This Post is in wrong section but i think many people who belongs to CM team visit this section rapidly.
There is some question to CM team who manage P500 ROM.
1- last/First stable release is published about 6 months earlier.
2- Day by day your ROM getting Buggy. means we cant use Phone is there is no network.
3- You release weekly new Rom without solving past bug.
4- think how many ROM you have published but still not got a good stable full featured ROM.
5- why you still struck with same GB ROM why you not trying ICS or JB for P500 officially.
Please consider this post seriously because i love cm ROM. This post is just represent the frustration of Cm lovers.
Hope Next release will works fine...
rash97's CM10 works perfectly from my end. You're probably downloading all the experimental ones.
I do see your perspective but according to their wiki:
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/wiki/Latest_Version
Stable versions are those where all known issues have been addressed and resolved. This version is for everyday use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nightly builds are daily compiled builds from source. This version therefore has the latest bleeding edge features & tweaks, but it is also the mostly likely to have bugs and issues. This version is not for general use. Nightly builds are available here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you really want a bugfree rom, just stick with the stable release. I don't see a difference between the stable and the nightlies other than the stable release is stable and the nightlies aren't.
That was for your points 1-4. And for 5, let's be reasonable. The P500 is pretty old and shouldn't even be running ICS or JB.
LG-P501 said:
This Post is in wrong section but i think many people who belongs to CM team visit this section rapidly.
There is some question to CM team who manage P500 ROM.
1- last/First stable release is published about 6 months earlier.
2- Day by day your ROM getting Buggy. means we cant use Phone is there is no network.
3- You release weekly new Rom without solving past bug.
4- think how many ROM you have published but still not got a good stable full featured ROM.
5- why you still struck with same GB ROM why you not trying ICS or JB for P500 officially.
Please consider this post seriously because i love cm ROM. This post is just represent the frustration of Cm lovers.
Hope Next release will works fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I am recalling it right then you are that fake Guy who said "I have working camera for ics I will upload it soon" right?
You earn so many thanks for that fake stunt.
Then after some months you came again and ask in every thread "xyz is not working what to do"
And now you post this **** in wrong thread .
Now listen
Our phone is still alive because of Developers.
Did they ask you for money?
Simply No.
Take what are they giving.
If you don't like it then don't complaint.
If you don't know what's going on here then go away or stick to the stock.
sent from my satellite
LG-P501 said:
This Post is in wrong section but i think many people who belongs to CM team visit this section rapidly.
There is some question to CM team who manage P500 ROM.
1- last/First stable release is published about 6 months earlier.
2- Day by day your ROM getting Buggy. means we cant use Phone is there is no network.
3- You release weekly new Rom without solving past bug.
4- think how many ROM you have published but still not got a good stable full featured ROM.
5- why you still struck with same GB ROM why you not trying ICS or JB for P500 officially.
Please consider this post seriously because i love cm ROM. This post is just represent the frustration of Cm lovers.
Hope Next release will works fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you don't have a right to blame anyone, people are helping you by providing you CM and other ROMs, they are not working for you here. And official ICS won't be there because we couldn't have ICS(cm9) with .35 kernel officially
Agree with Aspee....and Mods - this thread needs deletion, more so from the development threads.
LG-P501 said:
This Post is in wrong section but i think many people who belongs to CM team visit this section rapidly.
There is some question to CM team who manage P500 ROM.
1- last/First stable release is published about 6 months earlier.
2- Day by day your ROM getting Buggy. means we cant use Phone is there is no network.
3- You release weekly new Rom without solving past bug.
4- think how many ROM you have published but still not got a good stable full featured ROM.
5- why you still struck with same GB ROM why you not trying ICS or JB for P500 officially.
Please consider this post seriously because i love cm ROM. This post is just represent the frustration of Cm lovers.
Hope Next release will works fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you even dare to write such a words?
Optimus One was never meant to be any kind of flagship, so is quite natural, that
it's based on deprecated hardware platform. Even though, devs made quite an spectacular amount of work and brought us some truly amazing work. Due to hardware limitations, there won't be any newer stable ROM than CM7. Also, the number of people willing to develop for Optimus One is inevitably shrinking as they move to more modern platforms.
