I dont know why !!!! - Samsung Galaxy SL i9003

I am really thinking why our device in the in the " Low and Lagency Devices " section.
And i saw that samsung galaxy 3 (applo) and some other phone in the main section. As applo has a ics and jb whice is more buggy than our phone. And it is a bit cheaper than our sl. Anyone has an idea of this. Or atleast ifour phone have a stable ics or jb and a kernel 3.X it must be on the main section.
Thanks.
And sorry if this thread should not be there

Mebin Robin said:
I am really thinking why our device in the in the " Low and Lagency Devices " section.
And i saw that samsung galaxy 3 (applo) and some other phone in the main section. As applo has a ics and jb whice is more buggy than our phone. And it is a bit cheaper than our sl. Anyone has an idea of this. Or atleast ifour phone have a stable ics or jb and a kernel 3.X it must be on the main section.
Thanks.
And sorry if this thread should not be there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our phone activity is low compared to the Apollo. I have been in the galaxy 3 community for very long and the activity there is easily twice of ours. It doesn't mean better development means you will not be in the legacy and low activity devices. This has been brought up many times and when the time is ripe(or in this case when we have enough activity), we will be moved out.

Does it means we need more devs...
DONT FORGET TO PRESS THE THANKS BUTTON IF HELPED YOU IN ANY WAY

^^ No. It means we need more people to buy this phone and then register and be active on XDA.

That is what i mean !!!
DONT FORGET TO PRESS THE THANKS BUTTON IF HELPED YOU IN ANY WAY

Mebin Robin said:
Does it means we need more devs...
DONT FORGET TO PRESS THE THANKS BUTTON IF HELPED YOU IN ANY WAY
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We need more member with more developers.

We need more devs BUT to get out of legacy and low activity what we need is more members, not devs

