So what difference has ICS made? - LG Optimus 3D

First off, this is not to take anything away from the incredible work put in by everyone. Its awesome that an online community can put so much effort in and share with people they've never met.
That said, have we gained much from this ICS? I was running XBSALL's GB ROM with the Prometheus kernel and it worked very well. 1400MHz, could occasionally free up 300MB RAM, scored 6500 on Antutu and had good battery life. Has this brought us anything more?
I asked this question before the port and was told that ICS will bring features like RAM management etc that will make our phones much better. We are still in the early stages of a ported ICS so we can't expect much yet but will this upgrade make a big difference to our phones?
I'm still quite a noob - GB was a massive improvement over Froyo, will we eventually see the same level of improvement with ICS?
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

I think so but i guess we have to wait for some time.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

In my opinion the Stock ICS is much better than Stock GB...
Also my Antutu Benchmark scores were:
GB: ~4500
ICS: ~5600
GB(Promethius Project 21e + no idea b1) : 7017
Hehe but you cant compare a custom roms score with stock
Sent from my P920 using ICS 4.0.4 by XBSA

No, of course. Well that's a big jump between stock ROMs and your gain was massive. Is there a potential then to hit 8000? That would be incredible.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

LeighR said:
No, of course. Well that's a big jump between stock ROMs and your gain was massive. Is there a potential then to hit 8000? That would be incredible.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol the O3D would blow up if it hit 8000 but i wonder what is the highest possible OC on the O3D it's strange that not all o3D hit the same OC like i Max out @ 1.38

Well the dark lestat used to be able to oc till 1.69 ghz!!! And me 1.5ghz
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

Haha well mine was just over 5000 on stock GB and I managed to improve the score by 1400 but this guy jumped his score over 2500.
Regarding overclock, Prometheus did a really excellent job. On a stock ROM, mine was very unstable if over clocked to 1200 but was smooth at 1400 with his custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

I think so , But we must wait for ICS costum roms and kernrals I hope it will make a difference.
Sent from my LG-P920

LeighR said:
Haha well mine was just over 5000 on stock GB and I managed to improve the score by 1400 but this guy jumped his score over 2500.
Regarding overclock, Prometheus did a really excellent job. On a stock ROM, mine was very unstable if over clocked to 1200 but was smooth at 1400 with his custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tru ICS Needs Samno's Kernel

TMProduct1onZ said:
In my opinion the Stock ICS is much better than Stock GB...
Also my Antutu Benchmark scores were:
GB: ~4500
ICS: ~5600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your stock GB vs stock ICS Rom figures. Good to have this kind of comparison.
Sent from my LG-SU870 using xda premium

ICS make a better use of RAM resources. This can be seen by exiting from games or browsers.
According to speed - maximum benchmarks should be the same on the same MHz. And the MHz depend on the voltage (and this is s.t. that you do not want to increase too much unless you want to charge it every 2h or have a NONmobile phone). And the voltage depend on the kernel. So... in this aspect - they are the same (probably 5% more points gained from different tweaks in the kernel but nobody can say for GB or ICS )

Ability to somewhat multitask by holding down the home button is quite nice.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

biggest differnce? now you can use ics apps... NBA 2K13 yeeeeeeaaaaa

OK, having played around with this, it is a much more efficient firmware. RAM management is better, giving faster performance.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

LeighR said:
That said, have we gained much from this ICS? I was running XBSALL's GB ROM with the Prometheus kernel and it worked very well. 1400MHz, could occasionally free up 300MB RAM, scored 6500 on Antutu and had good battery life. Has this brought us anything more?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW 1400mhz,, never been stable for me 1356 was best imo. i used a few ROMS from here,, i liked cm7 but i didnt like the fact had no 3D , so after trial and error i ended staying with thaiz ROM
after a few headaches and watery eyes ive managed to install ICS big thx xbsalls :good:
on stock rom and kernel , scored 33xx(variable) on quadrant which is pretty impressive me thinks
i love the new rom, and all its features its bit like cm but with 3d lol
going to try and root and install custom rom next
OOOh BTW Ucam also swaps the camera round, its in settings

MattJaO3D said:
WOW 1400mhz,, never been stable for me 1356 was best imo. i used a few ROMS from here,, i liked cm7 but i didnt like the fact had no 3D , so after trial and error i ended staying with thaiz ROM
after a few headaches and watery eyes ive managed to install ICS big thx xbsalls :good:
on stock rom and kernel , scored 33xx(variable) on quadrant which is pretty impressive me thinks
i love the new rom, and all its features its bit like cm but with 3d lol
going to try and root and install custom rom next
OOOh BTW Ucam also swaps the camera round, its in settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
may be you need a refreshment about GB speed
Look at my old benches:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1200179&d=1342373661

Is battery life any better on ICS?

