyone have a copy to sideload?
okantomi said:
i can't find it in the playstore (sunspider). It's free, right? Does anyone have a copy to sideload?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sunspider is online test. http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html
HoushaSen said:
Sunspider is online test. http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for posting that link.
My best score in performance mode was 873, and in balanced mode, I got 967.
CleanROM v1.3, browser2ram and stock browser.
What would be considered a good score for an android tablet?
CleanRom 1.3 803ms w/out Browser2Ram (I think Scott disabled nand caching on the browser).
920 HT On @ 4.2GHz 638ms
Stock JB (factory reset after update), stock browser w/o browser to ram, performance mode got 892.2 +/- 1.2% on first and only run.
okantomi said:
Thanks for posting that link.
My best score in performance mode was 873, and in balanced mode, I got 967.
CleanROM v1.3, browser2ram and stock browser.
What would be considered a good score for an android tablet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pre jb i believe tf700 had something like 1600-1800. New ipad i remember reading 1500 or so. Then galaxy note10.1 had 1300s. But these were stock. I remember getting 1300 on tf700 with boat. In any event,for tablets i believe below 1000 may be one of the top if not top. But again its just benchmark because whether you have browser2ram or not, i thought numbers are the same sonot refecting user experience completely
875 stock/performance mode; 850 boat/performance
These are off the chart for tablet. Ipad 3 is 1450; iPhone 5 950. But what does any of it mean?
dgjl said:
875 stock/performance mode; 850 boat/performance
These are off the chart for tablet. Ipad 3 is 1450; iPhone 5 950. But what does any of it mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing really, couple major variables like internet speed, internet congestion, distance between your location and the test servers etc.. Just a rough idea for references.
Ninja, the test has nothing to do with connection speed. It measures javascript performance, how fast a browser/system combo will render javascript.
buhohitr said:
Nothing really, couple major variables like internet speed, internet congestion, distance between your location and the test servers etc.. Just a rough idea for references.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just want to point out that, while this is a "web based" test, it actually will not be impacted by any network variables. The JavaScript file with all of the functions defining the tests has already been downloaded to the browser before the test runs. As such, this is just as valid a test of performance as any other benchmarking tool you may chose to use.
dgjl said:
875 stock/performance mode; 850 boat/performance
These are off the chart for tablet. Ipad 3 is 1450; iPhone 5 950. But what does any of it mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As to what it means, before the stock browser tweaks (actually integrated into CleanROM v1.3) my brower experience was ok. My Xoom on EOS Jellybean was quite a bit faster and smoother. Now I have a very fast and fluid browser experience. I really see a major difference. Unfortunately I didn't try this benchmark prior to my current setup, and don't really want to go back to a previous state to test it.
okantomi said:
Unfortunately I didn't try this benchmark prior to my current setup, and don't really want to go back to a previous state to test it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know, with all the people claiming how much faster the stock browser feels on JB (and I'm one of them) that would have been an interesting experiment. This sunspider thing seems to be a real pressure test on the script interpreter... which I do not believe changed much (if at all) between ICS and JB. I wouldn't want to jump to conclusions about what comparative results would mean but I'd be surprised if the JB scores were much, if at all, better than the ICS scores.
GaryParr said:
Just want to point out that, while this is a "web based" test, it actually will not be impacted by any network variables. The JavaScript file with all of the functions defining the tests has already been downloaded to the browser before the test runs. As such, this is just as valid a test of performance as any other benchmarking tool you may chose to use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What i'm saying is a browser score of 1500 on an ipad is still smoother than a score of 1000 on tf700. So what is the conclusion....nothing!
Its smoother in what ? In browsing.i don't thing so. Not while using browser2ram it's not. Loading times just rocks even by pc stantards imho.
Okay so, my tf700 is running CleanRom 2.5.5 Inheritance with the over clocked kernal
and i keep getting scores around 6000 and under
while in performance mode
am i doing something wrong
Tyler27 said:
Okay so, my tf700 is running CleanRom 2.5.5 Inheritance with the over clocked kernal
and i keep getting scores around 6000 and under
while in performance mode
am i doing something wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have gpu 2D rendering turned on?
Found under settings/developer options...
Thats OK said:
Do you have gpu 2D rendering turned on?
