Google has acquired Motorola. - General Topics

This is pretty recent but the CEO of Google announced they've acquired Motorola: http://www.businessinsider.com/breaking-google-buying-motorola-mobility-for-125-billion-2011-8
This should be good.
DANGIT NINJA'D. Deprecate this.

I had heard about Moto's plans to sue google over Android, and am pleased.
Google's official release:-
http://investor.google.com/releases/2011/0815.html

genieass said:
I had heard about Moto's plans to sue google over Android, and am pleased.
Google's official release:-
http://investor.google.com/releases/2011/0815.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
moto wants to sue android
google's answer - buy them out.
I believe google is now a patent troll...

domineus said:
moto wants to sue android
google's answer - buy them out.
I believe google is now a patent troll...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where does this whole Moto-wanted-to-sue-Google come from?

I guess the next nexus after prime is going to be Motos from now on.
Sent from my HTC Shooter aka 3VO

Yep, nice patent portfolio. Now they just need to work out which ones Apple are infringing!

lqaddict said:
Where does this whole Moto-wanted-to-sue-Google come from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Think it is in reference to Motorola to collect IP royalties from other Android Makers
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1213724

lqaddict said:
Where does this whole Moto-wanted-to-sue-Google come from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=motorola+suing+android+IP
first four links
or...
http://www.developerfusion.com/news/124087/motorola-to-sue-own-kind-take-on-android-partners/
its been all over tech blogs for the past few days. Google then purchases motorola?
It seems very ostentatious considering Motorola was considering using other OSes not named android and even making their own OS. Collecting all information about Motorola and Google, I think an inferred plan was to slowly transition away from Google Android for more profit. And I repeat, Google buys Motorola. Yeah...This isn't a sign of dominance from google or anything...

Woohoo!!!!!!!! is what I can say to this. Now Google has the means to fight back.
Other manufacturers, HTC, Sony and LG are happy too: http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/15/google-acquiring-motorola-mobility/
Yes!!!!
domineus said:
I believe google is now a patent troll...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Err, what??

domineus said:
moto wants to sue android
google's answer - buy them out.
I believe google is now a patent troll...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, of course. A tried-and-true method used by Microsoft and others since patents began.
There's another possibility. Instead of charging for the patents they own, Google could strengthen Android's market position even further by offering free usage rights to HTC,Samsung and others if they use Google-approved versions of vanilla Android. That way they can have some control of the (so called) "fragmentation problem" caused in part by Sense, Motoblur and similar overlays without making Android more closed than it already is. The carrot-and-stick approach. Use vanilla Android, we won't charge patent fees.
But my gut feeling is it's maybe ultimately more about hardware and being able to dictate exactly what hardware runs basic Android OS on Google-branded phones, a-la Apple with the iPhone and iOS. Google is not so stupid they haven't noticed the piles of money Apple is making on hardware sales.

domineus said:
moto wants to sue android
google's answer - buy them out.
I believe google is now a patent troll...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You clearly don't have a clue what a patent troll actually is.

domineus said:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=motorola+suing+android+IP
first four links
or...
http://www.developerfusion.com/news/124087/motorola-to-sue-own-kind-take-on-android-partners/
its been all over tech blogs for the past few days. Google then purchases motorola?
It seems very ostentatious considering Motorola was considering using other OSes not named android and even making their own OS. Collecting all information about Motorola and Google, I think an inferred plan was to slowly transition away from Google Android for more profit. And I repeat, Google buys Motorola. Yeah...This isn't a sign of dominance from google or anything...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I failed to see a connection b/w Motorola suing other handset manufacturers and Motorola suing Google.

lqaddict said:
I failed to see a connection b/w Motorola suing other handset manufacturers and Motorola suing Google.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also said Motorola wanted to SUE ANDROID not other handset manufacturers...
no connection, Jha openly stated that was the course
You clearly don't have a clue what a patent troll actually is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really
http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/201...e-v-bing-slap-fight-explained-piece-by-piece/
when google assumed Microsoft was using their service, they were up in arms ready to sue microsoft and sue any other company that thought they were using their IP. They purchase MM for defense, even though MM wanted to sue google...in a veil attempt to countersue Apple and Microsoft...
patent troll
Patent troll is a pejorative term used for a person or company that enforces its patents against one or more alleged infringers in a manner considered unduly aggressive or opportunistic, often with no intention to manufacture or market the patented invention
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, sounds awful familiar. Google continues the same trolling microsoft and apple has done.
savior of humanity
right
Does it give google some fight? Sure. Much fight? Not really. MM still has suits from Microsoft and Apple to contend with. And if anything from the past weeks have shown, Google isn't really good at PR, nor are they good at defense...
Am I intrigued? Sure. But hey it goes to show google is a company like microsoft

