Well...I suppose this isn't devvin, but, I learned a little about build.prop modifications from the devs and experience on my Acer Iconia A100. Soooo, I decided to share a few tweaks that have made me notice some difference in performance.
Here is a cut of the lines I added into the build.prop:
============================================================================
# Added by justjackyl#
dalvik.vm.heapgrowthlimit=64m
dalvik.vm.heapstartsize=8m
debug.performance.tuning=1
net.tcp.buffersize.default=4096,87380,256960,4096, 16384,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.edge=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.gprs=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.umts=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.wifi=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
pm.sleep_mode=1
ro.config.nocheckin=1
ro.ril.disable.power.collapse=1
video.accelerate.hw=1
wifi.supplicant_scan_interval=180
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=150
=============================================================
This should give a slight boost on overall responsiveness, video performance, slight memory performance to the dalvik VM, and decrease wirelesss canning to save battery, as well as boost wireless performance and throuput, as well as possible power saving across the board (only slight increase, say 5-10% MAX so don't expect huge savings!)
Anyone willing to test with me? These tweaks really pumped life into my Tegra 2 tablet, and seem to being doing the same, while being stable so far, on my G2x.
To use the mod, you just need to use a root access file browser, browse to system, rename the current build.prop to build.prop.bak and copy and paste in the build.prop.mod one. Just make sure whichever one you are using, it is named build.prop with no extensions, so rename build.prop.mod to build.prop, and same to restore your back up original.
Than boot into recovery, wipe cache and dalvik cache, reboot and good to go.
Your first couple reboot cycles may be slower than normal as dalvik cache is rebuilding.
File----> justjackyl's build.prop mod for G2x
Posting this to see it in tapatalk and start trying it...!
ready, i put it after the V6 build.prop entries... only thing that i dont have used are the signal mods becouse v6 already have imput different values...
net.tcp.buffersize.default=4096,87380,256960,4096, 16384,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.edge=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.gprs=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.umts=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.wifi=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DankoFGL said:
Posting this to see it in tapatalk and start trying it...!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This should work on any CM7.2 ROM, maybe GB. I'll test that later.
It will not brick or cause bootloop on a CM7.2 ROM.
i use last cm7 nightly and worked well...
DankoFGL said:
Posting this to see it in tapatalk and start trying it...!
ready, i put it after the V6 build.prop entries... only thing that i dont have used are the signal mods becouse v6 already have imput different values...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've actually never even used V6, so now I feel sorta stupid because I suppose most my tweaks are there. lol
Not, not all your tweaks are there, i use all of the twaks that you posted with the exception of the net edits
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
DankoFGL said:
i use last cm7 nightly and worked well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you did notice a difference?
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/ Trinity TD1.58 kernel (testing)
Let me test it for one or two days, i getting a litle better battery performance while sleeping, also my max events per sec are 200 and worked better than 150 at scrolling
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
DankoFGL said:
Let me test it for one or two days, i getting a litle better battery performance while sleeping, also my max events per sec are 200 and worked better than 150 at scrolling
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.
I wonder if it may be a difference between Faux054 and Trinity158
Has you see any difference between this two kernels?
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
DankoFGL said:
Has you see any difference between this two kernels?
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In contrast to this mod?
Or between the two kernels themselves?
With or without the mod, talk.about your experience
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
DankoFGL said:
With or without the mod, talk.about your experience
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well...the mod itself is in testing, as these mods worked on a Tegra 2 tablet, but may not work so well for this Tegra 2 phone.
As for the kernels...
I started modding in Jan 2012 and faux was the first GB kernel I ever found, and so I kinda became a faux fanboy when going for CM7 ROMs.
I've used Trinity, but not much experience with the ELP series. (cricketAC intro'd me to those)
I've used faux and can't even remember how old.
Both SOD randomly. I was able to control it more with faux.
Both random reboot, not often. I found faux OOM Panic and reboot more often than Trinity, but I don't multi tasks too hard, so I kept it in control, but faux would lag like an SOB sometimes.
Both OC nicely, but I prefer faux over Trinity in this case. Faux offers more steps in between frequencies than the Trinity I used, while both obtained an OC of >=1.5GHz.
The steps in frequencies are important to me as An underclock at 750MHz than next step is 1GHz, with Trinity, or an underclock of I think 654MHz and steps to 816Mhz, 912MHz and 1GHz, as with faux.
