IMO updated his TouchWiz kernel yesterday. Up until today I was using Scott's CleanKernel. Both are amazing kernels in my eyes. Both kernels are undervolted and overclocked. I had no issues with CleanKernel at all. I always seems to have bad battery life on the leanKernel until I flashed the updated .4 version this morning. Battery life seems much better compared to any leanKernel before the update. When running CleanKernel, I got a quadrant score of 4980. With leanKernel 0.4 I got 5160, both at stock 1.5GHz. I just want to see if others have noticed what I have between these two kernels.
You forgot that both are released in the Development section. A place where this thread does NOT belong...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
how do i move or delete it?
vx2ko said:
how do i move or delete it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
drbveb88 said:
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA needs more people like you. Great reply and it made sense.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
This was handled nicely, thanks guys!
In the future OP pay attention to where you post and
read forum rules and stickies before posting
Thread Moved
FNM
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
personally i like leankernal because of how light and simple it is. no unneccesary weight and battery life is great.
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
vx2ko said:
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Clienterror said:
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you on the kernel changing concept. And I have also noticed that .4 is much better than .3
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
buhohitr said:
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
vx2ko said:
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
buhohitr said:
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
vx2ko said:
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha.. you got it...almost.. Performance+battery life+stable=Clean. Super perfornance -less battery life - 10% stable=Lean kernel. Good luck bro.
ok I just setup an app profile in setcpu. so now everytime im in my game, its overclocked. When im using it normally, its at stock speed. With the screen off, its at min 190 and max 452. so far so good!
.5 is up now with more fixes.
http://rootzwiki.com/index.php?/topic/31329-[kernel][touchwiz]-Leankernel:-Minimalistic-Kernel-(8/28---v0.5)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Thanks for the heads up! More battery drain fixes. Although it says in order to revert back to stock we have to flash a ROM with a kernel. Would a nan backup work? Anyone tests the kernel yet
Related
Hello there
I recently purchased a Nexus S, it's soooo good to be on Android, I love it!
So I've played around with some ROMs and I've settled on MIUI, I absolutely love the menu scheme and a few other features.
I've done some reading up on different kernels and ROMs for the Nexus S and I'm finding it hard deciding what to go for.
Of course, I know, it's all down to me, my personal preference and what I use my phone for, but, I was wondering if you guys wouldn't mind suggesting a few things?
I'd like to stick on a MIUI based ROM at least (mainly for the menu scheme), and of course I want what everyone wants; decent battery life, decent performance, nice and solid.
So, what d'you reckon in regard to different kernels and ROM mixes?
Thanks very much for your time, any help is greatly appreciated
Matr1x!!!
let the flaming begin hehehe
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
well well , i am in the same situation as you are , that don't know which rom and kernel to choose
i was using stock + talon 3.2.1 kernel , it's damn good
i am now using Brainmaster's MIUI , it's good as well , but as we all know , MIUI is kinda like battery killer ... so i need a good kernel to make battery lasts as longer as possible
currently i am using Franco kernel feel little lag , perhaps it's because i may set wrong governor ...
i also heard Lucid and Matrix lasts pretty long battery life , so i am planning using franco for next few days and then flash other kernel to see if it's true.
but one thing for sure , if you wanna have battery last as long as possible , then stock would be your first choice , personal experience more stock = more battery life
---------- Post added at 08:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 PM ----------
mathkid95 said:
Matr1x!!!
let the flaming begin hehehe
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could you gimme some suggestion which governor for Matr1x ?
mathkid95 said:
Matr1x!!!
let the flaming begin hehehe
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny you should say that Mathkid! I'm using Matr1x right now, thoroughly impressed with the performance so far! I'll use it over the next week or so and see how I do, but this is promising results already Do you have any recommendations for tweaks or anything I should be setting to coincide with your kernel? I haven't OC'd or anything
Thanks very much for the feedback qtwrk! Good to hear someone else in in the same boat but is doing a bit more about it! I need to be a bit more adventurous
Qt I would go either ondemand, smartassv2, or lazy... for me, lazy seems to offer the best battery life with a retention of snappiness... but you can't go wrong with any of em
Eternal maybe ezekeels mods? Just be careful tho, because deep idle can be a bit of a bugger sometimes....