domineus said:
I also said Motorola wanted to SUE ANDROID not other handset manufacturers...
no connection, Jha openly stated that was the course
Really
http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/201...e-v-bing-slap-fight-explained-piece-by-piece/
when google assumed Microsoft was using their service, they were up in arms ready to sue microsoft and sue any other company that thought they were using their IP. They purchase MM for defense, even though MM wanted to sue google...in a veil attempt to countersue Apple and Microsoft...
Hm, sounds awful familiar. Google continues the same trolling microsoft and apple has done.
savior of humanity
right
Does it give google some fight? Sure. Much fight? Not really. MM still has suits from Microsoft and Apple to contend with. And if anything from the past weeks have shown, Google isn't really good at PR, nor are they good at defense...
Am I intrigued? Sure. But hey it goes to show google is a company like microsoft
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, you have some reading comprehension issues - Android is a registered trademark of Google, Inc., nowhere Moto claimed to sue Android.

I'm 10000% sure they didn't come up with this deal over night, or in the last couple of weeks.
So this whole suing stuff has been BS.

this seems out of character for google. Don't they usually just buy software companies?

Quick note.... Google is purchasing Motorola Mobility, not all of Motorola. I don't thing Google wants to have/sell the hardware for cable boxes , motherboards (MSI) and other components? Or do they?

As far as Google being a patent troll -- only if they start going out and frivolously trying to sue the competition into the ground.
The fact of the matter is, and Google has admitted this, that even if you don't LIKE the game, you have to PLAY the game, or you get sued back to the stone age. That's the facts. If we want Android phones, then Google has to have a strong patent portfolio, frivolous or no.

Clarification is in order here. Google has announced that they will acquire Motorola. The deal has not gone through yet, and AFAIK it has to be approved by the US Government, EU and anywhere else they both do business. I expect that the EU will take the longest since they're way more thorough when it comes to privacy and anti-trust issues.
We all know there isn't any, but that doesn't mean they will skip the due-diligence on this.

domineus said:
Really
http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/201...e-v-bing-slap-fight-explained-piece-by-piece/
when google assumed Microsoft was using their service, they were up in arms ready to sue microsoft and sue any other company that thought they were using their IP. They purchase MM for defense, even though MM wanted to sue google...in a veil attempt to countersue Apple and Microsoft...
Hm, sounds awful familiar. Google continues the same trolling microsoft and apple has done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, really. Buying a company that was intending to sue them is not being a patent troll. A patent troll is a person/company who patents a concept and then never does anything with it until some other person/company does, then sues them. It's also been defined as a person/company who sues others based on frivolous use of vaguely similar concepts.
Show me where Google is suing anyone for this. If you can't, they're not patent trolls and you fail at reading.
All they've done here is take up a defensive position to protect themselves from lawsuits, and will most likely use the patents they've acquired to work out a cross-licensing deal with Microsoft & Apple to get rid of all of this stupid patent suing garbage.

Related

Google lost fight for patents of Nortel

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/07...eat-google-for-nortel-patents/?ref=technology
Big problems for Android coming?
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA Premium App
It's funny how far off their bid was...
Why would that make a difference? They didn't have the patents before the sale so nothing really changed.
Just so you guys know, this stuff happens all the time. Google was putting in weird bids and one of them was even for the number for pi. 3.14...billion. Theory has it that Google didn't really want the patents but wanted the price driven up some. They've done it before. If i can find the link to the article i'll post it for you but in essence this is no big deal.
I take all of this with a grain of salt. Google is an extremely smart and innovative company. They knew they didn't need to receive those patents, or they could have outbid. I agree, it was more of a process to draw the bid higher, that's all.
Sent from my DROID2 using XDA App
Actually, now that i've read other sources Google does say they were disappointed. Geez they were outbid by a conglomerate of Apple, RIM, Sony, and Microsoft. Yeah, that's fair. Still doesn't seem like a crushing blow according to most articles. Just an inconvenience.
$4.5b for the Nortel patents is overpriced when Google can just buy RIM for $15b.
Means that Android Manufacturers play more royalties per device than people who are part of the consortium or who already have a license. It will affect the race to the bottom, where cheaper Android devices will have a higher Build of Materials costs due to higher licensing costs vs other OS's who have this pegged in.
For OS Vendors, it's a strategic armoury for patent disputes. For Manufacturers its all about the build cost.
bleach168 said:
$4.5b for the Nortel patents is overpriced when Google can just buy RIM for $15b.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to see Google buy Apple and MS as well as RIM and Sony. That would be a hoot. Google is the only company of them all that has a humanity-driven business model. If Google were ever to fold, I guarantee the world would turn dark.
I have hope Google has tricks up its sleeves to get past this business with Apple. The Nortel stuff I think is inconsequencial. But I hope Google can come out on the top side of this. Google certainly has skillful and genius programmers and devs so I see them coming up with alternatives to any roadblocks brought on by infringed patents or loss of patents.
I wuv google <3
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897
Lets wait and watch.
Google wanted Nortel's patents because their own patent portfolio is quite small. When you get sued by companies like Apple and Microsoft, it is VERY GOOD to have a strong patent portfolio. It gives you a position of strength in the license negotiations.
Losing the Nortel's patents may mean that Google has to take patent licenses from folks like Apple and Microsoft.