Related

Porting i9000 gingerbread to i9003

Hi all , as the title says is there any way to port gingerbread to i9003?
What are all the changes that have to be done in the gingerbread rom to make it work with i9003?
Can we take the drivers for i9000 from its original firmware and merge it with gingerbread.
I know if we flash the wrong firmware it wont go past the samsung logo. But what is making it to stop there??
1.Hardware Drivers?.
2.Phone model conflict.?
Post your ideas and opinions.....
I don't think it would be possible, not without ALOT of work anyway. I think I remember 'curio tweeting about it having completely different hardware, although I could well be wrong...
Curio only said that the audio hadware is different. Why cant we remove the drivers of i9000 from that gingerbread rom and replace it with i9003 drivers. May be it is easy to say but hard to achieve, i want to take some initial steps towards it...
Any guidance from developers will be helpful
We need some experienced developers to start this or else wait for official version from samsung.
bala_gamer said:
Curio only said that the audio hadware is different. Why cant we remove the drivers of i9000 from that gingerbread rom and replace it with i9003 drivers. May be it is easy to say but hard to achieve, i want to take some initial steps towards it...
Any guidance from developers will be helpful
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not just that. you guys have a different cpu/gpu too.
Ya the CPU/GPU/CHIPSET/AUDIO are different, but we have all the required drivers and files in the i9003 original rom file. WHy cant we replace those in the gingerbread rom. I may be wrong , but its not at all impossible.
You make it sound so easy. You can't just replace the drivers with i9003 ones without editing the software to be compatible with the new drivers. Just wait for gingerbread
Galaxy S - no point in writing rom or kernel constantly changing!
The linux kernel in Gingerbread is different. That's why drivers from old kernel can be incompatible. Also we don't have sources to compile new drivers.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
None of the developers are interested in this phone. In spite of consistent requests we have not been provided a separate section at XDA. Either Admin does not like this phone or they are waiting for some developer to take initiative. Even the cheapest phone has a development thread within a short period of its release. May be its a fate of I9003 users.
I think that all because the phone is available in specific countriea bot widly spread
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA Premium App
trip007in said:
None of the developers are interested in this phone. In spite of consistent requests we have not been provided a separate section at XDA. Either Admin does not like this phone or they are waiting for some developer to take initiative. Even the cheapest phone has a development thread within a short period of its release. May be its a fate of I9003 users.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been said before buy the devs a few phones they cannot work on something they have not got .They do not get paid to work on giving you a nice rom .
So please donate at least one I9003 .
jje
I heard that we have to donate a mobile of the same model to xda so that the developers will start their work. is that true?
What do you do when you come home from work ??
Go out and buy a phone you dont want and start development work on it for no money as a hobby ??? . To give away to unknown persons .
Devs are people that work on stuff for free its a hobby not a job .
Personally if i was able to do all that development stuff i would be looking at the SGS 2 now .
jje
JJEgan said:
What do you do when you come home from work ??
Go out and buy a phone you dont want and start development work on it for no money as a hobby ??? . To give away to unknown persons .
Devs are people that work on stuff for free its a hobby not a job .
Personally if i was able to do all that development stuff i would be looking at the SGS 2 now .
jje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be what you are saying is right, but what is stopping XDA admin to provide us a separate section for I9003? Atleast we will have some hope seeing our own section... How can ppl reach a developer at a forum where we do not even know who is a developer here? Why will somebody even show interest in the development of the device which is not listed??? that can be another reason. Its need to be popular for someone to be attracted. When I want to read posts related to my device here, I have search through 100s of I9000 posts, I have to search my own post in the forum, it goes untraceable. What do you think about this? do you think we need to donate the phone to XDA moderators too to create a section?
@JJE, do you mind telling us which phone do you own?
@trip
If I remember correctly jje has a SGS.
He is one of the most helpful people around. I have read his posts in different phone's sections and found them to be helpful and motivating.
Even here his suggestion is practical.
All those wonderful people who develop for SGS (darky, curio,etc) own that device. We need to have developers from within our own group only first. Others could chip in and help us.
Ok then lets donate a phone to darky or some reputed developer and ask to help us. But my point is we need separate section for the phone for all the developments posts and attract other developers. Its easy for some ppl to donate when they gain some thing in return, I mean to continue the development support.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
@trip
Agreed and true
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
@ rex and @ trip
Contacted a moderator via mail. For getting a separate section for our mobile he says we have to keep on requesting in the "Android General" forum. Once there is 1000+ requests, they will decide about a new sub forum.
@bala, lets do it then.
trip007in said:
@bala, lets do it then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Post daily in that request thread & all i9003 users add that thread link in your signature that way all new users will get to see that thread & will post request to cross 1000s post mark soon. Next 10-15 days we should have it done.
What do you say?

What will be a suitable time for our forum to move away from here with old devices?

