everyone start tweeting nvidiategra to get teh source code
If you cant read it all those tweets say this
You guys need to release the source code for the tegra 2 thats inside the g2x,you guys dont know how to code give it to XDA nOW
Done
10chars
will do
done---hapy to help in any way I can.
Will do when I get on my PC tonight!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
this should be stickied so eeryone can see it and we get that source code
Pointless. XDA are .2 percent of all users, they don't give a rat's ass. We've been through this on the Epic fora.
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
killjoy much
Vendors don't release proprietary driver source code unless you are covered by an NDA. You aren't going to get it. I got Marvell to give me source code once but under an NDA and it was extremely difficult to do and took a long time. Also, since I was under an NDA it which meant I had the code but could not disclose any of it or give it to anyone else, period. Sorry, but those tweets will just be wasted key presses.
sorry, guys, nagging nvida will get you nowhere!
I'm curious as to why people imagine this might happen? Is there a precedent that h/w vendors for Android platforms have released source for drivers? Or released specs (like register maps) for hardware? Some h/w vendors don't even write drivers for h/w - that's what gives embedded C programmers like me job security (I've been involved in plenty of NDAs like mentioned above).
So what is the "norm" for the Android platform?
Maybe, Just Maybe
we can bug the hell out the CIA and find out who killed JFK! Was there really a UFO at Roswell?
You guys need to release the source code for the tegra 2 thats inside the g2x,you guys dont know how to code give it to XDA nOW
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you really think that after sending them the above message they are going to say what? "Sure, we know we can't code so here, take all of our hard work and make it work cause we are idiots!" You have a better chance of getting the answers from the CIA.
probably right
dkb218 said:
we can bug the hell out the CIA and find out who killed JFK! Was there really a UFO at Roswell?
So you really think that after sending them the above message they are going to say what? "Sure, we know we can't code so here, take all of our hard work and make it work cause we are idiots!" You have a better chance of getting the answers from the CIA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and we all know the shot really came from roswell not the bush.
But i heard all the same things when people complained about locked bootloaders
they dont care you make up 1/2 a percent etc.
you dont get anywhere without trying.
I think this helped us to get ginger bread... Worth a try.
Sent from my Blue Steel Weapon!
Done I hope this helps
KingDavid63 said:
I think this helped us to get ginger bread... Worth a try.
Sent from my Blue Steel Weapon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. I posted on Facebook.
hmmm seems interesting
Did you get the source code yet?
hey, head on over to the nvidia developer zone at the link below and post a comment, I'm never going to buy another tegra powered device until they release the HAL source for at the very least the A2DP
Nvidia developers page, thread about opening the HAL
Sad how this is the only thing keeping my phone from being perfect, this too will be my last nvidia device...
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Yeah I think imma leave nvidia alone after this also.
Related
On the Lg forums.. Think he's telling the truth? I guess this is better then nothing at all.
Posted by SmartPhoneGeek on 28 Jun 2011 18:53 PM:
As much as I hate to I have to keep things very generic and can't talk about details until an official release is announced. Hopefully my generic comments are better than nothing for you.
It's been working very well for me with improvements everywhere. I'm actually surprised this is not the final version as it feels pretty solid to me. Seeing how well this version is working it seems as if they must be close to completion. And if this version did not pass testing then they must really be putting a lot of emphasis on quality.
http://www.lgforum.com/forum/boards...artphonegeek-dot-dot-dot-its-another-week-and
Those guys are idiots. Seriously. Where was all that testing before the phone was released? Stop playing games... Some people have barely functioning phones and they are stay tight lipped about everything. How about a small patch just to fix the rebooting in the interim? No? Nothing.
No issues with my phone, just frustrated at their handling.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
if some people have "barely functioning phones" it isn't a software upgrade they need.
Well, SmartPhoneGeek is probably the nicest and most responsive mod on the LG forums. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say that he's probably telling the truth.
LordIzod said:
Well, SmartPhoneGeek is probably the nicest and most responsive mod on the LG forums. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say that he's probably telling the truth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think anyone intends to lie. I think they are guilty of embelishing what they have heard or think. We take that embelishment and do critical reviews to the tune of multiple threads with alot of views and replies.
