Is it worth updating to the Ics right now..??
I mean is it stable now ??
And does it really have better adreno drivers- can it give better performance than GB ??
And how much quadrant score u guys are able to get from sensee with
1.)ICS
2.)GB
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA App
Quadrant is a very very very useless bench,, its to old and to crappy to run on dualcore phone's
to answer your question
yes it is stable, doesnt run very smooth,
some lag here and there but every thing else is working or there is a fix for,
CF-bench altough shows that it isnt the best and the fastest rom out there yet, but it is a stable beta release
flash it and you will see what i mean
I will say this much. On trips current beta ics rom, I get much more fps than I do on any gingerbread rom for sure. They all give me some kind of lag but the ICS rom is smooth as butter
Sent from my Sensation using XDA App
I ran Virtuous for a while and it was pretty smooth. Now I am on TripNravers senseless ICS build and it is really smooth with next to no lag. O and Quadrant sucks. It is not very consistent and has not been updated in almost a year which means there is most likely no support for dual cores.
GB I got 25-28 fps with Nenamark2
Virtuous ICS I got 40-44 fps with Nenamark2
Trips senseless ICS I get 45-48 fps.
Trips ROM is not on xda but if you Google for TripNiCE HTC Pyramid you will find it.
fandroid93 said:
I ran Virtuous for a while and it was pretty smooth. Now I am on TripNravers senseless ICS build and it is really smooth with next to no lag. O and Quadrant sucks. It is not very consistent and has not been updated in almost a year which means there is most likely no support for dual cores.
GB I got 25-28 fps with Nenamark2
Virtuous ICS I got 40-44 fps with Nenamark2
Trips senseless ICS I get 45-48 fps.
Trips ROM is not on xda but if you Google for TripNiCE HTC Pyramid you will find it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does it compare to his AOSP build? I put both ROMs on my SD Card but I flashed AOSP first, so far I love it but it isn't daily driver status for me. If the senseless one is almost as fast I'll give it a shot.
fandroid93 said:
I ran Virtuous for a while and it was pretty smooth. Now I am on TripNravers senseless ICS build and it is really smooth with next to no lag. O and Quadrant sucks. It is not very consistent and has not been updated in almost a year which means there is most likely no support for dual cores.
GB I got 25-28 fps with Nenamark2
Virtuous ICS I got 40-44 fps with Nenamark2
Trips senseless ICS I get 45-48 fps.
Trips ROM is not on xda but if you Google for TripNiCE HTC Pyramid you will find it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried trip's , but got FC's here and there....
Back to GB now
I think i should wait for a cyanogen 9 edition...
Also, i noticed that frame rate of video recording was quite better than GB...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA App
Trips ASOP is lightning. His senseless ROM isn't as fast but its faster than every other ICS Senseless ROM I have tried.
Quadrant scores don't mean much because if you undervolt the kernel you will get lower scores and vice versa. Further more quadrant scores are only useful for stock and unrooted phones
blahbl4hblah said:
Quadrant scores don't mean much because if you undervolt the kernel you will get lower scores and vice versa. Further more quadrant scores are only useful for stock and unrooted phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is a new information for me, so what benchmark tool you use to get a comparison between sensation (or any dual core device) roms speed/performance?
fandroid93 said:
I ran Virtuous for a while and it was pretty smooth. Now I am on TripNravers senseless ICS build and it is really smooth with next to no lag. O and Quadrant sucks. It is not very consistent and has not been updated in almost a year which means there is most likely no support for dual cores.
GB I got 25-28 fps with Nenamark2
Virtuous ICS I got 40-44 fps with Nenamark2
Trips senseless ICS I get 45-48 fps.
Trips ROM is not on xda but if you Google for TripNiCE HTC Pyramid you will find it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm... nenamark2 i get 42fps with gb... havent tried any ics builds yet
Lizzo said:
hmm... nenamark2 i get 42fps with gb... havent tried any ics builds yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With a Sense 3.5 GB ROM? I read those include the updated Adreno drivers which is probably the reason behind the improved results.
mametosaurus said:
this is a new information for me, so what benchmark tool you use to get a comparison between sensation (or any dual core device) roms speed/performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF-Bench and Antutu, as they both support dual-core architectures.
mametosaurus said:
this is a new information for me, so what benchmark tool you use to get a comparison between sensation (or any dual core device) roms speed/performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The usual things quadrant and cfbench
Its just for fun and I only use it on stock speeds other then that its pretty much for show
Related
Thought I would start a thread, where people can see how their MT4G stacks up against others. People can post their benchmarks and say what ROM they are running, where they have their processor clocked, etc....