Found under settings/developer options...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i enabled it and disabled it
score went up to 6200
now dropped back to 5600
Any other ideas?
Tyler27 said:
Any other ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No idea. Have you tried taking a TBU and (maybe even clean) install 2.6 and 2.6.1 (patch over 2.6)?
PS: what mods did you choose? And how much did you manage to get when in Performance Mode?
Low score... it used to be pretty damn high for the TF700T... times change, I guess
Don't let the benchmarks bother you, tbh.
Tyler27 said:
Any other ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do you want to be with benchmarks?
Are you wanting high numbers or are you good with smooth stable UE?
its well documented, quadrant can be fooled, you can have a custom rom thats built specifically for quadrant and it will bench much higher than other roms but in real use its much slower. Go for smooth and stable. Basically, just use your tablet and if you like where its at dont complain, quadrant is just a number, theres no FEELING behind it. Higher number does not always mean better experience.
6200 with force GPU rendering on is great! How does it feel to use?
Thanks for the responses guys
I was thinking if i wipe it completely and do a clean install it would be better, sounds like a good idea anyway
i was comparing my scores to what everyone else was saying and what it showed in the thread for that rom
i always ran quadrant in performance mode and made sure i had more than 400mb free of ram
i stayed with some default setting on the DPI and launcher, but i chose clemsyns kernal with the GPU at 700
and i left fsync enabled
Some people said it hit 7000
if it doesn't matter i wont worry about it
but i will say my tablet is much quicker then before, i have a few hiccups that i believe are caused by some apps
is it possible that apps in the background can cause the low scores?
Hey all -
I have been a Transformer (and modding) fan since my TF101, and I just leapt from a TF201 to the infinity.
I'm not sure quite what I was expecting, but I surely wasn't expecting it to be slower. Responses to screen taps and swipes are very delayed, to the point where it's extremely annoying.
This is all subjective, I realize, but I was wondering if this is a widespread thing or if I should try to RMA it.
I had heard that CROMi-X was the rom to have, so I flashed 4.6.7.
I had also heard that the GPU was an ass-kicker, so I put on my favorite piece of eye-candy (that I've purchased) which is "Asphalt 7: Heat." - and it ran DOG SLOW, and wasn't particularly candy-ish.
Well, maybe that's an exaggeration, but having the 201 and 700 side-by-side (literally, driving one with each hand, and poorly at that) the 700 was choppy and would pause every so often. It took MUCH longer to load, too.
So I was unhappy.
I read about the slow internal I/O and re-flashed with a Data2SD option, formatted the microcard, the whole nine yards, and it didn't really get any better. fsync is turned OFF.
I side-graded to the older CleanROM Inheritance 3.4.7, and it actually seems SLIGHTLY better, but the UI has a tendency to be very laggy.
I'm going to try "AndroWook" next, I had that on my Prime with good success.
I've googled and found plenty, plenty plenty of people who have a problem with the TF700 and its speed, which is really disappointing because it's supposed to be the top of the line.
So.. is anyone out there really HAPPY with their TF700? Is it zippy and satisfying? What ROM are you using?
Maybe I'll try to unload it on craigslist and go back to the TF201. It has lower "Androbench" marks, but is crazy more responsive.
*shrug*
I'd love to hear anyone's thoughts...
R
Just learned about 'lagfix.'
Gonna try that.
Is 4.1.1 better performance? I realize it'd technically be a step backwards...
rprussell said:
Just learned about 'lagfix.'
Gonna try that.
Is 4.1.1 better performance? I realize it'd technically be a step backwards...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still using 4.1.1. I run Cromi 3.4.6 with Hund's kernel 2.2, along with most of the tweaks found here (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2232715). I am not running data2sd and my CPU/GPU profiles are not as aggressive. Apparently some people have been getting bootloops after applying these tweaks but I've never had it.
I've tried 4.2 several times (with different versions of Cromi-X) but usually come back to 4.1.1 within a day because it seems to run better.
Having said this, I think "lags" can be quite subjective - I personally think my tf700 is zippy but perhaps you wouldn't agree.
rprussell said:
Hey all -
I have been a Transformer (and modding) fan since my TF101, and I just leapt from a TF201 to the infinity.