With the steps being laid out, I had better battery with faux as it had more room to play with frequency steps than Trinity. If you only can jump from 750 to 1Ghz when 750 wasn't enough, than your using more juice than if you jumped from 654 to 816 to 912 and CPU finds 912 was enough, well you didn't hit 1GHz and saved a little bit more juice.
So faux wins in battery.
But, faux does not like to OC above 1.4MHz IMO as it heats up so fast >1.4GHz it freezes.
Trinity will sustain itself much longer at >=1.5GHz much longer before the overheat freeze.
It is really hard to pick. IMO
Faux
Pros: Battery, OC in smaller steps possible, great performance in gaming environment (just one large single task), less SOD than trinity
Cons: Overheats quicker at OC, seems to panic more in multi task situations, more random reboots than Trinity
Trinity
Pros:Smoother multi taks performance, more stable at higher OC speeds, less random reboots than faux
Cons: Consumes more battery, less tweaking OC steps, more SODs than faux
I think it really comes down to personal use. These are just my experiences for my uses. Results vary.
Okay, i've to say... that is one of the best explaniations post of the kernels i've readed, so thanks you, i will stay with faux more time according what you say...
Thanks you
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
justjackyl said:
Well...I suppose this isn't devvin, but, I learned a little about build.prop modifications from the devs and experience on my Acer Iconia A100. Soooo, I decided to share a few tweaks that have made me notice some difference in performance.
Here is a cut of the lines I added into the build.prop:
============================================================================
# Added by justjackyl#
dalvik.vm.heapgrowthlimit=64m
dalvik.vm.heapstartsize=8m
debug.performance.tuning=1
net.tcp.buffersize.default=4096,87380,256960,4096, 16384,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.edge=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.gprs=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.umts=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
net.tcp.buffersize.wifi=4096,87380,256960,4096,163 84,256960
pm.sleep_mode=1
ro.config.nocheckin=1
ro.ril.disable.power.collapse=1
video.accelerate.hw=1
wifi.supplicant_scan_interval=180
windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=150
=============================================================
This should give a slight boost on overall responsiveness, video performance, slight memory performance to the dalvik VM, and decrease wirelesss canning to save battery, as well as boost wireless performance and throuput, as well as possible power saving across the board (only slight increase, say 5-10% MAX so don't expect huge savings!)
Anyone willing to test with me? These tweaks really pumped life into my Tegra 2 tablet, and seem to being doing the same, while being stable so far, on my G2x.
To use the mod, you just need to use a root access file browser, browse to system, rename the current build.prop to build.prop.bak and copy and paste in the build.prop.mod one. Just make sure whichever one you are using, it is named build.prop with no extensions, so rename build.prop.mod to build.prop, and same to restore your back up original.
Than boot into recovery, wipe cache and dalvik cache, reboot and good to go.
Your first couple reboot cycles may be slower than normal as dalvik cache is rebuilding.
File----> justjackyl's build.prop mod for G2x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These tweaks were posted 5-6 months back, and there is another thread for them too. They are fine, not a major improvement though.....
old thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1806868
5 hours of battery with always the screen on and using is good?
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
DankoFGL said:
5 hours of battery with always the screen on and using is good?
Enviado desde mi LG-P999 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your battery life is not due to these tweaks...I`ve tried them a long ago.Trust me on this one
BigDig said:
These tweaks were posted 5-6 months back, and there is another thread for them too. They are fine, not a major improvement though.....
old thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1806868
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That one is for stock GB 2.3.4, OP states.
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/ Trinity TD1.58 kernel (testing)
justjackyl said:
That one is for stock GB 2.3.4, OP states.
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/ Trinity TD1.58 kernel (testing)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you scroll the pages, they posted an cm7.2 buid prop also. The tweaks are fine, but nothing magnificent....
BigDig said:
If you scroll the pages, they posted an cm7.2 buid prop also. The tweaks are fine, but nothing magnificent....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh well. I tried.
Sometimes we overlook things on accident ...
Sent via G2x on temasek b135.2 w/ Trinity TD1.58 kernel (testing)
Related
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1020637
DON'T USE THE ROM, IT IS OUTDATED AND HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED!
DO NOT USE THE "PUV" (Pinky UnderVolt) VERSION, IT WILL CAUSE YOUR DEVICE TO GET STUCK AT THE SPLASHSCREEN! (POSSIBLY)
I DID NOT MAKE THIS KERNEL, I'M JUST POSTING IT HERE FOR YOU ALL.
THIS IS NOT FOR ANY OTHER ROMS BESIDES CM7 (AND CM7-BASED ROMS) AND MIUI, SO DON'T ASK!
