Database Info

Core Player 1.2 -- No serial needed

Hi,
Core Player 1.2 --
http://www.coreplayer.com/
GK

no warez here,, this is not free software.
gvijayaratnam said:
Hi,
Core Player 1.2 -- No serial needed
http://www.coreplayer.com/
GK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Core Player 1.2
Is this a joke or what? This cost $29.99.

stupid thread.

The original link in the first post was pointing to a cracked version of Core Player. A Mod has edited the link to point to the official Core Player site.

Thread should be closed and removed. Warez is not alowed and this thread is dumb.

On the other hand, people post warez links here ALL the time by posting ROMs.
Beyond that many ROMs contain software that carriers/manufacturers need to pay for and people install these ROMs on phones that did not come with the corresponding software pre-installed.
Just because this software is not available as a seperate purchase and doesn't require activation/serial etc. doesn't mean that it's not "warez".

if u knew how to get free soda out of machine i'm sure u'd do it.
same idea with warez.

undac said:
On the other hand, people post warez links here ALL the time by posting ROMs.
Beyond that many ROMs contain software that carriers/manufacturers need to pay for and people install these ROMs on phones that did not come with the corresponding software pre-installed.
Just because this software is not available as a seperate purchase and doesn't require activation/serial etc. doesn't mean that it's not "warez".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm...people don't sell ROM's on here however.

why pay $30 when you can get it for free. the only people who are complaining are the ones who paid for it and now they feel dumb. and honestly it is overpriced anyways.

I'm gonna put my flamesuit on.
Feel dumb? Nah. I supported development of a program that takes advantage of features of my phone that HTC wouldn't give me and the CoreCodec team had to reverse engineer.
You're a criminal.
So no, I don't feel dumb, I feel like I spent my $21.99 wisely - that's what, about 15 minutes of defense lawyer time?

lildogg said:
why pay $30 when you can get it for free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it is illegal. Duh!
It's called having morals and doing the right thing. Try it sometime.
MODS - Pls close this thread.

maybe his morals are worth less than $30

AllTheWay said:
Ummm...people don't sell ROM's on here however.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, did this guy try to sell a warez copy of CorePlayer? If not, I cannot see the relevance in your reply.

The Difference...
The Admin & Moderators spend a lot of time discussing this exact issue and there is a difference between Roms (and the software that is included in them) and cracked commercial software.
First, Cooked Roms allow us to customized our Operating Systems which we have a license to use. It's similiar to adding/removing features from our desktops OS except because of the embedded nature of our devices the process is more involved. Don't want Office Mobile the only wayto remove it is cook a Rom.
Second, usually the applications included in the Rom are not commercial applications. Here is GPS Tool or Quick GPS available for purchase? Even when a commercial application is included in a Rom it isn't a version that is commercially avaliable; look at the taster version of TomTom and Cyberon Voice Dialer/Commader. I belive that the version of Sprite Back-up included in the at&t Roms is also a different version which won't upgrade using the commercial versions.
We acknowledge that we are in a gray area legally and as such we have to be very stringent about what we do and don't allow. If we become a Warez site then XDA-Developers will surely close down or loose all of the good that it currently offers simply to provide Warez.
Also as a community of DEVELOPERS we are as a community against stealing from developers.
It is a fine line we walk but in the end it is up to you our forum members to help us walk this line or abandon us as we refuse to allow WAREZ.

lildogg said:
why pay $30 when you can get it for free. the only people who are complaining are the ones who paid for it and now they feel dumb. and honestly it is overpriced anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must be the same guy that thinks it's okay to take someones car when they leave the keys in it... ...cause you got the car for free
I did actually buy quite some software. But when it comes to playing videos I still use TCPMP instead of CorePlayer. And guess what, that's freeware!

lildogg said:
why pay $30 when you can get it for free. the only people who are complaining are the ones who paid for it and now they feel dumb. and honestly it is overpriced anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir, are an IDIOT! I can get anything for free & I'm certain I know of more sources than you could ever dream of. That said, while there are certian thing that are limited trials, or have no trial version & I will usually download to test those. Just like SK Tools, which is a great app, so I PURCHASED IT.
Guess what, if everybody was a scumbag thief like you, developers would stop making the programs you use. So it's because of us so called "stupid" people, that you can even cheat the system. Think about it idiot! If everyone was stealing your $hit, you'd stop making it, right?
So think before you open your pie hole Jacka$$, I know that's hard for many people.

very well said!

[Q] Problem with Market license.