Last, but not least, have you ever donated a single penny to CM team or any freelance O1 dev? They are doing it for free in their spare time!
this user should be banned for dis-couraging the developers, post on wrong section, too many spams earlier, not obeying rules, just some fckn ****. and hes done, we dont need you, nor xda so go to hell
sushant_1727 said:
this user should be banned for dis-couraging the developers, post on wrong section, too many spams earlier, not obeying rules, just some fckn ****. and hes done, we dont need you, nor xda so go to hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why dont u just add him to ur ignore list?
The CM code base is stable, no software is ever bug free, this is one of the main reasons that this community exists. To fix bugs and provide newer and mostly better releases. This devices was never designed to run anything higher than GB to begin with, whining because hobbyist developers cannot produce fast enough is rather pathetic. If you don't like it, feel free to pull the source and do it yourself.
The people developing for P500 are among the most talented on xda, this is the reason why a lowly device has such a huge following here. If you look at other, newer/better devices, you will notice that very few have their own forum and their roms are usually only available in the Android Development and hacking section.
The work that our devs have been doing is truly outstanding, we have ports for every conceivable rom out there (cept for thin rom which i personally would love to see) and in a very good working order too. I use CM9 by hephappy as my daily driver and I have to admit, I cannot use the stock rom or any GB based rom simply because of the features provided by ICS.
So please, rather give thanks and provide bug reports, the devs want to build these roms for us, don't make them pull out just because you have no tact
If u want stable cm y don't u develop it for yourself. Stop complaining . If u don't like cm and if its not stable den don't use it as simple as that. Use the stock rom. U r not paying the developers so just keep quite. Don't spam the developers thread. People like u are not meant to be on xda.
Peace.
Sent from my LG-P690 using xda app-developers app
Rule: There is one rule to live happy life....'Don't expect anything from others and share what you have'
Reality: Reality is that we keep high expectations from others but personally don't have anything valuable to share
Result: As a result we always complain!
I know he's just trolling, but even his claims are wrong.. :laugh:
CM has released a stable release in the last 6 months i.e. in June.
So you should've trolled the next month.
Better luck next time!
Also, please change your avatar, you're embarrassing Chuck!
LG-P501 said:
This Post is in wrong section but i think many people who belongs to CM team visit this section rapidly.
There is some question to CM team who manage P500 ROM.
1- last/First stable release is published about 6 months earlier.
2- Day by day your ROM getting Buggy. means we cant use Phone is there is no network.
3- You release weekly new Rom without solving past bug.
4- think how many ROM you have published but still not got a good stable full featured ROM.
5- why you still struck with same GB ROM why you not trying ICS or JB for P500 officially.
Please consider this post seriously because i love cm ROM. This post is just represent the frustration of Cm lovers.
Hope Next release will works fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM has already released a stable rom that is really ready for daily use and a lot better then stock LG rom: it's CM 7.2 with Gingerbread.
Other Android releases are declared not compatible with poor hardware of the lg p500, so others cm roms you see are not officials, derivated from public cm sources and modified.
It's not possible an official cm > 7 (cm9 - cm10) for Lg Optimus One.
If you want a CM9-CM10 rom stable in your smartphone it's not a cm fault, but a LG P500 fault, it's really old, even if is a good phone.
I use Oxygen 3.0.0 with ICS for daily use, i have some reboots but very rare, even if they happen (every 90-100 hours...).
It this is good for you, try Oxygen by Popdog, in case not, change your smartphone, you can not pretend to have latest technologies without spending money!
Silencer96 said:
rash97's CM10 works perfectly from my end. You're probably downloading all the experimental ones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must be trolling or don't use your phone for much it is buggy and slow.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
The reason they don't have a stable ROM is because your not a developer, because if you were it would be stable.
Post in the correct section next time.
Thread Closed.
Related
Any one has witness this? Mr. Netchip from i9001 forum has already build their cyanogenmod test build today! Where is i9003 one?
(I am not blaming anyone, I would make my very effort in helping any of us who would like to make our phone better, our phone must gain the thing that other have also!)
Things we ought to do to make our phone better:
Cyanogenmod 7 (Can wait until the Final release come up)
MIUI (Somehow we are requesting, but still waiting...)