I'm using the UUV CFS version. It is very fast and smooth, I urge you not to have an OC past 1.3GHz as a daily driver, unless you want horrible battery life.
Any option below PUV is safe (UUV, -50mV, and -25mV all work, but every device varies).
i didnt think my phone could ever sh*t itself until i flashed this kernal.
dethpikil said:
i didnt think my phone could ever sh*t itself until i flashed this kernal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i logged in just to ask you to decrypt that message. what does that mean? bad kernal?
vln004 said:
i logged in just to ask you to decrypt that message. what does that mean? bad kernal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, iffy kernal. especially with two versions available, its kinda strange testing them and seeing whats best for your phone. flashed the cfs version, and as expected, things seemed evenly smother throughout the phone, yet even at 1.99, there was nothing special or over the top about performance. also, i had a very strange, completely indescribable hiccup after booting.
EDIT
tried the bfs version, and still nothing special. maybe its just me and my miui rom. the 1.99 is cool, but i think im just gunna stay away from this.
Been running his kernels for a couple of weeks, no issues. It is nice to be able to choose from different undervolt versions. Helps battery life a little, around 5%-10% in my experience.
NikolaiT, just FYI this kernel works with Ultimate Droid, which is based on CM7. In case you want to update the OP.
henrybravo said:
NikolaiT, just FYI this kernel works with Ultimate Droid, which is based on CM7. In case you want to update the OP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Running 4.2 cfs -25 version on UD now. 4.0 was the best battery life ever on any cm7 based roms. Haven't tried the puv version yet, but rest assured I will try and report results..
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
dethpikil said:
lol, iffy kernal. especially with two versions available, its kinda strange testing them and seeing whats best for your phone. flashed the cfs version, and as expected, things seemed evenly smother throughout the phone, yet even at 1.99, there was nothing special or over the top about performance. also, i had a very strange, completely indescribable hiccup after booting.
EDIT
tried the bfs version, and still nothing special. maybe its just me and my miui rom. the 1.99 is cool, but i think im just gunna stay away from this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hardly "iffy", the differences are stated in the thread or here.
I've been using this kernel with CM7 Final for quite some time now and it's been quite solid.
rasroygbiv said:
+1. Running 4.2 cfs -25 version on UD now. 4.0 was the best battery life ever on any cm7 based roms. Haven't tried the puv version yet, but rest assured I will try and report results..
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Careful, the PUV version softbricked my device. Easily fixable through reflashing your ROM or just a new kernel.
It may not brick yours because some devices can handle it, some can't.
helushune said:
Hardly "iffy", the differences are stated in the thread or here.
I've been using this kernel with CM7 Final for quite some time now and it's been quite solid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. Not "iffy" at all.
I've been using it for a while now. At the moment I'm using the latest CFS -25 UV version @ 1305 with the scaling set to Intelligent Donkey (lol) and I actually made it an entire day without charging. That's saying a lot for someone that gets about 12 hours max on a charge.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
TheBassman369 said:
I've been using it for a while now. At the moment I'm using the latest CFS -25 UV version @ 1305 with the scaling set to Intelligent Donkey (lol) and I actually made it an entire day without charging. That's saying a lot for someone that gets about 12 hours max on a charge.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently pulling two days at 64% with the same kernel but my CPU settings are 122 min - 1075 max.
So what's everyone recommendations for the best version of this Kernel in terms of both optimum battery and performance?
Additionally... what kinds of CPU governors and max-min frequencies are you using? I've seen a few post what their using in this thread, but I'd like to get some more opinions.
I've been using this Kernel for a few weeks now with no issues. The UUV had some slight hesitation when scrolling so now I'm running 4.3 CFS with the -50 UV and it's absolutely perfect. Fantastic battery life running at 122/1305 MHz with the -50 UV.
i'm using 4.2 and I didn't flash any scripts... is the default -25UV? I'm gonna try 4.3 and -50 script later tonight.
quick question to the group: what is eating up your battery? mine, oddly enough is cell standby and phone idle. i'm using stock radio. in the past (on froyo builds), it's always been screen time.
substance12 said:
i'm using 4.2 and I didn't flash any scripts... is the default -25UV? I'm gonna try 4.3 and -50 script later tonight.
quick question to the group: what is eating up your battery? mine, oddly enough is cell standby and phone idle. i'm using stock radio. in the past (on froyo builds), it's always been screen time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Default is no undervoltage.
