Ok found this in galaxy 3 section, but this is sopposed to work on any multi core phones. Thought I'd share this with u all since I came from g2x. All credit goes to Eugene 373 for making this script. Here its the op
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1745132
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app.
Sorry if link isn't good but haven't made the 10 post yet. U can find this in the t-mobile section of the Samsung galaxy s3. Hope it works for u. Plz post results.
There is an apk in the op. U can just use that. Makes life a lot easier.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Isn't this the same if we lower our frequency to minimum when the screen goes off. I am sure only cpu0 is used if its below 750mhz or so.
double post, you just posted this in the development section as well
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748256
Yea I couldn't figure out how to delete one of the post.. mod can plz delete. Sorry guys
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
The G2x has no use for these quirks. Nvidia has some special battery saving things in the phone. That's why our phone does not use CPU governors. Just use the phone as is. You can over clock but don't set CPU profiles. The nvidia chip does everything itself.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
zoppp said:
The G2x has no use for these quirks. Nvidia has some special battery saving things in the phone. That's why our phone does not use CPU governors. Just use the phone as is. You can over clock but don't set CPU profiles. The nvidia chip does everything itself.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info, I never knew that, coming from other Android phones. I was wondering why no kernel had CPU governor options enabled.
zoppp said:
The G2x has no use for these quirks. Nvidia has some special battery saving things in the phone. That's why our phone does not use CPU governors. Just use the phone as is. You can over clock but don't set CPU profiles. The nvidia chip does everything itself.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can turn off the core though. Faux's latest cm7 kernel has it.
mormoney said:
There is an apk in the op. U can just use that. Makes life a lot easier.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do u have a link for the apk for the cpu1 disabler?
shortkidd96 said:
do u have a link for the apk for the cpu1 disabler?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry man but the apk was takin down for a bit.. somthing about the PID making the app shutdown after being off for so long. script still works, and is recommended for now. ill post when apk is back up
thx also what are the permissions for the script cause im using root explorer
which kernels do this already?
I am pretty sure that I was running on only one core when on Trinity ELP when setting it at 750 MHz and lower. Also, the newer Faux 050b6 through 050b9 go to a single core limited to no more than 503 MHz whenever the screen is off.
Is anyone aware if the Trinity T15 shuts down the second core ever?
How about the stock LG or standard CM kernel?
How about Faux's kernels for stock based ROM's? I have recently been on Kwes and Buru stock 2.3.4 ROM's using Faux 014b2 at stock voltage. If I keep the MHz low, I swear my battery performance is better than it ever was using undervolted ELP on CM7 based ROM's.
I just did 35 hours :victory: of moderate usage (about 2 hours talk, 3 hours wifi web, 1 hour text) and still had 45% left in the tank! - With the stock battery that's nearly a year old now...:good:
hairycheapo said:
I am pretty sure that I was running on only one core when on Trinity ELP when setting it at 750 MHz and lower. Also, the newer Faux 050b6 through 050b9 go to a single core limited to no more than 503 MHz whenever the screen is off.
Is anyone aware if the Trinity T15 shuts down the second core ever?
How about the stock LG or standard CM kernel?
How about Faux's kernels for stock based ROM's? I have recently been on Kwes and Buru stock 2.3.4 ROM's using Faux 014b2 at stock voltage. If I keep the MHz low, I swear my battery performance is better than it ever was using undervolted ELP on CM7 based ROM's.
I just did 35 hours :victory: of moderate usage (about 2 hours talk, 3 hours wifi web, 1 hour text) and still had 45% left in the tank! - With the stock battery that's nearly a year old now...:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, stock LG 2.3.4 had amazing battery life for me too.
What's the link for Fauxs kernels. I can't find it...damn beer. :beer:
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
http://faux.androidro.ms/
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
http://www20.zippyshare.com/v/15081794/file.html apk back up if any intrested
mormoney said:
http://www20.zippyshare.com/v/15081794/file.html apk back up if any intrested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks!!!:highfive:
http://www18.zippyshare.com/v/21371263/file.html
Apk update.... bunch of fixes, now puts one cpu down when on a call and more. Check out original thread for changelog
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Related
Already? Or this old news?
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/thunderbolt-hacks/136976-officially-overclocked.html
Dlnp22 said:
Already? Or this old news?
http://www.droidforums.net/forum/thunderbolt-hacks/136976-officially-overclocked.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to ROM manager and download OC
It's not there anymore.
Yea I wonder why iit was pulled. Worked great for me...