I'm not sure quite what I was expecting, but I surely wasn't expecting it to be slower. Responses to screen taps and swipes are very delayed, to the point where it's extremely annoying.
This is all subjective, I realize, but I was wondering if this is a widespread thing or if I should try to RMA it.
I had heard that CROMi-X was the rom to have, so I flashed 4.6.7.
I had also heard that the GPU was an ass-kicker, so I put on my favorite piece of eye-candy (that I've purchased) which is "Asphalt 7: Heat." - and it ran DOG SLOW, and wasn't particularly candy-ish.
Well, maybe that's an exaggeration, but having the 201 and 700 side-by-side (literally, driving one with each hand, and poorly at that) the 700 was choppy and would pause every so often. It took MUCH longer to load, too.
So I was unhappy.
I read about the slow internal I/O and re-flashed with a Data2SD option, formatted the microcard, the whole nine yards, and it didn't really get any better. fsync is turned OFF.
I side-graded to the older CleanROM Inheritance 3.4.7, and it actually seems SLIGHTLY better, but the UI has a tendency to be very laggy.
I'm going to try "AndroWook" next, I had that on my Prime with good success.
I've googled and found plenty, plenty plenty of people who have a problem with the TF700 and its speed, which is really disappointing because it's supposed to be the top of the line.
So.. is anyone out there really HAPPY with their TF700? Is it zippy and satisfying? What ROM are you using?
Maybe I'll try to unload it on craigslist and go back to the TF201. It has lower "Androbench" marks, but is crazy more responsive.
*shrug*
I'd love to hear anyone's thoughts...
R
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is odd. With what you said, your TF700 should be very smooth unless there is a hardware problem Did you try a clean install? BTW, if you reinstall again, I would recommend that you should use Cromi X V4.6.5 instead of 4.6.7.
For some reason when I used the Advanced Wipe and wiped everything in TWRP. I still found some old files on my internal SD. However, when I used a formatted option, everything was gone and clean. Maybe you should do that. Also if you use Data2Ram, you should reformat your MicroSD as the same time with your clean install. A combination of Fsync Off, D2R, and Cromi X should work very well. My kernel is Hund's V3.0.6 with OC of 1.4G CPU, 520M GPU for Power Saving, 1.6G CPU, 600M GPU for Normal, and 1.8G CPU, 650M GPU for my Performance with UV about 35mV. My quandrant scores are 5800 for Power Saving = Game Mode, 6400 for Normal = Normal Activities, and 7000s for Performance = Browsing and streaming movies. Please report back if you decide to do a clean install, thanks and good lucks.
Here are my settings and quadrant scores using Hund 2.2:
Power Saving - GPU 650Mhz, CPU 1.45/1.4Ghz - Quadrant 5331
Balanced - GPU 700Mhz, CPU 1.65/1.6Ghz - Quadrant 6336
Performance - GPu 775Mhz, CPU 1.85/1.8 Ghz - Quadrant 7005
Personally I take the quadrant scores with a grain of salt because I've had setups where the scores were better but the tablet was not as responsive. I mostly run on Power Saving mode without any problems.
LetMeKnow said:
Did you try a clean install? BTW, if you reinstall again, I would recommend that you should use Cromi X V4.6.5 instead of 4.6.7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Several totally clean installs at this point.
AndroWook was bust, it didn't even get past the "ASUS" logo.
I'm back to Cromi 3.4.7 with _that's kernel 3.1.10. A lot of folks are mentioning Hund 2.2, perhaps I'll try overlaying that now.
Drenus said:
Having said this, I think "lags" can be quite subjective - I personally think my tf700 is zippy but perhaps you wouldn't agree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree. I added a bunch of the PimpMyRom tweaks and rebooted. I'm letting it settle down and then going to see what's what.
I can't get the GPU overclock to take, though. I think I've mounted the FS r/w and I'm editing the GPU cap files to contain 1460 as directed, but the next time I open the file it's back to 1300. Weird.
So, my Quadrant score after all the tweaks were put in, on "Balanced," is 5266. On "Performance," it's 5139.
Erugh?
rprussell said:
So, my Quadrant score after all the tweaks were put in, on "Balanced," is 5266. On "Performance," it's 5139.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange. I get 5200 in balanced mode without any special tweaks, and over 6000 in performance mode with fsync off.