HTC infringes 2 Apple patents, could see all Android devices banned

Specifically, the judge found that HTC infringes patents 5,946,647 and 6,343,263. The first relates to receiving information that can then be used by a single interaction from the user, e.g. receiving a phone number, automatically highlighting it, and tapping the screen to call. The second relates to the processing of real-time data on a handset.
The issue this causes is much bigger than just impacting sales of HTC device as the patents relate to Android, not just HTC hardware. If the ruling stands, then Apple could quite rightly go after every manufacturer that uses Android, be it a smartphone or a tablet, and demand their device be banned from sale in the U.S. In effect, Apple would stop Android in its tracks and remove its biggest competitor from the field of play.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile...ould-see-all-android-devices-banned-20110716/
great, american consumers will be stuck with smuggled android devices.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA App
Will Apple get the ban hammer someday?
Apple has lost the race to android so now they are suing every android maker
...
cdesai said:
Apple has lost the race to android so now they are suing every android maker
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely. It's funny that they have the nerve to do this, when many "new" features of iOS5 are clear rip-offs of Android features.
£q
Ginosaji said:
Most of these patents are a blatant exploit of the system. I wouldn't be surprised if most, if not all of them are thrown out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed these patents have only a few years left in them, yet for the first one loads of phones and computer programs have incorporated text recognition and processing, yet I don't recall Apple getting uppety about it.
technology will be slow if all patent not colaborate
mr.hary said:
technology will be slow if all patent not colaborate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only in America, for Americans. The rest of the world doesn't have this problem with idiot patents grabbing "ownership" of massively vague concepts. It's not really a problem for the rest of us, America is just a small corner of the worldwide market.
great,,,,,,,,,...
MAD I tell you!
If Apple were to get Android banned, I would imagine Google will fight back by removing all their apps from iOS.
There goes Google maps, youtube, and gmail.
We would live in the smartphone dark ages.
bleach168 said:
MAD I tell you!
If Apple were to get Android banned, I would imagine Google will fight back by removing all their apps from iOS.
There goes Google maps, youtube, and gmail.
We would live in the smartphone dark ages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see that happening. If anything, Apple will license their products to Google for a fee or Google will pay royalties. That is if anything comes of it.
Apple is pushing too hard.
These are normal things, which everyone uses, has used and will use. All droid companies gotta do is bring up a small update for the call thing and then smear it in apple's face, idk about second one though.
This is no way near to banning androids all over usa, indeed apple just changes a few things, while using android stuff.
They have been holding out on new iphone, probably cause of this patent thing.
Android made it through the multi touch patent, this should be a piece of cake.
hateem said:
Apple is pushing too hard.
These are normal things, which everyone uses, has used and will use. All droid companies gotta do is bring up a small update for the call thing and then smear it in apple's face, idk about second one though.
This is no way near to banning androids all over usa, indeed apple just changes a few things, while using android stuff.
They have been holding out on new iphone, probably cause of this patent thing.
Android made it through the multi touch patent, this should be a piece of cake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There hasn't been anything done by Apple on the multi-touch capacitive mobile display tech yet. Apple was just awarded the patent last month. In all likelihood Apple will wait to see what happens with all of its current litigation before determining what to do with its nuclear bomb.
Apple will never be able to put a finger on with the current models. Probably a royalty.
I was under the misinformation that apple got the patent a year ago.
'Apple was just awarded the patent last month.'
I am sure there is a law that stops patented technology from going forward against the technology which is present at that time
Actually doesn't iOS already steal Android's notification system? Hahahaha...
popular products never actually get banned from sale. What actually happens is that the parties agree to a match of chess after they get bored of the court, and the lower pays the winner a random amount of money.
hateem said:
Apple will never be able to put a finger on with the current models. Probably a royalty.
I was under the misinformation that apple got the patent a year ago.
I am sure there is a law that stops patented technology from going forward against the technology which is present at that time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apple applied for the patent around the time the first iPhone came out, about 3 years ago. The government just now found time to award it to them. I guess it took the government 3 years to study its validity.
I think Apple just wants some money - royalties - from HTC (or Samsung... or any other manufacturer).
There would be a big backlash against Apple if they were able to ban any android devices from the United States.
It's all about the money.
FloatingFatMan said:
Only in America, for Americans. The rest of the world doesn't have this problem with idiot patents grabbing "ownership" of massively vague concepts. It's not really a problem for the rest of us, America is just a small corner of the worldwide market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I love my dear Brazil... ahh soooo great! haha