TV-out (Researching is in progress, but we have to get a more update source for doing it. Gaining other developers support is also very important. May be some developer from Motorola Milestone or LG optimus black can help.)
A complete stable enough kernel, can be overclocked to 1.2 Ghz or more and with some more features. (I believe our phone has enough top-level developer to do this. But the most important things is we must wait for a better and updated stock kernel. I think Samsung will release its forth stable GingerBread ROM in the upcoming days. Probably an Asia ROM.)
I fell confident to our phone because our phone has a potential to be better. We have to gain more support from some other place. I suggest we can co-operate with developers from LG optimus black, they have their oc kernel too. But stable. We have many similarities, both have a chipset TI OMAP 3630, same display resolution, both have open source kernel, also waiting for porting cyanogenmod, miui etc.
Well, talked so much about LG optimus black. At last I hope everyone in i9003 can help together to fight for a better future for our phone...
---------- Post added at 06:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:55 PM ----------
Also, one more thing we should fight for:
Tell everybody in the world, i9003 is different from i9000! We should have a different forum!!!
fxzy said:
Any one has witness this? Mr. Netchip from i9001 forum has already build their cyanogenmod test build today! Where is i9003 one?
[/COLOR]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the i9001 build doesnt work!!
and fyi,they dont even have cwm!!!
Right! i9001 has CM7? I think we need to take a giant leap and port cm7! Let's see what happens! Ther reason why our phon eis not populare is because many people are going for a S or S2 with a cost of only some extra bucks! Our phone is only populare in Asia-Pacific region! We also need experienced Developers! Each and every i9003 XDA user is learning developement! (Which is a very very very good thing!) And , hence, we can soon make our phone better!
Cm7 for i9003!
All developers unite! !!!
A call to arms! !
Sent from my gt-I9003 with A.I. Type
+1
we would build an developers group with i9003 1st, to start...
and i hope others who have much income can do have a donation for this group so that they can buy a beer..
I have an idea. I will be downloading cm7 for i9000. I can see the structure of the file and I can try porting it! I would suggest everybody to download a CWM flashable zip and try this thing out. Also, I will not be availabel until 26th due to some personal reasons. The first thing I begin to do in the morning of September 26th will be to work on the structure and the port. I think, I can run CM7 on a stock CWM kernal! Let's wait and watch! Just wait......And Watch! ;-;
That sounds great!
@ rohan
rohan i really appreciate ur efforts. But galaxy s has complete different file structure & modified kernal than galaxy sl.
I said again & again & still saying that plz dont discuss by creating threads only. Instead of this plz contact cynogen mod developers & convince them to work for us. I really observed one thing that many people on our forum just want thing without any effort. By just writing here that we want CM7 not a single developer will look into ur thread even. If we approach other super developer and literally beg them to help us then @ least they will start to think upon our request. It may be successful or not but at least outer world will come to know the potential & spirit we all people have for our phone.
香港既朋友.....
pls for our phone
fengjia1313 said:
香港既朋友.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
香港的朋友。。。你好。。
Well, here is international forum, use English plz...
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA Premium App
The dev who's working on the cm7 thing for the i9001 , 'netchip', does NOT own the phone and He's currently got a kernel for sgs2 (which he uses) too..
So i think we should ask him to help us with porting the cyanogen mod to our phone.. What say ??
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
CyanogenMod-7.1.0-RC1-Cooper-KANG (Beta) by Grif_07
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1263292
Cyano Ace Port 7.1 by BehradGH
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1258830
Just released few days ago For Galaxy Ace
Maybe we can ask them to help us..
please, somebody with GB, can you tell me if we have the following files in the filesystem:
/system/vendor/* (for example /system/vendor/bin/gpsd, /system/vendor/etc/gps.xml, /system/vendor/lib/hw/gps.aries.so)
/system/lib/libsamsungcamera.so
/radio/modem.bin
I asked it here but nobody answer it...
These files (and many more) need to make CM7 work with our environment
falex007 said:
please, somebody with GB, can you tell me if we have the following files in the filesystem:
/system/vendor/* (for example /system/vendor/bin/gpsd, /system/vendor/etc/gps.xml, /system/vendor/lib/hw/gps.aries.so)
/system/lib/libsamsungcamera.so
/radio/modem.bin
I asked it here but nobody answer it...
