I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
This is what I did too and it's working wonders.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Good News on Thx 4 the post
jrichards2007 said:
I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for your post and gr8 find on the busybox
I have been trying to decide which one to load
SynergyROM 1.3
or
SynergyROM 1.5
Now I know that imo 12.2 will work
long as the busybox is loaded first.
due to the issues with 12.2 loop booting.
Now I can load 1.4 will let you know how it goes.
Thanks Again.
Cheers,
Azbobs
Worked for me too
Worked for me as well. Thanks for the post.
Sent from my Sammy Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31329-imoseyon-test-leankernel-tw-82-v122-kexec/
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
SightSeeker said:
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Earl831SC said:
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My setting stay after rebooting so yes. I check with system tuner pro.
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
12bravo said:
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may have accidentally flashed the v12 of the kernel. On the thread on rootzwiki look under changelog and download v12.2 it should fix the LED issue.
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Bonus: A tad off topic, but I was wondering if anyone running the synergy roms replaced their touchwiz apps with aosp apps? Reason I ask is because I cannot live without the ICS email client and prefer the messaging client as well.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
sensui123 said:
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to play around with Google Now then go for 1.4. 1.5 will not require a wipe according to eschelon. I've found the battery life on 1.4 to be close to par with 1.3. Maybe a little more battery hungry, but not much.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
tmar23 said:
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are using the script it is option 4 to set max frequency for CPU1
Thanks, I had to force dual core mode for some reason, then it gave me the ability to change cpu1.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Related
Hello!
You probably already heard about the OC module by coolbho3000. It's really nice and most of the credits should go to him.
Last night I was checking the module's code and tweaking it, and today I want to release the changes I've made to it.
Basically, the changes are the following:
- Overclock up to 1.9GHz
- It also supports the following speeds: 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 GHz (with a voltage lower than 1300000uV)
- Code improved a little.
I've attached a ZIP file with the compiled module, a modified thermald.conf, and the source code.
Enjoy it!
Got a guide to install?
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
You can find a guide to install it in the original thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1665470
Waninkoko said:
You can find a guide to install it in the original thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1665470
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about you post instructions in the OP then?
This is good but you should add a link to original thread.
and like Reviewers said put the instructions in there
look forward to trying it
Does this Undervolt the stock cpu speeds? anyone got a module that only does just that, undervolts with no overclocks. I personally think the phone is snappy enough at the stock speeds and have no desire to overclock. but If i could undervolt it for more batt life at stock speeds i'd be all for it.
How is this working for everyone?
Sent from my Ville using XDA
Does this work on all ROMs?
Works fine mostly stable, some apps force close or just don't open at the max freq.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda premium
doktortaru said:
Does this Undervolt the stock cpu speeds? anyone got a module that only does just that, undervolts with no overclocks. I personally think the phone is snappy enough at the stock speeds and have no desire to overclock. but If i could undervolt it for more batt life at stock speeds i'd be all for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
The battery scripts in most of the custom roms out right now already include under clocking scripts, I thought. Noob here though.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda premium
enzomtrx said:
The battery scripts in most of the custom roms out right now already include under clocking scripts, I thought. Noob here though.
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
underclocking and undervolting are two entirely different things. also I haven't heard of a ROM that underclocks as that would affect performance (read: speed)
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
The Famous Waninkoko. Nice work with the mod. I hope you tackle other mods for the One S.
And kind of unrelated, but HUGE thanks for all your work on cIOS back in the day.
Ok found this in galaxy 3 section, but this is sopposed to work on any multi core phones. Thought I'd share this with u all since I came from g2x. All credit goes to Eugene 373 for making this script. Here its the op
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745132
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app.
Sorry if link isn't good but haven't made the 10 post yet. U can find this in the t-mobile section of the Samsung galaxy s3. Hope it works for u. Plz post results.
