Related
Has anyone compared the performance between these two ROMS? If you have, what kind of performance/interface tweaks are different between the two?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
d3athsd00r said:
Has anyone compared the performance between these two ROMS? If you have, what kind of performance/interface tweaks are different between the two?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest flashing each and see which one you like. They may run different on your Xoom.
I ran TeamEOS's ICS until yesterday and am now running the CM9 rom. I honestly can't see a difference with regards to performance issues. Will hang on to CM9 for now, but if TeamEOS come up with something spectacular I'm going back to their ICS nightlies. So far the only difference I've noticed is face recognition unlock not working in CM9.
the rogue kernel was slightly faster, but all of the eos features can not be beat right now.
I found both to run with the same smoothness.
I thank all the developers from all the teams for their hard work.
I tried both. Eos has more features, but CM9 is faster.
Quadrant benchmark without overcloking:
Eos: 2303
CM9: 3174
My experience:
TeamEOS nightly is smoother, CM9 (1-15) has CIFS working. (the reason I switched, but will go back to TeamEOS once they got CIFS working).
First off, this is not to take anything away from the incredible work put in by everyone. Its awesome that an online community can put so much effort in and share with people they've never met.
That said, have we gained much from this ICS? I was running XBSALL's GB ROM with the Prometheus kernel and it worked very well. 1400MHz, could occasionally free up 300MB RAM, scored 6500 on Antutu and had good battery life. Has this brought us anything more?
I asked this question before the port and was told that ICS will bring features like RAM management etc that will make our phones much better. We are still in the early stages of a ported ICS so we can't expect much yet but will this upgrade make a big difference to our phones?
I'm still quite a noob - GB was a massive improvement over Froyo, will we eventually see the same level of improvement with ICS?
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
I think so but i guess we have to wait for some time.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
In my opinion the Stock ICS is much better than Stock GB...
Also my Antutu Benchmark scores were:
GB: ~4500
ICS: ~5600
GB(Promethius Project 21e + no idea b1) : 7017
Hehe but you cant compare a custom roms score with stock
Sent from my P920 using ICS 4.0.4 by XBSA
No, of course. Well that's a big jump between stock ROMs and your gain was massive. Is there a potential then to hit 8000? That would be incredible.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
LeighR said:
No, of course. Well that's a big jump between stock ROMs and your gain was massive. Is there a potential then to hit 8000? That would be incredible.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol the O3D would blow up if it hit 8000 but i wonder what is the highest possible OC on the O3D it's strange that not all o3D hit the same OC like i Max out @ 1.38
Well the dark lestat used to be able to oc till 1.69 ghz!!! And me 1.5ghz
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Haha well mine was just over 5000 on stock GB and I managed to improve the score by 1400 but this guy jumped his score over 2500.
Regarding overclock, Prometheus did a really excellent job. On a stock ROM, mine was very unstable if over clocked to 1200 but was smooth at 1400 with his custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
I think so , But we must wait for ICS costum roms and kernrals I hope it will make a difference.
Sent from my LG-P920
LeighR said:
Haha well mine was just over 5000 on stock GB and I managed to improve the score by 1400 but this guy jumped his score over 2500.
Regarding overclock, Prometheus did a really excellent job. On a stock ROM, mine was very unstable if over clocked to 1200 but was smooth at 1400 with his custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tru ICS Needs Samno's Kernel
TMProduct1onZ said:
In my opinion the Stock ICS is much better than Stock GB...
Also my Antutu Benchmark scores were:
GB: ~4500
ICS: ~5600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your stock GB vs stock ICS Rom figures. Good to have this kind of comparison.
Sent from my LG-SU870 using xda premium
ICS make a better use of RAM resources. This can be seen by exiting from games or browsers.
According to speed - maximum benchmarks should be the same on the same MHz. And the MHz depend on the voltage (and this is s.t. that you do not want to increase too much unless you want to charge it every 2h or have a NONmobile phone). And the voltage depend on the kernel. So... in this aspect - they are the same (probably 5% more points gained from different tweaks in the kernel but nobody can say for GB or ICS )
Ability to somewhat multitask by holding down the home button is quite nice.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
biggest differnce? now you can use ics apps... NBA 2K13 yeeeeeeaaaaa
OK, having played around with this, it is a much more efficient firmware. RAM management is better, giving faster performance.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
LeighR said:
That said, have we gained much from this ICS? I was running XBSALL's GB ROM with the Prometheus kernel and it worked very well. 1400MHz, could occasionally free up 300MB RAM, scored 6500 on Antutu and had good battery life. Has this brought us anything more?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW 1400mhz,, never been stable for me 1356 was best imo. i used a few ROMS from here,, i liked cm7 but i didnt like the fact had no 3D , so after trial and error i ended staying with thaiz ROM
after a few headaches and watery eyes ive managed to install ICS big thx xbsalls :good:
on stock rom and kernel , scored 33xx(variable) on quadrant which is pretty impressive me thinks
i love the new rom, and all its features its bit like cm but with 3d lol
going to try and root and install custom rom next
OOOh BTW Ucam also swaps the camera round, its in settings
MattJaO3D said:
WOW 1400mhz,, never been stable for me 1356 was best imo. i used a few ROMS from here,, i liked cm7 but i didnt like the fact had no 3D , so after trial and error i ended staying with thaiz ROM
after a few headaches and watery eyes ive managed to install ICS big thx xbsalls :good:
on stock rom and kernel , scored 33xx(variable) on quadrant which is pretty impressive me thinks
i love the new rom, and all its features its bit like cm but with 3d lol
going to try and root and install custom rom next
OOOh BTW Ucam also swaps the camera round, its in settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
may be you need a refreshment about GB speed
Look at my old benches:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1200179&d=1342373661
Is battery life any better on ICS?