Cell Standby and Phone Idle are my two biggest "battery killers" but that's normal operation.
henrybravo said:
+1. Not "iffy" at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe all of you missed the whole miui thing. it says it works great with miui, but my phone seemed very buggy after switching from cattleprods kernel, but you tested it on very different roms than me. it addition, my quadrant score were crap on both types, cfs and bfs, which is completely contrary to the description of one over the other. so yes iffy.
Can anyone explain the difference between the scheduler flavors? I use cfs, but bfq or io?
dethpikil said:
maybe all of you missed the whole miui thing. it says it works great with miui, but my phone seemed very buggy after switching from cattleprods kernel, but you tested it on very different roms than me. it addition, my quadrant score were crap on both types, cfs and bfs, which is completely contrary to the description of one over the other. so yes iffy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure did. Pardon.
sugardaddy1979 said:
Can anyone explain the difference between the scheduler flavors? I use cfs, but bfq or io?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check these two posts: Post 1, Post 2. Looks like BFQ is the standard scheduler and VIO is quicker on paper (kind of like BFS vs CFS).
Thanks for the explanation. The bfqhs seems much smoother than the io. I am running it with the uuv.
How many ROMS have GPU acceleration enabled. Im running Android Revolution atm and I understand now how powerful GPU can be. I see virtually no lag in browser even in the longest website while doing pinch to zoom. Are there any other ROMS that have this kind of smoothness in browser? Let me know!!!
Question 2: My mytouch 4g lasts a while on a single charge. I browse for 2 hours andplay music 1 hour everyday and with wifi on about 5-6 hours I get 24-28 hours of battery on Mytouch. With Sensation Im barely getting 15 hours.
Whatever special features a rom has will be mentioned in the changelog or rom info page.
Although you didn't ask a second question, i'll assume you meant to ask if the battery life can be improved? I'd suggest flashing Bricked kernel (usually comes with ARHD) and not overclocking. Also turn data off when you're not using it...if you need longer battery life, i'd suggest buying an Evo 3D battery (fits the Sensation but more capacity) or purchasing a 1900 ma Ankar battery.
Hit Thanks if i've helped
In regards to your first question, you can actually enable GPU acceleration on ANY ROM by adding this line to your build.prop:
debug.sf.hw=1
These next two lines will help with smoothness:
video.accelerate.hw=1
debug.performance.tuning=1
Bada bing! Hope this helps
EDIT: Not sure if a stock kernel will work with these tweaks.. also, you MUST have a rooted device as you cannot edit the build.prop otherwise!
maff1989 said:
In regards to your first question, you can actually enable GPU acceleration on ANY ROM by adding this line to your build.prop:
debug.sf.hw=1
These next two lines will help with smoothness:
video.accelerate.hw=1
debug.performance.tuning=1
Bada bing! Hope this helps
EDIT: Not sure if a stock kernel will work with these tweaks.. also, you MUST have a rooted device as you cannot edit the build.prop otherwise!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is SO AWESOME!!! So wait what are the limitations for this tweak? Can this be used in Single core devices like Mytouch 4g or like Incredible or other phones in general?
So basically this is a general discussion or chit chatting for all of you about which governer is better ,best etc. I/O schedulers etc.
You can also ask question, queries about your current settings is it good and etc.
There are also three sections in this post too. Recommended settings by me, Tested ones. And also ones that I am testing. Those that I have tested have my remarks on them too
RECOMMENDED
Here are my recommended No-Frills CPU settings:
Max:1200
Min:300
Gov. InteractiveX(Gives a lot of performance boost and also battery friendly)
I/O: BFQ(Im now checking out other IO schedulers after found a good or better one i will update )(and also Because it fixes this issue.)
These are the setting that gives me the best/positive results on my unit. I do not OC as I see no obvious differences in speed as these settings are already more than good enough. And furthermore OC will decrease the life of the device so no point.
TESTED
I have tested these:
Max:1200
Min: 300
Gov: Smartassv2
IO: SIO
Remarks: I have tested these and I must say the performance and battery life was almost as good as those of the recommended settings These do perform almost the same as the recommended ones but battery wise is definitely an out for these if compared to the recommended one. I personally would still recommend and prefer those in the recommended section as both almost perform the same and this is more unbattery friendly.
TESTING
This are the settings that I am testing now:
Max: 1000
Min: 300
Gov: Conservative
IO: Noop
Remarks: So as usual, I will test and report back after about a week. As of now, performance wise, these really lose out to all the others that are present in this post. But battery wise its definitely a clear winner
SHORT VIDEO THAT I FOUND ON YOUTUBE
As usual, DO ANY CHANGES TO YOUR PHONE AT YOUR OWN RISK
Enjoy! And I hope that this thread has been helpful for you.
