I submited my quadrant score using antutu bencmark minutes ago and i saw someone score 6xxx.someone from united state.same phone android version 2.3.x. is that real?do nexus s can get quadrant score as high as that person get?im kinda confuse here.even i already tried to oc/uv my nexus s using diffrent oc kernel with diffrent voltage even diffrnt rom.i still cant get the score more than 41xx...can someone share something about it?im just i little bit "wow is that for real?"
P/s i never found any on utube or google as well.is that somekind of dev trick?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mijul mojas said:
I submited my quadrant score using antutu bencmark minutes ago and i saw someone score 6xxx.someone from united state.same phone android version 2.3.x. is that real?do nexus s can get quadrant score as high as that person get?im kinda confuse here.even i already tried to oc/uv my nexus s using diffrent oc kernel with diffrent voltage even diffrnt rom.i still cant get the score more than 41xx...can someone share something about it?im just i little bit "wow is that for real?"
P/s i never found any on utube or google as well.is that somekind of dev trick?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was probably Simms22, I've seen him hit 6000 on his Google+, I'm pretty sure he's posted it on this forum as well. 1.6ghz OC or 1.7, I can't remember which one it was.
Haha yup that was simms22. He has a killer nexus s Lol.
Sent from my CM9 Alpha10 Linux S 4G using xda premium
yup, it probably was me. but there are others too. a few days ago someone posted here on xda a quadrant of 6134. my higest were on a few different trinity kernels with cm7, ranging from 1.5ghz and up. heres one of them...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
simms22 said:
yup, it probably was me. but there are others too. a few days ago someone posted here on xda a quadrant of 6134. my higest were on a few different trinity kernels with cm7, ranging from 1.5ghz and up. heres one of them...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're the "Power" user!!!
simms22 said:
yup, it probably was me. but there are others too. a few days ago someone posted here on xda a quadrant of 6134. my higest were on a few different trinity kernels with cm7, ranging from 1.5ghz and up. heres one of them...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wowww...ur nexus is amazing..what did u do to ur nexus?did ur nexua got battery drain?will u suggest something? hahaha
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mijul mojas said:
Wowww...ur nexus is amazing..what did u do to ur nexus?did ur nexua got battery drain?will u suggest something? hahaha
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a massive CPU and bus overclock leading to this. Not a daily driver setting, it will chew through your battery and it's not entirely stable. Only for the purpose of breaking records.
wow..6xxx quadrant...haha
how about a battery life?
chalzz said:
wow..6xxx quadrant...haha
how about a battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There might be no battery life
Wow... What kernel did you guys use?
polobunny said:
It's a massive CPU and bus overclock leading to this. Not a daily driver setting, it will chew through your battery and it's not entirely stable. Only for the purpose of breaking records.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats an understatement. it slurps battery juice faster than we breathe air, at that speed. but, it is entirely stable and fun to play with when plugged in
---------- Post added at 03:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:49 PM ----------
shockem said:
Wow... What kernel did you guys use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
trinity(with cm7 kangs). there are quite a few different versions of trinity that will achieve these scores. from 1.44ghz and up.
Isn't that I/O score achieved by Quadrant flipping **** and giving an error for the I/O tests? Only impressive thing is the CPU score.
shockem said:
Wow... What kernel did you guys use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trinity..
With matr1x i get around 52xx..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
mKTank said:
Isn't that I/O score achieved by Quadrant flipping **** and giving an error for the I/O tests? Only impressive thing is the CPU score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, thats without that cheat. with the cheat i/o is 16000-18000. theres no reason to be cheating here
simms22 said:
thats an understatement. it slurps battery juice faster than we breathe air, at that speed. but, it is entirely stable and fun to play with when plugged in
---------- Post added at 03:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:49 PM ----------
trinity(with cm7 kangs). there are quite a few different versions of trinity that will achieve these scores. from 1.44ghz and up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
al_madd said:
Trinity..
