So we need explicit written permission to modify any kind of open source now? When did the open source community get like this? My ROM thread was shut down due to the fact that I did not receive prior permission to use the ROM it was based off of. This would mean that each dev would need explicit permission from google to mod their initial code. Please remember that while our devs work hard, none of them produced the initial source. This means that we all have equal rights to the whole thing. When did the community get this way? I'm disappointed. Maybe it is time to move away from XDA...
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
mazwoz said:
So we need explicit written permission to modify any kind of open source now? When did the open source community get like this? My ROM thread was shut down due to the fact that I did not receive prior permission to use the ROM it was based off of. This would mean that each dev would need explicit permission from google to mod their initial code. Please remember that while our devs work hard, none of them produced the initial source. This means that we all have equal rights to the whole thing. When did the community get this way? I'm disappointed. Maybe it is time to move away from XDA...
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read the rules much:
12. Using the work of others.
If you are developing something that is based on the work of another Member, youMUST first seek their permission, and you must give credit to the member whose work you used. If adispute occurs about who developed / created a piece of work, first try to settle the matter by private message and NOT in open forum. If this fails then you may contact amoderator with clear evidence that the work was created by you.
Convincing evidence will result in copied work being removed. If there is no clear evidence you created the work then in the spirit of sharing all work will remain posted on the forums.
These rules apply to all software posted on XDA unless that software comes with alicense that waives these rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, that was my fault. But I'm going to need everyone to credit Google on every ROM posted. No one on here developed the initial source code. One person gets a ROM working on a phone, it gets modded, but only Google is the true dev.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
mazwoz said:
Ok, that was my fault. But I'm going to need everyone to credit Google on every ROM posted. No one on here developed the initial source code. One person gets a ROM working on a phone, it gets modded, but only Google is the true dev.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is not a member of this forum
Sent from my ice cream powered Nexus S
Doesn't matter if they are even aware of the forum. Give credit where credit is due. If people want to ruin open source and act like Apple, they should follow their own requests.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
mazwoz said:
Doesn't matter if they are even aware of the forum. Give credit where credit is due. If people want to ruin open source and act like Apple, they should follow their own requests.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm referencing your OP, no one has to give credit to Google as per forum rules, nor do they probably care
Sent from my ice cream powered Nexus S
What I'm talking about is people acting like they own Android. It is not up to them.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
mazwoz said:
What I'm talking about is people acting like they own Android. It is not up to them.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is about respect to your fellow developers and community members, not ownership, or who was first, or any stupid stuff that goes along with it. Just respect. You know you didn't create something, so show some respect to the people who did, remember... without them you would have nothing to add to and call your own.
That is not what I'm being told. I'm told that it is about ownership by a mod.
daveid said:
It is about respect to your fellow developers and community members, not ownership, or who was first, or any stupid stuff that goes along with it. Just respect. You know you didn't create something, so show some respect to the people who did, remember... without them you would have nothing to add to and call your own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
its not about owning android. They just modded and added their bits. Then, what they want is credit for the bits. Not that hard to five credits is it?
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Related
Ok its been a day and then some so were are the full odin and full samsung install files so that we may test ec05 to see wha= is the best way to develope a rom based off of ec05. I say use jourling for ext4 and keep sprint id and carrier iq as realy folks what's the big deal over carrier iq?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Are u serious?
Sent From My Evo Killer!
Yes I am
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
inb4 "moved to Q&A"
Your the same one *****ing in the other thread about our moderator and people not posting in the right section and you post this on the development section? Make your own rom with carrier IQ and sprint id if you want it so bad.
Sent From My Evo Killer!
Well I'm sure he might if the devs here on xda didn't feel it necessary to keep the update from everyone by only releasing their roms based off it, for an open source community the devs here sure like to act like selfish little internet fame seekers, true open source developers would have shared the update the moment they got their hands on it in unmodified form so everyone could take a stab at it, just goes to show you what xda is really based around
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Zeinzu said:
true open source developers would have shared the update the moment they got their hands on it in unmodified form so everyone could take a stab at it,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's, uh, exactly what the Bonsai team did. The links have been removed by mods, but they released a stock deodexed EC05.
Curious as to why that was? What rules was it violating? They didn't say what rules just that it was closed until it complied...