Reference: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1242323. Also, I believe many threads like this have been made . To me, everyone's experience is not entirely the same, therefore this would only help to a certain extend .
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
bscraze said:
Reference: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1242323. Also, I believe many threads like this have been made . To me, everyone's experience is not entirely the same, therefore this would only help to a certain extend .
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... havent really seen one around in I9003 forums tho. And seen alot of discussion about this in dev thread so...
crazbanditz said:
Hmmm... havent really seen one around in I9003 forums tho. And seen alot of discussion about this in dev thread so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just Google 'best governor'/best scheduler/best governor and scheduler.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
first i have to say that there are big differences in CPU-Tools... i got myself cpumaster,nofrills and finally setcpu... cpumaster made my phone laggy even with lionheartgovernors and stuff...nofrills has no support for different profiles...so i highly recommend invest the little mlney for the incredible setcpu. basically i use smartassV2 at 1000mhz min 300mhz with sio scheduler...and then much profiles like change to vr scheduler when playing videos or in call 600mhz max or at night when i sleel keep the phone at 300mhz max; )
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Hi. I was just wondering... Do Kernel Govs and I/O selections match well with V6 Supercharger? Or is it better to supercharge with a stock kernel?
Sorry for the noob question. Im just concerned if its possible that all these mods im applying might be cancelling out each other at some point... Or worse might be contradicting each other too...
Sent from my Galaxy SL with CM9A6, Vurrut Kernel v17 & V6 Supercharged.
hpog said:
Hi. I was just wondering... Do Kernel Govs and I/O selections match well with V6 Supercharger? Or is it better to supercharge with a stock kernel?
Sorry for the noob question. Im just concerned if its possible that all these mods im applying might be cancelling out each other at some point... Or worse might be contradicting each other too...
Sent from my Galaxy SL with CM9A6, Vurrut Kernel v17 & V6 Supercharged.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope they don't they do different things . Supercharger manages minfree values while governors and schedulers manage the CPU speed
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by Stable and Smooth CyanogenMod 9!
felixchris said:
first i have to say that there are big differences in CPU-Tools... i got myself cpumaster,nofrills and finally setcpu... cpumaster made my phone laggy even with lionheartgovernors and stuff...nofrills has no support for different profiles...so i highly recommend invest the little mlney for the incredible setcpu. basically i use smartassV2 at 1000mhz min 300mhz with sio scheduler...and then much profiles like change to vr scheduler when playing videos or in call 600mhz max or at night when i sleel keep the phone at 300mhz max; )
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm smart ass v2 has built in screen off profiles if I'm not wrong.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
bscraze said:
Umm smart ass v2 has built in screen off profiles if I'm not wrong.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-i9003 powered by RemICS S III-looking rom!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does
Updated op with testing status
Does oc to 1.1 ghz drains the same amount of battery as oc to 1.3ghz ?? Can i use screen off profile in set cpu with conservative 300 mhz max and 300 mhz min ?? will it drain battery or improve battery ???
anuraagkochar said:
Does oc to 1.1 ghz drains the same amount of battery as oc to 1.3ghz ?? Can i use screen off profile in set cpu with conservative 300 mhz max and 300 mhz min ?? will it drain battery or improve battery ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my recommendation for SetCPU max 1200 min 300 gov interactiveX io:BFQ When asleep profile: Max 600 min 300 gov and io same as above
Press thanks if this helped
Updated OP with alot of changes Including the new section guide and also the tested section as well as remarks to help people with choosing their settings
Gv smartassv2 Io sio
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
juanra88 said:
Gv smartassv2 Io sio
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ermmmm... Sorry why are you saying that all of a suddden?
Press Thanks if I helped
In my opinion, this topic is kinda useless.
I know and i respect your effort, but these settings really depend on the user and how they use the device.
If i try the same settings and try it myself, i will probably have another opinion and other results.
Benchmarks mean nothing.
Also many other threads all over XDA were made to explain governors and I/O schedulers, and users can simply Google it and read, then chose what suits them.
Skander1998 said:
In my opinion, this topic is kinda useless.
I know and i respect your effort, but these settings really depend on the user and how they use the device.
If i try the same settings and try it myself, i will probably have another opinion and other results.
Benchmarks mean nothing.