Hi guys,
I am new to this world of android and have been downloading paid apps through fourshared as suggested by a friend. It worked completely fine until last week when the android market got updated.
Now every time I try to update a paid app through market or install a paid app which I have downloaded for free through fourshared, an error comes up saying I cannot do that operation since I`ve not purchased it.
On the other hand, my friend (who has the same phone) still uses fourshared to download all the paid apps for free in spite of the android market update.
can somebody please help me out of this?

namansanghavi said:
hi guys,
i am new to this world of android and have been downloading paid apps through fourshared as suggested by a friend. It worked completely fine until last week when the android market got updated.
Now every time i try to update a paid app through market or install a paid app which i have downloaded for free through fourshared, an error comes up saying i cannot do that operation since i`ve not purchased it.
On the other hand, my friend (who has the same phone) still uses fourshared to download all the paid apps for free in spite of the android market update.
Can somebody please help me out of this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
warez are not to be shared or discussed in this forum, thanks!

namansanghavi said:
Hi guys,
I am new to this world of android and have been downloading paid apps through fourshared as suggested by a friend. It worked completely fine until last week when the android market got updated.
Now every time I try to update a paid app through market or install a paid app which I have downloaded for free through fourshared, an error comes up saying I cannot do that operation since I`ve not purchased it.
On the other hand, my friend (who has the same phone) still uses fourshared to download all the paid apps for free in spite of the android market update.
can somebody please help me out of this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please read the forum rules:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, either pay or find your cracks and serials somewhere else. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained.
Discussing warez or asking for help with warez will not be tolerated on XDA.

Most used Art creation app

Keep seeing posts about what apps do you use (I've posted a few myself). Thought I'd do a poll so that other new comers can quickly assess what the most popular options are instead of purchasing many different apps.

DEleted

hertsjoatmon said:
found a copy of adobe ideas ideas <warez url> seems to work fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like your promoting piracy here... Since I do some Android development and have always respected the work of developers, I gotta report you and hope you get banned.
Maybe you should learn to write apps, pour your time and energy into it in hopes of making some money only to have people pirate it.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 2

hertsjoatmon said:
found a copy of adobe ideas ideas <snip>.com
seems to work fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xda forum rules:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community.

I completely understand and support the policy here.
However, I believe this was an innocent mistake. I certainly hope the OP doesn't get banned for it... All that's needed is a friendly reminder of the rules and clear warning not to do it again.
No need to crucify the guy for being unaware.

can't be innocent. that's from known warez site.

madsquabbles said:
can't be innocent. that's from known warez site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[could not stop myself:] How would _you_ know?

Apologies. I wasn't thinking. It's an app I really wanted to try as the reviews sounded good. As it's no longer available for Purchase, I didn't think it would be a problem as I see threads on here with links for apps ported from other devices such as super note

p107r0 said:
xda forum rules:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apologies. If it was available to purchase I would purchase it. That was the only place I could find it. If some one can link a source where I can pay for it, I will do gladly.

hertsjoatmon said:
Apologies. If it was available to purchase I would purchase it. That was the only place I could find it. If some one can link a source where I can pay for it, I will do gladly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to bash you anymore, so apart from any ethical considerations...
Reality is - until you advertise it - nobody here knows and cares how you obtained your apps.
The practical dimension is more important and really simple - if we want xda to exist, let's not provide grounds for piracy promotion accusations.
The rest is between you and your conscience (and copyright enforcement agencies I might add).

p107r0 said:
Not to bash you anymore, so apart from any ethical considerations...
Reality is - until you advertise it - nobody here knows and cares how you obtained your apps.
The practical dimension is more important and really simple - if we want xda to exist, let's not provide grounds for piracy promotion accusations.
The rest is between you and your conscience (and copyright enforcement agencies I might add).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So should I request others be band for posting links to apps that aren't available to note 8.0 users as it isn't available via legitimate sources? The first guy to suggest I get band got vcl via an alternate source as well as supernote. Yes the site I suggested is unethical but how is that different to people posting a link to Dropbox?
I appreciate that what I did was wrong, but I take offence to be accused of not supporting developers. I've deleted the post and I'm willing to pay for the app if someone can suggest a way for me to do so.

ExploreMN said:
Sounds like your promoting piracy here... Since I do some Android development and have always respected the work of developers, I gotta report you and hope you get banned.
Maybe you should learn to write apps, pour your time and energy into it in hopes of making some money only to have people pirate it.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. While I appreciate I made a mistake with my suggestion, by downloading supernote on here, aren't you undermining Asus who have the rights to it? I'm just trying to understand where the moral lines are? Getting an app that is no longer distributed anywhere is wrong, but getting an app that is exclusive to a particular vendor?