I would think the 1place you could get controlled information that is close to the source would be lg's own forum. They may not be reading from a script but betcha they are reading from something close to official.
From the sounds of it, 2 more weeks. I think someone here said July 15th....and the winning number is...
how about instead of a bunch of half-witted liars testing it they give us a dump of what they have so far, release the source code and let us test it and the devs help out with the process
JHaste said:
how about instead of a bunch of half-witted liars testing it they give us a dump of what they have so far, release the source code and let us test it and the devs help out with the process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A www man, where's the love!!! They are not liars, they're misled. Anyway, if they are liars, and you know it, why you asking about something you already know they don't know the a answer to?
You ask my girlfriend about nuclear physics, she will answer you. With what, is your guess...
alodar1 said:
A www man, where's the love!!! They are not liars, they're misled. Anyway, if they are liars, and you know it, why you asking about something you already know they don't know the a answer to?
You ask my girlfriend about nuclear physics, she will answer you. With what, is your guess...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuclear Physics...now that a good one
I said July 17th
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
laker666 said:
I said July 17th
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're on the clock!!!
Corporate fanboys will always make something sound good so people will stfu
G2x with CM7 and faux kernel. NONSENSE!!!!
tackleberry said:
Corporate fanboys will always make something sound good so people will stfu
G2x with CM7 and faux kernel. NONSENSE!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If their job is to put best face on it so be it. I doubt their job is to lie. If they out and out pied, they'd be unemployed
Cross-posting this from the LG G2X Cyanogen forums.
In case you missed it there is now a bounty on issue 4105 aka "no bluetooth stereo". As of this writing it's over $100 and though that probably won't cover the hours it takes to track down the Bluetooth driver and port it, it will buy a few cases of beer to celebrate.
I'd post a link, but I can't yet because I'm a newb - so you'll have to trust me.
Is this even possible??? Would they have to make a driver from scratch??? If it is possible and legit im down for adding to the pot.
It was my understanding that nVidia needed to release the source code for their drivers to get this to happen? I'm not holding my breath on that happening. I would really like to see the Bluetooth issues worked out though.
DECIM8 said:
It was my understanding that nVidia needed to release the source code for their drivers to get this to happen? I'm not holding my breath on that happening. I would really like to see the Bluetooth issues worked out though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..maybe NVidia wants the $100
Anything is possible. It's not easy, and very Time consuming, to reverse engineer drivers.
Sent from my LG-P999
dreggs said:
..maybe NVidia wants the $100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol that's awesome
That is the pretty ****ty thing about NVidia. If they are going to keep their doors closed then at least provide updated drivers frequently.
Maybe when Tegra 3 comes out they'll release Tegra 2.
I've seen so many devs so so many near impossible things here are XDA that I know someone will crack it. I think they are just being lazy now (which is smart) because why waste time and energy if NVidia will release it shortly? But now that we're finding out that it probably won't happen that hopefully they'll start crackin' on it.
I would add to the pot if someone can provide a link
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
player911 said:
That is the pretty ****ty thing about NVidia. If they are going to keep their doors closed then at least provide updated drivers frequently.
Maybe when Tegra 3 comes out they'll release Tegra 2.
I've seen so many devs so so many near impossible things here are XDA that I know someone will crack it. I think they are just being lazy now (which is smart) because why waste time and energy if NVidia will release it shortly? But now that we're finding out that it probably won't happen that hopefully they'll start crackin' on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be next to impossible. Nvidia is not open source friendy.
I think this will work. If many are doubting, better check out hd2 android...
Sent from my Calculator with Android.
To write a driver, you need a register set. Apparently that is part of the IP NVidia isn't up-ing, at least not without an NDA. Without a register set, have fun...
So if you signed the NDA, get the register set description (which may come with sample code), wrote a lib, and posted the lib (but not the source code) here, would that violate the NDA?
I would add to the pot as well. I would LOVE to see this happen.
namklak said:
To write a driver, you need a register set. Apparently that is part of the IP NVidia isn't up-ing, at least not without an NDA. Without a register set, have fun...