Anyways, I attached my screens, I am running cm7... the benchmark test I just ran, was clocked at like 1.4GHz on cm7.
The quadrant is back when I was running an alpha, clocked at 1.2GHz
Best Quadrant Score seen so far: Unknown(Looks like CM7)
Best LinPack: Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Best SmartBench: Cm7, OC at 1.3ghz
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
jriv said:
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I see...haha nice. Too bad it was freezing up
Ya I knew it wasn't gonna be stable just wanted to see if I could crack the top 10
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is nice for factory..if it truly is non hacked...very nice.
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive with factory MT4G. I get 1700-1800.
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
bobsbbq said:
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, but I thought benchmark 2011 or whatever the name is, was accepted as a more accurate marker..?
EDIT: SmartBench 2010 is what app I am talking about.
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
My phone is a taiwan version, with a good screen.
do you run quadrant back to back to get 1700-1800?
you should always toss the 1st one, as the processor isn't running at full speed ( at least i don't think so) because all tests after the initial one are always higher.
but the 2060 was my 2nd test after installing the app.
and too, that was like the only app i had installed at the time.
Hahah
brianphanz0r said:
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MT4G running Gingerbread
No freezing here. O/C @1.7
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
I'm running CM 6.1.2 RC2 w/ Grankin's kernel.
Best Quadrant score I've got so far when overclocked to 1.8Ghz is 3114.
It runs stable but sucks the life out of the battery.
For every day use, I have it on 1.2Ghz.
I can't link to the outside since this is my 1st post... (there goes the cherry)
Here's a screenie anyway:
pacstudios.com/snap20110120_164921.png
Jaskwith said:
Best Quadrant Score seen so far:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10719358&postcount=14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 3100 with cm a few times.
Running CM6.1.2RC2
Over Clocked to 1.5Ghrz
Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
quadrant score
my quadrant score : )
I'm getting 2390 on quadrant with my phone oc'd to 1.4ghz and running the latest version of Iced Glacier ROM. Zero freezing/reboots/lockups and decent battery life, decent battery life even with wifi/bluetooth/gps turned on and connected.
well i was doing some searching and what i found was kind of promising. pantech released a phone with the same dula core qualcomm chipset and its called the sky vega racer. the phone is blazing fast so lets hope we get root soon and can get these babies oc and running to true potential
When we have root, we can do just about anything (G2/DZ was overclocked to 1.8 or even 1.9 GHz)
I am currently using Mike1986's 3.6.7 ROM and Kernel clocked my standard Sensation 4G from 1.211 Ghz (stock) to 1.566Ghz and it is running with out any issues. With Antutu Benchmark at stock 1.2Ghz i was doing around 4200 with it at 1.566Ghz best i was able to benchmark was 5992. Worth it.
dronepro said:
I am currently using Mike1986's 3.6.7 ROM and Kernel clocked my standard Sensation 4G from 1.211 Ghz (stock) to 1.566Ghz and it is running with out any issues. With Antutu Benchmark at stock 1.2Ghz i was doing around 4200 with it at 1.566Ghz best i was able to benchmark was 5992. Worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do realise how old this thread is, don't you? I don't want to sound rude, but it isn't very useful to bring it back up.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using xda premium
Holy necro, Batman.
hey guys i just need a little bit help here.
im new to the sensation
and i am running Bulletproof 2.2.1
and its very slow, and i even get a ****ty score on quadrant
and i see there are several kernals out there and i wanted to know witch ones are compatible with sense 3.5 bulletproof
and witch one is the best one. by best i mean faster overclocked
thanks in advance
You can try Faux or Bricked, both are great.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Faux 0.2.3 is out soon with a whole host of new features, I've found that I can't get Faux 1.89Ghz version to work (boot loops) but it may work for you. Due to this I use Bricked kernel and then I can overclock (if I want to) up to 1.72Ghz which seems to be the max for my chip!