Sorry for all my posts in this thread. I enjoy contributing to these forums. I've learnt a lot on here and like to help others where I can. I just don't want to get banned for suggesting sourcing an app that is no longer available

hertsjoatmon said:
So should I request others be band for posting links to apps that aren't available to note 8.0 users as it isn't available via legitimate sources? The first guy to suggest I get band got vcl via an alternate source as well as supernote. Yes the site I suggested is unethical but how is that different to people posting a link to Dropbox?
I appreciate that what I did was wrong, but I take offence to be accused of not supporting developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's not get into defensive mode, small missteps happen to everybody now and then. Nevertheless "everybody does that..." does not provide valid reason for anything.
It's not about yours, mine on anybody else's excuse on getting stuff in shady ways, it's about not advertising the fact on xda. Nothing more than that.
I'm sorry you had to learn that in rather unpleasant way.
hertsjoatmon said:
I've deleted the post and I'm willing to pay for the app if someone can suggest a way for me to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for removing that post. Really.

hertsjoatmon said:
So should I request others be band for posting links to apps that aren't available to note 8.0 users as it isn't available via legitimate sources? The first guy to suggest I get band got vcl via an alternate source as well as supernote. Yes the site I suggested is unethical but how is that different to people posting a link to Dropbox?
I appreciate that what I did was wrong, but I take offence to be accused of not supporting developers. I've deleted the post and I'm willing to pay for the app if someone can suggest a way for me to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for this post up front because I know it causes more drama but....
Even though I agree with the warez link not being posted here on XDA you make a strong point. The question is where does the line get drawn? Take the hotpot mods for example. They are allowing one to get something for free that usually is only obtainable through an additional monthly fee.
My opinion is these things should be decided by Moderators and not members because both sides have an argument when it comes to this. Best practice is to report the post and let them make the decision on what is best for XDA. When members confront other members a lot of times it has a tendency to get a bit ugly.

It's a shame this thread got side tracked so soon, I was hoping to promote discussion on the pros and cons of particular favoured apps . Wishlists of features and promotion of the lesser known apps for people wishing to experiment

hertsjoatmon said:
It's a shame this thread got side tracked so soon, I was hoping to promote discussion on the pros and cons of particular favoured apps . Wishlists of features and promotion of the lesser known apps for people wishing to experiment
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be a great thread. Why not start a new one? Perhaps this one can get renamed.
Sent from my GT-N5100 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Sometime during the week, I'm going to start an open google document to do a table of the apps listed on here and the features that each one has.
max resolution. max layers. export jpeg. export png. vector. brush types. layer options. duplicate, merge, colour, overlay, multiply, mask. blend took. dodge / burn tool. flip. grid overlay etc etc.
I will post a link once I have it up and hope that you can help in filling it in. These apps are all getting updates and i'm losing track of what has what functionality. Ideally, id like to minimise the amount i need to go in and out of various apps and this table should help me decide which ones best complement each other.

with out a blend / smudge tool. sketchbook pro is off of my short list. I can import my psd file from layerpaint into it, which is great but with out the smudge tool it makes colouring far to difficult.
both artflow and infinite painter have this option but I can figure out a way to open a psd file from a different application in them which is really frustrating.

looks like clover paint can both import and export in psd, it has unlimited canvas size and layers and also includes a blend tool... It's just made it to top of my list of apps to try.
I emailed the artflow dev and was told there is no plans in the near future to support psd import

About a closed thread..

Just my thoughts on this topic
(IM NOT TRYING TO BE OFFENSIVE)
xposed framework can be used to turn lucky patcher into a patcher on absalute crackcocain...... is xposed framework less illegal than lucky patcher? I DO NOT USE EITHER TO CRACK APPS AND I NEVER WOULD
I USE BOTH TO BLOCK ILLEGAL CORPERATE REMOTE USE OF MY CELLPHONE.... furthermore adware=logger and that is also illegal imo....
the topic: (I wont post the link because its 'closed' and i would like this topic to remain open, but this is why it was closed)
I read the thread and its not telling people to use my favorite app to hack... i paid for an app the other day that was only .99 cents but i installed the key apk first and didnt get it off gplay i was going to contact the developer about the problem but just used the fix in this topic lol.........
"Thread closed..
Discussion on lucky patcher which can be used to bypass licence verification on paid apps which is against XDA rules
Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community"
1.) You are wrong if you think hacking means cracking
2.) You are wrong if you think the app in question is not helpfull to developing. (Thats why i use it........)
3.) You are VERY VERY wrong if you think intelegence is not the main factor in bypassing licence
4.) Youu are wrong if you think bypassing licenses is always illegal locally.
5.) You are wrong if you imply licenses are always legal
6.) Google play does a plethora of illegal things of which are publicly documented. (hence why people crack them)
7.) You are blind if you think what xda does, does not CRACK various aspects of the android platform and much much more.
8.) Hacking in general (not cracking) will always and INHERENTLY lead us to choices... let people make those choices... because some people think that what google does is illegal and that they should be cracked...
.
I can keep going on and list to 100, but ill finish with this.
Thanks to you lots and lots of people will use this app to crack apps.... removing UNUSED odex files is NOT inherent to cracking apps.... so ironic.... I might be a big noob, but ive programmed since i was a little kid and the functions of this app are a godsend to DEVELOPING.
p.s. to developers.... notice how you already learned something?