It's on now! - Google is pissed

Looks like Google is ready to take it to 'em. And this is correctly targeting *all* parties involved. Not just Apple. And I'm glad to see Google stand up and wallop. I hope Google balances out the situation because Google is the only real and true, "worthy" company among them all. Google stands for humanity. The others stand for profits at all costs. With Google here, the others are usable and enjoyable. Without Google here, the others are the ruination of the industry.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/03/google-slams-apple-and-microsoft-claims-hostile-organized-cam/
MartyLK said:
Google stands for humanity. The others stand for profits at all costs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh come on now, let's not get carried away. Google is a business as well. They care about making money. And they do it by collecting as much info about you as possible and then selling it to advertisers.
Now, I am against this patent BS and fully support Google in their effort to fight it. But lets not make Google into more than they are.
Praise Jesus they're getting involved!!
lol google is more powerful, and will eventually just be as evil as any of those other companies.
Google is becoming too much of a monoply. They're just very good at concealing their true intentions.
I don't like patents?
Yes, completely forget about the phrase "Don't Be Evil." True, they are not as evil as Apple, but they still have some shady stuff.
It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out. Google didn't come off looking too good after the whole Nortel thing by immediately going to the DOJ and blogging about how broken the patent system is(which it is). Android seems to be everyone's target these days
Ouch.
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/03/microsoft-just-kicked-google-in-the-nuts/
canadariot2312 said:
Ouch.
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/03/microsoft-just-kicked-google-in-the-nuts/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was just about to post the same, so Microsoft asked google if they wanted to bid with them and google said no and yet they blog that crap...
How exactly would Google bidding with MS help them? They need patents to defend themselves from MS, to establish a MAD situation. They can't do that with patents that are jointly owed by MS too.
And this all shows the BS-ness of patents. Where's the stuff about patents encouraging innovation and stuff? Nowhere. All I see is patents being bought as bargaining chips.
I mean, buying some patents and using them to sue is totally about someone copying what you invented, riiiiiiight. Because buying = inventing, sure.
I can only repeat: It's all BS.
Gusar321 said:
How exactly would Google bidding with MS help them? They need patents to defend themselves from MS, to establish a MAD situation. They can't do that with patents that are jointly owed by MS too.
And this all shows the BS-ness of patents. Where's the stuff about patents encouraging innovation and stuff? Nowhere. All I see is patents being bought as bargaining chips.
I mean, buying some patents and using them to sue is totally about someone copying what you invented, riiiiiiight. Because buying = inventing, sure.
I can only repeat: It's all BS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it works like this, you buy a patent with one of your competitors and then it can't be used against you by them.
It also saves you money as the cost is shared and there is one less bidder at the auction to ramp the price up trying to out bid you.
Sure, you then can't use it to make a deal with MS to infringe some of their patents for free, but if you don't win the bid, you can't do that anyway, and they can use it against you.
Tone_ said:
Was just about to post the same, so Microsoft asked google if they wanted to bid with them and google said no and yet they blog that crap...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all together
1
2
3
FAIL GOOGLE =)
that is all
Monopolies are never a good thing. Whenever one company becomes too powerful and controls everything that goes on in your life it becomes a little frightening.
Gusar321 said:
How exactly would Google bidding with MS help them? They need patents to defend themselves from MS, to establish a MAD situation. They can't do that with patents that are jointly owed by MS too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or they could suck up their pride, have patents along with Apple, Oracle, Microsoft, etc., have this cross-licensing patent deal and have less lawsuits. On the other hand, they can buy all the patents and use them for "defensive purposes."
I don't like the patent system either and I am pretty sure that Google won't fix it.
Booms! Plurals! Gets used to its!
xaccers said:
Well it works like this, you buy a patent with one of your competitors and then it can't be used against you by them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but there's tons of patents that aren't part of this particular portfolio. So all there would be is Google spending a lot of money while not being any safer from litigation.
canadariot2312 said:
Or they could suck up their pride
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does this have to do with pride? It's all about needing to amass a large portfolio of patents just so that when you're sued (and you *will* be sued, because it has become impossible to create *anything* without infringing), you have something to defend yourself.
Gusar321 said:
Oh come on now, let's not get carried away. Google is a business as well. They care about making money. And they do it by collecting as much info about you as possible and then selling it to advertisers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
their street view cars can read e-mail too, ya know, they have wifi-detection software in the antennas of those cars.
[/tin foil hat]
every company sells info, hate to break it to ya. and the conspiracy nuts fail to reealize those antennas are there so they can detect a wifi hotspot like a coffee shop or private network, and put into the maps software.
imagine if you are a traveling buisiness man with a laptop, and don't have a wireless tether on your phone, also if you are in a dead zone (serious, all verizon customers, go to mound city, mo, just TRY to use your data there, you will be lucky if you get 1x, must have somthing to do with the bluff)
Google's biggest problem right now is Apple, especially with the recently ruling Apple got against HTC <I would post link if I could but I'm not allowed yet>. So it would have been beneficial for them to jointly own them with Microsoft, for a couple reasons. First being Apple isn't going to go after Microsoft, their patent portfolio is too big. But more importantly it gives Google more defense against Apple which is really what they need right now. I believe I read somewhere that Google only has about 1000 patents related to the wireless and I'm sure Apple has ton more.
I do agree the whole patent system is rediculous for software but unfortunately it is what it is for now.
termleech said:
Google's biggest problem right now is Apple, especially with the recently ruling Apple got against HTC <I would post link if I could but I'm not allowed yet>. So it would have been beneficial for them to jointly own them with Microsoft, for a couple reasons. First being Apple isn't going to go after Microsoft, their patent portfolio is too big. But more importantly it gives Google more defense against Apple which is really what they need right now. I believe I read somewhere that Google only has about 1000 patents related to the wireless and I'm sure Apple has ton more.
I do agree the whole patent system is rediculous for software but unfortunately it is what it is for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, technicly google got into the mobile market back in 2003 when they purchased then start-up company Android Inc.
and people forget that the iPhone wasn't the first capacitive touch screen phone
anyone remember the LG Prada? (yes it was a feature phone but the point is that it was a touch screen phone, the first of it's kind)
****, let's go EARLIER then that, the IBM Simon, wasn't really a "cell phone" maybe bag phone, but it had a resistive touch screen.
"We have a mantra: don't be evil, which is to do the best things we know how for our users, for our customers, for everyone. So I think if we were known for that, it would be a wonderful thing." - Larry Page
I totally want to have Google's babies!
When I say Google is for humanity, I'm speaking in relation to their sphere of involvement, not a "Christ" or anything weird like that. Google cares about benefiting humanity with convenience and comfort. Example: If Google knew of a perpetual free energy source, they would reveal it to the public. The others might be inclined to keep it secret from the public because of deals or influence from battery makers or oil companies. Google would laugh at an oil company who wanted them to keep free energy from the public.
If Google discovered alien life, they wouldn't be inclined to keep it from the public in order to keep church safe. They would reveal any and every information that can potentially free humanity from tyranny. NASA would oblige the government for the sake of religious lobbyists in Washington to keep it secret so humanity can remain under control of the church that much longer.
Sure, Google is a business. Google is made up of people who have the same needs everyone else does and need to make a living. That doesn't mean they have to conduct their business like the "good 'ol boys" do. If Google fails, humanity will remain in darkness that much longer until another entity comes along and rocks the system.