These files (and many more) need to make CM7 work with our environment
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gps aries.so,libsamsungcamera.so isnt there
and there is no radio folder!
glad to see other users bothered just like me wanting CM7, wish i had experience in these things to help or do something, but glad am not alone \o/, hope we get our CM7 soon!
Our phone needs a proper rom atm
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
Galaxy Ace got cm7
i9003 deserves cm7
even my old samsung galaxy i5700 got cm7 :/
I tried attempting in doing what I can to get CM7 looked into, problem lies in, Even if we get 90% into completing it, Without a hacked/broken down kernel, there's no way we can enjoy the benefits.
I have seen 2 GT-I9003 installed in http://stats.cyanogenmod.com/.
I think someone trying to do.
where are there no roms for the gt 6210??
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1547152
p6210 has this one only
we have no rom as we have no codes Samsung will not let them go
renegade37918 said:
where are there no roms for the gt 6210??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are quite a few reasons we don't. Number one is that there is not a lot of interest in this device by developers. Gary right now is pretty much our only one and he has already said he eventually will get around to making ROMs but not right away. A few of us have the basic knowledge to maybe hack something together but without good kernels a lot of the hardware may or may not work, wifi for one. There are ways to get these things to work like porting over other devices kernels, but that is beyond most of us here. The 7.7's could be ported over as it has similar hardware and you could probably port over ICS from it too. You would need a good kernel developer who has the time to do it. On top of it Honeycomb isn't the easiest thing to make ROMs for, MIUI and CyanogenMod don't have Honeycomb versions. Once ICS drops we can use that kernel to at least try and port over MIUI 4 and CM9 but its still a lot of work and again having only one dev doesn't help. We will need a team effort to get a lot of it done.
kzoodroid said:
There are quite a few reasons we don't. Number one is that there is not a lot of interest in this device by developers. Gary right now is pretty much our only one and he has already said he eventually will get around to making ROMs but not right away. A few of us have the basic knowledge to maybe hack something together but without good kernels a lot of the hardware may or may not work, wifi for one. There are ways to get these things to work like porting over other devices kernels, but that is beyond most of us here. The 7.7's could be ported over as it has similar hardware and you could probably port over ICS from it too. You would need a good kernel developer who has the time to do it. On top of it Honeycomb isn't the easiest thing to make ROMs for, MIUI and CyanogenMod don't have Honeycomb versions. Once ICS drops we can use that kernel to at least try and port over MIUI 4 and CM9 but its still a lot of work and again having only one dev doesn't help. We will need a team effort to get a lot of it done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not much, but I've started a device tree with some initial work on a CM9 port. If you've got a copy of CM9's repository, clone this repo into the device/samsung directory, then you'll be able to start working on building CM9: https://github.com/alanorth/device_samsung_galaxytab7p
Also, I have a kernel repo here: https://github.com/alanorth/samsung-kernel-p6200
And a collection of initramfs (including touch and non-touch ClockworkMod Recovery): https://github.com/alanorth/GT-P6200-initramfs
If you're at ALL interested in helping with development on this device (especially CM9), fork those repos and start experimenting with building/tweaking STOCK stuff first.
I'm more interested in trying to port over MIUI 4 (ICS version). Been reading up on how to do it but really need the ICS kernel for our device first before I will even attempt it. I pretty much feel confident I could at least get a bootable version up and running but as far as fixing things that are broken that would take a lot more than I might be able to handle on my own. Say if wifi is broken I'm not sure where to go to even start fixing it. I could hang out on the IRC channels to get answers but then this is just a part time interest of mine and not a career.
When will ICS come out? Come on Samsung.
aorth said:
It's not much, but I've started a device tree with some initial work on a CM9 port. If you've got a copy of CM9's repository, clone this repo into the device/samsung directory, then you'll be able to start working on building CM9: https://github.com/alanorth/device_samsung_galaxytab7p
Also, I have a kernel repo here: https://github.com/alanorth/samsung-kernel-p6200
And a collection of initramfs (including touch and non-touch ClockworkMod Recovery): https://github.com/alanorth/GT-P6200-initramfs
If you're at ALL interested in helping with development on this device (especially CM9), fork those repos and start experimenting with building/tweaking STOCK stuff first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I use this any of this for the GT-p210? Or is it GT-p200 specific only?