I want to ask the moderator for my serveral concern.
1. What is the criteria for being a forum on top or to be list in compact view? Is it about the number of post? No. The number of posts in our android development part is great in number, even more than the phone I am using now HTC sensation and no need to say about galaxy mini ,ace or moto atrix.
2. Is it about the number of Roms? surely not also! We have quite a number of ROMs although most of them are edited from stock ROM, but the number of developers are also quite enough for being a phone on top . The number of themes, mods, tweaks are so many as well.
3. Is it concern about the update frequency ? Again it is a mistake .our forum update frequency is on the top level. About 100 new posts appeared everyday. Is that an enormous number? Not quite, comparing with galaxy s2. But I think it is quite a number comparing with other phones like HTC Evo3d or Samsung galaxy captivate.
4. Is the phone not popular enough? No! Our phone is one of the most popular phone in Asia. With cheap price and relatively high spec, the number of user is still increasing. As I know in China and my city Hong Kong, the number of user of i9003 is more than I9000!
5. Slow official update, no CM, no miui, I9003 don't deserve a place on top.
Well maybe we don't have miui is a fact. But we can see that the speed for Samsung to update the firmware about our phone is suddenly in an incredible speed. So slow official update is not a matter. Many phone on top page even loses the promise to update to gingerbread from their manufacturer! Is that a reason don't let us to be on top? Our cyanogenmod is now developing! Maybe our cm developing stage is slow but at least we are doing! Is that reasonable ?
I hope the moderator can gave the answer to us as soon as possible. I hope the mods can provide us a schedule about what is the criteria and when can we be on top.
I know I am no longer an I9003 user. But I am still a member of the community, the business of I9003, is the business of mine!
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e with Beats Audio using XDA Premium App
superb buddy...same thing was going in my mind from so many days...
I'm not sure, let me me see what I can find out.
I think our community is now mature enough and we should take action now to request the moderator to promote us to a new position.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA Premium App
+1
same ques
now its up to the cool n everhelping xda mods to ans
agreeing with you fxzy
It's strange that I didn't see this post at the November.
I agree with all your words in your topic. Strange that we are still in the "Legacy & Low Activity Devices". Because both these parts are not true for our device.
We need to break free from this low activity forums!
Tapashocked via my gt-I9003 with a random keyboard of my choice !
Lordrdx666 said:
We need to break free from this low activity forums!
Tapashocked via my gt-I9003 with a random keyboard of my choice !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya.. No doubt.. Never understood why we were placed in " low activity" in the first place..
ivAnash said:
Ya.. No doubt.. Never understood why we were placed in " low activity" in the first place..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It still looks like low activity to me. We've had our own section for a few months now and none of the 4 forums have cracked 500 threads...
jamsori said:
It still looks like low activity to me. We've had our own section for a few months now and none of the 4 forums have cracked 500 threads...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is that the requirement to be considered high activity? quick, get some more useless threads open so we can reach 500!
j/k
so what are all the requirements to no longer be considered "low activity"?
i think this device belongs here,bcoz after all,its a "legacy device".......living under the shadow of its bigger brother ,the i9000
sakindia123 said:
i think this device belongs here,bcoz after all,its a "legacy device".......living under the shadow of its bigger brother ,the i9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I9003 is a legacy, but why galaxy s 4G can live separately with i9000? Galaxy S 4G is more similar to i9000, but they still get a separate forum on the top.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA Premium App
fxzy said:
If I9003 is a legacy, but why galaxy s 4G can live separately with i9000? Galaxy S 4G is more similar to i9000, but they still get a separate forum on the top.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's the problem.....its the same with AT&T ,and T-Mobile variants of galaxy s2(they have just got a .2 inch bigger screen!)
they give separate forums for these devices which are released in the US...after all ,the core moderator commiittee are Americans!
since the i9003 wasnt released in the US,hence the situation!
supergaijin said:
is that the requirement to be considered high activity? quick, get some more useless threads open so we can reach 500!
j/k
so what are all the requirements to no longer be considered "low activity"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL
sakindia123 said:
they give separate forums for these devices which are released in the US...after all ,the core moderator commiittee are Americans!
since the i9003 wasnt released in the US,hence the situation!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's all cry racism...
Settle down. It's a popular device, just not on XDA.
Anything?????
Hey cant we do anything.....contact to mods....any solutions..not predictions...something we could do.......something??????
We want to SL forum part be improved, the current situation is unacceptable and represent discrimination!
I invite all SL owners to write in this topic and ask same thing!
We need to rise!
maxoooo said:
We want to SL forum part be improved, the current situation is unacceptable and represent discrimination!
I invite all SL owners to write in this topic and ask same thing!
We need to rise!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what would be improved if our forum was relocated from the low activity section? is it just a feeling of happiness that you're no longer considered low activity? yes, I have this phone, but no, I don't really care which section we're in as long as it's working fine. I will say that being a sub-forum of the i9000 was a bit hard, especially for organization of information, but whether we're "low-" or "high-activity" makes no difference as far as I see. please explain the improvements we'd see...
jamsori said:
It still looks like low activity to me. We've had our own section for a few months now and none of the 4 forums have cracked 500 threads...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jamsori said:
Settle down. It's a popular device, just not on XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
supergaijin said:
what would be improved if our forum was relocated from the low activity section? is it just a feeling of happiness that you're no longer considered low activity? yes, I have this phone, but no, I don't really care which section we're in as long as it's working fine. I will say that being a sub-forum of the i9000 was a bit hard, especially for organization of information, but whether we're "low-" or "high-activity" makes no difference as far as I see. please explain the improvements we'd see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't only agree with you guys, the popularity of i9003 won't change now, and be here or elsewhere won't change anything to the situation.
Tottaly agree with you like the others. It's about time we were put in the proper place.