Apple Says Android Oem's are abusing the patient system

Check the link below what do you think funny or what me=FUNNY
http://www.dailytech.com/Apple+Cries+About+Samsung+and+Motorolas+Patent+Monopoly/article22586.htm
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
Apple is the one who is abusing the patent laws
BlackRose 22 said:
Check the link below what do you think funny or what me=FUNNY
http://www.dailytech.com/Apple+Cries+About+Samsung+and+Motorolas+Patent+Monopoly/article22586.htm
LG O1 Running Cm7 Mik_OS 2.35
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do know they all are abusing my patient system...
Nice find. The I love that article. The main reason I will never buy apple. Their products are decent, not my taste but decent. Even if they came out with a great phone I would be hard pressed to put my money on a company like this.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Someone needs to put a patent on customers, that way they can sue when someone else steals them
Oh look, another biased tech site. Apple isn't abusing the patent system, they're utilizing it for its intendd purpose. There is a big difference. The fact that google steals everything is, and should be their downfall. People treat it as though they're innovating and yet everything they build and everything they utilize is stolen, to top it off the whole point of their platform is to steal your information.
z33dev33l said:
Oh look, another biased tech site. Apple isn't abusing the patent system, they're utilizing it for its intendd purpose. There is a big difference. The fact that google steals everything is, and should be their downfall. People treat it as though they're innovating and yet everything they build and everything they utilize is stolen, to top it off the whole point of their platform is to steal your information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right apple would never steal ideas.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
z33dev33l said:
Oh look, another biased tech site. Apple isn't abusing the patent system, they're utilizing it for its intendd purpose. There is a big difference. The fact that google steals everything is, and should be their downfall. People treat it as though they're innovating and yet everything they build and everything they utilize is stolen, to top it off the whole point of their platform is to steal your information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The attention whore is back! You want to talk about stealing?? Youtube search Steve Jobs on stealing. He says word for word, "Good artists copy, but great artists steal." Youre just a biased android hater. Jobs said himself that stealing is a good tactic so obviously Apple has done a lot of that.
Sent from my HTC Desire Z
This is the same Apple that has initiated a patent war with its smartphone rivals. And it's the same rival that has tried to remove competing products from the market, rather than agree to negotiate a licensing fee. And it's the same company that patented multi-touch gestures 26 years after they were invented at a research university. And it's the same company that allegedly doctored evidence in European courts to support its lawsuits against Android. And yet this company claims android-based smartphone manufacturers are abusing the patent system.
Yes, it does seem like Android has been abusing Apple's patience
slapshot30 said:
The attention whore is back! You want to talk about stealing?? Youtube search Steve Jobs on stealing. He says word for word, "Good artists copy, but great artists steal." Youre just a biased android hater. Jobs said himself that stealing is a good tactic so obviously Apple has done a lot of that.
Sent from my HTC Desire Z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and again you put forth senseless insults, shocker. I'm not, nor could I ever say that apple doesn't steal, however, they also innovate. Google has failed to do this and makes it their business to steal from different hardware/software providers, and even their consumers. Google is a company founded on stealing and you all act as though you're offended by someone mentioning it.
z33dev33l said:
and again you put forth senseless insults, shocker. I'm not, nor could I ever say that apple doesn't steal, however, they also innovate. Google has failed to do this and makes it their business to steal from different hardware/software providers, and even their consumers. Google is a company founded on stealing and you all act as though you're offended by someone mentioning it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all Google only provides the software HTC, Samsung and other companies provide the hardware. Secondly Google android looks nothing at all like iPhone ui. IPhone is plain where as Google has customization with Widgets notifications and an open source market. Google android is so good that apple decided to implement it into there phones through ios 5, so I wouldn't be talking if I were you.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
ameedi600 said:
First of all Google only provides the software HTC, Samsung and other companies provide the hardware. Secondly Google android looks nothing at all like iPhone ui. IPhone is plain where as Google has customization with Widgets notifications and an open source market. Google android is so good that apple decided to implement it into there phones through ios 5, so I wouldn't be talking if I were you.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fully aware that googlr only provides the software, the software is what is used to steal everything. You CAN customize android to look however but by default its the same boring 4x4 slab of icons and that's how your average consumer will keep it. Android looked like blackberry OS until they saw the iPhone. Android has an open source market which has made it the 2nd biggest target for malware, it is expected that almost 1/3 of android users will encounter malware on their phone within the year. The most common varieties of this malware end up adding a hefty sum to your bill, these can be found on the "open source marketplace" that you're so proud of. As for your last statement saying apple is implementing android into iOS5 the only thing they've got that was stolen was the notifications bar. I'm no apple fan, but I feel justified in calling you an idiot.
Man everything that you mention makes you sound like an apple fan. Just get the hell out of here because no one likes a whiner who *****es about Google and says he's no apple fan. If you don't like Google so much then don't use any of their products as well as their search engine. No one cares what you think and I don't care what people think of my opinions. I'm not going to keep whining about it.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Funny once apple sues samsung its all ok , block their sales all good , but once apple gets hit back with same meassure then everyone else is abusing pattents.
Lets face it apple wants to put a stop on so fast and developing android phones and software, all they can is try to find loopholes and sue.
We will see where apple will be in 2 yr time and where android will be.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
If it wasnt for these android oem's apples hardware specs would still remain mediocre. U can bet iphone 5 would have been iphone 4 repackaged with same hardware specs.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
z33dev33l said:
and again you put forth senseless insults, shocker. I'm not, nor could I ever say that apple doesn't steal, however, they also innovate. Google has failed to do this and makes it their business to steal from different hardware/software providers, and even their consumers. Google is a company founded on stealing and you all act as though you're offended by someone mentioning it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hang on, in another thread your posts stated that Google do innovate (ok you were claiming that they didn't by arguing that they do innovate, but if crazy paradoxical logic is your thing, then go for it).
z33dev33l said:
Oh look, another biased tech site. Apple isn't abusing the patent system, they're utilizing it for its intendd purpose. There is a big difference. The fact that google steals everything is, and should be their downfall. People treat it as though they're innovating and yet everything they build and everything they utilize is stolen, to top it off the whole point of their platform is to steal your information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The RDF strikes again!
But this time I won't even bother with a rebuttal, it's useless anyway, in the next thread people will be spouting the same nonsense again and again.
It at least makes me a bit happy that most of the people in this thread do see it the way it *really* is - which is that Apple are being total and complete hypocrites.
I'll end with something I've asked in another thread, and of course didn't get a reply: How do you "steal" IP?
z33dev33l said:
and again you put forth senseless insults, shocker. I'm not, nor could I ever say that apple doesn't steal, however, they also innovate. Google has failed to do this and makes it their business to steal from different hardware/software providers, and even their consumers. Google is a company founded on stealing and you all act as though you're offended by someone mentioning it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apple does not innovate. They steal many ideas and clump them into one nicely built product. However, most tech companies do take other's ideas and build on them. Apple, HTC, Samsung all feed off of eachother. However, it is a problem when Apple decides they can steal but no one else can, and thus this stupid patent war.
z33dev33l said:
and again you put forth senseless insults, shocker. I'm not, nor could I ever say that apple doesn't steal, however, they also innovate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're on some serious hallucinogenic class a sh1t if you think Apple innovate anything.
100% everything they sell is not original and was done 10 years prior. They also specifcally leave out basic features just so retards buy the next product to get what should have been in the first.
The ONLY thing Apple are good at is their marketing, And that is convincing sheep like you that they bring things new to the table. Do some fking research dude.
Eye candy/marketed well yes, Something new/innovative absolutely not!