Sent from my Most Epic device using XDA Premium
They required donations I believe, sounds real opensource to me, the devs here are a real credit to the opensource community (sarcasm)
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
buddickman said:
Ok its been a day and then some so were are the full odin and full samsung install files so that we may test ec05 to see wha= is the best way to develope a rom based off of ec05. I say use jourling for ext4 and keep sprint id and carrier iq as realy folks what's the big deal over carrier iq?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^this is your brain on drugs^
Zeinzu said:
They required donations I believe, sounds real opensource to me, the devs here are a real credit to the opensource community (sarcasm)
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice job posting what you don't know about... the thread was closed because it linked to their personll site you have to register for. It is completely free. Donations are asked for, not required, but they are asked for by every dev.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Then exactly what rule did they break and where/what is the link to their site, seems like xda is going out of its way to make things difficult
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Zeinzu said:
Then exactly what rule did they break and where/what is the link to their site, seems like xda is going out of its way to make things difficult
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search and Google are your friend, this dead horse has been kicked way to many times.
Zeinzu said:
They required donations I believe, sounds real opensource to me, the devs here are a real credit to the opensource community (sarcasm)
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You my friend are an absoulute idiot. Please search before you run your mouth and.make yourself look stupid like you did.
Sent From My Evo Killer!
Thread closed. We do not tolerate these threads, especially not posted by banned users on a new account
Hello I am here to give the email address of HTCs main developer for the thunderbolt. He is in charge of source code for kernel. Be polite when requesting it.
[email protected]
Credit to TeamAndIRC for releasing email address. I'm a messenger
Martin,
I am writing you in regards to the yet unreleased kernel source for the HTC Thunderbolt. I have emailed HTC's primary support address multiple times, and have received no satisfactory responses, other than the standard response of 90-120 days.
I understand that Android is mostly released under the Apache license, but we all know that the linux kernel still falls under the GPL license. The GPL license has no conditions in it allowing for a grace period to release the source code. This means that HTC has been in violation of the GPL license for the past week, as the kernel source code still remains unreleased.
There is a large enthusiast community behind the Thunderbolt, and it would be in HTC's best interest to comply with open source agreements.
If you could please facilitate the release of the kernel source code, it would be appreciated, and further complications from the open source community can easily be avoided.
Thank you,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent
.......
Great email. Let's keep it civil.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Please post the responses you get from htc.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Please do this. We need this as a community
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Comes off a little threatening to me but hope it helps get the source release
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
Everyone should send an email. We need to get a kernel developer to email.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Honestly, I truly wish I had the resources to truly threaten them with legal action. Companies should be taught that just because they're large companies, doesn't mean they have the right to abuse this kind of stuff like they do.
I know TeamAndIRC is trying to get someone who is a lawyer involved
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Just hold a gun to their head or send this email....not sure which is worse
Give them time and be patient...then always release the source code...usually a month or two after release...its how they work.
magneticzero said:
Give them time and be patient...then always release the source code...usually a month or two after release...its how they work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
right, and lets let criminals steal because eventually they will stop.
Just because eventually they do the right thing, doesn't mean they shouldn't be punished.
what i dont get is how they are going to release the kernel source for the Incredible S, which has yet to be released, and not for current phones.
http://www.androidcentral.com/htc-releases-kernel-source-incredible-s-mytouch-3g-slide-wildfire
They won't release ours bc we got root already. There going to try and push and update to lock us in again
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
papi92 said:
They won't release ours bc we got root already. There going to try and push and update to lock us in again
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Verizon's probably got a hand in trying to delay the source code as well.
Its new...get over it really. They will release it when they are ready.
Kernel source is suppose to be released the day of the device being released. Or before the release date. It's a legal term of using linux or any gpl code.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
But have they always followed this? And do they get in trouble? Nope. Wait it out...you guys make me laugh irl.
magneticzero said:
But have they always followed this? And do they get in trouble? Nope. Wait it out...you guys make me laugh irl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it's wrong, but they do it all the time, so we should just ignore it? Really dude? I love your attitude.
This is why companies get away with so much BS, illegal stuff, unorthodox stuff... because so many people in the general public have your attitude.
GrdLock said:
So it's wrong, but they do it all the time, so we should just ignore it? Really dude? I love your attitude.
This is why companies get away with so much BS, illegal stuff, unorthodox stuff... because so many people in the general public have your attitude.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah...i just like seeing people whine....you will get it when its ready.
The reason I pose this question is because it is a precursor to a debate point which I later want to get to but in order to do that, there needs to be an objective definition.
What I would is for people to share their understanding of what KANGING is.
To me, KANGING is taking another developers code and creating something else with it.
This can be as simple as compiling android with an extended menu.
You pretty much got it. To copy and make your own or just to copy.