Here's a really good kernel 2.6.35.14-Bricked-v 1.2-gpuoc 320-ondmnd [email protected] #6 this is what I use and It's awesome so far I've been useing this kernel for three days and It's lighting fast
I'm on BP also and while quadrant is low with stock, I've found stock kernel to be smooth and stable. Today I did flash bricked 1.4, and while my CF scores and quadrant went up significanty, I had lag on homescreens and games like asphalt 6 hd. I have no idea what the problem was. It could have been my Rom, or the way I flashed bricked kernel because I have read so many positives with using bricked.
I went back to stock kernel and all is smooth again, but with low benchmarking scores....
So I guess I'm saying take benchmark scores with a grain of salt. Although it would be nice to have my cake and it too.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
whats you quadrant score? i flashed that kernal but i had problems with 3D and he said he fixed it on the latest version 1.4. and when i used setcpu my phone kept rebooting
I don't remember my quadrant score, but CF bench score was really high with bricked 1.4, above GS2.
Now back to stock kernel my CF bench is back to around 5000. Just under the atrix scores.
(But with stock I have no issues with with gameloft games, no lag in asphalt 6 hd.)
I will probably try again in the near future as it could have been user error on my part.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
Fk quadrant scores! It all depends on how ur phone is running
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
g1user101 said:
Fk quadrant scores! It all depends on how ur phone is running
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree!
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using Tapatalk
gustav30 said:
I don't remember my quadrant score, but CF bench score was really high with bricked 1.4, above GS2.
Now back to stock kernel my CF bench is back to around 5000. Just under the atrix scores.
(But with stock I have no issues with with gameloft games, no lag in asphalt 6 hd.)
I will probably try again in the near future as it could have been user error on my part.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
talking about games i havent be able to play them on any rom. some says its not supported and somes dont have the 3d graphics on them
Do the current kernels all have these problems? I would like to know this before I get this phone. And I noticed someone OC'd to 1.8GHz, is this to fix lag or just for fun? Such OC would lead me to question the Sensation's speed quite a bit. Sorry for hijacking the thread, didn't want to make a new one.
Do the current kernels all have these problems? I would like to know this before I get this phone. And I noticed someone OC'd to 1.8GHz, is this to fix lag or just for fun? Such OC would lead me to question the Sensation's speed quite a bit. Sorry for hijacking the thread, didn't want to make a new one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running CM7 SelfKang9, with Faux's AOSP 0.2 Kenrnel (1.78ghz OC) and undervolt (Thermal Patch). Everything is smooth as butter and battery life is beyond excellent (getting avg 6mA idle). If you're interested in benchmarks, I have gotten as high as a 6499 AnTuTu score, and a 7424 in CF bench. It does run fine at its rated speed of 1.5ghz, I'm just always gunning for that extra speed.
Edit: For Comparison, my friend has an Atrix, using CM 7.1 and Faux with a 1.3 ghz OC, and he was getting slightly slower benches (6000 AnTuTu). Although both phones run great.
I'm using pyramid3d 8.0.1 along with the bricked 1.2 kernel.
Runs perfect. No lags, and no other problems, although quadrant scores are really low. Quadrant really means nothing IMO.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
pardoned said:
I'm using pyramid3d 8.0.1 along with the bricked 1.2 kernel.
Runs perfect. No lags, and no other problems, although quadrant scores are really low. Quadrant really means nothing IMO.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense has a nice bug from HTC that affects Quad & other benches negatively, this can be fixed by using AOSP/CM/MIUI, I noticed this on my previous phones. I think HTC has some lingering debugging enabled in Sense.
Louer Adun said:
I am running CM7 SelfKang9, with Faux's AOSP 0.2 Kenrnel (1.78ghz OC) and undervolt (Thermal Patch). Everything is smooth as butter and battery life is beyond excellent (getting avg 6mA idle). If you're interested in benchmarks, I have gotten as high as a 6499 AnTuTu score, and a 7424 in CF bench. It does run fine at its rated speed of 1.5ghz, I'm just always gunning for that extra speed.
Edit: For Comparison, my friend has an Atrix, using CM 7.1 and Faux with a 1.3 ghz OC, and he was getting slightly slower benches (6000 AnTuTu). Although both phones run great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for clearing things up for me, I was worried that the phone had speed issues and the OC was to fix that, now I'm not worried with that anymore. Hopefully I order mines next week, but I plan on undervolting & underclocking, just as I did on my MT4G. Although you benches have restored my confidence in the phone.