With matr1x i get around 52xx..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There goes i'm gonna try out trinity Did you guys up the voltage and by how much? Thanks
So, does the phone melt itself at those speeds? Wonder i people would actually find a use for this doing multi-player online gaming??
Related
Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Not my work just fyo
It's awesome. I just turned 2532 on quadrant
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
jonathanphx1 said:
Check rom manager in the download roms section there is Drod's 1.5ghz kernal pulled 2495 quadrant thus far will play with it some more though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please post this kind of stuff in general, if ur not releasing something. This crap clogs up the forums . Save this stuff for twitter.
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Jaywan said:
You should add a download link so people have options good job... Please post more info about ur kernel...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the free section of the free Rom Manager app.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Jaywan said:
Let's see a 1.8ghz and 1.9ghz first then a safe 2.0ghz... Development is starting to pick up for this device...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
babybacon said:
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is so true. I underclocked my phone to 768MHz to try out how it would work for a day. I ended up entirely forgetting I had done that until I ran a benchmark.
seeing all this is amazing, I am very tempted to try it out, but this beast is super fast with having to OC it, lol
destroyerbmx said:
finally the cpu is unlocked, the MSM8655 is speced to 1.4ghz and should not harm a single thing running it at that all day long, lets press to 2.0ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if you're right or not but I just flashed the 1.5 kernel and at 1.4 this thing is as fast as a computer..I hope you're right because I don't wanna go back to 1ghz..
Got 2016 quadrant after a reboot which is 300 higher than I got at 1 gig..
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/specs
Right below the dual core, High performance Smart Phones section. MSM8655 is our processor, it comes @ 1.0ghz, plam pre3 has the same and it comes @ 1.4ghz. The chip can take it but I think it was lowered for battery concern. I notice a lot of speed just flying through different programs when OC to 1.5, it opens them much faster, could be the I/O tweaks as well though. As for PC, mine puts out 42 gflops compared to my phones 49 mflops, still a long way off, thats 0.001% of the processing power. This phone is no slouch, so I guess it speaks more for my computers power.
sweet....im just gonna run it at 1.4 and since i have the 2750 battery i'm not gonna worry about battery life at all. i love this phone right now..
babybacon said:
1804 has already been achieved. I think were going to get a stable zone at 1.5ghz.
but really this phone even clocked at 768mhz is still blazing fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is the 1.8ghz kernel can someone post or pm me the link to it...
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Pulled 2310 on quadrant.
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App
this thing is ridiculous at 1.5 I cant wait to see 2+
battery life at 1.5 seems at least the same if not better than at 1.0
Had the same CPU on my inspire - 1.6 was basically the highest I could take it without crashing.
OP will we can u make one for 2.3.3 sense so I can port this Rom also a asop 2.2 kernel for my liquidmetal plz..
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA Premium App
Would like to compare my score to yours.
Here's mine using ARHD and Blades kernel -meh
TF101 ww B80
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That frequency don't look right what clock settings where you using at the time?
And ill post mine later when i get some time
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Danzano said:
That frequency don't look right what clock settings where you using at the time?
And ill post mine later when i get some time
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Time Zone: GMT +03:00 Arabian Standard Time
The frequency is really strange, the reason why I requested for some screenshots
to compare.
Any ideas?
is antutu not working in compatibility mode?
maybe it's just layout problem OR a rom going to check it out when im at home
FROZN beta with stock kernel
Frozn beta with blades
will tweak more later try get a higher score
After first tweak now at 7232
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
team eos rom..13 to be exact with performance and deadline.that's the best my tf could do.sorry but i didn't find the screenshot option
scottyf79 said:
FROZN beta with stock kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cant see your screenshot.. ^__^
Not sure if mine is just a beast or if its my setup
ARHD 1.3 and Blades meh at 1656 ondemand/noop
mrevankyle said:
Not sure if mine is just a beast or if its my setup
ARHD 1.3 and Blades meh at 1656 ondemand/noop
View attachment 966407
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG! 7981
Would you like to share your set up?