I don't like the term. The whole point of open source software is to allow others to freely take and modify your own code, which was also built off of other people's code. As long as credit is given where due, what the heck is the problem? Sure, I understand taking someone's work, barely modifying it, and calling it your own can be looked down upon, but as long as credit is given to the original author(s), it is allowed.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Where did the term originate? Did someone way back in the day rip off code and his name happened to be Kang?
eagercrow said:
Where did the term originate? Did someone way back in the day rip off code and his name happened to be Kang?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You got it...kind of. Kang was not the actual last name though.
armoguy94 said:
Sure, I understand taking someone's work, barely modifying it, and calling it your own can be looked down upon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure this is more of where the term came from and why it upsets people, but add "without permission and/or credit."
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Yeah, if someone specifically licenses their code to require permission... It is not as if the original coder asked permission from Google, Samsung, or whoever else to use their code. They made it freely available so anyone can freely modify and release it for free, as well. I think people here need to accept that fact. This is what is so great about open source software. However, if someone is releasing your modified work as their own without giving credit, that is a problem.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
armoguy94 said:
Yeah, if someone specifically licenses their code to require permission... It is not as if the original coder asked permission from Google, Samsung, or whoever else to use their code. They made it freely available so anyone can freely modify and release it for free, as well. I think people here need to accept that fact. This is what is so great about open source software. However, if someone is releasing your modified work as their own without giving credit, that is a problem.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to put something else out there based on this, what if the credit is in the source code. Just doesn't appear on the release page because of some random reason.
Does the definition change? Is it still KANG? Is it stolen? What's the thoughts?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
kr3w1337 said:
Just to put something else out there based on this, what if the credit is in the source code. Just doesn't appear on the release page because of some random reason.
Does the definition change? Is it still KANG? Is it stolen? What's the thoughts?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure, but that's unlikely to happen.. if anyone is ever in that position, they should just not be sleezey and give credit where due.
armoguy94 said:
I'm not sure, but that's unlikely to happen.. if anyone is ever in that position, they should just not be sleezey and give credit where due.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is where I would disagree, giving credit on a forum post isn't necessarily better than having the credits in the source code. Thinking as a developer, it would be much more important to me to have my name on top of a code snippet.
I would also like to point to XDA Rule #12 for this thinking.
If it violates the rules posted in this new thread by kenthepenn, it's Kanging:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1508510
skrambled said:
If it violates the rules posted in this new thread by kenthepenn, it's Kanging:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1508510
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be specific, your own words. All of us already have access to that post and we can see it on our own, no point in regurgitating. Think about it like law, everyone has access to the written version, it is interpretation that's important.
kr3w1337 said:
Be specific, your own words. All of us already have access to that post and we can see it on our own, no point in regurgitating. Think about it like law, everyone has access to the written version, it is interpretation that's important.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specifically this has already been answered. In responses here and in that thread I linked to. Maybe you should just tell us what your angle is here, clearly you have one...
EDIT: Just realized that sounded kind of dickish. Sorry, rough day.
I think it is the same thing as plagiarism. It's just wrong. You should ask permission and attribute. Don't take others work and pass it off as your own. Basic ethics.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
skrambled said:
Specifically this has already been answered. In responses here and in that thread I linked to. Maybe you should just tell us what your angle is here, clearly you have one...
EDIT: Just realized that sounded kind of dickish. Sorry, rough day.
I think it is the same thing as plagiarism. It's just wrong. You should ask permission and attribute. Don't take others work and pass it off as your own. Basic ethics.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did share my view OP bro. The reason I'm asking is also in the OP.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
kr3w1337 said:
I did share my view OP bro. The reason I'm asking is also in the OP.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw that. But you also said it was a precursor to a debate point you would get to. What's up for debate? The part about asking permission first?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
skrambled said:
I saw that. But you also said it was a precursor to a debate point you would get to. What's up for debate? The part about asking permission first?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now you're just getting impatient and ahead of yourself. Just wait.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk
I'm here not to bash XDA but just to remind every nOOb and DEV what XDA is all about, this weekend was probably the worst time to be a member of this community and it has brought me shame and embarrassment to be a member. I just wanted to remind EVERYONE whether your new, old, or a Developer that we are all ONE we are not here to bash peoples work or criticize one another but to RESPECT our work that we put in the community whether its a ROM, a PORT, KERNEL, KANG or ADVICE/TIPS....
As you have all seen every forum has 4 threads to it: General, Q & A, Development and Themes & Apps. Let's try to stick our INFORMATION in the proper thread.
1st. If anybody PORTS, or is listing someone else's work PLEASE ask permission FIRST before doing ANYTHING they have put their hard FREE TIME into their own project not to get the recognition they deserve.
2nd. Just because u fixed a certain issue with a ROM doesn't give you the right to start your own thread, its best if you post how the issue was fixed or PM the DEV so they can implement it on their next update.
