Modifications for performance - Xiaomi Mi 4C

I have seen people report about 71k score in antutu. The maximum i have ever got is 68k with modified thermal configuration. Is there any other modification (kernel - wise or not) to be done so that I can get the maximum performance out of my mi4c?
Edit: Using miui.eu 6.1.28

They probably make a cold run with disabled thermal config to have better benchmark, not worth it...
sMiui is actually using the best thermal config for me, and i get 69k on first run, then results stabilize at 55k...

There is big (performance, smoothness, stability...) difference between stock miui (from en.miui.com) and custom miui roms?

Ümit said:
There is big (performance, smoothness, stability...) difference between stock miui (from en.miui.com) and custom miui roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xiaomi.eu roms (on which sMiui roms are based) are debloated and optimized a little, so you can expect better performance, not great things, but is worth it...

ice-it said:
They probably make a cold run with disabled thermal config to have better benchmark, not worth it...
sMiui is actually using the best thermal config for me, and i get 69k on first run, then results stabilize at 55k...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks a lot!

Any kernel settings tweaked?

Related

[Q] CROMI-X benchmark low?

I recently flashed CROMI-X, and I'm loving it so far; huge improvement over stock, thanks to all involved! A quick question, though: I've been running the Quadrant benchmark, and averaging around 4400. That's a big improvement over stock, but seems quite a bit lower than any scores I see posted here; could I have messed anything up during the install, missed an important setting, ticked the wrong box, anything like that?
zarquon7 said:
I recently flashed CROMI-X, and I'm loving it so far; huge improvement over stock, thanks to all involved! A quick question, though: I've been running the Quadrant benchmark, and averaging around 4400. That's a big improvement over stock, but seems quite a bit lower than any scores I see posted here; could I have messed anything up during the install, missed an important setting, ticked the wrong box, anything like that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A couple of questions here:
What Kernel did you install?
What speed do you have your CPU set at? (Assuming you installed one of the overclock kernels)
pastorbob62 said:
A couple of questions here:
What Kernel did you install?
What speed do you have your CPU set at? (Assuming you installed one of the overclock kernels)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_that's kernel, v4, so, no overclock...
zarquon7 said:
_that's kernel, v4, so, no overclock...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, if you don't have overclocking, you won't reach the benchmark results posted.
But then it is all about usability, so if you are happy, no reason to chance damaging your device by overclocking.
Sent from my TF300T using Tapatalk
zarquon7 said:
_that's kernel, v4, so, no overclock...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are content with the functionality then stick with that. But if you are experiencing lag and sluggish performance then an oc'ed kernel is the only option you have to give it a boost.
I ran CROMi-X with Hundsbauh's kernel for a year, updating with each new version. I never experienced any problems while running oc'ed and the performance was great. Hundsbauh's includes an app where you can tweak the clock speeds for both the CPU and the GPU. e.g. I set my Balanced Mode to 1500 Mhz / 484Mhz and ran that way most of the time with no issues. It was a nice balance between performance and battery life.
That said, each device is different and your results may vary, but you should be safe using CROMi-X with Hundsbauh's kernel set to a reasonable overclock. It won't let you go higher than 1700 Mhz / 520 Mhz.
pastorbob62 said:
If you are content with the functionality then stick with that. But if you are experiencing lag and sluggish performance then an oc'ed kernel is the only option you have to give it a boost.
I ran CROMi-X with Hundsbauh's kernel for a year, updating with each new version. I never experienced any problems while running oc'ed and the performance was great. Hundsbauh's includes an app where you can tweak the clock speeds for both the CPU and the GPU. e.g. I set my Balanced Mode to 1500 Mhz / 484Mhz and ran that way most of the time with no issues. It was a nice balance between performance and battery life.
That said, each device is different and your results may vary, but you should be safe using CROMi-X with Hundsbauh's kernel set to a reasonable overclock. It won't let you go higher than 1700 Mhz / 520 Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After my original post, I tried switching to _that v7, and saw a nice bump in performance, though I'm not sure exactly what it's overclocking it to; I may try Hundsbuah's kernel, I like the idea of tweaking the speeds myself. I had been under the impression that _that's was a bit more stable, but it seems many people use Hundsbuah's without issues.

Best ROM for Game performance and multitasking?