Your TF is a bish!
j3tt3 said:
OMG! 7981
Would you like to share your set up?
Your TF is a bish!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All it it is Android Revolution HD 1.3 with blades kernel-meh running at 1656 (because the top frequency is unstable and actually makes it slower) with the interactive governer (thought i was on ondemand but just checked again) and i used task killer to free up ram before i ran the test. I also used v6 supercharger with option 8 a few days ago but didn't really notice a difference with it. I remember in the early days of the transformer there was talk about having different quality of chips and i remember mine testing very high so that might have something to do with it as well
The highest so far was 7522 on arhd / blades -meh at 1656..
This is my latest 7154 at 1592mhz...
Looks like my 3d graphics score is much higher than yours not sure why that would be though
Danzano said:
Frozn beta with blades
will tweak more later try get a higher score
After first tweak now at 7232
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please be so kind to post the link of frozn beta... just want to test..
cant find it (or too lazy to dig) ^__^.
Thanks!
Just wondering, do you guys run these clocks 24h a day or are they benchmarks clocks only?
I have tried overclocking the beast a bit, but it would generate much more heat when overclocked. It also crashed on me
j3tt3 said:
Please be so kind to post the link of frozn beta... just want to test..
cant find it (or too lazy to dig) ^__^.
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you go to the thread and volunteer to test a couple apks jcarrzs said thats a way to get into the beta test group
Also my tf has never been stable over 1592 hoping maybe ics will change that for me so i could get beast scores to lol
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
muryoh said:
Just wondering, do you guys run these clocks 24h a day or are they benchmarks clocks only?
I have tried overclocking the beast a bit, but it would generate much more heat when overclocked. It also crashed on me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to find the sweet spot for your tf dont push it to high because it becomes unstable not to low or there's no point in over clocking so its about balance
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
muryoh said:
Just wondering, do you guys run these clocks 24h a day or are they benchmarks clocks only?
I have tried overclocking the beast a bit, but it would generate much more heat when overclocked. It also crashed on me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks. I ran Antutu only after flashing / testing roms. It appears that Blades-meh kernel /ARHD has the highest score on my TF with several crashes before or during the test.
You can share your score to compare.
Here you go! First one is my stable conf, second one is just for show
(haha they show up in reverse order, obviously the stable one is the second picture )
tested guevor's test4 with 1.6mhz new kernel...
my score OCd at 1.5mhz +25mV...
here's the link in case you wish to try...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1565519
i downloaded the last version of quadrant from google play and im getting very low scores with my atrix 2..
i don't have any widgets, live wallpapers , 3rd party launchers, etc that could affect the results..
my scores are:
total: 1906
cpu: 1977
mem: 2471
2d: 211
3d: 2029
the max score i've got is about 2100.. and the average for this phone must be around 2600-3000 if im not wrong, i haven't installed any custom rom, i have the stock GB 2.3.6
what could be the problem ???
Try using AnTuTu and see what your marks are like...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
I got 2121 total from my last Quadrant test... so, your score sounds about right.
With Antutu I got a score of 5914.
Currently on Remus 2.0 @ 1142 MHz
Sent from my phone's mind
alteredlikeness said:
I got 2121 total from my last Quadrant test... so, your score sounds about right.
With Antutu I got a score of 5914.
Currently on Remus 2.0 @ 1142 MHz
Sent from my phone's mind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got 4436
rodmc123 said:
i got 4436
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that is low... even for stock.
Something's not right... no idea what, but it's something..
You got a screenshot of your Antutu results? Maybe we could see what's dragging your score down..
Sent from my phone's mind
alteredlikeness said:
Yup, that is low... even for stock.
Something's not right... no idea what, but it's something..
You got a screenshot of your Antutu results? Maybe we could see what's dragging your score down..
Sent from my phone's mind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i restarted the phone and now i've got 5237!
i think that is more average.
rodmc123 said:
i restarted the phone and now i've got 5237!
i think that is more average.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There you go... that sounds right (that about what my wife's stock A2 gets).