In addition try using 1.2 or 1.3 ghz
Please feel free to post in the matrix thread if you have any questions!!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Awesome, thanks very much for the feedback! I'll post on the Matr1x thread to let you know how I get on
;D
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
Qt I would go either ondemand, smartassv2, or lazy... for me, lazy seems to offer the best battery life with a retention of snappiness... but you can't go wrong with any of em
Eternal maybe ezekeels mods? Just be careful tho, because deep idle can be a bit of a bugger sometimes....
In addition try using 1.2 or 1.3 ghz
Please feel free to post in the matrix thread if you have any questions!!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow, i just noticed it is your kernel , surprise XD
Lol
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Amazed
Sweet lord.... (for lack of a better term)
This is f****ing amazing!
Using MIUI with Matr1x v9.0 CFS with the lazy governor:
I've been up and had my phone off charge from 5:30am (yes, I know, work is an evil, evil thing) It's now 4:32pm and I'm on 89% battery!?
I may have been at work all day... but that doesn't mean I haven't been using my phone! In fact I was using it nearly all day!
The craziest thing is... I have it OC'd to 1.3GHz, snappy as ever, in fact I don't think I've used a faster phone?
Okay... so there's a little something; I've had data and wifi turned off (I'll just turn 'em on for when I need 'em) and I'm using JuiceDefender Ultimate to help out, but, this proves as a suuuuper nice setup for performance and battery life.
Absolutely astonished, I know it's only been one day, but, if nothing changes, I think I'll be sticking with this as my setup for the foreseeable future
Excellent work Mathkid! I'll be posting screenshots of my future setups to my DeviantArt page: eternalkernel.deviantart.com in the future and I'll be sure to mention my setup and give you praise. People are always curious about the innards of the phone, not just how it looks, so that should help spread the word a bit more about your awesome work.
Thanks again Mathkid, keep it up!
For the best overall performance and battery life, definitely try the Matr1x kernel..
If you want some more battery life, but less performance, try the franco.Kernel
If you still want more battery life, then give Morfic's TEUV kernel a try.
What is the best kernel for NS in terms of:
performance? (but drains battery faster)
Battery saving?
poging22 said:
What is the best kernel for NS in terms of:
performance? (but drains battery faster)
Battery saving?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no best kernel. All the threads asking receive the same answer, that is that it all comes down to personal preference. Try them all and see what you like best.
063_XOBX said:
There is no best kernel. All the threads asking receive the same answer, that is that it all comes down to personal preference. Try them all and see what you like best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yow dude! so based on your experience, which kernel do you prefer?
I tried Trinity, drains my battery faster than usual.
I've been using Matr1x, but some people have had issues. That's why I really can't recommend anything other than that you try a few and see what works best for you.
No issues with Matr1x dude...
Op, what rom u on?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
No issues with Matr1x dude...
Op, what rom u on?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't say there were anything wrong with the kernel (I wouldn't use it myself if that were my belief) , I simply stated the fact that some people have run into some issues (S.O.D., etc.).
what's SOD?
qtwrk said:
what's SOD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sleep of Death, phone goes into sleep mode and freezes. Raising the Voltages helps.
I have tried every kernel out there & have had trouble in some form with all of them, except for the Glados Kernel. Rock solid stable, & a nice balance of performance / battery life. Using NStools allows you to get the most out of the kernel. I use it with live OC set at 105, & the lazy governer. This is what works well for me, it may differ for your phone.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Yes kernels run differently on different phones
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
poging22 said:
What is the best kernel for NS in terms of:
performance? (but drains battery faster)
Battery saving?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a adventure you have to take alone
in all seriousness you gotta try out Trinity =]
Check out the kernels in this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1283031
The nice thing about it is the availability of the 1320MHz frequency (if needed), yet you can run an undervolted setting most of the time and enjoy great battery life.