3rd. nOObs! Please SEARCH before doing anything or posting! This community has been here for years I'm pretty sure whatever your problem or question is it has been answered before in numerous threads done start a new thread PERIOD!! UNLESS its something that u trully 100% couldnt find an answer.
4th. Please explain why someone would start a thread about a problem they are having in Q. & A. Or General about a certain Rom when they can easily go READ the ROMS thread or ask your question there??? Like I said previously there are a million users I'm pretty sure your question has been answered!!
And finally let's RESPECT each other and LEARN TO READ!!! USE THE SEARCH BUTTON!!! POST IN THE CORRECT THREAD!!!! ASK PERMISSION AND GIVE PROPS/THANKS if your using someone else's HARD WORK.
BTW: Finally like it says in the title ITS A REMINDER!! People seem to forget NOT LEARN HOW TO READ!!
Open source means ANYONE can use it to build Android! Using other peoples ROM without permission is not considered OPEN SOURCE.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
+1, Well said
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
However, I 100% agree with you that modifying someone else's ROM and not giving credit or asking permission is completely wrong and messed up, but that doesn't mean it's still not OPEN SOURCE. Permission or not, it's all OPEN SOURCE, but yes, people should be giving credit and asking permission first.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
troby86 said:
However, I 100% agree with you that modifying someone else's ROM and not giving credit or asking permission is completely wrong and messed up, but that doesn't mean it's still not OPEN SOURCE. Permission or not, it's all OPEN SOURCE, but yes, people should be giving credit and asking permission first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's often not true at all. Sense ROMs contain HTC software that is proprietary and closed-source...
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
TeeJay3800 said:
That's often not true at all. Sense ROMs contain HTC software that is proprietary and closed-source...
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
This is just going to start debate after debate as it has already. So im going to close the thread.
ROM removed due to kanging and failure to comply with a moderator request.
Looks interesting, glad to see some activity (as many have said befor) again
Some screenshots would be nice. I'm downloading it right now, I'll flash when I have some seconds to spare.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Haha, screenshots are only needed if you haven't used GOV2, but ill include them soon for everyone.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Wow....SMH....Nice to see you kanged my tweaks I let you use in generic ginger and the build.prop tweaks as well. Sigh....I see you also failed to give Ayoteddy and sduvick credit for the base either. You my friend are a pure KANGER plan and simple. I only gave permission for you to use my scripts and tweaks in generic ginger. This is what happens to me when I try to be nice. Not anymore.
You have been reported to mods and im sure a ban hammer will follow.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I gave credits to ya, so you my friend, I could care less. Ill just keep changing my IP and reposting it. Good luck.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Also, your tweaks aren't copyrighted. Its open source, this is for everyone to use. If you can't create a good ROM, me and my team will do it for everyone else.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
JiN1337 said:
Also, your tweaks aren't copyrighted. Its open source, this is for everyone to use. If you can't create a good ROM, me and my team will do it for everyone else.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the patents are pending....Either way you could at least had the respect to ask me first. I helped you out of the kindness of my heart. I do not take donations for what i do. All I ask is for proper credit. Nothing more.....And you got your idea of "open source" all twisted. Google willingly open sources there Code. Google is under zero obligation to post source code. How ever....The kernel which is linux based falls under GPL License which is a requirement under GPL to be open sourced. No where in the GPL Agreement does "Scripts" or "Tweaks" fall under GPL. So next time do your research before you start speaking non sense.
Now let me be VERY VERY clear in my next statement...DO NOT POST ANYTHING OF MINE IN YOUR ROM WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. Per Xda rules you need to obtain permission from the author of the Rom/Script/kernel before posting and give proper credit. Now I will be watching you like a hawk. I will let this slide this once. DONT LET IT HAPPEN AGAIN.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Well, I never gave up development for GenericGinger so I did nothing wrong. Reviewers removed me from the OP, and said I wasn't maintaining the ROM. So I made my own. Sorry if you feel that way, but I gave you, and everyone else tweaks, and wor credit. Notice the kernel was credited to PDT which is sduvick and ayoteddy, and your tweaks notes are still the same I added my name in as well cause I made adjustments. I understand your concern, but I'm not going to ask permission from someone who doesn't care about the future of the Sidekick 4G because they don't even have one.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
JiN1337 said:
Well, I never gave up development for GenericGinger so I did nothing wrong. Reviewers removed me from the OP, and said I wasn't maintaining the ROM. So I made my own. Sorry if you feel that way, but I gave you, and everyone else tweaks, and wor credit. Notice the kernel was credited to PDT which is sduvick and ayoteddy, and your tweaks notes are still the same I added my name in as well cause I made adjustments. I understand your concern, but I'm not going to ask permission from someone who doesn't care about the future of the Sidekick 4G because they don't even have one.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Per xda rules you have to ask for permission. Whether you like it or not you will ask before you use my work or you will be reported for kanging. End of story. This isnt open for discussion.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Why can't we keep the noise to signal ratio in check around here in the development section?