Depend on kernel you use.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda app-developers app

I'm finding battery life worse but I was using a custom kernel before. Its not horrendous like froyo though
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app

p-vlad said:
may be you need a refreshment about GB speed
Look at my old benches:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1200179&d=1342373661
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW i was using Acura 3D max for a while but couldnt get a signal with the maximo speed kernels not sure why, only kernel that worked for me was Titan 0.6+
TBH i had to use Titan kernel for most non CM roms in order to get signal, maybe it was my baseband, im still on a massive learning curve lol
The fastet Rom i personally tested for GB was JOY OS , boy that was lightening quick , 4000 - 4200 plus on quadrant
:good:
thx for the info though buddy

Related

[Q] Best Kernel Out

What is the best kernel out so far as in performance and battery life.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
That's not an easy question to answer as it all comes down to personal preference. I've tried a few so far and Lee's is suiting my needs so far.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
I have the same questions and since it has been a while I figure more people have more input.
I keep hearing about TPC Stock ROM Optimized with Buzz OC.UV Kernel?
I am a total newb, but I really just want as few deviations from the stock as possible but unlocked, somewhat overclocked when I am working, extreme underclock on idle, and remove the bloatware.
What have you guys found?
Try Ingersoll.
On the AOSP side LordMod from the DHD section is awesome. That won't help you if you're using a Sense ROM, though.
CM7 Inspire 4G
Lordmod on cm7.
how do you know which one to use?
BFS vs. CFS
im a big fan of that guy di11igaf. Great work, good guy, and I hear he's pretty good lookin too.
di11igaf said:
im a big fan of that guy di11igaf. Great work, good guy, and I hear he's pretty good lookin too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahaha. di11s work = EXCELLENT ROM, EXCELLENT KERNEL. Current uptime is 215 hours and counting. Clocked at 1036 on SetCPU.
tribalartgod said:
hahaha. di11s work = EXCELLENT ROM, EXCELLENT KERNEL. Current uptime is 215 hours and counting. Clocked at 1036 on SetCPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DEAR LORD IS THIS TRUE?
Must flash...
If you notice, just about everyone gave you a different answer. There is no best rom. generally speaking, batt life is determined by clock speed and usage. plus each rom is a little unique. Just try out different roms and see what you think.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA Premium App
ml42 said:
DEAR LORD IS THIS TRUE?
Must flash...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup... this is how I test ROMs. If they make it past 250 hours, then they are worthy. To this day, I have only had one ROM do this, and that was on my G1. It was the TMUS rom by amazinglarry311. Di11s ROM so far is going to be the second, by the looks of it.
I run Cache Cleaner NG once every other day, tho it's really not needed that often.
Still have over 211mb free when using Advanced Task Killer, and no lags.
Battery life is from about 8:30am til just after midnight. In this time frame, the lowest I've gone is 22%. Average of 225 texts a day, maybe 3 phone calls, music ALL day at work (not streaming), and check FB every 2 hours or so. Along with the occasional email here and there.
I can't imagine sending 225 text messages in one day.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
acPIZZA said:
I can't imagine sending 225 text messages in one day.
Sent from my Desire HD using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I send about 1000 a day =P
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App
Lee Droid works great for me, just like roms its what works good for u.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App
lee's rom v 2.2.1 has been working great for me, but i want to up grade to v 2.2.3. Do I need to backup all my apps and do a clean install or could i just install over current version.
pgordon1955 said:
lee's rom v 2.2.1 has been working great for me, but i want to up grade to v 2.2.3. Do I need to backup all my apps and do a clean install or could i just install over current version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just update
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App