Hey guys
I just installed Codename Android 1.5.5 + Matr1x Kernel 18.0 after using CM9 nightly 0304 + Matr1x Kernel 17.5 for a while. I used to run CNA 1.4 but stopped using that as it got very slow after a few hours.
The Quadrant score I was getting on CM9+Matr1x 17.5 was around 2000 with no overclock. Now that I am running CNA 1.5.5 + Matr1x 18.0 i'm only getting a score around 1100...
The ROM feels fine and snappy, but this low score worries me. Is this normal or does this maybe mean there's a problem somewhere?
Thanks!
I'm on same rom same kernel and overclocked to 1430 and only getting 1400s
Ok, so I guess this is normal...
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
I am running 1.5.5, with Air Kernel 3.6, scary governor and overclocked to 1400, I scored around 2600 with this set up on Quadrant.
I tested the rom after flashing it and it scored it at 1100.
Oh I applied the BM tweaks from CNA utility as well
I am waiting to see how the ram holds up, 1.40 would drain after a few hours, as how the battery lasts, so far it is looking good on both of those items.
I haven't tried to many roms, I liked this one as son as I loaded it, loads all my apps from the market, seems very stable even with it overclocked.
I have read that Gingerbread is really stable and fast but I don't want to loose my native music.flac support on this rom. I have read that 4.04 and 4.05 will have better battery, I am hoping so, as I don't want to go backward to Gingerbread unless I have to.
I applied brain masters tweaks and went from around 1100 to 1800 with no overclock and the rom feels much better now. Now I'll just have to see about battery life but I'm a happy man at the moment
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
You are absolutely right. I use the benchmark simply to measure how the rom is before I get a good feel for it. In this case it feels much better after the tweaks.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep .. +1 to that
Clean install using BM rom wipe + Air 3.6 + BM tweaks from CNA1.4 + Deep idle patch for 1.5.5
Deadline + ondemand 100 - 800 with Up Threshold @ 95%.
After 16hrs I've got 68% battery left
Q score between 2000 & 2100 when set to 1000MHz
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree to this.. I rely on the feel of the ROM when I use them..
ljordan2 said:
Quadrant score isn't everything. User experience is a lot more important than benchmarks.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FULL ACK...!
I'm still using 1.4.0 with Air Kernel 3.6 and the supercharger script. I have insanely good performance though battery life has taken a hit over the last few days.
I would like to install BM's tweaks though I'm not sure which version goes with this particular ROM.
If you want higher Quadrant scores try the Trinity T144 kernels. But Quadrant Standard says nothing about the performance of the ROM.. it's just a score.
Yeah, quadrant score isn't everything. The ROM feels fine now but I'm getting the occational freeze requiring a battery pull. I've been running with no overclock but at the moment am running 100/1300 Lulzactive with no issues so far.
Battery life is not good though. I'm at about 50% after 7 hours on battery with light usage
First off, this is not to take anything away from the incredible work put in by everyone. Its awesome that an online community can put so much effort in and share with people they've never met.
That said, have we gained much from this ICS? I was running XBSALL's GB ROM with the Prometheus kernel and it worked very well. 1400MHz, could occasionally free up 300MB RAM, scored 6500 on Antutu and had good battery life. Has this brought us anything more?
I asked this question before the port and was told that ICS will bring features like RAM management etc that will make our phones much better. We are still in the early stages of a ported ICS so we can't expect much yet but will this upgrade make a big difference to our phones?
I'm still quite a noob - GB was a massive improvement over Froyo, will we eventually see the same level of improvement with ICS?
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
I think so but i guess we have to wait for some time.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
In my opinion the Stock ICS is much better than Stock GB...