Its official - court rules that Motorolas patents cannot be used against Apple

http://fosspatents.blogspot.com/2012/02/motorola-cant-enforce-standard.html
German courts have made a ruling that means if Motorola tries to use its most important patents against Apple in a court case the company will be in violation of European Anti trust law.
As the article says:
"Apple scored a breakthrough court victory today against Motorola. Its important can hardly be overstated. This is so huge that it even begs the question of whether Google's strategy for its $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility has failed before the deal is even formally closed (they're still waiting for some regulatory approvals)."
It would be nice to see Apple bought down a peg or two but the way things are going its likely to be Google-Motorola (and therefore also Android) that is on the losing side.
After all Motorola cannot use its genuinely essential patents in court now and yet Apple can still use dumb ones like voice search, touch screen, text completion etcetera that although every decent phone nowadays has these features Apple own the patents to and have been able to use in court cases so it seems Apple now have the upper hand.
Dave
Why, yes, Apple, you can patent intuitive actions on your devices all you please; and don't worry about those pesky other companies patenting worthwhile operating features, we'll make them play ball with you. Hahaha, let's go smoke this cigar together and laugh at all the little people.
this is getting hilarious...they all should concentrate on developing new devices instead of sueing each other. I hate Apple for all these lawsuits...
Firetribe said:
this is getting hilarious...they all should concentrate on developing new devices instead of sueing each other. I hate Apple for all these lawsuits...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They can't develop new devices without violating apples patents anymore. When the new phones with android get released after mwc you'll see more lawsuits against those models too.
Apple will win because they have patents that are not subject to frand so don't have to let people use them.
Odd thing is that apples licence offer to motorola, which stopped the injunction on iphones in Germany, is still less than motorola asked for yet judges order them to not sue apple as a result.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
Yeo, I know it was Apple who started it all... I just feel sorry for the time wasted in court, only to slow down the other side, time and money which could be used much better.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
Firetribe said:
Yeo, I know it was Apple who started it all... I just feel sorry for the time wasted in court, only to slow down the other side, time and money which could be used much better.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Things got worse for motorola today as apple won court case over the android gallery and they have to change it or all their products running android get banned and recalled.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
First of all you have to consider the source of this information to be able to evaluate the spin on this. Florian Mueller is a anti Google/Android pro MS mouthpiece who tends to be clueless.
This is a lifting of the preliminary injunction. The case itself is still pending, but It'll likely to take quite a while to finish up. Granted this isn't good news for Motorola, but it's NOT the end of the road.
Check out Groklaw for a different slant on this and other issues (eg Oracle/Google)
jcmm11 said:
First of all you have to consider the source of this information to be able to evaluate the spin on this. Florian Mueller is a anti Google/Android pro MS mouthpiece who tends to be clueless.
This is a lifting of the preliminary injunction. The case itself is still pending, but It'll likely to take quite a while to finish up. Granted this isn't good news for Motorola, but it's NOT the end of the road.
Check out Groklaw for a different slant on this and other issues (eg Oracle/Google)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually he uses android devices as he has a Samsung that was affected by the german court case against them last year and he is actually very knowledgeable.
I follow his work and have not noticed any pro apple bias but the things he states are facts, motorolas cannot sue apple using their patents for the duration of the appeal which is between one to two years so how would any bias change the facts?
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
He said "pro MS" and not "pro apple"
mistermentality said:
Actually he uses android devices as he has a Samsung that was affected by the german court case against them last year and he is actually very knowledgeable.
I follow his work and have not noticed any pro apple bias but the things he states are facts, motorolas cannot sue apple using their patents for the duration of the appeal which is between one to two years so how would any bias change the facts?
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
atljatl said:
He said "pro MS" and not "pro apple"
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He said anti android as well which if the guy uses android as he does is unlikely.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
Sucks for Motorola. I really had hope this would be a big battle for the long lasting.
starable said:
Sucks for Motorola. I really had hope this would be a big battle for the long lasting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that steve jobs was gone, apple would stop these law suits but it seems to be differing
OMG. Counter Strike On Android! http://cs-portable.net/
The patent trolling will never end.
Patent fraud is some really easy money, especially when you've got easy victories guaranteed, like Apple does.
Firetribe said:
Yeo, I know it was Apple who started it all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola sued apple first, which started the ball rolling..
Tone_ said:
Motorola sued apple first, which started the ball rolling..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola sued after apple didn't pay licencing fees in 2010, something apple still won't pay. Bit different to apple suing because phones can auto complete text for example.
Motorola sued for a good reason but apple do so to stifle competition.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
So ridiculous.
European courts seem to be all over Apple's side.
mistermentality said:
Motorola sued after apple didn't pay licencing fees in 2010, something apple still won't pay. Bit different to apple suing because phones can auto complete text for example.
Motorola sued for a good reason but apple do so to stifle competition.
Dave
Sent from my LG P920 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
saw this and i thought i would say that apple originally started all of this by suing google and HTC first
they r trying to hold back developemnet becuz thats all apple has done is steal and try and stop competition
in the long run apple will fall
and ppl only buy apple products cuz they br pretty i buy google products for quality and interfacing
all in all apple products r made for the stupid and wealthy while android/windows r made for ppl that want to improve thru the reason y google is open source
Long live open source!
Apple are thieves.
Buy an Apple product and you support your own demise.
Wake up people!
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA
Do your own research and decide. His name is mud on Slashdot and Groklaw. Here's one article. found at m.paidcontent.org/article/419-is-patent-expertblogger-florian-mueller-getting-too-cozy-with-microsoft/
Partial quote:
The problem lies not with Mueller’s analysis—but with his impartiality. The engineer is right when he says that Mueller has the knives out for Google. Even a casual reader of the FOSS blog can easily discern that Mueller is quick to amplify any legal setback for Google’s Android or its affiliates. His tone can be crowing and haughty—see the tendentious “Google scores an Own Goal” post about Motorola (NYSE: MMI)—and for all the world echoes Microsoft’s own “they’re getting what they deserve” attitude to Google.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

Categories

Resources