Most other kernels seem to be either fast or good on battery, here you get both in one package. Give it a test drive!
irizwan said:
Thats a adventure you have to take alone
in all seriousness you gotta try out Trinity =]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Trinity now with 1.54 OC. It's snappy but drains battery fast.
A millionth time I've seen such a thread, and a millionth time I say the same - "Its your own personal choice..."
Not angry or such but just trying to make a joke...
I'm pretty much happy with the Matr1x Kernel, Netarchy dies on me, GLaDos is pretty good too, Trinity dies on me too...
by the way, MIUI has its own kernel? When you flash MIUI, what kernel do you get in default?
how about CM7?
What's the difference between Cfs and Bfs?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Yeah can someone answer? What's the difference?
read this..
http://www.cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/data/bfs-v-cfs_groves-knockel-schulte.pdf
poging22 said:
by the way, MIUI has its own kernel? When you flash MIUI, what kernel do you get in default?
how about CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
depends on what version of MIUI you flash
poging22 said:
I'm using Trinity now with 1.54 OC. It's snappy but drains battery fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whys it all the way up :O i mean OC'd just install TUV and use LiveOC 110 =/
It'll just OC it to about 1110 Mhz + 10% clock increase of the GPU
HI guys
Im currently using MIUI US Rom ver 2.4.6 with stock kernel. can anyone recommend me a fast and stable kernel compatible with this rom?
Will these do the trick?
I've heard only good things about Trinity, but I stopped using MIUI a long time ago, it's pretty outdated at this point.
I personally use the Trinity kernel when running MIUI but some prefer Faux123's kernel. It tends to be you choose which ever one is the most stable for your phone as not all are created equal. The other thing to note is that if you flash the kernel straight from morfic it will cause you to loose the ability to set themes and keep them after a reboot.
I have the modified Trinity Kernels that you can get to try and they both are flashable from CWM and have the theme fixes.
They are both found here >>Trinity Kernel<<
If you want to know the difference between them go to morfics thread and the explanations are there.
thanks for the elaborated explanation and the Trinity builds. but what stability lose am i to experience? i flashed 4 hours ago ELP build and i have no problems with the themes.
You aren't necessarily going to experience stability issues. It is just a possibility you could. If you aren't then you will be fine.
I do suggest that you get setcpu so you can set the clock speed to the 1.1ghz that the kernel wants to default to but the os pushes it down to 1.0. But it is not a nessecity.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
The Destroyer
I would use The Destroyer16. I've seen many MIUI G2x's run stable and decent battery life (with a little UV) with this kernel. Plus 1.6ghz max will rip benchmark scores like crazy. Only good for gb 2.3.7 MIUI IMO. You can find it in the huge Trinity thread under g2x development.
grayson.mott said:
I would use The Destroyer16. I've seen many MIUI G2x's run stable and decent battery life (with a little UV) with this kernel. Plus 1.6ghz max will rip benchmark scores like crazy. Only good for gb 2.3.7 MIUI IMO. You can find it in the huge Trinity thread under g2x development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont do this unless you know what your doing. it works on any CM7 based rom, but its very unstable and really only used for testing and benchmarking.
Klathmon said:
dont do this unless you know what your doing. it works on any CM7 based rom, but its very unstable and really only used for testing and benchmarking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.
Faux 49 kernel. Amazing battery life.
Sent from my Handheld Portal Device
stormageddon said:
I personally use the Trinity kernel when running MIUI but some prefer Faux123's kernel. It tends to be you choose which ever one is the most stable for your phone as not all are created equal. The other thing to note is that if you flash the kernel straight from morfic it will cause you to loose the ability to set themes and keep them after a reboot.
I have the modified Trinity Kernels that you can get to try and they both are flashable from CWM and have the theme fixes.