There is an apk in the op. U can just use that. Makes life a lot easier.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Isn't this the same if we lower our frequency to minimum when the screen goes off. I am sure only cpu0 is used if its below 750mhz or so.
double post, you just posted this in the development section as well
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748256
Yea I couldn't figure out how to delete one of the post.. mod can plz delete. Sorry guys
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
The G2x has no use for these quirks. Nvidia has some special battery saving things in the phone. That's why our phone does not use CPU governors. Just use the phone as is. You can over clock but don't set CPU profiles. The nvidia chip does everything itself.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
zoppp said:
The G2x has no use for these quirks. Nvidia has some special battery saving things in the phone. That's why our phone does not use CPU governors. Just use the phone as is. You can over clock but don't set CPU profiles. The nvidia chip does everything itself.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info, I never knew that, coming from other Android phones. I was wondering why no kernel had CPU governor options enabled.
zoppp said:
The G2x has no use for these quirks. Nvidia has some special battery saving things in the phone. That's why our phone does not use CPU governors. Just use the phone as is. You can over clock but don't set CPU profiles. The nvidia chip does everything itself.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can turn off the core though. Faux's latest cm7 kernel has it.
mormoney said:
There is an apk in the op. U can just use that. Makes life a lot easier.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do u have a link for the apk for the cpu1 disabler?
shortkidd96 said:
do u have a link for the apk for the cpu1 disabler?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry man but the apk was takin down for a bit.. somthing about the PID making the app shutdown after being off for so long. script still works, and is recommended for now. ill post when apk is back up
thx also what are the permissions for the script cause im using root explorer
which kernels do this already?
I am pretty sure that I was running on only one core when on Trinity ELP when setting it at 750 MHz and lower. Also, the newer Faux 050b6 through 050b9 go to a single core limited to no more than 503 MHz whenever the screen is off.
Is anyone aware if the Trinity T15 shuts down the second core ever?
How about the stock LG or standard CM kernel?
How about Faux's kernels for stock based ROM's? I have recently been on Kwes and Buru stock 2.3.4 ROM's using Faux 014b2 at stock voltage. If I keep the MHz low, I swear my battery performance is better than it ever was using undervolted ELP on CM7 based ROM's.
I just did 35 hours :victory: of moderate usage (about 2 hours talk, 3 hours wifi web, 1 hour text) and still had 45% left in the tank! - With the stock battery that's nearly a year old now...:good:
hairycheapo said:
I am pretty sure that I was running on only one core when on Trinity ELP when setting it at 750 MHz and lower. Also, the newer Faux 050b6 through 050b9 go to a single core limited to no more than 503 MHz whenever the screen is off.
Is anyone aware if the Trinity T15 shuts down the second core ever?
How about the stock LG or standard CM kernel?
How about Faux's kernels for stock based ROM's? I have recently been on Kwes and Buru stock 2.3.4 ROM's using Faux 014b2 at stock voltage. If I keep the MHz low, I swear my battery performance is better than it ever was using undervolted ELP on CM7 based ROM's.
I just did 35 hours :victory: of moderate usage (about 2 hours talk, 3 hours wifi web, 1 hour text) and still had 45% left in the tank! - With the stock battery that's nearly a year old now...:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, stock LG 2.3.4 had amazing battery life for me too.
What's the link for Fauxs kernels. I can't find it...damn beer. :beer:
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
http://faux.androidro.ms/
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
http://www20.zippyshare.com/v/15081794/file.html apk back up if any intrested
mormoney said:
http://www20.zippyshare.com/v/15081794/file.html apk back up if any intrested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks!!!:highfive:
http://www18.zippyshare.com/v/21371263/file.html
Apk update.... bunch of fixes, now puts one cpu down when on a call and more. Check out original thread for changelog
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Hey guys, I was running 1.782GHz for a while but I would get touch wiz freezing on me from time to time.
Do you guys think this is oc related?
I just reverted to one step lower than that, whatever it was.
Hopefully that fixes it.
I'm running sky ics rom and cymbaline kernel. Using an oc script.
Thanks!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
shawnj0 said:
Hey guys, I was running 1.782GHz for a while but I would get touch wiz freezing on me from time to time.