The general user experience is acceptable, but not exceptionally smooth - lost frames in animations are common, but there are no long waiting times anywhere.
_that said:
Strange. I get 5200 in balanced mode without any special tweaks, and over 6000 in performance mode with fsync off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did I mention I also have fsync off?
('Coz I do.)
Maybe it's faulty, which would make me sad because I doubt I can return it what with unlocking and flashing the crapola out of it. Hm hm.
rprussell said:
I can't get the GPU overclock to take, though. I think I've mounted the FS r/w and I'm editing the GPU cap files to contain 1460 as directed, but the next time I open the file it's back to 1300. Weird.
So, my Quadrant score after all the tweaks were put in, on "Balanced," is 5266. On "Performance," it's 5139.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is really odd. Unfortunately my knowledge of tweaking is entirely based on following other people's instructions so I don't know why the GPU changes are not taking. Are your CPU changes taking? Did you follow the instructions on init.d scripts/enabling his voltage table and governor tweaks?
Here's are my cpu.sh files. I switched the profile for powering saving mode and balanced mode because the tablet always defaults to balanced mode.
-----------------------
Also, when I made the profile too aggressive (too high on CPU or GPU), the tablet got way hot and my quadrant score dropped. Since our tablets are all different on the amount of overclocking they can handle, maybe you're pushing your tablet too much. Have you tried easing down on overclocking?
Drenus said:
Here are my settings and quadrant scores using Hund 2.2:
Power Saving - GPU 650Mhz, CPU 1.45/1.4Ghz - Quadrant 5331
Balanced - GPU 700Mhz, CPU 1.65/1.6Ghz - Quadrant 6336
Performance - GPu 775Mhz, CPU 1.85/1.8 Ghz - Quadrant 7005
Personally I take the quadrant scores with a grain of salt because I've had setups where the scores were better but the tablet was not as responsive. I mostly run on Power Saving mode without any problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL I totally agreed with on that. :laugh: However, I still think that it is better with some numbers as references others than words lags, smooth, choppy, slow, fast, and so on. :good: It is just my way of explanations.
This might be my final entry - after doing the PMR tweaks, and flashing Hund 2.2 (no offense, _that ) the Quadrant score in Performance mode is ... uh.. well, indeterminate because suddenly I can't attach to our wifi. Sigh. Perhaps I overtweaked.
Although, Asphalt ran VERY smoothly. I credit the GPU overclock, in combination with assigning all the 2D stuff to the GPU.
Yeah, definitely. After flashing hund 2.2, it won't acquire an IP address.
Today is surely an interesting day.
rprussell said:
This might be my final entry - after doing the PMR tweaks, and flashing Hund 2.2 (no offense, _that ) the Quadrant score in Performance mode is ... uh.. well, indeterminate because suddenly I can't attach to our wifi. Sigh. Perhaps I overtweaked.
Although, Asphalt ran VERY smoothly. I credit the GPU overclock, in combination with assigning all the 2D stuff to the GPU.
Yeah, definitely. After flashing hund 2.2, it won't acquire an IP address.
Today is surely an interesting day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You probably have problems because of PMR tweaks I remember I also had wifi issues after PMR and I think I didn't enable all the tweaks in the guide. Try PMR recovery where it restores all your previous settings-it should restore your wifi. If not, then maybe a clean install of Cromi and then doing the init.d/Hund/CPU/GPU tweaks should give you quite a bit of performance boost.
Hope by "final entry" you don't mean you're giving up!
Drenus said:
You probably have problems because of PMR tweaks I remember I also had wifi issues after PMR and I think I didn't enable all the tweaks in the guide. Try PMR recovery where it restores all your previous settings-it should restore your wifi. If not, then maybe a clean install of Cromi and then doing the init.d/Hund/CPU/GPU tweaks should give you quite a bit of performance boost.
Hope by "final entry" you don't mean you're giving up!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it seems as if the "Fast DNS" internet tweak means it has somehow thrown off DHCP.
I'm connected to the wifi AP, but I get no IP address, etc.
I guess I'll flash the recovery thing. Darn, everything but that was working great
No, I had meant to say 'final entry' insofar as I was finally happy with it - but while i was typing it, I wanted to put in the Quadrant score, and then I realize I couldn't connect to the website, and then I realized I had no IP, and here we are.
