Just my thoughts on this topic
(IM NOT TRYING TO BE OFFENSIVE)
xposed framework can be used to turn lucky patcher into a patcher on absalute crackcocain...... is xposed framework less illegal than lucky patcher? I DO NOT USE EITHER TO CRACK APPS AND I NEVER WOULD
I USE BOTH TO BLOCK ILLEGAL CORPERATE REMOTE USE OF MY CELLPHONE.... furthermore adware=logger and that is also illegal imo....
the topic: (I wont post the link because its 'closed' and i would like this topic to remain open, but this is why it was closed)
I read the thread and its not telling people to use my favorite app to hack... i paid for an app the other day that was only .99 cents but i installed the key apk first and didnt get it off gplay i was going to contact the developer about the problem but just used the fix in this topic lol.........
"Thread closed..
Discussion on lucky patcher which can be used to bypass licence verification on paid apps which is against XDA rules
Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community"
1.) You are wrong if you think hacking means cracking
2.) You are wrong if you think the app in question is not helpfull to developing. (Thats why i use it........)
3.) You are VERY VERY wrong if you think intelegence is not the main factor in bypassing licence
4.) Youu are wrong if you think bypassing licenses is always illegal locally.
5.) You are wrong if you imply licenses are always legal
6.) Google play does a plethora of illegal things of which are publicly documented. (hence why people crack them)
7.) You are blind if you think what xda does, does not CRACK various aspects of the android platform and much much more.
8.) Hacking in general (not cracking) will always and INHERENTLY lead us to choices... let people make those choices... because some people think that what google does is illegal and that they should be cracked...
.
I can keep going on and list to 100, but ill finish with this.
Thanks to you lots and lots of people will use this app to crack apps.... removing UNUSED odex files is NOT inherent to cracking apps.... so ironic.... I might be a big noob, but ive programmed since i was a little kid and the functions of this app are a godsend to DEVELOPING.
p.s. to developers.... notice how you already learned something?
leathan said:
Just my thoughts on this topic
(IM NOT TRYING TO BE OFFENSIVE)
xposed framework can be used to turn lucky patcher into a patcher on absalute crackcocain...... is xposed framework less illegal than lucky patcher? I DO NOT USE EITHER TO CRACK APPS AND I NEVER WOULD
I USE BOTH TO BLOCK ILLEGAL CORPERATE REMOTE USE OF MY CELLPHONE.... furthermore adware=logger and that is also illegal imo....
the topic: (I wont post the link because its 'closed' and i would like this topic to remain open, but this is why it was closed)
I read the thread and its not telling people to use my favorite app to hack... i paid for an app the other day that was only .99 cents but i installed the key apk first and didnt get it off gplay i was going to contact the developer about the problem but just used the fix in this topic lol.........
"Thread closed..
Discussion on lucky patcher which can be used to bypass licence verification on paid apps which is against XDA rules
Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community"
1.) You are wrong if you think hacking means cracking
2.) You are wrong if you think the app in question is not helpfull to developing. (Thats why i use it........)
3.) You are VERY VERY wrong if you think intelegence is not the main factor in bypassing licence
4.) Youu are wrong if you think bypassing licenses is always illegal locally.
5.) You are wrong if you imply licenses are always legal
6.) Google play does a plethora of illegal things of which are publicly documented. (hence why people crack them)
7.) You are blind if you think what xda does, does not CRACK various aspects of the android platform and much much more.
8.) Hacking in general (not cracking) will always and INHERENTLY lead us to choices... let people make those choices... because some people think that what google does is illegal and that they should be cracked...
.
I can keep going on and list to 100, but ill finish with this.
Thanks to you lots and lots of people will use this app to crack apps.... removing UNUSED odex files is NOT inherent to cracking apps.... so ironic.... I might be a big noob, but ive programmed since i was a little kid and the functions of this app are a godsend to DEVELOPING.
p.s. to developers.... notice how you already learned something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really......... xposed framework is 10000000 times better in regards to "illegally cracking"... I can do some things which before hand required actual coding.... please dont hate this app its got so many good features that are promoted on xda...
or is xda now on the side of MASSIVE spam overhead? it wasnt when i use to post here 5+ years back...
Related
Hi,
Core Player 1.2 --
http://www.coreplayer.com/
GK
no warez here,, this is not free software.
gvijayaratnam said:
Hi,
Core Player 1.2 -- No serial needed
http://www.coreplayer.com/
GK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Core Player 1.2
Is this a joke or what? This cost $29.99.
stupid thread.
The original link in the first post was pointing to a cracked version of Core Player. A Mod has edited the link to point to the official Core Player site.
Thread should be closed and removed. Warez is not alowed and this thread is dumb.
On the other hand, people post warez links here ALL the time by posting ROMs.