And, yea, it can get bogged down after long periods of use without rebooting..
Moto recommends at least one reboot a day (at least they did to me when trying to troubleshoot my brick)!
Also, you can put most all of your apps on the Auto-End list in the stock Task Manager, and try Cache Cleaner from the Play Store... also good to clean up the dalivk-cache once in a while... might help keep you running smoother.
Sent from my phone's mind
alteredlikeness said:
There you go... that sounds right (that about what my wife's stock A2 gets).
And, yea, it can get bogged down after long periods of use without rebooting..
Moto recommends at least one reboot a day (at least they did to me when trying to troubleshoot my brick)!
Also, you can put most all of your apps on the Auto-End list in the stock Task Manager, and try Cache Cleaner from the Play Store... also good to clean up the dalivk-cache once in a while... might help keep you running smoother.
Sent from my phone's mind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 6008 on battery.... Scv7 with speedup add-on and update1 applied ...1200mhz stock....
NovaLauncher Prime and BeWeather Pro in Notification bar...
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Mines lovely...This is mine on SCV7 Speed boosted and OC'd at 1.2. Got a nice score though:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
DX2Trip said:
Mines lovely...This is mine on SCV7 Speed boosted and OC'd at 1.2. Got a nice score though:
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine ranges from 5200-5600.
I've seen scores up to 6500, how do you achieve that?
I'm using SCV7 without the latest patch (CS + Speed boost), does it change that much?
Motorola lied and I'm still locked mb865
Deivid_ said:
Mine ranges from 5200-5600.
I've seen scores up to 6500, how do you achieve that?
I'm using SCV7 without the latest patch (CS + Speed boost), does it change that much?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yes, latest speed boost and then the OC 1.2 after puts this phone into lightspeed. Never been more satisfied with performance on here now. Give it a go and check out the difference...n daaaammm dude look at the score above this reply...I'm sure thats on SCV7 as well with latest speed boost.
Edit: Scores were higher just now...don't know why, got more apps then first test lol. All good though.
Sent From My Locked Down, Rooted, Motorola Atrix 2-MB865 (AT&T U.S.A.) Runnin' SCV7, Speed Boosted & OC'd @ 1.2 GHz ICS (Leak) 4.0.4
DX2Trip said:
Oh yes, latest speed boost and then the OC 1.2 after puts this phone into lightspeed. Never been more satisfied with performance on here now. Give it a go and check out the difference...n daaaammm dude look at the score above this reply...I'm sure thats on SCV7 as well with latest speed boost.
Edit: Scores were higher just now...don't know why, got more apps then first test lol. All good though.
Sent From My Locked Down, Rooted, Motorola Atrix 2-MB865 (AT&T U.S.A.) Runnin' SCV7, Speed Boosted & OC'd @ 1.2 GHz ICS (Leak) 4.0.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually if you're referring to mine it's not scv7. It's my own custom odexed rom. Minimal tweaks done here and there but I'm pleased with it.
Edit: also I've beat that score
Motorola lied and I'm still locked mb865
Hey Devs, and geeks !
I wanted to ask if OC kernals with massive OCing like Cranium with 1.6Ghz OC, really work..... Or they're just working like placebo pills
And if they do work why don't the devs develop a similar Massive OC kernal for ICS and JB ?! :angel::victory:
OC just boosts your AnTuTu benchmark scores. And, OCing might cause NAND burning problem. Make sure you know what you are doing... And, 1.4 GHz overclocking isn't useful, because, 800 MHz OC's itself are giving an AnTuTu benchmark of 4k+. So...
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
vineethraj49 said:
OC just boosts your AnTuTu benchmark scores. And, OCing might cause NAND burning problem. Make sure you know what you are doing... And, 1.4 GHz overclocking isn't useful, because, 800 MHz OC's itself are giving an AnTuTu benchmark of 4k+. So...