Also my Antutu Benchmark scores were:
GB: ~4500
ICS: ~5600
GB(Promethius Project 21e + no idea b1) : 7017
Hehe but you cant compare a custom roms score with stock
Sent from my P920 using ICS 4.0.4 by XBSA
No, of course. Well that's a big jump between stock ROMs and your gain was massive. Is there a potential then to hit 8000? That would be incredible.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
LeighR said:
No, of course. Well that's a big jump between stock ROMs and your gain was massive. Is there a potential then to hit 8000? That would be incredible.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol the O3D would blow up if it hit 8000 but i wonder what is the highest possible OC on the O3D it's strange that not all o3D hit the same OC like i Max out @ 1.38
Well the dark lestat used to be able to oc till 1.69 ghz!!! And me 1.5ghz
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Haha well mine was just over 5000 on stock GB and I managed to improve the score by 1400 but this guy jumped his score over 2500.
Regarding overclock, Prometheus did a really excellent job. On a stock ROM, mine was very unstable if over clocked to 1200 but was smooth at 1400 with his custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
I think so , But we must wait for ICS costum roms and kernrals I hope it will make a difference.
Sent from my LG-P920
LeighR said:
Haha well mine was just over 5000 on stock GB and I managed to improve the score by 1400 but this guy jumped his score over 2500.
Regarding overclock, Prometheus did a really excellent job. On a stock ROM, mine was very unstable if over clocked to 1200 but was smooth at 1400 with his custom kernel.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tru ICS Needs Samno's Kernel
TMProduct1onZ said:
In my opinion the Stock ICS is much better than Stock GB...
Also my Antutu Benchmark scores were:
GB: ~4500
ICS: ~5600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your stock GB vs stock ICS Rom figures. Good to have this kind of comparison.
Sent from my LG-SU870 using xda premium
ICS make a better use of RAM resources. This can be seen by exiting from games or browsers.
According to speed - maximum benchmarks should be the same on the same MHz. And the MHz depend on the voltage (and this is s.t. that you do not want to increase too much unless you want to charge it every 2h or have a NONmobile phone). And the voltage depend on the kernel. So... in this aspect - they are the same (probably 5% more points gained from different tweaks in the kernel but nobody can say for GB or ICS )
Ability to somewhat multitask by holding down the home button is quite nice.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
biggest differnce? now you can use ics apps... NBA 2K13 yeeeeeeaaaaa
OK, having played around with this, it is a much more efficient firmware. RAM management is better, giving faster performance.
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
LeighR said:
That said, have we gained much from this ICS? I was running XBSALL's GB ROM with the Prometheus kernel and it worked very well. 1400MHz, could occasionally free up 300MB RAM, scored 6500 on Antutu and had good battery life. Has this brought us anything more?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW 1400mhz,, never been stable for me 1356 was best imo. i used a few ROMS from here,, i liked cm7 but i didnt like the fact had no 3D , so after trial and error i ended staying with thaiz ROM
after a few headaches and watery eyes ive managed to install ICS big thx xbsalls :good:
on stock rom and kernel , scored 33xx(variable) on quadrant which is pretty impressive me thinks
i love the new rom, and all its features its bit like cm but with 3d lol
going to try and root and install custom rom next
OOOh BTW Ucam also swaps the camera round, its in settings
MattJaO3D said:
WOW 1400mhz,, never been stable for me 1356 was best imo. i used a few ROMS from here,, i liked cm7 but i didnt like the fact had no 3D , so after trial and error i ended staying with thaiz ROM
after a few headaches and watery eyes ive managed to install ICS big thx xbsalls :good:
on stock rom and kernel , scored 33xx(variable) on quadrant which is pretty impressive me thinks
i love the new rom, and all its features its bit like cm but with 3d lol
going to try and root and install custom rom next
OOOh BTW Ucam also swaps the camera round, its in settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
may be you need a refreshment about GB speed
Look at my old benches:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1200179&d=1342373661
Is battery life any better on ICS?
Depend on kernel you use.
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda app-developers app
I'm finding battery life worse but I was using a custom kernel before. Its not horrendous like froyo though
Sent from my LG-SU760 using xda app-developers app
p-vlad said:
may be you need a refreshment about GB speed
Look at my old benches:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1200179&d=1342373661
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW i was using Acura 3D max for a while but couldnt get a signal with the maximo speed kernels not sure why, only kernel that worked for me was Titan 0.6+
TBH i had to use Titan kernel for most non CM roms in order to get signal, maybe it was my baseband, im still on a massive learning curve lol
The fastet Rom i personally tested for GB was JOY OS , boy that was lightening quick , 4000 - 4200 plus on quadrant
:good:
thx for the info though buddy