So if you signed the NDA, get the register set description (which may come with sample code), wrote a lib, and posted the lib (but not the source code) here, would that violate the NDA?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that should not violate the NDA. The NDA covers the source code they provide to you to develop your products. The work product is okay to distribute as long as you don't disclose the source code.
I will donate of we find somone that is capable. Maybe we can drag another dev into a g2x as a result as well. Love this phone. Hopefully more will realize its superior smoothness to the crapsation.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Ill trow down $30 on the pot.
I would definitely chip in for the bounty as well if someone could get a2dp/bluetooth to work. I've been pretty disappointed with my g2x and it's because of this.
CM_arcee tweeted it is working on 2x, i think we have a2dp thanks to the fine devs here!
http://tinyurl.com/66zc8un
fcisco13 said:
CM_arcee tweeted it is working on 2x, i think we have a2dp thanks to the fine devs here!
http://tinyurl.com/66zc8un
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummmmmm...... wow.
If this is coming out in a CM7 rom soon then where do I sign up to donate!!!!
maciek82 said:
Ummmmmm...... wow.
If this is coming out in a CM7 rom soon then where do I sign up to donate!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will soon be in cm7! CM_arcee is the man to thank/donate.
This will make cm7 complete and my g2x perfect.
fcisco13 said:
It will soon be in cm7! CM_arcee is the man to thank/donate.
This will make cm7 complete and my g2x perfect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the next release list, a2dp workaround is aready there. Probably come out within the week, maybe tomorrow. Check out the CM7 changelog page of g2x p999.
Sent from my Calculator with Android.
jose makalolot said:
In the next release list, a2dp workaround is aready there. Probably come out within the week, maybe tomorrow. Check out the CM7 changelog page of g2x p999.
Sent from my Calculator with Android.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already used it at work, thanks fits!
is there any possibility that ICS rom is ported to INFUSE 4G?
Fail...you know what, I'm not going to flame you. How about you go to the other bajillion threads on noobs asking for ICS and consider the flaming there "yours."
And you'd think after being a member since 09, you would read first...
xIC-MACIx said:
Fail...you know what, I'm not going to flame you. How about you go to the other bajillion threads on noobs asking for ICS and consider the flaming there "yours."
And you'd think after being a member since 09, you would read first...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will Samsung release an ICS update For us
No
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
What about a "leak"
No...lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
aly_hosny said:
What about a "leak"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't have ice cream until you're done eating yogurt. When you're full, you can have gingerbread. After gingerbread, you can trade it in for a Captivate and put ice cream on it.
Or just buy a phone that is actually supported by samy... Us Infusers are just going to be perpetually left out of the freezer... No sammiches for us
problem around here is the developers never wanted to work with what we have. froyo alone has a ton of potential left in it but with Sammy dangling gb in our faces the devs that made the infuse what it is just got to a point that it was a waiting game and they got tired of waiting. I think the best plan is to work with what we have and make the most out of it. stop jerking around wanting what's not there and just make the most of what is there. froyo on the galaxy s was miles beyond the infuse to the point I was uneasy about upgrading to gb on my cappy.
infuse owners have to realize the infuse has an expiration date. next time get an international flasgship or something closely related to it, that or a nexus where you will have updates for several years coming.
Translation
Dani897 said:
problem around here is the developers never wanted to work with what we have. froyo alone has a ton of potential left in it but with Sammy dangling gb in our faces the devs that made the infuse what it is just got to a point that it was a waiting game and they got tired of waiting. I think the best plan is to work with what we have and make the most out of it. stop jerking around wanting what's not there and just make the most of what is there. froyo on the galaxy s was miles beyond the infuse to the point I was uneasy about upgrading to gb on my cappy.
infuse owners have to realize the infuse has an expiration date. next time get an international flasgship or something closely related to it, that or a nexus where you will have updates for several years coming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, everyone, I just thought I'd help translate some jargon for the n00bz ... It'd look amateur without it, like a map without a color key, you know?
around here: xda-developers.com, one website and, really, only a little section of it.
froyo: three versions ago in the operating system of topic
jerking around wanting what's not there: asking for current software (...the nerve!!)
sammy: Samsung Electronics Co., or its $220bn parent company Samsung Group (total 2010 revenue)
dangling gb: Samsung's apparent plans to produce, release, and support Android v.2.3, Gingerbread ("gb")
cappy: Samsung Captivate, released July 2010 in U.S.