Overclocked to 1.3Ghz Quadrant benchmark results

Just thought i'd show a pic
What did u use to o/c tegrak? And its to blurry, can't make out the score
Sent from my damn Fo-GEE!!
Success100 said:
What did u use to o/c tegrak? And its to blurry, can't make out the score
Sent from my damn Fo-GEE!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea tegrak... i'll try to get a clear one didnt know it came out that blurry plus i didnt keep track of score cuz i've been getting that all day
I know this is a stupid question but other than improve quadrant scores, what else does it really improve? Im running the overclock at 1.2ghz right now and I dont notice any difference
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
I was testing it out and it didn't really make much of a difference on my for Quadrant Standard. I used SetCPU and put both min and max to 1.3 and set scaling to performance and not a big change. I dunno if I'm doing something wrong.
well i'm also deodexed kd1, bali kernel so i dunno n also runnin the touchwiz 4.0(beautiful interface, just a btw)... well my overall performance improved n battery life surprisingly good... its been 7 hrs now and i still got juice...
Success100 said:
What did u use to o/c tegrak? And its to blurry, can't make out the score
Sent from my damn Fo-GEE!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
most recent score 1211
What exactly do I have to do to OC it? I tried it when I had my Captivate but I thought that I needed a different kernel? SetCPU wouldn't let me go over 1ghz... But I do have the bali kernel flashed right now.
EDIT: Nevermind, I saw the other post right after I made this. Sorry to interrupt!
I started a thread about this a while back and I wanted to share the info that was shared to me. Just FYI
joedeveloper said:
Quadrant Advanced provides the breakdown for each individual area (multi-colored).
http://slideme.org/application/quadrant-advanced
The thing about quadrant however, is it's not optimized or suited for the processor in our phones (Hummingbird). It was designed for snapdragon processors.
Additionally, Quadrant is sub par in my opinion on benchmark test apps (even though it's well known) because it does operations that aren't typical. If you get advanced you'll see that it does like 60% all IO operations, however thats a really strange test because it would be like you running a full on database on your phone.
So the scenarios and tests it runs are not representative of the scenarios you are going to use your phone to perform.
I like SmartBench better because it gives you an index for Gaming and Productivity.
Samsung Galaxy S 4G's will slightly outperform the snapdragon/adreno combo that you see in the MT4G etc. Very slight advantage. In regard to productivity it does well too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U won't notice anything earth shattering from an extra 200 MHz. However for games and flash and videos it does help. Also improves app loading times and things like that so even though it doesn't seem to do much it does help alot when the phone is pushed to the 1ghz area
icy56 said:
I know this is a stupid question but other than improve quadrant scores, what else does it really improve? Im running the overclock at 1.2ghz right now and I dont notice any difference
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my damn Fo-GEE!!
fknfocused said:
I started a thread about this a while back and I wanted to share the info that was shared to me. Just FYI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did use smartbench too.... n in terms of gaming it was rite up there with optimus but likely lower in productivity
Scored 1263 Running deodexed KD1, with Bali kernel and spb shell (which is kind of a resource hog)
I know it doesn't truly give a benchmark for our processor, but just like getting your car dyno'd before you build it... it's good for a baseline number. And I was just under 900 stock.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
shotchacokov said:
Scored 1263 Running deodexed KD1, with Bali kernel and spb shell (which is kind of a resource hog)
I know it doesn't truly give a benchmark for our processor, but just like getting your car dyno'd before you build it... it's good for a baseline number. And I was just under 900 stock.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where'd you get that battery?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
At 1.3ghz
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
@1.3ghz ... this i wud say is an average cuz i've gotten better
badb4lyfe said:
well i'm also deodexed kd1, bali kernel so i dunno n also runnin the touchwiz 4.0(beautiful interface, just a btw)... well my overall performance improved n battery life surprisingly good... its been 7 hrs now and i still got juice...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woah, where did you get touchwiz 4 for our phone ? Ive been looking for it all day on google and I can only find the original galaxy s and the epic 4g's
skillz398 said:
Woah, where did you get touchwiz 4 for our phone ? Ive been looking for it all day on google and I can only find the original galaxy s and the epic 4g's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1074410
a thanks would be much appreciated
rickyy00 said:
Where'd you get that battery?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look for the status bar mod....under themes
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Is 1.0ghz what your phones comes with?
Sent from my cellular device
rickyy00 said:
Is 1.0ghz what your phones comes with?
Sent from my cellular device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes that wud be correct