Depend on kernel you use.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda app-developers app
I'm finding battery life worse but I was using a custom kernel before. Its not horrendous like froyo though
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
p-vlad said:
may be you need a refreshment about GB speed
Look at my old benches:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1200179&d=1342373661
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW i was using Acura 3D max for a while but couldnt get a signal with the maximo speed kernels not sure why, only kernel that worked for me was Titan 0.6+
TBH i had to use Titan kernel for most non CM roms in order to get signal, maybe it was my baseband, im still on a massive learning curve lol
The fastet Rom i personally tested for GB was JOY OS , boy that was lightening quick , 4000 - 4200 plus on quadrant
:good:
thx for the info though buddy
Sent from my GT-P3100 using xda app-developers app
Hey fella, dont spam.
Sent from my GT-P3100 using xda app-developers app
Wt?
Sent from my GT-P3100
Cuz I hate that UI so I switched back ics, plz let me know how jb is better than ics for tablet
Sent from my GT-P3100
After it is debloated it runs very smoth and quick, all my apps run fine.
It's much, much better than ICS with 10.1 model.
Nearly 3000 on Quadrant
No more hiccup when playing Final Fantasy III
XBMC is much more workable now.
However, the battery performance is not evaluated yet.
I prefer the bottom notification window of ICS, but Jelly Bean is faster and smoother. My stock, unrooted P3110 gets 3239 in Quadrant. Which is good, I guess. I didn't do any tests with ICS, but this video on youtube shows the stock ICS getting 2521: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jo2_HIR0cEw
After reading alot of 7" users comments i find myself glad they left the 10.1 alone mostly. That being said I haven't noticed a difference in apps or battery over ics cept one game that broke
Sent from my EVO using xda app-developers app
Hello I have been experienceing issues with graphics on all of the sense based jb roms and no.matter which Rom, or kernel I use the graphics are extremely laggy and the advanced games like batman tdkr, and GTA3, as well GTA VC, and a slew of others freeze, lag, quit responding AMD so on. So my question is are there any devs that know of updated gpu drivers for the one x? Currently I had to downgrade back to stock in order to use 90 percent of what I use
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
So I have the US version and I've had it for a while (about a month) and I'm really disappointed with the performance. Scroll lags, the notification shade pulls down smoother on a galaxy player (that has less than 500mb of ram and is single core) and the 3d gaming performance is laggy. Like GTA3 should be able to run on max settings! Just disappointed and expected more.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
OK? Why post this? Why not just get a new phone? Have you tried any other ROMs?
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 4 Beta
I played Tactics Ogre on my phone and Dead Trigger with no problems. Plus with most ROMs I don't encounter the same lag you have experience.
Maybe Powersave mode is on...
tylerlawhon said:
OK? Why post this? Why not just get a new phone? Have you tried any other ROMs?
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, the rest got cut out for some reason. I was asking if anyone else had this problem.
And a new phone is not an option. My family is on forclosure on the house right now so I might just cancel my data plan and use this as like an iPod.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
ericsdeadinside said:
Maybe Powersave mode is on...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trust me I checked that.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Idk man, I've not had much lag at all. I've been rooted since the day I got it of course, so I've been running custom ROMs for a while.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Try flashing Cyanogen Mod from the original android section. General ui is much snappier and it doesn't have game lag like all the 4.1.2 TW ROMs.
Samsung really dropped the ball with the 4.1.2 updates. A phone this powerful should not lag playing temple run.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
I get some lag while playing ingress and minecraft. Kinda annoying but it's better than my old phone and I hope my next is better than this one.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Are you running it stock? Phone runs great with custom stock ROMs & Kernals, but everyone has their own opinions. The games i've played ive not have any lag, but i'm running a custom kernal and ROM. That probably has is the difference, but i'm not overclocked.
well there's only two things that are certain in this world.... no tech device is ever perfect and taxes always increase.
If you expect anything different you will always be disappointed.
That being said, I had ANdroid phones since the HTC Eris and they keep improving. S3 is really nice, maybe the best of this generation, but its not perfect.
Lots of people are looking for infinite gaming speed + infinite battery life... well the two don't go together. There are always trade-off. speed vs. power, vs. size, vs. cost.
Oh and by the way, multi-core is mostly a marketing gimmick. The GPU does most of the graphics work and most apps are not multi-threaded, so a fast single core beats a slower multi-core every time. It's cheaper to make a slow multi-core processor than to make a faster single core.
I also noticed lag on the device which i put off was caused by Touch Wiz. I confirmed this when i finally rooted and started trying different ROMs.
The lag is there in all TW ROM's for me; however if you really want to stick with TW, the smoothest running TW ROM I've tried so far is Goodness. That is what i'm currently using. I don't experience lag during gaming or Apps though even with touch wiz... so might be just your phone.
However, if you can do without touchwiz, the AOSP ROMs are like butter and i experience no lag at all. At least the 4.2.2 ROMS. I've tried Liquidsmooth, paranoid android, Pac-man and Chameleon.
Crazy I'm 100 % stock and my phone runs awesome! I don't do much gaming so I can't chime in on that but I don't have lag at all like you describe. Do you have a live wallpaper installed??
Sent from my GeeEssThree
I've tried a lot of the TW based ROM, Synergy, Hyperdrive , others and all the well developed one's run great for me. I don't see any lag. I also tried CM10 and no noticeable difference, I think a lot of the comment are caused by placebo effec, some people just hate OEM stufft. Also people will load up their home screens with 3000 widgets and say wow this phone / rom sucks, LOL m Then they load some new ROM with no widgets yet and go, wow this is really smooth....... until they load 3000 widgets and it sucks again. Hey , there really is a limit to performance on any phone.