[Req][Port]Doctorz Rom XXJVT

Hay guys it Dr.Ali here i know this is not a right place to post this thread but i need someone who can port the our Doctorz Rom to Captivate......we made this rom for Samsung Galaxy S and S2(coming soon) and we ported this also on Samsung Infuse 4G and now i need someone who can port this.
here is my original thread for Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1263994
if anyone interested plz let me know.
IlluminatedOne said:
Why not? Its his own ROM and he is looking for Devs who are willing to port his ROM to captivate!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And this is a rom I'd be most willing to try out.
b-eock said:
Switch the modem, kernel, and use the button fix.zip
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you expect someone who doesnt even own a captivate to know this? its good that captivate is still getting some love from devs. you could avoid scaring them away..
@OP what have you done in your rom to give it "long battery life"?
First of all sorry i also know thats annoying and for those i have no captivate phone so i didnt test it and i am also busy with 3 phones rom......so thanks and appreciate the efforts guys......thanks
also don't forget the buttons light up on screen touch fix. Optionally for the extra mile, remove traces to video calling. for kernel, pick a jvt kernel from this forum and it handles 180 and home key button mapping. that leaves you to apply haptic fix on home key and the above functions.
You get this rom worked out and i will try it. We need all the captivate roms we can get. Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
Thread closed until I can get to a desktop and really see this.
Ok, now I've seen it. Really? This guy wants to have someone port his ROM to the Captivate, he asks for development help in the development forum (I'm moving it to General, where it really belongs until actual development takes place) , and he gets bashed for it? All you would have had to do was report the thread as being in the wrong forum, I would have moved it. Really, there's no need for the flaming, namecalling and insults I see here. If your post is gone, think about it....there were a few defenders whose posts are also gone to remove the discussion. Now carry on on topic.
Thread moved and reopened.
reinbeau said:
Thread closed until I can get to a desktop and really see this.
Ok, now I've seen it. Really? This guy wants to have someone port his ROM to the Captivate, he asks for development help in the development forum (I'm moving it to General, where it really belongs until actual development takes place) , and he gets bashed for it? All you would have had to do was report the thread as being in the wrong forum, I would have moved it. Really, there's no need for the flaming, namecalling and insults I see here. If your post is gone, think about it....there were a few defenders whose posts are also gone to remove the discussion. Now carry on on topic.
Thread moved and reopened.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Reinbeau........
that only for s2 and infuse
ali_khalid5518 said:
Hay guys it Dr.Ali here i know this is not a right place to post this thread but i need someone who can port the our Doctorz Rom to Captivate......we made this rom for Samsung Galaxy S and S2(coming soon) and we ported this also on Samsung Infuse 4G and now i need someone who can port this.
here is my original thread for Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1263994
if anyone interested plz let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not a huge under taking to port it to captivate...grab a reoriented kernel.
Remap the buttons so the home key works, fix a couple smali's (one in services.jar to make the capacitive buttons light when you touch the screen, and one in the Android.policy.jar to fix home haptic feedback)
Video call references are optional, not usable on captivate but won't hurt anything if left in. (unless you try to use it then it will FC of course)
Shouldn't take too long to do it yourself... I'll give it a go but i'm busy til Friday, so if you wanna try first go ahead