Do you guys think this is oc related?
I just reverted to one step lower than that, whatever it was.
Hopefully that fixes it.
I'm running sky ics rom and cymbaline kernel. Using an oc script.
Thanks!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It could be the voltage settings. If its not getting enough juice it can start to stall and worse case reboot. If you can rule that out it could also be GPU clocks if they're clocked too high.
I find that our skyrockets don't do well with mix and matching kernels and roms that haven't been tweaked to work together. You may want to try embryo 4.1 if using mohan's kernel. He write both and the integration is almost flawless, and the rom is a touchwiz base which helps our finicky skyrocket with stability. What do you need the overclock for?
Sent from my SGH-I727R
I really don't need the oc. I just wanted at least an oc since I love overclocking lol.
If I get any more problems with volts/oc ill see if I can edit the oc script to give more volts.
Thanks guys.
No problems thus far
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
fair enough, I don't really like to oc due to lack of cooling for these phones, and they seem to run best if not too over done. been using deadline for a governor though and find its far more stable and efficient (great battery/performance) than cfq, so that's my only other recommendation for cymbaline.
Sent from my SGH-I727R
robcore said:
been using deadline for a governor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually that is an I/O scheduler not a governor.
My bad, tis what I meant. But thnks for posting the clarification, the last thing i'd want to do is steer anyone in the wrong direction.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
IMO updated his TouchWiz kernel yesterday. Up until today I was using Scott's CleanKernel. Both are amazing kernels in my eyes. Both kernels are undervolted and overclocked. I had no issues with CleanKernel at all. I always seems to have bad battery life on the leanKernel until I flashed the updated .4 version this morning. Battery life seems much better compared to any leanKernel before the update. When running CleanKernel, I got a quadrant score of 4980. With leanKernel 0.4 I got 5160, both at stock 1.5GHz. I just want to see if others have noticed what I have between these two kernels.
You forgot that both are released in the Development section. A place where this thread does NOT belong...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
how do i move or delete it?
vx2ko said:
how do i move or delete it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
drbveb88 said:
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA needs more people like you. Great reply and it made sense.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
This was handled nicely, thanks guys!
In the future OP pay attention to where you post and
read forum rules and stickies before posting
Thread Moved
FNM
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
personally i like leankernal because of how light and simple it is. no unneccesary weight and battery life is great.
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
vx2ko said:
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Clienterror said:
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you on the kernel changing concept. And I have also noticed that .4 is much better than .3
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
buhohitr said:
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
vx2ko said:
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
buhohitr said:
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
vx2ko said:
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha.. you got it...almost.. Performance+battery life+stable=Clean. Super perfornance -less battery life - 10% stable=Lean kernel. Good luck bro.
ok I just setup an app profile in setcpu. so now everytime im in my game, its overclocked. When im using it normally, its at stock speed. With the screen off, its at min 190 and max 452. so far so good!
.5 is up now with more fixes.
http://rootzwiki.com/index.php?/topic/31329-[kernel][touchwiz]-Leankernel:-Minimalistic-Kernel-(8/28---v0.5)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Thanks for the heads up! More battery drain fixes. Although it says in order to revert back to stock we have to flash a ROM with a kernel. Would a nan backup work? Anyone tests the kernel yet
Post here for your feedback on what you would like to see in the future for the Lightning Zap! kernel.
I want to know what are the most widely used governors, io-schedulers and over/under clock voltages.
I'll post some of my ideas here in a bit to get things rolling
Does it need any more? Quite the nice kernel, sir. Thank you again for all your help with getting mine up and running. You've been a valuable resource for me.