So that post sort of morphed as I was typing...
rprussell said:
I guess I'll flash the recovery thing. Darn, everything but that was working great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Huh.
Wont' flash, at least not with twrp 2.4.4.0
Growf.
rprussell said:
Huh.
Wont' flash, at least not with twrp 2.4.4.0
Growf.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is just as well, since when I rebooted I had an IP again.
Recovery image went south too, and I had to re-flash that via adb.
There is truly some weird stuff happening here.
Anyway, the quadrant score - now on "Performance" because I swapped cpu2 and cpu3, what a great idea - is...
IS.....
IS.....
5057.
Ah, the hell with it.
rprussell said:
Which is just as well, since when I rebooted I had an IP again.
Recovery image went south too, and I had to re-flash that via adb.
There is truly some weird stuff happening here.
Anyway, the quadrant score - now on "Performance" because I swapped cpu2 and cpu3, what a great idea - is...
IS.....
IS.....
5057.
Ah, the hell with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that is just odd. Does the tablet get really hot when you run quadrant? It might be that the GPU/CPU settings are too high. Hope actual performance is still working out for you.
And as for recovery, I meant running the rescue package inside PMR that "un-pimps" the rom. Thinking back on when I installed the tweaks, I think I did everything mentioned in PMR except for Network & Internet mods. And I love the xloud mod!
Drenus said:
Wow, that is just odd. Does the tablet get really hot when you run quadrant? It might be that the GPU/CPU settings are too high. Hope actual performance is still working out for you.
And as for recovery, I meant running the rescue package inside PMR that "un-pimps" the rom. Thinking back on when I installed the tweaks, I think I did everything mentioned in PMR except for Network & Internet mods. And I love the xloud mod!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was pretty warm, yeah. I knocked the cpu back from 1900mhz to 1800mhz - which doesn't seem to matter since according to the little floating CPU monitor I have ("Cool Tool") it's never going over 1600mhz anyway.
I mean, I've got PMR trying to control stuff on one hand, the built-in "Power Saving/Balanced/performance" thing on the other, and also "Trickster Mod"
Idunno.
It does seem perkier after all this, so maybe it doesn't matter.
I wish Quadrant would let me see my score without hitting the internet though. I backed off the voltages by 0.025v per speed, and came up with 5499 this time. Although I don't know whether that's "performance" or what.
rprussell said:
It was pretty warm, yeah. I knocked the cpu back from 1900mhz to 1800mhz - which doesn't seem to matter since according to the little floating CPU monitor I have ("Cool Tool") it's never going over 1600mhz anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you use Hundsbuah's app to set whatever parameters need to be set?
Sorry for not being more specific, I have no experience with it, I just know Hundsbuah didn't only add awesome overclocking features into his kernel, but he also wrote an app to control it.
rprussell said:
I mean, I've got PMR trying to control stuff on one hand, the built-in "Power Saving/Balanced/performance" thing on the other, and also "Trickster Mod"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And this is in addition to changing cpu#.ch files? I wonder if you've got too many cooks in the kitchen.
rprussell said:
It does seem perkier after all this, so maybe it doesn't matter.
I wish Quadrant would let me see my score without hitting the internet though. I backed off the voltages by 0.025v per speed, and came up with 5499 this time. Although I don't know whether that's "performance" or what.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is Asphalt still running better than before? I think the most important thing is that the applications you use are running smoothly and not upsetting you that (1) you spent $$$ on the tablet, (2) you spent a lot of time tweaking the tablet, and (3) you're not getting the performance you want.
I once spent a few hours tweaking CPU/GPU to figure out how I can maximize Quadrant score and what I came away from it is that high score doesn't matter if the tablet is getting way to hot for comfort and that low score doesn't matter if the tablet is running to my satisfaction. I almost never change my power setting and that means my score is probably around 5300, but I still like how the tablet responds.
Anyways, hope your tablet's running better than before and good luck with any additional tweaking! :victory:
_that said:
Did you use Hundsbuah's app to set whatever parameters need to be set?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well.. that's just madness.
No, I was not. I had these other tools and was messing with those.
Might be time to re-flash the kernel again.