Official samsung firmware 2.3.4 port from galaxy fit

hello,
im gonna port android 2.3 from galaxy fit..
the only thing i need to know is how could i change the RESOLUTION FROM 240X320 TO 204X400 like ours.. please assist me and i would do it
the galaxy fit has lower specs than ours so see gsmarena for specs
so our phone should run it 100% so please help me if needed
anxdateamcool said:
hello,
im gonna port android 2.3 from galaxy fit..
the only thing i need to know is how could i change the RESOLUTION FROM 240X320 TO 204X400 like ours.. please assist me and i would do it
the galaxy fit has lower specs than ours so see gsmarena for specs
so our phone should run it 100% so please help me if needed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry im not gonna port from galaxy fit, but im gonna port from galaxy 551 for resolution probs hope it completes successfully
anxdateamcool said:
sorry im not gonna port from galaxy fit, but im gonna port from galaxy 551 for resolution probs hope it completes successfully
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with 10 touch point support???
Sent from my hybrid g3
Kyrillos' 9.0.5 powered by
g3mod 2.1 Final OC
rkkoby said:
with 10 touch point support???
Sent from my hybrid g3
Kyrillos' 9.0.5 powered by
g3mod 2.1 Final OC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for 10 point touch support, i need the help of "unreal3000" probably he would help me i think
anxdateamcool said:
for 10 point touch support, i need the help of "unreal3000" probably he would help me i think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it that the people having membership=senior member and thanks meter=above 1000 should only do this ,
1. Stop spamming the forum, don't open useless threads here and there.
2. The thing you wanna do isnt possible
Each phone has its own specific firmware, and firmware made for one phone wont run on the other, and may also damage the phone
Porting firmware needs a lot of knowledge, you need to do lot more than "just changing resolution" (actually there's nothing like "changing resolution" )
for 10 point touch support, i need the help of "unreal3000" probably he would help me i think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
once again, he did it just as an experiment, and it isnt really useful on such a small screen(2 fingers for zooming in and out, maybe 5 for some games, thats it!)
is it that the people having membership=senior member and thanks meter=above 1000 should only do this ,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL
No.
Senior Member = members having made more than 100 "useful" posts, and thanks meter has nothing to do with a person's capability
Stop this, you'll probably damage your phone, and perhaps of others too.
cdesai said:
1. Stop spamming the forum, don't open useless threads here and there.
2. The thing you wanna do isnt possible
Each phone has its own specific firmware, and firmware made for one phone wont run on the other, and may also damage the phone
Porting firmware needs a lot of knowledge, you need to do lot more than "just changing resolution" (actually there's nothing like "changing resolution" )
once again, he did it just as an experiment, and it isnt really useful on such a small screen(2 fingers for zooming in and out, maybe 5 for some games, thats it!)
LOL
No.
Senior Member = members having made more than 100 "useful" posts, and thanks meter has nothing to do with a person's capability
Stop this, you'll probably damage your phone, and perhaps of others too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thread closed sorry guys.. :'(
cdesai said:
1. Stop spamming the forum, don't open useless threads here and there.
2. The thing you wanna do isnt possible
Each phone has its own specific firmware, and firmware made for one phone wont run on the other, and may also damage the phone
Porting firmware needs a lot of knowledge, you need to do lot more than "just changing resolution" (actually there's nothing like "changing resolution" )
once again, he did it just as an experiment, and it isnt really useful on such a small screen(2 fingers for zooming in and out, maybe 5 for some games, thats it!)
LOL
No.
Senior Member = members having made more than 100 "useful" posts, and thanks meter has nothing to do with a person's capability
Stop this, you'll probably damage your phone, and perhaps of others too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he needs to be explained this fact in a slightly lighter tone mate
rdass3646 said:
I think he needs to be explained this fact in a slightly lighter tone mate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe yes, but you dont want anyone to damage their phones doing this, do u?
MODERATOR MESSAGE
@OP
I have been following your thread opening trend. You cannot open a new thread for every question you have. Please refrain and use the QnA thread of the Galaxy 3 in the General section.
THREAD CLOSED!

I guess for that we need an separate forum!