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and also the OC by cranium kernel is not true OC
the developer sakindia himself said that
it will overheat your mobile for sure though
Humm....
vineethraj49 said:
OC just boosts your AnTuTu benchmark scores. And, OCing might cause NAND burning problem. Make sure you know what you are doing... And, 1.4 GHz overclocking isn't useful, because, 800 MHz OC's itself are giving an AnTuTu benchmark of 4k+. So...
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still if the clock frequencies change ( in this case go up ) the phone does perform better in tasks because you are giving it more voltage to do so ... (if i am wrong correct me ) :angel:
And you're right about NAND burning , Happened to a friend of mine Pain in the butt to fix it :laugh:
Hehe..
Prash8429 said:
and also the OC by cranium kernel is not true OC
the developer sakindia himself said that
it will overheat your mobile for sure though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And drain your battery too ! :laugh::highfive:
EvilizedDead said:
And drain your battery too ! :laugh::highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. it's fake overclock. Will not drain battery. For a fact, cranium kernel ~it's the best battery saving kernel ever.
EvilizedDead said:
Still if the clock frequencies change ( in this case go up ) the phone does perform better in tasks because you are giving it more voltage to do so ... (if i am wrong correct me ) :angel:
And you're right about NAND burning , Happened to a friend of mine Pain in the butt to fix it :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it's true and safe overclock ,yes it'll improve performance. But not worth the hassle of recovering burnt nand and/or losing your phone
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
BANNED said:
No.. it's fake overclock. Will not drain battery. For a fact, cranium kernel ~it's the best battery saving kernel ever.
If it's true and safe overclock ,yes it'll improve performance. But not worth the hassle of recovering burnt nand and/or losing your phone
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum Hum ! As for me I hope that someone will build a Massive OC kernal for JB or ICS ! :fingers-crossed::laugh: Or I will learn how to make it ! And when I do, And Pico isn't my daily driver ill push it off the cliffs !
EvilizedDead said:
Hum Hum ! As for me I hope that someone will build a Massive OC kernal for JB or ICS ! :fingers-crossed::laugh: Or I will learn how to make it ! And when I do, And Pico isn't my daily driver ill push it off the cliffs !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:thumbup:
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Sorry to interfere but when I asked Sarthak.. Then he told me that the clock values on 1.3 GHz were similar to the ones in 800mhz now.. So I guess that was a half fake over clock. Cause benchmarks were rising.. Then of course can't happen automagically... Although I don't trust benchmarks too much.. Very inconsistent at times
I'm on my tab
red-devil said:
Sorry to interfere but when I asked Sarthak.. Then he told me that the clock values on 1.3 GHz were similar to the ones in 800mhz now.. So I guess that was a half fake over clock. Cause benchmarks were rising.. Then of course can't happen automagically... Although I don't trust benchmarks too much.. Very inconsistent at times
I'm on my tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sak still on xda?? Well, I remember him saying it increased only 2 float points.. compared to 200float points on a 800 kernel
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
BANNED said:
Sak still on xda?? Well, I remember him saying it increased only 2 float points.. compared to 200float points on a 800 kernel
Sent from my HTC Explorer A310e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was on fb when I replied to someones doubt saying that cranium was fake overclock
I'm on my tab
I stand corrected its 737 mhz
And I got some proof
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
---------- Post added at 10:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:05 PM ----------
Bump
I'm on my tab
red-devil said:
That was on fb when I replied to someones doubt saying that cranium was fake overclock
I'm on my tab
I stand corrected its 737 mhz
And I got some proof
---------- Post added at 10:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:05 PM ----------
[/COLOR]Bump
I'm on my tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Off the topic :laugh::highfive: Thanks for the PORN link it was useful XD
can anyone make superwipe script with erase_image or flash_erase command for burn nand?
I have just run (a few times) on my Galaxy Ace 2 and got this result so is this the fastest (hardware unmodified) Ace 2 in the world???
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
[/URL][/IMG]
p24hrsmith said:
I have just run (a few times) on my Galaxy Ace 2 and got this result so is this the fastest (hardware unmodified) Ace 2 in the world???