[Tweak]U.S.A.S

These are some tweaks created by dsexton702 that offer you a generous performance boost in I/O and giving you the newest fugu mod 3.1. This is a fast growing tweak and needs to be shared with everyone who can benefit from it
This has been tested on inspire
download the U.S.A.Sv6
OP: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1236779
dling now...will report back with results
ETA: phone may be a little smoother? quad scores and linpack scores both stayed in the same range
is this to work with aosp and sense roms?
It seems to work with Static Nonsense...I can tell a difference but I wouldn't say its dramatic.
I lost root with this, then fixed it, but didn't notice any real improvement after that. Scores stayed the same.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA App
Nickovtyme said:
It seems to work with Static Nonsense...I can tell a difference but I wouldn't say its dramatic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would it be worth me cooking in?
beerbaronstatic said:
would it be worth me cooking in?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't hurt. I have to admit my web pages are loading faster, transitions are smoother...apps seem to be loading quicker and overall I can tell a difference...but again I have to say its not a "I'm just blown away by this" difference.
Just wanted to add that after flashing this, the first boot took forever...so long in fact I thought I was gonna have to pull the battery and recover a recent backup.
It did improve overall. even lower bat. drain. Thank you dsexton702 for the share.
I do what I can for you guys
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA Premium App
Nickovtyme said:
Couldn't hurt. I have to admit my web pages are loading faster, transitions are smoother...apps seem to be loading quicker and overall I can tell a difference...but again I have to say its not a "I'm just blown away by this" difference.
Just wanted to add that after flashing this, the first boot took forever...so long in fact I thought I was gonna have to pull the battery and recover a recent backup.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you using?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App
First boot took a little while for me as well using CM7 nightly, but I do definitely like the increase in how smooth everything feels.
Anyone using this with a Sense ROM?
I'm using with VU 2.35 sense 3.0 and it does wonders my score before at 1 ghz. Was 1800
Right after installing u.s.a.s still at 1 ghz jumped up to 2200 quadrent score.
After oc to 1.3 ghz my quadrent score was 2600
Runs very nice hard to tell difference as VU 2.35 runs so smooth but its an improvement
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Went from 1991 to 2056. VU 2.35 runs very nice, but was having a small hesitation when turning on screen and this seems to have fixed that issue. Very nice work
So if I cook this in, my autofill does NOT work in messaging, but if I flash it after a rom install its fine
This is an awesome tweak my processor has never been stable over 1.3 now Im running 1.7 ghz and its crazy fast got my quadrent score up to 3000 running this fast
Never had such a smooth experience doesn't matter how many apps are open.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
ac3kill said:
This is an awesome tweak my processor has never been stable over 1.3 now Im running 1.7 ghz and its crazy fast got my quadrent score up to 3000 running this fast
Never had such a smooth experience doesn't matter how many apps are open.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM r u using?
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Vu 2.37
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
I'm getting pretty great battery life with this mod. It's playing nice with VU 2.37, things seem pretty smoothed out. Thanks for the mod!
Why does auto fill not work when trying to type a persons name to send text ?
Works before I install this.
Not a big deal but does suck having to go into phonebook and scroll threw alp my contacts to send a message
Just wonder if I can get the ease of typing the persons name back and keep this tweak
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda premium