They are both found here >>Trinity Kernel<<
If you want to know the difference between them go to morfics thread and the explanations are there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both zip don't work
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
LostInNorth805 said:
Both zip don't work
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They should work fine. I have been using them myself and others have used it with no problems.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Is there a kernel that will play good with Hellfire Sandwich 1.7 (dirty) and that can be overclocked?
Sent from my Hell Bound Thumbs
Milton515 said:
Is there a kernel that will play good with Hellfire Sandwich 1.7 (dirty) and that can be overclocked?
Sent from my Hell Bound Thumbs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running the latest harsh OC kernel with no problems.. And there's a new faux kernel 050 b1 that's out, I haven't tried it yet tho so can't say how it is..
Milton515 said:
Is there a kernel that will play good with Hellfire Sandwich 1.7 (dirty) and that can be overclocked?
Sent from my Hell Bound Thumbs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody can tell you which Kernel will work best for whatever ROM you wish to use it for because even though we have the 'same' phone, they are not all equally built. What may work with amazing battery life and performance to one person, might be terribly sluggish with terrible battery life for the next person. The only real way to tell which ROM+Kernel combo works best for your phone is to try every Kernel you think your phone 'likes'. Whether we all want to admit it or not, that is probably the best way.
Hope this helped, Good luck!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Are there any kernels that work with CM7.2 RC1 that both allow for OC/(UV) and don't completely break the accellerometer?
I have tried Trinity and Faux. I would really like to get back to ridiculous battery life from this extended battery pack.
thesheep said:
Are there any kernels that work with CM7.2 RC1 that both allow for OC/(UV) and don't completely break the accellerometer?
I have tried Trinity and Faux. I would really like to get back to ridiculous battery life from this extended battery pack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it that difficult to make a new thread? I'm using faux right now and my accelerometer is fine.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Harsh's kernel....
Sent from my Handheld Portal Device
In my opinion, the best kernel for G2X is Trenity
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Trinity Kernels
I recently installed the Trinity Kernel and I don't really feel like I see a difference in my phone. I feel like my battery has shown no improvement. I installed the ti5 one but maybe I'll try the ELP one instead to see if I get anything different. I'm really looking for longer battery life. I used the phone theses days for about 30min of music a day (subway ride) and browsing here and there. Turned all syncing and app notifications off.
Check out the attached photos. I've seen screenshots of people with bar graphs showing their device at the top way ahead of everyone else.
I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
This is what I did too and it's working wonders.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Good News on Thx 4 the post
jrichards2007 said:
I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for your post and gr8 find on the busybox
I have been trying to decide which one to load
SynergyROM 1.3
or
SynergyROM 1.5
Now I know that imo 12.2 will work
long as the busybox is loaded first.
due to the issues with 12.2 loop booting.
Now I can load 1.4 will let you know how it goes.
Thanks Again.
Cheers,
Azbobs
Worked for me too
Worked for me as well. Thanks for the post.
Sent from my Sammy Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31329-imoseyon-test-leankernel-tw-82-v122-kexec/
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
SightSeeker said:
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Earl831SC said:
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My setting stay after rebooting so yes. I check with system tuner pro.
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
12bravo said:
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may have accidentally flashed the v12 of the kernel. On the thread on rootzwiki look under changelog and download v12.2 it should fix the LED issue.
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Bonus: A tad off topic, but I was wondering if anyone running the synergy roms replaced their touchwiz apps with aosp apps? Reason I ask is because I cannot live without the ICS email client and prefer the messaging client as well.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
sensui123 said:
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to play around with Google Now then go for 1.4. 1.5 will not require a wipe according to eschelon. I've found the battery life on 1.4 to be close to par with 1.3. Maybe a little more battery hungry, but not much.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
tmar23 said:
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are using the script it is option 4 to set max frequency for CPU1
Thanks, I had to force dual core mode for some reason, then it gave me the ability to change cpu1.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app