Beyond that many ROMs contain software that carriers/manufacturers need to pay for and people install these ROMs on phones that did not come with the corresponding software pre-installed.
Just because this software is not available as a seperate purchase and doesn't require activation/serial etc. doesn't mean that it's not "warez".
if u knew how to get free soda out of machine i'm sure u'd do it.
same idea with warez.
undac said:
On the other hand, people post warez links here ALL the time by posting ROMs.
Beyond that many ROMs contain software that carriers/manufacturers need to pay for and people install these ROMs on phones that did not come with the corresponding software pre-installed.
Just because this software is not available as a seperate purchase and doesn't require activation/serial etc. doesn't mean that it's not "warez".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm...people don't sell ROM's on here however.
why pay $30 when you can get it for free. the only people who are complaining are the ones who paid for it and now they feel dumb. and honestly it is overpriced anyways.
I'm gonna put my flamesuit on.
Feel dumb? Nah. I supported development of a program that takes advantage of features of my phone that HTC wouldn't give me and the CoreCodec team had to reverse engineer.
You're a criminal.
So no, I don't feel dumb, I feel like I spent my $21.99 wisely - that's what, about 15 minutes of defense lawyer time?
lildogg said:
why pay $30 when you can get it for free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it is illegal. Duh!
It's called having morals and doing the right thing. Try it sometime.
MODS - Pls close this thread.
maybe his morals are worth less than $30
AllTheWay said:
Ummm...people don't sell ROM's on here however.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, did this guy try to sell a warez copy of CorePlayer? If not, I cannot see the relevance in your reply.
The Difference...
The Admin & Moderators spend a lot of time discussing this exact issue and there is a difference between Roms (and the software that is included in them) and cracked commercial software.
First, Cooked Roms allow us to customized our Operating Systems which we have a license to use. It's similiar to adding/removing features from our desktops OS except because of the embedded nature of our devices the process is more involved. Don't want Office Mobile the only wayto remove it is cook a Rom.
Second, usually the applications included in the Rom are not commercial applications. Here is GPS Tool or Quick GPS available for purchase? Even when a commercial application is included in a Rom it isn't a version that is commercially avaliable; look at the taster version of TomTom and Cyberon Voice Dialer/Commader. I belive that the version of Sprite Back-up included in the at&t Roms is also a different version which won't upgrade using the commercial versions.
We acknowledge that we are in a gray area legally and as such we have to be very stringent about what we do and don't allow. If we become a Warez site then XDA-Developers will surely close down or loose all of the good that it currently offers simply to provide Warez.
Also as a community of DEVELOPERS we are as a community against stealing from developers.
It is a fine line we walk but in the end it is up to you our forum members to help us walk this line or abandon us as we refuse to allow WAREZ.
lildogg said:
why pay $30 when you can get it for free. the only people who are complaining are the ones who paid for it and now they feel dumb. and honestly it is overpriced anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must be the same guy that thinks it's okay to take someones car when they leave the keys in it... ...cause you got the car for free
I did actually buy quite some software. But when it comes to playing videos I still use TCPMP instead of CorePlayer. And guess what, that's freeware!
lildogg said:
why pay $30 when you can get it for free. the only people who are complaining are the ones who paid for it and now they feel dumb. and honestly it is overpriced anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir, are an IDIOT! I can get anything for free & I'm certain I know of more sources than you could ever dream of. That said, while there are certian thing that are limited trials, or have no trial version & I will usually download to test those. Just like SK Tools, which is a great app, so I PURCHASED IT.
Guess what, if everybody was a scumbag thief like you, developers would stop making the programs you use. So it's because of us so called "stupid" people, that you can even cheat the system. Think about it idiot! If everyone was stealing your $hit, you'd stop making it, right?
So think before you open your pie hole Jacka$$, I know that's hard for many people.
very well said!
Sup pepol
i've been searching for a while for Facelock for apps pro, i found like 12 apk, but they all have the same error;
after i train the app to recognize my face, it quits , and when i try to get back, it quits immidiatly
can any one provide me with a stable version ???
thx
foued1994 said:
Sup pepol
i've been searching for a while for Facelock for apps pro, i found like 12 apk, but they all have the same error;
after i train the app to recognize my face, it quits , and when i try to get back, it quits immidiatly
can any one provide me with a stable version ???
thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're asking for a pirate copy? is this allowed in these forums? How about BUYING it? that would for sure "provide you with a stable copy"
I believe this section is called " dev and HACKING" unless you have the solution im looking for, which by the way is so far from buying it, pkease leave
i happen to know the dev. i've reviewed this app for him before. in fact im going to be doing another one soon because he sent me the latest version.
the reason it keeps crashing on you is because he has implemented the market license thingy that detects you haven't paid for it the second your device touches the internet.