"froyo ... miles beyond the infuse" : Unintelligible
Okay, I hope I did a good job. Now, if the n00bz keep asking questions, we can do them the service of making our language transparent! Why they won't just get it is astounding... I mean, who would ask questions about new software, anyway?? Just blows my mind... and who could make the mistake of thinking there might be a straight answer about something promising, that is, the new practical features of Ice Cream Sandwich (Android v.4) on a forum dweller's tongue is just plain offensive! Enduring such ignorance is hard, but I suppose it's a must. Live & let live... keep up the tolerance, fellow Infusers.
point taken I guess. what is annoying is the xda moderators have 2 search engines. on is xda wide Google assisted and the other is forum/thread based, not only that but when you create a new thread it suggests threads on similar topics you should read before posting the thread right in your face. yet this will not be the last ics request or "is it available" thread... but I wasn't gonna go there.
as far as ics. it needs a really talented dev to find ways to interface the proprietary stuff from gb to ics. even if we got a bootable version it would possibly be months before it was usable as more than a music player. the galaxy s is very lucky to have a number of talented devs and a closer relationship to the nexus s. even though the rom end could be taken from the galaxy s the kernel would be a big undertaking due to different GPS, Bluetooth, radio, screen, and other componants.
Hm .. lots to think about, there .
Holding these abandoned devices in your hand makes you pine daily for updates on developers' progress toward what would appear to be inevitable. If it isn't, it is a commercial atrocity
By "interface," there, do you mean device emulation or rewritten device drivers? i'm attempting to assess the nature of the challenge, less so its magnitude. i do appreciate both this and the frustration with lazy users.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-WANGERNUMB
physivic said:
Hm .. lots to think about, there .
Holding these abandoned devices in your hand makes you pine daily for updates on developers' progress toward what would appear to be inevitable. If it isn't, it is a commercial atrocity
By "interface," there, do you mean device emulation or rewritten device drivers? i'm attempting to assess the nature of the challenge, less so its magnitude. i do appreciate both this and the frustration with lazy users.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-WANGERNUMB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it could be emulation or I guess some kind of wrapper. like how Linux can use windows wifi drivers on a PC. driver rewrites need source code and/or documentation I would think.
I don't know the technical details but I know entropy has brought up things that have changed that may be hard to port. maybe if the cm9 team actually had an infuse. they have some real talent but the problem is getting it in the hands of an interested member of the team.
we lucked out with Linux bozo but I don't think its typical for a device to get a cm port without the cm team having involvement if the kernel is unique. on many older HTC phones kernels are somewhat cross compatible so those phones are a little more able to share development.
who releases kernels
! Who is responsible for developing/releasing kernels ???
For ics, no one
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
jimjcollins said:
For ifs, no one
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If someone could come to us, then it would be great. I was thinking maybe we could get DA_G to come over, except idk if he would want to deal with such hard hardware. And to people saying cm9, we do not necissarily need that. Any kind of aosp would be nice.
Ryanscool said:
If someone could come to us, then it would be great. I was thinking maybe we could get DA_G to come over, except idk if he would want to deal with such hard hardware. And to people saying cm9, we do not necissarily need that. Any kind of aosp would be nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but come on really, I mess around with what others build and I have also have a sky, I don't submit my stuff because frankly half the time it sucks, and I don't have the time to mess with bugs, I've been building rom since windows 5.1 and I can tell you that ics would suck on this phone, not enough ram, yes you can do it but, it would suck
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Zeus 6 with ics revamped theme, or are you looking for legit ics?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
jimjcollins said:
I know but come on really, I mess around with what others build and I have also have a sky, I don't submit my stuff because frankly half the time it sucks, and I don't have the time to mess with bugs, I've been building rom since windows 5.1 and I can tell you that ics would suck on this phone, not enough ram, yes you can do it but, it would suck
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1432100 proof it can be done... and it looks nice haha.