I'd love to see the badass governor added. Otherwise, it's handled everything I have thrown at it with ease.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
smartass, sio and under volt were all I ever needed good sir. Your kernels always had the best deep sleep idle (1%)
car vs driver said:
Does it need any more? Quite the nice kernel, sir. Thank you again for all your help with getting mine up and running. You've been a valuable resource for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touche` good sir... anytime you need help, I am here man...
bps119 said:
I'd love to see the badass governor added. Otherwise, it's handled everything I have thrown at it with ease.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking adding badass, lulzactive and scorched and removing
ondemandx and vr io-scheduler
icenight89 said:
smartass, sio and under volt were all I ever needed good sir. Your kernels always had the best deep sleep idle (1%)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your support my friend...
Love the kernel sio/smartass combo is what I'm rocking...great battery life and super smooth keep up the great work. It makes it sooo hard to update to a new phone w the battery life I'm getting on my SR w this kernel and w Nibbles ROM. Any chance of you releasing a ROM of your own for the SR. I thought I read somewhere if you found the time you would cook something up for us...definitely would love that. Either way thanks for your hard work and time you put in for SR community we have greatly benefited from you
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Everything seems to be running great no problems at all. I have heard a little about the RoW scheduler any chance this could be included in future builds?
Running ur latest kernel on this settings: i/o scheduler-noop,interactive governor,OC to 1677mhz and voltage all -50...I get really good battery life and great performance with this settings.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
How about a "stripped down" version without any init.d tweaks?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
mindmajick said:
How about a "stripped down" version without any init.d tweaks?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or since u know what init.d tweaks are, and are one of the few who do lol, u could just manually remove them yourself from the zip before flashing... just sayin
True. But I'm not sure if any of them are necessary for a properly functioning kernel. I know I can get rid of most of them for sure. But not sure about the governor tweaks
Sent from my KFOT using Tapatalk 2
Day 2 on this kernel with Gs2usr's PACman rom. I'm on your recommended lionheart / noop, underclocked to 1026, and undervolted -50 across the board. So far I've gained 10% more battery life over the previous version on stock setup. It's been great so far man, thanks for showing up and providing the awesome kernel when we needed one so badly for the Skyrocket. You have been a true asset to the community since you've been here. Can't wait to see what you've got in store for us with this.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
mindmajick said:
True. But I'm not sure if any of them are necessary for a properly functioning kernel. I know I can get rid of most of them for sure. But not sure about the governor tweaks
Sent from my KFOT using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can remove all the init.d scripts, but they are still part of the Lightning Zap! Project that are necessary for making this kernel what it is... beside, removing the scripts wouldn't make the size of the kernel much smaller, just shrink it a few kb...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
thomas.raines said:
You can remove all the init.d scripts, but they are still part of the Lightning Zap! Project that are necessary for making this kernel what it is... beside, removing the scripts wouldn't make the size of the kernel much smaller, just shrink it a few kb...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh. It wasn't for size. Just playing with my own scripts and no need to have multiple scripts doing similar things
Sent from my KFOT using Tapatalk 2
mindmajick said:
Oh. It wasn't for size. Just playing with my own scripts and no need to have multiple scripts doing similar things
Sent from my KFOT using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gotcha...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Can I use lighting zap kernel with sky jelly bean?
intelxtreme said:
Can I use lighting zap kernel with sky jelly bean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe so bc of the build date. Someone correct me if I am wrong
-------------------------------------------------
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 with Chimera 3.0
-----------Nexus 7 running AOKP PUB-----------
Mike on XDA said:
I don't believe so bc of the build date. Someone correct me if I am wrong
-------------------------------------------------
Sent from my Skyrocket i727 with Chimera 3.0
-----------Nexus 7 running AOKP PUB-----------
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on the version, I believe the T11 base was built after October 14th so it should work. Just run a nandroid backup and try it. Worst that can happen is that it won't boot.
Slightly under clocked, noop i/o, interactive. Undervolted 100 across the board. Also running v6 script by zeppelinrox, along with seeder. Vincom superlite v8 with the LZ kernel. Awesome battery life. Thanks for all you do.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Hey u want to know what kind of governors ppl want so I like my battery life any gov that steps up fairly slow and drop quickly I love lulactive but if I remember right it doesn't play nice with our CPU. So anything that has good battery life.