I hate paying for apps too, but the ones that deserve my money, i pay for, and i have a large list of awesome apps that i have paid for because it was actually worth it.
dude, this app is worth it. it works with ics and gingerbread, it has way more customizations than any other face unlock app out there AND it is the most stable!
And i only review good, useful apps. and when they are paid apps, they better be worth it!
but as far as getting a hacked version, i wouldn't hold your breath, sorry dude.
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, either pay or find your cracks and serials somewhere else. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First and final warning
Keep seeing posts about what apps do you use (I've posted a few myself). Thought I'd do a poll so that other new comers can quickly assess what the most popular options are instead of purchasing many different apps.
DEleted
hertsjoatmon said:
found a copy of adobe ideas ideas <warez url> seems to work fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like your promoting piracy here... Since I do some Android development and have always respected the work of developers, I gotta report you and hope you get banned.
Maybe you should learn to write apps, pour your time and energy into it in hopes of making some money only to have people pirate it.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 2
hertsjoatmon said:
found a copy of adobe ideas ideas <snip>.com
seems to work fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xda forum rules:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community.
I completely understand and support the policy here.
However, I believe this was an innocent mistake. I certainly hope the OP doesn't get banned for it... All that's needed is a friendly reminder of the rules and clear warning not to do it again.
No need to crucify the guy for being unaware.
can't be innocent. that's from known warez site.
madsquabbles said:
can't be innocent. that's from known warez site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[could not stop myself:] How would _you_ know?
Apologies. I wasn't thinking. It's an app I really wanted to try as the reviews sounded good. As it's no longer available for Purchase, I didn't think it would be a problem as I see threads on here with links for apps ported from other devices such as super note
p107r0 said:
xda forum rules:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apologies. If it was available to purchase I would purchase it. That was the only place I could find it. If some one can link a source where I can pay for it, I will do gladly.
hertsjoatmon said:
Apologies. If it was available to purchase I would purchase it. That was the only place I could find it. If some one can link a source where I can pay for it, I will do gladly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to bash you anymore, so apart from any ethical considerations...
Reality is - until you advertise it - nobody here knows and cares how you obtained your apps.
The practical dimension is more important and really simple - if we want xda to exist, let's not provide grounds for piracy promotion accusations.
The rest is between you and your conscience (and copyright enforcement agencies I might add).
p107r0 said:
Not to bash you anymore, so apart from any ethical considerations...
Reality is - until you advertise it - nobody here knows and cares how you obtained your apps.
The practical dimension is more important and really simple - if we want xda to exist, let's not provide grounds for piracy promotion accusations.
The rest is between you and your conscience (and copyright enforcement agencies I might add).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So should I request others be band for posting links to apps that aren't available to note 8.0 users as it isn't available via legitimate sources? The first guy to suggest I get band got vcl via an alternate source as well as supernote. Yes the site I suggested is unethical but how is that different to people posting a link to Dropbox?
I appreciate that what I did was wrong, but I take offence to be accused of not supporting developers. I've deleted the post and I'm willing to pay for the app if someone can suggest a way for me to do so.
ExploreMN said:
Sounds like your promoting piracy here... Since I do some Android development and have always respected the work of developers, I gotta report you and hope you get banned.
Maybe you should learn to write apps, pour your time and energy into it in hopes of making some money only to have people pirate it.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. While I appreciate I made a mistake with my suggestion, by downloading supernote on here, aren't you undermining Asus who have the rights to it? I'm just trying to understand where the moral lines are? Getting an app that is no longer distributed anywhere is wrong, but getting an app that is exclusive to a particular vendor?
Sorry for all my posts in this thread. I enjoy contributing to these forums. I've learnt a lot on here and like to help others where I can. I just don't want to get banned for suggesting sourcing an app that is no longer available
hertsjoatmon said:
So should I request others be band for posting links to apps that aren't available to note 8.0 users as it isn't available via legitimate sources? The first guy to suggest I get band got vcl via an alternate source as well as supernote. Yes the site I suggested is unethical but how is that different to people posting a link to Dropbox?
I appreciate that what I did was wrong, but I take offence to be accused of not supporting developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's not get into defensive mode, small missteps happen to everybody now and then. Nevertheless "everybody does that..." does not provide valid reason for anything.
It's not about yours, mine on anybody else's excuse on getting stuff in shady ways, it's about not advertising the fact on xda. Nothing more than that.
I'm sorry you had to learn that in rather unpleasant way.
hertsjoatmon said:
I've deleted the post and I'm willing to pay for the app if someone can suggest a way for me to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for removing that post. Really.
hertsjoatmon said:
So should I request others be band for posting links to apps that aren't available to note 8.0 users as it isn't available via legitimate sources? The first guy to suggest I get band got vcl via an alternate source as well as supernote. Yes the site I suggested is unethical but how is that different to people posting a link to Dropbox?