I know it can, but it seems pointless, but I guess we are here to test, so I was wrong in my comment
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
OK for all you haters. http://developer.nvidia.com/tegra-resources
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Score!!!! F you LG we don't need you anymore.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
You should do a search before posting. That is not source for our device.
That's a start, can't help but knock people down. Yeah, I know it's O2x dumb ass.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
No, it's not O2X either, so knock off the attitude.
That is the development page for the reference Tegra 250 kit, and it's been around for a long time.
The O2X/G2X use the Tegra 250 AP20H. Nvidia has already stated that it's up to LG to release code specific to our phones.
I was saying you should search because that link has been posted tons of times.
mustangtim49 said:
That's a start, can't help but knock people down. Yeah, I know it's O2x dumb ass.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please know what you're talking about before trying to insult people.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I'll admit u got me.... these type of posts need to stop, get hopes up.
NVIDIA NEVER AGAIN!
This looks legit, it was posted a couple days ago, read this:
http://developer.nvidia.com/content/android-40-ics-os-images-tegra-android-available
It includes this:
"Tegra Android Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) OS Image for Ventana"
The Tegra 2 "Ventana" development kit is targeted at developers creating software for Android 2.2 "Froyo" and above.
Hence, the "Tegra" it is talking about is Tegra 2
loganmc10 said:
This looks legit, it was posted a couple days ago, read this:
http://developer.nvidia.com/content/android-40-ics-os-images-tegra-android-available
It includes this:
"Tegra Android Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) OS Image for Ventana"
The Tegra 2 "Ventana" development kit is targeted at developers creating software for Android 2.2 "Froyo" and above.
Hence, the "Tegra" it is talking about is Tegra 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Ventana is what's used primarily in Tablets. We have "Harmony."
I don't see why you guys are getting mad? It was a simple mistake. No need to bash on this guy for trying to help.
FatalityBoyZahy said:
I don't see why you guys are getting mad? It was a simple mistake. No need to bash on this guy for trying to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't bashing him and neither was anyone else. He (the op)called a guy a dumb ass because he told him its not the right driver lol.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Cmon devs!
Sent from my G2X
This thread is funny.....rookies never learn
fcisco13 said:
I'll admit u got me.... these type of posts need to stop, get hopes up.
NVIDIA NEVER AGAIN!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed 100%
FatalityBoyZahy said:
I don't see why you guys are getting mad? It was a simple mistake. No need to bash on this guy for trying to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I mean realistically I'm sure the devs will be the first to know when source or drivers get released, but but don't squash a guy for being enthusiastic and trying to be helpful.
First, I would like to apologize for lowering to a level I have tried to remove from these forums. I have been in this game quite awhile and I've learned one thing for sure, being polite and helpful get the best results. I come originally from the lowly Huawei ascend and I'll tell you, that phone has a great community and still sees support and it hit eol more than 6 months ago. We as a group decided our own fate when WE pushed our devs to lock our ICS thread. This is our device and our forums and we are responsible for building a sense of community. As it is now, I cringe to check my own threads because I know they will be bloodgened with haters and "you're wrong, I'm right ". We should all try to encourage one another and promote how awesome our device is, which brings me to this... Why use these forums to bash the g2x? All the complaining and whining is why t-Mobile bailed out. I am a collision tech for highline vehicles, do you have any idea how much service a Ferrari requires to keep it running? I seriously doubt Enzo Ferrari endured customers calling to tell him what a pos his cars are(I know he's dead) Lastly, I happen to be a successful writer for another website, I happen to be a weath of knowledge with a lot of connections. I have been been working my butt off to help a certain group of devs get a certain app working on our device, all I'll say is those of us that are flashing addicts will appreciate this app. I get things done through kindness and support. I would love to see that sense of community here, lets face it, we ALL use these forums. Thank you so much all devs that have stuck it out with us, our device would be worthless without you, sincerely, artifintel.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