Edit: Nevermind I see that it's mostly device, android and vendor.mk stuff
To build ROMs we are going to need kernels, MIUI amd CM require an AOSP kernel which you can make following the instructions on the cyanogenmod wiki, it is way beyond me as I struggle with Linux in general. There are devs out there who only make kernels and maybe we could enlist their help in doing this.
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php?title=Building_Kernel_from_source
Now according to cyanogenmod the wifi kernel is seperate and you need the drivers in order to fix it. And from what I understand the drivers for our device will not be released any time soon so this is going to be a real issue.
For porting over another touchwiz ROM we could use the stock kernel but you need the specific kernel for each version of android. Honeycomb kernels don't work with ICS or GB. But since there isn't much of a difference in the touchwiz ROMs between all the Galaxy Tabs why bother even doing this. Right now the only reason I see to try would be to get the 7.7 ICS ROM on our device but since we will be getting the upgrade soon anyways why bother. The upgrade will drop before you could ever get all the bugs worked out of it anyways in my opinion.
Here is the link for AOSP, explains all you need to set up a Linux PC to become a developer. An AOSP kernel will be critical to further development, right now all we could build would be an AOSP Honeycomb kernel as that is the only source code out. Samsung will eventually release the ICS kernel source sometime soon after ICS drops. I have a Linux box at home but I'm not very familar with it, also I think its the latest version which won't work. I really don't like working with Linux its a pain. I do everything in Windows using a virutal machine but should swtich over just because it what most devs use and its easier for them to help you if your on the same page so to speak.
http://s.android.com/index.html
Gladly take cm9 with no wifi
chrisrotolo said:
Gladly take cm9 with no wifi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
snap!!! i would also love to see it on our tab. i would even consider forgetting WiFi till its fixed i want it that bad i don't see how some one has not made it with out WiFi just a basic platform to work with
Nice news! Every android device I had, I always found ROMs for. When I bought the P6200 I came here smiling and..... OOOPS no ROMS I was crying 'cuz I always had ONLY TO CHOOSE which one to flash with all my devices (such as Motorola Xoom or Galaxy Note)
I know this one doesn't pretty interest to devs or it has not much business (such as GS2 for example) but I hope we could see nice things soon (just 'cuz the worse thing is that for the old Tab 7...There're lots of ROMs :banghead: )
Let's wait so. And having MIUI here would be the best thing I ever had
Sent from my Galaxy Note with DarkyROM 3.3
1. they have the source release for their device
2. samsung is being a b***h about releasing the source code for our lovely device...
3. we cant do a lot of thing without a source...
4. go head to development section to see some work...
edan1979 said:
1. they have the source release for their device
2. samsung is being a b***h about releasing the source code for our lovely device...
3. we cant do a lot of thing without a source...
4. go head to development section to see some work...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it all dude, and I've already seen the dev section Why are you all so touchy in Tab 7 Plus section?
Thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Note with DarkyROM 3.3
Sorry if you feel were a little touchy here, its just that sometimes there complete noobs that come here to the forums and don't even think about checking the android development section or even bother to read other threads that hold the answer to their questions.
bdds13 said:
Sorry if you feel were a little touchy here, its just that sometimes there complete noobs that come here to the forums and don't even think about checking the android development section or even bother to read other threads that hold the answer to their questions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry, I understand I even read about people asking always the same things bothering to read threads before posting
Thank you, it was really kind from you to explain Sorry for off-topic
Sent from my Galaxy Note with DarkyROM 3.3
edan1979 said:
1. they have the source release for their device
2. samsung is being a b***h about releasing the source code for our lovely device...
3. we cant do a lot of thing without a source...
4. go head to development section to see some work...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But we do have source aren't we?
Hi, since I cant post on the development board (not enough posts) I´ll ask here.
I have a P6810 with official Android 4.0.4 and wonder if the KitKat roms available (Slim, CM, Omni) are stable and noticeably better than official 4.0.4? If so, which one is more mature/stable/recommended? Thanks a lot
jonoro11 said:
Hi, since I cant post on the development board (not enough posts) I´ll ask here.