Thankfully, if it was already downloaded, it's still in your clockworkmod/ folder. Rejoice, those who have already downloaded it.
Direct download link is in that thread.
been running it at 1.4 since last night and loving every minute of it. runs greats, not one problem..
rulevoid said:
Yea I wonder why iit was pulled. Worked great for me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Found out through twitter that the dev does not want anyone to distribute his kernel through the forums. However, if you ask nicely then you may receive.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Follow him on Twitter and go through his tweets. He has a link for his kernels there. Even one for his 1.8ghz kernel
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Twitter name?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
bhazard451 said:
Twitter name?
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His twitter name is Drod2169
twitter.com/drod2169
Interesting. I'm not seeing much of a difference. Quadrant scores went from 1611 on adryn's 1.8 kernel to 1789 on the 1.5ghz. Seems very low for both. Wonder what's giving me issues...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
I get 2200+ on quadrant at 1.5ghz.. and 2700+ at 1.8ghz using Drod's kernels..
Can't wait to try his 1.9+ kernels soon
This is absolute insanity, I can't believe this but I was running this kernel to the max (1.5ghz) and the performance was insane. 2200 - 2500 quadrant scores (even one 2532). Well, drained my battery to 15% after about 3 hrs using "ondemand" scaling. So I flashed adrenelyn's 1.9, phone ran perfectly smoothly but I wasn't happy anymore with kernel scores in the 17's and 18's. So I reflashed drod's kernel and have been running at 1209 mhz (2064, 2216, 2092 quads.), phone is still super responsive and it is now 2 in the morning, I have been running it since roughly2pm and I have 37% battery left 12 hrs. later (ondemand). I have been using the crap out of this phone: 2.5 hrs. phone calls, 1.5 web time, texts all day, followed twitter, did some theme changes. I found my go to kernel for now.
Tried the 1.8 but SetCpu widget kept reporting 1.8 even after I slowed it down. Going into the app I could tell it was follow my settings. Went back to 1.5. Temp to high for me even though stable. I might try conservative setting if widget reports right.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
houseboatwayne said:
Tried the 1.8 but SetCpu widget kept reporting 1.8 even after I slowed it down. Going into the app I could tell it was follow my settings. Went back to 1.5. Temp to high for me even though stable. I might try conservative setting if widget reports right.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to disable the Perflock disabler in SetCPU options and you can downclock it
where is this 1.8ghz kernel?
Diversion said:
You have to disable the Perflock disabler in SetCPU options and you can downclock it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the 1.8 is the same as the 1.5 you don't need to disable Perflock. It has already been been disabled.
Edit: I just read in drod2169 Twitter that in order to lower the clock speed on the 1.8 you do need to disable the Perflock...sorry.
Is there an app that will work to control voltage on ICS yet?
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA
Nstools
Link - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1333696
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
ROM Toolbox Pro also allows you too modify these settings.
Or setcpu
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Do these require specific kernels to work?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Yes , not all kernels allow change voltages
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Voltage adjustment is not really necessary, unless you are increasing voltages for overclocking.
NStools is a Nexus user favorite, powerful, and free.
Braneless said:
Voltage adjustment is not really necessary, unless you are increasing voltages for overclocking.
NStools is a Nexus user favorite, powerful, and free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Voltage adjustment is necessary when UVing so you can save battery duh??? lol
Even when overclocking.
XxLostSoulxX said:
Voltage adjustment is necessary when UVing so you can save battery duh??? lol
Even when overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhh, no. I suggest you read up on the findings/observations documented by multiple kernel developers and bedalus's kernel testing posted here. UV has no effect on power consumption.
Read first post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1448900
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Braneless said:
Uhh, no. I suggest you read up on the findings/observations documented by multiple kernel developers and bedalus's kernel testing posted here. UV has no effect on power consumption.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I tested it on my friends nexus s 4g and my epic 4g and with a lot of UVing. Lemme further explain.
Okay when you UV it just uses less amount of voltage on that frequency so in essence you save battery because not as much voltage is being used. Now however if you UV by a lot like -100mV and higher the phone will lagg a bit. If you overvolt your pushing more voltage to the phone which is more power being used.
I just tested my phone freqs. Used were 100,200,400,600,800,1000 And all were UVed by -100mV and playing games and using lower freqs it will lagg. When I didn't UV at all it never lagged.