He called him a.......dumb ass? Gulp! I swear its a bunch of children on here. I know most of us get called worse than that on a daily basis.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
mustangtim49 said:
First, I would like to apologize for lowering to a level I have tried to remove from these forums. I have been in this game quite awhile and I've learned one thing for sure, being polite and helpful get the best results. I come originally from the lowly Huawei ascend and I'll tell you, that phone has a great community and still sees support and it hit eol more than 6 months ago. We as a group decided our own fate when WE pushed our devs to lock our ICS thread. This is our device and our forums and we are responsible for building a sense of community. As it is now, I cringe to check my own threads because I know they will be bloodgened with haters and "you're wrong, I'm right ". We should all try to encourage one another and promote how awesome our device is, which brings me to this... Why use these forums to bash the g2x? All the complaining and whining is why t-Mobile bailed out. I am a collision tech for highline vehicles, do you have any idea how much service a Ferrari requires to keep it running? I seriously doubt Enzo Ferrari endured customers calling to tell him what a pos his cars are(I know he's dead) Lastly, I happen to be a successful writer for another website, I happen to be a weath of knowledge with a lot of connections. I have been been working my butt off to help a certain group of devs get a certain app working on our device, all I'll say is those of us that are flashing addicts will appreciate this app. I get things done through kindness and support. I would love to see that sense of community here, lets face it, we ALL use these forums. Thank you so much all devs that have stuck it out with us, our device would be worthless without you, sincerely, artifintel.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
qft. The saddest part is that some people will never learn.
BTW: Good luck
Thanks! I'm scheduled to do an article on the app, hopefully they will have it working soon.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
mustangtim49 said:
First, I would like to apologize for lowering to a level I have tried to remove from these forums. I have been in this game quite awhile and I've learned one thing for sure, being polite and helpful get the best results. I come originally from the lowly Huawei ascend and I'll tell you, that phone has a great community and still sees support and it hit eol more than 6 months ago. We as a group decided our own fate when WE pushed our devs to lock our ICS thread. This is our device and our forums and we are responsible for building a sense of community. As it is now, I cringe to check my own threads because I know they will be bloodgened with haters and "you're wrong, I'm right ". We should all try to encourage on
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very well said. Although I don't think the "you're wrong I'm right" has a lot to do with the problem. I think the problem goes a little deeper then that.
I feel the problem lies more upon the greed of many users who for some reason think devs/themers owe them something. Developers and themers do this because we like to in our own freetime. We like seeing the page views, downloads, thanks, and constructive criticism that push us to go a step further.
I will give an example of how many of us that make releases look at things. And use my personal releases as reference.
My precision theme for all devices I own and some I don't own has about 6k downloads. Precision for cm7 has about 900. Icecreamcomb has a little over 3k. Weapon new clip has about 400. And a few thousand for all my wallpapers, boot animations, and other images I have created. So apparently a lot of people use my work which is what I hope for upon releasing, seeing as I want people to enjoy it as much as I do.
Look at my thanks meter. I have 210 thanks. So that tells me that out of the 10k+ people using my work only 210 (2%?) where grateful enough to take the liberty to click a button and show appreciation for my hours and hours of hard work. But hey that's fine at least some people do appreciate it and many more use it.
However there are always those that do nothing but troll and complain that drives everyone away. It is sad when it gets to the point that people stop developing for a device because of users. I find it quite astounding the nerve of some people.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Party on Wayne, party on Garth!
*Sarcastic Idiotic Voice* WHY IS THAR NO WIFI CALLING! Ur gettin' repurt!
*Back to serious poker faces* Glad to see Jelly Bean have a preview on our device. Oh btw Erik you haven't answered my question yet, would you like a Google Play gift card?
th3controller said:
*Sarcastic Idiotic Voice* WHY IS THAR NO WIFI CALLING! Ur gettin' repurt!