I have a P6810 with official Android 4.0.4 and wonder if the KitKat roms available (Slim, CM, Omni) are stable and noticeably better than official 4.0.4? If so, which one is more mature/stable/recommended? Thanks a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All 3 have some nice features and have come a long way. Suggest you read the posts for each ROM and experiment with each to pick the one you like best. All of them are excellent to use as a daily ROM. If you have the room for backups you can do a backup on each as you set them up and switch as periodic releases are provided by Daniel. The releases (improvements) have been happening about every two weeks and it is amazing how the developer keeps them all current as possible.
Users have worked to keep the community up to date on potential issues and observations and reading the posts should answer many of your questions. :fingers-crossed: Best of luck and i hope you enjoy the ROMs as it seems that the developer does a wonderful job with each of them.
Thanks ColBill
jonoro11 said:
Thanks ColBill
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. Daniel released another version of the ROM (Carbon) yesterday or today. I'm trying this new ROM tonight. The writeup looks good and based on Daniel's prior work this ROM will be exceptional as well. Looking forward to playing with it. How you enjoy trying and picking a ROM good luck.:good:
Hi guys
My Atrix 2 is currently on jellybean leak. I want to upgrade to a newer version of android but stability is a big concern for me.
I was looking for best stable ROM for 4.3 or 4.4.2 and came across [ROM][4.3][OFFICIAL & NIGHTLIES]MoKee OpenSource Project
Because of my post count I can't post in this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2305303&highlight=bug
It would be great if you could give me heads up about bugs related to this rom or suggest any other more stable rom with virtually no bugs.
satan194p said:
Hi guys
My Atrix 2 is currently on jellybean leak. I want to upgrade to a newer version of android but stability is a big concern for me.
I was looking for best stable ROM for 4.3 or 4.4.2 and came across [ROM][4.3][OFFICIAL & NIGHTLIES]MoKee OpenSource Project
Because of my post count I can't post in this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2305303&highlight=bug
It would be great if you could give me heads up about bugs related to this rom or suggest any other more stable rom with virtually no bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All bugs will be listed and/or discussed within the threads. It's best to go ahead and read through them so that you can make an informed decision as to which one will work best for you. There is no such thing as a "best ROM" as everyone's preferences and usage habits are different. Just do some reading and research then pick a few to try out. It's the best way to familiarize yourself with the flashing process anyway.
1BadWolf said:
All bugs will be listed and/or discussed within the threads. It's best to go ahead and read through them so that you can make an informed decision as to which one will work best for you. There is no such thing as a "best ROM" as everyone's preferences and usage habits are different. Just do some reading and research then pick a few to try out. It's the best way to familiarize yourself with the flashing process anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Hey guys I've had my g3 rooted for a couple months now and I have yet to find a really good ROM to use cm12 was to buggy and grew tired of nightlies. Liquidsmooth was really good only issue I had was Skype and hangouts. I'm on candy5 latest build now and I'm getting a lot of glitches, force closes, etc. I've clean installed the last 2 roms and experience problems. If Liquidsmooth didn't have that Skype issue I would probably stuck to it. Any ROM suggestions?
Nexus.S said:
Hey guys I've had my g3 rooted for a couple months now and I have yet to find a really good ROM to use cm12 was to buggy and grew tired of nightlies. Liquidsmooth was really good only issue I had was Skype and hangouts. I'm on candy5 latest build now and I'm getting a lot of glitches, force closes, etc. I've clean installed the last 2 roms and experience problems. If Liquidsmooth didn't have that Skype issue I would probably stuck to it. Any ROM suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For the most part, all the AOSP Roms like the ones you received will have similar bugs until they are ironed out over time. The least buggy Roms are those based of the lg ROM. Right now there are only 2 stock lg lollipop Roms. Both of them are very stable however they're basically just rooted versions of the stock lollipop ROM.
I see thanks for the reply can you link me 2 the 2.