Not to mention BTW I was @ 88% before and it only took me 2 mins to post this and now I'm at 86% with no UV at all. And last post before this I took me same time with UVed I went from 95% to 95% lol.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
XxLostSoulxX said:
Voltage adjustment is necessary when UVing so you can save battery duh??? lol
Even when overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not according to my testing.
kernels ; battery ; ROM ; gov/sched
Now with summaries in the first posts. Convenient for XDA app users!
bedalus said:
Not according to my testing.
kernels ; battery ; ROM ; gov/sched
Now with summaries in the first posts. Convenient for XDA app users!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I can say every phone is a tad bit diff. But for whatever reason no matter who's phone when I UV if the phone handles it it. It saves me battery I want you to test this and see.
Run whatever scheduler and say performance run 100 MHz by -200mV like and 200 Mhz by -150mV and so forth. Play GtA 3 and watch when UVed it laggs and when Not it laggs stillbut not as bad. I mean hell even 1.5GHz no UV I still lagg haha
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Thanks guys! Ill check on this some more when I get home.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
This is what I did too and it's working wonders.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Good News on Thx 4 the post
jrichards2007 said:
I tried to reply to the main thread in the development thread for SynergyROM, but as I do not have the 10 posts required, I figured I'd put it here. If this is against the rules, please let me know and remove this.
Apparently the busybox install on 1.4 is a little botched, and as such, when you install LeanKernel 12.2, it doesn't run the scripts it needs to in order to run it's magic.
All you need to do to get it to work again is fix the install of busybox on your phone. You can download busybox from the Play store and install it to your phone, and after that, installing the kernel should be relatively easy.
I've been running 12.2 on my phone for the better part of today at work and have had no issues with it at all.
I'd attach a link as proof, but apparently I can't do that either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for your post and gr8 find on the busybox
I have been trying to decide which one to load
SynergyROM 1.3
or
SynergyROM 1.5
Now I know that imo 12.2 will work
long as the busybox is loaded first.
due to the issues with 12.2 loop booting.
Now I can load 1.4 will let you know how it goes.
Thanks Again.
Cheers,
Azbobs
Worked for me too
Worked for me as well. Thanks for the post.
Sent from my Sammy Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31329-imoseyon-test-leankernel-tw-82-v122-kexec/
mpetruzz said:
Where is the kernel thread??
Ill give this a shot today.
Any sense as to battery life with the new kernel??
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
SightSeeker said:
^ Also would like to know this. I was seeing some signs of worse battery life on 1.4. I'd like to know if the kernel + 1.4 is better battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Earl831SC said:
I am running Imoseyons 12-2 kernel with the cpu editor script using battery saver and notice a considerable difference in battery life.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1584508
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know what exactly it is scaling at? Also what does the 12-2 kernel do vs the script? Does the kernel alone underclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
SightSeeker said:
Do you know if the sticky mode works?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My setting stay after rebooting so yes. I check with system tuner pro.
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
12bravo said:
After flashing this kernel over Synergy 1.4, I have a blue led light that will not turn off. Any ideas?
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may have accidentally flashed the v12 of the kernel. On the thread on rootzwiki look under changelog and download v12.2 it should fix the LED issue.
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Bonus: A tad off topic, but I was wondering if anyone running the synergy roms replaced their touchwiz apps with aosp apps? Reason I ask is because I cannot live without the ICS email client and prefer the messaging client as well.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
sensui123 said:
Want to post in the synergy thread but now enough post counts -_-
Anyone can think of a compelling reason to not jump for synergy 1.4 with the lean kernel 12.2 and wait for synergy 1.5 instead? Eschelon made it sound like it would drop soon and I'm just trying to gauge from the comments on the synergy thread if there are major problems.....main things that bother me are battery life degradation claims and 4G speed variances.
Thanks for the heads up from everyone confirming the busybox issue with 1.4 to be compatible with 12.2 lean kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to play around with Google Now then go for 1.4. 1.5 will not require a wipe according to eschelon. I've found the battery life on 1.4 to be close to par with 1.3. Maybe a little more battery hungry, but not much.
Earl831SC said:
The battery saver from the script sets the max frequency on the cpus to 1134000. This can be changed in the script as well. I run the batter saver but change the max frequency to 1350000 for both cores. I do not believe the kernel has underclocking abilities currently, but I may be wrong. Definitely snappier with the kernel than without. The combination of the two is excellent.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
tmar23 said:
I set cpu0 to 1350000, but I can't figure out how to set cpu1? I am new to kernels, can you tell me how you set the second cpu to 1350000?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are using the script it is option 4 to set max frequency for CPU1
Thanks, I had to force dual core mode for some reason, then it gave me the ability to change cpu1.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
I have a Skyrocket phone, running Sky ICS... and I've been trying to find out why cpu1 is off most of the time.