*Back to serious poker faces* Glad to see Jelly Bean have a preview on our device. Oh btw Erik you haven't answered my question yet, would you like a Google Play gift card?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol nah just rape n abuse the thanks button
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
erikmm said:
Lol nah just rape n abuse the thanks button
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find that offensive and I may need to report you. I was a thanks button in a previous life.
Guess who polished an Op post!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=35370542&postcount=11
So much softer to read
I'll talk to you on irc later today to see if i can find a fix for sound
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Got source?
airfluip1 said:
Got source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not yet I'm hoping this weekend after finals :/
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda premium
Yeah, I'd be able to find a sound fix if I did.
How's the battery life compared to ics? I'm guessing its around the same because it has nearly the same kernel
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app
Better on the battery, since wifi doesn't work.
Once wifi gets fixed, it should be about the same again.
Just a side note installing an ICS KERNEL like hefe will earn you a boot loop, so don't unless you like that sort of thing.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app
airfluip1 said:
Got source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
erikmm said:
Not yet I'm hoping this weekend after finals :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bot42 said:
Just a side note installing an ICS KERNEL like hefe will earn you a boot loop, so don't unless you like that sort of thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As soon as erik gets the source posted somewhere, it will receive some teamacid luv.
It's funny, because I started looking at a herring port last weekend, and then saw the dev thread erik started and stopped.
i am somewhat sure that I may be able to fix sound issues.
erikmm said:
Not yet I'm hoping this weekend after finals :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bhundven said:
As soon as erik gets the source posted somewhere, it will receive some teamacid luv.
It's funny, because I started looking at a herring port last weekend, and then saw the dev thread erik started and stopped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its funny I remember the last time source code was not posted when promised devs got upset and there was a huge dog-pile.
Per the rules here at xda source code should be posted. When can links be expected? .
By posting your work on XDA-Developers, you are agreeing that it complies with relevant licensing conditions. As such, by posting a kernel or other work containing GPL code, you are confirming to us that you have made this source code available publicly under the GPL, and should highlight this in your thread with a link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
eollie said:
Its funny I remember the last time source code was not posted when promised devs got upset and there was a huge dog-pile.
Per the rules here at xda source code should be posted. When can links be expected? .
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's no secret you have a beef with Erik, but really, going to try and call out "no source link", for an alpha build, when he's said he will get source for everyone to work with. If you are going to be that much of a stickler, then you better go through the ROM thread and find EVERY ROM that doesn't have a source link in the thread.
Seriously, go through every single ROM and post in that thread your little XDA link and quote, because otherwise it's shows your being petty against Erik and you're mad because the mod's keep deleting your posts or closing threads every time you start something. I just looked and saw 10 ROM's without source linked without even looking at Erik's releases, so go report all them too and post your quote.
He is not referring to ROM'S and ports, rather the kernel and CM10. er1kmm is NOT keeping it from people for malicious reasons. To imply otherwise is childish.You don't see ANYONE from TFQ releasing ANYTHING CM10. Please stop asking for ETA's. Grow up and stop whining.
Sent from a hole in the time/space continuum.
Actually this is something that is suppose to be released when the thread is started. So this eta is a valid one. It would be nice to have this code available so other people can look to see if they can fix stuff. I dont care when I beta release is made, I just care to see the source code posted. That is not a unreasonable request. This is a pretty major release and I know others are chomping at the bit to get it to start trying to fix some things.
eollie said:
Actually this is something that is suppose to be released when the thread is started. So this eta is a valid one. It would be nice to have this code available so other people can look to see if they can fix stuff. I dont care when I beta release is made, I just care to see the source code posted. That is not a unreasonable request. This is a pretty major release and I know others are chomping at the bit to get it to start trying to fix some things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, just maybe, there is something going on in er1kmm's personal life. I honestly don't know. Real life comes before XDA. Be yourself, report it, have any and all threads regarding CM10 deleted (including bhundven's which has been proven false, and his is now an "any other thread").
Edit: Not false, just no longer relevant.
I am not defending or going against anyone here, but the reason that I am asking for source is because I feel that once we have source, we will be able to fix a ton of issues. The more devs/helpers, the better.
And I am quite sure, since erik has promised us source, it'll be here soon enough.