Nexus.S said:
I see thanks for the reply can you link me 2 the 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously..... Go to Android Development section
2SHAYNEZ
Nexus.S said:
I see thanks for the reply can you link me 2 the 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[ROM][STOCK][BUMP'd] LG D850 20F Lollipop 5.0.1 (+ extras)
TekROM - D850 - Stock 20f - Lollipop - Deodex/Root/Busybox
Keep in mind both still have all that carrier bloat we love to hate. I use the first rom without issue and debloated it myself using titanium backup.
I'm surprised we don't have more roms. It's a great phone but I feel that support is lacking.
muppetmaster916 said:
I'm surprised we don't have more roms. It's a great phone but I feel that support is lacking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because the development took and still takes lots of work. The devs had a lot of work just to root Lollipop, then to flash twrp. But I also do think that between all roms available (including KK roms and LP roms) we don't have as many as other devices from the same gen have. Heck, I had my Galaxy S3 and there were ports for everything. Can't complain though, between the stock ones and illusion (talking my preferences), I feel complete.
muppetmaster916 said:
I'm surprised we don't have more roms. It's a great phone but I feel that support is lacking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For KitKat, there's plenty of ROMs available, partially due to the fact that porting D855 ROMs was cake (swap out kernel and modules, and you're golden). That's why there weren't too many D850-specific ROMs.
On LP, there's a new handshake process between ROM and kernel, so we can't do that...yet. I feel like "development" on ROMs as a result is going to be hindered, since there's hope that the process will get cracked, then we can just port straight from D855 with little effort. Otherwise, if we have to mess about with the D85020f base, it'll take much more time.
TemporaryTester said:
For KitKat, there's plenty of ROMs available, partially due to the fact that porting D855 ROMs was cake (swap out kernel and modules, and you're golden). That's why there weren't too many D850-specific ROMs.
On LP, there's a new handshake process between ROM and kernel, so we can't do that...yet. I feel like "development" on ROMs as a result is going to be hindered, since there's hope that the process will get cracked, then we can just port straight from D855 with little effort. Otherwise, if we have to mess about with the D85020f base, it'll take much more time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha, I wonder if this is being worked on. If so do you know of a thread where progress could be tracked?
muppetmaster916 said:
Gotcha, I wonder if this is being worked on. If so do you know of a thread where progress could be tracked?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Spz0 has been talking about this as of late in his OA855-5 ROM thread, as he is readying to move the ROM to Lollipop.
The defacto LG standard ROM of many, CloudyG3 by @Cloudyfa, also will inevitably jump on this bandwagon, but he hasn't been spotted in a while. He's probably just busy or something.
Not sure why this thread even exists.. this subject has been discussed ad nauseam in the Lounge.
@Nexus.S the question you've asked is one that will never offer ONE end all solid answer. It is truly a case of "to each his own". You need to continue doing what you were doing and try obe that fits all of your needs.
There are literally hundreds of users that have commented on every rom available for this device. Asking there will get you quicker answers, rather then waiting for people to find your thread and post something witty.
Threads of this type end up being nothing more then, OT threads.
Please check the index (found HERE) which lists all the roms for this device.
smac7 said:
[ROM][STOCK][BUMP'd] LG D850 20F Lollipop 5.0.1 (+ extras)
TekROM - D850 - Stock 20f - Lollipop - Deodex/Root/Busybox
Keep in mind both still have all that carrier bloat we love to hate. I use the first rom without issue and debloated it myself using titanium backup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can also vouch for the first one. In fact, I was far less aggressive with debloating and have skipped xposed for now... and it's more stable, better battery life and (IMO) a better UI.
Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk
Beanstalk. Enough said.
Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk
TonyStark said:
Not sure why this thread even exists.. this subject has been discussed ad nauseam in the Lounge.
@Nexus.S the question you've asked is one that will never offer ONE end all solid answer. It is truly a case of "to each his own". You need to continue doing what you were doing and try obe that fits all of your needs.
There are literally hundreds of users that have commented on every rom available for this device. Asking there will get you quicker answers, rather then waiting for people to find your thread and post something witty.
Threads of this type end up being nothing more then, OT threads.
Please check the index (found HERE) which lists all the roms for this device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. For some it's more the 'personal process' of discussion with others that seems important, and less the strict data/direct content of the discussion.
resurrection remix 5.0.2 is a really great rom i had doubts because it was based off of cm but i was impressed