So I want to know the best combination of a ROM and Kernel that would really improve gaming on the moto g 3rd gen and also be good with multiple apps open. The battery has do be good enough as I still want a decent battery life because after all It's going to be my daily driver.
I also prefer a CM rom since I love the CM theme engine and I do not like OMS or Layers.
current nightly CM13 is snappy, i dont know about other roms
I've gone through many of them. RR (vatsal) is my preference. Fire kernel. Best IMO
theoctavist said:
I've gone through many of them. RR (vatsal) is my preference. Fire kernel. Best IMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any specific kernel settings and which fire kernel version? Im on RR but not vatsals but im willing to switch. Ur on 7.3?
ROM should mostly be irrelevant here, any stable one should be fine... Kernel will make the difference. For smooth gaming use an OC kernel, but it will be at the expense of battery life. You won't gain significant performance and battery life, it's one way or the other, battery life at the expense of performance or vis-versa.
Sent from my Motorola XT1575 using XDA Labs
RedXYT5 said:
Do you have any specific kernel settings and which fire kernel version? Im on RR but not vatsals but im willing to switch. Ur on 7.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Latest RR. Lionfish , zram 1000 2 cores active, alucard, min 200 in GPU. Fire kernel. 128/256

Best Kernel

What do you guys think of the best Kernel for our Oneplus 6?
For me it seems like the Flash Kernel works the best but i would like to hear your opinions
Edit:
I listed my Stuff in an Excel Spreadsheet, currently running Radioactive.
Obviously each kernel is unique in its blood sweat and tears. Just try them all and leave em on for a few weeks. Usually the older toolchains have better battery and more stability in my testing. The benefit of certain kernels are exculsive CPU scaling governors modded by the developer. Currently running pappschlumpf's Smurfkernel with smurfutil battery profile spectrum on havoc nightly. I look for stability though and for stock OOS all kernels run pretty solid. One thing you need to be sure is that the kernel manager is locking frequencies otherwise I find a kernel that allows this. Lately I've had some trouble on blu kernel
Stoowyguy said:
Obviously each kernel is unique in its blood sweat and tears. Just try them all and leave em on for a few weeks. Usually the older toolchains have better battery and more stability in my testing. The benefit of certain kernels are exculsive CPU scaling governors modded by the developer. Currently running pappschlumpf's Smurfkernel with smurfutil battery profile spectrum on havoc nightly. I look for stability though and for stock OOS all kernels run pretty solid. One thing you need to be sure is that the kernel manager is locking frequencies otherwise I find a kernel that allows this. Lately I've had some trouble on blu kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive tested Stock, Elemental X, Franco and Flash Kernel in Idle Drain per Hour and Antutu Score
and Flash got almost as much as Stock in Antutu while only using 2.9% per hour
100% radioactive kernel
[Updated Main Post]

which kernel do you use and why?