leathan said:
Just my thoughts on this topic
(IM NOT TRYING TO BE OFFENSIVE)
xposed framework can be used to turn lucky patcher into a patcher on absalute crackcocain...... is xposed framework less illegal than lucky patcher? I DO NOT USE EITHER TO CRACK APPS AND I NEVER WOULD
I USE BOTH TO BLOCK ILLEGAL CORPERATE REMOTE USE OF MY CELLPHONE.... furthermore adware=logger and that is also illegal imo....
the topic: (I wont post the link because its 'closed' and i would like this topic to remain open, but this is why it was closed)
I read the thread and its not telling people to use my favorite app to hack... i paid for an app the other day that was only .99 cents but i installed the key apk first and didnt get it off gplay i was going to contact the developer about the problem but just used the fix in this topic lol.........
"Thread closed..
Discussion on lucky patcher which can be used to bypass licence verification on paid apps which is against XDA rules
Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community"
1.) You are wrong if you think hacking means cracking
2.) You are wrong if you think the app in question is not helpfull to developing. (Thats why i use it........)
3.) You are VERY VERY wrong if you think intelegence is not the main factor in bypassing licence
4.) Youu are wrong if you think bypassing licenses is always illegal locally.
5.) You are wrong if you imply licenses are always legal
6.) Google play does a plethora of illegal things of which are publicly documented. (hence why people crack them)
7.) You are blind if you think what xda does, does not CRACK various aspects of the android platform and much much more.
8.) Hacking in general (not cracking) will always and INHERENTLY lead us to choices... let people make those choices... because some people think that what google does is illegal and that they should be cracked...
.
I can keep going on and list to 100, but ill finish with this.
Thanks to you lots and lots of people will use this app to crack apps.... removing UNUSED odex files is NOT inherent to cracking apps.... so ironic.... I might be a big noob, but ive programmed since i was a little kid and the functions of this app are a godsend to DEVELOPING.
p.s. to developers.... notice how you already learned something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really......... xposed framework is 10000000 times better in regards to "illegally cracking"... I can do some things which before hand required actual coding.... please dont hate this app its got so many good features that are promoted on xda...
or is xda now on the side of MASSIVE spam overhead? it wasnt when i use to post here 5+ years back...

A question about the fortnite galaxy skin..

Fortnite android beta was just released, along with a new skin for note 9 and tab s4 users. Is there any way I can edit my build.prop to let me get that new skin? If not are there any other ways it may be plausible to get the skin. I have root and twrp.

elwiniscool said:
Fortnite android beta was just released, along with a new skin for note 9 and tab s4 users. Is there any way I can edit my build.prop to let me get that new skin? If not are there any other ways it may be plausible to get the skin. I have root and twrp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you want to avoid paying for that skin , this is considered as a warez request .
And warez request are forbidden on those forums.
Moreover I don't think that build.prop tweak will work with this game .
6. Do not post or request warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit members to request, post, promote or describe ways in which warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained or used. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

RaiZProduction said:
Since you want to avoid paying for that skin , this is considered as a warez request .
And warez request are forbidden on those forums.
Moreover I don't think that build.prop tweak will work with this game .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When i posted that i didnt really think about it like that, but now that you say it, that would be illegal wouldnt it. In that case ill remove the post. Im not about to pay $1800 for a fortnite skin.
How do i remove the post?

RaiZProduction said:
Since you want to avoid paying for that skin , this is considered as a warez request .
And warez request are forbidden on those forums.
Moreover I don't think that build.prop tweak will work with this game .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Counterpoint, per Epic themselves, to get the Galaxy skin you just need to launch your game on a note 9/tab s4. Meaning you'd get the same result by going to a friend's house and borrowing their device.
This vs the 15k vbucks, which is *exclusive* to pre-ordering the device, and bypassing that somehow would be theft.

rafaelloaa said:
Counterpoint, per Epic themselves, to get the Galaxy skin you just need to launch your game on a note 9/tab s4. Meaning you'd get the same result by going to a friend's house and borrowing their device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok , I didn't know the way to get the skin , but that's still the same .
This partnership with Epic game was made to boost sells and pre-orders for the note 9 and the tab s4.
Get this skin without pre-ordering means a loss for Samsung , since the potential buyer will borrow his friends' one and won't be forced to buy a s9/tab s4.
That's my point of view, but thanks for the infos , I don't personally play this game so you may know better than me .
elwiniscool said:
How do i remove the post?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't do that , only moderators can do that , don't worry for that

elwiniscool said:
Fortnite android beta was just released, along with a new skin for note 9 and tab s4 users. Is there any way I can edit my build.prop to let me get that new skin? If not are there any other ways it may be plausible to get the skin. I have root and twrp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since what you were asking is essentially what we consider warez, I am closing this thread.