Ultimate setup. Post what your setup is on your captivate

Hey guys I just wanted to start a thread where people can post their setup including rom kernel modem or anything else that seems fit. This does not mean that any are the best but it may give other people cool ideas on how to make theirs better.
Here's mine and its nothing special.
I have cm7 with a kernal that allows me to overclock it to 1.7 (its a beta and is version 12 or something) then I use voltage control to overclock to 1.2 and undervolt. I also just use the stock modem. Some cool apps I use are widgetlocker which allows Widgets on your lock screen and circle launcher.
I am definatly not an expert so sorry for any mistakes.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
I also wanted to add in that I do not think mine is the ultimate setup cause I'm sure its no were near it. The title is just there as a subject.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
gregnetz18 said:
I also wanted to add in that I do not think mine is the ultimate setup cause I'm sure its no were near it. The title is just there as a subject.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just for next time there is an edit button if you want to edit a post.
I'm running latest Miui with stock kernel and modem. Overclocked to 1.2Ghz with voltage control. Work has been crazy lately and I've been too lazy to experiment with different modems and kernels
Im on Cog 5. No overclocking, no nothing. Just stock Cog 5.
I am using the gingerbread launcher, though, instead of touchwiz. I prefer its simplicity.
This is the best my phone has ever worked.
Victory rom2.0 here with go launcher ;-) like butter
Thanks for the feedback guys!
Pinnacle 1.3
Boog's KH3 kernel version 5 (I think)
KE3 modem
Really smooth even without lag fix.
Best battery life I've ever had.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Latest MIUI
Latest Glitch kernel
JW2 modem
OC'd to 1.3GHz
UV'd -125mV
Runs ultra smooth for me, with great battery life.
Swyped from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
LATEST MIUI
1.6 GHz OC'ed
-150 UV'ed
Glitch V12 b3
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
so u guys are running the same thing as me basicly but with miui. sorry if i spelt that wrong. do u think i should go to it from cm7
gregnetz18 said:
so u guys are running the same thing as me basicly but with miui. sorry if i spelt that wrong. do u think i should go to it from cm7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a personal preference. I like MIUI over CM7
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Victory Rom with KH3, Boog's kernal, TW launcher was buggy til revert to TW3, great battery life.
b-eock said:
It is a personal preference. I like MIUI over CM7
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, for me MIUI has a few things over cm7 that I liked more. You just have to try it and see
Swyped from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Unbrickable mod multi rom's per week
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
bulletproof1013 said:
Unbrickable mod multi rom's per week
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here! Its great, no worries!
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Currently Apex 10.1 with the KC1 modem and the latest Talon kernel. Runs great.
CM7 Nightly 134, Glitch 12 beta kernal, jl3 modem, overclocked to 1.2Ghz with Smartass Governor.
Silence Will Fall
Well, I just got my Captivate (old version), and I'm loving it!!
I've switched ROM's a lot, but now I'm on Dlev 4.2 - Talon kernel.
I'm pretty sure this is overclocked, given the Quadrant scores. Battery life is pretty good - a little more than a day with regular use (games, browsing, talking, texting).
So if I went to miui would I have to reflash my v12 kernel that you other guys have to? I like the way miui looks but I wish it had touchwiz
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
MIUI 1.9.16
NEO 17r12, OC to 1200mhz, no UV
V51 Screen state script, ondemand/powersave governors, vr scheduler
BVJJW2 modem

Scott's CleanKernel v. IMO's leanKernel

IMO updated his TouchWiz kernel yesterday. Up until today I was using Scott's CleanKernel. Both are amazing kernels in my eyes. Both kernels are undervolted and overclocked. I had no issues with CleanKernel at all. I always seems to have bad battery life on the leanKernel until I flashed the updated .4 version this morning. Battery life seems much better compared to any leanKernel before the update. When running CleanKernel, I got a quadrant score of 4980. With leanKernel 0.4 I got 5160, both at stock 1.5GHz. I just want to see if others have noticed what I have between these two kernels.
You forgot that both are released in the Development section. A place where this thread does NOT belong...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
how do i move or delete it?
vx2ko said:
how do i move or delete it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
drbveb88 said:
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA needs more people like you. Great reply and it made sense.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
This was handled nicely, thanks guys!
In the future OP pay attention to where you post and
read forum rules and stickies before posting
Thread Moved
FNM
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
personally i like leankernal because of how light and simple it is. no unneccesary weight and battery life is great.
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
vx2ko said:
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Clienterror said:
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you on the kernel changing concept. And I have also noticed that .4 is much better than .3
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
buhohitr said:
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
vx2ko said:
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
buhohitr said:
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
vx2ko said:
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha.. you got it...almost.. Performance+battery life+stable=Clean. Super perfornance -less battery life - 10% stable=Lean kernel. Good luck bro.
ok I just setup an app profile in setcpu. so now everytime im in my game, its overclocked. When im using it normally, its at stock speed. With the screen off, its at min 190 and max 452. so far so good!
.5 is up now with more fixes.
http://rootzwiki.com/index.php?/topic/31329-[kernel][touchwiz]-Leankernel:-Minimalistic-Kernel-(8/28---v0.5)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Thanks for the heads up! More battery drain fixes. Although it says in order to revert back to stock we have to flash a ROM with a kernel. Would a nan backup work? Anyone tests the kernel yet

Categories

Resources