I appreciate that what I did was wrong, but I take offence to be accused of not supporting developers. I've deleted the post and I'm willing to pay for the app if someone can suggest a way for me to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for this post up front because I know it causes more drama but....
Even though I agree with the warez link not being posted here on XDA you make a strong point. The question is where does the line get drawn? Take the hotpot mods for example. They are allowing one to get something for free that usually is only obtainable through an additional monthly fee.
My opinion is these things should be decided by Moderators and not members because both sides have an argument when it comes to this. Best practice is to report the post and let them make the decision on what is best for XDA. When members confront other members a lot of times it has a tendency to get a bit ugly.
It's a shame this thread got side tracked so soon, I was hoping to promote discussion on the pros and cons of particular favoured apps . Wishlists of features and promotion of the lesser known apps for people wishing to experiment
hertsjoatmon said:
It's a shame this thread got side tracked so soon, I was hoping to promote discussion on the pros and cons of particular favoured apps . Wishlists of features and promotion of the lesser known apps for people wishing to experiment
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be a great thread. Why not start a new one? Perhaps this one can get renamed.
Sent from my GT-N5100 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Sometime during the week, I'm going to start an open google document to do a table of the apps listed on here and the features that each one has.
max resolution. max layers. export jpeg. export png. vector. brush types. layer options. duplicate, merge, colour, overlay, multiply, mask. blend took. dodge / burn tool. flip. grid overlay etc etc.
I will post a link once I have it up and hope that you can help in filling it in. These apps are all getting updates and i'm losing track of what has what functionality. Ideally, id like to minimise the amount i need to go in and out of various apps and this table should help me decide which ones best complement each other.
with out a blend / smudge tool. sketchbook pro is off of my short list. I can import my psd file from layerpaint into it, which is great but with out the smudge tool it makes colouring far to difficult.
both artflow and infinite painter have this option but I can figure out a way to open a psd file from a different application in them which is really frustrating.
looks like clover paint can both import and export in psd, it has unlimited canvas size and layers and also includes a blend tool... It's just made it to top of my list of apps to try.
I emailed the artflow dev and was told there is no plans in the near future to support psd import
Some of live in some places ,where google do exist..but services are myth's.In my place a dollar is equal to 80 bugs, nexus 4 costs 35k (16 gb) ,HTC one 50k, Note 3 65-70k,Z1 57k.So,when some one purchase a phone above 30k ..He or she can at-least spend some few more on purchasing apps. But, google wont let us do that..they even dont let redeem some gift cards.Actually I was pirating some great apps (not ridiculously over priced) and came across this guilt I do spend the time that I had to spare on XDA. There some great stuffs developed by XDA members smart wifi toggles, Better battery meter.I am not a developer and never will be,but do hangout here ..which is kinda fraternity. Like, mike1986 page he says "If you like my work,you can buy me a beer" ..its kindaa sad that we cant contribute... So,all those developer's we are sorry for pirating your work,but please blame it on the policies
The reason that any posts relating to software piracy get locked down, and the reason that asking for links etc is banned is because XDA is based in the USA and would open itself to legal action if they allowed it to take place.
SimonTS said:
The reason that any posts relating to software piracy get locked down, and the reason that asking for links etc is banned is because XDA is based in the USA and would open itself to legal action if they allowed it to take place.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not asking for any links.I was just expressing my guilt and saying sorry to the developer's
sohojmanush said:
*snip*
... So,all those developer's we are sorry for pirating your work,but please blame it on the policies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Please note the following:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community
I honestly do not care what your excuse or rationalization is. Do not discuss it here on XDA.
Hi guys
Sorry for such a noobish topic in a forum where people seriously contemplate how to repair a bricked device
I play Minecraft PE and, some people know that there is a special perk called a "cape " in the game.
It was available in the game by using a redeem code in 2016 but I was unable to get it (I didn't know)
The redeem code has been expired, so even if I go back to old versions with tibu, I can't get it.
There are many modded versions of MCPE around which have capes unlocked. Could someone please teach me how to make one myself?
Thanks in advance
kushfighter2 said:
Hi guys
Sorry for such a noobish topic in a forum where people seriously contemplate how to repair a bricked device
I play Minecraft PE and, some people know that there is a special perk called a "cape " in the game.
It was available in the game by using a redeem code in 2016 but I was unable to get it (I didn't know)
The redeem code has been expired, so even if I go back to old versions with tibu, I can't get it.
There are many modded versions of MCPE around which have capes unlocked. Could someone please teach me how to make one myself?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
6. Do not post or request warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit members to request, post, promote or describe ways in which warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained or used. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community.
Thread closed.