Also many other threads all over XDA were made to explain governors and I/O schedulers, and users can simply Google it and read, then chose what suits them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea... but this is particularly for our device and I did do a remarks section to what is better for performance and battery. So that the user will better know which one suits them I didnt mention anything about benchmarks... right?
Press Thanks if I helped
crazbanditz said:
Yea... but this is particularly for our device and I did do a remarks section to what is better for performance and battery. So that the user will better know which one suits them I didnt mention anything about benchmarks... right?
Press Thanks if I helped
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmarks note was for other people, it's in another line
Also, it doesn't matter if it's for our device or not, the topic give YOU the best results, others will probably have to test themselves, so i still see no point in this.
However, i am just saying my opinion, good luck
Skander1998 said:
The benchmarks note was for other people, it's in another line
Also, it doesn't matter if it's for our device or not, the topic give YOU the best results, others will probably have to test themselves, so i still see no point in this.
However, i am just saying my opinion, good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. But it will still save people from going off topic in devs thread...
which kernel r u using? bam v14 doesnt have interactivex !!
So I have not much time to experiment with Kernels rights now. I have tried thomas.rains and Dagr8's kernel.
From people's experience. Which of the three Kernels (I forgot to mention flapjaxx) do you think gives better battery life in idle state and screen on state? I know on Dagr8 in Badass governor, I have been getting 18 hours with medium use and 20% battery remaining. I just flashed thomas.raines kernel today, so I will test out the battery performance with my daily use.
No best threads allowed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
I've recently started using the Lightning Zap! kernel as part of the Nibbles ROM. It doesn't have as many governor choices as some other kernels, but I've found it thus far to be solid and with fantastic battery performance.
xcrazydx said:
No best threads allowed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot about that. Does the re-wording work?
Wallcrawler77 said:
I've recently started using the Lightning Zap! kernel as part of the Nibbles ROM. It doesn't have as many governor choices as some other kernels, but I've found it thus far to be solid and with fantastic battery performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great. I help others can get back. How did it compare with other kernels?
Edit** I realized how vague this questions was. In terms of performance and battery life, do you think it is better?
I know each kernel has it's strength and weakness, but just strictly in terms that I will not overclock and I want the best battery life and best performance, which kernel do you think give the whole package?
In also installed Nibble a couple of days ago, two kernel options, can't remember the exact name of the kernel I chose, it had a Zap in it, and it was version 3.
I had used Sean's on ICS, and was going to go to Sean's JB, but I started reading threads and liked what I read about this ROM.
It is the most stable ROM I've ever installed, and with the clock slowed down to 1,026, conservative governor and other power tweaks, I'm getting the best battery life I've ever gotten on any rom on this phone.
Very Very pleased. Install and donate!
jee'sgalaxy said:
That's great. I help others can get back. How did it compare with other kernels?
Edit** I realized how vague this questions was. In terms of performance and battery life, do you think it is better?
I know each kernel has it's strength and weakness, but just strictly in terms that I will not overclock and I want the best battery life and best performance, which kernel do you think give the whole package?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my experience the kernel doesn't make THAT much difference with battery life. I manage mine through controlling what's allowed to sync, disabling refresh in social apps, etc. The Lightning Zap kernel does a good balance of perf/batt without any need to tweak anything, but you can always try the KO kernel instead and tweak the governors, etc to your heart's content.
Sent from my A500 using xda app-developers app
I reported this thread best threads are not allowed here
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Their threads are full of opinions. Search for topic words to find out, test and make your opinion. Locked
I have seen people report about 71k score in antutu. The maximum i have ever got is 68k with modified thermal configuration. Is there any other modification (kernel - wise or not) to be done so that I can get the maximum performance out of my mi4c?
Edit: Using miui.eu 6.1.28
They probably make a cold run with disabled thermal config to have better benchmark, not worth it...
sMiui is actually using the best thermal config for me, and i get 69k on first run, then results stabilize at 55k...
There is big (performance, smoothness, stability...) difference between stock miui (from en.miui.com) and custom miui roms?
Ümit said:
There is big (performance, smoothness, stability...) difference between stock miui (from en.miui.com) and custom miui roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xiaomi.eu roms (on which sMiui roms are based) are debloated and optimized a little, so you can expect better performance, not great things, but is worth it...
ice-it said:
They probably make a cold run with disabled thermal config to have better benchmark, not worth it...
sMiui is actually using the best thermal config for me, and i get 69k on first run, then results stabilize at 55k...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks a lot!
Any kernel settings tweaked?