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/linux-3-4-kernel-for-the-galaxy-s-plus-gt-i9001/
PLEASE! DO A SGS+ FORUM! WE DESERVE IT!!
p.s: For this i will get an big advertisment but it's ok :laugh:
AW: I guess for that we need an separate forum!
anyone should Start a Petition that we can sign and Hand over To the mods.
And op's please leave this thread in dev section althoug its not directly dev but its only about splus
We should have our own forum idd. Why? Because the i8150 even has his own forum. and we have more development then the i8150
Let's all post as much curse words as possible so we draw the attention of the mods so they will see this thread.
Okay I begin I guess....
No just kidding! You are right we need a seperate forum for our device we always argue with ppl posting **** in the wrong thread
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
broodplank1337 said:
We should have our own forum idd. Why? Because the i8150 even has his own forum. and we have more development then the i8150
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true that we have more development but I don't really see why that would be a comparison.
It would be great if we had a separate forum but in the mod's and admins eyes, we are only an extension/upgrade of the i9000. I can't fathom how many times I have seen this kind of discussion in these forums and how many times the mod's just simply said "No." Well, they have made many changes recently to make sure spam stays minimal so it might be possible if we approach with the fact that having no separate forum creates an unbelievable amount of spam, which is actually pretty damn true.
Xistance said:
This is true that we have more development but I don't really see why that would be a comparison.
It would be great if we had a separate forum but in the mod's and admins eyes, we are only an extension/upgrade of the i9000. I can't fathom how many times I have seen this kind of discussion in these forums and how many times the mod's just simply said "No." Well, they have made many changes recently to make sure spam stays minimal so it might be possible if we approach with the fact that having no separate forum creates an unbelievable amount of spam, which is actually pretty damn true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I think you're actually right. but it's justa pity that we don't have other forums. although it doesn't slow down the development at all! it's only increasing and increasin
But I must admit that asking a Q in the i9000 Q&A forum is just terrible. since it's so i9000 orientated.
But idd the mods just won't change it ever. period
R: I guess for that we need an separate forum!
broodplank1337 said:
Well, I think you're actually right. but it's justa pity that we don't have other forums. although it doesn't slow down the development at all! it's only increasing and increasin
But I must admit that asking a Q in the i9000 Q&A forum is just terrible. since it's so i9000 orientated.
But idd the mods just won't change it ever. period
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If i9001 had a separate forum or had a dedicated section in the i8150 one we would eliminate lots of spam threads or "which ROM is better?" ones
Inviato dal mio frigo a pedali.
i don't think having a separated forum will have any use . we have 1 gb rom still active , 3 ics roms and maybe 3 or 4 jb roms . 4 kernels focused on jb , 1 on ics and 1 on jb . a separate forum for 14 topics ? the only use of a separate forum would be that modders and app devs like brood can get more organized , but brood implements everything he does into his rom forums and modders are getting fewer by the day . and our device is getting old .
probably , after the release of klp most people will move to another device and the forum will be dead . having in consideration that a phone's life is , by industry standard , 2 years ..well we're basically getting a separate forum for a few months afterwards we all would move onto a new device .
it has no use . i9001 has an amazing developing team for a niche device , but all this fuss is not worth it seeing that this is a close knitted , close to a thousand user community .
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Already asked several times to our moderators. Whiskey01 answerd back that they would take it in to a count and they would let us know if any thing changed.
Sure..This will be..ahm..
Never?
R: I guess for that we need an separate forum!
No, the day after never.
Inviato dal mio frigo a pedali.
the real problem is that i9001 is seen as an upgrade of i9000, but they are really different, i discovered only few weeks ago that our Q&A section is in the i9000 one.... and i think it is nonsense, why i have to go in i9000 Q&A to make a question for i9001? it is so confusing, people risk to brick their phones by misreading i9000-i9001 (some i9000 users answer i9001 questions thinking is the same thing.... but even button combination to get in recovery is different)
It could be better if we at least we have a new separate general section :fingers-crossed:
So that development section would be spared from unnecessary threads.
Let's ask the moderator about this :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2
I9070 has a few ROMs / kernels but it has a separated forum !!!!! I'm agree with new forum
I also agree the idea, normal S is completely different phone than our plus.
Yep we need a separate forum.
+1
s and s plus are totally diferent... only have the same appearence
There are a lot of phones out there which have way less development than our great device and have their own forum anyway. I mean come on, our great dev community managed to port kernel 3.4 - and it's as good as bugless! We have a close to beta version of CM10.1, and there are coming up new devs all the time.
Furthermore, the thing with the Q&A thread in i9000 Q&A forum is confusing as hell. Our device has f*ing nothing to do with i9000! And this is also a reason why the dev section is being spammed all the time (I gotta admit that I also once spammed because I was so confused)
So I agree, PLEASE GIVE US OUR OWN FORUM!
I know I just said a lot of things that were mentioned earlier in this thread, but I just wanted to sum it all up.
AW: I guess for that we need an separate forum!
They think that our device is just an other version of the i9000 but the i9070 is just an other version of the i9100, too and the i9070 has his own forum.
And withe an own forum we won't have so many Q/A in development died or how its called
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda premium

Categories

Resources