Which kernel do you use and why?
senny22 said:
Which kernel do you use and why?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ElementalX on Oreo and now one Pie too.... Because its VERY STABLE.... THE MOST STABLE AND BEST KERNEL IN MY CHOICE... used FrancoKernel, Radioactive, Smurf and Flash kernels too.... But came back to ElementalX because of EX kernel manager app.... Tested all availble kernels so far...like in two words... Franco is good for battery and overall, Radioactive is Fast, Smurf is also stable, Flash is the fastest so far... Good with antutu with 290000 overall score.... But do you even need that little much speed in games when you have a BEAST.... ITS YOUR CHOICE.... WHAT TO CHOOSE.... and one last words... Smurf is supporting spectrum... But never used that.... FRANCOKERNELS app is also good there are many battery and performance tweaks like spectrum., If you know what am i talking about, Radioactive has its own magisk module with preloaded settings to be more fast and battery effective.... But when you know what is DYNAMIC STUNE BOOST... TOUCHBOOST, GOVERNORS,i/o scheduler and fsync you better to use ElementalX.... because if you know what this settings are for you can reach to best performance and battery life with your own... And be stable too.... I think i helped you eith your choice.... And yes.... You can test it all by your own and make your own decisions... Cause this is ONLY MY DECISIONS.... GOOD LUCK
ExKernel are the best
Envoyé de mon ONEPLUS A6003 en utilisant Tapatalk
James Blode said:
ElementalX on Oreo and now one Pie too.... Because its VERY STABLE.... THE MOST STABLE AND BEST KERNEL IN MY CHOICE... used FrancoKernel, Radioactive, Smurf and Flash kernels too.... But came back to ElementalX because of EX kernel manager app.... Tested all availble kernels so far...like in two words... Franco is good for battery and overall, Radioactive is Fast, Smurf is also stable, Flash is the fastest so far... Good with antutu with 290000 overall score.... But do you even need that little much speed in games when you have a BEAST.... ITS YOUR CHOICE.... WHAT TO CHOOSE.... and one last words... Smurf is supporting spectrum... But never used that.... FRANCOKERNELS app is also good there are many battery and performance tweaks like spectrum., If you know what am i talking about, Radioactive has its own magisk module with preloaded settings to be more fast and battery effective.... But when you know what is DYNAMIC STUNE BOOST... TOUCHBOOST, GOVERNORS,i/o scheduler and fsync you better to use ElementalX.... because if you know what this settings are for you can reach to best performance and battery life with your own... And be stable too.... I think i helped you eith your choice.... And yes.... You can test it all by your own and make your own decisions... Cause this is ONLY MY DECISIONS.... GOOD LUCK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers man
senny22 said:
Cheers man
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XD thats it....
James Blode said:
ElementalX on Oreo and now one Pie too.... Because its VERY STABLE.... THE MOST STABLE AND BEST KERNEL IN MY CHOICE... used FrancoKernel, Radioactive, Smurf and Flash kernels too.... But came back to ElementalX because of EX kernel manager app.... Tested all availble kernels so far...like in two words... Franco is good for battery and overall, Radioactive is Fast, Smurf is also stable, Flash is the fastest so far... Good with antutu with 290000 overall score.... But do you even need that little much speed in games when you have a BEAST.... ITS YOUR CHOICE.... WHAT TO CHOOSE.... and one last words... Smurf is supporting spectrum... But never used that.... FRANCOKERNELS app is also good there are many battery and performance tweaks like spectrum., If you know what am i talking about, Radioactive has its own magisk module with preloaded settings to be more fast and battery effective.... But when you know what is DYNAMIC STUNE BOOST... TOUCHBOOST, GOVERNORS,i/o scheduler and fsync you better to use ElementalX.... because if you know what this settings are for you can reach to best performance and battery life with your own... And be stable too.... I think i helped you eith your choice.... And yes.... You can test it all by your own and make your own decisions... Cause this is ONLY MY DECISIONS.... GOOD LUCK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What settings is there even there to configure?
On EX the default is pretty solid as it is. And then throw in the contents from the second post of his thread of setting stune boost from 10-20 and disable touchboost and that's about it.
James Blode said:
ElementalX on Oreo and now one Pie too.... Because its VERY STABLE.... THE MOST STABLE AND BEST KERNEL IN MY CHOICE... used FrancoKernel, Radioactive, Smurf and Flash kernels too.... But came back to ElementalX because of EX kernel manager app.... Tested all availble kernels so far...like in two words... Franco is good for battery and overall, Radioactive is Fast, Smurf is also stable, Flash is the fastest so far... Good with antutu with 290000 overall score.... But do you even need that little much speed in games when you have a BEAST.... ITS YOUR CHOICE.... WHAT TO CHOOSE.... and one last words... Smurf is supporting spectrum... But never used that.... FRANCOKERNELS app is also good there are many battery and performance tweaks like spectrum., If you know what am i talking about, Radioactive has its own magisk module with preloaded settings to be more fast and battery effective.... But when you know what is DYNAMIC STUNE BOOST... TOUCHBOOST, GOVERNORS,i/o scheduler and fsync you better to use ElementalX.... because if you know what this settings are for you can reach to best performance and battery life with your own... And be stable too.... I think i helped you eith your choice.... And yes.... You can test it all by your own and make your own decisions... Cause this is ONLY MY DECISIONS.... GOOD LUCK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which stune settings do you use?
Also even I use ElementalX kernel.
RazorBlade123 said:
Which stune settings do you use?
Also even I use ElementalX kernel.[/QUDynamic Stunde boost is 20 and top app schedtune boost is set to 1....touchboost is off and input boost is also off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just shifted from EX to blu spark, finding it to be more battery friendly ?

which kernel is best for gaming whyred?#RN5PRO

I don't care really about battery just need those extra fps! For gaming only
(pubg)
Which whyred kernel has the highest benchmark score?
Miui 10(only for internal audio!)
Stock kernel
Please use the search function to find similar previous threads instead of making new ones. In general, if you still didnt find relevant answers then you may reword and repost with what you couldn't find in them but need specifically.
There is no kernel that will give you the power of the 845.
Exactly for what game do you want the extra fps?
The Restless Soul said:
There is no kernel that will give you the power of the 845.
Exactly for what game do you want the extra fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pubg
ItsOm said:
Pubg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You expect 60 fps on a midrange cpu?
ItsOm said:
I don't care really about battery just need those extra fps! For gaming only
(pubg)
Which whyred kernel has the highest benchmark score?
Miui 10(only for internal audio!)
Stock kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Set the Cpu governor to Performance and ask for good values to adjust the Gpu.
Best to use a Custom kernel like Insigniux or Agni.
Make profiles with Kernel aduitor for Performance and stock values
You won't see big differences but some extra fps should be possible.
Even with OC or something there won't be so much more power wich really could be of use (just much higher battery drain)
Hope that helps a bit. :fingers-crossed:

Categories

Resources