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpuidle/state0/time = 534677824
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpuidle/state1/time = 0
When I echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
And then cat the file back, the setting is zero.
How do I set it online? Is it possible?
Thanks in advance,
I flashed the a different kernel with Sky-ics and I use CPU tuner it shows I'm running both cpu's. I believe the ics update was to enable both cpu's anyway but then again I'm new to this and still in the process of learning haha give cpu tuner a shot hope any of this was helpful.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Ok. Which kernel did you flash? I'll give it a shot.
Loddy87 said:
I flashed the a different kernel with Sky-ics and I use CPU tuner it shows I'm running both cpu's. I believe the ics update was to enable both cpu's anyway but then again I'm new to this and still in the process of learning haha give cpu tuner a shot hope any of this was helpful.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1701189 Runs smooth with the rom.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Yeah, I rejected Mohan CYMBALINE because the NFC stuff wasn't working well.
I'll have to keep an eye out for it.
Loddy87 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1701189 Runs smooth with the rom.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh see ya in not to worried about the NFC stuff right now I live in a state where everyone moves backwards electronically haha.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
CPU...
Most of the time you probably don't want the other CPU running. 1 CPU is more than enough for most apps and tasks. I know Instigators Kernel basically shuts down one of the CPU's unless you need it. I am sure if you updated to the kernel in seans thread it also mods the CPU Governor. ICS by default has both CPU's going all the time.
So having 1 of the CPU's off is one of the benefits of modding. It saves precious battery. If you get a program such as CPU Spy, you should hover around 192 mhz when using the phone for light tasks. 1200+ is more graphic intense. If you start doing video and games, CPU #2 kicks in to help...
To change this setting on most roms, goto system settings>Performance>Processor and change the Governor type to one that suits your needs. I use Instigators Kernel with the Badass Script and I get AWESOME battery life and sit on 192 mhz most of the time and notice NO DIFFERENCE in the speed of the phone...
Hope that helps... if so, give me a Thanks...
If you punch CPU 1 in its kiniggits it will fire right up
Sent from my SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
I'm programming an NFC application so it's needed at this time...
Loddy87 said:
Ahh see ya in not to worried about the NFC stuff right now I live in a state where everyone moves backwards electronically haha.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other cpu only comes online when it's needed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
I guess you can consider this thread part survey and part for my knowledge so I know how far I can push this phone. I am at 1728MHz max with the interactive governor and cfq scheduler. Not sure if I'm going to do any undervolting, I can get through the day with about 40% remaining, and I have profiles set up for low battery and such. I am running CM10 with the 747 (I think that's what its called..) kernel and can push it to 2.1GHz. Is it stable at that high of a clockspeed? I can assume it turns your pretty Galaxy S3 into a convenient portable stove
By the way, sorry if this is the wrong section.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
It really depends on your phone, I had mine at 2100 and it was stable. However it can very I had,a, Droid charge that ran the 1440 no problem, had it replaced and the new one could go above 1300 without hot boots. Some phones just hold up better
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
kintwofan said:
It really depends on your phone, I had mine at 2100 and it was stable. However it can very I had,a, Droid charge that ran the 1440 no problem, had it replaced and the new one could go above 1300 without hot boots. Some phones just hold up better
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock. I've had it clocked to 1.9. But can't tell a difference with real day to day function except for worse battery drain and phone hotter.
Sent from a SYNERGIZED GalaxySIII
I have run the KT747 AOSP kernel at 2.1 ghz for a day or more and had no noticeable increase in heat, or decrease in battery life. (lulzactive or smartass v2 with either cfq or sio scheduler, no voltage changes in KT tweaker) I also saw very little or no gain in real world performance increase, and the benchmarking apps seemed to back that up. Typically run mine at 1.809 currently. Every phone cpu is different in terms of top speed, and voltage settings. Best thing to do, is to test them and see what works best for you. These 2 links, courtesy of the Ktoonez thread, provide some great info on kernel governor and scheduler settings. Given the number of options in KT Tweaker, these helped me a great deal in terms of making changes.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1687578
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817
I've tried 1998MHz and as you said, it didn't yield much. I think I screwed something up, because now oc settings refuse to stick (resets itself to 1512) and short/long benches are not as great.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
xrawritsjack said:
I've tried 1998MHz and as you said, it didn't yield much. I think I screwed something up, because now oc settings refuse to stick (resets itself to 1512) and short/long benches are not as great.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you on CleanKernel by chance?