[/URL][/IMG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, i think str3tch or someone elses might be much, much faster... i can set performance/sio and receive a score of 86xx
E: and please dont create 2 threads just to show something you think is, 'cool'(is there a way to say it without offending anyone?)
Oh spit thats bust my bubble but are they using a stock ROM and hardware? lol ... 2 post are due to the no link policy before you have done 10 posts which I fully understand and I didn't want to be an arse and post smiley face replies or something silly just to get my post count up
p24hrsmith said:
Oh spit thats bust my bubble but are they using a stock ROM and hardware? lol ... 2 post are due to the no link policy before you have done 10 posts which I fully understand and I didn't want to be an arse and post smiley face replies or something silly just to get my post count up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, only on kernels which version is 3.0101 (excluding s-kernel)
don't be too trusting with the benchmark
Sooo u get 8487 points in antutu, and? I dont see the point of creating new thread in which u will just show us ur score. It would WOW WOW WOW if u would score 9k+
8,5k is normal score.
Btw. if u wanna do screnshot just POW&VOL- or POW&VOL-&HOME depend of firmware
I went with what I could find
artur1131 said:
Sooo u get 8487 points in antutu, and? I dont see the point of creating new thread in which u will just show us ur score. It would WOW WOW WOW if u would score 9k+
8,5k is normal score.
Btw. if u wanna do screnshot just POW&VOL- or POW&VOL-&HOME depend of firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These where the results I found before I posted this so all I had to work on. I found plenty of videos images and reviews also stating 4k to 5k but yes after a great deal of in-depth searching I have since found scores of around 84xx but all of them were using a custom rom I'm using a stock rom and as I started with 4333 a score of 8487 is WOW WOW WOW
http://antutu.com/view.shtml?id=2869
If you had read my post you quoted you would know why I did a second post and does it really matter
p24hrsmith said:
These where the results I found before I posted this so all I had to work on. I found plenty of videos images and reviews also stating 4k to 5k but yes after a great deal of in-depth searching I have since found scores of around 84xx but all of them were using a custom rom I'm using a stock rom and as I started with 4333 a score of 8487 is WOW WOW WOW
http://antutu.com/view.shtml?id=2869
If you had read my post you quoted you would know why I did a second post and does it really matter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, kyrillos and stock can easily reach 8.5k when it comes to antutu v4
Maybe AnTuTu should be ask why scores are higher
teddytsen said:
lol, kyrillos and stock can easily reach 8.5k when it comes to antutu v4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As AnTuTulads are members here and if what you are saying is correct (i'm guessing you mean scores are higher in v4 compared to earlier versions) and ask them to explain. Maybe someone like yourself who has a better knowledge than me of past and present scores
zakiprasasti69 said:
don't be too trusting with the benchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha like it
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
New antutu version have different scoring system
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
Sent from my GT-I8160 using bad english
koalasakti said:
Hahaha like it
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not understand with Antutu .. when i first used it score satisfactorily, but at the time the score twice to be down, but no setting is changed. I now believe to be lacking any Benchmark Test! :silly:
*cough* *cough*
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
James_Feltham said:
*cough* *cough*
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rom and mhz plz
Enviado desde mi GT-I8160
zakiprasasti69 said:
I do not understand with Antutu .. when i first used it score satisfactorily, but at the time the score twice to be down, but no setting is changed. I now believe to be lacking any Benchmark Test! :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right. Same for me.
dirtyl0lharry said:
Rom and mhz plz
Enviado desde mi GT-I8160
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 11
1228mhz
Performance
Deadline
Phone gets pretty hot though
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
With cm11 I managed to get 11800 points
James_Feltham said:
CM 11
1228mhz
Performance
Deadline
Phone gets pretty hot though
Sent from my GT-I8160 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
42%C ?
i think that was too much and unsafe
julianwp said:
42%C ?
i think that was too much and unsafe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not too much and its safe.