You call yourselves developers? This is a chat room for teenaged modders.
If you two have a problem, take it outside.
orange is right you need to stop, reactive i dont use your mods in my rom anymore because they dont work as well as others i have used, and some were already implemented so chill out is this a popularity contest or are you actually trying to make this phone better.
HewettBR said:
orange is right you need to stop, reactive i dont use your mods in my rom anymore because they dont work as well as others i have used, and some were already implemented so chill out is this a popularity contest or are you actually trying to make this phone better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont have this device so it doesnt matter to be. I was trying to be helpful but that will not happen again. Threads been reported. My work here is done. Freaking kangers.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
As you can see, he started. I've got no problem making this release passworded and hosting it elsewhere if that's what I've gotta do, and have people PM me for the password. And go ahead, report me, why do you think I care? I'm not going to ask permission for open source software, be happy I gave you credits and didn't be immature about it. The fact Hewett and I are the only ones with Sidekicks still doing work should prove something to you. Now, go ahead. Hit the report button, get me banned. Ill see you in 5 minutes with a new thread and account name ready to be copy and pasted.
Edit : Hewett has nothing to do with this, he's simply an aiding developer to a dying phone. Want to ban someone? Ban me, IPV4 has a lot of IP addresses, you can't ban them all.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
JiN1337 said:
As you can see, he started. I've got no problem making this release passworded and hosting it elsewhere if that's what I've gotta do, and have people PM me for the password. And go ahead, report me, why do you think I care? I'm not going to ask permission for open source software, be happy I gave you credits and didn't be immature about it. The fact Hewett and I are the only ones with Sidekicks still doing work should prove something to you. Now, go ahead. Hit the report button, get me banned. Ill see you in 5 minutes with a new thread and account name ready to be copy and pasted.
Edit : Hewett has nothing to do with this, he's simply an aiding developer to a dying phone. Want to ban someone? Ban me, IPV4 has a lot of IP addresses, you can't ban them all.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you will keep getting banned over and over
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
That's cool. I don't think I really care. What are you, 2 years old? I'm still gonna release it over and over again. And ill make a torrent. =) everyone should be able to enjoy our hard work.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
JiN1337 said:
That's cool. I don't think I really care. What are you, 2 years old? I'm still gonna release it over and over again. And ill make a torrent. =) everyone should be able to enjoy our hard work.
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao...."OUR" hard work??? I think you meant to say ayoteddy, sduvick, and reactivedisorders hard work. Ayoteddy and sduvick made the base rom and theme and I supplied the scripts and tweaks...All you did was kang it and change the title. Lmfao.
Ya our "hard work".....you are the reason this device is dead. Im glad the scripts i gave you were nothing more then a bunch of random mumbo jumbo. I had a feeling from the gecko you were shadey. Oh well...reviewers has the real scripts You sir just got punk'd.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Ok, this is working for me phone and all!
It is not quite the same theme as GOv2 because the power-widget is not transparent-black (and it is missing the news&weather widget).
Other then that, seems same as GOv2 but a bit faster.
Can we get back on topic. ReActiveDisorder should be banned from this thread and JiN1337 should be banned from his if he's even posting there. No body owns a script or text-file "tweaks". You didn't write the code that does something, you just learned of its existence and enabled it. Fighting over INI files... really?
ReActiveDisorder said:
Lmao...."OUR" hard work??? I think you meant to say ayoteddy, sduvick, and reactivedisorders hard work. Ayoteddy and sduvick made the base rom and theme and I supplied the scripts and tweaks...All you did was kang it and change the title. Lmfao.
Ya our "hard work".....you are the reason this device is dead. Im glad the scripts i gave you were nothing more then a bunch of random mumbo jumbo. I had a feeling from the gecko you were shadey. Oh well...reviewers has the real scripts You sir just got punk'd.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, your mumbo jumbo is working wonders for the ROM, thank-you!
JiN1337 said:
Well, your mumbo jumbo is working wonders for the ROM, thank-you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Its just a placebo affect
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
ReActiveDisorder said:
Lol. Its just a placebo affect
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're a horrible liar, lol.
Code:
http://pastebin.com/UpENaMBv
Half of the tweaks you used are in here, and they have been proven to work. Mhm.